from SGT Report: It looks like Tampon Tim Walz, the current Governor of Minnesota, probably sold state secrets to China. If he actually did what has been alleged against him he is guilty of high treason a crime which is punishable by life is prison or execution. Sam Anthony is back to help me break […]

by Brian Shilhavy, Health Impact News: President Donald Trump called on CNN to fire the lead reporter of the “Exclusive” article published earlier this week that revealed an alleged leaked Pentagon study stating that Iran’s nuclear sites were not completely destroyed. I also reported on this story, as did every single corporate media outlet, two days […]

from Health Ranger Report:  TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

Boasting millions of users globally, Care.com is a leading platform for caregiving services, including childcare, senior care, pet care, and housekeeping. While this matching service may be a convenient way to book a quick babysitter, there’s something all users — but especially parents — need to know about the platform.A few years ago, an independent journalist named Edwin Dorsey dug into Care.com after his friend, who was a babysitter on the platform, told him something didn’t feel right about the company. Dorsey set to work experimenting with the website. It wasn’t long before it became crystal clear that Care.com wasn’t at all what people thought it was.On a recent episode of “Relatable,” Dorsey joined Allie Beth Stuckey to share his dark findings. “Care.com claimed to be a very safe place to look for babysitters, and they claimed to be running background checks,” says Dorsey. But when he did his own experiment signing up to be a babysitter, it became clear that the background checks were a myth.“The way I tested their process is by trying to sign up as Harvey Weinstein, who was in the news a lot at the time. So I used a photo of Harvey Weinstein, I used the email harveythebabysitter@gmail.com, I made up a social security number, ... and I consented to their background check on Care.com to be a licensed babysitter,” he recounts. “And to my amazement, I was approved.”To make sure it wasn’t some one-off fluke, Dorsey applied to be a babysitter using the alias “Daffy Duck,” and again he was approved. “They're telling parents they're running background checks. They're charging people for background checks, and then they're not running the background checks,” he tells Allie.When Dorsey wrote up these disturbing findings in an article that went viral, Care.com “called [his] college to get [him] in trouble” and “sent some legal letter to [his] parents' house.” But this only made Dorsey “dig in more.”“So then I went to every state attorney general to get consumer complaints people had filed on Care.com, and I saw tons of safety issues,” he says. “I even go to some police departments, and I ask for all 911 calls that had Care.com mentioned in the transcript because I want to see how extensive all these abuses are.”This digging resulted in shocking revelations.“There’s a lot of people who had criminal histories who were approved to babysit on Care.com. There's a lot of people who had their kids taken away from them who then go become babysitters on Care.com. There's people who've been banned from running day cares who are listing their services on Care.com. There's people with DUIs and battery charges advertising themselves on Care.com — all unbeknownst to parents,” says Dorsey.“Ultimately, there were eight kids who were given to Care.com babysitters with criminal histories, where the parents didn't know, and the kids ended up dying,” he adds.Dorsey ultimately linked up with Gregory Zuckerman at the Wall Street Journal, who turned his research on Care.com into a front-page exposé.Sadly, the disturbing events Dorsey uncovered aren’t isolated to the Care.com platform. Today, Dorsey is reporting on another caregiving service — KinderCare, a chain of childcare and early education centers in the U.S. serving military families and receiving tax dollars through government subsidies for low-income families.His investigations have exposed issues such as toddlers escaping onto busy roads, children being left alone in locked buildings or buses, and allegations of physical, verbal, and sexual abuse at KinderCare facilities. And yet these stories are getting “literally zero media reporting,” he says.To hear more about Dorsey’s investigations, watch the clip above.Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

The famous DataRepublican data analyst dropped damaging information she had gathered about Code Pink's connections to the communist Chinese government after the group threatened legal action against her.The database kernel engineer, whose real name is Jennica Pounds, said Wednesday on social media that the group sent her a message accusing her of libel.'I will share the facts without spin.' "We are writing to formally address and correct the false and defamatory statements made in your recent social media posts regarding CODEPINK," the group reportedly wrote. "These claims — which falsely allege that our organization is funded by China, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), or any foreign government or entity — are entirely baseless and constitute libel."Pounds replied, "So, I will share the facts without spin."She posted images from a Code Pink campaign called "China Is Not Our Enemy" and pointed out that the group was funded by a significant contribution from a businessman and social activist named Neville Singham. The billionaire is under congressional investigation for possibly violating the Foreign Agents Registration Act by possibly acting on behalf of the Chinese government.Pounds went on to show how the propaganda pushed by the group served to promote "pro-China messaging, including denial of the Uyghur genocide, an atrocity affirmed by the U.S. Department of State." She also posted an interview with Jodie Evans, the wife of Singham and co-founder of Code Pink, where she allegedly said that Uyghurs were terrorists, in order to justify their oppression by the Chinese government. Code Pink has also opposed the U.S. attacks on the Houthi terrorist group. The group first gained fame by protesting against the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. RELATED: These two Chinese billionaires are funneling money into the trans movement in the US but NOT China — WHY? DataRepublican had worked anonymously to uncover fraud and abuse in the government, but she revealed her identity in order to thwart the efforts of those who wanted to scare her into hiding. "I have been doxxed. Rather than let others control the narrative, I am addressing this directly," she said in February. "I am 100% Deaf and nonverbal," she continued. "My lack of signing fluency does not make me any less Deaf. It is a result of a language impairment related to my autism called expressive dysphasia, which affects my ability to construct language fluently in real-time."She has since worked to document and uncover more government funding malfeasance. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!