President Donald Trump warned Monday that countries imposing digital taxes on American tech companies will face significant tariffs if they don’t remove them. Without naming a specific country, Trump said that some nations had given a “complete pass” to China’s tech companies while penalizing American competitors. Some countries, like Canada and India, have already backed away from digital taxes after pressure from the Trump administration.  “As the President of the United States, I will stand up to Countries that attack our incredible American Tech Companies. Digital Taxes, Digital Services Legislation, and Digital Markets Regulations are all designed to harm, or discriminate against, American Technology,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.  “This must end, and end NOW! With this TRUTH, I put all Countries with Digital Taxes, Legislation, Rules, or Regulations, on notice that unless these discriminatory actions are removed, I, as President of the United States, will impose substantial additional Tariffs on that Country’s Exports to the U.S.A., and institute Export restrictions on our Highly Protected Technology and Chips,” he added. “America, and American Technology Companies, are neither the ‘piggy bank’ nor the ‘doormat’ of the World any longer. Show respect to America and our amazing Tech Companies or, consider the consequences!” End of Summer Sale – Get 40% off New DailyWire+ Annual Memberships In June, Canada rescinded its Digital Service Tax as part of ongoing trade negotiations with the United States. The tax would have hit American tech companies like Amazon, Google, Meta, and Apple hard, and could have cost American businesses up to $2.3 billion annually.  India also backed away from a 6% digital advertising tax in April after pressure from American officials.  Many European countries, like France and Switzerland, have implemented digital taxes, while others, like Belgium and the Netherlands, are considering implementing them. France taxes major tech companies 3% on revenue from digital services and targeted advertising.  In the trade deal between the European Union and the United States, both entities agreed to address “unjustified digital trade barriers.”  “In that respect, The European Union confirms that it will not adopt or maintain network usage fees,” the framework said. “The United States and the European Union will not impose customs duties on electronic transmissions.” It is unclear if the agreement will address digital service taxes.

President Trump’s proposed federal crackdown on Chicago threatens to ignite a constitutional showdown, pitting federal power against local control and escalating the national debate over crime, immigration, and civil liberties. Trump Administration Sets Sights on Chicago After D.C. Crackdown On August 22, 2025, President Donald Trump publicly declared that Chicago would be the next major city to face a federal crackdown targeting crime, homelessness, and illegal immigration. This announcement followed the deployment of the National Guard and increased federal law enforcement presence in Washington, D.C., a move that drew widespread attention and controversy. Trump’s rhetoric focused on restoring safety and order, asserting the need for decisive federal action where local policies have failed. The president’s approach is framed as a response to persistent crime and the perceived inability of Democratic city leaders to address urban crises. Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson and Illinois Governor JB Pritzker responded swiftly, denouncing the proposed intervention as both illegal and unconstitutional. They argue that the deployment of federal forces and the National Guard to Chicago without local consent violates core principles of American federalism and erodes community trust. Mayor Johnson emphasized that such measures would do little to address the city’s housing crisis or root causes of crime, while Governor Pritzker accused the administration of manufacturing a crisis for political gain. This standoff highlights the deep divide between Republican federal leadership and Democratic city officials, with both sides mobilizing public support and preparing for possible legal resistance. Federal Intervention Sparks Constitutional and Political Tensions The Trump administration’s strategy mirrors recent actions in Washington, D.C., where federal intervention included mass arrests and military deployment. In Chicago, however, the move faces heightened scrutiny due to the city’s status as a sanctuary jurisdiction and its history of challenging federal immigration policies. Legal scholars warn that deploying the National Guard without consent from state or city officials may violate the Posse Comitatus Act, which limits the use of federal military personnel in domestic law enforcement. Urban policy experts argue that military-style crackdowns do not address underlying social issues and may worsen police-community relations, especially in cities with significant minority populations. Federal authorities, led by the Department of Justice, are also pressuring Illinois to dismantle sanctuary policies and cooperate fully with immigration enforcement. The administration has threatened funding cuts and possible legal penalties for jurisdictions that resist federal directives, intensifying the stakes for local leaders. These tactics reflect a broader pattern in Trump’s second term, including aggressive new laws, executive orders, and the expansion of local-federal enforcement partnerships. The administration’s actions test the limits of presidential power and raise substantial legal questions about states’ rights and the separation of powers. Impact on Chicago Residents, Law Enforcement, and National Policy If the federal crackdown proceeds, Chicago residents could face increased law enforcement presence, potential protests, and heightened community tensions. Local officials warn of possible disruption to public services, economic instability, and strain on vulnerable populations. For law enforcement, the deployment of federal agents and the National Guard could complicate ongoing efforts to build trust with neighborhoods affected by crime and poverty. The broader impact extends to national policy: the outcome in Chicago could set precedents for federal intervention in other cities, reshape funding mechanisms, and influence the future of urban governance across the United States. As of August 25, 2025, no formal order for National Guard deployment to Chicago has been issued, but the threat remains active and the debate continues. Both sides are preparing for legal and political battles that may define the boundaries of federal and local authority for years to come. The situation in Chicago serves as a flashpoint for ongoing struggles over illegal immigration, government overreach, and the protection of constitutional rights—issues at the heart of conservative values and the national conversation. 'Stay out of our city': Chicago officials slam Trump's threat to target the city https://t.co/cyvYSgHlYy — ABC11 EyewitnessNews (@ABC11_WTVD) August 25, 2025 Expert opinions remain divided. Supporters of Trump view federal intervention as necessary to restore order and protect law-abiding citizens, citing sharp decreases in illegal crossings and crime in other targeted cities. Critics, including civil rights groups and city officials, argue that such actions undermine constitutional protections and ignore the complex causes of urban violence. The legal, social, and political ramifications of this federal-local conflict will likely reverberate far beyond Chicago, shaping the trajectory of American governance in the coming years. Sources: Trump calls Chicago a ‘killing field’ as he targets city for next federal crackdown Trump sets sights on Chicago to make it ‘safer,’ seeks $2B to… President Donald Trump says Chicago is likely next target… Mayor Brandon Johnson Statement On President Trump’s Comments… Chicago officials slam Trump’s threat to target the city

House Republican military veterans marked the fourth anniversary of the Abbey Gate bombing that killed 13 service members in August 2021 by releasing heartfelt testimonials reflecting on the tragedy. The group of GOP lawmakers, many of whom were deployed to Afghanistan before serving in Congress, honored the sacrifice of the fallen heroes in tribute videos […]

'Completely culturally disconnected'

'I think they're in for a bad time'

And this is why I love baseball

'I will not resign'

The suspect has been linked to other crimes involving women.

'Not going to allow'

Police in the Polish town of Rybnik are calling this teenager a hero after he reacted when no one else did to a random act of violence and allowed the victim to escape. Located in the Silesia region, the young man—found through his characteristic ‘Hello Kitty’ t-shirt—was standing at a bus stop along with a […] The post Polish Officers Looking for Teen Hero Who Saved Woman from Bus Stop Attacker appeared first on Good News Network.