The official narrative is crumbling. An FBI insider has blown the whistle, confirming what many suspected all along: local law enforcement were ordered to stand down moments before the Charlie Kirk assassination—handing the killers a [...] The post FBI Agent Blows Whistle: ‘Stand Down Order’ Given on Morning Charlie Kirk Was Assassinated appeared first on The People's Voice.

A leftist protester assaulted a senior advisor to Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. at the United Nations.

Bringing Middle East Hell to the USA Dearborn’s radical Islamists have taken over. Anyone who doesn’t cooperate with their rules will be ignored or call an Islamophobe. As Tommy Robinson said, it’s not about ordinances. They are showing their muscle and dominance. Dearborn residents complain about the Islamic call to prayer blaring out at 5am. […] The post Dearborn & 1,000 Al Qaeda Who Poured Through Our Borders appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Sir Menzies “Ming” Campbell, the former Liberal Democrat leader who courageously opposed the Iraq War and championed civil liberties during his distinguished parliamentary career, has died at age 84, prompting widespread tributes hailing him as a “true giant” of British politics. A Leader Shaped by Principle Over Politics Campbell’s political career exemplified the kind of principled leadership that conservatives can respect, even when disagreeing on policy specifics. Born in 1941, he entered Parliament in 1987 as MP for North East Fife after a distinguished athletic career representing Britain as an Olympic sprinter. His transition from sports to politics demonstrated the discipline and competitive spirit that would define his public service. Unlike many politicians who chase popular opinion, Campbell built his reputation on consistent, well-reasoned positions that he defended regardless of political cost. His expertise in foreign affairs became his defining characteristic, particularly his vocal opposition to the Iraq War in 2003. While many politicians on both sides of the Atlantic rushed to support military intervention, Campbell’s skepticism proved prescient. His stance reflected the kind of cautious, America-first approach to foreign entanglements that resonates with constitutional conservatives who believe in defending national interests rather than engaging in nation-building adventures overseas. Leadership During Liberal Democrat Chaos Campbell assumed the Liberal Democrat leadership in 2006 following Charles Kennedy’s resignation amid health concerns and leadership challenges. This transition period highlighted the party’s instability, with Campbell inheriting an organization struggling to define its identity in British politics. His leadership came during a critical time when the party needed steady guidance to maintain credibility and unity. The circumstances surrounding Kennedy’s departure and Campbell’s subsequent challenges illustrate how political parties can devour their own leaders when facing internal pressures. Despite his efforts to stabilize the party and provide principled opposition to both Labour and Conservative policies, Campbell faced relentless media scrutiny focused primarily on his age rather than his substantive policy positions. This treatment exemplified the shallow, appearance-obsessed nature of modern political coverage that prioritizes style over substance. The same media bias that attacked Campbell for being too old would later celebrate elderly politicians when it suited their preferred narratives. Confronting Political Ageism and Media Bias Campbell’s experience with ageism reveals troubling double standards in political coverage that persist today. While media outlets obsessed over his age, they ignored his intellectual vigor, policy expertise, and principled leadership style. His successor Nick Clegg later acknowledged that Campbell faced unfair treatment based on age discrimination, confirming what many observers already knew about media bias. This pattern of selective outrage based on political convenience should concern anyone who values fair and honest journalism. The circumstances of his 2007 resignation demonstrate how media pressure can undermine democratic leadership selection. Rather than allowing voters to judge Campbell’s performance and policy positions, media narratives forced internal party discussions about electability based on superficial characteristics. This dynamic mirrors the way American media often treats conservative politicians, focusing on personal attacks rather than substantive policy debates. Legacy of Integrity in an Era of Political Opportunism Campbell’s death prompts reflection on the values he represented throughout his career: integrity, intellectual honesty, and commitment to constitutional principles. His reputation for cross-party respect stemmed from his willingness to engage in substantive debate rather than partisan grandstanding. Political figures from across the spectrum have acknowledged his contributions, suggesting that principled leadership can earn respect even from ideological opponents. This approach contrasts sharply with today’s political environment, where personal destruction often takes precedence over policy discussion. His legacy offers lessons for contemporary politics about the importance of experience, wisdom, and institutional knowledge in leadership roles. Campbell’s background in foreign affairs, combined with his parliamentary experience, provided the kind of expertise that voters should value over flashy rhetoric and social media presence. The tributes following his death emphasize qualities that transcend party politics: honesty, dedication to public service, and respect for democratic institutions. Sources: Charles Kennedy – Wikipedia Menzies Campbell – Wikipedia

'We have nothing to lose but our chains.'

Tropical storm watches have been issued

President Donald Trump reacted to the new report showing that the FBI deployed more than 250 agents in plainclothes to the Jan. 6, 2021, U.S. Capitol protest. “It was just revealed that the FBI had secretly placed, against all Rules, Regulations, Protocols, and Standards, 274 FBI Agents into the Crowd just prior to, and during, the January 6th Hoax,” Trump wrote Saturday on TruthSocial. “This is different from what Director Christopher Wray stated, over and over again! That’s right, as it now turns out, FBI Agents were at, and in, the January 6th Protest, probably acting as Agitators and Insurrectionists, but certainly not as ‘Law Enforcement Officials.'” The document, reviewed by the House Judiciary Committee, revealed that more than 250 agents were deployed to the Capitol on Jan. 6 without proper safety equipment, clear instructions, or identifiable markings. FBI staff said their deployment felt chaotic and politically compromised, according to feedback included in the report. Several agents said they felt the bureau had become “infected” by partisan ideology. They criticized FBI leaders for treating the Jan. 6 rioters differently than protesters from the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests and riots. “I want to know who each and every one of these so-called ‘Agents’ are, and what they were up to on that now ‘Historic’ Day,” Trump said. “Many Great American Patriots were made to pay a very big price only for the love of their Country.” Trump placed blame on former FBI director Christopher Wray. Trump has said picking Wray to run the FBI was one of his worst personnel decisions in his first term. “Christopher Wray, the then Director of the FBI, has some major explaining to do,” Trump said. “That’s two in a row, Comey and Wray, who got caught LYING, with our Great Country at stake. WE CAN NEVER LET THIS HAPPEN TO AMERICA AGAIN!” The Justice Department Thursday charged former FBI Director James Comey with perjury and obstruction of Congress. The post Trump: FBI Agents Were ‘Agitators,’ ‘Insurrectionists’ at Jan. 6 Riot appeared first on The Daily Signal.