President Donald Trump issued a Truth Social post on Monday that centered on a major Supreme Court case that could reshape the limits of presidential power over U.S. trade policy. President Trump warned that the U.S. Supreme Court “was given the wrong numbers” regarding the economic stakes of the pending tariff case. He stated that if the Court rules against him, the resulting “unwind” of the tariff system — reversing investments, refunds, and related measures — would exceed $3 trillion. He characterized that scenario as an “insurmountable National Security Event,” warning it could devastate the U.S. economy and threaten the country’s sustainability. Trump’s statement is both an economic and political message, emphasizing that the stakes of the Supreme Court’s decision extend well beyond trade law. He suggests that an unfavorable ruling could require returning massive tariff revenues collected under his administration’s 2025 “reciprocal tariffs,” potentially exceeding $3 trillion when including lost investment and refunds. This would unwind a significant source of federal revenue and destabilize fiscal planning. Trump is also framing tariffs as essential to protecting U.S. manufacturing and reducing dependence on foreign suppliers. Therefore, reversing them would not only hurt the economy but also compromise U.S. national security. By calling it a “national security event,” Trump connects trade policy to his broader presidential authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), arguing that tariffs are a legitimate tool for addressing threats tied to trade deficits and foreign economic influence. Trump’s claim that the Supreme Court “was given the wrong numbers” implies he believes the economic consequences have been understated to the justices, a move aimed at shaping public perception and potentially influencing the Court’s understanding of the stakes. The Supreme Court case, Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, Inc., consolidates challenges to Trump’s use of IEEPA to impose wide-reaching tariffs without explicit congressional approval. The Court of International Trade and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled that the IEEPA does not authorize the president to impose tariffs. Lower courts have ruled against Trump, saying that IEEPA does not authorize open-ended tariffs and that such economic measures require a clear congressional delegation. If the justices affirm those rulings, it could force the government to refund hundreds of billions — possibly trillions — in tariff payments, upend trade contracts, and reshape the executive’s emergency powers. On the other hand, if the Court rules in favor of the administration, it will dramatically expand the president’s authority to set trade policy under emergency declarations. The federal government collected about $213 billion in tariffs through September 2025, with monthly records of more than $31 billion in late summer.  Some forecasts project around $3 trillion in tariff revenue over a decade. The Congressional Budget Office estimates these tariffs reduce deficits by $2.8 trillion over ten years but slightly dampen GDP and increase inflation by 0.4% by 2027. According to a study by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, tariffs haven’t driven up consumer prices as much as some critics have predicted, because businesses want to see where tariff rates settle before they adjust their prices.

At least 15 people were killed and dozens more were wounded in two separate suicide bombings in Pakistan on Monday and Tuesday, and eight people were killed in a car explosion in India. The latest bombing targeted a district court building in Islamabad, killing 12 people and wounding 27 more on Tuesday, Reuters reported. Authorities said that the attacker attempted to enter the court building but was unsuccessful and then targeted a police car. All of those killed in the attack were civilians, while four police officers were also wounded, according to The Washington Post. The bombing in Islamabad came just hours after a suicide bomber targeted a military school in Pakistan’s northwest territory. Three people were killed in that bombing, and militants stormed the school, where at least three of them remain holed up. While no terror group has claimed responsibility for either of the attacks, the Pakistani government suspects that terrorists backed by India and the Taliban in Afghanistan carried out the deadly bombings. Pakistani officials believe that the Pakistani Taliban, which the government suspects of being supported by India and Afghanistan, planned the bombing in Islamabad. “The attack on Pakistani citizens by Indian proxy terrorist groups is condemnable,” said Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif. The attack in Islamabad came just hours after a car exploded in India’s capital, New Delhi, killing eight people and wounding 20 more. Indian officials said they were still trying to determine whether the blast was from an issue with the vehicle or was a targeted attack, The Wall Street Journal reported. Authorities are investigating the car explosion under an anti-terrorism law, and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi believes that the explosion in New Delhi was an attack on his country. “The conspirators behind this will not be spared,” Modi said. “All those responsible will be brought to justice.” The bombings in Pakistan and India threaten to reignite tensions between the two countries, months after they exchanged missile attacks and bombings and engaged in border skirmishes. In April, India launched airstrikes at targets in Pakistan, saying that it was hitting Pakistan-backed terrorist militia infrastructure after terrorists killed 26 people in Indian territory. The Pakistani government, however, accused India of killing civilians in the strikes and targeting mosques. Pakistan responded with its own mortar attack on India. The Trump administration quickly got involved in ceasefire negotiations between the two countries in May, and India and Pakistan agreed to stop fighting after weeks of retaliatory attacks. The fighting between India and Pakistan was especially concerning for the Trump administration, as the two countries are also considerable nuclear powers. President Donald Trump said that his trade policies helped end the conflict between the two countries and prevent a “potential nuclear disaster.” “I called them up and I said, ‘You go to war and we’re not doing a trade deal.’ … And 24 hours later, they called me [and said], ‘We have decided not to do it.’ We stopped the war. We stopped the potential nuclear disaster because of trade,” the president said last month.

For many people, co-parenting with an ex and their new partner is a challenge. Seeing the person you once loved in love with someone else is extremely emotional. But every once in a while, a very special relationship forms in the most surprising way. For more than a decade, Amanda McCowan has coparented her children with her ex-husband Joshua Maples and his current wife, Angela Maples. In 2022, Angela began experiencing health problems that required dialysis treatment. Sadly, doctors told her the prognosis looked grim, and it was time to look for a kidney donor. “Your kidneys are completely failing. We may need to talk about other arrangements. I knew what that meant. I didn’t have much time left,” Angela told Fox 4. Amanda and Angela had their ups and downs early on. “We’ve been through so many coparenting situations in the last 10 years, some of them not so great, honestly. It’s hard. Co-parenting is hard,” Amanda said. “I joke that she is the tequila to my margarita.” As the years passed, the women solidified a strong relationship by When Angela got sick, Amanda made a big decision. Amanda Looked Into Being A Kidney Donor For Angela “I ended up getting a call from the care coordinator. She said, ‘You’re not just a match. You are a perfect match,’” Amanda said. Joshua told Fox 4 that the entire situation is nothing short of a miracle. “I knew it was God. There’s no other way to put it,” Joshua said. “It’s been a lot of healing and growth. She does her clinics and Amanda and her, they both talk to each other several times a day, just checking in on each other, from big things to small things.” Right now, the woman is doing well post-op op and Angela is fighting. She told Fox 4 that now she feels she has a deeper purpose. “The goal for me is to restore hope to the hopeless,” said Angela. This story’s featured image can be found here. The post Woman Finds Unlikely Kidney Donor In Her Husband’s Ex-Wife appeared first on InspireMore.

Keisha Gerber lives with her five children in Blackford County, Indiana. Keisha has a very busy schedule, and for 12 years, her next-door neighbor, Nina Osgood, has been a godsend for the mother. The children adore Nina, and they all care for each other like family. “She’s amazing,” Keisha told WANE. “That lady would give the shirt off her back… She does everything for me and my kids.” Nina told WANE she helps with the children when Keisha is at work. Sometimes she helps them get ready for school, and other times she helps with wardrobe repairs. Anything the kids need, Nina will provide. But recently it was Nina Osgood who needed help, and the kids jumped right in. Nina Osgood’s Home Caught Fire The children noticed that Nina Osgood’s home was on fire and rushed in to save their beloved neighbor. “It was black smoke rolling in when Nina was coming out, so she was like coughing,” one of the children told WANE. Keisha Gerber shared the story on Facebook, and it blew friends and loved ones away. “I must give a shout-out to my kids. They were heroes today. If my 8-year-old daughter Brenna, my 7-year-old nephew Grant, and my 11-year-old son Reece hadn’t noticed the smoke coming from her kitchen window while they were in our kitchen, & of course Kailyn for waking me up to call 911. We would have lost so much more than what was already gone,” she wrote. “They saw the fire and smoke and acted right away! They rushed over to wake our neighbor, shouting for her to get out of the house; they even had the courage to go inside and rescue her.” “Omgosh Thank you Jesus for your kids quick reactions and thoughtfulness!” A friend wrote. “Great job kids for your fast response great job keshia for teaching your kids,” another person agreed. Nina Osgood said the children saved her life. “They say, about 15 more minutes, I’d be dead,” Nina said. “So they was little heroes.” What incredible kids. Their mother must be so proud. This story’s featured image can be found here. The post Hero Children Save Neighbor From Horrific House Fire appeared first on InspireMore.

GOP lawmakers secured a provision in the shutdown deal taking aim at the Biden FBI’s “Arctic Frost” surveillance campaign into a vast swath of Republicans and conservative entities. The measure, tucked inside a Senate legislative branch appropriation bill that passed Monday night, allows senators whose phone records were seized without their knowledge during former special […]

'Is that a pro-MAGA position'