Fox News White House correspondent Peter Doocy got a strange look from President Donald Trump — and a chuckle from Vice President JD Vance — when he asked the president point blank about the rumors of his death that had circulated over the weekend. During an Oval Office event on Tuesday afternoon, Doocy pressed Trump to reveal when and how he’d come to find out that he’d died over the weekend. WATCH: President Trump just SLAMMED his critics who wished him dead after not having a news conference for TWO DAYS! “I didn’t do any for two days, and they said there must be something wrong with him.” “Biden wouldn’t do ’em for MONTHS! You wouldn’t see him! And nobody ever said… pic.twitter.com/W5X7aRsuuY — Townhall.com (@townhallcom) September 2, 2025 “How did you find out over the weekend that you were dead?” Doocy asked, prompting a quick sideways glance from the president, but no other change in his expression. Vance, standing behind Trump and to his left, was clearly amused by the question. “Did you see that?” Doocy pressed on as Trump said he hadn’t. “People didn’t see you for a couple of days, 1.3 million user engagements as of Saturday morning about your demise.” Vance shook his head, still smiling, and only then did Trump’s eyebrows raise: “Really? I didn’t see that. You know, I have heard — it’s sort of crazy, but last week I did numerous news conferences, all successful, they went very well like this is going very well. And then I didn’t do any for two days and they said, ‘There must be something wrong with him.'” Trump then pivoted to compare his busy schedule to that of his predecessor, former President Joe Biden, who routinely went weeks without speaking directly to the press. “Biden didn’t do ’em for MONTHS!” he exclaimed, prompting laughs around the room as he continued, “You wouldn’t see him! And nobody ever said there was ever anything wrong with him! And we know he wasn’t in the greatest of shape.”

Republican Iowa Rep. Ashley Hinson announced Tuesday that she will run for Iowa’s open Senate seat in 2026 following Republican Sen. Joni Ernst’s decision not to run for reelection. Hinson, a former TV news anchor who is serving in her third House term, is the first Republican to jump in the race after Ernst announced […]

'BEWARE!'

Americans are drowning in medical and dental bills. Anything from a surprise ER visit to a necessary procedure not fully covered by insurance can quickly lead to tens of thousands of dollars’ worth of debt. Behind the cost of care lies a financial fallout that extends far beyond the doctor’s office. Recent surveys and federal […]

'The Trump Administration is grateful'

'Commitment to transparency'

Returning to the Capitol after a monthlong recess, lawmakers face a tough question: whether or not to extend President Donald Trump’s 30-day control of Washington. Under the District of Columbia Home Rule Act of 1973, Trump’s authority to control D.C.’s law enforcement expires on Sept. 10, after which it will require approval from Congress to continue. On Tuesday, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser appeared to delay any confrontation between the city and the federal government with an order to local law enforcement to cooperate with federal law enforcement “to the maximum extent allowable by law within the District.” Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, R-La., has already teased moving legislation to support the president’s powers in D.C., saying on Fox News that Republicans would bring “legislation to the floor in the next few weeks to address that issue first—that city—to deal with juvenile crime … and to talk about these restrictive policing policies that have prevented law enforcement from maintaining the safety on the streets for residents and visitors.”  But Rep. Keith Self, R-Texas, a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus, told The Daily Signal he’s not sure that authority should continue. “I’m not sure we ought to extend it, because apparently it’s been very successful. And if it’s been very successful, let’s turn it back over to the local governance,” Self said. He added that Washington “is a federal enclave that does require congressional oversight and presidential oversight, but if it’s been as successful as it supposedly has been, let’s turn it back over to them and see if they’re ready to assume their responsibilities.” Self further suggested that deploying the National Guard in the District of Columbia is not a long-term solution. “We don’t want to deploy National Guard for long term on domestic issues anywhere, to include a federal enclave,” he said. At a news conference held by the Republican Study Committee, a caucus to which a majority of House Republicans belong, members also suggested that they were still having discussions about extending the president’s powers. Rep. Harriet Hageman, R-Wyo., appeared to imply that the returning congressmen had not reached a consensus on their next step in the matter. “I think that all of us working together will be coming up with additional bills to address specifically the crime situation in our nation’s capital,” she said, adding: I know that this is our first day back after our August recess. We will be discussing what happens after the expiration of the 30-day period that is allowed for in the Home Rule Act with the president. I know that I will be working with my colleagues here to determine what the next step is in that regard. But Hageman did appear to agree with Self on one thing—that, ultimately, it’s up to the local leaders to determine how they handle crime. “It’s up to the governors and the mayors of those communities as to whether they’re going to protect their citizens—or they’re going to protect the criminals,” she told reporters. “We have seen with the surge in the last 30 days in Washington, D.C., that law enforcement on the streets works. We know that. This is common sense. The mayors and the governors need to step up in places like Chicago, L.A., Atlanta.” Should Republicans seek to extend Trump’s authority in Washington, they will likely run into trouble in the Senate, where 60 votes, including those of several Democrats, would be required to end debate. Such bipartisan cooperation is highly unlikely.  On Tuesday, Senate Minority Whip Dick Durbin and Sen. Tammy Duckworth, both D-Ill., joined seven Democrat House members in signing a letter that condemned Trump’s crime crackdown in Washington, as well as any potential crackdown in Chicago. “Abuses of government and military power to target and punish dissent are the tools of authoritarians,” reads the letter to Trump. “We demand you suspend any plans for the deployment of military personnel to Chicago and cease your unlawful power grabs and Executive Branch overreach.” The post Will Congress Extend Trump’s DC Crime Crackdown Authority? appeared first on The Daily Signal.

President Donald Trump announced Tuesday that the U.S. had carried out a strike against a speedboat said to be carrying narcotics in the southern Caribbean.   “Earlier this morning, on my orders, U.S. Military Forces conducted a kinetic strike against positively identified Tren de Aragua Narcoterrorists in the SOUTHCOM area of responsibility,” Trump wrote on Truth Social.   Trump has designated Tren de Aragua, a criminal organization founded in Venezuela’s prisons, as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.   Video of the strike, shared on social media, shows a speedboat gliding through the water before bursting into flames.   https://t.co/o5xOQ6HRFg pic.twitter.com/s9ktAlDQUi— Marco Rubio (@marcorubio) September 2, 2025 Tren de Aragua is “operating under the control of Nicolas Maduro, responsible for mass murder, drug trafficking, sex trafficking, and acts of violence and terror across the United States and Western Hemisphere,” according to Trump.   Maduro is the dictator of the South American nation of Venezuela and has been acting as the nation’s president since 2013.   “The strike occurred while the terrorists were at sea in international waters transporting illegal narcotics, heading to the United States,” according to Trump. “The strike resulted in 11 terrorists killed in action. No U.S. Forces were harmed in this strike.”  “Please let this serve as notice to anybody even thinking about bringing drugs into the United States of America,” Trump wrote, adding: “BEWARE! Thank you for your attention to this matter!!!!!!!!!!!”   ? pic.twitter.com/GuU5tCrLME— Virginia Allen (@Virginia_Allen5) September 2, 2025 The cartels and various criminal organizations are increasingly transporting drugs in boats following the crackdown at the southern border since Trump returned to the White House on Jan. 20.   The Caribbean has become a hot spot for drug smuggling, given that travel from Puerto Rico to the U.S. is domestic.   Most of the drugs entering Puerto Rico are smuggled in via boat, according to Chief Patrol Agent Reggie Johnson of the Ramey Sector, which includes the Caribbean. Once inside the U.S. territory, he says it is easier for smugglers to get the drugs to the U.S. mainland, because flights are domestic from the Caribbean into the U.S.    The Caribbean’s geographical location makes it a prime region for drug smuggling, according to Johnson. Specifically, Puerto Rico can be thought of as a “bridge to the U.S.,” because it is geographically close to Venezuela, Colombia, and the Dominican Republic—high drug-producing nations, Johnson says.   The U.S. has been building up its naval presence in the southern Caribbean in recent weeks to address the threat of drug smuggling. Maduro has been critical of the action, claiming the U.S. is seeking to bring about a regime change in Venezuela.   Maduro has deployed troops along its coastline and its border with Colombia. During a press conference Monday, the Venezuelan dictator said that in the “face of this maximum military pressure, we have declared maximum preparedness for the defense of Venezuela.”   The U.S. has not indicated any plans to launch an attack on Venezuela.   The post WATCH: Speedboat Said to Be Carrying Venezuelan ‘Narcoterrorists’ in Caribbean Destroyed on Trump’s Order appeared first on The Daily Signal.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. A long-awaited decision from US District Judge Amit Mehta has imposed new restrictions on Google intended to curb its dominance in the online search market, but the tech giant avoided the most extreme penalties the federal government had requested, such as a forced breakup. Judge Mehta ruled that Google must stop entering exclusive agreements that cover its main products, including Google Search, Chrome, Google Assistant, and the Gemini app. However, the company will not be required to sell off major assets like the Chrome browser or the Android operating system, which the Justice Department argued were central to restoring fair competition. We obtained a copy of the ruling for you here. “Plaintiffs overreached in seeking forced divestiture of these key assets, which Google did not use to effect any illegal restraints,” Mehta wrote in Tuesday’s decision. The ruling, which spans 230 pages, ends a legal battle that began five years ago during the first Trump administration. The case marked the Justice Department’s first major antitrust challenge in decades and targeted the core of Google’s business strategy. Mehta had previously concluded that Google used unlawful methods to preserve its dominance by securing default placement on devices through massive contracts with companies like Apple and Samsung. Despite that finding, his final order reflects a more restrained approach. He pointed to the evolving digital landscape and the rapid emergence of artificial intelligence as key factors influencing his judgment. “There are strong reasons not to jolt the system and to allow market forces to do the work,” Mehta wrote. While Google will no longer be allowed to enter exclusive search engine deals, the company can continue arranging for its services to be the default option on browsers and smartphones, as long as those deals are not exclusive. The court rejected a blanket ban on payments to partners, noting that such a move could disrupt markets and harm consumers. “Cutting off payments from Google almost certainly will impose substantial — in some cases, crippling — downstream harms,” the ruling stated. The judge also ordered Google to make portions of its search index and certain user interaction data available to competitors. However, this requirement was scaled back compared to what the Justice Department had originally proposed. Mehta explained that the relief should directly address the unlawful behavior without extending beyond what is necessary. Alphabet, the parent company of Google, saw its stock rise more than 6 percent in after-hours trading after the order was released. During the remedies phase of the case, held earlier this year, artificial intelligence emerged as a central theme. Despite the DOJ’s calls for structural remedies, Mehta rejected the idea of breaking up Google. He said Chrome is not a standalone business and remains deeply integrated into Google’s overall operations. Requiring its divestiture would be, in his words, “incredibly messy.” He also emphasized the difficulty of crafting remedies in a rapidly evolving technology market. “Here the court is asked to gaze into a crystal ball and look to the future,” Mehta wrote. “Not exactly a judge’s forte.” Google had argued throughout the trial that the government’s proposals would effectively dismantle its search business. The final order will remain in place for six years, though it may be put on hold while Google pursues an appeal. The company has already indicated plans to challenge the ruling. Google’s legal troubles are not over. In a separate ruling earlier this year, a federal judge in Virginia found the company maintained an illegal monopoly in parts of the online advertising market. A hearing to determine potential remedies in that case is scheduled for September. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post Judge Imposes Curbs on Google Search Deals, Rejects DOJ’s Push for Breakup in Landmark Antitrust Ruling appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

At DogingtonPost, we believe that understanding your furry friend is key to a harmonious relationship. Dogs communicate through a rich tapestry of behaviors, from tail wags to barks and subtle body language cues. In this guide, we’ll explore common dog habits explained, helping you decipher what your canine companion is trying to tell you. What Does Your Dog’s Tail Really Say? The Complex Language of Tail Wagging A wagging tail doesn’t always indicate a happy dog. Tail movements form a complex language that conveys a range of emotions from joy to fear, and even aggression. Speed and Direction: Key Indicators The speed and direction of a tail wag reveal much about your dog’s state of mind. A study published in Current Biology found that dogs wag their tails to the right when they feel happy or excited, and to the left when they experience anxiety or want to withdraw from a situation. Fast wagging usually points to excitement, while slower wags might signal insecurity or a tentative greeting. Tail Position Speaks Volumes The position of your dog’s tail matters as much as its movement. A tail held high often shows confidence or alertness, while a tail tucked between the legs clearly signals fear or submission. A study in the Journal of Veterinary Behavior noted that dogs with tails held horizontally often display a neutral or curious state. Context: The Missing Puzzle Piece Always consider the context when you interpret tail movements. A slightly raised, slowly wagging tail might indicate your dog’s uncertainty about a situation. On the other hand, a tail held straight out and wagging stiffly could warn of potential aggression. The American Kennel Club advises owners to look at the whole dog (not just the tail) to accurately understand their pet’s emotional state. To become fluent in your pet’s unique tail language, spend time observing your dog’s tail in different situations. This practice will improve communication and strengthen the bond between you and your furry friend. As we move from tail talk to vocal communication, let’s explore how our canine companions use barks, whines, and other sounds to express themselves. What’s Your Dog Trying to Tell You? Decoding Canine Communication Dogs use a variety of vocalizations to express themselves. Understanding these sounds can significantly improve your relationship with your furry friend. The Language of Barks Dogs bark for various reasons, and the pitch, volume, and frequency of their barks can reveal a lot. A study published in the journal Animal Cognition found that humans can accurately identify the context of a dog’s bark 63% of the time. High-pitched, repetitive barks often signal excitement or a desire to play. In contrast, deep, prolonged barks may indicate a perceived threat or discomfort. Beyond Barking: Other Canine Sounds While barking is the most common form of dog vocalization, it’s not the only one. Whining can express anxiety, excitement, or a need for attention. A low growl typically serves as a warning sign (but it can also occur during play). Howling, often associated with wolves, can function as a form of long-distance communication or a response to high-pitched sounds. Strategies for Managing Excessive Barking Excessive barking can become a nuisance, but it’s important to address the root cause rather than just try to silence your dog. The American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (ASPCA) recommends identifying and removing the motivation behind the barking. For example, if your dog barks at passersby, limit their view of the street. Training techniques can also help manage barking. The ASPCA suggests teaching your dog to sit and stay when meeting people at the door, giving them an alternative behavior to barking and reducing their excitement level. For persistent barking issues, consider consulting a professional dog trainer or behaviorist. They can provide personalized strategies tailored to your dog’s specific needs and temperament. Vocalization is a natural part of dog behavior. Our goal is to help you understand and manage it, not eliminate it entirely. As you learn to interpret your dog’s vocal cues, you’ll become better equipped to meet their needs and strengthen your bond. Now, let’s turn our attention to another crucial aspect of canine communication: body language. How to Read Your Dog’s Body Language Dogs communicate primarily through nonverbal cues. Their body language reveals much about their emotional state and intentions. Understanding these silent signals will improve your relationship with your furry friend. The Telltale Ears A dog’s ears express a lot. Most dogs point their ears up and forward when alert and interested. This often occurs when they hear an unusual noise or notice something intriguing. Ears pulled back against the head indicate fear or submission. Flattened ears signal anxiety or stress. A study in the Journal of Veterinary Behavior found that dogs with floppy ears (like Basset Hounds) still move their ears in similar patterns, albeit less noticeably. Owners should pay attention to even subtle ear movements in their dogs. The Windows to the Soul Eye contact and facial expressions play a key role in canine communication. Direct, intense eye contact can signal dominance or aggression in dogs. If your dog maintains prolonged eye contact with another dog, you might need to intervene to prevent a potential conflict. Soft eyes and frequent blinking often indicate a relaxed, friendly state. The American Kennel Club notes that dogs who turn their heads away or show the whites of their eyes (known as “whale eye”) may feel uncomfortable or anxious. A relaxed, open mouth typically indicates a content dog. However, repeated lip-licking when no food is present could signal stress or discomfort. Stance Speaks Volumes A dog’s overall posture tells you a lot about their mood. A confident, happy dog often stands tall with evenly distributed weight. They might lean forward slightly, indicating interest in their surroundings. A fearful or submissive dog may lower their body, tuck their tail, and even roll onto their back. While often misinterpreted as a request for belly rubs, this actually signals extreme submission or fear. Always respect your dog’s space when they display this behavior. Interpreting dog language is crucial for understanding your pet’s needs and emotions. A wagging tail combined with a tense body and flattened ears paints a very different picture than a wagging tail with relaxed posture and soft eyes. Observing your dog’s ear positions, facial expressions, and overall posture will provide valuable insights into their emotional state. This understanding allows you to respond appropriately to your dog’s needs (whether that means providing comfort, giving space, or engaging in play). Every dog is unique, so take the time to learn your individual pet’s body language cues for the strongest bond possible. Final Thoughts Understanding your dog’s behaviors forms the foundation of a strong bond with your furry friend. We explained common dog habits to help you interpret tail wags, vocalizations, and body language. This knowledge allows you to respond to your dog’s needs, whether they feel anxious, playful, or content. Every dog has a unique personality with individual quirks. You’ll become fluent in your pet’s language through careful observation and patience. Watch your dog in different situations and notice how they react to various stimuli (this practice will improve your understanding over time). We at DogingtonPost want to help you become the best dog owner possible. Our platform offers many resources on dog care, health, and behavior to support your journey. As you learn and grow with your furry companion, remember that understanding leads to a truly special human-canine relationship.