YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #virginia #astronomy #police #humor #nightsky #moon #crime #treason #animalbiology #supermoon #perigee #commies #zenith #loonyleft #lawenforcement
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
6 w

Favicon 
spectator.org

Iowa Does Not Need ‘Revolutionary’ Election Changes That Violate Voters’ Associational Rights

Iowa should not abandon its primary system for a complicated, multiple-choice voting process that would blur party lines and weaken voters’ right to freely associate through the political party of their choice. The Iowa legislature has, in recent years, passed a series of measures to strengthen election integrity that put the Hawkeye State in the top tier when it comes to election security, according to the Heritage Foundation’s Election Integrity Scorecard. This includes passing an election reform measure prohibiting ranked choice or instant runoff voting, a confusing and chaotic process created by liberal academics that effectively disenfranchises voters and is intended to allow marginal candidates to be elected even though they are not supported by a majority of voters. (RELATED: Voters Wisely Dropped Ranked-Choice Voting) Now, however, Iowa’s party primary and caucus system is being unfairly criticized by liberals for supposedly not being “democratic,” when it is the very essence of democracy. In a closed primary and caucus system, as Iowa has, registered voters must be declared members of a specific political party to participate in that party’s decision-making. Crossover voting is prohibited; that is, a Democrat cannot vote in a Republican primary or caucus and vice versa. Republican voters should not have the power to nominate Democrat Party candidates, and Democrats should not have the ability to choose the nominees of the Republican or Libertarian Parties. This system protects voters and their right to associate with the political parties they support. Otherwise, crossover voters can interfere with and take away the political choices the voters of a specific party want to make when selecting the candidates whose views and positions they support. Republican voters should not have the power to nominate Democrat Party candidates, and Democrats should not have the ability to choose the nominees of the Republican or Libertarian Parties. Iowa’s current system prevents that and protects the rights of voters and their political parties to choose the candidates they believe best represent them. Critics of Iowa’s primary and caucus system claim that independents are left out of the process, but this claim does not hold water. Iowa law not only permits voters to switch their party preference, but they can even do so on Election Day. The same situation applies to the presidential caucuses, which are actually party-run affairs. Iowa’s caucuses may be “closed,” but voters can easily change their party affiliation and participate in a caucus. Afterwards, voters can switch back and declare themselves to be independent if they so choose. The process is not burdensome and does not create any roadblocks to participation. Neither is it a violation of an independent voter’s constitutional rights, as the 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals held in March in Polelle v. Florida, a case that challenged Florida’s closed primary system. (RELATED: SCOTUS Just Missed a Big Opportunity to Stop Election Meddling) Arguments are being made that Iowa’s current primary system should be replaced by “a single public primary” where all voters, regardless of political party, can vote, otherwise known as a jungle primary. The top two candidates — even if they represent the same political party — would face each other in the general election. This would be similar to an open primary where voters can engage in crossover balloting. This type of system fundamentally violates the associational rights of political parties and their members and is really intended to harm political parties, reducing their influence and ability to support their candidates. However, this supposed reform does not stop with an open primary. Advocates are also calling for Iowa to adopt “approval voting.” Approval voting is just another variation of ranked choice voting. Voters vote for multiple candidates or give all their votes to one candidate, and whoever receives the most votes is declared the winner. Ranked choice and approval voting are so confusing that even election officials have a hard time understanding and administering such elections. The process creates unnecessary complexity, disenfranchises voters due to a recognized phenomenon called “ballot exhaustion,” and leads to lengthy ballot counts and recounts. Apparently, supporters of these measures want to make it harder to vote, not easier. Liberals have for many decades tried to replace the Constitution’s principles of limited government, checks and balances, and federalism with majoritarian democracy and an expanded, centralized government with overwhelming control over our lives. The same situation applies at the state and local level with the calls for “democratic” reforms that are anything but democratic. Since 2018, under the leadership of Governor Reynolds, Iowa has been advancing sound, conservative fiscal and social policies. A majority of Iowans support this commonsense agenda by electing conservatives to office. Liberals and progressives may be upset with these policies, but they ought to remember that it was not too long ago that Iowa was a “purple” state. Iowa’s system of elections is not broken, and neither is the political party system. They just don’t like the fact that lately they have been losing elections because voters don’t like the radical policies they are advancing. Iowa’s primary and caucus system works just fine and does not need to be changed. Iowans should be very concerned whenever “revolutionary” changes are proposed that are really intended to manipulate the system to alter outcomes to benefit one particular political party. “Approval voting” and “single primaries” are those kinds of scheming changes. READ MORE from John Hendrickson: Honoring Patrick J. Buchanan Iowa Needs to Constitutionalize Taxpayer Protections John Hendrickson is the policy director for the Iowans for Tax Relief Foundation. Hans von Spakovsky is a senior legal fellow at the Heritage Foundation and host of the “Case in Point” podcast.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
6 w

Favicon 
spectator.org

Gavin Newsom Claims Working-Class Background, Teases Presidential Run

Gavin Newsom just can’t help himself. He can’t quit claiming that he grew up underprivileged and in virtual poverty. This is despite the fact that he grew up as the surrogate son of billionaire Gordon Getty. All throughout his 20s, thanks to his bond with Getty, Newsom played the part of a playboy socialite from the upper crust of San Franciscan society. As a young man, Newsom also reaped the full benefits of Getty’s energetic intervention in launching his political career. Newsom again trotted out his tale of woe and financial struggle during his childhood — something his political advisers have reportedly told him not to do. Yet on Saturday, Newsom again trotted out his tale of woe and financial struggle during his childhood — something his political advisers have reportedly told him not to do. (RELATED: Gavin Newsom Plots Memoir to Recast Personal Scandals) In an appearance on the All the Smoke podcast, Newsom spoke of how his mother struggled while working several jobs to financially support him and his sister. Newsom has long pointed to his mother’s several jobs to portray himself as coming from a working-class background, even as his father, William Newsom III, worked as an attorney for the Getty family before becoming a state appellate judge. In his work for the Getty family, William Getty managed the Gordon P. Getty Family trust, which had a total value of $2 billion at the time. (Newsom’s parents divorced when he was young.) “My mom was 19, pregnant, and divorced a few years later, with two kids,” Newsom said on the All the Smoke podcast Saturday. “Came from no money and just hustled. You know, worked hard, grinding every single day. Two and a half jobs, no bulls**t.” Newsom continued, “It was also about paying the bills, man. It was just like hustling, and so I was out there, kind of raising myself, turning on the TV, just getting obsessed. I was sitting there with the Wonder Bread.” Following conservative laughter at Newsom’s comments, a spokesman for the governor told Fox News, “Anyone with more than an inch of curiosity would know that Governor Newsom was raised by his mother after her divorce from his father when he was a toddler. He has talked about moving between two different worlds, but he was raised by a mother who worked three jobs at one point — secretary, waitress, and paralegal.” In my book, Newsom Unleashed: The Progressive Lust for Unbridled Power, I chronicled just how much Newsom’s life was shaped by his privilege, even as his father was apparently disinclined to provide adequate child support to the young mother of his two children. Newsom’s time with his mother, I wrote in my book, was “just one side of Newsom’s childhood.” But, with William, it was quite different. I wrote: When William had parenting time, Gavin would frequent the opulent Getty estate, blending in with Gordon’s sons as if they were his brothers and forging a relationship with Gordon as if he were Gavin’s true father. When the Getty family took extravagant vacations, Gavin and William joined them. Whether it was an excursion to the Hudson Bay, the Grand Canyon, or Africa, Gavin was invited, paid for, and embraced as an integral part of the Getty family. Newsom was, [San Francisco journalist Peter] Byrne told me, “the equivalent of Gordon Getty’s son.” Getty, now 91, has never ceased to hold Newsom out to be his own son. And so he did everything he could, in both business and politics, to help Newsom. I wrote: Gordon continued to regard Gavin as his son even after Gavin reached adulthood. The two spent many evenings drinking together at the Balboa Cafe, according to a San Francisco resident I spoke with who owns a home on the city’s famed Lombard Street. In 1992, when Newsom was twenty-four years old, he launched his first business with Andrew and Billy Getty, Gordon’s biological sons. The business was both financially and strategically underwritten by Gordon Getty, using money from the recently unlocked Getty fortune. Getty later openly admitted that his investment was driven by his paternal affection for Newsom. Newsom named the business PlumpJack Wines & Spirits after an opera Gordon had written. It was through Gordon Getty and William Newsom’s longstanding relationship with Willie Brown that Newsom was able to enter politics. Because of this relationship, the 27-year-old Newsom held a fundraiser for Brown at PlumpJack Cafe. Soon after his inauguration as mayor, Brown appointed Newsom to the city’s Parking and Traffic Commission. “This appointment,” I wrote in my book, “served as both a thank you for the successful fundraiser and as a friendly gesture to William Newsom and Gordon Getty. It aligned with Brown’s established practice of giving positions to his friends and benefactors. During his tenure as speaker of the California Assembly, for instance, Brown had appointed Kamala Harris, his former girlfriend, to two state commissions.” The PlumpJack businesses, for which Gordon Getty was so responsible, were also a key part of preparing Newsom’s political career and pumping up his social image. I wrote: During this period, the PlumpJack businesses were rapidly gaining renown as the favored gathering places for San Francisco’s high society. In 1996, Billy and Gavin assumed ownership of the Balboa Cafe. Stanlee Gatti, a San Francisco event designer, explained the establishment’s appeal to the New York Times in 1997. “There’s an association with the Gettys — with Billy Getty and Gavin Newsom,” Gatti said. “People do go because it’s kind of cool to go to their joint.” Beyond contributing to his wealth, the businesses advantaged Newsom politically by ensuring that he was recognized throughout the city as the proprietor of the exclusive restaurants. Newsom quickly continued his climb of the political ladder due to his connections with the political elite, in spite of his youth and lack of experience: In 1997, a vacancy emerged on the San Francisco Board of Supervisors, providing Brown with the opportunity to make an appointment. When deliberating over whom to appoint, Brown consulted with his friend John Burton, with whom he had served on the California Assembly for nearly a decade. Burton shared a close friendship with William Newsom, and this connection spurred Burton to advocate vigorously for the appointment of the glaringly unqualified twenty-eight-year-old Gavin. As the Los Angeles Times put it, Newsom’s “only governmental experience was a six-month sting listening to citizens grumble about bus zones and meter maids.” Brown’s choice, however, satisfied three of the city’s most powerful men — Gordon Getty, William Newsom, and John Burton — and resonated with the city’s upper class, making it a politically advantageous move. As the Los Angeles Times noted, Newsom’s “telegenic face and slicked back hair [were] fixtures of the society pages.” Gavin Newsom, a restauranteur in his twenties, had secured a seat on the city council of one of the most populous and affluent cities in the United States—and not a single vote had been cast. Newsom entered political office entirely indebted to Willie Brown, and, as I explain in my book, it showed. “He’s an appendage of Willie Brown,” said state Senator Quentin Kipp of Newsom’s tenure as supervisor. Not only that, but Newsom’s lack of qualifications was also evident. Soon after his appointment to the Board of Supervisors, Newsom apologized to citizens for not having more concrete ideas on policy and said, “I’ve been learning about politics.” In Newsom’s campaign to be elected mayor of San Francisco, he secured the full backing of Willie Brown. Though he faced critiques for his potential violations of the Political Reform Act, owing to his acceptance of gifts from Gordon Getty during his time in office, as well as for the revelations of extensive payments from Getty for “investment advice” and substantial investments from Getty in his restaurant businesses, Newsom ultimately triumphed, as he had the entire establishment machine behind him. We see, therefore, that Newsom is far from a self-made man who rose up from a poor household. He was, rather, given absurd advantages by the billionaire who treats him as his own son. Consider, for instance, Getty’s response when his advantageous loans to Newsom became a point of contention in the mayoral campaign. Getty said, “I have made loans to Gavin, as I would to my own sons.” ***** On Sunday, Newsom made an appearance on CBS Sunday Morning to announce that he will consider running for the presidency after the 2026 midterms. Of course, Newsom has been seeking the presidency since the 1990s, but this soft announcement helps him prepare more openly for his planned 2028 campaign. (RELATED: Gavin Newsom’s Presidential Campaign Unofficially Begins) CBS’s Robert Costa, evidently knowing that Newsom was sitting down to make this statement, asked the governor, “Is it fair to say, after the 2026 midterms, you’re going to give [running for president] serious thought?” Newsom responded, “Yeah, I’d be lying otherwise. I’d just be lying, and I can’t do that.” “I have no idea,” Newsom further said on whether he will run. “The idea that a guy who got 960 on his SAT, that still struggles to read scripts, that was always in the back of the classroom, the idea that you would even throw that out is, in and of itself, extraordinary. Who the hell knows? I’m looking forward to who presents themselves in 2028 and who meets that moment. And that’s the question for the American people.” Newsom has evidently learned from his disastrous effort to lay the groundwork to challenge Joe Biden for the presidency in 2024, even while being too scared to publicly admit it. After making denial after denial in response to the dozens of inquiries over whether he would challenge Biden, Newsom jumped into the defensive posture of claiming that he was lockstep with Joe Biden, even to the point that Newsom adamantly supported the cognitively addled Biden’s campaign until nearly its dying breath. (RELATED: Gavin Newsom Breaks With Biden to Set Up Presidential Run) This time around, Newsom is not lying about his ambitions, and he is leaving no question about his planned 2028 campaign. Newsom may be better served by adopting that same honesty when it comes to the advantages of his youth rather than claiming to have grown up poor. The extent to which he was helped by Gordon Getty and William Newsom, after all, cannot be hidden. A paid-for $400,000 wedding reception (in today’s money) at the Getty family mansion, to give just one other example, does not in fact give off the air of poverty which Newsom so desperately wishes to project. Ellie Gardey Holmes is the author of Newsom Unleashed: The Progressive Lust for Unbridled Power. READ MORE from Ellie Gardey Holmes: Activists in Michigan Move to Integrate Abortions Into Urgent Care Clinics Praise God for Glenn Youngkin Whitmer Says America Is Ready for a Female President
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
6 w

Halloween Costume
Favicon 
spectator.org

Halloween Costume

“Halloween Costume,” editorial cartoon by Yogi Love for The American Spectator on Oct. 27, 2025.
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
6 w

Lindsey Graham Issues Venezuela’s Maduro Ominous Warning, Tells Him to Leave “Before Heat Goes Down” (VIDEO)
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Lindsey Graham Issues Venezuela’s Maduro Ominous Warning, Tells Him to Leave “Before Heat Goes Down” (VIDEO)

by Cristina Laila, The Gateway Pundit: Here we go. Senator Lindsey Graham on Sunday issued an ominous warning to Venezuela’s Maduro. Lindsey Graham appeared on CBS’s “Face the Nation” and told host Margaret Brennan that he doesn’t believe Maduro will stay around much longer. Margaret Brennan asked Lindsey Graham about the US potentially expanding military […]
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
6 w

Congratulations to Milei for Winning Free Market Mandate in Argentina
Favicon 
www.sgtreport.com

Congratulations to Milei for Winning Free Market Mandate in Argentina

by Mish Shedlock, Mish Talk: The polls and analysts were wildly wrong on this one. Milei’s Party Wins Argentina Midterm Vote in Major Comeback Bloomberg reports Milei’s Party Wins Argentina Midterm Vote in Major Comeback President Javier Milei’s party won Argentina’s midterm vote Sunday, a result that will give the libertarian leader a stronger foothold in Congress […]
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
6 w

"It's a piece of cake!" This is what happens when cities enable addiction instead of solving it.
Favicon 
www.youtube.com

"It's a piece of cake!" This is what happens when cities enable addiction instead of solving it.

"It's a piece of cake!" This is what happens when cities enable addiction instead of solving it.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
6 w ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
Democrats vs. Republicans: The Health Care Showdown
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
6 w ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
The Fusion of Marxism and Islamism: The War on Americanism
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
6 w

REPORT: Amazon Plans To Axe 30,000 White Collar Jobs
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

REPORT: Amazon Plans To Axe 30,000 White Collar Jobs

Amazon is planning to cut upwards of 30,000 corporate jobs beginning this week, Reuters reports. The company is working to “pare expenses and compensate for overhiring during the peak demand of the pandemic,” the outlet stated. BREAKING: Amazon to cut 30,000 corporate jobs beginning tomorrow — Reuters — Insider Paper (@TheInsiderPaper) October 27, 2025 Reuters shared more: The figure represents a small percentage of Amazon’s 1.55 million total employees, but nearly 10% of the company’s roughly 350,000 corporate employees. This would represent the largest job cut at Amazon since around 27,000 jobs were eliminated starting in late 2022. An Amazon spokesperson declined to comment. Amazon has been trimming smaller numbers of jobs over the past two years across multiple divisions, including devices, communications, podcasting and others. The cuts beginning this week may impact a variety of divisions within Amazon, including human resources, known as People Experience and Technology, devices and services and operations, among others, the people said. News of the potential layoffs follows reports that the e-commerce giant allegedly has automation plans that will enable it to utilize robots to fill more than 600,000 jobs that would otherwise go to Americans. Amazon Allegedly Has Plans To Fill 600,000+ Future Jobs With Robots, Company Responds TechCrunch noted: In recent years, Amazon has made smaller job cuts across different divisions. In January, Amazon reduced a small number of positions in its Communications and Sustainability departments. This also follows a CNBC report discussing a memo from Amazon CEO Andy Jassy, which stated that, as Amazon continues to implement more AI agents, fewer corporate jobs will be needed.
Like
Comment
Share
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
100 Percent Fed Up Feed
6 w

WATCH: Florida Gov. DeSantis Announces STATEWIDE TPUSA Partnership, New ‘Charlie Kirk Prize’ Scholarship
Favicon 
100percentfedup.com

WATCH: Florida Gov. DeSantis Announces STATEWIDE TPUSA Partnership, New ‘Charlie Kirk Prize’ Scholarship

Although he may have left us, the mission that Charlie Kirk started is far from over. In Florida, Gov. Ron DeSantis is taking huge steps to empower students to seek truth and advocate for true American values, just like Charlie did in his lifetime. Today, DeSantis announced that Florida is partnering with Kirk’s organization, Turning Point USA, in order to enable every public high school to establish its own chapter for students. Check it out: BREAKING: In an incredible development, Governor Ron DeSantis just announced a partnership with TPUSA to enable EVERY high school STATEWIDE to start a Club America Chapter WOW! “There will be NO impediments to that, and CERTAINLY no discrimination. We’re not gonna allow… pic.twitter.com/WA47KDUxPS — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) October 27, 2025 BREAKING: In an incredible development, Governor Ron DeSantis just announced a partnership with TPUSA to enable EVERY high school STATEWIDE to start a Club America Chapter WOW! “There will be NO impediments to that, and CERTAINLY no discrimination. We’re not gonna allow that.” “Any school or district that does try to discriminate – that man will send you first a nasty-gram, and then drop the hammer!” “Advocate for American values: freedom, free enterprise and limited government. Charlie started out as one of the lone voices on university campuses talking about those back in the day.” I love my state! @GovRonDeSantis TPUSA spokesman and producer of ‘The Charlie Kirk Show’ Andrew Kolvet responded to DeSantis’ announcement: A huge thank you to the great state of Florida and Governor DeSantis for working in partnership with TPUSA to get a Club America chapter in EVERY high school in the state. Massive. Truly incredible. https://t.co/KLT7hxwOAJ — Andrew Kolvet (@AndrewKolvet) October 27, 2025 In addition, DeSantis is launching the new ‘Charlie Kirk Prize’ to award high school speech and debate winners with hefty scholarships. Watch: BREAKING: Florida Governor Ron DeSantis reveals he’s naming the official state “SPEECH AND DEBATE” prize the “CHARLIE KIRK PRIZE,” and the winner will receive a $50K scholarship! “We are going to be naming the prize for the winner of the speech and debate in honor of… pic.twitter.com/oTJuDaOHU2 — Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) October 27, 2025 BREAKING: Florida Governor Ron DeSantis reveals he’s naming the official state “SPEECH AND DEBATE” prize the “CHARLIE KIRK PRIZE,” and the winner will receive a $50K scholarship! “We are going to be naming the prize for the winner of the speech and debate in honor of Charlie Kirk. So people will be able to win a Kirk Prize for winning Speech and Debate.” “Charlie was beating the bushes in Florida for a long time before he became really well-known!” “We are PROUD to be able to do this in memory. But it’s not just a prize…it’s not just gonna be a trophy…we’re going to be able to award the winner of the Kirk Prize a $50K scholarship!” I LOVE THIS! It’s so nice to see a governor advocating for open debate and helping students pursue critical thinking — which is such a rare, but very important, skill to have in these times. This is an amazing tribute but more importantly it is an investment in raising up a new generation of young people who value honest debate and civil discourse. — Simon Unleashed (@SimonSaysKnow) October 27, 2025 Not only will the winner of the new ‘Charlie Kirk Prize’ be awarded $50,000, but runner-ups will also get a nice sum of scholarship change. Fox 13 News has more details: On Monday, DeSantis announced that the prize for winning the Speech and Debate Championship will be named in honor of Charlie Kirk. The winner will also get a $50,000 scholarship. The runner-up will receive a $25,000 scholarship, the semi-finalist will receive a $15,000 scholarship and the four quarter-finalists will receive a $10,000 scholarship. DeSantis said the winners can use those scholarships at any school in the country. Both the winner and the runner-up will receive invitations to attend the National Ronald Reagan Debate in California. “Maybe you will get out of your comfort zone and question your own assumptions and maybe see things a little bit differently. There’s a lot of value in critical thinking,” said Governor DeSantis. The governor also announced a partnership with Turning Point to ensure that anybody in high school that wants to start a Club America chapter will be able to do so. Absolutely amazing. More states should follow suit! If you want to see DeSantis’ full 53-minute announcement, you can watch right here: Governor DeSantis Makes Florida Civics and Debate Initiative Announcement https://t.co/IHNVKRTRr9 — Ron DeSantis (@GovRonDeSantis) October 27, 2025
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 5291 out of 101699
  • 5287
  • 5288
  • 5289
  • 5290
  • 5291
  • 5292
  • 5293
  • 5294
  • 5295
  • 5296
  • 5297
  • 5298
  • 5299
  • 5300
  • 5301
  • 5302
  • 5303
  • 5304
  • 5305
  • 5306
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund