'Immigration system has to be fixed'

Presidents have historically used the State of the Union address to set the stage for major public policies and campaign shifts, and reflect on the mood of the country.  As President Donald Trump prepares to give his first State of the Union address of his second term on Tuesday, here is a look back at seven significant moments from past addresses.  1.  Monroe Doctrine President James Monroe’s 1823 State of the Union address delivered to Congress in writing–as was customary for more than 100 years–established a core element of American foreign policy in modern times.  The Monroe Doctrine today asserts a national interest over the Western Hemisphere. The Trump administration recently touted an updated Monroe Doctrine to work with countries in North and South America to combat international criminal organizations. The doctrine was cited with regard to the capture of Venezuelan dictator Nicolás Maduro.  In Monroe’s day, it asserted the Western Hemisphere was closed to further European colonization. For its part, the United States pledged not to interfere in European affairs.  Monroe wrote to Congress, “as a principle in which the rights and interests of the United States are involved, that the American continents, by the free and independent condition which they have assumed and maintain, are henceforth not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers.” 2. ‘Last Best Hope’  In the midst of the Civil War, Abraham Lincoln’s written State of the Union on Dec. 1, 1862, made the case that saving the union meant abolishing slavery.  “Without slavery the rebellion could never have existed; without slavery it could not continue,” Lincoln asserted about two months after signing the Emancipation Proclamation.  Lincoln called for a gradual and compensated emancipation.  “In giving freedom to the slave, we assure freedom to the free, honorable alike in what we give, and what we preserve,” Lincoln said. “We shall nobly save, or meanly lose, the last best hope of earth.” 3. ‘Not Good’ No matter who is in the White House, the most common description the president gives of the country is “strong.”  In 1975, President Gerald Ford, having assumed the office the previous August after the resignation of Richard Nixon over the Watergate scandal, was more frank with the country.  On top of disenchantment with government over both the scandal and the Vietnam War, the public was also facing economic hardship. “I must say to you that the state of the Union is not good,” Ford said on Jan. 15 before the joint session of Congress. “Millions of Americans are out of work. Recession and inflation are eroding the money of millions more.”  But he concluded the speech on a positive note, saying America was taking a new direction to “put the unemployed back to work; increase real income and production; restrain the growth of federal government spending; achieve energy independence; and advance the cause of world understanding.” 4. ‘Seven Challenger Heroes’ President Ronald Reagan was scheduled to deliver his 1986 State of the Union address on Jan. 28, but earlier that day, the space shuttle Challenger exploded after takeoff, killing seven. Reagan instead delivered an Oval Office address that evening. The State of the Union was moved to Feb. 4, 1986, where Reagan opened saying, “Thank you for allowing me to delay my address until this evening.”  “We paused together to mourn and honor the valor of our seven Challenger heroes, and I hope that we are now ready to do what they would want us to do,” Reagan said. “Go forward, America, and reach for the stars.” 5. ‘Era of Big Government Is Over’ Democrats had celebrated big government since the days of Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt. So, it was a little surprising when Bill Clinton–running for re-election–declared an end to big government.  “We have worked to give the American people a smaller, less bureaucratic government in Washington, and we have to give the American people one that lives within its means,” said Clinton before Congress and the American public on Jan. 23, 1996. “The era of big government is over. But we cannot go back to the time when our citizens were left to fend for themselves.” 6. ‘Axis of Evil’ On Jan. 29, 2002, President George W. Bush delivered his first State of the Union address, months after the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attack and in the lead up to the U.S. invasion of Iraq. Bush discussed Iraq, North Korea, and Iran.  “North Korea is a regime arming with missiles and weapons of mass destruction, while starving its citizens,” Bush said. “Iran aggressively pursues these weapons and exports terror. … Iraq continues to flaunt its hostility toward America and to support terror.” Bush added, “States like these and their terrorist allies constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world.” 7. Alito Fact-Checks Obama  On Jan. 27, 2010, President Barack Obama scolded the Supreme Court for its ruling in the Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission campaign finance case. Justices ruled that corporations, unions, and advocacy groups could make independent political expenditures in support of or in opposition to candidates under the First Amendment.  “With all due deference to separation of powers, last week, the Supreme Court reversed a century of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests, including foreign corporations, to spend without limit in our elections,” Obama said.  Justice Samuel Alito, who sided with the majority, was seen mouthing the words, “Not true.” The post 7 Historic Moments From State of the Union Addresses appeared first on The Daily Signal.

A Civilized France Is Rapidly Slipping Away

Self-Described Terrorist Carries Out Car Attack in Nevada

The Wall Street Journal has promoted itself as the "Daily Diary of the American Dream," as a promoter of national prosperity. But some columnists find the titans of capitalism too unseemly to support any more.  The Journal’s "Heard on the Street" columnist Carol Ryan threw down the gauntlet against the “superwealthy” in her February 18 screed headlined, “Billionaires’ Low Taxes Are Becoming a Problem for the Economy.” Ryan used California — yes, Gavin Newsom’s tax-worshipping California — as an example of a lefty-run state doing the brave thing by sticking it to the affluent, even if the method is flawed. “California’s plan to hit its richest residents with a one-off wealth tax is a long shot, and its design has problems,” Ryan began. “But a look at who picks up the tab when billionaires scrimp on taxes, and how wealth concentration is affecting the wider economy, shows why the issue isn’t going away.” Ah, so California’s addressing the right problem but using a flawed mechanism to do it, eh? So do we just need to find out how to more efficiently raise taxes so the administrative framework is better? Good grief. Somebody want to page Lachlan Murdoch and tell him to go pick up his newspaper? Ryan highlighted how “California has the highest concentration of billionaires in the U.S. with 255 individuals, or slightly more than a fifth of the country’s billionaire population, data from wealth-intelligence firm Altrata shows.” But, of course, she underplayed the fact that billionaires are currently fleeing the state of California for states like Nevada and Florida precisely because the former isn’t satisfied with maintaining its top position as the state with the highest income tax rate (13.3 percent) as of 2025. And this is not even counting California’s outrageous sales and use tax rate range between 7.25 percent on the low end and 11.25 percent on the high end. Ryan selected as an expert Ray Madoff from Boston College, who loathes the wealthy enough to be featured on National Public Radio, talking about how all this unfairness creates an "appetite for change." Technology firm Atom founder Zain Aziz told Business Insider February 8 that “[y]ou don't really want to get punished if you do good and you create more jobs." He continued, praising his new Nevada home: “I believe the Las Vegas Valley has become more and more what's synonymous with what California used to be — which was free-spirited and 'Come and achieve the impossible.’” Apparently this was lost on Ryan, who fear-mongered that the “The risk is that the U.S. economy becomes increasingly dependent on a narrow group of very rich households, whose spending is tied to the performance of the stock market.” The only issues Ryan bothered pointing out with wealth taxes writ large is that they “are hard to administer, and the ultrarich can simply leave if they don’t like where a state’s tax policies are headed.” But she mentioned nothing about the complexities of appropriately evaluating an income-earner's assets (wealth) due to their inherently subjective nature to begin with. It’s not until the 11th paragraph that Ryan concedes that the tax code may have something to do with why billionaires are able to capitalize on the benefits their armies of accountants rifle through on a routine basis. She cited and then dismissed the fact that the top earners in the U.S. pay 40 percent of federal income taxes while another 40 percent of Americans in lower brackets pay nothing. It doesn't matter because “billionaires aren’t captured by this picture because most of their wealth lies outside the income-tax system.”  But if top earners are still paying the vast amount of income taxes anyway with a complicated tax code while the bottom 40 percent are paying nothing, then how is this dramatic tax evasion? She didn’t mention that California alone has a whopping 2,910 pages in its 2025 tax code, separate from the over 6,000 pages that make up the federal tax code. That means Californians are stuck facing around a daunting 8,910 pages of tax code on an annual basis, and Ryan appears to be arguing that complicating it further with a stupid wealth tax is somehow meritorious in its intent if overtly flawed in its “design.” The Tax Foundation released a study in 2024 finding that many “Wealth taxes disincentivize entrepreneurship, leading to less innovation and less long-term growth. A wealth tax reduces wages, destroys jobs, and reduces the stock of capital. All income groups are worse off under a wealth tax due to decreased economic activity.” One would think Ryan would consider that billionaires leaving California because of the risk of complicating an already complex tax code is proof in the pudding of the Tax Foundation’s thesis. But alas, she was rooting for the Left to win with their "populist measures" to tax the rich. But the very fact of the rising concentration of wealth in the hands of the superwealthy means the issue of how to tax it won’t be going away, and pressure could build for ever-more populist measures, including at the national level.    Pathetic. 

So-called "ghost students" are reportedly fueling a growing financial aid fraud crisis in the Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system and across the country.These ghost students allegedly steal identities to enroll online and apply for taxpayer-funded financial aid.'These fraudsters are very well organized and well financed.'KSTP reported in October that the Minnesota State system, which consists of 33 colleges and universities, had flagged over 7,700 “fraudulent” or “potentially fraudulent” financial aid applications in the 2024-2025 academic year. In nearly 95% of those cases, the ghost students had applied to two-year community colleges. The fraud was identified before any money was distributed.KSTP discovered two cases in which funds were distributed to fraudsters who had enrolled in a community college. The cases came to light after a man in Hutchinson, Kansas, reported that someone had used his name and Social Security number to collect $13,000. Another individual stated that his information was used to take out two student loans worth over $6,700. A Minnesota State spokesperson told KSTP in October that at least three schools had paid between $9,500 and $63,500 back to the federal government after discovering ghost students. Craig Munson, the chief information security officer for the Minnesota State system, addressed the ongoing fraud issues during a Thursday Minnesota House hearing. “These fraudsters are very well organized and well financed,” Munson said. “Stealing money that was intended for real students in need of financial aid.”RELATED: The insane little story that failed to warn America about the depth of Somali fraud Photo by JHU Sheridan Libraries/Gado/Getty ImagesWhen questioned about how much the fraud scheme has cost the Minnesota State system, Munson did not provide a dollar amount but noted that he believes “we are making very good progress” in addressing the issue.Munson explained that the school system is still seeing a similar number of fraud cases, but that ghost students are now targeting more four-year colleges and universities.RELATED: Tim Walz's nightmare continues as HHS shuts off $185M to Minnesota amid allegedly 'fake' Somali day care centers Photo by: Jumping Rocks/Universal Images Group via Getty Images“It used to be more of the two-year [colleges], we’re starting to see they’re looking at all colleges and universities,” he said. “It could be a couple of reasons — that they’ve learned the system to its extent, and they want to extend their stay in the system and transfer to a four-year possibly. We’re also seeing some positive reports that many of our two-year colleges are seeing a little bit of a reduction in these fraud attempts.”During Thursday’s hearing, Munson presented a fraud report detailing the growing threat and recommendations to address it, including implementing an automated identity-proofing system that would cost $1 million to $1.5 million per year. A spokesperson for the Minnesota State system told Blaze News that enrollment fraud is a problem for colleges and universities across the nation. “The Minnesota State IT Services team has implemented a variety of safeguards to protect against this threat," the spokesperson stated. "Nationally, there has been a significant rise in this activity and we have been working to install additional safeguards and provide guidance to our 33 colleges and universities for the last two years. Our schools, in partnership with faculty, have been actively managing this problem, identifying ghost students early in each semester and removing them from our systems to ensure only real students can get the classes they need and financial aid is distributed to the students who need it to achieve their academic goals.""In addition, this last fall a more formal Enrollment Fraud Working Group that includes experts in IT, Academic and Student Affairs, and Audit from the Minnesota State system office, as well as faculty, staff, and student representatives from throughout the system was formed. The goal of the group is to identify additional safeguards the colleges and universities of Minnesota State can put in place to keep ghost students out,” the spokesperson added.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Idaho police are trying to identify and locate a man who allegedly stole an ambulance and rammed it into a building housing a Department of Homeland Security office before failing to light it all on fire.The incident began at St. Luke's Hospital, where the suspect stole an ambulance, then crashed it into the lobby of the building on Wednesday at about 11 p.m. in Meridian, according to Meridian police. Meridian is a suburb of Boise.'If the suspect had not been interrupted, there is no doubt this building would have been burned, putting the lives of first responders and others at risk.' After he crashed the ambulance, the suspect retrieved cans with some sort of accelerant that were hidden in bushes and doused the vehicle with the substance, according to police."It appears the suspect was unable to ignite the accelerant before being scared off by responding agencies," said Meridian Police Chief Tracy Basterrechea in a statement.Police said the suspect was wearing a medical mask as well as a black shirt and tan pants.Basterrechea noted that there had been chatter online criticizing the presence of DHS at the building and called the incident a "serious criminal act."He also addressed "absolutely false" comments on social media denying that property damage is violence."This was absolutely an act of violence, and if the suspect had not been interrupted, there is no doubt this building would have been burned, putting the lives of first responders and others at risk," he added.Because the suspect had apparently planted the accelerant before stealing the ambulance and had driven about a quarter of a mile to the building with the DHS office, police believe the attack was intentional. Canyon County Paramedics issued a statement about the incident.RELATED: Video shows brawl after walkout student hits pro-ICE man — who is charged with child abuse "No Canyon County Paramedics personnel were inside the ambulance at the time of the incident," read the statement. "There are currently no confirmed injuries to members of the public or first responders connected to this event."Basterrechea said his department was leading the investigation, but they were cooperating with the Federal Bureau of Investigation as well as DHS and other agencies.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Back in the fall of 2025, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor was stripped of his royal titles and honors by King Charles III, due to ongoing controversy and persistent ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.This week, on his 66th birthday, the ex-Duke of York was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office related to his Epstein ties but released just hours later.When Glenn Beck heard the news of the disgraced former prince’s arrest, he was incredulous. “Notice: Nobody is going to jail for actually having sex with children. … [Mountbatten-Windsor] was arrested for ‘wrongdoing,”’ he says mockingly. “Well, I think having sex with underage kids is wrongdoing.”Glenn cites a recent Reuters poll that found that 69% of Americans strongly agree with the statement: “The files show that powerful people are rarely held accountable.” 17% somewhat agreed with the statement, and only 11% disagreed.“This is universal,” says Glenn, “and yet all that we're seeing is people playing politics with it.”On February 16, a panel of independent U.N. human rights experts declared that the content within the Epstein files may constitute “crimes against humanity.”“That's the U.N. — crimes against humanity! But who was having sex with kids?” Glenn exclaims.Every time more information about Epstein comes out, we’re left with “more questions,” never actual answers, he laments.“They release stuff and you're like, wait a minute. Well, that just opens up more. It's not clarity. It's fog. And it's happening everywhere — both sides of the Atlantic,” he says, citing the U.K.'s long-running grooming-gangs scandal, where Parliament voted down a Conservative push for a national inquiry in January 2025, despite the massive scale of child exploitation.Glenn mocks the politicians claiming that "we care so much about our children.”“I don't think you care about our children. I'm beginning to think you're not really human,” he says.But it’s not just politicians who are to blame; part of the problem, he says, is us.“The outrage that we all have on any topic lasts about 72 hours, and then we move on. Have you noticed that one?” Glenn asks.“I don't know what that says about us. Does it say that we're overwhelmed? That there's just a new thing to be outraged on every 72 hours? That we're exhausted? ... Does it say that we're fragmented into so many tribes that we're only pursuing accountability when it hurts the other team?”Glenn fears the answer may be far darker.Perhaps “we've become totally accustomed to scandal,” he says, or worse — “Nothing's real any more. Child rape is not real any more. Even our outrage isn't real any more.”He argues that social media is the only reason we’re even still talking about Epstein. Without X, Facebook, and other platforms artificially prolonging and amplifying the scandal, Glenn fears the public would have long forgotten the convicted sex offender and his countless victims.“There was a time in Great Britain … in the entire West, if there was a whiff of corruption at high levels: national reckoning,” he says.But today, we just “wait it out,” and scandal after scandal just quietly “goes away.”To hear Glenn’s full monologue, watch the video above.Want more from Glenn Beck?To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling, thought-provoking analysis, and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

No DEI in CIA: Ratcliffe Rescinds 19 Politicized 'Intelligence' Reports

Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., said he will not support a move to enact President Donald Trump's tariffs into law following the Supreme Court's decision to overturn them Friday.