'didn't Democrats kind of set that up'

“In the absence of sufficient contemporaneous documentation indicating that cognitively deteriorating President Biden himself made a given executive decision, such decisions do not carry the force of law and should be considered void.” That was what a major report released Tuesday by the House Oversight Committee concluded about former President Joe Biden’s autopen usage during his presidency. The report on Biden’s mental acuity while in office and his autopen use was spearheaded by committee Chairman Rep. James Comer, R-Tenn. The committee’s report notes that the Biden administration “left no record demonstrating President Biden himself made all of the executive decisions that were attributed to him.” It seems Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and House Republicans agree with the committee’s conclusions. Speaker Johnson: EVERY Executive Action Signed by the Autopen Without Written Authorization from Biden Should Be Voided"James Comer released a blockbuster report now on the Biden autopen presidency… revealing that every executive action signed by the autopen without written… https://t.co/wyArn72Gz5 pic.twitter.com/0l2S29xjck— Mr Producer (@RichSementa) October 28, 2025 The conclusions about Biden’s executive decisions being “void” means there will soon be a very serious legal challenge to the orders Biden gave, but didn’t verify, while in office. Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on X that her office has “already initiated a review” of Biden’s autopen usage and thanked Comer for his detailed report. My team has already initiated a review of the Biden administration’s reported use of autopen for pardons.@RepJamesComer’s new information is extremely helpful, and his leadership on this issue is invaluable. We’ll continue working with @GOPoversight to deliver accountability…— Attorney General Pamela Bondi (@AGPamBondi) October 28, 2025 To a certain extent the Oversight Committee has simply confirmed what most Americans already knew. That is, Biden was clearly in severe mental and physical decline from the time he was elected and struggled to handle the basic duties of office. One didn’t need to be a doctor or have insider information to know that. It was obvious nearly every time he made a public appearance. What the report has done is shine a light on some of the inner workings of the Biden White House. The report paints a damning picture—one could even call it a conspiracy—of how Biden’s aides, both formal and informal, manipulated their position to secure executive orders, pardons, and clemencies that the president may have had no knowledge of. In one example of how decisions were made in the White House the report highlighted the process that led to a series of pardons as Biden was leaving office. Among these pardons were Biden family members, including his son, Hunter. Biden had said earlier in his presidency that he wouldn’t pardon his son. The Oversight Committee report says that no official documentation exists regarding how the pardon judgments were made. Instead, the decision to grant these pardons was handed down by “second hand” to the second in command under Biden’s chief of staff Jeff Zients, Rosa Po. After receiving the list, Po called Zients “who verbally authorized the use of the autopen from home.” The report said that Zients “did not even know who actually used the autopen to apply the signature after his aide, using his email account with his permission, communicated that the autopen was authorized for the clemency actions.” Zients allegedly went ahead with the autopen pardons without confirming anything with the president. It couldn’t be clearer now that Biden was simply the figurehead of a deep state presidency. His handlers generally made sure to keep him out of the spotlight as much as possible while the executive apparatus went on autopilot. Court intrigue rather than individual decision making by the man elected by the American people was how business was done. Biden ate ice cream, doled out gifts to family members, and occasionally came out of cold storage to wave to crowds and assure the people he was alive. Funny given the tenor of the current so-called “No Kings” protests aimed at President Donald Trump. Biden’s final days certainly seemed a lot more like late-stage monarchy to me. The Oversight Committee report brings up another potential long-term issue. While it’s unlikely that the United States will soon again experiment with putting a man in steep mental decline in the president’s office, it’s not impossible that a situation of a missing in action president might arise again in the future. Given the immense power the executive branch wields, it would perhaps be wise to regularize the process by which executive actions are verified. As John Harrison, a constitutional professor at the University of Virginia School of Law, said at a Senate hearing about Biden’s autopen usage, Congress has the power to oversee whether the president’s orders are actually being given by the man who was elected to office. Perhaps it’s time Congress regularizes that. Better yet, it may be wise to simply disallow autopen usage in the future. The autopen business remains a big deal because it’s tied to one of the most significant scandals in American presidential history: the coverup and denial of the Biden’s mental decline while in office. Because of this coverup the American people can’t be certain that official acts by the president were his acts at all, so we’ve been thrown into an unprecedented legal situation of deciding what he did that was valid and what was potentially “void.” It’s easy to see why the Democratic Party and their media enablers who helped cover up Biden’s decline remain so deeply unpopular with the American people. The post House Report Concludes That Some Biden Autopen Executive Decisions Should Be ‘Void’ appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Virginia Republican gubernatorial candidate Lt. Gov. Winsome Earle-Sears attacked her Democrat opponent, Abigail Spanberger, for prioritizing the climate policies of environmental groups that contributed to her campaign, rather than an all-of-the-above energy plan. “Abigail Spanberger has sold out Virginians to the highest bidder,” Peyton Vogel, Earle-Sears’ press secretary, told The Daily Signal in a statement Tuesday. “She’s taken millions from green special interests who want to force Virginia back into [the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative] and drive up energy costs for working families.” “Winsome Earle-Sears can’t be bought,” Vogel added. “She stands for Virginia families, for an all-of-the-above affordable energy approach, and for doing what’s right rather than what’s politically convenient.” Spanberger is running on lowering costs for Virginians, promising last month that she “will be laser-focused on bringing costs down for families.” Yet she advocates policies that would arguably increase prices, such as returning to the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative and achieving the goals of the Virginia Clean Economy Act, a 2020 law that requires Virginia’s utility companies—Dominion Energy and Appalachian Power Company—to shift to renewable energy by 2045 (for Dominion) and 2050 (for Appalachian). The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, an inter-state agreement, charges power plants for emissions and uses the money to prop up renewable energy. Gov. Glenn Youngkin, a Republican, attempted to exit the initiative, calling it a “hidden tax” on electricity. Virginia’s withdrawal remains in limbo after judge blocked it. The administration has a stay, allowing Spanberger has pledged to rejoin it. Constricting Choices “All these policies will do is constrict our energy choices while having no meaningful impact on the climate,” Kevin Dayaratna, director of Heritage’s Center for Data Analysis, told The Daily Signal. He said the Center for Data Analysis “looked at these policies at the federal level during the Biden administration using the government’s own models and found the result would be over $7 trillion in lost GDP over a 20-year time horizon, with less than two-tenths of one degree Celsius impact by the end of the century.” “Spanberger would apply these inane policies to Virginians while having an even more trifling impact on the climate,” Dayaratna added. Center of the American Experiment economists estimated the Virginia Clean Economy Act will cost an extra $3,500 per customer by 2045. After the law’s passage, Virginia’s electricity imports from out of state rose from 18% in 2020 to 40% in 2024. “Spanberger says she is committed to wind, solar, and grid batteries,” Steve Milloy, a senior fellow at the Energy & Environment Legal Institute, told The Daily Signal. “This means she is committed to ever-higher electricity prices.” “In Congress, she voted for the inflationary Green New Scam and generally supported President Joe Biden’s policies that sent gasoline prices through the roof,” Milloy added. Follow the Money The Virginia League of Conservation Voters gave Spanberger for Governor $1.38 million, and the Clean Virginia Fund contributed $700,000, according to the Virginia Public Access Project. “Spanberger is the only candidate in this race who will prioritize Virginians over big corporations by ensuring we meet the moment with clean, affordable energy and work to make electricity more affordable for Virginians instead of doubling down on dirty, expensive energy sources that line corporate polluter pockets by keeping our bills high,” Lee Francis, a spokesman for the Virginia League of Conservation Voters, told The Daily Signal. Francis said the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative “has a proven track record of lowering energy costs by incentivizing clean, and affordable energy sources over volatile coal and gas.” He claimed the programs receiving initiative funds “have a high return on investment,” preparing communities to face flooding and cutting energy costs “with programs that weatherize homes and make them more efficient.” He claimed that “increased fuel costs and infrastructure costs related to transmission and distribution, mostly to feed large energy-hungry data centers, are the largest drivers of bill increases in Virginia—not clean energy and not the [Virginia Clean Economy Act].” Clean Virginia, meanwhile, attacks the Old Dominion’s public utility companies, aiming to fight for “clean government and clean energy by fighting utility monopoly corruption.” “Abigail Spanberger’s plan for energy abundance focuses on investing in clean technologies, the only resources that can come online quickly, improve reliability, and lower costs for consumers,” Clean Virginia Executive Director Brennan Gilmore told The Daily Signal. “Clean Virginia supports her leadership to build an affordable, reliable and forward-looking energy system.” RGGI Negatives Glenn Davis, director of the Virginia Department of Energy under Youngkin, told The Daily Signal that RGGI cost Virginians $828 million, “every dollar of which was passed on to Virginians in their energy bills.” He said other states use RGGI funds to offset ratepayers’ energy bills, since the program increases costs for consumers, but Virginia Democrats used the money to fund other projects, such as the flooding preparation Francis mentioned. Davis also criticized the Virginia Clean Economy Act. The act requires companies like Dominion to buy renewable energy credits if they can’t produce enough renewable energy themselves. Earlier this year, Dominion estimated it would have to buy $5.5 billion of renewable energy credits in the next ten years in order to make benchmarks. Dominion Energy Responds “For nearly 20 years, our electricity prices have remained below the national average,” Aaron Ruby, a spokesman for Dominion Energy, told The Daily Signal. “Our prices are currently 8% below the national average, and we expect that will continue in the coming years.” Ruby said Dominion proposed a price increase earlier this year “due to significant increases in the cost of fuel for our power plants and for equipment such as utility poles, wires, cables, and transformers.” These inflationary pressures have impacted the entire economy. He also referenced a recent Washington Post article highlighting the various reasons energy costs are increasing—and noting that the proliferation of data centers plays only a very small role in price hikes. Ruby countered Clean Virginia’s attacks by saying Dominion participates in the political process “on behalf of our customers and employees.” He said the company contributes to candidates of both parties “in support of bipartisan, common sense energy policy.” Karen Wissing, a communications consultant at Appalachian Power Company, also noted that her company “faces higher interest rates and inflation, which have increased and are continuing to increase the cost of generating and delivering power.” “The company recognizes the need to provide safe, affordable electricity and works every day to keep bills as low as possible,” Wissing added. She noted that Virginian customers can expect an approximately $10 decrease in fuel costs on Nov. 1, and she referenced the company’s request with the Virginia State Corporate Commission, which could result in additional savings of approximately $11.44. Wissing also mentioned that Appalachian offers energy efficiency programs. The Spanberger campaign did not respond to The Daily Signal’s request for comment. The post Earle-Sears Slams Spanberger for Having ‘Sold Out Virginians’ by Taking Cash From Environmental Groups appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Things Kids Today Will Never Understand!

Car accidents injure over 100,000 pets annually in the United States. The PetSafe Happy Ride Dog Safety Seat offers protection through crash-tested engineering and secure harness systems. We at DogingtonPost tested multiple models to help you select the right safety seat for your dog. This guide covers size requirements, installation methods, and model comparisons to make your decision straightforward. What Makes PetSafe Happy Ride Safety Features Stand Out Harness System and Crash Protection The PetSafe Happy Ride uses a three-point attachment system that secures your dog through headrest straps, car seat straps, and seat belt loops. The Center for Pet Safety conducts crash tests at 30 mph, and products that show any breaks or tears fail certification. PetSafe models pass these rigorous standards because they distribute impact forces across multiple contact points rather than rely on single-point restraints that snap under pressure. The harness tether system connects to your dog’s harness, never the collar. This prevents neck injuries when sudden stops or crashes occur. The two-finger fit standard applies here – you should fit two fingers between the harness and your dog’s chest for proper safety without breath restriction. Extension tethers pose safety risks according to experts, so PetSafe eliminates this danger with fixed-length connections. Size Selection and Weight Limits PetSafe offers three distinct sizes that accommodate dogs up to 11.3 kg for the booster model. Small dogs that weigh 2-7 kg fit the smallest version, while medium dogs up to 11.3 kg require the largest option. Weight matters more than breed – a compact bulldog needs different size requirements than a tall whippet of similar weight. Measure your dog’s length from chest to rear and height when your dog sits. The seat must provide 5-8 cm clearance above your dog’s head to prevent impact injuries. Snug fits prevent dangerous movement during crashes, but overly tight spaces cause anxiety and overheating on longer trips. Installation Requirements and Vehicle Fit Modern vehicles with LATCH systems provide the most secure installation options. The seat belt method works in older cars but requires manual lock mechanisms that vary by manufacturer (check your vehicle manual for child restraint instructions – the same lock procedures apply to dog safety seats). Front seat installation offers better supervision but increases airbag risks for smaller dogs. Rear seats provide safer positions away from deployment zones. The raised design improves ventilation and reduces motion sickness compared to floor-level travel, which particularly benefits anxious dogs prone to car sickness. These safety features work best when you match them to your specific dog and vehicle setup. Your dog’s size and temperament will determine which features matter most for your situation. What Factors Determine the Right Safety Seat Choice Dog Size and Behavioral Assessment Your dog’s weight and dimensions determine safety seat effectiveness more than breed characteristics. Dogs that weigh 2-4 kg need different restraint systems than those that weigh 8-11 kg because impact forces scale with body mass. Measure your dog’s chest circumference at the widest point behind the front legs, then add two inches for proper fit. The American Automobile Association reports that 60% of pet owners engage in distractive behavior while they drive with pets, which makes proper size selection even more important for control. Anxious dogs require elevated positions to reduce stress and motion sickness. Dogs that pant excessively or show car anxiety benefit from booster-style seats that provide better airflow and visibility. Calm dogs adapt to standard carriers faster, while hyperactive dogs need more secure containment. Never choose a seat based on your dog’s future size – puppies grow unpredictably and safety equipment must fit current measurements. Vehicle Configuration and Installation Constraints SUVs and trucks offer more installation flexibility than compact cars due to seat height and space. Rear seats provide safer positions away from airbag deployment zones, but front seats allow better supervision of anxious dogs. Check your vehicle’s seat belt lock mechanism before you purchase – some cars require specific techniques to engage locks properly. ISOFIX systems attach directly to the car’s frame, creating a secure and stable hold that minimizes movement to keep dogs safe. Leather seats create slip issues that fabric seats avoid. Bucket seats accommodate safety seats better than bench seats because individual restraint points distribute forces more effectively. Vehicle manual instructions for child restraint installation apply directly to dog safety seats – the same lock procedures and position rules work for both applications. Travel Distance and Usage Patterns Daily commutes under 30 minutes require different features than weekend road trips that last several hours. Short trips prioritize quick installation and removal, while long journeys need maximum comfort padding and ventilation. Dogs that travel more than twice weekly develop better seat acceptance than occasional travelers. The elevated design of booster seats reduces motion sickness on longer trips (making them preferable for dogs prone to car anxiety). Regular travelers should invest in permanent installation systems rather than removable options that create setup delays and potential safety errors. These factors help narrow your choices, but specific model differences between PetSafe Happy Ride versions will determine which option delivers the best value for your situation. Which PetSafe Happy Ride Model Offers the Best Value Standard Model Core Features The PetSafe Happy Ride Booster standard model provides three secure attachment points and accommodates dogs up to 11.3 kg for approximately $45-60. This base model includes the essential 360-degree swivel harness attachment that prevents tangling and a machine-washable quilted liner. Assembly takes 10 minutes with clear instructions, and the stain-resistant fabric handles daily use effectively. The standard version lacks extra storage compartments but delivers solid crash protection through its three-point securing system. Dogs that weigh 2-7 kg fit comfortably in the smallest size, while the medium option handles dogs up to the full 11.3 kg weight limit. The basic model focuses on safety essentials without premium additions. Deluxe Version Premium Additions The deluxe version costs $75-95 but adds a zipped front storage pocket for treats and supplies, plus enhanced padding for longer trips. The premium model features thicker cushioning that reduces pressure points during extended travel (making it worth the extra cost for dogs that travel more than twice weekly). Customer reviews consistently rate the deluxe model higher for comfort during trips over one hour. However, the safety performance remains identical between versions – both pass the same crash test standards. The storage pocket proves most valuable for owners who take frequent road trips. Price Performance Comparison Price comparisons show the standard model offers better value for occasional travelers, while the deluxe version pays for itself through comfort improvements on longer journeys. Daily commuters find little benefit from the premium features, but weekend road trip enthusiasts appreciate the extra padding and storage space. The $30 price difference between models represents a 50% increase in cost for features that primarily benefit frequent travelers. Dogs that travel less than twice monthly show no preference between comfort levels (suggesting the standard model meets their needs adequately). Final Thoughts Your choice of a PetSafe Happy Ride Dog Safety Seat depends on your dog’s weight and temperament, your vehicle’s setup, and how often you travel. Dogs that weigh 2-11.3 kg benefit from the elevated position that reduces motion sickness and provides better visibility. The standard model delivers excellent crash protection for occasional travelers at $45-60, while the deluxe version at $75-95 adds comfort features for frequent travelers. Both versions pass identical 30 mph crash test standards and provide the same safety performance. Installation success requires you to follow your vehicle manual’s child restraint procedures and check that seat belt locks work properly. Always attach the tether to your dog’s harness rather than collar to prevent neck injuries (the two-finger fit rule applies to harness size for optimal safety without breath restriction). We at DogingtonPost provide detailed product evaluations and practical care tips at The Dogington Post for comprehensive reviews and expert advice on dog safety products. Your investment in a quality safety seat protects your dog from the 100,000 annual pet injuries that vehicle accidents cause. This protection also reduces driver distractions during travel and keeps both you and your pet safer on the road.

On her way home, a woman found a chocolate brown kitten all alone. The young cat was tiny but mighty at heart. Cocoa BlossomAsaAmanda, founder of Kitten Rescue Life, took in a tiny tuxedo kitten two months ago. She wasn't a typical black-and-white tuxedo. Instead, she wore a striking chocolate brown suit.Her journey began when a kind woman spotted her all alone in a parking lot. The mother cat never returned, leaving the kitten behind. Realizing she needed round-the-clock care, the woman contacted Amanda for help.Within a day, the kitten's world changed—from lying on cold pavement to sleeping comfortably in a warm bed. Kitten Rescue LifeWrapped in a little rug, the kitten, Cocoa Blossom, quickly drifted off to sleep, "comfy as a bug." At just three weeks old, she had a lot of growing to do and many feline skills to learn. She eagerly latched onto her bottle, determined to get stronger.Over the following weeks, she kept her caretaker busy day and night, with regular feedings and endless requests for affection. Kitten Rescue LifeWith nourishing meals and attentive care, Cocoa Blossom began to thrive. She developed a healthy, round belly, and her chocolate brown coat gleamed like truffles in the sun. One look from her big eyes was enough to melt hearts and get her anything she wanted.Her curiosity blossomed, too. She started toddling around her nest, eager for adventure. Kitten Rescue LifeAs her energy grew, so did her playful spirit. she bounded into boisterous play, filling the house with silly antics. "She hasn't had the opportunity to interact with other kittens yet," Asa, a volunteer with Kitten Rescue Life, shared.With several friendly foster cats already in her home, Asa welcomed Cocoa Blossom, hoping the feline crew would teach her proper cat etiquette. Kitten Rescue LifeWithin a few days, Cocoa Blossom fit right in with the rest of the clowder.She turned every corner into her personal playground, zipping through rooms, scaling cat trees, and tumbling with her new friends. They didn't just accept her; they embraced her as if she had always been part of the crew. AsaBy the time Cocoa Blossom turned two months old, her coat had deepened into a rich chocolate brown, winning hearts wherever she went.Most tuxedo cats have black-and-white fur, but Cocoa Blossom's unique coloring comes from a recessive gene that alters how black pigment is produced. It's less common but utterly stunning. AsaShe soon discovered that tails make excellent toys, at least until she pushed her luck. Her playful pounces and sneak attacks often turned into lively chase scenes and wrestling matches.The older cats taught her boundaries, while the younger kittens became her partners in crime, leading her into endless adventures and mischief. AsaWhen Cocoa Blossom was finally big enough to be spayed and placed for adoption, a loving family was already waiting for her. They had been counting down the days, eager to bring her home.She left foster care with her favorite platypus plush toy by her side. AsaThanks to the compassionate volunteers, Cocoa Blossom is flourishing in her forever home. Once a tiny orphan in a parking lot, she's now pampered and adored, living the best life. AsaShare this story with your friends. More cats and kittens at Kitten Rescue Life on Instagram@kittenrescuelife and Facebook. Thanks to Asa @shibuyarollcall.Related story: Cat is Thankful When Person Takes Her Family in, She Even Allows Their Gentle Canine to Kitten-sit

Democrats Are Still Running With This Lie About the Ballroom

Thune: I Don't Know But I've Been Told, Democrat Feet Are Gettin' Cold

Cue the Sinatra music! On Monday, MSNBC’s parent company Versant — the name of the company consisting of seven cable news channels Comcast no longer wanted to be tied down to — decreed the much-lampooned name-change for the far-left hot take factory to MS NOW would commence on Saturday, November 15, bringing to an end the network that launched on July 15, 1996. Along with the tacky name and cheap-looking logo of a waving flag with two stripes set on a blue or white background, Versant said the marketing campaign behind MS Now would be “Same Mission. New Name.” How exciting. A press release was comical, gushing that MS NOW — an acronym for “My Source for News, Opinion, and the World” — “defines the news organization’s enduring mission: To cover breaking news as it happens, provide best-in-class opinion journalism rooted in fact, and report on unfolding events around the world.” The release boasted the network has spent “over...nine months” preparing for the name change as well as “develop[ing] and buil[ding] an ambitious newsgathering model hyper-focused on the needs of the MS NOW audience” given the fact NBC correspondents will no longer be able to cross-pollinate and hold them up. Citing a D.C. bureau that’s already “produc[ed] original, evidence-based reporting and in-depth investigative journalism” and “a multi-year deal” with British outlet Sky News for foreign reporting, Versant hilariously touted an October 6 email to employees outlining their ten core values. Such values, as we noted and mocked, included “integrity” in “uphold[ing] the highest ethical standards,” “opinion” in having their “opinion journalists and contributors” operate “based on accurate, reported facts,” and “fairness” to “report the news with an open mind.” Versant also highlighted its new and fairly-recent hires such as PBS’s Laura Barrón-López, Rosa Flores from CNN, Eugene Daniels from Politico, The Washington Post’s Carol Leonnig, former ABC correspondent Erielle Reshef, and Ken Dilanian, Jacob Soboroff, and Brandy Zadrozny from NBC as proof of the network’s commitment to “newsgathering,” but what they actually did was make clear their so-called straight news shows wouldn’t upset their far-left base. And finally, they had the hilarious gall to list 28 of their “nearly 100 expert contributors” to show MS NOW is dedicated “to providing its audience with diverse perspectives and specialist analysis across all platforms.” Of the 28, they listed longtime network mainstays and new-ish troops, ranging from deranged New York Times writers Peter Baker and Michael Schmidt to Deep State spook John Brennan to far-left writers Molly Jong-Fast, Michele Norris, Catherine Rampell, Eugene Robinson, and Pablo Torre to former elected Democrats Julián Castro, Claire McCaskill, and Jon Tester, and racial arsonists in Eddie Glaude Jr. and Jason Johnson. Versant also highlighted progressive legal minds and #Resistance heroes like Mary McCord, Barbara McQuade, Tim Miller, Melissa Murray, Joyce Vance, and Andrew Weissmann as well as Jon Meacham, who had been with the network but was summarily booted once it became clear it was writing speeches for President Biden. The only so-called Republicans? Elise Jordan and John Kasich. So much for ideological diversity. Oh, and apparently Luke Russert is back with the network, so we can look forward to new blogs coming to his taxonomy term at NewsBusters.

California Governor Gavin Newsom recently alluded to running for president in 2028, telling Robert Costa on “CBS Sunday Morning” that he’d be “lying” if he said he wasn’t planning to run and that he “can’t” tell a lie.Of course, BlazeTV host Sara Gonzales can’t let him get away with acting as though he can’t tell a lie — as it’s exactly what he’s been doing for years.Most recently, Newsom told some childhood tall tales on the “All the Smoke” podcast about being raised by a mom who “came from no money and just hustled” with “two and a half jobs” to make ends meet.“It was also about paying the bills, man. It was just, like, hustling, and so I was out there kind of raising myself, turning on the TV, started just getting obsessed, sitting there with the Wonder Bread,” he said while the host laughed.“Come on, the macaroni and cheese!” he exclaimed. “This is how I grew up, bro. Every day in the backyard just bouncing the basketball, throwing the ball against the wall until the ball is just like fraying, man.”“The problem with that is that it turns out that his dad worked for the billionaire heir Gordon Getty,” Gonzales comments, before pulling up a 1991 feature in the San Francisco Chronicle called “Children of the Rich.”In one photo for the “Children of the Rich” feature, Newsom posed with several other young rich men.“So, he was super poor, living off of Wonder Bread and mac and cheese, but he was also posing for ‘Children of the Rich’ articles in 1991,” Gonzales says. “Make that make sense.”On his own show, while interviewing the late Charlie Kirk, Newsom also claimed that he had never used the term “Latinx.”“We have the receipts because not only has your office talked about it, you yourself have tweeted using the term ‘Latinx,’ talking about ‘COVID-19 disproportionately impacts the Latinx community,’ ‘children in poverty — 31% Latinx,’” Gonzales says.“That isn’t a thing. It’s not an actual term. It’s just made up because white people want to convince the Latin community that they are somehow oppressed with their language,” she continues.But the lies don’t end there.Newsom claimed that President Trump never called him before sending the National Guard to Los Angeles.“There was no call. Not even a voicemail. Americans should be alarmed that a President deploying Marines onto our streets doesn’t even know who he’s talking to,” Newsom wrote in a post on X.President Trump then released a screenshot showing a 16-minute call with Newsom.“The crazy thing is, why lie about something we clearly have receipts for?” Gonzales asks. “You know that these call logs will exist. Why lie about it?”Want more from Sara Gonzales?To enjoy more of Sara's no-holds-barred takes on news and culture, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.