YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #satire #astronomy #libtards #nightsky #moon
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

History Traveler
History Traveler
12 w

10 Forgotten Festivals: Celebrations That Defined Eras, Now Lost to Time
Favicon 
historycollection.com

10 Forgotten Festivals: Celebrations That Defined Eras, Now Lost to Time

Throughout history, festivals have been the heartbeat of societies, uniting people in celebration, ritual, and shared identity. Many of these grand gatherings, once central to the rhythms of life, have vanished—lost to the tides of change, conquest, and modernization. Why do some traditions endure while others slip quietly into obscurity? This journey uncovers ten forgotten ...
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
12 w

15 Inventions That Prove Ancient People Were Geniuses
Favicon 
historycollection.com

15 Inventions That Prove Ancient People Were Geniuses

Throughout history, ancient civilizations have dazzled us with their inventive spirit and practical brilliance. From the pyramids of Egypt to the aqueducts of Rome, these societies engineered solutions that addressed the challenges of their day. But their achievements didn’t just shape the ancient world—they continue to influence the technology and infrastructure we rely on today. ...
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
12 w

15 Cultural Practices That Outsiders Couldn’t Understand
Favicon 
historycollection.com

15 Cultural Practices That Outsiders Couldn’t Understand

Every culture is woven from unique traditions, rituals, and beliefs that often surprise those looking in from the outside. What might feel ordinary or even sacred within one society can appear utterly perplexing to someone unfamiliar with its roots. These differences can spark curiosity—or confusion—highlighting just how powerful context and history are in shaping customs. ...
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
12 w

Cutthroat war between Bannon and Levin erupts…
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Cutthroat war between Bannon and Levin erupts…

from Revolver News: There’s a war brewing on the right, and this one isn’t in the desert; it’s on the airwaves and social media. On one side is Steve Bannon, a populist voice leading the America First base. On the other side is Mark Levin, beating the war drums like a man possessed, lashing out […]
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
12 w Politics

rumbleRumble
The Five (Full episode) - Friday, June 27
Like
Comment
Share
The People's Voice Feed
The People's Voice Feed
12 w

Favicon 
thepeoplesvoice.tv

Prince William & Kate Middleton Hold Private Meeting with Melinda Gates

Kate Middleton, who had been taking a break from public duties has quietly resumed her official engagements according to reports. The the Court Circular, which formally records royal engagements, said that the Princess of Wales [...] The post Prince William & Kate Middleton Hold Private Meeting with Melinda Gates appeared first on The People's Voice.
Like
Comment
Share
The People's Voice Feed
The People's Voice Feed
12 w

Favicon 
thepeoplesvoice.tv

Hundreds Of Women Sue Pfizer Over Birth Control Jab Linked To Brain Tumors

Hundreds of women in the US and the UK suing the big pharma giant over a contraceptive jab that has put them at risk of a potentially fatal brain tumors. In the UK, NHS data [...] The post Hundreds Of Women Sue Pfizer Over Birth Control Jab Linked To Brain Tumors appeared first on The People's Voice.
Like
Comment
Share
Living In Faith
Living In Faith
12 w

‘Materialists’ Hints at Hunger for Sincere Romance
Favicon 
www.thegospelcoalition.org

‘Materialists’ Hints at Hunger for Sincere Romance

Ross Douthat’s recent podcast interview with social scientist Alice Evans is fascinating for a lot of reasons. They discuss the fertility crisis, and Evans argues it’s downstream from a “coupling crisis,” which is a byproduct of smartphone retreats into “digital solitude.” Scrolling ourselves to death is no mere metaphor; our obsessive smartphone use is literally leading to global depopulation. In the final minutes of the conversation, Evans suggests one idea for how to reverse the troubling trends: We need to rediscover rom-coms that celebrate romantic love. Douthat agreed, saying he’d be in favor of a government program to subsidize new film adaptations of Jane Austen novels. Hear, hear! Celine Song’s new movie Materialists is more rom-dram than rom-com, and it’s certainly no Austen adaptation. But it may be the sort of thing Evans has in mind. Even as it captures the harrowing dynamics of modern dating, it sincerely celebrates romantic love. It’s a movie that appears to be going one direction—following this century’s trend of cynical, deconstructed, transgressive romance movies—only to end up as a fairly old-school romance akin to something like Sleepless in Seattle. While I didn’t love everything about it, I generally found Materialists refreshing in its seriousness and earnestness. Amid our current “coupling crisis,” when the natural desire for marriage is often outweighed by the logistical, cultural, and material arguments against it, we need more movies like this that celebrate the goodness of marriage. ‘Math’ of Matchmaking Materialists is the second feature written and directed by Song, whose 2023 film Past Lives I also praised as refreshing for its wise, mature take on romance. Like Past Lives, Materialists (rated R for language and some nonexplicit sexual scenes) centers on a love triangle—a woman is torn between two men. Dakota Johnson plays Lucy, a professional matchmaker in NYC. She prides herself on having mastered the “math” of contemporary coupling, which in her view is all about the “value” each single has or doesn’t have in the dating pool (“Six inches of height can double a man’s value in the market”). We need more movies like this that celebrate the goodness of marriage. Unsurprisingly, as the movie progresses, Lucy’s theories are tested as she’s presented with suitors who represent extremely different value propositions. Harry (Pedro Pascal) is a dapper billionaire who wines and dines Lucy, paying the bill at every fancy restaurant without hesitation and offering her a future of penthouses, yachts, and no conflicts over money (something she witnessed in her parents’ marriage growing up). But then there’s John (Chris Evans), the ex-boyfriend Lucy still cares for deeply. John is a destitute actor who barely gets by as a catering waiter and lives in squalor with two roommates. Lucy broke up with him because she was tired of squabbling over $25 expenses (“It’s not because we’re not in love. It’s because we’re broke”). It’s a realistic plot point. Marriage success rates are demonstrably correlated with socioeconomic status. The poorer you are, the less likely you are to get married or stay married. Lucy’s choice—complicated by the fact that both Harry and John are good guys who really do love her—sets up the film’s main drama. It’s not as simple as the “on paper” choice versus the “risky but romantic” option. Happy futures could be envisioned with either man. So Lucy—and the audience—is forced to think through the nature of love. Dating Is Hard. Love Is Easy? Lucy tells one of her clients that dating is hard but love is easy. She’s getting at the reality that modern dating is horribly broken, in large part due to digital apps and social media. The endless choices, algorithmic matchmaking, and “math” permutations of it all complicate what used to be simpler dynamics in coupling—confined to more limited pools of people you know through friends, family, or church. These days, dating is daunting, even dangerous (something Materialists goes out of its way to acknowledge). This is one reason singles are doing it less and why Christian parents and pastors might need to do more encouraging and discipling of singles in this area. Love is easier than dating in the sense that love is a choice that closes off other options and brings simplicity in the form of commitment to one person (the “forsaking all others” part of traditional wedding vows). But love is also hard because it requires fidelity, forbearance, selflessness, and sacrifice—values and vows that can carry a couple forward even when the “material” assets ebb and flow. Love requires fidelity, forbearance, selflessness, and sacrifice—values and vows that can carry a couple forward even when the ‘material’ assets ebb and flow. Lucy may have a rosy view of marital love as “easy” in comparison to dating. But as the movie ends (spoiler alert) she chooses the “for better or worse” commitment of seeing just what love in marriage will require. As I reminded a couple whose wedding I officiated a few weeks ago, the wedding altar may represent the end of one roller-coaster journey (dating). But it’s the beginning of a new, even more shaping journey with its own ups and downs. The refreshing message that comes through in Materialists (and that Lucy assures her single clients of) is that marriage, however hard, is absolutely worth the arduous work of dating. And that’s probably a message today’s marriage-leery, anxious generation needs to hear. More Austen-Style Romance I’d welcome more movies like Materialists. They capture realistic dynamics of modern romance but with a welcome traditionalist bent. Still, the R-rated film includes unsavory language, frequent smoking, premarital sex (nonexplicit), and a noticeable desire to normalize same-sex coupling among minor or background characters. Even as it tilts toward traditionalism in some ways, the universe of Materialists is still shaped by the sexual revolution. It’s a more traditional celebration of marriage, but not necessarily a Christian one. For that reason, I second Douthat’s wish for more Jane Austen romance adaptations: old-school celebrations of virtuous romance and the coming together of chivalrous men and feminine women. Note that the 2005 adaptation of Pride and Prejudice was recently rereleased for its 20th anniversary and did solid box-office numbers. And even though it was released at the pandemic’s onset, 2020’s Emma was also an indie hit. Audiences are hungry for these stories. Here’s hoping Netflix doesn’t mess up its forthcoming Pride and Prejudice adaptation. I’d also love to see Christian filmmakers and producers lean into the vibe shift and make more quality, morally edifying rom-coms and rom-drams. Evans is right. The modern cultural imaginary needs more depictions of the good, true, and beautiful aspects of marriage and romance. Christians should celebrate when Hollywood takes steps in that direction.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
12 w

Trump gave Americans what they didn’t know they needed
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Trump gave Americans what they didn’t know they needed

Donald Trump had publicly toyed with the idea of running for president many times before 2015. In fact, he even entered the Reform Party’s presidential primaries for the 2000 election. But the timing was never quite right — until it finally was.Of the many actions and twists of fate that created the opening for Trump’s presidential candidacy, the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision in 2010 is an underappreciated one. Hailed by the conservative legal establishment as a win for free speech (on the merits, I would agree), in practice, it unleashed a flood of money into the American political system, fundamentally reshaping the landscape of campaigns and how they were conducted. The man who had descended that golden escalator years earlier was still there, still fighting, still determined to strive and seek and find, and not to yield.Suddenly, the candidates themselves mattered much less, along with political parties. What mattered now were the new players who emerged from the wreckage of campaign finance law.Super PACs could raise unlimited funds from corporations and billionaires. Dark money nonprofits kept their donors’ identities secret while spending hundreds of millions of dollars on attack ads. Labor unions could now spend unlimited treasury funds on elections. A new class of mega-donors wielded influence that dwarfed anything seen in American politics since the Gilded Age.Courting donors over votersLinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman could pour millions into Democratic super PACs and dark money groups. The Service Employees International Union could spend tens of millions mobilizing voters and running ads. George Soros could funnel tens of millions through a network of left-liberal nonprofits to influence elections at every level of government. Candidates became supplicants in this new ecosystem, spending their days not connecting with voters but courting billionaires at private fundraisers, their policy positions increasingly shaped by the preferences of their financial benefactors rather than their constituents.Voters noticed. They saw their television screens dominated by attack ads funded by shadowy groups with names like “American Bridge” and “Democracy for America” — names that were meant to sound generically patriotic and like they might belong to a real civic organization. But hearing them triggered something of an uncanny valley effect.These changes to the political landscape occurred against the backdrop of a recession that continued to drag on and revelations that the NSA was engaged in widespread domestic surveillance. The combination was toxic: a political system that felt increasingly bought and paid for by wealthy interests, an economy that wasn’t working for ordinary people, and a government that was spying on its own citizens.RELATED: Soros and McCain: The unholy alliance hidden in plain sight Photo by FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP via Getty ImagesBy early 2015, the presidential race appeared to be the ultimate expression of this corrupted system. On the Republican side, 16 candidates were scrambling for the affections of mega-donors, with Jeb Bush’s Right to Rise super PAC raising over $100 million before he even officially announced his candidacy.Meanwhile, Hillary Clinton was cementing her position as the Democratic front-runner by giving $225,000 speeches to Goldman Sachs and collecting millions from Wall Street firms through the Clinton Foundation. She embodied everything that had gone wrong with American politics: a former public official who had leveraged her government positions into vast personal wealth, maintaining close ties to the very financial interests that Americans blamed for the 2008 crash. The prospect of a Clinton-Bush general election felt like the ultimate expression of a rigged system — two political dynasties, both thoroughly embedded in the donor class, offering voters a choice between different flavors of establishment corruption.Social media-sanitized speechBeyond the obvious problems of corruption, the influx of cash and new types of political players were merging with another phenomenon that was reshaping American politics: the rise of social media and its democratization of political destruction. The 2006 “macaca moment,” when Virginia Republican Sen. George Allen’s use of an obscure North African racial slur (his mother was raised in Tunisia) was captured on video and uploaded to YouTube, had served as an early warning of how a single unguarded moment could end a political career. By 2015, politicians had learned to navigate this new landscape with extreme caution, delivering focus-grouped sound bites and staying rigidly on message to avoid giving their opponents — or the online mob — ammunition.This created a feedback loop with the post-Citizens United donor class: Candidates became even more scripted and poll-tested because they couldn’t afford to alienate their financial backers with an off-the-cuff remark that might go viral. Corporate donors and wealthy superfunders demanded message discipline and political correctness from their chosen candidates, adding another layer of constraint to an already sanitized political discourse. The result was that American politics had become unbearably dull, with American politicians speaking an entirely different language from the American people.Enter Donald TrumpInto that world stepped Donald Trump. His ride down the golden escalator marked the beginning of a journey that would shatter the suffocating façade of American politics. That escalator