Panama City, FL - - In lieu of adding more in-person witnesses to a trial with a hard deadline, Tuesday’s proceedings in the $1 billion defamation trial against CNN featured the sworn deposition videos of five CNN employees who had their fingerprints on the offending report. One of the more eyebrow-raising testimonies of the bunch came from CNN anchor Jake Tapper who’s show - The Lead - the report initially ran on. In his testimony, Tapper claimed he didn’t know his title nor cared about the ratings of his show. But according to a post he made on X, that could be a lie since he has touted good ratings in the past. Near the beginning of the video, after giving a brief overview of his film school education, Tapper was asked about where he was currently employed, “CNN,” and what his title was. That’s when the first curious answer cropped up: “I think it's chief Washington anchor and senior Washington correspondent. But I don't pay a tremendous amount of attention to titles. But I think that’s what it is. I am the anchor of several shows on CNN.” There’s a jump in the video and Tapper is seen being asked about the ratings of his show where he proclaims that he doesn’t care about them: VEL FREEDMAN (lead counsel, plaintiff): Mr. Tapper, can you give an overview of viewership numbers for your show The Lead, let’s start with? TAPPER: I cannot.  FREEDMAN: You have no idea how many people watch The Lead on an average basis? TAPPER: I do not pay attention to ratings.     After giving an explanation of how the Nielsen ratings system worked, Tapper reiterated: “And that Neilsen rating is how advertisers and shows and television networks determine how many people are watching the show at any given moment. And I do not pay attention to the Neilsen ratings. So, yeah.” When delivering deposition testimony, the subject gets sworn in just like if they were testifying in court. While Tapper claimed underoath that he didn’t care about the ratings, Peter Hasson, editor for the Washington Free Beacon, published a screenshot of Tapper’s X account where he was indeed touting the ratings of one of his “several shows on CNN” and even seemed to hint that he tracked them. “Ratings go up and ratings go down, but UNITED STATES OF SCANDAL had the highest ratings in the key demo in cable news on Sunday … and was the most watched show on CNN! Thank you for watching!” he wrote.   https://t.co/vkAGHxD1vy pic.twitter.com/P9tUnW7QEd — Peter J. Hasson (@peterjhasson) January 14, 2025   He seemed pretty excited about that information; that very much seemed like he cared about and paid attention to the ratings. Further, Freedman brought up his speaking engagement at the Ford School of Public Policy at the University of Michigan, where he lashed out at Fox News. “And I think the question is, if all you care about is clicks and newsstand sales and circulation and you don’t care at all about the truth and the facts, you end up with a settlement with Dominion Election Systems,” he sniped to the applause of the crowd. He went on to grimly proclaim: “If all you care about is that, and you don’t care about the responsibility - the grave responsibility we have to be fair and to be honest, then you are a cancer on the democracy we have.” Freedman turned it around by saying, “I’m just talking here about whether or not a news organization that tells willful lies is a cancer on society. Can you answer that question?” Tapper became angry: I mean, you can think whatever you want…I made a statement about the non-hypothetical, months-long campaign against Dominion Voting against Smartmatic against all the people that participated in the process in 2020 … You are asking me to comport with a metaphor that I used a year ago specifically about one specific news – or purported news organization and the opinion I had about how damaging those lies were to the American democracy. And you’re asking me to take that metaphor and extend it to any other time that any other media organization lied willingly, and I just don’t have an opinion on it. Tapper also seemed to play dumb on the budget for his show: FREEDMAN: Does The Lead have a budget? TAPPER: I assume so, but I don’t know what it is. FREEDMAN: Do you have any idea of how that budget is determined? TAPPER: No. And when it came to traveling, Tapper testified that he would just let CNN deal with all the logistics and he went where they permitted him to go. “That’s my request, but I am not in charge of any of the ‘how do we do it.’ Other people do that,” he testified. Tapper may have been doing his best impersonation of Sgt. Schultz from Hogan’s Heroes, “I know nothing. Nothing!”

The taxpayer-funded lefties at National Public Radio felt compelled to defend efforts of “DEI” (i.e. the left-wing “diversity-equity-inclusion” racket) that’s been discredited both intellectually and at the ballot box last November on Friday’s All Things Considered, in “Why right-wing influencers are blaming the California wildfires on diversity efforts,” by reporter Lisa Hagen. From the radio transcript: Juana Summers, Host: Right-wing media and influencers have been blaming the scale of wildfire destruction in Los Angeles on diversity, equity and inclusion efforts. Billionaire Elon Musk and others circulated screenshots of the LA Fire Department's racial equity action plan. The city's fire chief also happens to be the first woman and openly gay person in that role. The chief, her fire department and the city government have become targets in right-wing media. NPR's Lisa Hagen reports on how it's part of a wider pattern. And if “right-wing media” is attacking you, left-wing NPR will ride to your defense. Lisa Hagen: Here's what it sounds like to blame a national tragedy on workplace diversity training. This is Charlie Kirk, founder of the right-wing nonprofit Turning Point USA, on his podcast this week. Charlie Kirk, podcast clip: When you focus your government on diversity, equity, inclusion, LGBTQ pet projects, and you are captured by environmentalists, we have been warning for years that you are worried about abstractions, but you can't do the basic stuff. NPR was comfortable throwing around the term “right-wing,” but found no labels for the leftist academics they cited to decry the supposed racism inherent in valid questions after a grievously flawed response to a natural disaster. Hagen: This has become a common refrain for some on the right for all kinds of disasters and tragic events, including the Baltimore bridge collapse, aircraft safety failures and the effectiveness of the Secret Service. Stoking anger about diversity efforts is shorthand for a much larger story, according to Ian Haney Lopez. Ian Haney Lopez:: The story is something like this. We as a society used to hire on the basis of competence and meritocracy, but that system has been hijacked by powerful minorities. Hagen: He's a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley, who focuses on evolving forms of racism. Lopez: Again and again, we see these efforts to trigger people's latent resentments against groups that historically have been socially marginalized, socially reviled, but to do so in terms that seek to clothe themselves in a commitment to fairness or excellence. Hagen: It's the definition of a dog whistle, he says, and it's taken various forms since at least the end of the Civil War…. She let DEI consultant Lily Zheng defend her profession against the “chilling effect” of “this toxic discourse.” Hagen: Zheng says DEI efforts are attempts to push the status quo toward meritocracy. But popular distortions about it and things like critical race theory have been fueled by right-wing think tanks and influencers like Chris Rufo. Even the clip that aired from that so-called right-wing distorter Rufo was anodyne and didn’t make his ideological point. Christopher Rufo: We want to say it over and over and over. We want people to be thinking about DEI, people to be debating about DEI, talking about DEI in policy language. But then we want to translate this into a concrete and emotional space. [The text version of NPR’s story contained a sharper Rufo counter-attack.]

Rep. AOC Goes on Rant About Women Bleeding Out in Parking Lots Across the Country

Democrat Mark Kelly Has Positive Words for Pete Hegseth on Policy but Will It Translate to a ‘Yes’ Vote?

Scott Jennings: Democrats Sent Their Dumbest Members and They Didn’t Land a Glove on Hegseth

Nate Silver Wonders When the Pendulum Will Swing Back Toward Liberals

What the Heck? Gavin Newsom Does Shimmy Dance and Grins at Reporters As He Address Catastrophic Wildfires

The Senate confirmation hearing for Department of Homeland Security nominee Kristi Noem was postponed two days over a delay in the South Dakota governor's FBI background check, according to reports.

The new Democrat mayor of Portland, Oregon, is requiring hundreds of non-union city employees to begin working in person full-time starting this spring.

Maryland Democrat Gov. Wes Moore signaled Tuesday that he was willing to move out of lockstep with the Democrat establishment and work with President-elect Donald Trump."I'm not the leader of the resistance," Moore told CNN's Jake Tapper. "I'm the governor of Maryland. My...