This has the internet talking! On Wednesday afternoon, it was disclosed that the White House has purchased two domains that involve aliens. The first domain that was purchased was aliens.gov, and the second was aliens.gov. Take a look: As reporting by Steven Greenstreet: 'The White House and the Executive Office of the President has registered the websites https://t.co/BZK9dh18Kh and https://t.co/vp3nMhvH8d' pic.twitter.com/PI4WlFS2Gq — Christopher Sharp (@ChrisUKSharp) March 18, 2026 Yahoo News reported more on the White House buying the domains: The Executive Office of the President quietly registered the domain aliens.gov on Wednesday, just after 6:30 a.m.—and while the site sits empty for now, the move didn’t go unnoticed. A domain-monitoring bot flagged the registration. No website, no announcement, no explanation. Just a domain. Decrypt has reached out to the White House for comment, and will update this story if we hear anything back. 404 Media first reported on the registration, following the bot flag. The registration comes roughly a month after Trump posted on Truth Social that he would direct the Defense Department and other federal agencies to “begin the process of identifying and releasing” all government files related to alien life, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and UFOs. That announcement was itself triggered by something stranger: a podcast clip of Barack Obama saying, offhandedly, that aliens are “real.” Obama later clarified on Instagram that he was talking about statistical probability—the universe is big, life probably exists somewhere—and that he saw zero evidence of extraterrestrials making contact during his presidency. “Really!” he added, as if anticipating the chaos that would follow. Earlier in the year, President Trump chastised Obama for discussing aliens because the information was classified. Take a look: BREAKING: Trump says Obama made a "big mistake" by revealing "classified information" that aliens are real.pic.twitter.com/Dv9UvmxkHa — Polymarket (@Polymarket) February 19, 2026 Here’s what Trump was responding to: Barack Obama on aliens: “They’re real” “But I haven’t seen them. They’re not being kept at Area 51. There’s no underground facility — unless there’s this enormous conspiracy and they hid it from the President of the United States.” pic.twitter.com/c6t0DYxewU — UAP James (@UAPJames) February 14, 2026 PBS reported that President Trump previously ordered the Pentagon to release all the files it had on aliens: President Donald Trump said Thursday that he’s directing the Pentagon and other government agencies to identify and release files related to extraterrestrials and UFOs because of “tremendous interest.” Trump made the announcement in a social media post hours after he accused former President Barack Obama of disclosing “classified information” when Obama recently suggested in a podcast interview that aliens were real. Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One, “I don’t know if they’re real or not,” and said of Obama, “I may get him out of trouble by declassifying.” In a post on his social media platform Thursday night, Trump said he was directing government agencies to release files related “to alien and extraterrestrial life, unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP), and unidentified flying objects (UFOs), and any and all other information connected to these highly complex, but extremely interesting and important, matters.” Obama, who made his comments in a podcast appearance over the weekend, later clarified that he had not seen evidence that aliens “have made contact with us,” but said, “statistically, the universe is so vast that the odds are good there’s life out there.”

'a lot of political messaging'

For Americans who rely on federal affordability programs, access to a working phone is often determined by whether providers continue operating within those programs. As broader subsidies narrowed, Lifeline remained one of the primary federal options supporting basic communication access. This shift made the role of Lifeline providers more visible, particularly those with the ability […]

Choosing between inpatient and outpatient rehab is one of the most important decisions a person can make on the road to recovery. The right level of care can mean the difference between lasting sobriety and a continued cycle of relapse. A reliable addiction treatment center conducts thorough assessments to match each individual with the specific […]

On Sunday's The Weekend: Primetime, MS NOW hosts gave no pushback as left-wing activist Cameron Kasky (one of the Parkland student anti-gun activists) obnoxiously compared Israeli troops to gunmen who attack schools in the U.S. and murder children. He even accused Israel of committing "genocide" in Gaza. How tone-deaf does that sound after all the children Hamas murdered on October 7?  In the same segment, fill-in co-host Melissa Murray hinted that pro-life conservatives are being hypocritical by defending the war in Iran. Co-host Ayman Mohyeldin set up the segment by claiming that Republicans have shown an "indifference" to the "suffering of children" on issues ranging from wars in the Middle East to Jeffrey Epstein, and showed clips of Republicans defending the war in Iran in light of a girls school being bombed allegedly by the U.S. military. The MS NOW host asked Kasky for his reaction, posing: You survived a tragedy, and we were talking about tragedies that children have suffered around the world and here at home -- certainly school shootings probably on top of that list where we -- all we hear at the end of them are thoughts and prayers. But what do you make of how Republicans have reacted to this school shooting [sic] and to the suffering of children, whether it's at ICE, Iran, Gaza or school shootings? In a CNN town hall in 2018, Kasky looked Marco Rubio in the eye and compared him to the Parkland school shooter, Niklas Cruz. So this smear of Israel came naturally: Well, my classmates and I learned the hard way years ago how indifferent American lawmakers can be when children are dying. But there is a very important distinction to make here, which is that the shooter who killed 17 people at my high school was apprehended by law enforcement and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Over 105 children have been murdered by Israeli forces in Lebanon in just the past 10 days alone. And while people marched in the streets for my classmates, who is speaking for these children in Lebanon? He soon tied in race: "In this country, a certain type of child dying is a tragedy, but, elsewhere in the world, if it's brown Muslim children, it means nothing..." A bit later, he complained: "And in America, the Parkland shooter is looked at as a villain, but, in the state of Israel, the people who are killing these innocents are brave, heroic warriors. And frankly, I think that that is disgusting." Later on, Kasky again focused on race, noting that the media had given coverage to "crying white mothers," and then tried to link guns involved in school shootings to guns used by the military in the Middle East: We were the next school shooting -- we were the next community where the news was going to come and film crying white mothers and tell America how sad this was. And we got together and we said, "No, we want people to see how angry we are because this was expected, and this is something that we allow in this country." And this -- this weapon that was used to shoot up our high school was manufactured by the same arms manufacturers that are selling weapons overseas. So this is all tied together. This -- this is just an industry. This violence is a business. Murray then jumped in and tried to tie in the abortion issue: And there's a selective appetite for certain kinds of violence. So the same people who would condone what is happening in Iran or what is happening in Gaza are the same people who have decried the violence to the fetus and talked about their abortion politics for years and years even as you and your classmates cowered under your desk. For your generation, how do you look at the sort of both sides of this political moment and the quote, unquote, party of life? At the end of the segment, after Kasky made his "genocide" accusation, co-host Catherine Rampell jumped in and contradicted Kasky's premise that white victims in the U.S. always get plenty of attention as she complained that the attack on a synagogue in Michigan has been forgotten too quickly, and called out Democrats who have shown sympathy for the terrorist. Transcript follows: MS NOW's The Weekend: Primetime March 15, 2026 7:37 p.m. AYMAN MOHYELDIN: Now, this indifference that you heard there to the suffering of children isn't really exclusive to Iran. We've seen it in Gaza, where Republicans like Congressman Randy Fine told Palestinian children to, quote, starve away amid reports of an ongoing famine. And we've seen it closer to home with the Trump administration's cruel treatment of hundreds of detained migrant children. It's also evident in the indifference towards the Epstein survivors, many of whom were minors, when they were abused by the late sex offender and his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell. Their fight for justice continues to fall on deaf ears in the Republican-controlled White House and Congress. Republicans like to pretend that they care about the children. But whether it's Iran, Gaza, ICE or Epstein, for them, children are merely collateral damage. (...) MOHYELDIN: You survived a tragedy, and we were talking about tragedies that children have suffered around the world and here at home -- certainly school shootings probably on top of that list where we -- all we hear at the end of them are thoughts and prayers. But what do you make of how Republicans have reacted to this school shooting [sic] and to the suffering of children, whether it's at ICE, Iran, Gaza or school shootings? CAMERON KASKY, HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVIST: Well, my classmates and I learned the hard way years ago how indifferent American lawmakers can be when children are dying. But there is a very important distinction to make here, which is that the shooter who killed 17 people at my high school was apprehended by law enforcement and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Over 105 children have been murdered by Israeli forces in Lebanon in just the past 10 days alone. And while people marched in the streets for my classmates, who is speaking for these children in Lebanon? Who -- where is their voice? Where is the outrage about those deaths? In this country, a certain type of child dying is a tragedy, but, elsewhere in the world, if it's brown Muslim children, it means nothing -- it's negligible -- people just kind of shrug it off. (...) Look, I survived the Parkland shooting -- I was there. I was also in Palestine, and I can promise you something: The feeling my classmates and I had of uncertainty of maybe the next person we see is going to be the person who's going to shoot us dead, that is all the children in Palestine know. That is all they've known for their entire lives. And in America, the Parkland shooter is looked at as a villain, but, in the state of Israel, the people who are killing these innocents are brave, heroic warriors. And frankly, I think that that is disgusting. ANTONIA HYLTON: Cameron, can I ask you for you personally and then also just for young people of your generation, what has it done to you to grow up experiencing these things -- to see these images -- to understand war, I think, in a way that's different from previous generations? (...) KASKY: Well, violence is one of the only things that America is capable of manufacturing anymore. And that is something my classmates and I saw our entire lives. We were born right after Columbine -- Sandy Hook shooting happened when we were fairly young. The Aurora shooting happened when we were locked in our classrooms. Hiding under our desks, we had no question as to what was going on. We were the next school shooting -- we were the next community where the news was going to come and film crying white mothers and tell America how sad this was. And we got together and we said, "No, we want people to see how angry we are because this was expected, and this is something that we allow in this country." And this -- this weapon that was used to shoot up our high school was manufactured by the same arms manufacturers that are selling weapons overseas. So this is all tied together. This -- this is just an industry. This violence is a business. MELISSA MURRAY: Well, it's also a politics, though. And there's a selective appetite for certain kinds of violence. So the same people who would condone what is happening in Iran or what is happening in Gaza are the same people who have decried the violence to the fetus and talked about their abortion politics for years and years even as you and your classmates cowered under your desk. For your generation, how do you look at the sort of both sides of this political moment and the quote, unquote, party of life? KASKY: Well, we know that the Republican party and also a lot of people in the Democratic party weigh lives differently. It's just things have changed. Gaza very much changed the world order because there used to be something called rules of engagement. When we were at war, there were certain rules that needed to be followed, and there were certain protections that needed to be in place for the civilian population. Gaza was very much a laboratory where the world was experimenting. There are military lawyers who are studying Gaza and the international world's response and saying, "Wait a second, these laws in place, these international laws that were put there after World War II to create something of a world order, these don't really apply anymore." So now you have the U.S. most likely bombing this school in Iran, and we're using the same playbook that the state of Israel has used during the ongoing genocide in Gaza. It is either, "These people who were killed deserved it, and they were a valid target, this didn't actually happen at all -- it's a lie," or, "This was actually the enemy -- we didn't do this." And very often you don't even need to coordinate these responses. It's either, "Oh, there were actually terrorists there. Oh, these people deserved it." CATHERINE RAMPELL: It's -- I mean, there's some of this happening here too. I'm sorry. KASKY: Tell me more. RAMPELL: I don't know, there was a would be terrorist who tried to shoot up a Jewish preschool three days ago and -- KASKY: And was apprehended and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. RAMPELL: And there are liberal mayors in Michigan who are saying -- suggesting that it was okay or that there were mitigating factors because he had some family members who were killed recently, who the state of Lebanon has said may have been members of Hezbollah. So like the idea that we care about Americans, we, you know, we always care about Americans, and we don't care about brown children abroad. We should care about all children, and it is very upsetting to me repeatedly that we keep on -- we keep on ignoring the fact that there was literally an attempted mass shooting a few days ago that is being excused by a number of Democrats in Michigan because those kids were Jewish who had nothing to do with Israel. Sorry. We had a conversation about this last night, and I feel like the same thing happened then, but. KASKY: Well, there's no excuse for terror. RAMPELL: There's no excuse for terror, and we should condemn it, regardless of the religion or the race or the nationality of the children who are being targeted. That's that's all I have to say. KASKY: And I happen to agree.

Kick up your recliner chairs because you’re not going to believe this one! TIME magazine is out with a new report prophesying that climate change threatens to make us all lazy slobs! “Scientists Warn of Health Risks As Climate Change Reduces Physical Activity,” read the knee-slapper headline from TIME reporter Simmone Shah. Shah waved around a new wacky study published in Lancet Global Health to foam at the mouth over how “rising global temperatures due to climate change could lead millions of people to be less physically active” and will supposedly lead to an increase of half a million deaths by 2050. Yes, they’re actually projecting this nonsense out 24 years into the future, giving the misleading implication that humanity writ large is completely incapable of adaptation.  But as Hoover Institution Visiting Fellow Bjorn Lomborg argued in November 2022, “Around the world, far more people die each year from cold than heat.” And that’s according to — get this — another report by The Lancet that Lomborg cited at the time. So which is it? Climate Depot founder Marc Morano blasted Shah’s propaganda in comments to MRC Business. “Here we go again. TIME magazine just keeps churning out the most simplistic climate fears based on ‘models’ and ‘projections.’ It’s hard to believe that the magazine can even write this stuff anymore.” Countering Shah’s underlying thesis, Morano retorted, “What if we work out in air conditioning? Wouldn’t AC make this argument moot?” But as Morano pointed out to MRC, Shah is on record pushing to get rid of AC units too, as her February 2026 headline clearly illustrated: “New Study Finds Air Conditioners Will Exacerbate Climate Change As Planet Warms.” Incredible.  In her latest piece, Shah apparently forgot that correlation doesn’t equal causation, and used the climate change boondoggle to lecture readers about the dangers of obesity, which now is apparently being worsened by Mother Earth's wrath: Physical activity plays a crucial role in overall health and wellbeing. Limiting the amount you move your body is associated with reduced muscular strength, impaired cognition, and poor sleep, all of which can translate into lower on-the-job performance and higher absenteeism. Inactivity is also one of the leading modifiable risk factors for non-communicable diseases like raised blood pressure, high cholesterol, and obesity. It’s not until the fifth paragraph of Shah’s eco-bile that an important caveat to the study’s underlying conclusions was noted: “The study did not reveal an impact in high-income countries, where adaptive measures are more likely to be in place.” Eureka! Who knew humans can adapt!  Did Shah bother to mention who financed this so-called study to begin with? Nope. One of the major backers of this study was The Wellcome Trust, an eco-activist global foundation that partnered with the climate-fanatic Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2024 to “accelerate global health equity” in part by “Advancing climate data, sustainable agriculture, and food systems. To better protect people globally from the devastating effects of climate change on health, solutions that draw across climate, health, and agricultural science will be needed.” Stranger still is that this connection wasn’t enough for the authors of the latest climate-causes-laziness study to admit that Wellcome’s involvement presented somewhat of a conflict of interest.  “Rising temperatures create inopportune circumstances for exercise,” Shah railed, apparently ignorant to how sweating works. “Heat exposure is linked to elevated cardiovascular strain and heightened perceived exertion, along with dehydration, heat cramps, and heat exhaustion. Researchers found that if the world reaches 2°C above preindustrial temperatures, more than a quarter of the global population could experience an extra month of severe heat stress each year,” she continued.   That’s interesting, because as Muay Thai cardio kickboxing studio Hit House analyzed April 2024, “you may gain significant benefits by working out in the heat, such as an increase in oxygen, blood volume, and temperature tolerance. You may find that the changes give you a larger reserve of strength and stamina for exercise or your favorite sport.” Cleveland Clinic also noted in 2020 that “Warm, sunny days are perfect for outdoor exercise.” Even Outside Magazine reported in 2016 that “Heat training not only does a better job at increasing V02 [volume of oxygen] max than altitude, but it also makes athletes better at withstanding a wider range of temperatures.” Who knew! Does this mean you should exercise to the point of heat exhaustion? Not at all, but Shah’s insinuation that the exact opposite could happen (wearing out the La-Z-Boy chairs) due to climate change is overreaching conjecture at the least and lowbrow scareporn at best.  As Morano concluded: Even Time cannot stand behind their usual tripe anymore, noting that the idea that we are all going to be sloths by midcentury are only based on ‘a projection, and there is still some uncertainty about the exact real-world impacts.’ 

Newsom Press Office Crotch-Kicks Themselves Attempting to Own Critics of the Latest Calif. Boondoggle

US Surgeon Says Israel Bombed His Vacation Apartment in Beirut With Weapons Paid for by His Taxes