from Your News: Alliance says it will expand aid despite corruption concerns; Trump administration blocks Kyiv from using U.S. long-range missiles. By yourNEWS Media Newsroom The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) intends to provide Ukraine with an additional $50 billion in military assistance by the end of 2025, after already supplying $33 billion since January, […]

President Trump floated the idea of renaming the Department of Defense to the ‘Department of War.’ The move would return the Pentagon to its former name before changing it following World War II. “It used to be called the Department of War and it had a stronger sound,” Trump said. “We won World War I, we won World War II, we won everything,” he continued. “I don’t want to be defense only,” Trump said. “We want offense too,” he added. Check it out: .@POTUS "Pete, you started off by saying the Department of Defense. Somehow it didn’t sound good to me… It used to be called the Department of War…" pic.twitter.com/4FeTsrfYwY — DOD Rapid Response (@DODResponse) August 25, 2025 More from POLITICO: The War Department existed from 1789 until 1947, when the Truman administration split the department into the Army and the Air Force, and joined it with the then-independent Navy. Former President Harry Truman named the new cabinet-level agency the Defense Department. Truman intended the name change to give the Pentagon chief more centralized powers over separate branches of the military, especially the Navy, which had significant independence through the end of World War II. Trump has hinted in recent weeks about the possibility of reverting the name back, calling Hegseth his “Secretary of War” at a NATO summit in June and indicating that political correctness forced the switch. “If you look at the old building next to the White House, you can see where it used to be secretary of war,” he said. “Then we became politically correct and they called it secretary of Defense.” The president suggested the rebranding was imminent. But the Pentagon would likely need any name change approved by Congress since the department was established by a decades-old law. “I’m drafting a bill to restore the Department of War to its original name—the only name that captures the full range of America’s military capabilities,” Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) said. I’m drafting a bill to restore the Department of War to its original name—the only name that captures the full range of America’s military capabilitiespic.twitter.com/n1NjoEwBFZ https://t.co/4DeDDQfp3o — Mike Lee (@BasedMikeLee) August 25, 2025 Trump was asked how he intends to change the department’s name. “We’re just going to do it. I’m sure Congress will go along if we need that,” he said. “Defense is too defensive. We want to be defensive, but we want to be offensive, too if we have to be,” he added. Footage below: Q: "On the Department of War, how do you plan to do that? It requires an act of Congress to rename the Defense Department…" President Trump: "We're just going to do it. I'm sure Congress will go along if we need that…Defense is too defensive. We want to be defensive, but we… pic.twitter.com/tfj3jhGVhY — CSPAN (@cspan) August 25, 2025 Forbes provided additional details: The shift from the Ministry of War to the Ministry of Defense also followed that of the United States, and the reasons were also similar. First, in most nations, the ministry oversaw just the army, while another ministry oversaw the navy. With the introduction of air forces, all of these branches were rolled into a single ministry, or department, in the case of the United States. This is meant to help address any inter-service rivalries. The other and more significant change was to the name. After the horrors of the First and Second World Wars, the focus was put on defense, to emphasize that it was protecting the homeland and its people instead of engaging in offensive warfare. It also promotes civilian control over the military. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, whom Trump has referred to as the “secretary of war” on a least one occasion, conducted an unscientific poll on X earlier this year, asking if Americans preferred “Department of Defense” to “Department of War,” with 54.3% approving of the old name vs. 45.7% opting for the defense moniker. Tech entrepreneur Elon Musk was in favor of the former name, writing, “War is more accurate.”

Blue Öyster Cult were one of the weirdest bands of the early 1970s, but they began even more strangely

Ghana Against Corruption JamesHoare Tue, 08/26/2025 - 08:57

America already learned a lesson from the Green New Deal: If an industry survives only on special favors, it isn’t ready to stand on its own.Yet the same game is playing out again — this time for artificial intelligence. The wealthiest companies in history now demand tax breaks, zoning carve-outs, and energy favors on a scale far greater than green energy firms ever did.Instead of slamming on the accelerator, Washington should be hitting the brakes.If AI is truly the juggernaut its backers claim, it should thrive on its merits. Technology designed to enhance human life shouldn’t need human subsidies to survive — or to enrich its corporate patrons.An unnatural investmentBig Tech boosters insist that we stand on the brink of artificial general intelligence, a force that could outthink and even replace humans. No one denies AI’s influence or its future promise, but does that justify the avalanche of artificial investment now driving half of all U.S. economic growth?The Trump administration continues to hand out favors to Big Tech to fuel a bubble that may never deliver. As the Wall Street Journal’s Greg Ip pointed out earlier this month, the largest companies once dominated because their profits came from low-cost, intangible assets such as software, platforms, and network effects. Users flocked to Facebook, Google, the iPhone, and Windows, and revenue followed — with little up-front infrastructure risk.The AI model looks nothing like that. Instead of software that scales cheaply, Big Tech is sinking hundreds of billions into land, hardware, power, and water. These hyperscale data centers devour resources with little clarity about demand.According to Ip’s data: Between 2016 and 2023, the free cash flow and net earnings of Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft rose in tandem. Since 2023, however, net income is up 73% while free cash flow has dropped 30%.“For all of AI’s obvious economic potential, the financial return remains a question mark,” Ip wrote. “OpenAI and Anthropic, the two leading stand-alone developers of large language models, though growing fast, are losing money.”Andy Lawrence of the Uptime Institute explained the risk: “To suddenly start building data centers so much denser in power use, with chips 10 times more expensive, for unproven demand — all that is an extraordinary challenge and a gamble.”The cracks are already beginning to show. GPT-5 has been a bust for the most part. Meta froze hiring in its AI division, with Mark Zuckerberg admitting that “improvement is slow for now.” Even TechCrunch conceded: Throwing more data and computing power at large language models won’t create a “digital god.”Government on overdriveYet government keeps stepping on the gas, even as the industry stalls. The “Mag 7” companies spent $560 billion on AI-related capital expenditures in the past 18 months, while generating only $35 billion in revenue. IT consultancy Gartner projects $475 billion will be spent on data centers this year alone — a 42% jump from 2024. Those numbers make no sense without government intervention.Consider the favors.Rezoning laws. Data centers require sprawling land footprints. To make that possible, states and counties are bending rules never waived for power plants, roads, or bridges. Northern Virginia alone now hosts or plans more than 85 million square feet of data centers — equal to nearly 1,500 football fields. West Virginia and Mississippi have even passed laws banning local restrictions outright. Trump’s AI action plan ties federal block grants to removing zoning limits. Nothing about that is natural, balanced, fair, or free-market.Tax exemptions. Nearly every state competing for data centers — including Virginia, Tennessee, Texas, Arizona, Georgia, Indiana, Illinois, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Nebraska — offers sweeping tax breaks. Alabama exempts data centers from sales, property, and income taxes for up to 30 years — for as few as 20 jobs. Oregon and Indiana also give property tax exemptions.RELATED: Big Tech colonization is real — zoning laws are the last line of defense Photo by the Washington Post via Getty ImagesRegulatory carve-outs. Trump’s executive order calls for easing rules under the National Environmental Policy Act, Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and other environmental statutes. Conservatives rightly want fewer burdens across the board — but why should Big Tech’s server farms get faster relief than the power plants needed to supply them?Federal land giveaways. The AI action plan also makes federal land available for private data centers, handing prime real estate to trillion-dollar corporations at taxpayer expense. No other industry gets this benefit.Stop the scamFlorida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R) put it bluntly: “It’s one thing to use technology to enhance the human experience, but it’s another to have technology supplant the human experience.” Right now, AI resembles wind and solar in their early years — a speculative bubble kept alive only through taxpayer largesse.If AI is truly the innovation its backers claim, it will thrive without zoning exemptions, tax shelters, and federal handouts. If it cannot survive without special favors, then it isn’t ready. Instead of slamming on the accelerator, Washington should be hitting the brakes.

A 1,400-year-old Christian cross has been found on Sir Bani Yas Island in Abu Dhabi. The cross is about a foot long and seven inches wide and was molded on a plaque of stucco plaster. The cross plaque is intricately designed and in excellent condition, cracked but complete. It is an eight-point cross with four small eight-point crosses inside circles embedded into the four Vs of the ends and in the center where the arms intersect. It stands on a stepped base that represents the hill of Calvary These iconographic elements — the stepped base, the leaves, the pointed ends, the complexity of the abstract tableau — are characteristic of Christian crosses in the Middle and Near East. “Visually, every element of the plaster cross incorporates regional motifs,” Maria Gajewska, an archaeologist who leads the team on the island, told The National. “The stepped pyramid at the bottom, representing the Golgotha; the leaves sprouting from the base; the shape of the cross arms; the dots at the ends and the setting within a niche all find regional parallels in the Gulf and Mesopotamia.” Archaeologists with the Department of Culture and Tourism discovered the plaster cross in the courtyard of an ancient house. It was face down in the soil and a fingerprint on the back of the plaque caught the eye of archaeologist Hager Al Menhali. The team turned the stucco plaque over and were stunned to see an the intricate cross. Today Sir Bani Yas island is wildlife reserve home to oryx, gazelles and cheetahs as well as an open archaeological park, but in Late Antiquity is was home to a thriving early Christian community. A church and monastery dating to the 7th and 8th centuries A.D. were discovered there in the 1990s, identified by another cross plaque, albeit a much smaller and less elaborate one. A group of nine courtyard houses were unearthed nearby, but it was not clear whether they were associated with the monastery. The discovery of this cross confirms that the housing was indeed connected to its monastic neighbor. It is thought senior monks may have lived in solitude in the courtyard buildings and walked across to the church for mass or other services, before returning. Another theory is that the buildings could have functioned as an ancient retreat for wealthy Christians to get away from the world – living and praying by lamplight. Ms Gajewska said blackened earth found on the ground in the buildings could indicate places where residents had lamps. One large stone building examined this season was built using limestone and coral from the island. Ms Gajewska said the buildings were unusual because they are extremely well made, featuring thick walls to tackle the heat and cisterns for water. That is an indication of a more comfortable existence than simple hermit life. “They could have been places where senior monks who prayed at the church lived permanently, or else where people retreated to for periods of seclusion, perhaps during Christian Lent,” she said. The fate of the community is not known. Christian denominations in the region were riven by schisms and philosophical disputes, and their demise was accelerated with the arrival of Islam. Christian and Islamic communities did co-exist in the transitional period, and there is no evidence at the Sir Bani Yas site of a catastrophic event or conflict. The buildings were clean and tidy, not damaged or derelict. There was no rubble or decay indicative of a slow decline. It seems the residents intended to return. Archaeologists plan to return to continue the excavation of the courtyard houses and hope to answer some questions about how the community lived and died. They will also be added to the visitor trail that marks the archaeological sites of the island.

A 2016 astronaut photo shows surprising plumes of milky material swirling in the waters of Turkey's Lake Van, the largest alkaline lake on Earth.