ride was itself emblematic, the first of a decade-long series of glittering images that dazzled and dizzied the American public.Trump’s political staff had tried to keep him from riding the escalator, arguing it would look “amateurish and not remotely presidential.” He overrode them, as he would continue to do at key junctures. Just as the political establishment fundamentally underestimated and misunderstood the man and his appeal, so did many of those who worked closely with him. Few have ever really understood Trump, as evidenced by the failure of so many Republicans who tried to imitate what they thought were his key points of appeal.Trump did not just break the system — he made the system break itself.Within minutes of announcing his presidential run, he had violated every norm of politics, calling Mexican immigrants rapists and drug dealers while his rivals cowered behind carefully vetted talking points. Just weeks later, he attacked John McCain’s war record, declaring, “I like people who weren’t captured.” Any other candidate would have been finished before he started — donors would have fled, consultants would have resigned, and the media would have declared the campaign dead on arrival. But Trump had no donors to placate and no handlers to satisfy.While his 16 Republican opponents were trapped in a system that demanded they speak in euphemisms and focus-grouped boilerplate, Trump could say exactly what millions of Americans felt but had been told was unspeakable in polite political society.Though the media declared his campaign was toast, they couldn’t turn away from the spectacle. No one could. Trump did not just break the system — he made the system break itself. The more outrageous his statements, the more coverage he received. Cable news couldn’t resist the ratings bonanza. Every controversial tweet became breaking news, every rally a must-watch live event. The media, who had long served as enforcers of political correctness and donor-approved messaging, found themselves amplifying the very voice that was destroying their gatekeeping power.Trump’s Republican opponents remained paralyzed, unable to adapt or even understand what was happening under their feet. So completely did Trump dominate every news cycle that even Jeb Bush’s $100 million super PAC couldn’t muster a fraction of the attention for its candidate that Trump could with a single tweet — and for free. Trump also had help from Hillary Clinton’s campaign, which deliberately boosted him during the Republican primary because, in one of the biggest political misjudgments in American history, campaign operatives thought he would be the easiest opponent to defeat in the general election.The comebackTrump’s first term came and went. I saw him at a low point, just ahead of the 2022 midterm elections. He was doing a rally in Mesa, Arizona, for the Republican ticket. Only the faithful were still showing up. He was characteristically running late. The desert sun was brutal, even in October. The only bottled water inside the security perimeter had been sitting in the sun all day and was boiling hot. During the wait, I had helped with several incidents of heat exhaustion. Those of us who remained were in a practically hallucinatory state by the time Trump came onstage.He was obviously tired. Not just in a physical sense, but a deeper kind of tiredness. It was just two months after the FBI had raided his home, the latest in a long series of serious attacks by his political enemies. But he went on through the full act. The setting sun had painted the desert horizon a crimson red.As the speech wound into its finale, I was reminded of Lord Tennyson’s “Ulysses,” a poem about an aging king gathering his faithful mariners for one more voyage, one more adventure into the unknown. “Though much is taken, much abides; and though we are not now that strength which in old days moved earth and heaven, that which we are, we are, one equal temper of heroic hearts, made weak by time and fate, but strong in will, to strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield,” the poet wrote. Trump may have seemed diminished, but he was not defeated. The man who had descended that golden escalator seven years earlier was still there, still fighting, still determined to strive and seek and find, and not to yield.And so he did not yield. Two years later, Trump would return to the presidency in what would be one of the most remarkable political comebacks in American history. The faithful who endured the brutal heat that October day had witnessed not an ending, but an intermission. The assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, became the ultimate test of his political resilience. Rising with blood on his face and fist raised, shouting “Fight! Fight! Fight!” he transformed what could have been his final moment into his resurrection, emerging from that brush with mortality — not diminished but reborn, rejuvenated, and more powerful than ever.What Trump has given to America is not what we wanted — we didn’t even know what to want — but what we needed: a vision of greatness.Editor’s note: This article was originally published in the American Mind.
Like
Comment
Share
Science Explorer
Science Explorer
12 w

Are cats the only animals that purr?
Favicon 
www.livescience.com

Are cats the only animals that purr?

Everyone knows what a happy cat sounds like. But are they the only animals that purr?
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 10938 out of 91328
  • 10934
  • 10935
  • 10936
  • 10937
  • 10938
  • 10939
  • 10940
  • 10941
  • 10942
  • 10943
  • 10944
  • 10945
  • 10946
  • 10947
  • 10948
  • 10949
  • 10950
  • 10951
  • 10952
  • 10953
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund