YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #satire #faith #libtards #racism #crime
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Day mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

SciFi and Fantasy
SciFi and Fantasy  
1 y

Flashback Takes the Wheel in The Acolyte’s “Destiny”
Favicon 
reactormag.com

Flashback Takes the Wheel in The Acolyte’s “Destiny”

Movies & TV Star Wars: The Acolyte Flashback Takes the Wheel in The Acolyte’s “Destiny” A full episode flashback, to get us all up to speed about that fire… By Emmet Asher-Perrin | Published on June 12, 2024 Image: Disney+ Comment 0 Share New Share Image: Disney+ The power of one, the power of two, the power of many… Recap Osha (Lauren Brady) is hiding under a beautiful willow as a child on the planet Brendok, when Mae (Leah Brady) comes to find her. They are both about to complete the “Ascension” ceremony of their people. Mae is excited, but Osha is not, and resents being forced to do everything the same as Mae. They are found by Mother Koril (Margarita Levieva), who reprimands them for going outside the walls; she worries they will be found. Hidden behind a tree, Sol sees the girls. The girls are brought back to the safety of a fortress where their coven resides, and are greeted by Mother Aniseya (Jodie Turner-Smith), who wants them to attend their lessons later. Aniseya talks with Koril, who believes she’s too lenient with the girls, as they are not ordinary children. At their lessons, Aniseya teaches the girls about the Force, though their people do not call it that—they think of it as a thread that weaves the universe together. The girls bicker during the lesson, prompting Aniseya to do a demonstration against them, but only Mae fights back, earning praise. Later on, the girls are still fighting about their future, but Aniseya has them hold hands to remind them of their bond. She wants them to stay in the coven to keep them safe. As the girls get their hair done for the ceremony, they argue agains, with Osha desperate to have Mae understand that she doesn’t want to share everything with her sister, that they are different people. At the Ascension ceremony, the girls are brought forward and asked to vow their lives in service of the coven, to protect its way from this day forward. Mae makes her vow, but before Osha’s can be complete, word arrives that there are Jedi at their fortress. The girls hide behind the women of the coven as Indara, Sol, Torbin and Kalnecca appear. Indara claims that they believed this world to be uninhabited, and that they were concerned to find that the women here seem to be training children. Osha reveals herself to the Jedi by peeking out from behind the women and Sol calls to her, showing her his lightsaber and asking if she’d like to become a Jedi. Aniseya takes over Torbin’s body and commands the Jedi to leave, but Osha wants to take the Jedi test. Aniseya agrees, and Sol insists that it must be both girls. Later, the coven argues about what to do, because they know that if the girls pass the test, they will be taken away to become Jedi. Aniseya instructs both girls to lie on their test, but Osha doesn’t want to, prompting the girls to fight again. They bring the girls to the Jedi camp the next morning. Mae takes her test and lies, as she’s instructed, but Sol is ready for Osha. He keeps telling her that she’s getting answers right, to prompt her to admit she knows it’s wrong because she’s lying. He asks her what she truly wants, and also tells her about his own recruitment, and that the Jedi Temple is full of other children like her—she will no longer be alone. Osha passes the test, and Mae is furious with her for it. The coven knows they’ll have to decide what to do about this, if they want to fight the Jedi to keep her. Aniseya talks to Osha, who tells her mother that she’s certain she wants to be a Jedi. She promises to take her daughter’s desires into account as she talks with the other witches. Osha packs to leave, and Mae comes in, adamant that she won’t allow it. She steals Osha’s notebook and sets it on fire outside her door. Osha goes to a ventilation shaft in the wall to escape as the fire suddenly blooms and rages out of control. She escapes into a back corridors and finds the fortress falling apart around her. Sol finds her and Mae, and attempts to save them both, but Mae falls into a chasm. Sol grabs hold of Osha and speeds her out of the fortress, past all the bodies of her dead coven, Aniseya included. Osha wakes on a Jedi ship and Sol tells her what happened. He promises that she will train to become a Jedi as his Padawan, and that she will never feel like this again. Commentary Can someone tell me why we seem to be moving into the realm of entire flashback episodes, rather than seeding flashback throughout a story? Because it’s one of my least favorite things. It’s bad for momentum! Also, you’ve just introduced us to all these characters and then you immediately take half of them away from us for a whole week. There’s a lot of fascinating stuff going on here, but it’s weird to just have the whole backstory dumped in one go, without so much as a lead-up scene. There are two primary things at war here, it seems: bad governance and bad parenting. Do I absolutely love that we now have confirmation of lesbians being able to make themselves kids if they’re Force-wielders? Oh, I do. I love it so much. This is my favorite thing. Between this and the recent reveal of Mystique being Nightcrawler’s dad in the X-Men comics, it’s been a big win for queer sci-fi families of late. A lot of information is being omitted here, which is realistic and frustrating at the same time, so I’ll be making assumptions in a few places. But one of my favorite aspects to this episode is watching characters make choices that are right and wrong at once. It’s understandable that this coven is protective of itself because according to what we’re seeing here, the Jedi are proprietary over the Force within the boundaries of the Republic. This is bananas, but does explain a few things that have long been assumed, namely that the conceit that certain species are less Force-attuned—as evidenced by fewer of them being Jedi—is probably bullshit. Oh, Wookiees don’t become Jedi that regularly? Mandalorians don’t either? That’s totally because they’re less connected to the Force and not at all because their people are hiding the kids away every time the recruitment office shows up. Incredible how the Jedi just accept that, rather than question why so many cultures aren’t too keen to have their kids taken away. And I feel the need to point out that this is common occurrence here—between the Jedi, the Sith and the First Order, child-theft is kind of a given in this universe. A piece of the deeper conflict here is bound up in bad parenting choices, however—namely the insistence of framing Osha and Mae as halves of a whole rather than separate people. The coven’s understanding of the Force unfortunately plays into that, as the belief of interconnectivity reinforces the idea that the twins should not want to be separate. Psychologically, however, you’re really not supposed to do that to children, particularly not to identical twins: Much study has been put into the relationships between twins, and while closeness is a constant factor, the difficulty in asserting one’s individuality can become stressful for the child. Osha is blatantly unhappy with this part of her life and desperately yearns to be her own person. So we’ve got a deep conflict running through the center of this tragedy—the struggle between the unified whole and the individual. But what’s great about this struggle is that we’re seeing it flipped from its usual status; in Star Wars, the Sith are framed as selfish opportunists, while the Jedi are harmonious connectors. With Osha and Mae we’re seeing the reverse: Mae’s desire to jealously guard the connection with her sister contains whispers of the dark side. Her desire for that unity (with her sister and the coven) and pain at losing it has put her on a path of murder and rage. I hope they keep playing with this because discussions around the Force can become aggravatingly binary in terms of what is good and evil. Being more flexible in their definitions pulls the Force further away from a more Christian-aligned morality. Sol continues to be a gorgeous character in every respect, but particularly in his tenderness and in his mistakes. Certain Jedi are far more “parent forward” in the way they train Padawans, and his desire to train Osha the moment he sees her is fully paternal, but I want to understand it better: Is this impulse new for him? Has he ever trained anyone before, or wanted to? But he is also busy making parenting mistakes, right from the jump. His instinct to comfort Osha on waking has him assuring her that he’ll take her on as his Padawan (which he shouldn’t be able to guarantee), and then swearing that she’ll never feel this way again. Buddy, you absolutely cannot promise that. And as a Jedi, you shouldn’t even want to—it is antithetical to how your whole philosophical deal works! Too bad. Dad-mode too strong. This will not come back to haunt them both at all, and definitely hasn’t already. There’s plenty of good parenting in this episode too, which deserves acknowledgement as well, of course. Aniseya may be pushing those girls harder than they need right now, but she believes in their autonomy, loves them openly and fiercely, and acknowledges the importance of change in their growth. She still hopes that her lessons will convince Osha to agree with her, but the point that our desires often shift throughout our lives is an important one to internalize. And, of course, Osha cannot know that she’s asking to trade her family for an organization that isn’t truly much more allowing for the individuality she craves. Importantly, too, we know Mae didn’t set that entire place on fire: It spread much too quickly; we never see the key moment it begins to fan out from her perspective; and the coven deaths were curiously unexplained. So something else happened, and we’re in the dark so far as to how it transpired. Spanners and Sabers Image: Disney+ Mother Koril is a Zabrak, the same species as Darth Maul. I don’t think that a female Zabrak has ever been shown with the cranial horns, though? So that’s pretty cool. Kelnacca’s topknot action is sending me. It’s so much harder to maintain that as a choice if you’re covered in fur. There’s an argument here about whether or not Brendok is a part of the Republic, so… did they annex it? Is it just close enough to the border that they figured it was no big deal? Are they outside of their jurisdiction with a purpose? Indara said they thought the world was uninhabited, which could be a lie, but if not, why did they come here? Next week! Back with the crew, I assume! [end-mark] The post Flashback Takes the Wheel in <i>The Acolyte’</i>s “Destiny” appeared first on Reactor.
Like
Comment
Share
SciFi and Fantasy
SciFi and Fantasy  
1 y

Paddington in Peru Trailer Asks Where the Fudge is Aunt Lucy?
Favicon 
reactormag.com

Paddington in Peru Trailer Asks Where the Fudge is Aunt Lucy?

News Paddington in Peru Paddington in Peru Trailer Asks Where the Fudge is Aunt Lucy? Someone alert Javi Gutierrez By Vanessa Armstrong | Published on June 12, 2024 Screenshot: StudiocanalUK Comment 0 Share New Share Screenshot: StudiocanalUK We finally have a trailer for the third Paddington film! This one sees everyone’s favorite bear with a deep love for marmalade heading home to Peru to visit his dear Aunt Lucy. The trailer lays out the premise, which you can also see summarized in the official synopsis below: Paddington in Peru brings Paddington’s story to Peru as he returns to visit his beloved Aunt Lucy, who now resides at the Home for Retired Bears. With the Brown Family in tow, a thrilling adventure ensues when a mystery plunges them into an unexpected journey through the Amazon rainforest and up to the mountain peaks of Peru. After the newly released trailer sees Paddington struggling to get the perfect passport photo (something that will be relatable to anyone who has gotten a similar document), we see the bear, voiced as always by Ben Whishaw, traveling with the Browns and meeting an overeager nun (played by Olivia Colman) and a handsome boatman (Antonio Banderas) as they go to find Aunt Lucy. It looks like another heartfelt adventure, though the bar is high given that Paddington 2 is one of the best movies ever made. This latest installment will see the return of Hugh Bonneville, Julie Walters, Jim Broadbent, Madeleine Harris and Samuel Joslin. Paul King, who directed Paddington 2, left the third film and was replaced by Dougal Wilson, though King still co-wrote the story. Emily Mortimer is also new to Paddington-dom, and is taking over the role of Mrs. Brown from Sally Hawkins. Paddington in Peru premieres in U.S. theaters on January 17, 2025. Check out the trailer below. [end-mark] The post <i>Paddington in Peru</i> Trailer Asks Where the Fudge is Aunt Lucy? appeared first on Reactor.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
1 y

Two Groups Accuse Americans of Being Enemies of Ukraine. A House Republican Wants State to Stop Working With Them.
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Two Groups Accuse Americans of Being Enemies of Ukraine. A House Republican Wants State to Stop Working With Them.

Rep. Jim Banks, R-Ind., is urging Congress to prevent the State Department from working with foreign organizations that “encourage the harassment of Americans” after a Ukraine-based outlet listed U.S. organizations and individuals it accused of impeding assistance to Ukraine.  The Heritage Foundation, which founded The Daily Signal in 2014, appears among the organizations on the list, and so does its president, Kevin D. Roberts.  The Ukraine-based media outlet the DATA Journalism Agency, also known as TEXTY, published a report titled “Roller Coaster: From Trumpists to Communists.” The report lists forces in the U.S. impeding aid to Ukraine and how they do it. The list includes 77 organizations and 388 individuals, including former President Donald Trump and 116 Republican House members. Two State Department agencies partnered with the DATA Journalism Agency, the Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs and the U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID.  “According to the report, the individuals on the list ‘oppose supporting Ukraine,’ and many ‘echo key messages of Russian propaganda aimed at depriving Ukrainians of the ability to defend themselves,’” Banks said in a letter Tuesday. He sent the letter to House Appropriations Committee Chairman Tom Cole, R-Okla., and Appropriations Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations, and Related Programs Chair Mario Diaz-Balart, R-Fla. Banks added that another Ukrainian organization partnering with the State Department, known as Myrotvorets, also maintained a database of alleged enemies of Ukraine.  “Federal bureaucrats should not support or partner with foreign groups that attempt to intimidate and silence U.S. citizens and lawmakers,” Banks wrote. “I am urging the Appropriations Committee majority to support efforts in the Fiscal Year 2025 SFOPS bill to force the State Department and USAID to end all relations with foreign NGOs like TEXTY that seek to silence the speech of Americans they dislike and to sway U.S. policymakers to serve their own interests.”  Banks also wrote to Roberts Tuesday as well as other individuals and entities that were on the list. “The Appropriations Committee’s markup of its bill to fund the State Department and USAID during Fiscal Year 2025 is scheduled to take place tomorrow,” Banks added. The post Two Groups Accuse Americans of Being Enemies of Ukraine. A House Republican Wants State to Stop Working With Them. appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
1 y

Heritage Action Backs Bill to Eliminate Federal DEI Initiatives
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Heritage Action Backs Bill to Eliminate Federal DEI Initiatives

A leading conservative grassroots organization is putting its weight behind new legislation introduced Wednesday to eliminate all federal diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs and funding for them. Heritage Action for America issued a key vote urging lawmakers to cosponsor the Dismantle DEI Act, a bill championed by Sen. J.D. Vance, R-Ohio, and Rep. Michael Cloud, R-Texas. At least 20 other members of Congress have already signed on as cosponsors. “Contrary to President [Joe] Biden’s claims, DEI policies have nothing to do with equity or inclusion, and instead perpetuate the very discrimination and division the Left claims to be fighting,” Ryan Walker, executive vice president of Heritage Action, told The Daily Signal. “The American people have had enough of the political spin and DEI indoctrination that has made our country weaker and more divided than ever.” The legislation covers federal agencies, any contractors who receive federal funding, organizations that obtain federal grants, and educational accreditation entities. It requires the government’s personnel office to eliminate DEI policies and procedures, and affords an individual the right to sue. By urging members of Congress to support the bill, Heritage Action is attempting to build on its success with other legislative measures, including the recently passed Equal Representation Act. Following its decision to key vote cosponsorship of that bill, more than 135 lawmakers in both the House and Senate joined as supporters. Vance promised to “root out DEI” from the federal government by eliminating programs and cutting off funding. “The DEI agenda is a destructive ideology that breeds hatred and racial division,” he said in a statement. “It has no place in our federal government or anywhere else in our society.” DEI is racism, plain and simple. It’s time to outlaw it nationwide, starting with the federal government. https://t.co/IRog7RqONk— J.D. Vance (@JDVance1) June 12, 2024 Cloud specifically cited examples of the Biden administration’s embrace of DEI as a reason for acting now: The Food and Drug Administration’s guidance in 2022 prompted some states to ration COVID-19 treatments based on race. The Defense Department authorized a $2 million contract for DEI programming and consulting at schools run by the military. “This bill is a necessary step to restore merit and equality, not equity, in America’s government institutions, and eliminate the DEI bureaucracy that sows division and wastes taxpayer money,” Cloud said. “It’s absurd to fund these divisive policies, especially using Americans’ tax dollars, and it’s time for Congress to put an end to them once and for all.” Dismantle-DEI-ActDownload Following the race riots in 2020, conservatives began sounding the alarm on the government’s role promoting DEI. In September 2020, then-President Donald Trump issued an executive order calling it a “destructive ideology.” Trump banned race and sex stereotyping and prohibited federal grants. Biden immediately reversed Trump’s order on his first day in office on Jan. 20, 2021. Other cosponsors of the bill include Sens. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn.; Rick Scott, R-Fla., Kevin Cramer, R-N.D.; Bill Cassidy, R-La.; and Eric Schmitt, R-Mo.; along with Reps. Troy Nehls, R-Texas; Claudia Tenney, R-N.Y.; Debbie Lesko, R-Ariz.; Diana Harshbarger, R-Tenn.; Barry Moore, R-Ala.; Andy Ogles, R-Tenn.; Mary Miller, R-Ill.; Randy Weber, R-Texas; Keith Self, R-Texas; Alex Mooney, R-W.Va.; Andy Biggs, R-Ariz.; Clay Higgins, R-La.; Rudy Yakym, R-Ind.; Mike Collins, R-Ga.; Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla. The Washington Free Beacon first reported the news of the Dismantle DEI Act. Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, is sponsoring the Dismantle DEI Act. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images) The post Heritage Action Backs Bill to Eliminate Federal DEI Initiatives appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
1 y

Dismantling DEI = Restoring Equal Protection of Law
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Dismantling DEI = Restoring Equal Protection of Law

Rep. Michael Cloud, R-Texas, and Sen. J.D. Vance, R-Ohio, have introduced the Dismantle DEI Act. The bill, S. 4516, is a necessary and important bill that would largely put an end to the racist policies being implemented throughout the federal government by the Biden administration under the rubric of diversity, equity, and inclusion. DEI policies are typically overtly racist and sexist in that they mandate that government or businesses establish quotas or discriminate based on sex, skin color, ethnicity, or sexual orientation. DEI defines diversity entirely in terms of immutable characteristics, such as race, ethnicity, or sex instead of the myriad other kinds of diversity, such as achievement, expertise, experience, approach to business or business philosophy, educational background, socioeconomic background, ethical or political views, integrity, geographic location, and so on. Morally, DEI represents a marked step backward. It is rejection of the principle that people should be judged on the content of their character and their individual achievement, rather than their sex, race, national origin, ethnicity, or sexual orientation. It’s a rejection of the principle that people should be judged as individuals rather than as members of a racial or sexual group. It’s also a rejection of the principle of equal protection under the law and a rejection of the principle that we are all created equal. Discrimination or quotas on the basis of race, ethnicity, or sex should be a relic of the past. Most Americans agree. Because racism has become so widespread in the federal government, the 48-page Dismantle DEI Act necessarily contains many provisions. First, the bill defines a ‘prohibited diversity, equity, or inclusion practice’ to mean: discriminating for or against any person on the basis of race, color, ethnicity, religion, biological sex, or national origin; or requiring as a condition of employment, promotion, advancement, speaking, making a presentation, or submitting written materials that an employee (a) undergo training, education, or coursework that asserts that a particular race, color, ethnicity, religion, biological sex, or national origin is inherently or systemically superior or inferior, oppressive or oppressed, or privileged or unprivileged or (b) sign or assent to a statement, code of conduct, work program, or plan that requires assent by the employee that a particular race, color, ethnicity, religion, biological sex, or national origin is inherently or systemically superior or inferior, oppressive or oppressed, or privileged or unprivileged. The federal government, including federal advisory committees, would be prohibited from engaging in prohibited DEI practices. A private cause of action would be created so that private litigants can sue to enforce these requirements. Various statutory DEI-oriented offices and chief diversity officers would be eliminated. The bill would rescind six of President Joe Biden’s executive orders and two Biden administration national security memorandums implementing racist DEI policies. Rep. Michael Cloud, R-Texas—seen here walking down the steps of the U.S. Capitol on June 5—is the House sponsor of the bicameral Dismantle DEI Act. (Photo: Bill Clark/CQ-Roll Call/Getty Images) The Cloud-Vance bill would also require the Office of Personnel Management and the Office of Management and Budget to revise all regulations, policies, procedures, manuals, circulars, courses, training, and guidance to comply with the act. It would require the closure of all DEI or similar offices throughout the federal government and would abolish the Chief Diversity Officers Executive Council. It would prohibit a wide range of DEI actions and personnel practices by federal officials and prohibit the use of DEI factors in the federal performance appraisal process. Federal contractors and grant recipients would be prohibited from using federal funds to engage in prohibited DEI practices. Most federal contracts would be required to contain a provision specifying that no part of the services performed under the contract can be performed in buildings or surroundings, under working conditions or in a working environment, provided by or under the control or supervision of a contractor or any subcontractor who is subject to, or required to comply with, a prohibited diversity, equity, or inclusion practice. Education accreditation organizations would be prohibited from requiring or coercing any institution of higher education to engage in prohibited diversity, equity, and inclusion practices. Financial regulators, including so-called self-regulatory organizations, would be barred from engaging in prohibited [PP1] DEI practices or requiring that regulated entities or members do so. The Dismantle DEI Act would go a long way toward eliminating the pervasive racism that has taken hold of the federal government and restoring equal protection of the law. The post Dismantling DEI = Restoring Equal Protection of Law appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Reclaim The Net Feed
Reclaim The Net Feed
1 y

Meta to Censor “Hate Speech” Ahead of Euro 2024 and Olympics, Highlighting $20B Censorship Investments
Favicon 
reclaimthenet.org

Meta to Censor “Hate Speech” Ahead of Euro 2024 and Olympics, Highlighting $20B Censorship Investments

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Various elections are not the only thing Big Tech is “protecting” this summer: athletes competing in major sporting events are another. Meta has announced that the “protection measures” that are to affect its apps (Facebook, Instagram, and, Threads) will also extend to the fans. Regardless of the way Meta phrases it, the objective is clearly to censor what the giant decides is abusive behavior, bullying, and hate speech. The events that draw Meta’s particular attention are the European football championship (EURO 2024), and the Olympic and Paralympic Games. To prove how serious it is about implementing censorship in general, the company revealed an investment exceeding $20 billion that went into the “safety and security” segment (often resulting in unrestrained stifling of speech and deplatforming.) Coincidentally or not, this investment began in 2016, and since then, what Meta calls its safety and security team went up to 40,000 members, with 15,000 used as “content reviewers.” Before explaining how it’s going to “keep athletes and fans safe,” Meta also summed up the result of this spending and activities: 95% of whatever was deemed to be “hate speech” and similar has been censored before it even got reported, whereas some component of AI was used to automate issuing warnings to users that their comments “might be offensive.” Now, Meta says that users will be allowed to turn off DM requests on Instagram, isolating themselves in this way from anyone they don’t follow. This is supposed to “protect” athletes presumably from unhappy fans, and there’s also “Hidden Words.” “When turned on, this feature automatically sends DM requests — including Story replies — containing offensive words, phrases and emojis to a hidden folder so you don’t have to see them,” the blog post explained, adding, “It also hides comments with these terms under your posts.” This is just one of the features on Facebook and Instagram that effectively allows people to use these platforms for influence and/or monetary gain, but without interacting with anyone they don’t follow, including indirectly via comments (that will be censored, aka, “moderated”). Meta is not only out to “protect athletes,” but “educate” other users, this time on how to display “supportive behavior.” It doesn’t bode well that notoriously error-prone algorithms (AI) seem to have been given a key role in detecting “abusive” or “offensive” comments and then warning people they “may be breaking our rules.” But this “training of users” works, according to Meta, that shared testing of what they refer to as interventions showed that “people edited or deleted their comment 50% of the time after seeing these warnings.” If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post Meta to Censor “Hate Speech” Ahead of Euro 2024 and Olympics, Highlighting $20B Censorship Investments appeared first on Reclaim The Net.
Like
Comment
Share
Reclaim The Net Feed
Reclaim The Net Feed
1 y

New York Rolls Out Digital IDs Following New Online Digital ID Law
Favicon 
reclaimthenet.org

New York Rolls Out Digital IDs Following New Online Digital ID Law

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. It’s surely just a coincidence that New York has passed its online digital ID law, just as the state has joined the ranks of states adopting mobile ID technology, enabling residents to convert their traditional driver’s licenses or non-driver IDs into digital formats. As of this week, New Yorkers can download the New Longyear Mobile ID app from both the Apple App Store and Google Play. This digital version allows users to verify their identity at airports and other locations requiring ID. To set up their mobile ID, users must initially scan both sides of their existing physical ID card using their smartphone. The launch was unveiled at a media event at LaGuardia Airport, where Robert Duffy, the federal security director for the Transportation Security Administration, and other officials were present. During the briefing, it was stated that the introduction of mobile IDs is a significant step towards modernizing identity security and airport screening processes. Officials highlighted the optional nature of the digital IDs, noting they offer greater convenience without being mandatory. Related: California Approves Online Digital ID Rules for Social Media Use Currently, there is no mandatory requirement for businesses or law enforcement to accept mobile IDs, and acceptance is entirely voluntary. Businesses, including bars, may begin accepting mobile IDs immediately, provided they install a state-sanctioned verifier application. According to a press release from Governor Kathy Hochul’s office, the New York Mobile ID app is operational in nearly 30 airports nationwide, including all terminals at LaGuardia and John F. Kennedy airports. New York is now among a growing list of states such as Arizona, Colorado, and Utah that have embraced mobile driver’s licenses. The shift to mobile IDs aligns with the broader trend of smartphones becoming digital wallets, capable of storing not just credit cards and IDs, but even car keys. However, this shift raises significant privacy issues. Digital IDs can be tracked more easily than physical cards, potentially exposing detailed information about individuals’ movements and activities. There are concerns about how securely this data is stored, especially when managed by third-party vendors. One major issue is the potential for increased surveillance. Digital IDs can be tracked more easily than physical cards, leading to the possibility of detailed tracking of individuals’ movements and activities. This capability poses a threat to personal privacy, as it could enable both governmental and non-governmental entities to collect and analyze vast amounts of personal data without explicit consent. Furthermore, the security of the data stored in digital IDs is a pressing concern. With third-party vendors often involved in managing these digital identities, the risk of data breaches or misuse increases. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post New York Rolls Out Digital IDs Following New Online Digital ID Law appeared first on Reclaim The Net.
Like
Comment
Share
Survival Prepper
Survival Prepper  
1 y

How to Be a Producer in a Nation of Consumers
Favicon 
preppersdailynews.com

How to Be a Producer in a Nation of Consumers

How to Be a Producer in a Nation of Consumers
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
1 y

The Media Struggles to Accept They Got the Hunter Biden Laptop Wrong
Favicon 
hotair.com

The Media Struggles to Accept They Got the Hunter Biden Laptop Wrong

The Media Struggles to Accept They Got the Hunter Biden Laptop Wrong
Like
Comment
Share
Science Explorer
Science Explorer
1 y

27 Marine Species Discovered To Glow, From Octopus To Boxer Crabs
Favicon 
www.iflscience.com

27 Marine Species Discovered To Glow, From Octopus To Boxer Crabs

Many species in the natural world have a certain little something that goes beyond the striking patterns visible on their fur and feathers. From fungi to wombats, many species have been found to be fluorescent – and now a whole range of glowing sea creatures from the Banda Sea in Indonesia and the Red Sea in Egypt are joining the party. The team behind the discovery have not been slacking by any means, and have described fluorescence in 27 species where it was not known to occur previously. These species include nudibranchs, sponges, fish and even octopuses across the phylums of Porifera, Mollusca, Arthropoda, Annelida, and Chordata. The team dove in both the Banda Sea and in the Red Sea in between February 2019 and September 2022. The team took photographs of the species with Leica THUNDER microscopy, and the images were used to learn more about the presence of fluorescence within the different body parts of the animals. The species from the Polyplacophora or chitons were found to have bright green, yellow, and red fluorescenceImage Credit: Poding, L.H., et al PLOS ONE (2024) CC BY 4.0Among the glowing species include Lybia tessellata, a smaller species of boxer crab; Corythoichthys intestinalis a species of snake pipefish; and six species of stony corals. Some species exhibited fluorescence in only certain body parts, such as the scarlet frogfish (Antennatus coccineus) which possessed green fluorescence all over its body, but orange fluorescence only in patches and in the lures. The team also described fluorescence in the order Octopoda for the first time in the species Abdopus aculeatus, and in the order Acifiacea, which are the sea squirts. For the nudibranchs, previously thought to only acquire fluorescence because of ingesting a glowing food source, the team found cases where the little gastropods were glowing all on their own. The team think that searching marine diversity hotspots with UV lights could even reveal more glowing species in the future. The paper is published in the journal PLOS ONE
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 60576 out of 90926
  • 60572
  • 60573
  • 60574
  • 60575
  • 60576
  • 60577
  • 60578
  • 60579
  • 60580
  • 60581
  • 60582
  • 60583
  • 60584
  • 60585
  • 60586
  • 60587
  • 60588
  • 60589
  • 60590
  • 60591
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund