The mother of a WNBA player lost her life in a head-on collision with an illegal alien from Guatemala. ICE had several detainer requests on Rolando Ico-Choc, all of which were ignored . . .

The celebrated children’s host aired segments in 1983 that demonstrated the perils of nuclear war in the Neighborhood of Make-Believe.

The United States and China clashed over the Panama Canal at the United Nations on Monday, with the U.S. warning that Beijing's influence over the key waterway could threaten global trade and security and China calling U.S. accusations a pretext to take over the canal.

The number of people in immigration detention reached a new high of more than 60,000 on Monday, breaking a modern record set during the first Trump administration, according to internal records from Immigration and Customs Enforcement. The number of detained people has jumped since January, when about 39,000 people were in immigration detention, reflecting efforts by the Trump administration to quickly ramp up arrests and deportations. According to ICE records obtained by The New York...

Fifteen federal judges in Maryland, led by Chief Judge George L. Russell III, are asking a court to dismiss what they call an "unprecedented and uniquely disruptive" lawsuit filed by the Trump administration over a rule that briefly pauses deportations. In a reply filed on Monday, the judges argued that the suit was legally baseless and unnecessary. They also said it threatened judicial independence. The administration seeks to block the judges' standing order requiring a two-business-day...

Immigration and Customs Enforcement is planning to purchase AI technology allowing them to scan retinas and identify people to deport. The tech uses an app that allows agents to snap a photo of someone’s eye 10-15 feet away. Then, it will compare that photo to ones already in their system and even on social media. The agency is under pressure from the White House to detain and deport more undocumented migrants. Right now, agents are increasingly detaining people with no lengthy...

In 1964, Paul McCartney of the Beatles famously sang, “I don’t care too much for money, money can’t buy me love.” While Mr. McCartney’s sentiments were definitely a major foreshadowing of the hippie, free-love movement that was to come in the ‘60s, it appears as though he was also onto a big truth that wouldn’t be proven for another 50 years.11 years ago, researchers Hugo M. Mialon and Andrew Francis-Tan from Emory University embarked on the first study to determine whether spending a lot on a wedding or engagement ring meant a marriage would succeed or fail.The pair wanted to see if the wedding industry was being honest when it came to claims that the more money a couple spends, the more likely they are to stay together.“The wedding industry has consistently sought to link wedding spending with long-lasting marriages. This paper is the first to examine this relationship statistically,” the researchers wrote. Maybe don't splurge on the big balloon release. Photo by Álvaro CvG on Unsplash The researchers carried out online surveys with more than 3,000 people who have been married at least once and live in the United States.After reviewing the answers to the questionnaire the researchers learned that spending big bucks on a wedding and engagement ring made a couple more likely to get divorced.So much for the idea that "Diamonds are a girl's best friends." Thanks a lot, Marilyn! The researchers determined that "marriage duration is inversely associated with spending on the engagement ring and wedding ceremony."For example, couples that spent between $2000-4000 on an engagement ring were about 1.3 times more likely to divorce than couples who spent in the $500-2000 range. For wedding ceremonies, $20,000 was the big cut off — any more than that was correlated with a 1.6 times increase in divorce likelihood. Remember that this study was conducted in 2014. In 2025, the average cost of a wedding is a whopping $31,281. Clearly, an updated survey is needed.Conversely, the research found that "relatively low spending on the wedding is positively associated with duration among male and female respondents."Those cheap courthouse weddings that cost almost nothing? Very often, they foreshadow a long-lasting marriage!The researchers also found that the number of people who attend the wedding matters, too. The questionnaire revealed that “high wedding attendance and having a honeymoon (regardless of how much it cost) are generally positively associated with marriage duration."The researchers haven’t studied why people who splurge on weddings and rings have a greater chance of having to hire divorce lawyers, but they have a few theories. A romantic wedding day kiss. Giphy “It could be that the type of couples who have a … (cheap wedding) are the type that are a perfect match for each other,” Mialon told CNN. “Or it could be that having an inexpensive wedding relieves young couples of financial burdens that may strain their marriage,” he added.Francis-Tan believes that people who have weddings with a large number of attendees are more successful because they have a lot of support.“This could be evidence of a community effect, i.e., having more support from friends and family may help the couple to get through the challenges of marriage,” Francis-Tan said. “Or this could be that the type of couples who have a lot of friends and family are also the type that tend not to divorce as much.”(Interestingly, common sense would indicate that a high guest count naturally drives up the cost of the wedding — so it really comes down to how much you're splurging on food and decor.)Could it also be that people who put a big emphasis on a flashy wedding and jewelry tend to bit a bit more materialistic? It makes sense that couples that are really into keeping up appearances may not have their priorities straight when it comes to building a loving relationship. Gwen Stefani throws a bouquet in a music video. Giphy Of course, there are many, many factors that go into a long, happy, and successful marriage. And don't forget that not all marriages that last are happy. Spending big on a fancy engagement ring or splurging for the chocolate fountain at the wedding don't spell doom for couples that communicate and work on their relationship. Like anything in life, there are no guarantees either way.To finish things off with another pop music analogy, “If you liked it then you should have put a ring on it,” (just make sure it’s an inexpensive one, in front of a lot of people, in your backyard).This article originally appeared four years ago. It has been updated.