Octopus’s Pardon: Naive British Man Survives Encounter With Blue-Ringed Tiny Tentacled Terror

Archaeologists in Sweden have discovered the skeleton of a dog next to a long bone dagger in a bog. An excavation of the Logsjömossen in Gerstaberg in advance of construction of a new high-speed rail line unearthed the remains of the Stone Age dog buried with the 10-inch long dagger 5,000 years ago. Finding complete skeletons of dogs from this period is rare enough, but the discovery of a dagger accompanying the canine is unique. The layer where the bones were found was removed from the bog in three large sections for later excavation in laboratory conditions. Archaeologists concluded from the dog was male and between three and six years old when he died. He was well-muscled from having lived an active life, and about 20 inches high at the withers. The bones were articulated in their anatomically correct positions, but his skull was found in fragments further away from his body. It appears his skull was crushed before he was deposited in the lake. His body was likely placed in an organic container — perhaps a leather bag — with stones to weight it down and was lowered into what was then a lake. It was about five feet deep and 100-130 feet from the shore. The dagger was found adjacent to the dog’s paws. It is finely ground to a sharp edge with a hole cut out at one end. It was carved from an elk or red deer metatarsal bone. Daggers like this were imbued with ritual significance in the Neolithic era, and examples have been found in watery environments at several prehistoric sites in southern and central Sweden. Dogs are also known to have been used in ritual offerings from this period. The excavation of the bog has uncovered extensive wooden remains radiocarbon dated to 3,300–2,900 B.C. and 2,900–2,600 B.C. They include piles driven into the lakebed believed to have been the foundations of piers, a structure of willows intertwined and tied together and the remains of fish trap. The dog was probably killed and buried with the bone dagger in a ritual act performed by the same people built these structures and used the lake for fishing. The remains will now be subjected to carbon dating and DNA analysis which will hopefully confirm the timeline that connects the dog to the Neolithic people of the lake.

House Republican Conference chairwoman Lisa McClain says Democrats are to blame for mounting cost-of-living concerns among Americans.McClain, the fourth-ranking House Republican, has been helping craft…

[View Article at Source]The British government is more committed to multiculturalism than to keeping women safe. The post Labour’s War on Women appeared first on The American Conservative.

[View Article at Source]An IMEU poll shows conservatives under 45 favor cutting U.S. arms to Israel, oppose renewing aid agreements, and back independent investigations into Americans killed by Israeli…

[View Article at Source]The second Trump administration is pushing forward with the merger of tech and government. The post Trump, AI, and States’ Rights appeared first on The American Conservative.…

UK Special Coverage Labour’s War on Women The British government is more committed to multiculturalism than to keeping women safe. UK Special Coverage Once upon a time, the British Labour Party had a strong track record of protecting and caring about women. In previous governments, it passed landmark equal-pay laws, brought in stricter laws around domestic violence, and introduced legislation to ban discrimination on the basis of sex.  But today it is difficult to ignore the fact that Labour is no longer especially concerned with the plight of women and girls. Last week, Baroness Falkner of Margravine, the former head of the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), told the Times she believed the party had “abandoned” women over issues like transgender ideology and the grooming gangs scandal. Falkner pointed to the fact that the government has so far failed to publish statutory guidance on single-sex spaces in line with the Supreme Court’s April 2025 ruling that “sex” in the Equality Act refers to biological sex, not self-declared identity. Falkner believes this is because ministers are “terrified of MPs” who are gunning for “trans self-identification or trans inclusion to prevail across all areas of society.” The EHRC has already provided the government with drafted guidance on how public bodies, businesses and employers should interpret the ruling, but this is yet to be published—despite Falkner being “so certain of the lawfulness of our code that I don’t think I’ve ever been so certain about anything before.”  As a result of the government dragging its feet over this, NHS trusts, local councils, schools, and universities are struggling to interpret and implement the Supreme Court ruling. In some instances, biological men who identify as women are still being allowed to access single-sex spaces, like toilets and changing rooms. The government response to this has been equivalent to a shrug. In the meantime, women are expected to simply grin and bear it, as they have done for years now, and continue to allow men into their spaces. Their discomfort is wholly irrelevant to Labour, which remains uninterested in enforcing a legal judgment it would prefer never happened in the first place. Regrettably, the Supreme Court ruling is far from the only women’s issue that Labour is content to ignore. As Falkner laments, the government has entirely let down the “oppressed and vulnerable” victims of grooming gangs. Over the course of years (in some areas, decades), thousands of girls were trafficked, raped, and tortured at the hands of predominantly Muslim Pakistani men across the country. The suffering of these mostly white, working-class girls was largely disregarded both by Labour and by previous governments. Starmer’s government, however, has been particularly obstinate in refusing to acknowledge the scale and horrors of the grooming gangs. After repeatedly refusing to properly investigate the scandal on a nationwide scale, with one MP even dismissing talk of grooming gangs as a right-wing “dog whistle,” Labour finally gave in to pressure and begrudgingly announced this summer that it would be holding a national inquiry.  This quickly began to disintegrate, as five of the grooming-gang survivors recruited to the panel quit the inquiry, accusing safeguarding minister Jess Phillips of expanding the investigation’s scope to include other forms of abuse—in what the five victims claimed was an attempt to downplay the involvement of Pakistani Muslim men. These accusations were rejected by Phillips, but were soon borne out in internal leaked emails.  Just last week, furor exploded over the moderate Labour MP Mike Tapp’s suggestion that the inquiry will, in fact, be investigating the possible links between grooming gangs and ethnicity, religion, and culture. Tapp quite reasonably stated that “we must identify and address any links” and ensure the government does not “turn away from this.” Naturally, his comments were met with the usual cries of “fascist rhetoric” from the far left, but even within Tapp’s own party, at least one MP reportedly lodged a complaint against him. He or she is apparently demanding to know whether it is the official government position that ethnic-minority groups are predisposed to child rape.  The harsh truth is that Labour is more committed to upholding the multicultural project than it is to protecting women and girls. If that were not the case, it wouldn’t still be failing spectacularly to police the country’s borders. The UK migration system is currently allowing large numbers of foreign men to enter the country illegally, many of whom we know nothing about. As of last year, foreign nationals are about 140 percent more likely to be convicted of sexual offenses than you’d expect from their share of the population. To make matters worse, a whistleblower from inside the Home Office revealed to the Telegraph last month that committing a crime is no barrier to being granted asylum in the UK—provided that the crime in question does not carry a sentence of more than 12 months. Even those foreign criminals who do manage to be hit with a deportation order are not guaranteed to actually be removed. The glacial pace of the British courts and appeals system means that some will wait years to be removed from the country, even when they have been found guilty of sexual assaults or other violent crime.  Labour’s lax approach to migrant crime has real consequences for the safety of women and girls. This week alone, we learned that two 17-year-old Afghan asylum seekers were sentenced for the abduction and rape of a 15-year-old in Leamington Spa; an Afghan national was charged with raping two 14-year-old girls in Bolton; and a failed asylum seeker from Trinidad staying in a state-run migrant hotel was found guilty of rape and sexual assault after the victim recorded the attack. These kinds of horrific stories have become a nearly weekly occurrence.  It is nearly impossible for Labour to defend women seriously today, because the threats have shifted and the party refuses to adjust. It is incapable of recognizing that women face dangers beyond vague notions of “discrimination” and “microaggressions.” It is stuck obsessing over menopause awareness schemes and policing online misogyny. Recognizing that the greater peril comes more from trans ideology, multiculturalism, and open borders would require a complete overhaul of Labour’s current worldview—something that has more in common with student unions than the trade unions of yore. That, in turn, would mean admitting that the ideology that most of the party has pledged allegiance to was not only wrong, but also actively dangerous.  It would be satisfying to imagine that, with growing public backlash against both gender ideology and mass migration, Labour will be forced to choose between its ideological commitments and women’s safety. In reality, it will likely continue to ride out scandal after depraved scandal, its political corpse propped up by voters who cling to old loyalties—or who support Labour on identitarian grounds. The only good that might come of this is that more women will come to learn what the British working classes have known for a long time: Labour has well and truly left them behind. The post Labour’s War on Women appeared first on The American Conservative.

Staying grounded as Nine Inch Nails took off. The post How Trent Reznor described himself and his music at 25: “A bummed out guy from Cleveland” first appeared on Far Out Magazine.

Promoting Fake Iranian Opposition at Your Own Risk

The Destructive Force Enabling Mayhem