The following article, ‘Get Your Fat A**es Over To Cracker Barrel’: Unhinged Liberal Actress Jennifer Welch Says Trump Voters Should Be Banned From Mexican, Chinese And Indian Restaurants (Video), was first published on Conservative Firing Line. In a stunningly foul-mouthed rant, Bravo actress and podcaster Jennifer Welch is calling for white supporters of President Donald Trump to be banned from Mexican, Chinese and Indian restaurants. On her “I’ve Had It” podcast, Welch in graphic terms slammed white voters who side with the president’s border policies, but then dine at ethnic eateries across America. … Continue reading ‘Get Your Fat A**es Over To Cracker Barrel’: Unhinged Liberal Actress Jennifer Welch Says Trump Voters Should Be Banned From Mexican, Chinese And Indian Restaurants (Video) ...

Not meant for the children. The post The one genre Bob Dylan said kids will never like: “My motto is never follow anything” first appeared on Far Out Magazine.

“D.C. Crime,” editorial cartoon by Tom Stiglich for The American Spectator on August 11, 2025.

Imagine a typical American household: Ma, Pa, a son, and two daughters. Everyone loves the Winslows of Yardley, Pennsylvania. One evening, these five suburbanites return home from the movies. The Winslows walk into their kitchen and discover four illegal aliens feasting on the dinner that the family had planned to heat up and enjoy after the film. Too bad. The illegal aliens beat them to it. They devoured the entire meal and clogged the sink with dirty dishes, pots, and pans. Now, if the Winslows followed the Democrat Party’s model, they would add these illegals to their household, find places for them to sleep, and, henceforth, serve breakfast, lunch, and dinner — not for five people, but for nine. Everyone is welcome! Moreover, the Winslows would report their family size to the authorities as nine individuals and apply for federal grants to feed, clothe, educate, and medicate the four illegal aliens now under their roof. However, if the Winslows pursued the Republican Party’s model, they would tell the illegal aliens to leave, give them 30 seconds to get hopping, and then — if necessary — call the police to arrest them, escort these foreign invaders from their property, and hand them to ICE for deportation from whence they came. President Donald J. Trump’s bold, badly needed, and much-welcome Census-reform effort follows the Republican Party model described above: Illegal aliens have invaded America in enormous numbers. Most recently, southwest border incursions totaled 8,785,843 under Joe Biden’s four-year reign of border destruction, versus 2,987,925 during Trump 45’s presidency. Biden’s yank-the-back-door-from-the-hinges policy shoved this number up 294 percent, compared to Trump’s first term, Customs and Border Protection reports. Because Democrats have used these illegal aliens to swell local, state, and national population figures, Trump announced Thursday morning, via Truth Social: I have instructed our Department of Commerce to immediately begin work on a new and highly accurate CENSUS based on modern day facts and figures and, importantly, using the results and information gained from the Presidential Election of 2024. People who are in our Country illegally WILL NOT BE COUNTED IN THE CENSUS. Thank you for your attention to this matter! A U.S. Commerce Department spokesman told me: “The Census Bureau will immediately adopt modern technology tools for use in the Census to better understand our robust Census data. We will accurately analyze the data to reflect the number of legal residents in the United States.” The Trump administration’s recalculated Census will exclude illegal aliens from the total populations of each state and, thus, the entire country. Those who have broken into America with neither permission nor papers will not and should not be enumerated as part of this nation — any more than the four illegal aliens who busted into the Winslows’ home and gobbled down their dinner should be considered members of that family. (RELATED: Five Quick Things: Correcting A Botched Census? I Voted For That!) Since illegal aliens have no right to be in America, do not belong here, and already are self-deporting and being deported, they absolutely must vanish from this updated Census. This is especially true regarding the counting of heads for legislative apportionment. Since illegal aliens cannot vote for city councilmen, state representatives, U.S. House members, or U.S. senators, it logically follows that they should be excluded from those who legally populate these corresponding legislative districts. Illegal aliens have no place in this society, and ICE must boot every one of them as soon as physically possible. Since they do not belong here and are heading home, they clearly should not be enumerated as legislative constituents. Likewise, illegal aliens should be barred from local and state populations when the federal government distributes funds for public services. Illegal aliens have no right to federal education, highway, or healthcare dollars. They should not be counted among candidates for such assistance, as they are ineligible for such relief. Illegal aliens should not be included in the tally of potential aid beneficiaries. The only people in those totals should be U.S. citizens as well as legal immigrants who rang America’s doorbell and asked to enter, rather than those who penetrated the border and burst into the homeland. The Democrats who misgovern America’s sanctuary cities and fugitive states should not be rewarded for destroying this country’s borders and waving in these 8.8 million illegals under Biden, and perhaps the same or double that number in previous years. Counting illegal aliens for apportionment gives these radical-Left cities and states more legislative seats than they otherwise would have earned. (RELATED: The Sanctuary State Confederacy) This also opens the spigots even wider, for more federal cash, based on population figures fattened with the bodies of illegal aliens. This perverse incentive must vanish, so that these Democrat thugs do not wield greater political power and score more federal cash as bonuses for their border demolition and near-erotic embrace of these illegal-alien hordes. If Democrats want to defend this disgusting racket, let them. They will finally expose themselves as the party that obliterated the southern border and vacuumed illegal aliens into America to boost their numbers for apportionment, federal outlays, and — eventually — millions more ballots from grateful illegals, should they ever achieve amnesty, citizenship, and the vote. While rare, more aggressive illegal aliens appear to have voted in previous elections. Democrats are welcome to applaud all of this in public. Their already plunging public approval will speed even more swiftly to the floor. Also, the Republican Congress should immediately enact a law that excludes illegal aliens from every future Census and permanently restores the question “Is this person a CITIZEN of the United States?” That simple query appeared on each decennial Census, conducted under Democrat and Republican presidents, between 1820 and 2000. In 2010, Obama deleted the citizenship question, thereby signaling Democrats’ lust for the institutional skullduggery that now defines their party. Rather than a racist plot that’s “worse than Hitler,” as Democrats oh-so-predictably will bellow, Republicans on Capitol Hill simply would restore the status quo ante Obama, and include the very same citizenship question posed in the Census forms issued by those famous white nationalists Bill Clinton, Jimmy Carter, John F. Kennedy, and Franklin Roosevelt. Since the days of non-insane Democrats, like Clinton, the Donkey Party started this Census abuse. Republicans, weaker than those in charge today, were too scared of their own shadows to stop it. Alas, Trump 45’s Justice Department overthought and overlawyered its defense of the Census’s citizenship question, when the Left litigated Trump’s efforts to restore it in 2020. A thoroughly confounded U.S. Supreme Court could make neither heads nor tails of the administration’s convoluted, needlessly baffling brief. So, maddeningly, it sided with Trump haters, and Obama’s corrupt ban on the citizenship question continued. Americans should be grateful that President Trump is finally booting illegal aliens from the Census — as well he should — and not a second too soon. READ MORE from Deroy Murdock: Kill the Tillis Tax! Unmaking Whoopi When Good Judges Go Bad Deroy Murdock is a Manhattan-based Fox News Contributor.

Instagram’s recently launched Map feature, which rolled out Wednesday, purports to help friends stay “up-to-date” by allowing you to share your “last active location” in real time. Meta insists that this feature is off by default, requires you to opt in, and is limited to mutual followers or a custom list of users. But the uproar from users — especially those concerned about women, minors, and survivors of abuse — reveals the real issue: it’s another stride toward the normalization of social media as surveillance, not as a tool for human connection. How safe can a privacy promise be when it could flicker on without your say-so? Despite Meta’s assurances, plenty of users claimed the feature was enabled automatically or linked to location data through tagged posts — even when their phone settings were set to “Never.” This gap between corporate messaging and user experience breeds distrust: how safe can a privacy promise be when it could flicker on without your say-so? (RELATED: Digital Peeping Toms: The Perverts Building Your Dating Apps) This isn’t just about friends knowing where you are; it’s about giving Meta access to your every move. When you reveal your location to your friends, you are also giving it to Instagram. After all, location data is gold for advertising algorithms and behavioral profiling. Meta’s privacy track record — from data breaches to mishandling user information — has already eroded faith in its “opt-in” infrastructure. (RELATED: Is This the Stupidest Sentence of 2025?) Some proponents of this feature argue that it is helpful. They believe it functions as a digital equivalent of parents checking in on kids. But if this feature is meant to be used as a safety mechanism, especially one for children under age 18, why make Instagram the house of this cautionary tool? Just months ago, Instagram was touting the idea of getting underage users off the platform altogether or segregating them to “Teen Accounts.” This PR move was contradicted by Instagram’s newfangled attempt to compete with Snapchat’s user location-farming. 3. Share locations with friends and see what’s happening around you on the Instagram map ?️? And if you’re a parent with supervision set up for your teen, you have control over whether they can share their location, and who they’re sharing with. (Available in some countries) pic.twitter.com/cMPpl9j20t — Instagram (@instagram) August 6, 2025 In past generations, parents tracked school attendance or curfews — if even. These boundaries were physical, relational, and arguably more respectful of privacy. They were addressed person-to-person, not finger-to-screen. Today, that dynamic has shifted dramatically. The digital age has turned location into an everyday data point, privacy into a negotiable feature, and connection into constant monitoring. Instagram Map, if used intentionally, will be available to view on profiles as a status alert, updated the same way users post a moody song to their Instagram Stories. But others, less aware of this new feature, or those looking to use it for safety purposes, may be out of luck. It’s one thing to check in with a text or a call; it’s another to be perpetually visible to a corporation whose interests rarely align perfectly with your own well-being. (RELATED: Self-Reliance: The Lost Trail of Silicon Valley) What this new Instagram feature exposes is a deep tension between convenience and control. In our desire to feel connected and safe, we may willingly surrender the very privacy that sustains individual autonomy. This trade-off is rarely transparent, giving symbiotic interaction between geolocating friends when, in reality, Big Tech companies are making out like bandits from this illusion. This normalization of surveillance through social media sets a precedent: that privacy is an outdated luxury and that being “seen” takes precedent over being secure. This normalization is not incidental; it’s deliberate. Tech companies like Meta monetize attention and behavior patterns, and location data offers unparalleled insights into users’ daily rhythms. In a world where every movement can be tracked, mapped, and sold, the concept of privacy becomes fragmented, fractured into permissions hidden deep in settings menus few understand or care to read. Give them an inch? Well, they’ll take a mile — don’t forget the tyranny of Big Tech’s COVID and 2020 election censorship under the guise of “harmful misinformation.” (RELATED: The Global Censorship Cancer) Constant surveillance rewires our expectations of relationships. Friendship and family become layers of data points rather than human exchanges. Trust morphs from mutual respect and honesty to the assurance that one’s location will be known and accounted for. And when privacy violations inevitably happen, as they almost always do, victims are left doubly harmed — first by the breach itself, and second by the erosion of faith in digital platforms meant to connect them. To reclaim control, society must reckon with what it means to be connected in the digital age. It means asking hard questions: Who benefits from this “always on” connectivity? What are the true costs of sharing our whereabouts? How do we protect the vulnerable without branding technology that leaves them vulnerable as “fun” or a “safety tool”? And most importantly, how do we rebuild digital spaces that honor privacy as a fundamental right, not as a negotiable feature buried beneath layers of corporate interest? Instagram’s Map feature may be the latest iteration of a familiar trend, but it’s also a wake-up call. It challenges us, once again, to reconsider the price of convenience, the meaning of safety, and the value of privacy. Seeing our friends’ location on Instagram may be a cool piece of information to know — but we must ask how Meta benefits from this new feature. As users, we must demand transparency, control, and respect — not just empty promises of “opt-in” safeguards. The free market operates on the notion of supply and demand, so we must not become complacent in the corrosion of natural boundaries of human bonds to benefit Big Tech’s bottom line. Because if Instagram becomes the friend who watches you more than listens to you, then privacy isn’t just lost — it’s handed over, willingly, to an unblinking Big Brother that profits from our most intimate movements. READ MORE from Julianna Frieman: No, Epstein Was Not Melania Trump’s Matchmaker Gen Z Isn’t Just Online — They’re Living in Parallel Realities Gavin Newsom Wants To Be Donald Trump So Badly Julianna Frieman is a writer based in North Carolina. She received her bachelor’s degree in political science from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. She is pursuing her master’s degree in Communications (Digital Strategy) at the University of Florida. Her work has been published by the Daily Caller, The American Spectator, and The Federalist. Follow her on X at @juliannafrieman.

On Monday, California Governor Gavin Newsom announced plans to fight fire with fire, directing his outrage at Texas’s redistricting efforts. While gerrymandering has been a fairly bipartisan practice for decades, Newsom declared on X that it risks “the destabilization of our democracy,” and that he will do the exact same thing in response. He stated that if President Trump does not call on Texas Governor Greg Abbott to cease redistricting plans, “I will be forced to lead an effort to redraw the maps in California to offset the rigging of maps in red states.” (RELATED: The Spectacle Ep. 255: Texas Democrats’ Gerrymandering Meltdown) Replies to Newsom’s X post quickly garnered criticism, as one user stated, “California has 52 Congressional seats and the GOP has 9 of them. That’s 17 [percent] for a state that votes nearly 40 [percent] Republican.” (RELATED: The Democrats Are Messing With Texas. It’s Time to Shut Down the Fleebagger Circus.) Although Newsom ironically attacks redistricting as a threat to the country before vowing to engage in it, California does maintain the constitutional right to redraw its districts. Doing so could prove challenging, however, as several blue states have already been gerrymandered to a substantial level.  In late July, the New York Times noted this fact, stating, “States where Democrats would have complete control over any redistricting, such as Illinois and Maryland, are already gerrymandered heavily in their favor. Squeezing more Democratic seats out of those states would be a challenge.” While the irony is stark, Newsom’s outrage over supposed election interference falls flat, as Texas and California have both had four standard decadal redistricting cycles since 1990. Even with rarer mid-decade redistricting taken into account, Texas has only gerrymandered on four additional occasions since 1990. Such actions are allowed as long as no racial discrimination or equal protection violations occur, meaning that timing itself is not prohibited by the Constitution. Although Texas courts can legally order redrawing of congressional maps apart from the mandated cycle, the state’s only major, non-cyclical gerrymandering since 1990 occurred in 2003. Although Left-wing critics accuse red states of redistricting to disenfranchise black voters, blue state map drawing often has the practical effect of racial gerrymandering. This is accomplished through the use of “packing,” a term for gerrymandering black voters into fewer districts, making those districts more heavily democratic.  Although Newsom accused President Trump and Abbott of election “rigging,” his planned retribution could represent interference in a process that is constitutionally granted to state legislatures. The only thing standing in the way of Newsom’s heroic rebuttal is the fact that the Left has been doing the same redistricting for decades. READ MORE from Andrew Gondy: AI Should Not Be Your Therapist Young Conservatives Cannot Afford to Be Neutral on Family

Socialist Representative Ilhan Omar (D-MN) called her father “an educator.” According to the man’s obituary, he was a distinguished colonel in the army of communist Somalia, whom the United Nations described as having “one of the worst human rights records in Africa.” There is no evidence of her father’s direct complicity in any atrocities, but Omar has not confronted the legacy of the regime to which her father was loyal. (RELATED: The Melting Pot Myth Is Destroying America) Somali Dictator Siad Barre sought to fuse Marxist-Leninist governance with Islamism in his two-decade-long rule of Somalia. His Somali Revolutionary Socialist Party used the slogan “social justice” and utilized tensions in the Somali clan system to govern. This effort culminated in the persecution of the large Isaaq clan.  The Isaaq, the majority group in the northern part of the nation that later seceded to become the Republic of Somaliland, were targeted wherever found by state and paramilitary entities. The Isaaq Genocide resulted in the murder of at least 50,000 civilians, primarily between 1987 and 1989, by the communist regime of Somali dictator Siad Barre. Colonel Nur Mohamed Omar served in the regime’s military in the late 1970s and is known to have remained in the government until it collapsed. The Somaliland Chronicle released a report last week covering the depth of the Barre regime’s atrocities, noting that the uncertain nature of Omar’s role opens questions as to where his involvement had been. The Chronicle described the violence as patterned after other “Red Terror” campaigns by communist regimes. This included the destruction of Somaliland’s two largest cities, Hargeisa and Burao, where a Somali officer gave a now-infamous order to “kill all but the crows.”  These campaigns culminated in the bombardment of practically every civilian home in the region, from city to village. Survivors who sought to flee were directly targeted by the regime’s planes or less formal paramilitary units nicknamed “Isaaq Exterminators.”  There is no evidence that Colonel Omar was directly involved in any of these atrocities. However, he demonstrated enough loyalty to the regime perpetrating these atrocities to maintain a successful career in the Somali government. Ilhan Omar mentions in her 2020 memoir This Is What America Looks Like that her family lived a “very privileged life” in a compound surrounded by armed guards. They only fled in 1991 when the last enclaves of the Barre regime came tumbling down in Mogadishu.  Despite having worked for the communist regime, the Omars were welcomed into the United States as “refugees.” Her father’s work for a regime with a bloodstained record has been evoked in several reports. Omar has not once commented on the subject, even in her memoir covering her Somali childhood.  During a 2022 visit to Somalia, the sitting Congresswoman was identified at an event alongside General Mohammed Said Hersi Morgan. Morgan directly oversaw much of the Isaaq slaughter and is on record calling for “a campaign of obliteration” against “anti-Somali germs” who would “inherit only ashes.”  Omar’s questionable record on human rights abuses is not unique to Somalia. In 2019, she voted “present” on a resolution to recognize the genocide of Armenian Christians by the Ottoman Empire.  Ilhan Omar’s roots in a regime that fused Marxism and Islamism have consistently come out in her political life. She describes herself as a “patriotic” Somali and has led the way in preventing the diplomatic recognition of Somaliland, where her father committed his crimes. While conservative analysts of the Horn of Africa consider how American policy can help America, Ilhan Omar describes Somaliland as “our [Somali] lands.”  Americans elect our representatives for this nation and no other. Congresswoman Omar has repeatedly steered United States foreign policy towards the Somali interests her father worked for, not the American ones she was elected to serve. READ MORE by Shiv Parihar: Superman Captures the Fall of 20th Century Liberalism Marxists Have No Claim to Archbishop Oscar Romero Anti-Communists Mark Eight Years Since Chinese Human Rights Attorney Gao Zhisheng Forcefully Disappeared  

by Alexander Marlow, Breitbart: Over the past year, I have investigated all of the six major cases against Donald Trump that played out simultaneously between his two administrations for my book Breaking the Law. Each one of them involves obvious improprieties that necessitate investigations. In many instances, I believe investigators will find criminal activity, which ought […]

from Sputnik News: WASHINGTON, (Sputnik) – US President Donald Trump wants the United States to halt the financing of the conflict in Ukraine, with US citizens tired of spending their taxes on it, US Vice President JD Vance said on Sunday. “The president and I certainly think that America, we are done funding the Ukraine […]

from The Jimmy Dore Show: TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/