Infection Free Zone is a challenging game‚ although with a few console commands‚ youll be able to make it a cakewalk. There arent any silly commands yet‚ but we do have a long list of practical ones.How to access the console and enable cheats in Infection Free ZoneBefore you can input these commands and modify Infection Free Zone‚ youll first need to access the console and activate cheats‚ otherwise they wont work.Press the tilde key (should be next to you 1 key) to open the console.Click on the small question mark in the bottom right corner of the console.Click on Enable Cheats.Screenshot: PC InvasionWith these steps done‚ cheats will work when you input them into the console. A small message telling you to have fun will appear also‚ which I think is pretty fun.All cheats and commands in Infection Free ZoneThere are a lot of commands in Infection Free Zone‚ and thankfully‚ the console will gi...

Written and directed by Oliver Stone‚ Platoon is a 1986 Vietnam War film following a U.S. Army volunteer and his time during the war and the question of morality during wartime. Based on Stone';s own experiences as an infantryman during the conflict‚ the film has been praised for its realism and was an unexpected success‚ becoming one of the most renowned American war films. Oliver Stone is a...Source

Four years have passed since the onset of COVID-19 and the global mishandling of the diseases spread. Now‚ the same governments and international organizations that lied about the last pandemic are negotiating a new pandemic agreement and amendments to the International Health Regulations at the World Health Organization.The main culprit hasnt changed. Although the Chinese Communist Party hasnt been held accountable for its complete refusal to adhere to previous agreements under the regulations or its ongoing obstruction of a thorough investigation into the origins of the COVID-19 virus‚ Beijing is now collaborating with the Biden administration on this new accord.So naturally‚ the new agreement advances Chinas interests. Successive drafts focus on everything from sending taxpayer dollars overseas to weakening intellectual property rights and empowering the World Health Organization over the national sovereignty of the United States. Yes‚ thats the same WHO that failed to insert a team of global experts in the first few weeks of the COVID-19 outbreak in China (as required by the International Health Regulations)‚ instead capitulating to the Chinese Communist Party and allowing it to define the international response.The latest version of the agreement even mandates that parties provide financial and technical assistance to developing countries. Of course‚ the United States has a long‚ robust history of providing such assistancePresident George W. Bushs Presidents Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief‚ or PEPFAR‚ is one good examplebut such assistance has always been voluntary‚ not obligatory.Unsurprisingly‚ China stands to benefit from these provisions intended to help poor countries. Despite having the second-largest economy in the world‚ the United Nations considers China to be a developing country. Thats right. The country that started the COVID-19 pandemic not only will suffer zero consequences for its actions but‚ should the United States sign this agreement‚ stands to benefit from mandatory transfers of funds from U.S. taxpayers.China also would benefit from other provisions in the agreement that push governments to:Promote sustainable and geographically diversified production of pandemic-related products (such as vaccines).Invest in developing country capacity and access to proprietary research. Use the flexibilities of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights to override patents.Encourage rights holders to forego or reduce royalties and consider time-bound waivers of intellectual property rights.China‚ notorious for its theft of intellectual property‚ would be sure to exploit this last privilege.All of this would severely curtail future investment in health researchexactly the opposite incentive that should be applied if we are to be prepared for a future pandemic. And to make matters worse‚ the agreement almost entirely ignores addressing the countless shortcomings of current international processes in responding to pandemics‚ such as obligating governments to grant immediate access to international health expert teams to assess the threat of suspected outbreaks and to provide full and timely disclosure of genomic data.Of course‚ overseeing sustainable and geographically diversified production‚ massive transfers‚ and distribution of up to 20% of diagnostics‚ therapeutics‚ or vaccines during a pandemic comes with a hefty price tag. The exact amount isnt specified‚ but it is sure to include several commas.In addition‚ the agreement would take a sledgehammer to Americans First Amendment free speech rights. The willingness of governments to use the pandemic to clamp down on unpopular ideas and opinions to protect public health and safety has proven durable. And this new agreement instructs governments to cooperate‚ in accordance with national law‚ in preventing misinformation and disinformation. China and Russia need no encouragement to censor speech. However‚ such language in an international agreement will encourage those in free countries who similarly wish to suppress unpopular opinions under the guise of countering misinformation and disinformation.Indeed‚ the World Health Organization itself seems offended by criticism. Earlier this year‚ WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said negotiations were occurring in a difficult environment‚ facing a torrent of fake news‚ lies‚ and conspiracy theories. Ironically‚ this argument was the same one used against conservatives who subscribed to the increasingly credible lab leak theory.In short‚ the new pandemic agreement should alarm all Americans. The agreement is far more focused on redistributing income‚ transferring technology‚ and weakening intellectual property than on preventing‚ detecting‚ and responding to pandemics in the first place. It failed to address the elephant in the roomthe total lack of enforcement in the International Health Regulationsand as written‚ it is nothing short of a power grab by the Communist China-controlled World Health Organization.Our government must wholly reject it.Originally published by The Epoch TimesThe post Stuck on Failure at WHO appeared first on The Daily Signal.

The state of Idaho is on a roll when it comes to pushing against LGBT ideology. In April 2020‚ Idaho became the first state to enact legislation that prevented transgender-identifying athletes from participating in girls and womens sports. TheFairness in Womens Sports Act‚ signed by Idaho Gov. Brad Little‚ a Republican‚ declared it a violation of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 for federally funded education programs or activities to operate‚ sponsor‚ or facilitate athletic programs or activities that allow individuals of the male sex to participate in programs or activities that are designated for women or girls.That same month‚ Little signed a bill that prohibits transgender people from changing their birth certificates to match their gender identities‚ The New York Timesreported. Last month‚ the governorsigned House Bill 668‚ which blocks the use of public funds for gender-affirming procedures. As NewsNationstated‚ Since being elected governor in 2019‚ Little has signed at least half a dozen laws that fight to protect women and biological realities. And this week‚ Littlesignedtwo more bills as wins for common sense.House Bill 538was signed on Monday‚ which stipulates that schools cannot require staff or students to use preferred pronouns or names. The second‚ signed on Tuesday‚ wasHouse Bill 421. It states‚ In human beings‚ there are two‚ and only two‚ sexes: male and female. In no case is an individuals sex determined by stipulation or self-identification. Most notably‚ in addition to ruling that sex and gender were synonymous‚ this bill codifiesin state law biological definitions for woman‚ man‚ and other sex-based terms‚ making [Idaho] the fifth to exclude men who identify as women from being legally recognized as female.According to The Washington Times‚ states that adoptedsimilarlegislation in the past year are Kansas‚ Tennessee‚ Oklahoma‚ and Nebraska. And states such as Alabama‚ Arizona‚ Iowa‚ Kentucky‚ Louisiana‚ and Mississippi have related bills on their radars.These bills were strongly supported Idaho Republicans‚ but in no way were they spared from backlash. The left-wing American Civil Liberties Union of Idahocondemnedthe passing of House Bill 668 last month‚ stating it was a cave-in to the hateful demands of far-right extremists at the expense of the safety‚ security‚ and health of Idahos transgender community.Additionally‚ itpostedon X‚ Idahos legislators are using LGBTQ+ people‚ communities of color‚ and immigrants as political scapegoats‚ creating a less inclusive‚ less safe‚ and less vigorous Idaho. It is supremely un-American‚ and we will not stop resisting. The same day as that post‚ LGBT activists dropped48‚000 paper heartsin the Idaho Capitol as a form of protest. Idahos legislators are using LGBTQ+ people‚ communities of color‚ and immigrants as political scapegoats‚ creating a less inclusive‚ less safe‚ and less vigorous Idaho.It is supremely un-American‚ and we will not stop resisting. #idpol #idleg https://t.co/NbV99L1WRl ACLU of Idaho (@acluidaho) April 2‚ 2024But despite this backlash‚ many are celebrating the bills that further protect biological truth and the right to free speech.Riley Gaines‚ a former NCAA swimmer and a prominent voice in the fight to protect women‚sharedon X‚ Thanks to [Gov. Little] for his decisive action signing HB 421 into law to fundamentally define what everyone already knows.Adding to the celebration‚ Independent Womens Voice‚ a conservative nonprofit‚ wrote in astatement‚ Idahos HB 421 is an important step in helping to preserve single-sex spaces that ensure privacy‚ safety‚ and equal opportunity. Jennifer Braceras‚ Independent Womens Voice vice president of legal affairs‚ added‚ Using the term gender to mean biological sex is confusing and misleading. Legislators must say what they mean‚ and judges and unelected bureaucrats must not twist the meaning of scientific terms to undermine the rights of women and girls.The statement concluded‚ Independent Womens Voice commends the legislators who supported the bill and calls on legislators to avoid conflating sex with gender in state law where possible.In addition‚ Doreen Denny‚ senior adviser at Concerned Women for America‚ shared this statement with The Washington Stand:Idaho has been a leader in taking a stand against gender activism. In 2020‚ Idaho Rep. Barbara Ehardt led passage of the first Save Womens Sports law at the state level paving the way for the dozens of states that have followed. These latest bills signed by Idaho Gov. Brad Little respond to the pressing need for clarity about the unchangeable truth of being male and female. Law and policy must be clear about the meaning of sex. Legal protections against coercive policies requiring allegiance to preferred pronouns and other gender ideology mandates imposed by the Biden administration are actions states can no longer ignore. We applaud Idaho and other states acting to shield schools‚ sports‚ and citizens from a radical gender agenda harming women and children.Originally published at WashingtonStand.comThe post Idaho Governor Signs Bills Defining Male and Female‚ Barring Pronoun Mandates appeared first on The Daily Signal.

After a key House committee advanced legislation this week to require a citizenship question on the U.S. Census‚ support for the measure could be growing in the backdrop of the border crisis and its potential impact on congressional reapportionment.Heritage Action‚ a policy advocacy arm of The Heritage Foundation‚ announced Friday the Equal Representation Act would be scored as a key vote. The bill is S 3659 in the Senate and HR 7109 in the House. (The Daily Signal is the news outlet of The Heritage Foundation.)Under current law‚ foreign citizens living in the United States are counted in the Census‚ and thus toward congressional apportionment. Rep. Yvette Clarke‚ D-N.Y.‚ publicly admitted‚ We have a diaspora that can absorb a significant number of these migrants. I need more people in my district just for redistricting purposes.Democrat Congresswoman Yvette Clarke on illegal immigrants in America:";I need more people in my district just for redistricting purposes."; The end game: Dems are willing to destroy what it means to be an American citizen to help themselves politically. pic.twitter.com/3XmBDqYEsH Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) January 9‚ 2024Joe Bidens deadly border policies have made the illegal immigration crisis the number one concern of the American people‚ and voters are pleading for Congress to fight back‚ Heritage Action Executive Vice President Ryan Walker said in a statement.The House version has 100 co-sponsors and was approved by the House Committee on Oversight and Accountability.After being in all but one census from 1820 to 2000‚ the Census citizenship question was abandoned in the 2010 questionnaire during the Obama administration.?PASSED?We just passed this commonsense bill through our committee.Unsurprisingly‚ every Oversight Democrat voted against it.On to the floor! https://t.co/DztcpKaBZN Oversight Committee (@GOPoversight) April 10‚ 2024Congressional apportionment and electoral votes should be based solely on the needs of American citizens. Heritage Action is proud to have helped push this bill past the 100 cosponsor mark and will keep working with conservatives across the country to finish the job‚ Walker said.The Heritage Action announcement comes the same day House Speaker Mike Johnson was set to join former President Donald Trump for a press conference on election integrity Friday‚ The Hill reported.Reps. Chuck Edwards‚ R-N.C.‚ and Warren Davidson‚ R-Ohio‚ introduced the House version and Sen. Bill Hagerty‚ R-Tenn.‚ introduced the Senate version. The goal is to protect Americans electoral power and congressional representation.Members of Congress represent U.S. citizens‚ not foreigners‚ Davidson said in a statement. Under the Democrats open border policies‚ sanctuary cities and states inflate their population with illegal aliens. Then theyre rewarded with more congressional representation by a Census that counts illegals. The inflated count is then used to draw congressional maps‚ undermining fair representation for our citizens.Edwards stressed only American citizens can legally vote‚ so only American citizens should be counted when determining federal representation.In the 2008 Supreme Court case District of Columbia v. Heller‚ the justices defined the people to mean all members of the political community. To be a member of a political community‚ you must be an eligible voter‚ Edwards said in a statement. The Equal Representation Act addresses one of the many consequences of our open borderillegal immigrant influence in Americas electoral process. America is waking up to this insidious threat to our democracy.The post This Bill Would Prevent Illegal Immigrants From Swaying Congressional Representation appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Neuroscientists interested in teaching at Tulane University in Louisiana must be board-certified or eligible to apply for a medical license as well as skilled in neurocritical care. All are standard requirements for a postsecondary position.But read the fine print: Applicants also have to commit to Tulanes statement on diversity‚ equity‚ and inclusion‚ or DEI‚ which has nothing to do with training better doctors or instructors.This also appears to be a standard requirement today in higher education.According to a new report that surveyed nearly 250 colleges‚ the free speech advocacy organization SpeechFirst found that 67% of colleges require students to take courses in DEI to complete general education requirements. This finding is consistent with other research‚ including from the Goldwater Institute and the Reason Foundation.Louisiana state legislators have noticed. Lawmakers have introduced a proposal that would defund DEI offices in public colleges and universities; prohibit schools from requiring job applicants to complete DEI loyalty oaths as a condition of applying for jobs or students to write such statements as a part of applying to attend a college in the state; and block employees from compelling students to say things they dont believe.That would be a welcome change in Louisianas public university system. As a private school‚ Tulane serves as an example of how DEI is advancing racism in private institutions‚ but lawmakers should focus their authority on taxpayer-funded state colleges.DEI programs do more to promote exclusivity than belonging. In 2022‚ Louisiana State Universitys Office of Multicultural Affairs hosted a graduation event for students from minority ethnicities. The announcement made no mention of students who didnt identify as Latinx/Hispanic/Latin American‚ Native American‚ Asian/Asian American &;amp; Pacific Islander.Likewise‚ LSUs Emergency Medicine Program hosts regular meetings for faculty and resident BIPOC [black‚ indigenous‚ people of color] and allies on the subjects of microaggressions‚ ally-ship‚ implicit bias‚ explicit bias‚ and morea hit parade of identity politics.University faculty and students have a right to gather‚ discuss issues‚ and advocate their beliefs‚ but under the guise of DEI‚ these programs use identity politics and categorize people based on race or ethnicity instead of character and behavior. At public colleges and universities‚ taxpayers are paying for discriminatory activities.Over the past 18 months‚ state lawmakers around the country have prohibited the use of taxpayers money on DEI offices. Lawmakers in nearly a dozen more states are considering proposals this year to end DEI and racial preferences in college programs.State officials have recognized that DEI offices dont secure civil rights but rather act as bureaucracies that impress racial favoritism in university or business operations. Idahos new law‚ adopted at the end of March‚ directly rebukes the use of racial preferences in hiring and admissions and says that any such decisions at state universities shall be made on merit.Smart move. The research on DEI activities is clear: DEI doesnt change individual attitudes or behavior and can produce resentment in those required to participate. And DEI activists such as Ibram X. Kendi have criticized federal civil rights laws‚ saying these laws spurred racist progress.In DEI parlance‚ antiracism means discrimination‚ equity means partisanship‚ and belonging means look like me and talk like mecasting doubt on any claims that DEI is trying to preserve civil rights.LSU officials recently renamed the schools Division of Inclusion‚ Civil Rights‚ and Title IX as the Division of Engagement‚ Civil Rights‚ and Title IX‚ steering away from the third term (inclusion) in the DEI moniker. But students‚ taxpayers‚ and state lawmakers shouldnt be satisfied with this decision as evidence that the school is abolishing DEIs racist activities.The LSU faculty senate‚ which advises the president and board of directors‚ has a DEI committee. The College of Humanities and Social Sciences also has a DEI committee. Diversity‚ equity‚ and inclusion doctrine is undeniably still a part of the campus culture.Offices in charge of diversity‚ equity‚ and inclusion dont make campuses more diverse‚ nor do they create healthy workplaces or classrooms. Louisiana lawmakers should protect civil rights‚ remove DEI offices‚ and teach students the value of earning successnot the unmerited benefits of preferential treatment.The post Lawmakers Must Protect Civil Rights as Louisiana Universities Hold Fast to Discrimination via DEI appeared first on The Daily Signal.

If you';re tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net.Rumble‚ the growing video-sharing platform known for its commitment to free speech and minimal moderation‚ has announced the rollout of a new recommendation algorithm aimed at enhancing user engagement and supporting content creators. This feature marks a significant step in Rumbles ongoing expansion and commitment to helping creators grow and be discovered.Rumble has rapidly grown as a favored alternative among users seeking a platform with fewer speech restrictions on content. It has gained particular popularity among independent creators and those seeking diverse viewpoints. The platform has made headlines for its user-friendly policies and robust growth‚ attracting a wide array of content ranging from personal vlogs to in-depth political discussions.The newly introduced recommendation algorithm is designed to refine how viewers discover videos‚ making it easier for users to find content that aligns with their interests. This feature not only promises to improve user satisfaction by curating a more personalized viewing experience but also aims to increase visibility for creators‚ leading to greater viewer engagement and revenue opportunities.The deployment of the algorithm will occur in phases‚ beginning with a select group of users to refine the system based on real-world feedback before a broader rollout. This gradual implementation strategy underscores Rumbles commitment to maintaining platform stability and user satisfaction as it introduces significant technological enhancements so that it can better compete with tech giants.The post Rumble Enhances User Experience with New Recommendation Algorithm: A Move to Boost Creator Visibility and Platform Engagement appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

If you';re tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net.The US Motion Picture Association (MPA)‚ a trade association representing half a dozen huge film and TV studios‚ is gearing up for a big campaign to get lawmakers to pass legislation that would force ISPs to block sites yet another way the industry hopes to fight its long war on piracy.Association CEO Charles Rivkin revealed that this essentially lobbying effort of working with Congress members has the goal of mandating that internet providers must block sites accused of piracy.Addressing the CinemaCon in Las Vegas‚ which gathers owners of movie theaters‚ Rivkin stated that the next major phase in what he said was an evolving danger of piracy is MPA working with members of Congress to enact judicial site-blocking legislation here in the United States.Not so fast‚ says the digital rights group Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF). Their key argument: it isnt up to MPA to decide who is and isnt protected by the First Amendment.According to EFF‚ this is an example (and by no means the only one) of countries like the US effectively trying to catch up with those they criticize the most‚ like Russia and China. In this case‚ the push aims to legalize blocking websites accused of piracy at the ISP level.And that‚ the group notes‚ is very different from issuing copyright infringement notices for specific content‚ which is a tool already available to the industry and doesnt even require court approval.Here‚ whole sites would be taken offline‚ making this power a new potent form of censorship the keys of the internet would be given to MPA‚ as EFF put it. The idea was contained in the extremely controversial SOPA/PIPA laws and included not only ISPs but other low‚ fundamental levels of internet infrastructure like domain name registers and registrars‚ and more.Completely by no coincidence‚ MPA was one of the major supporters of these laws‚ proposed over a decade ago. But even though the association signaled in the meanwhile it was abandoning this idea‚ in reality‚ lobbying in Washington continued‚ EFF said. And now‚ MRAa Rivkin came out in the open with plans to push legislators to adopt a new law.Site-blocking legislation‚ whether called SOPA/PIPA‚ no fault injunctions‚ or by any other name‚ still threatens the free expression of all of citizens and creators‚ the digital rights group said.The post Movie Industrys Push for ISP Site-Blocking Legislation Sparks Controversy Over Internet Censorship appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

Finally‚ the Alphabet People Break Their Silence!

Of Course‚ DNC Has Quietly Been Paying Biden';s Legal Fees