By James Altucher, Best-selling author; hedge fund manager; entrepreneur President Trump’s Executive Order 14179 just opened an AI “Wealth Window” for good Americans. Hello. I’m James Altucher. I’ve been called a “genius investor” by my fans… And an “eccentric millionaire” by some others. I think it’s because I make big predictions… That tend to come true. Today, I’m making my boldest prediction ever. Next-generation AI technology will create the first $100 TRILLION industry. And there could be trillions available to those investors who get in early. I put together this personal video [HERE]. In the video, I reveal the AI stocks I believe could turn $10,000… Into $1 MILLION over the next few years. If you get in early, this one-time opportunity could… Potentially change your financial circumstances… For you, your family, and your heirs. Today, I want to show you how I believe… AI 2.0 will open a brief “wealth window”… That will slam shut June 25. If you’ve missed out on crypto or tech wealth before…. I urge you, do not ignore this message. >>HERE is everything you need now P.S. To show you I’m serious about helping you get in on this opportunity, I’m giving away one of my top 5 AI 2.0 stock picks – free. See my top 5 pick here now. (Note: Thank you for supporting businesses like the one presenting a sponsored message in this article and ordering through the included links, which benefits WLTReport. We appreciate your support!  MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!)

Charlie Kirk is absolutely brilliant, especially when facing off with college students in this public debates. Credit to both sides on this one, Charlie is always a class act but I thought the student did well in this one too, and both sides stayed above-board and handled themselves with class. Charlie got the upper-hand by a country mile, but the kid did his best and did so admirably, even going over to shake Charlie’s hand at the end. We need more of this in our country. More debate. More speech. More conversation. More exchange of ideas. I think you’re going to enjoy this, and I’ll put the full transcript down below too. Here you go: “The Violinist” is a gruesome analogy used by the pro choice mafia in an attempt to make the pro life stance look unreasonable, but it shows how unreasonable the abortion argument really is at it’s core. The analogy asserts that murder is okay if you feel inconvenienced. There is… pic.twitter.com/kr2RmDrZZn — Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) June 6, 2025 FULL TRANSCRIPT: Student:I wanted to ask you about something you’ve probably never talked about. Never.Uh, yeah—abortion. Charlie Kirk:Oh yeah.Now if you make an argument I’ve never heard, I will give you great credit. Student:Uh, so uh, yeah. I wanted to basically try to determine whether you—uh, as you’ve, I believe, suggested—believe that abortion in case of rape should be illegal because of the right to life being absolute.Or that it’s—the right to life is supposed to be weighted against autonomy and freedom,but just the burden of carrying a child of a rapist is simply insufficient to justify abortion. And uh, if I may, I would use a thought experiment for that. Charlie Kirk:Is it the violinist? Student:Uh, a modified version of it. Charlie Kirk:Yeah, see, I’ve heard it all, man.So you gotta—it’s Oxford, you gotta go deeper, man. Student:Well, well it—it’s a—I’m gonna be honest, like, I got hundreds of hours on this topic.Give me something I haven’t heard before. Charlie Kirk:Okay, good. Student:Uh, the question is whether you would—If anyone doesn’t know the argument, I’m gonna just spell it out in the modified version. So the Society of Music Lovers has determined that your wife is the only person that can save the life of a famous violinist.They have kidnapped her.And his—and uh, their circulatory systems are currently attached.She can detach from the violinist, it will be safe for her, but it will lead to the violinist’s death. The question is: would you be willing to force her to stay attached to the violinist for 9 months?And then, uh, the next question is: would your answer change if, uh, it was 10, 11, 12 months, her whole life?If perhaps she was supposed to be bedridden for the whole time to increase—to—for—for the sake of, well, seeing what happens if the burden significantly increases. Charlie Kirk:Well the second part of the question is irrelevant,because it’s only for 9 months, so keep it applicable to the topic at hand, correct?Yeah.Otherwise it’s—it’s a completely irrelevant moral question. Secondly, um, just to be clear, um,you’re not bed—you’re not—you’re not kidnapped when you get pregnant,so I don’t quite understand the analogy, right? Uh, number three: yes. I mean, if the—If the—In this—I always found this—this, like, this analogy outrageous.If you’re asking me or my wife,my wife would answer,“If I have to suffer for 9 months so that another being will assuredly get life,I will do that.”That’s how she would answer. Student:Yeah.So the—the question is, uh, whether the right to life is absolute— Charlie Kirk:It is. Student:—or whether some level of inconvenience can be taken into account—or rather burden can be taken into account and weighed against it. In this case, I’m asking, what if it was, for example, for her whole life?Because what if— Charlie Kirk:It’s not a relevant—I haven’t thought deeply about it, honestly.But it’s not relevant, ’cause pregnancy is at a 9-month window.So it’s not relevant to my abortion view. Student:Well, but—Well the burden is also different of being attached to someone—a violinist—The burden is completely different to be—to carrying a rapist’s—uh—uh—child of a rapist. So I do acknowledge that the burdens are different.But I guess—The question is whether there is a—a burden that could be weighed against the—the right to life. And if in this case, uh, you just believe that the burden—Only—the only burden would be life of the mother. So you would force your wife—F—okay, look—You would be willing— Charlie Kirk:Hold on a second.No—I—I would be willing to do whatever is necessary to not have a human being eliminated. And I guess—is it a human being in the womb, yes or no? Student:Yes. Charlie Kirk:Then why don’t you get the human being rights? Student:Well, that’s what I’m trying to just— Charlie Kirk:No—ask—ask the question.Why does that human not get rights and you do? Student:Well, uh—uh—my—my question is— Charlie Kirk:No—answer the question.Why do you get rights and the baby doesn’t? Student:I’m not saying it doesn’t. Charlie Kirk:Yeah.The right to life—eliminate it.That’s the first and most fundamental right of the West.Why don’t you give that right to the baby? Student:Well, I’m not saying I’m not. Charlie Kirk:Yes you are. Student:No I’m not.I’m asking whether you would force your wife— Charlie Kirk:Well, hold on a second.Do you—Very fundamentally, do you believe that every human being has a right to life regardless of how small you are or what level of development that you are on? Student:I do believe that every person does have a right to life, yes. Charlie Kirk:You do not believe that. Student:I do. Charlie Kirk:Okay then we agree.Abortion should be eliminated and outlawed. Student:Yeah.And you would force your mother—You—you’re—sorry—force your wife to stay with a violinist— Charlie Kirk:Again, I’ve—Attached to a violinist for her life—You are gruesomely describing a universal truththat we will protect life no matter how small or level of developmentand the environment or the degree of dependency. And again, I will throw it back to you,’cause it’s very easy to use this analogy to make it seem like I’m unreasonable,but you’re actually the unreasonable one here saying that“I will eliminate the human being just because…”For what reason? There is no excuse for murder. Period.We believe that in the West, correct? Now you want to make the self-defense argument, we can go back there.I’ve heard every argument. That—I’ve heard that the baby is a parasite.I’ve heard the baby’s an invader.I’ve heard the baby that is, you know, currently taking the nutrients. None of them are morally applicable to the actual circumstance of gestation. Period.Every human being has a right to life. You can check your notes again if you’d like,but every human being has a right to life.Yes or no?It’s what built the West. Student:Well it’s—it’s what I’m asking.It—it’s the only thing I wanted to ask.Would you force your wife— Charlie Kirk:Got it.You—you got your answer. Student:No, I understand. Charlie Kirk:What you are doing is a rhetorical trap.I’ve answered it completely, which is this:I stand for the abolition of abortion in all circumstancesagainst life of the mother because life matters. Every human being I believe is made in the image of the divine,is sacred,is unique. And if we get away from this principle, as we have,we not only have moral degradation,we not only have the collapsing society around us,but it’s bad for that being itself. That being itself is unique.That being has rights.And who are we to say just because we’re older that we get to murder it? Thank you. Full screen video player here with captions added if you prefer: Charlie Kirk Brilliantly Exposes “The Violinist” pic.twitter.com/5A48yoNiKF — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) June 6, 2025

Explosive allegations have surfaced that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was involved in arming ISIS operatives in Gaza to orchestrate a false flag attack against Israel, according to leaked intelligence documents cited by anonymous sources. [...] The post Netanyahu Caught Arming ISIS in Gaza for False Flag Attack Against Israel appeared first on The People's Voice.

FBI Director Kash Patel announced that Dr. Anthony Fauci’s seized cell phone and hard drives, recovered by the Trump administration, contain evidence of “crimes against humanity” tied to the COVID-19 pandemic response. Speaking on the [...] The post Kash Patel: “Fauci’s Seized Phones and Drives Prove He Committed Crimes Against Humanity” appeared first on The People's Voice.

In a 2-1 ruling, an Appeals Court found that President Trump can keep the Associated Press out of the Oval Office. The AP could call the Gulf, the Gulf of Mexico and they could get into the Oval Office and on Air Force One again. Who needs them? All they do is use the information […] The post Appeals Court: President Trump Can Keep the AP Out of the Oval Office appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

FBI Director Kash Patel left popular podcast host Joe Rogan in shock when he revealed that he’d been swatted just one day prior to his appearance on Rogan’s show. Patel let the information slip while he and Rogan recorded “The Joe Rogan Experience” episode that dropped on Friday, and the host visibly recoiled at the thought. “The head of the FBI gets swatted?” Rogan asked in apparent disbelief, his eyebrows raised. WATCH: Kash Patel was SWATTED. Swatting is attempted murder. These people need to be arrested. pic.twitter.com/T7zwDFFWav — Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) June 6, 2025 “As Director of the FBI, I have a responsibility — I’m not just going to bring a case because somebody hurt me,” Patel began, adding, “They did. And they continue to do it. S***, my house just got swatted yesterday.” “What?!” Rogan exclaimed. “Yeah,” Patel replied. “You got swatted?” Rogan asked, clearly struggling to wrap his brain around the information. “Oh, yeah,” Patel confirmed. “The head of the FBI gets swatted?” Rogan asked again. Gift Dad an All Access Membership. Use code DAD40 at checkout to save 40%! “Yeah,” Patel repeated. “Yeah. These people play — it’s the ultimate height of hypocrisy. They have two sets of rules. One against you, and one for them.” During the same interview, both Rogan and Patel appeared to be caught off guard by news of the very public spat between President Donald Trump and billionaire entrepreneur Elon Musk — largely over Trump’s support for the One, Big Beautiful Bill currently before the U.S. Senate. Patel quickly made it clear that he did not want any part of that conversation, and Rogan suggested that someone might need to take Musk’s phone away — at least on a temporary basis. “What is he doing? Someone should take his phone away,” Rogan said. “I’m just staying out of the Trump-Elon thing. That’s way outside my lane,” Patel replied. “What the f*** are they doing?” Rogan asked. Patel was insistent: “I know my lane and that ain’t it.” ? JOE ROGAN: “Jesus Christ. What is he doing? Someone should take his phone away.” KASH PATEL: “I’m just trying outside of the Trump/Elon thing. That’s way outside my lane.” JOE: “What the f**k are they doing?” KASH: “I know my lane and that ain’t it.” ? pic.twitter.com/umgAWFtIP5 — Autism Capital ? (@AutismCapital) June 6, 2025

Prosecutors say Luigi Mangione kept diaries chronicling in chilling detail his plans to assassinate UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson and revealing he backed off of a mass-casualty attack he had initially conceived. The self-proclaimed anti-capitalist wrote in his manifesto that he chose to “wack the CEO” rather than bomb the UnitedHealthcare headquarters because he believed it would generate better headlines and be less likely to be deemed “terrorism,” according to court documents revealed this week. “So say you want to rebel against the deadly, greed fueled health insurance cartel. Do you bomb the HQ? No. Bombs=terrorism,” Mangione allegedly wrote in a red spiral notebook found in his backpack upon his arrest five days after the shooting. Manhattan prosecutors are confident that this is “open and shut case,” pointing to evidence continuing to pile up indicating that Mangione’s goal was “to send a message.” In parts of the diaries that had been previously released, Mangione reasoned that someone should “wack the CEO at the annual parasitic bean-counter convention. It’s targeted and precise and doesn’t risk innocents.” The University of Pennsylvania graduate justified targeting insurance providers because they “literally extract human life force for money,” and seemed fixated on how his actions would be perceived by the public, adding that “the point is made in the news headline ‘Insurance CEO killed at annual investors conference.’ It conveys a greedy bastard that had it coming.” Mangione expressed relief that he had not followed through with a mass-casualty event, allegedly writing, “I’m glad — in a way — that I’ve procrastinated [because] it allowed me to learn more about UHC.” “KMD would’ve been an unjustified catastrophe that would be perceived mostly as sick, but more importantly unhelpful,” Magione allegedly wrote of a potential attack in his home state of Maryland. The accused assassin reportedly came to this conclusion by analyzing the public reaction to Ted Kaczynski, known as the Unabomber. “Ted K makes some good points on the future of humanity, but to make his point he indiscriminately mailbombs innocents. Normies categorize him as an insane serial killer, focus on the act/atrocities themselves, and dismiss his ideas,” Mangione wrote, apparently having a desire for his act of violence to be as palatable as possible for “normies” to get behind. The filing adds that authorities found a note, which has been previously reported on, in Mangione’s possession during his arrest at a McDonald’s in Altoona, Pennsylvania, addressed to federal investigators. “To the Feds, I’ll keep this short because I do respect what you do for our country. To save you a lengthy investigation, I state plainly I wasn’t working with anyone,” Mangione wrote, describing his attack as “fairly trivial,” involving “some elementary social engineering, basic [computer aided design], and a lot of patience.” The note continued with an unapologetic justification: “I do apologize for any strife or trauma, but it had to be done. Frankly, these parasites simply had it coming,” then launching into a sanctimonious rant about the state of health care in America. “If ever there were an open and shut case pointing to a defendant’s guilt, this case is that case. Simply put, one would be hard pressed to find a case with such overwhelming evidence of guilt as to the identity of the murderer and the premeditated nature of the assassination,” prosecutors wrote regarding the entries. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg argued that even disregarding the mountains of physical evidence presented in Wednesday’s filing, the prosecution still would have enough to convict Mangione on the terrorism count. “The shooting itself speaks volumes of the defendant’s intent. Defendant chose to shoot the CEO of the United States’ largest health insurance company in front of the hotel where the company was about to conduct its annual investor conference,” Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg wrote in the filing. Mangione, 27, faces both state and federal murder and terrorism charges in connection with the shooting death of Thompson in Midtown Manhattan on December 4, leading to a five-day manhunt that ended with Mangione’s arrest in Pennsylvania. Mangione has pleaded not guilty on all charges. Gift Dad an All Access Membership. Use code DAD40 at checkout to save 40%! According to authorities, Mangione murdered Thompson, a father of two young children, in a “premeditated, cold-blooded assassination” as an act of “political violence.” On the federal level, Attorney General Pam Bondi announced in late May that the DOJ intends to pursue the death penalty in the Mangione case. Mangione’s attorneys have moved to exclude his writings from the court record, arguing their client wasn’t afforded his constitutional rights when arrested. Prosecutors responded, agreeing to pre-trial hearings on the admissibility of the evidence, including the red spiral notebook and statements made to police officers. Mangione is scheduled to appear in court for his state charges on June 26.

President Donald Trump signed several executive orders on Friday, lifting regulations on aviation technology and working to boost American manufacturing of drones. The trio of orders lifts regulations that had made domestic production of drones costly, prioritizes the usage of American-made drones by federal agencies and provides for the creation of a grant program for […]

'I believe that Musk is sincere'