The Trump-Vance campaign filed a complaint with the Federal Election Committee alleging that the Washington Post had given the Harris-Walz campaign numerous illegal "in-kind" contributions through its coverage. The filing noted that the Washington Post had publicly declined to endorse a presidential candidate but went on to accuse the outlet of "aggressively" boosting its paid advertising campaign to increase the reach of its articles related to the election. It was a 'reasonable inference' that the Harris team had 'communicated' strategy to the Post.The complaint relied on independent reporting showing the Post had boosted articles that were "neutral" with their coverage of the Harris campaign but were far more negative when covering the Trump campaign. “To wit, one of the promoted articles highlighted how the Harris digital team was pushing content on social media claiming people were leaving President Trump’s rallies early,” wrote Gary Lawkowski, an attorney for the Trump campaign. “A month later, The Washington Post published an article, which was reportedly boosted by The Post, on the same topic, with a similar editorial framing," the complaint said. He goes on to say that it was a "reasonable inference" that the Harris team had "communicated" strategy to the Post and that it was boosting articles that defend and support a narrative to favor the Democrat narrative. "The Commission should find reason to believe a violation has occurred and passes an appropriate penalty for this infusion of dark money into the 2024 campaign," the complaint said. The complaint comes on the same day that talk radio show host Hugh Hewitt quit as a contributor to the Washington Post after blowing up on a livestream feed over the mischaracterizations by others at the Post about election irregularities. "This is the most unfair election ad I've ever been a part of. You guys are working. That's fine," said Hewitt as he took off his headset. "I'm done!" Many in the media and on the left went into full meltdown mode when the Washington Post refused to endorse a presidential candidate. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Tucker Carlson revealed on X his tongue-in-cheek response to a New York Times reporter asking him if the gold and black tie he wore during his speech at the Trump rally in Madison Square Garden was to show subtle support for the Proud Boys.Adam Satariano, a technology reporter based in London, asked Carlson if he wore the tie on purpose because allegedly the Proud Boys believe he was showing support for the group, since they use those same colors in their branding. 'I hope you're filled with guilt and self-loathing for sending me a text like this.'"Is this the case? At the rally at Madison Square Garden in New York, was Mr. Carlson's choice of wearing black and gold a sign of support for the Proud Boys?" Satariano asked, giving a deadline to respond of Friday at 2 p.m. ET."I just received the inquiry you sent about the tie I wore at Donald Trump's rally. ... Yes, that is an official Proud Boys necktie. I received it at my Proud Boys initiation ceremony several years ago, after swearing a blood oath to the global fascist revolution and the sacred principles of Q Anon," Carlson replied."As you can imagine, I wouldn't normally admit this. The rules of secret societies being what they are, anything related to dress code is supposed to be confidential. But in this case, I've been outfoxed by your relentless shoe-leather journalism. Darn you, New York Times. You win again," Carlson concluded. Carlson shared his response to Satariano with the caption, "The New York Times knows a Proud Boys necktie when they see one."Carlson has recently been on the offensive against reporters who request comment about ridiculous topics.He posted his exchange with a different New York Times reporter who asked him about statements regarding the upcoming election that far-left Media Matters has called "misinformation.""This is why you got into journalism? It's shameful. I hope you're filled with guilt and self-loathing for sending me a text like this," Carlson told Nico Grant.When Grant pressed Carlson on the topic, Carlson replied, "Why would I participate in your attempt to smear me? No thanks. But I do hope you'll quote what I wrote above and also note that I told you to f*** off, which I am now doing. Thanks."The New York Times did not respond to Blaze News' request for comment.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

A USPS mailbox in Michigan was vandalized over the weekend, potentially affecting local voters who had cast an absentee ballot, a new report from WZZM claims.Sometime between 11 a.m. on Saturday and 9 a.m. on Monday, someone apparently vandalized the mailbox outside the post office in Twin Lake, a rural area of Michigan about 45 minutes north of Grand Rapids.'The good news is we have time before the election.'What's worse, at least two local residents claimed to have deposited absentee ballots in the mailbox, but officials could not locate those votes.Blue Lake Township Clerk Jeff Abram told WZZM he did not even learn about the apparent vandalism until a resident contacted him about his absentee ballot."I had a voter come into my office yesterday and said he deposited his ballot in the Twin Lake post office box that was outside the collection box, and he wanted to know if I had his ballot yet," Abram explained.Just 10 minutes later, another resident came inquiring about an absentee ballot that had been deposited in the mailbox. Abram said he could not find either ballot.Abram added that no one knows the motive behind the alleged crime or how much mail might be missing."I hope it's not to get the ballots. Again, we don't know what kind of mail was taken or how much was taken, but I do know that I do have two constituents that didn't get their ballots," he reiterated.Abram confirmed to the outlet that he spoiled the ballots of the two residents who contacted him and issued them new ones.He and other area clerks worry that other absentee voters, unaware of the allegedly stolen mail, might be affected. Anyone who placed an absentee ballot in that mailbox during that 46-hour window is urged to track their ballots online or call their local clerk so that they won't be disenfranchised."There are also two neighboring townships that use that post office branch as well. They too should contact their respective clerks to see the status of their ballot," Abrams said in a statement to Blaze News."The good news is we have time before the election if we need to spoil their current ballot and reissue them another ballot before the November 5 election," he added.Whether any suspects in the case have been identified is unclear. Blaze News reached out to the Twin Lake postmaster, who directed us to the U.S. Postal Service media contact. Blaze News was then redirected twice more. The final USPS source Blaze News contacted did not respond to a request for comment.H/T: Gateway PunditLike Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The Trump-Vance campaign has filed a lawsuit against Bucks County for turning away Republican voters — and they’ve won. A Pennsylvania judge on Wednesday sided with the Trump campaign and extended the in-person voting option in Bucks County, as long lines on the final day had voters fearing they were being shut out completely. One woman was even arrested at the polling location for “influencing” voters by asking them to all stay in line rather than leave out of frustration. Voters now have until Friday. “MASSIVE. We just won in Bucks County PA. Judge just ruled that Josh Shapiro’s buddies violated state election code by blocking people from voting with uniformed officers - we all saw the videos. Early in person Voting is now EXTENDED until 5pm. Get back in line, Bucks!” Jack Posobiec wrote in a post on X. “Why were these people out there just cutting the lines short in the first place Chris, in Pennsylvania?” Jill Savage asks Christopher Bedford on “Blaze News Tonight.” “Well, it was active voter suppression,” Bedford explains. “And right now, all we know is the police officers who were sent there, who made arrests, who blocked people, and I’m really curious.” “The Democrat judge has said votes were suppressed here, that’s why they elongated this. Now, Bucks County is an interesting spot just outside of Philadelphia. It’s always been divided, long before Donald Trump,” he continues, adding, “Someone gave the order. They can’t hide behind that.” Want more from 'Blaze News Tonight'?To enjoy more provocative opinions, expert analysis, and breaking stories you won’t see anywhere else, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

Star Wars Author Has Epic Response to Claims That Star Wars Is Progressive

Take the L! Self-Hating RINO Jonah Goldberg's Statement About Pushing Trump/Liz Cheney LIE Goes SO WRONG

WATCH: This Lefty Fever Dream Political Ad Is the CRAZIEST Thing You'll See All Day

BOOM! Conservative Woman DROPS WaPo Harpy INSISTING Cowering Republican Women Lie About Voting (Thread)

Politico Asks If Stacey Abrams Can 'Still Deliver Georgia' (and People Have Questions)

Did Her Teleprompter Go Out Again? Kamala's Record Starts Skipping at Las Vegas Rally (Watch)