YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #virginia #astronomy #police #humor #nightsky #moon #crime #animalbiology #supermoon #perigee #zenith #lawenforcement #supermoon2025 #raccoon #intoxication
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
6 w

House Democrat Leader Jeffries Relents, Endorses Mamdani for NYC Mayor
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

House Democrat Leader Jeffries Relents, Endorses Mamdani for NYC Mayor

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries on Friday endorsed Democrat nominee Zohran Mamdani to be New York City’s next mayor, in so doing becoming the most senior-ranking national Democrat figure to support the self-described socialist’s bid for Gracie Mansion. “Zohran Mamdani has relentlessly focused on addressing the affordability crisis and explicitly committed to being a mayor for all New Yorkers, including those who do not support his candidacy,” Jeffries said in a statement provided to The New York Times announcing his endorsement. “In that spirit, I support him and the entire citywide Democratic ticket in the general election.” Nevertheless, Jeffries is not without reservations about him, telling The New York Times that the two have “areas of principled disagreement.” Despite these reservations, Jeffries is endorsing Mamdani because the Queens Assemblyman won “a free and fair election” in the Democrat primary and Democrats need to stand united against the “existential” threat of President Donald Trump. The endorsement comes at a pivotal time in the race as Mamdani’s opposition is organizing behind former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s bid and early voting will begin in a matter of days. Jeffries, D-N.Y., who represents part of Brooklyn, had refused to weigh in on the mayoral race for months. As late as Friday morning, Jeffries shirked the opportunity to endorse a candidate. “I have not refused to endorse,” he told reporters. “I have refused to articulate my position, and I will, momentarily, at some point, in advance of early voting.” New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani (Angela Weiss/AFP via Getty Images) Mamdani won the Democratic mayoral primary on June 24, and early voting begins on Saturday ahead of the Nov. 4 election. Question on New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani: "Why are you refusing to endorse?"@RepJeffries: "I have not refused to endorse. I have refused to articulate my position and I will momentarily at some point in advance of early voting." pic.twitter.com/OrQWb5rzfh— CSPAN (@cspan) October 24, 2025 Early on, Mamdani picked up support from fellow democratic socialists Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., and Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt. Mamdani has also received endorsements from other prominent Democrats, among them New York Gov. Kathy Hochul, Sen. Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, and former Vice President Kamala Harris. However, the lack of an endorsement from Jeffries or from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., suggests many national Democrat leaders have been hesitant to support him. Van Hollen has accused New York Democrats of “spineless politics” for not backing Mamdani. Mamdani has passed on opportunities to condemn the phrase “globalize the intifada,” has defended Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil, and has called for city-run grocery stores and a freeze on rents as ways to address the city’s affordability crisis.  ? @ZohranKMamdani: ?‘If You Want a Candidate for Mayor Who Tells You Everything That He Cannot Do, Then Andrew Cuomo Should Be Your Choice’https://t.co/X6mooWOHmv pic.twitter.com/s7GlQ7kyvU— The Daily Signal (@DailySignal) October 22, 2025 He has also released a policy proposal to budget $65 million for “gender-affirming care” for “both transgender youth and adults.” Jeffries is endorsing Mamdani at a time when he is also attempting to deliver a message on the ongoing government shutdown. Mamdani will face off against Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa and former Democrat New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who is running as an independent. The incumbent mayor, Eric Adams, was elected as a Democrat in 2021, but chose to run as an independent in 2025 before ultimately dropping out. Adams has endorsed Cuomo, while President Donald Trump has told The Daily Signal that Mamdani “should be able to win,” given his lead in the polls. The president has, however, indicated his preference for Cuomo over Mamdani, telling The Daily Signal, “I would rather have a Democrat than a communist.” A RealClearPolitics aggregation of October polls shows Mamdani leading Cuomo 47% to 29.8%, with Sliwa at a distant third place with 16% support. Sliwa has vowed not to drop out of the race. "I would rather have a Democrat than a communist."I asked @POTUS if he will ask Curtis Sliwa (R) to drop out of the NYC mayoral race to help Andrew Cuomo catch up with Mamdani. ?"If he dropped out, maybe Cuomo would've a little bit of a chance, but not much because it looks… pic.twitter.com/mhFf2Eu1q8— Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell (@TheElizMitchell) October 21, 2025 Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell contributed to this report. The post House Democrat Leader Jeffries Relents, Endorses Mamdani for NYC Mayor appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Nostalgia Machine
Nostalgia Machine
6 w

Mall Restaurants We Miss!
Favicon 
www.youtube.com

Mall Restaurants We Miss!

Mall Restaurants We Miss!
Like
Comment
Share
Reclaim The Net Feed
Reclaim The Net Feed
6 w

The Cameras Were the Goal Not the Solution
Favicon 
reclaimthenet.org

The Cameras Were the Goal Not the Solution

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. If you live in Greater London, chances are you’re being watched right now. Not by MI5. Not by your nosy neighbor. No, it’s far more mundane than that. You’re being monitored by Mayor Sadiq Khan’s army of always-watching number plate cameras, installed under the noble banner of cleaning the air. And here’s the twist: the air hasn’t changed. But the surveillance? That’s permanent. When the Ultra Low Emission Zone was expanded in 2023 to cover the entire city, 579 square miles of roads, driveways, and backstreets, the stated goal was to reduce pollution.  What it actually achieved was the creation of one of the most comprehensive, always-on vehicle tracking systems in the country. Possibly the continent. Thousands of cameras now scan and record every single vehicle, every single day, across every borough. And according to new research from the University of Birmingham, all of this has achieved virtually nothing significant in terms of environmental impact. The emissions stayed. The cameras stayed. And the idea that this was ever about clean air is beginning to look like a fig leaf for something else entirely. ULEZ cameras were sold to the public as environmental guardians. But what they actually do is log your number plate, check it against a central database, and charge you if your vehicle doesn’t meet emissions standards.  It doesn’t matter if your car is powered by sunshine and tofu. You’re still being recorded, timestamped, location-mapped, and uploaded into Transport for London’s data system. And the longer it runs, the harder it becomes to believe this is just about exhaust fumes. Let’s be blunt: if this were a police surveillance network, the civil liberties brigade would be chaining themselves to lampposts. But because it’s got a green sticker on it, few blinked. It’s surveillance by stealth, a policing movement dressed up as progressive policy. And the worst part? The public is paying for it. The expansion cost Londoners £155 million ($206M). Not for scrubbing the air. Not for planting trees. For cameras. Lots of them. The kind of city-wide, high-resolution, automatic number plate recognition system that intelligence agencies dream about. Within a week of going live, it was generating £5.3 million in revenue. And unlike actual policing or healthcare, this system runs itself.  London’s government insists it’s working. They point to drivers upgrading vehicles before the expansion. Which is a bit like saying the fire alarm is a success because someone already put the fire out before it rang. Even the study’s co-author, Dr Suzanne Bartington, admitted the current ULEZ setup fails to tackle the core public health risks like PM2.5 pollution, the stuff that actually gets into your lungs and bloodstream. “The current ULEZ approach does not fully address significant traffic-related public health issues,” she said. So if it doesn’t result in cleaner air, what does it do? It tracks people. Relentlessly. Quietly. In real time. Let’s not kid ourselves. A surveillance grid this large, this well-funded, and this politically untouchable isn’t going to stay limited to emissions fines forever. Privacy groups have already warned that the ULEZ system could be repurposed for just about anything.  From catching speeding drivers to enforcing low-traffic neighborhoods. From congestion pricing to vehicle bans. Or, if the mood strikes City Hall, tracking “suspicious patterns of movement.” After all, the tech’s already in place. It would be a shame not to use it. And let’s not forget: this all happened without a real public debate. There was no referendum. No opt-out. No serious oversight. Just a green slogan and a lot of money. “This is just further evidence that the ULEZ expansion was about raising money rather than improving air quality,” said Thomas Turrell, of the City Hall Conservatives. “Yet again, Sadiq Khan is ignoring the evidence when it doesn’t suit his agenda.” Even Bromley Council leader Colin Smith weighed in with a dose of brutal clarity: “Had it been about air quality, Mayor Khan would have started where the air in London is dirtiest – in his own tube network. But no, there were no motorists to fleece there.” So here we are. The air is still dirty. The cameras are still on. And millions of journeys are now quietly logged by a system that was never designed to turn off. We were told this was about health and climate. It’s really about control. A system that tracks your car is a system that tracks you. And once it’s normal to be watched everywhere you go, it’s very hard to roll that back. ULEZ may have been introduced as an environmental policy. But its real legacy will be this: the normalisation of mass surveillance, hidden behind a green curtain. Because in the end, the emissions weren’t the target. The people were. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post The Cameras Were the Goal Not the Solution appeared first on Reclaim The Net.
Like
Comment
Share
Reclaim The Net Feed
Reclaim The Net Feed
6 w

EU Accuses Meta and TikTok of Breaking Europe’s Online Censorship Law
Favicon 
reclaimthenet.org

EU Accuses Meta and TikTok of Breaking Europe’s Online Censorship Law

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. European regulators have turned their attention once again to the control of online speech. The European Commission has announced preliminary findings that accuse Meta and TikTok of violating the EU’s Digital Services Act (DSA). According to the Commission, both companies have made it harder for users to report what the EU calls “illegal content,” restricted users’ ability to appeal moderation decisions, and obstructed researchers’ access to data. Read the press release here. The Commission presents these accusations as steps toward improving transparency and user safety, but the measures reach much further into Europe’s tightening censorship structure. At the core of the Commission’s case is the claim that Facebook and Instagram do not offer clear or accessible ways for users to report allegedly illegal material. The EU argues that Meta’s interfaces rely on “dark patterns,” or confusing design choices that may discourage users from submitting reports. The justification centers on removing child sexual abuse and terrorist content, but the DSA’s scope is far broader. It allows users and “trusted flaggers” to report any material that breaks national laws. In countries such as Germany, those laws criminalize large categories of online speech under “hate speech” legislation, which has led to arrests over ordinary commentary or political expression. The Commission also accuses Meta and TikTok of making it unnecessarily difficult for independent researchers to obtain data, describing the companies’ procedures as “burdensome.” Officials claim this data access is necessary for “public scrutiny” of social media’s impact on society and mental health. Yet many of the researchers granted such access use their findings to argue for tighter moderation and greater government oversight of online platforms, effectively pushing for more censorship under the banner of transparency. If the findings are confirmed, both companies could face fines of up to six percent of their global annual revenue. As EU Executive Vice-President Henna Virkkunen declared, “Our democracies depend on trust. That means platforms must empower users, respect their rights, and open their systems to scrutiny. The DSA makes this a duty, not a choice.” Behind this language of empowerment and transparency lies a broader political project. By compelling platforms to enforce speech restrictions rooted in national laws, the DSA allows governments to determine which voices are heard online. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post EU Accuses Meta and TikTok of Breaking Europe’s Online Censorship Law appeared first on Reclaim The Net.
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
6 w

Leftists Promise Devastation With Mass Economic Blackout
Favicon 
hotair.com

Leftists Promise Devastation With Mass Economic Blackout

Leftists Promise Devastation With Mass Economic Blackout
Like
Comment
Share
Science Explorer
Science Explorer
6 w

What Do The Numbers On Your Toaster Really Mean?
Favicon 
www.iflscience.com

What Do The Numbers On Your Toaster Really Mean?

It's not what you think it isn't.
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
6 w

NBC's Law & Order Attacks Trump Team on Lawfare: 'Patriotism is Not Obedience'
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

NBC's Law & Order Attacks Trump Team on Lawfare: 'Patriotism is Not Obedience'

Last night, NBC's Law & Order attacked the Trump administration for fighting back against Big Law. The episode, "Bend the Knee," begins in a boardroom with a lawyer named Roger Wallace (Trent Stone) begging fellow attorneys to take financial loss. "So, I suggest we all consider it a pro bono opportunity for our souls," he says. The scene then switches to a dinner speech being given by District Attorney Nicholas Baxter (Tony Goldwyn) Baxter: Now, I'd like to close with something to think about. America's civic institutions, our schools and universities that shape our kids into citizens, our hospitals that take us in no matter how broken or broke we might be. And, yes, our courts, which safeguard our rights and resolve our disputes peacefully. These institutions are the bedrock of our national conscience. And today, they face a cynical and coordinated attack. Back in the boardroom, Wallace is still pleading with his colleagues. Wallace: Patriotism is not obedience. Patriotism is courage. Lamm: For God sakes, Wallace. Qassimi: What you call courage is going to be the end of this firm. We've been here for 140 years, Roger. Lamm: We'll lose, what, 30%, 35% of our gross revenue? Bradley: Ok, everybody, take a breath. We're in a jam here. We're all looking for the right solution. Hear him out. Wallace: Some things are more important than source credit and billable hours. And everyone in this room believes that because way back when, every single one of us woke up one day and decided that the American system of jurisprudence was pretty neat. Baxter: I know I speak for every single person in this room when I say that it is an amazing thing to be a part of. And it is an institution worth defending to the bitter end. Wallace: What I'm saying is we must hold the line. Wallace is later found dead. His partner, Kevin Bradley (Joshua Malina), is interrogated by police. Bradley reveals that members of the firm were fighting over a deal that sounds just like one President Trump made with major law firms in real life. Bradley: It is not untrue that it has been a very tense two weeks. Our firm does work, takes on clients that you might consider right and left and everything in between. The engine is profit, not ideology.  Det. Scott: Ok. Bradley: Don't know if you've noticed, but the political environment in this country has gotten a little heated lately. Det. Scott: Little bit. Bradley: Two weeks ago, we got word certain people in Washington were not happy with some of the clients we chose to represent. The administration threatened to ban us from doing business with the federal government, a huge chunk of our revenue. Lt. Brady: Unless? Bradley: Unless we coughed up $80 million worth of pro bono work that was friendly to the administration. Lt. Brady: A bribe? Bradley: One man's bribe is another man's donation. It was like an ax came down, split our firm in two. Some partners like me wanted to make the deal. Some, like Wallace, wanted to hold the line. I liked him and I respected him. He had a lot of guts. Wasn't afraid of the repercussions. But the truth is if Roger had his way, it would cost the firm about $200 million per year in lost revenue. In truth, many of the country's biggest law firms are one-sided ideologically and do pro bono work primarily for the left. A 2024 study published in the Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy found that the overwhelming majority of pro-bono amicus briefs filed by Big Law to the Supreme Court were for the liberal side. The interrogation scene and entire episode also ignore the years of lawfare against President Trump and targeted professional destruction by both the Biden Administration and blue states against Trump-allied attorneys. As John Eastman, a Trump attorney targeted by the state of California, told The Daily Caller, “In my view, the only way to defeat the lawfare and weaponization of the last four years is to apply it on a reciprocal [basis] so that the perpetrators of that lawfare feel the heat now that the [shoe] is on the other foot." In the leftist bubble, harmful Democratic actions are never supposed to have consequences. Republicans are only villains and Democrats victims. On network television, the weaponization of the legal system by Democrats against political opponents for the last four years never happened.  In the episode, the murderer turns out to be lawyer who is the son of a diplomat from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). A Justice Department official, Jack Drell, asks DA Baxter to not prosecute the murderer because it could threaten an arms deal with the UAE. Drell is an old friend of Baxter's, but he has become corrupt. He attempts witness tampering to derail the case. Baxter's office tries to ignore the administration's pressure, but reduces the murderer's charge to manslaughter, putting him away for 12 years.  Afterwards, Drell meets with Baxter and gives him a dire warning about "the gravity of the environment we're in now." Drell: We've known each other a long time now, Nick. Baxter: MM. Yes, we have. Drell: We did some good things together for this crazy world. Baxter: I'd like to think so. Drell: But on this one... I failed you. Baxter: You failed yourself, Jack. Look, man. I know you were trying to be a good soldier, but I don't know what you were thinking. How did you think this was going to end? Drell: No. No, that's not what I meant. I failed to help you understand the gravity of the environment we're in now. When I came to you, asked you to drop this case, that wasn't some friendly request from an old pal. Baxter: I see. Drell: This is how things work now. People get in line. People need to bend the knee, or else there are repercussions. And I think it's something for you to really think about, like, ponder, you know? Where your allegiances really are at the end of the day, whether it's really worth being your own guy in this day and age. [Tense music] The episode ends with Baxter revealing that key donors have pulled out of his re-election campaign and the U.S. Park Service has revoked his permit for a fundraiser that night. "Bend the Knee" is an overwrought portrayal of a sinister presidential administration. Law & Order did not make such episodes while Biden was president.  Millions of Americans continue to be fed this constant television diet of fear-mongering about Trump and his supporters. Network television thrives on pushing such toxic drivel.
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
6 w

MSNBC Claims Letitia James Is Fighting For 'Something a Lot Bigger'
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

MSNBC Claims Letitia James Is Fighting For 'Something a Lot Bigger'

As New York Attorney General Letitia James pled not guilty on Friday to mortgage fraud allegations, MSNBC legal analyst Charles Coleman Jr. highlighted the network’s glaring double standards on the situation James finds herself in compared to what she put President Trump through. Jansing led Coleman with the idea that if taken to its logical conclusion, it would result in no public official ever being held legally accountable for anything, “So, in the meantime, what is the real-world impact of this, Charles, on Tish James? I know you said she absolutely doesn't have any fear. I worked in Albany, New York, for 20 years. I spent some time in the AG's offices over the years, and they seem pretty busy to me. They had a pretty full workload. There's money involved. There's time, there's emotion involved. Can you just address that? And the whole idea of upending people's lives?”     As MSNBC shifted from “nobody’s above the law” to “just think about the defendant’s personal life,” Coleman added, “Well, I think that speaks to what Peter was talking about and the fact that it's very obvious that Donald Trump is aware that the process of litigation and the process of prosecution in many respects can be the punishment. And that extends to the DOJ and Halligan's responsibility to sort of follow those marching orders, as it were, that we have seen very publicly displayed by Donald Trump. I want to be clear about, as it relates to his political enemies, Letitia James being one of them.” Showing off his own blindness, Coleman continued, “But I understand and believe that Letitia James knows that she has a job to do, that she was duly elected to do on behalf of the citizens of New York, that she will continue to do so despite having this matter sort of hanging over her head and having to deal with it.” James was elected because she ran on the platform of going after a specific person: Donald Trump. However, now that James’s standards have boomeranged against her, Coleman claimed this case is about so much more than whether or not James committed mortgage fraud: What I will say is that I think if you look at her remarks, Chris, if you look at the way that she's carried herself since the announcement of this indictment, in the two public statements that she's made, she's demonstrated an understanding that this case represents for her and for so many other people, something a lot bigger than what we're talking about on paper. Coleman then repeated himself as he addressed Jansing’s original question, such as it was: And I think that because of that responsibility and understanding that there is a sense that she's standing up to something that's a lot larger than just where she sits, that's actually fueling her and propelling her with a different level of energy and a different level of purpose in this moment. So, I do think that it's something that could actually backfire in terms of something that could be a burden, could ultimately be a boost. A jury of James’s peers will now decide if she is guilty or not. If that standard was good enough for the media when it came to Trump, then it should be good enough for them when it comes to James. Here is a transcript for the October 24 show: MSNBC Chris Jansing Reports 10/24/2025 12:14 PM ET CHRIS JANSING: So, in the meantime, what is the real-world impact of this, Charles, on Tish James? I know you said she absolutely doesn't have any fear. I worked in Albany, New York, for 20 years. I spent some time in the AG's offices over the years, and they seem pretty busy to me. They had a pretty full workload. There's money involved. There's time, there's emotion involved. Can you just address that? And the whole idea of upending people's lives? CHARLES COLEMAN JR.: Well, I think that speaks to what Peter was talking about and the fact that it's very obvious that Donald Trump is aware that the process of litigation and the process of prosecution in many respects can be the punishment. And that extends to the DOJ and Halligan's responsibility to sort of follow those marching orders, as it were, that we have seen very publicly displayed by Donald Trump. I want to be clear about, as it relates to his political enemies, Letitia James being one of them. The practical impact of that is Letitia James knows that she has a job to do as the attorney general of the state of New York, and I assume and believe that she will continue to do it to the best of her ability. Of course, as all of us, we will have distractions that take us away from what it is that we have to do. But I understand and believe that Letitia James knows that she has a job to do, that she was duly elected to do on behalf of the citizens of New York, that she will continue to do so despite having this matter sort of hanging over her head and having to deal with it. What I will say is that I think if you look at her remarks, Chris, if you look at the way that she's carried herself since the announcement of this indictment, in the two public statements that she's made, she's demonstrated an understanding that this case represents for her and for so many other people, something a lot bigger than what we're talking about on paper. And I think that because of that responsibility and understanding that there is a sense that she's standing up to something that's a lot larger than just where she sits, that's actually fueling her and propelling her with a different level of energy and a different level of purpose in this moment. So, I do think that it's something that could actually backfire in terms of something that could be a burden, could ultimately be a boost.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
6 w

The castration of Christendom
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

The castration of Christendom

In Ireland, the priest was once as vital to a village as the pub or the post office. He baptized the babies, buried the dead, and kept the farmers from killing each other. If the neighbors were at war over a hedge, he’d settle it before Mass and still have time for a fry-up. The priest wasn’t just a man of God but also a referee of rural life — part Joe Rogan in a cassock, part St. Patrick with a whistle. The church bell was the town clock. The confessional was the psychiatrist’s couch. And the parish hall was the beating heart of the community.You can now 'attend' Mass online, complete with comment sections and buffering hymns. It’s efficient, yes — but as spiritually satisfying as watching someone else eat your dinner.That Ireland is disappearing. This year, the entire country produced just 13 new priests — barely enough to fill a choir, let alone a nation. The waves of eager new recruits who poured forth from the seminaries are no more, leaving weary veterans to cover half a dozen parishes, driving from one church to the next like overworked delivery drivers of the divine.What happened? "This is an immense question, requiring a book-length answer," Irish journalist John Waters tells Align, after which he kindly attempts a summary anyway:The explanations include: Ireland’s history of kindergarten Catholicism; the damage done by simplistic moralization; the liberal revolution; the infiltration of the Catholic clergy; the escalating implausibility of transcendent ideas (a contrived not a naturalistic phenomenon); the moral inversion unleashed by the LGBT revolution; the confusion created by the church leadership for the past 12 years and counting; et cetera.Irish goodbyeThe outlook is bleak. The number of priests in the capital is expected to fall by 70% over the next two decades. Since 2020, only two priests have been ordained in Dublin’s archdiocese.Across Ireland, the average priest is now over 70, long past retirement age. Some say the Church’s only hope is to let priests marry. It would make more sense than flying in bewildered clerics from Africa, men who can quote Scripture but not survive small talk in a Kerry kitchen.It’s not that people stopped believing in God (though Ireland’s Catholic population has fallen to just 69%, down from nearly 78% less than 10 years ago). They just stopped believing the Church was worth the effort.The pews that once held families now hold the few who remember when everyone came. Ireland changed faster than the Church could follow. Confession replaced by podcasts, pop psychology, and Pornhub. It’s a lethal mix of heresy and habit — busy souls, distracted minds, and a generation convinced that salvation can be streamed, scheduled, or outsourced.Flickering faithAt the same time, people like my mother still light candles. They still bless themselves on long drives. They still mutter prayers when the doctor calls with bad news. Faith is still there; it has just learned to keep its head down. Weddings and funerals still draw a crowd, if only because even the most lapsed Irishman can’t stomach the thought of being buried by a stranger in a suit. The flame is still there, but it’s more a pilot light than a blaze.The fading of show-up-every-Sunday faith has mirrored the fading of everything that once made Ireland feel Irish. The language is vanishing, the music sanitized, the dances replaced by drill rap and dead-eyed TikTok routines.Even the local watering hole — the unofficial annex of every parish — struggles to stay open. What’s vanishing isn’t just religion; it’s ritual, the sense that life meant something beyond the week’s wages.Mass exodusTechnology promised connection but delivered solitude. You can now “attend” Mass online, complete with comment sections and buffering hymns. It’s efficient, yes — but as spiritually satisfying as watching someone else eat your dinner.Once, the whole community walked to church together, children skipping ahead, neighbors chatting along the road. After Mass came tea, gossip, and maybe even a few sneaky pints. These days, the only communion most share is over brunch — order taken by a Filipino, processed by a Nigerian, cooked by a Ukrainian, and blessed by a middle manager named Ahmed.In rural towns, churches stand like sentinels — beautiful, empty, and slightly ashamed of their own magnificence. Some have become cafés or concert halls, serving flat whites where once they served faithful whites. It’s called progress, though it feels more like repurposed reverence.RELATED: Church of England investigating vicar for calling a transvestite deacon a 'bloke' Photo by DANIEL LEAL/AFP via Getty ImagesLet us sprayThe same could be said across the pond. In Canterbury Cathedral — the cradle of English Christianity — artist Alex Vellis recently staged “HEAR US,” a graffiti-style art project inviting visitors to ask, with spray-can sincerity, “What would you ask God?” The answers, splattered across medieval stone, came from “marginalized communities” — Punjabi, black and brown Britons, the neurodivergent, and the LGBTQIA+ faithful. A veritable clown car of the aggrieved, somehow granted front-row parking in the house of God. It was meant as inclusion; it landed as intrusion — like stringing jockstraps across the Vatican altar.When critics like Elon Musk and U.S. Vice President JD Vance rightly accused the project of desecrating beauty in the name of diversity, Vellis fired back not with argument but with anatomy, accusing his detractors of “small d**k energy.”Virile virtueThe phrase, unserious on the surface, hinted at something deeper: Both sides — the artist and the church that hosted him — seem afflicted by the same crisis of conviction. The Church, once roaring with moral certainty, now offers apologies to everyone and inspiration to no one. Its critics, meanwhile, confuse provocation for courage. Between them lies a vacuum where virtue used to be.And this isn’t just an English problem. Across the Christian world, churches of every stripe — Catholic, Protestant, evangelical — have lost their fortitude. Too timid to offend, too eager to trend, they’ve traded conviction for comfort. "Small d**k energy" has gone liturgical.Even in Ireland, where the Church once thundered with certainty, cowardice now calls the homily. The pulpit peddles activism instead of absolution, politics instead of prayer. No wonder so many stay home. And no wonder young men won’t answer the call. Who wants a life devoid of sex, love, and laughter?If Catholicism is to last, it needs less talk and more testosterone. The next revival won’t come from a press release but from those who still believe life means something. If the Church in Ireland and beyond wants people back in its pews — and its pulpits — it best man up.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
6 w

US Army says it is not replacing 'human decision-making' with AI after general admits to using chatbot
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

US Army says it is not replacing 'human decision-making' with AI after general admits to using chatbot

Certain decisions are best not left to machines, the Army has revealed.A United States Army general made headlines last week when he told reporters at a media roundtable he had been using an AI chatbot to "build models to help all of us."'He is helping the Army explore how artificial intelligence can strengthen decision-making.'Major General William "Hank" Taylor told media at the annual Association of the United States Army conference that "Chat and I" have become "really close lately," prompting more questions than answers about the Army's use of AI.Williams is the top United States Army commander in South Korea and makes decisions for thousands of troops. He explained to reporters that he is indeed using the technology to make decisions that affect those under his command, but to what end was unknown.Now, the Eighth Army office has revealed to Return what exactly the high-ranking officer meant. The office said that Taylor's remarks were actually regarding the Army's "ongoing modernization efforts," which specifically relate to how technology can assist leaders in making timely and informed decisions.At the same time, the spokesperson said that the Army does not plan on replacing human decision-makers, especially in key areas.RELATED: From West Point to Woke Point: The long march through the ranks Photo by KIM Jae-Hwan/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images "All operational and personnel decisions remain the sole responsibility of commanders and their staff, guided by Army policy, regulation, and professional judgment," media relations chief Jungwon Choi told Return.He added that while Eighth Army recognizes the opportunities and risks associated with AI, it is only looking at how to integrate "trusted, secure, and compliant systems that enhance — not replace — human decision-making."The Army reiterated that point, stating that Taylor does not use any AI-assisted tools to make personnel, operational, or command decisions, and his remarks were only referring to using "AI-assisted tools in a learning and exploratory capacity."The Army is not looking at "delegating command authority to an algorithm or chatbot," either, Choi reinforced.The Department of War is tinkering with AI chatbots for its forces on the ground, however. As Return previously reported, training scenarios have already included experimentation with an offline battle-ready chatbot.The technology, called EdgeRunner AI, allows soldiers to get instant information about mission objectives, coordinates, and other details instantaneously in an offline environment.EdgeRunner recently wrapped up military exercises in Fort Carson, Colorado, and Fort Riley, Kansas.RELATED: Democrats once undermined the Army. Now they undermine the nation. Photo by JUNG YEON-JE/AFP via Getty ImagesAt the same time, Choi said that like many leaders, Major General Taylor has "experimented with publicly available AI-assisted tools to understand how generative AI functions, its potential uses, and the safeguards required for responsible employment."Taylor has also explored HQDA-approved large language models to "assess how secure, compliant AI systems" can support leadership development or improve operational efficiency, for example. The spokesman said Taylor does not endorse any specific commercial platform, and the Army did not answer as to whether he was referring to using ChatGPT when speaking to reporters, which tech outlet Futurism claimed last week."MG Taylor's engagement with HQDA-approved AI platforms reflects a forward-thinking approach to leadership and modernization," the army representative concluded. "By responsibly experimenting with these emerging tools, he is helping the Army explore how artificial intelligence can strengthen decision-making, improve efficiency, and prepare leaders for the evolving demands of the modern battlefield."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 5489 out of 101517
  • 5485
  • 5486
  • 5487
  • 5488
  • 5489
  • 5490
  • 5491
  • 5492
  • 5493
  • 5494
  • 5495
  • 5496
  • 5497
  • 5498
  • 5499
  • 5500
  • 5501
  • 5502
  • 5503
  • 5504
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund