YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #humor #loonylibs #charliekirk #illegalaliens #tpusa #bigfoot #socialists #buy #deportthemall #blackamerica #commieleft #sell #lyinglibs #shemales #trannies
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Day mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Living In Faith
Living In Faith
1 y

How to Persevere in Obedience – Senior Living – July 4
Favicon 
www.godupdates.com

How to Persevere in Obedience – Senior Living – July 4

How to persevere in obedience "Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age." – Matthew 28:19-20 The great poet and educator, Archibald Rutledge, wrote about how he once met a man whose dog had just been killed in a forest fire. Heartbroken, the man explained to Rutledge how it happened. Because he worked outdoors, he often took his dog with him. That morning, he left the animal in a clearing and gave him a command to stay and watch his lunch bucket while he went into the forest. His faithful friend understood, and that's exactly what he did. So when a fire started in the woods and soon spread to the spot where the dog had been left, the faithful companion didn't move. He stayed right where he was, in perfect obedience to his master's word. When it comes to obedience to God, do you cower down when things heat up? Or do you, like that dog, endure faithfully, even if it means suffering, or even death? In this life, the Bible never gives us the promise of an easy path. There are times when staying true to your Master will even cause you to encounter hard times. Yet through them all, we're given the simple promise that no matter what happens, God is with us. Maybe today, you know God is asking you to follow Him in a certain way that will lead to hardship. If so, show obedience to God by following Him even if it means tough times. When you do, you can be sure that the reward you'll receive will far outweigh any inconvenience you face! Prayer Challenge Pray and tell God that you'll follow Him no matter where He calls you. Respond in faith by giving Him your life and surrendering to His will.  Visit the Senior Living Ministries website Visit the Senior Living Ministries website The post How to Persevere in Obedience – Senior Living – July 4 appeared first on GodUpdates.
Like
Comment
Share
Living In Faith
Living In Faith
1 y

A Prayer to Prepare Our Hearts to Celebrate Our Nation’s 4th of July – Your Daily Prayer – July 4
Favicon 
www.godupdates.com

A Prayer to Prepare Our Hearts to Celebrate Our Nation’s 4th of July – Your Daily Prayer – July 4

A Prayer to Prepare Our Hearts to Celebrate Our Nation's 4th of JulyBy Lynette Kittle "So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed" – John 8:36 America's 4th of July holiday is all about celebrating freedom. Although many citizens may be viewing it as a reason for an extended holiday, family gatherings, and setting off fireworks, there is much more behind this national holiday. Many Americans may not realize where the desire for freedom, the kind that stirs the hearts of men and women, originates. 2 Corinthians 3:17 explains its source, "Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom." Many believe God's way is to restrain people, but His way is freedom; as John 8:32 explains, "Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free." Humankind's longing for freedom comes from God, who provides the way for us to be free. "It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery" (Galatians 5:1). Freedom Came to AmericaSadly, some Americans have no idea how America came to be the free nation it is today. They haven't heard or learned how God divinely led Christians from across the ocean who longed to openly serve Him to leave everything behind and risk their lives to set sail for a world where they could freely worship God. In The Pilgrim Chronicles, historian Rod Gragg traces the Pilgrims’ beginnings in 1606 England as Christian separatists who faced severe persecution by the Church of England. But fleeing to Holland in 1609 brought them face-to-face with worldly Dutch ways, causing them to look beyond the Netherlands for the religious freedom they longed to find. Journeying to the New World offered them the opportunity to find the freedom to worship Jesus in peace. Because they did, the Pilgrims laid the biblical foundation and influence, leading our Founding Fathers to base our Declaration of Independence on godly principles. These truths are why we have been given the right to worship God freely and without reserve. Freedom Brings UnityBut as the New World grew, England's King George ruled with a heavy hand, oppressing the citizens and cultivating a widespread desire for them to be free from his control. His oppression led to the Revolutionary War that led to the Declaration of Independence and the creation of the United States of America. Behind this movement was the Church, consisting of Congregationalists, Anglicans, Quakers, Dutch Reformed, Baptists, Lutherans, Puritans, and Presbyterians who came together to pray, overlooking their denominational differences to unite together for a common goal. Dennis Prager, an American conservative radio talk-show host and writer, explains, "Ultimately, they wanted people to be free to practice their religion and relate to God in their own way. They all knew God is the source of liberty."  Freedom's Ultimate SacrificeAs Christians, we know freedom comes through Jesus' sacrifice. As 1 John 2:2 explains, "He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world." Likewise, sacrifice led the way for our nation's freedom, too. Retired Judge Darrell White describes, "In a nutshell, our founders sacrificed their prosperity for their posterity, us. They pledged their lives, their fortune, and their sacred honor to secure our blessings of liberty." Because Jesus laid down His life, we have been set free from sin. This foundational freedom strengthened and led the way for men and women before us to lay down their lives so that we might live in a nation founded on liberty for all. As Dr. Jerry Newcombe, Executive Director of Providence Forum, explains, "We are free in large part because others sacrificed on our behalf that we might be free." Let's Pray:  Dear Father,Today and every day, we celebrate the freedom You give us and how it laid the foundation for our nation to be free. Thank You for the freedom You give to us through Your Son, Jesus Christ. Because of You, true freedom is possible and stirs the hearts of Americans and people around the world. Let Your name be glorified in our celebrations. Help us celebrate in ways that bring You praise and honor. Remind Americans how You divinely led Christians to set sail and settle this land for Your glory. Show us, too, O Lord, how to be grateful and respectful to the men and women who came before us, sacrificing their lives and futures, braving and suffering hardship, to establish this land for Your glory so future generations could live free.In Jesus' name, amen. Photo credit: ©GettyImages/fotostorm Lynette Kittle is married with four daughters. She enjoys writing about faith, marriage, parenting, relationships, and life. Her writing has been published by Focus on the Family, Decision, Today's Christian Woman, kirkcameron.com, Ungrind.org, StartMarriageRight.com, and more. She has a M.A. in Communication from Regent University and serves as associate producer for Soul Check TV. Teach Us to Pray is a FREE prayer podcast hosted by iBelieve writer Christina Patterson. Each week, she gives you practical, real-life tips on how to grow your faith and relationship with God through the power of prayer. To listen to her episode on What to Pray in the Morning for a Worry-Free Day, click below! Now that you’ve prayed, are you in need of someone to pray for YOU? Click the button below! Visit iBelieve.com for more inspiring prayer content. The post A Prayer to Prepare Our Hearts to Celebrate Our Nation’s 4th of July – Your Daily Prayer – July 4 appeared first on GodUpdates.
Like
Comment
Share
Living In Faith
Living In Faith
1 y

A Prayer to Prepare Our Hearts to Celebrate Our Nation’s 4th of July – Your Daily Prayer – July 4
Favicon 
www.godupdates.com

A Prayer to Prepare Our Hearts to Celebrate Our Nation’s 4th of July – Your Daily Prayer – July 4

A Prayer to Prepare Our Hearts to Celebrate Our Nation's 4th of JulyBy Lynette Kittle "So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed" – John 8:36 America's 4th of July holiday is all about celebrating freedom. Although many citizens may be viewing it as a reason for an extended holiday, family gatherings, and setting off fireworks, there is much more behind this national holiday. Many Americans may not realize where the desire for freedom, the kind that stirs the hearts of men and women, originates. 2 Corinthians 3:17 explains its source, "Now the Lord is the Spirit, and where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is freedom." Many believe God's way is to restrain people, but His way is freedom; as John 8:32 explains, "Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free." Humankind's longing for freedom comes from God, who provides the way for us to be free. "It is for freedom that Christ has set us free. Stand firm, then, and do not let yourselves be burdened again by a yoke of slavery" (Galatians 5:1). Freedom Came to AmericaSadly, some Americans have no idea how America came to be the free nation it is today. They haven't heard or learned how God divinely led Christians from across the ocean who longed to openly serve Him to leave everything behind and risk their lives to set sail for a world where they could freely worship God. In The Pilgrim Chronicles, historian Rod Gragg traces the Pilgrims’ beginnings in 1606 England as Christian separatists who faced severe persecution by the Church of England. But fleeing to Holland in 1609 brought them face-to-face with worldly Dutch ways, causing them to look beyond the Netherlands for the religious freedom they longed to find. Journeying to the New World offered them the opportunity to find the freedom to worship Jesus in peace. Because they did, the Pilgrims laid the biblical foundation and influence, leading our Founding Fathers to base our Declaration of Independence on godly principles. These truths are why we have been given the right to worship God freely and without reserve. Freedom Brings UnityBut as the New World grew, England's King George ruled with a heavy hand, oppressing the citizens and cultivating a widespread desire for them to be free from his control. His oppression led to the Revolutionary War that led to the Declaration of Independence and the creation of the United States of America. Behind this movement was the Church, consisting of Congregationalists, Anglicans, Quakers, Dutch Reformed, Baptists, Lutherans, Puritans, and Presbyterians who came together to pray, overlooking their denominational differences to unite together for a common goal. Dennis Prager, an American conservative radio talk-show host and writer, explains, "Ultimately, they wanted people to be free to practice their religion and relate to God in their own way. They all knew God is the source of liberty."  Freedom's Ultimate SacrificeAs Christians, we know freedom comes through Jesus' sacrifice. As 1 John 2:2 explains, "He is the atoning sacrifice for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world." Likewise, sacrifice led the way for our nation's freedom, too. Retired Judge Darrell White describes, "In a nutshell, our founders sacrificed their prosperity for their posterity, us. They pledged their lives, their fortune, and their sacred honor to secure our blessings of liberty." Because Jesus laid down His life, we have been set free from sin. This foundational freedom strengthened and led the way for men and women before us to lay down their lives so that we might live in a nation founded on liberty for all. As Dr. Jerry Newcombe, Executive Director of Providence Forum, explains, "We are free in large part because others sacrificed on our behalf that we might be free." Let's Pray:  Dear Father,Today and every day, we celebrate the freedom You give us and how it laid the foundation for our nation to be free. Thank You for the freedom You give to us through Your Son, Jesus Christ. Because of You, true freedom is possible and stirs the hearts of Americans and people around the world. Let Your name be glorified in our celebrations. Help us celebrate in ways that bring You praise and honor. Remind Americans how You divinely led Christians to set sail and settle this land for Your glory. Show us, too, O Lord, how to be grateful and respectful to the men and women who came before us, sacrificing their lives and futures, braving and suffering hardship, to establish this land for Your glory so future generations could live free.In Jesus' name, amen. Photo credit: ©GettyImages/fotostorm Lynette Kittle is married with four daughters. She enjoys writing about faith, marriage, parenting, relationships, and life. Her writing has been published by Focus on the Family, Decision, Today's Christian Woman, kirkcameron.com, Ungrind.org, StartMarriageRight.com, and more. She has a M.A. in Communication from Regent University and serves as associate producer for Soul Check TV. Teach Us to Pray is a FREE prayer podcast hosted by iBelieve writer Christina Patterson. Each week, she gives you practical, real-life tips on how to grow your faith and relationship with God through the power of prayer. To listen to her episode on What to Pray in the Morning for a Worry-Free Day, click below! Now that you’ve prayed, are you in need of someone to pray for YOU? Click the button below! Visit iBelieve.com for more inspiring prayer content. The post A Prayer to Prepare Our Hearts to Celebrate Our Nation’s 4th of July – Your Daily Prayer – July 4 appeared first on GodUpdates.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Satire
Conservative Satire
1 y Funny Stuff

rumbleOdysee
Whoever is running Biden's social media is just as SENILE as he is...
Like
Comment
Share
BlabberBuzz Feed
BlabberBuzz Feed
1 y

Biden's DHS SECRETLY Deports Thousands Of Chinese Nationals: Hrmmm, What's Going On Here?
Favicon 
www.blabber.buzz

Biden's DHS SECRETLY Deports Thousands Of Chinese Nationals: Hrmmm, What's Going On Here?

Like
Comment
Share
Living In Faith
Living In Faith
1 y

Does God Promise to Bless America?
Favicon 
www.thegospelcoalition.org

Does God Promise to Bless America?

In 1976, as America celebrated its 200th birthday, the number one song in many of the nation’s churches was Neil Enloe’s “Statue of Liberty.” The Dove Award Song of the Year likened the cross to the statue as a powerful symbol of freedom. In the same year, Jimmy and Carol Owens popularized a song that helped a generation of Christians memorize 2 Chronicles 7:14 (KJV): “If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land.” During America’s bicentennial year, nostalgic yearning for better days created a unique historical context. In “God and Country” worship services, “If My People” was performed and accompanied by patriotic symbols like the American flag. Sight and sound fixed in many minds that 2 Chronicles 7:14 was about America. “My people” were Americans, and “their land” was the United States. And in 1976, the United States needed healing. In the three years prior, Americans had endured the energy crisis, Roe v. Wade, the Watergate hearings, Richard Nixon’s resignation, the fall of Saigon, the worst tornado outbreak on record, unprecedented divorce rates, and a recession that ended the post–World War II economic expansion. America had lost her way, and the reason was obvious to the nation’s evangelicals: America left God, so God was leaving America. But if they returned, God would heal the nation and restore American greatness. In 1977, Peter Marshall coauthored The Light and the Glory. Marshall’s Ivy League credentials bolstered his claims that the American people were meant to be “a light to lighten the Gentiles” (Luke 2:32, KJV) and that America was “God’s new Promised Land.” Marshall’s work provided the cement that joined 2 Chronicles 7:14 to the U.S. In 1980, with a view to bringing America “back to God,” evangelicals helped elect Ronald Reagan. America now had a wise Solomon, and hope was growing that God would heal the land’s spiritual, economic, and military sickness through political means. On January 20, 1981, Reagan was sworn in on the Capitol steps, with his left hand on his mother’s Bible open to 2 Chronicles 7:14. The cement had cured. There are two common mistakes regarding 2 Chronicles 7:14. The first is to abuse it, using it to justify a flag-wrapped form of prosperity theology. The second is to excuse it, as if it weren’t “written for our instruction” (Rom. 15:4). Because it’s God’s Word, it’s wise to ask, How should we apply 2 Chronicles 7:14? Here are four guidelines. 1. Clarify the context. The famous verse addresses a specific people, place, and time. The “people” is Israel. The place is the promised “land.” The time is Solomon’s reign while the Mosaic covenant is active. If Israel obeys, God will bless them in the land by securing their borders and strengthening their economy. But if they turn from him, he’ll raise up adversaries and ruin their crops. By wounding their land, he’ll provoke them to repentance. In love, he’ll sacrifice their comfort to secure their commitment. There are two common mistakes regarding 2 Chronicles 7:14. The first is to abuse it. The second is to excuse it. The promise is to God’s redeemed people in the promised land during the only legitimate theocracy in history. Israel’s kings were duty-bound to execute idolaters, blasphemers, and false prophets. By walking in God’s ways and purging the land of rebels, the kings forestalled God’s judgment. When the kings failed, God sent his people into exile as a landless “holy nation” (Ex. 19:6). Under the new covenant, God’s redeemed people are likewise a landless “holy nation” (1 Pet. 2:9). Scattered over the earth, we build houses, raise families, go to work, and “seek the welfare” (Jer. 29:7) of our nation by cooperating with non-Christians in economic and political pursuits for the common good. Like synagogues in the exile, churches represent the true God among idolaters. We cross national borders with Bibles, not bombs, and multiply peacemaking embassies among the nations. Because our time and place drastically differ from Solomon’s, we proceed with caution. 2. Consider the church’s ‘wicked ways.’ While the verse doesn’t directly apply to America, it certainly applies to the  American church. The four conditions of humbling, praying, seeking, and turning are elements of biblical repentance. Does the church in America need to repent of wicked ways? Are we guilty of pride, idolatry, greed, ingratitude, corrupt leadership, financial and sexual scandal, factions, false teaching, counterfeit gospels, partiality, and injustice? While the verse doesn’t directly apply to America, it certainly applies to the  American church. Are whole denominations in moral rebellion against God? Is there more reliance on clever strategies, branding, and rhetorical skill than on the Holy Spirit? Has political activism supplanted desperate pleas for God to open hearts to “pay attention” to the gospel (Acts 16:14)? Is there more passion for telling non-Christians how to vote than how to know Christ? Do we pursue church growth while neglecting church discipline? Are third-order controversies diverting energy from disciple-making? Are church members theologically inept, biblically illiterate, and digitally gullible? Are Very Online pastors wasting precious time on social media? Are evangelical leaders slandering one another to impress their theological tribe? Second Chronicles 7:14 isn’t given to us to judge Americans outside the church. It’s given to us to judge our own hearts. It’s not a rebuke to “them.” It’s a rebuke to “us.” It’s not a window through which we criticize the world’s wickedness. It’s a mirror by which we call out our own. 3. Confirm what God promised. Under the Mosaic covenant, God promised to bless obedient Israel with both spiritual and material prosperity. But God made no such promise to the U.S. or its churches. Some of the world’s most faithful churches and obedient Christians endure poverty, not prosperity; persecution, not peace. For now, God only promises to bless the faithful church with spiritual blessings such as salvation, forgiveness, unity, fruitfulness, endurance in suffering, and his faithful presence (Eph. 1:3). Material blessings do await the church. God does promise health and wealth to his people. As the adopted children and legal heirs of the Father, all that is his belongs to all who are his. In the new earth, “death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain” (Rev. 21:4). We already have the spiritual blessings of the new covenant, but unending health and wealth come after we finish the race, not before (Heb. 12:1–3). Second Chronicles 7:14 isn’t a window through which we criticize the world’s wickedness. It’s a mirror by which we call out our own. Even if the church in America experiences historic revival, there’s no covenantal guarantee that God will pour out physical, material, military, and economic blessings on America. For his own secret purposes, God “makes nations great, and he destroys them; he enlarges nations, and leads them away” (Job. 12:23). 4. Concentrate on passages directed to all nations. At least since 1976, evangelicals have asked too much of 2 Chronicles 7:14. Other passages can carry the load because they address nations that, like America, are not theocratic Israel. Rome received God’s wrath because of its moral rebellion (Rom. 1:18). Nineveh postponed God’s wrath because it repented (Jonah 3:10). Sodom incurred God’s wrath because it didn’t repent (Jude 7). God holds the U.S. government responsible for enforcing the second table of the Ten Commandments (Rom. 13:1–10), so we pray for officials to wisely maintain public order and to guard our freedom to publicly obey the first table (1 Tim. 2:1–4). True Patriotism And this is where we can agree with those patriotic, neighbor-loving impulses of 1976. If we love America, we’ll intercede for her. We’ll plead for justice, peace, and prosperity in our communities. We’ll pray with a willingness to be God’s answer to our prayers through faithful witness, mercy ministries, peaceful protest, and principled political engagement. We’ll petition God with the confidence that a hundred thousand years from now, the U.S. will have gone the way of all nations, but his church will be flourishing on the earth. We’ll pray knowing that God is the Potter, the nations are clay, and he has declared his sovereign prerogative to bless any nation that “turns from its evil” and to withhold good from any nation that doesn’t (Jer. 18:7–10). How will America hear God’s voice? Through the humble, praying, God-seeking, sin-hating, spiritually healed churches of America. For judgment begins “at the household of God” (1 Pet. 4:17).
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
1 y

Deranged Joy Reid Rambles About ‘King Trump’, Project 2025
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

Deranged Joy Reid Rambles About ‘King Trump’, Project 2025

Once again, MSNBC host Joy Reid is offering viewers proof evident that she has terminal Trump Derangement Syndrome, as evidenced by the string of incoherences she rattled off to start tonight’s broadcast. These particular incoherences centered around the Supreme Court’s ruling on presidential immunity and the continued candidacy of President Joe Biden. Watch Reid ramble about the futility of debating over who the next Democrat nominee might be, and the rambling bleatings that follow: JOY REID:  Democrats are the anxiety people. They're always freaking out, assuming they're going to lose. They are also a normal political party. And debating whether an elderly president is the right choice to beat American Hitler is unsurprising, and honestly pretty politically healthy. If ill-timed, given the emergency our democracy is in. And who the Democrat nominee is is important on one level, because it speaks to the strategy of how to keep King Donald off the Iron Throne. But, real talk, it kind of doesn't matter. No, actually, it really doesn't matter. Because honestly, any Democrat, Biden, you name the popular Democratic governor or senator, Vice President Harris, any of them would be solid presidents, and far preferable to the Republican alternative, because all of them believe in the rule of law. Each of them would follow the traditional role of the presidency, and not try to be American Putin. None of them would use S.E.A.L. Team Six to assassinate their rivals, or expand presidential powers to turn the Justice Department into a witch hunt squad. None of them would arrest the entire Trump family and charge them with treason and put them in public show trials. None of them would round up millions of migrants and send them to concentration camps. Or make them fight in Fight Club like the Romans did. None of them would turn this country into a Christian Nationalist hellhole and ban books and criminalize teachers and drag shows.  And I guarantee you 100% not a single one of them would outlaw birth control, and the abortion pill, and IVF and force women and teenage girls into being forced birth chattel for the State. But you know who would do those awful things? That would-be king. Trump. Trump. Through his weak, spineless party, and the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 plan. And the Leo Six on the Supreme Court say that’s exactly what should happen. The president must be bold and rule by fiat. Eff the law. That shouldn’t even apply to him. And they have made clear that they would partner with King Trump.  As his loyal hands to rule us.  The segment actually opens with Reid dumping on Independence Day. REID: On the eve of America's Independence Day, when we commemorate the white male land and slave owners who declared themselves free from the yoke of the British king  To the race essentialist, everything becomes about race.  It is then that Reid rambles on about the Supreme Court opinion that clarified presidential power. Rather than informing her viewers, Reid launches into multiple tangents on ridiculous hypothetical scenarios. Rather than discussing what the opinion actually says, she evokes violent imagery as originally imagined by Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s emotional dissent in Trump v. United States. The segment was constructed for the purpose of bashing the Court, make no mistake. Last I checked, these hostile mentions of the Supreme Court sound very insurrection-y.  Once Reid is done vomiting nonsense, she begins her interview of Sherilynn Ifill on these very same subject matters, treading the same derivative ground, making arguments that would only make sense had Reid read the op-eds.   At their heart, these goofy hypotheticals are about projection. The authoritarians are on the left are who have weaponized government against everyday citizens. But, these arguments are con You, dear reader, may be inclined to feel a twinge of compassion for those of us who watch this bile so you don’t have to. But, as Hyman Roth said to Michael Corleone: this is the business we’ve chosen. Click “expand” to view the partial transcript of the aforementioned segment as aired on MSNBC’s The ReidOut on Wednesday, July 3rd, 2024: MSNBC THE REIDOUT 7/3/24 7:01 PM JOY REID: And we begin tonight with Hurricane Beryl hurtling toward the Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico. So be safe out there. Well, politically, we're weathering a different kind of storm here at home. On the eve of America's Independence Day, when we commemorate the white male land and slave owners who declared themselves free from the yoke of the British king, the Leonard Leo Six on the Supreme Court have decreed that the American president is, in fact, a king. So by that logic, all hail King Biden, am I right? Because America’s king right now, per the conservative Supreme Court majority, is Joe Biden. He is also the Democratic Party's candidate to be president/king again. And despite some Democrats jumping ship and saying he should drop out, and the frantic meetings and calls taking place inside the Democratic Party, today Biden told his campaign staff the following. Quote: “let me say this as clearly as I possibly can. As simply and straightforward as I can.I am running. No one’s pushing me out. I'm not leaving, I'm in this race to the end and we’re going to win.  ♪♪ And I am telling you ♪♪  Okay, look. The truth is, this is basically who Democrats are, okay? Democrats are the anxiety people. They're always freaking out, assuming they're going to lose. They are also a normal political party. And debating whether an elderly president is the right choice to beat American Hitler is unsurprising, and honestly pretty politically healthy. If ill-timed, given the emergency our democracy is in. And who the Democrat nominee is is important on one level, because it speaks to the strategy of how to keep King Donald off the Iron Throne. But, real talk, it kind of doesn't matter. No, actually, it really doesn't matter. Because honestly, any Democrat, Biden, you name the popular Democratic governor or senator, Vice President Harris, any of them would be solid presidents, and far preferable to the Republican alternative, because all of them believe in the rule of law. Each of them would follow the traditional role of the presidency, and not try to be American Putin. None of them would use S.E.A.L. Team Six to assassinate their rivals, or expand presidential powers to turn the Justice Department into a witch hunt squad. None of them would arrest the entire Trump family and charge them with treason and put them in public show trials. None of them would round up millions of migrants and send them to concentration camps. Or make them fight in Fight Club like the Romans did. None of them would turn this country into a Christian Nationalist hellhole and ban books and criminalize teachers and drag shows.  And I guarantee you 100% not a single one of them would outlaw birth control, and the abortion pill, and IVF and force women and teenage girls into being forced birth chattel for the State. But you know who would do those awful things? That would-be king. Trump. Trump. Through his weak, spineless party, and the Heritage Foundation's Project 2025 plan. And the Leo Six on the Supreme Court say that’s exactly what should happen. The president must be bold and rule by fiat. Eff the law. That shouldn’t even apply to him. And they have made clear that they would partner with King Trump.  As his loyal hands to rule us. So, the fantasy football conversation in the mainstream media about the Democratic?, Okay, go for it. Just remember, there is no one on the Democratic side, including the super-old guy, who is a threat to American democracy. Pay as much attention as you can to the candidate debate as you need to. It's a worthy debate. Just make sure that you’re prepared to vote in November for whoever that person is, and every Democrat below them on the ticket. Because the alternative is King Trump and Project 2025 as the new rule of law.  
Like
Comment
Share
RedState Feed
RedState Feed
1 y

CNN's Jim Acosta Weighs in on Biden 'Napgate' and Gets Exactly the Responses He Deserves
Favicon 
redstate.com

CNN's Jim Acosta Weighs in on Biden 'Napgate' and Gets Exactly the Responses He Deserves

CNN's Jim Acosta Weighs in on Biden 'Napgate' and Gets Exactly the Responses He Deserves
Like
Comment
Share
Science Explorer
Science Explorer
1 y

COVID's Hidden Toll: Full-Body Scans Reveal Long-Term Immune Effects
Favicon 
www.sciencealert.com

COVID's Hidden Toll: Full-Body Scans Reveal Long-Term Immune Effects

Even in those without long COVID.
Like
Comment
Share
Conservative Voices
Conservative Voices
1 y

Is It Time for South Korea to Get the Bomb?
Favicon 
www.theamericanconservative.com

Is It Time for South Korea to Get the Bomb?

Foreign Affairs Is It Time for South Korea to Get the Bomb? “Extended deterrence” is fraying. (Photo by Kim Jae-Hwan/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) The Russo–Ukrainian war is reshaping security concerns around the world. Washington’s proxy war against Moscow encouraged the latter to strike back globally, challenging American policy in Africa, the Middle East, and Asia. Most dramatic may be Russia’s revival of relations with North Korea. Highlighted by President Vladimir Putin’s trip to Pyongyang, the two governments signed a new mutual defense pact and intimated that ties go well beyond the sale of artillery shells and missiles to Moscow. Putin appears to have implicitly accepted the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea as a nuclear power. Moreover, Western policymakers fear Russian technical support for the North’s missile and nuclear programs. Although the Putin government has reason for caution in aiding Pyongyang, U.S. support for Ukraine has helped the latter kill Russian personnel and destroy Russian materiel. Moscow must be tempted to empower the North to strike America rather as Washington has enabled Kiev to hit Russia. This has helped fuel rising support in the Republic of Korea for a tougher line toward the DPRK. For many South Koreans, that means backing a homegrown nuclear program to match the North. A newly released survey by the Korea Institute for National Unification, conducted before the Putin-Kim summit, found that two thirds of those polled supported the ROK’s acquisition of nuclear weapons, up from 60 percent last year. Some 45 percent preferred producing nukes over maintaining an American military garrison, compared to just 34 percent last year. In the past popular support for a nuclear option failed to generate significant political backing. Official policy is to rely ever more tightly on the U.S., clinging to the Washington Declaration, by which the Biden administration promised to risk the incineration of American cities to protect the ROK. Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell opined “that the mechanisms that we’ve put in place … the Washington Declaration and the strategic initiatives that have been launched to underscore the added signification of American extended deterrence, particularly in situations like Korea, I think it’s given us what we need to work with now.” South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol is publicly on board. So is Won Hee-ryong, a former cabinet minister running to head the ruling People Power Party: “We need to boost our nuclear deterrence against North Korean threats by ensuring the effectiveness of the declaration.” However, burgeoning Russian-North Korean military cooperation is challenging the status quo. Observed Allison Hooker, a member of President Donald Trump’s National Security Council staff, “I think we cannot rule out the fact that South Korea continues to move, maybe more rapidly, towards its own nuclear program.” Last year, President Yoon observed that if the North Korean threat “becomes more serious, we could acquire our own nuclear weapons, such as deploying tactical nuclear weapons here in ROK.” Senior members of his party are now taking up the issue.  For instance, Han Dong-hoon, who also is running for PPP leader, contended that “we should move at least to the point of equipping ourselves with potential capabilities to go nuclear whenever we decide to do so, just like Japan is now.” He added, “The global security situation is constantly changing, so there are limitations to relying solely on our allies.” Nevertheless, fearing sanctions, he opposes moving directly to building nuclear weapons. Assemblywoman Na Kyung-won, another candidate for party head, went further: “The history of the international community shows that only countries with the power to suppress external threats have survived. This is why we must keep all doors open and consider nuclear armament now.” She added that “even if nuclear weapons development is restricted due to Korea-U.S. relations or international norms, we will prepare to develop nuclear weapons in a short period of time right now.” More radical is Daegu Mayor Hong Joon-pyo, who proposed withdrawing from the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). He asked, “Can the United States defend Seoul while risking New York turning into a sea of fire,” as threatened by the DPRK? Indeed, six decades ago French President Charles de Gaulle asked a similar question, withdrawing his nation from NATO’s integrated military command structure and producing nuclear weapons.  “Now is the time that we show our determination like de Gaulle’s,” declared Hong. He also pointed out that “Ukraine was the world’s third-largest nuclear power, but it disarmed its nuclear weapons following security assurances from the U.S., Britain and Russia and as a result, Ukraine is now facing Russia’s nuclear attack.” Seoul Mayor Oh Se-hoon, a potential PPP presidential candidate, contended that the ROK required “an ‘active nuclear umbrella’ or its own nuclear weapons,” since “a ‘passive nuclear umbrella’ that depends entirely on the will of the United States is inadequate.” Other officials who previously pushed the nuclear option include National Assemblyman Cho Kyoung-tae and retired general Leem Ho-young.  Hong articulated the essential flaw in the doctrine of extended deterrence, by which Washington guarantees the security of many, indeed, most of its allies through use of nuclear arms, if necessary. For what are Americans prepared to turn their homeland into a battleground? The Cold War infused such promises with greater credibility. Even more important, in the case of North Korea, the U.S. seemed safe since Pyongyang lacked both nukes and ICBMs. War would be costly, but only the Korean peninsula would be at risk. That is no longer the case. The North is a nuclear power. It could have hundreds of nuclear weapons by the end of the decade. It is developing ICBMs along with multiple warheads. Virtually no one believes that the North will surrender its arsenal. Given the risks of military preemption, the U.S. and ROK must learn to live with a nuclear North Korea. A Second Korean War could end with a North Korean nuclear attack on American cities. Of course, Kim Jong Un is unlikely to launch a first strike, which would guarantee his own destruction. If Washington endangered his regime, he could respond by threatening mutual Götterdämmerung. What American president would risk the American homeland for an alliance that, despite its closeness, is not vital for his or her nation’s survival?  South Koreans realize this. Yoon admitted last year, “What we call extended deterrence was also the U.S. telling us not to worry because it will take care of everything, but now, it’s difficult to convince our people with just that.”  As for Washington’s boilerplate affirmations of eternal affection and love, South Koreans should remember the toothless Budapest Memorandum, issued to encourage Ukrainians to yield their Soviet-era nuclear weapons. The Washington Declaration offers no greater assurance. To suggest that Uncle Sam cannot be believed generates mild hysteria in Washington. The Declaration is cited as if possessing talismanic powers, able to ensure America’s continued protection of South Korea without risk. Not everyone is so sanguine, however.  A few years ago, the Hoover Institution’s Michael Auslin pointed out,  While few believe Kim Jong Un would launch an unprovoked nuclear strike, most seasoned Korea watchers believe that he would no doubt use his arsenal once it became clear he was about to lose any war that broke out. As this risk increases, Washington will find it increasingly difficult to avoid reassessing the country’s multi-decade alliance with South Korea. The threat to American civilians will be magnified to grotesque proportions, simply because Washington continues to promise to help South Korea. What if the U.S. drops its defense guarantee? The argument for America to provide the conventional defense of the ROK is long expired. The South is far wealthier than its northern neighbor. The former has a larger population and is a major international actor. Seoul can handle its own conventional defense.  Nevertheless, the DPRK’s nuclear weapons pose a unique danger. Perhaps powerful conventional weapons would offer sufficient deterrence. Perhaps not. Would South Koreans accept the risk of going naked, so to speak? If not, Seoul would have to build its own nuclear arsenal. Of course, the idea is a lot simpler in theory than when transformed into policy. The opposition Democratic Party rejects the idea. And there are real downsides. More nukes create more opportunities for proliferation and accidents. Nuclear powers China and Russia would be opposed, though they might do little in practice to punish Seoul. Japan would be plunged into a fractious debate about following suit. The ROK’s civilian nuclear export industry would be vulnerable to international restrictions.  Still, all that would really matter would be Washington’s reaction. No doubt, nonproliferation lobbyists would battle alliance advocates. There would be a blizzard of competing webinars, podcasts, op-eds, and policy papers on the issue. If opposed, the U.S. could apply diplomatic pressure, organize international opposition, impose economic penalties, propose UN sanctions, withdraw American military forces, downgrade or even end the alliance, or take some combination of these actions.  However, if Washington forthrightly dropped extended deterrence, it could not easily demand that the South remain exposed to North Korea’s growing nuclear capability. The U.S. can easily disengage since it possesses an overwhelming nuclear deterrent. The ROK understandably might then choose to deploy its own deterrent. Which Seoul could shape to meet its own needs and control to defend its own interests. Nonproliferation would suffer, but North Korea’s arsenal already has ruptured the NPT regime. Moreover, the US accommodated its British and French allies when they went nuclear, closed its eyes and ears when Israel chose the atomic option, and reluctantly abandoned sanctions when India and Pakistan developed nuclear weapons. It is a bit late for Uncle Sam to declare that interest and honor prevent acceptance of a ROK bomb. The DPRK’s growing nuclear arsenal will irrevocably change the Korean peninsula’s balance of power. Russia’s enhanced relationship with Pyongyang, even if short-lived, will accelerate this process. Despite Washington’s desperate attempt to preserve extended deterrence, the policy will steadily lose credibility as Americans become less likely to risk their homes and South Koreans become less likely to believe that Americans will do so. Then what?  Waiting for a crisis could yield disaster. Seoul and Washington should begin to discuss the nuclear future of Northeast Asia. The possibility of friendly proliferation has been broached in Washington. For instance, Ohio’s then-Representative Steve Chabot proposed that the U.S. “enter into talks with both Japan and South Korea about considering nuclear weapons programs themselves.” It wasn’t his preferred option, but he said he hoped that “even talking with [the South Koreans] would get the PRC’s attention and maybe they would actively act to restrain North Korea for the first time.”  Extended deterrence is losing credibility on the Korean peninsula. What should replace it? As North Korea becomes a more formidable nuclear power, a South Korean nuclear weapon becomes ever more likely. It might not be a good option. However, it might be the best alternative available. We should prepare for a very different future. The post Is It Time for South Korea to Get the Bomb? appeared first on The American Conservative.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 64511 out of 97449
  • 64507
  • 64508
  • 64509
  • 64510
  • 64511
  • 64512
  • 64513
  • 64514
  • 64515
  • 64516
  • 64517
  • 64518
  • 64519
  • 64520
  • 64521
  • 64522
  • 64523
  • 64524
  • 64525
  • 64526
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund