YubNub Social YubNub Social
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y ·Youtube News & Oppinion

YouTube
Gutfeld! 10/7/24 FULL END SHOW | FOX BREAKING NEWS TRUMP October 7, 2024
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

Maine's Radical Solution To End Political Corruption. Super PAC's = Super Corruption
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

Maine's Radical Solution To End Political Corruption. Super PAC's = Super Corruption

Maine's Radical Solution To End Political Corruption. Super PAC's = Super Corruption - EVIL CORPORATIONS HAVE COMPLETELY HIGHJACKED OUR ENTIRE ELECTION PROCESS - Unlimited Money Means Unlimited Corruption - AIPAC (Jewish Lobby) is a Prime Example How Powerful Special Interests Have Made Politicians Their Bitches. The Power of AIPAC Alone Can Determine Which Candidates Win Elections. - This System Has Corrupted Nearly Every Politician Running For High Office. Even Trump Takes Extremely Massive Amounts of Money From These (Anti America) Special Interests. - Not Only is Our Voting System Completely Corrupt, But the Politicians Themselves Are Beholden to Big Money Mega Corporations. Not to Mention the Secret Bribery Blood Money that is Laundered and HIDDEN in Private Offshore Accounts... - ***THIS CORRUPTION MUST END*** - 292,750 Oct. 3, 2024 More Perfect Union - Maine could rein in super PACs and put limits on donations for the first time. Unlimited billionaire and corporate spending on elections has been crushing our democracy. In one month Maine voters could cap dark money and set a precedent that could save America. ----- Federal Campaign Finance Laws - https://www.usa.gov/campaign-finance-laws - How much can you donate to a political campaign - You can donate to more than one candidate in each federal election. The current contribution limits are: - $3,300 Limit to Each candidate * A SUPER PAC CAN ACCEPT UNLIMITED CONTRIBUTIONS - †“PAC” here refers to a committee that makes contributions to other federal political committees.  Independent-expenditure-only political committees (sometimes called “Super PACs”) may accept unlimited contributions, including from corporations and labor organizations. - FAIR USE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES Mirrored From: https://www.youtube.com/@moreperfectunion
Like
Comment
Share
Intel Uncensored
Intel Uncensored
1 y

"This Will Be the Last Election!" They Are  Setting Everyone Up For a MASSIVE PSY0P On NOVEMBER 5TH!
Favicon 
api.bitchute.com

"This Will Be the Last Election!" They Are Setting Everyone Up For a MASSIVE PSY0P On NOVEMBER 5TH!

"This Will Be the Last Election!" They Are Setting Everyone Up For a MASSIVE PSY0P On NOVEMBER 5TH! - THIS IS THE LAST TIME YOU WILL EVER HAVE TO VOTE??? WTF? - That's Funny. Trump Said Vote For Him and You Will Never Have to Vote Again. So Apparently if Trump or Harris Wins the Presidency, it Means an END TO ALL ELECTIONS... - 8,957 views October 7, 2024 REBEL CALL - FAIR USE FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES Mirrored From: https://www.youtube.com/@REBELCALL2024
Like
Comment
Share
Worth it or Woke?
Worth it or Woke?
1 y

Venom: The Last Dance
Favicon 
worthitorwoke.com

Venom: The Last Dance

The post Venom: The Last Dance first appeared on Worth it or Woke.
Like
Comment
Share
Worth it or Woke?
Worth it or Woke?
1 y

Wolf Man
Favicon 
worthitorwoke.com

Wolf Man

The post Wolf Man first appeared on Worth it or Woke.
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
1 y

Who inspired The Rolling Stones song ‘Mother’s Little Helper’?
Favicon 
faroutmagazine.co.uk

Who inspired The Rolling Stones song ‘Mother’s Little Helper’?

"Her husband's just a drag." The post Who inspired The Rolling Stones song ‘Mother’s Little Helper’? first appeared on Far Out Magazine.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

Harris Silent on Democrats Paying Reparations
Favicon 
spectator.org

Harris Silent on Democrats Paying Reparations

Curious. Curious indeed. The headline in the Washington Times was this: Reparations advocates find hope in Harris despite silence ahead of election The story reports: Vice President Harris, who is open to convening a federal commission to examine reparations for Black Americans, will face pressure from advocates to take concrete steps to advance the cause nationally if she wins the White House. Ms. Harris has signaled explicit support in recent years for providing reparations for Black Americans to compensate for slavery and discrimination. She signed on to a Senate bill in 2019 that would have created a federal commission to study the matter, and she called for “some form of reparations” when she ran unsuccessfully for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination. She also made a public promise in 2019 to support reparations legislation if elected president, telling Al Sharpton’s National Action Network, “When I am elected president, I will sign that bill.” Notice anything? Anything as historically obvious as, say, the Civil War? That would be this. Which of the two major American political parties — Democrats and Republicans — was founded by — gasp! — slave owners? That would be the two Democrat presidents for whom, for ages, Democrats named their annual February fundraising dinner: The Jefferson–Jackson Day Dinner. Named for Thomas Jefferson and Andrew Jackson. (Something that only recently has started to change, with some Democrats slowly aware that having a celebration in terms of slave owners is not a good look.) And obviously, it was the Republican Party that was formed by opponents to slavery and very much in opposition to slavery. Question? Which political party was a staunch supporter of slavery in its political platforms? As I noted long ago in this space when discussing what Democrats completely ignore when discussing their party history in their platforms. There is no reference to the number of Democratic Party platforms supporting slavery. There were 6 from 1840-1860. And as if that weren’t bad enough, there was this: There is no reference to the fact Democrats opposed the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the Constitution. The Thirteenth banned slavery. The Fourteenth effectively overturned the infamous 1857 Supreme Court Dred Scott decision (made by Democrat pro-slavery Supreme Court justices) by guaranteeing due process and equal protection to former slaves. The Fifteenth gave black Americans the right to vote. All of that decidedly vivid history of Democrat Party support for slavery is aside from these other facts: There is no reference to “Jim Crow” as in “Jim Crow laws,” nor is there reference to the role Democrats played in creating them. These were the post-Civil War laws passed enthusiastically by Democrats in that pesky 52-year part of the DNC’s missing years. These laws segregated public schools, public transportation, restaurants, rest rooms and public places in general (everything from water coolers to beaches). The reason Civil Rights heroine Rosa Parks became famous is that she sat in the front of a “whites only” bus, the “whites only” designation the direct result of Democrats.” There is no reference to the fact Democrats opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1866. It was passed by the Republican Congress over the veto of Democratic President Andrew Johnson. The law was designed to provide blacks with the right to own private property, sign contracts, sue and serve as witnesses in a legal proceeding. There is no reference to four Democrat platforms, 1908-1920, that are silent on blacks, segregation, lynching, and voting rights as racial problems in the country mount. By contrast the GOP platforms of those years specifically address “Rights of the Negro” (1908), oppose lynchings (in 1912, 1920, 1924, 1928) and, as the New Deal kicks in, speak out about the dangers of making blacks “wards of the state.” There’s more here in terms of the history of the Democrat Party. The use of the Ku Klux Klan as what historians call the party’s “terrorist arm” against black Americans. Etc., etc., etc. With all of this and more in the party’s history — and the Democrats current and soon-to-be-past leaders — Harris and President Joe Biden — are utterly silent on their party paying reparations? Really? Really? How about Harris, Biden, and the rest of Democrat Party leaders at all levels apologizing to America’s African American population for their decidedly serious support for slavery? Their use of federal and state governments to support slavery? And issuing a pledge that the Democrat Party will start payouts on financial reparations from the party’s treasury and millions of white members to black Americans and the descendants of slaves? Descendants whose ancestors were in fact enslaved by the then-leaders of the Democrat Party to get votes from the pro-slavers of the day? And note as well this interesting sentence about Harris in that Washington Times article: She also made a public promise in 2019 to support reparations legislation if elected president, telling Al Sharpton’s National Action Network, “When I am elected president, I will sign that bill.” Say what? Where is Al Sharpton’s National Action Network demanding that the party that enslaved black Americans pay up? Maybe with its first check to Sharpton and his African-American members in his National Action Network? Yet Sharpton was silent as a mouse on the subject of Democrats paying reparations. In short? Reparations is not a serious subject unless and until the Democratic Party and its leadership pays up for the party’s history of supporting slavery. Will that ever happen? Are you kidding? What Kamala Harris is about in the reparations discussion is purely politics. And that’s all. Most assuredly, she has not the slightest intention of leading her party in an apology for its decidedly slavery-supporting history. Much less for paying reparations for that history. Imagine that. READ MORE: Vance Outclasses Walz in Debate That Validates His Selection Biden Isn’t Sabotaging Harris, Is He? The Imaginary Electoral College Advantage for Trump The post Harris Silent on Democrats Paying Reparations appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
Biden/Harris Administration Completely Dropped the Ball
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y ·Youtube Politics

YouTube
The news came to the United States slowly.
Like
Comment
Share
Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
1 y

10 West Coast rock albums you really need to hear... and one to avoid
Favicon 
www.loudersound.com

10 West Coast rock albums you really need to hear... and one to avoid

From surf guitars to psychedelia, peace to paranoia, the 60s sound of Los Angeles and San Francisco was bright and multicoloured
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 58301 out of 103389
  • 58297
  • 58298
  • 58299
  • 58300
  • 58301
  • 58302
  • 58303
  • 58304
  • 58305
  • 58306
  • 58307
  • 58308
  • 58309
  • 58310
  • 58311
  • 58312
  • 58313
  • 58314
  • 58315
  • 58316
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund