Former Republican Rep. Mike Rogers has been visiting churches across Michigan during his Senate campaign, and has found that people of faith in the battleground state are worried about one issue above the rest: the economy. Rogers has visited around a dozen places of worship, traveling from the urban centers of Detroit and Pontiac to the towns of Traverse City in northwest Michigan and Marquette in the Upper Peninsula. Rogers told The Daily Wire that the church visits allow him to worship with Michiganders of diverse faith backgrounds, and then hear their perspective after services. During his conversations with Christians and church leaders, Rogers said that kitchen table issues are the concerns most often discussed. “A big part of it is what you would hear everywhere else: the cost of groceries, the cost of energy bills, their ability to try to make their paycheck last until the end of the month,” Rogers told The Daily Wire. “So many people are literally living paycheck-to-paycheck. That is always front-and-center.” Rogers said that moral issues — such as men competing in women’s sports — remain important topics for Christians in Michigan, but because “things have gotten so hard” financially over the past three-and-a-half years, people of faith are focusing on economic problems. “People of faith are like every other person who’s worried about their cost of goods and services, and they’re also worried about the moral aspect of the environment their kids are growing up in,” Rogers continued. Rogers is currently trailing Democrat Rep. Elissa Slotkin by five points, according to the RealClearPolitics polling average. The Michigan race, which was blown wide open after Democrat Sen. Debbie Stabenow announced last year that she would retire at the end of her term, is one of the numerous races Republicans are hoping to win to gain back control of the Senate. Republicans have not won a Senate race in Michigan since 1995. The Senate candidate argued that Evangelicals and Catholics “feel very disconnected” from Slotkin, who Rogers slammed for voting “100% for the Biden-Harris agenda.” He added that the pastors and priests he’s talked to are trying to help address their congregants’ financial needs while also “making sure they don’t step away from faith when times get really hard.” Pastor Lorenzo Sewell of Detroit’s 180 Church, one of the places of worship Rogers recently visited, told The Daily Wire that his roughly 300 congregants are mainly concerned about the economy and immigration. “People know that the rhetoric isn’t real as it pertains to the Harris and Walz ticket. They know the rhetoric isn’t real as it pertains to wages going up,” Sewell said. “Just because the median income goes up on paper, that doesn’t mean I have enough money to meet the end of the month.” Am I Racist? Is In Theaters NOW — Get Your Tickets Here! Sewell, who addressed the Republican National Convention in July, added that the people in his majority-black community know the economy “bleeds over into the immigration issue.” “We’re hearing people say that it would be better to take a three-day journey and leave the country and try to come back in because immigrants in our community are being treated better than those who are legally there,” he said. “These are real pain points for people in poverty today.” Former President Donald Trump also visited 180 Church in Detroit for a roundtable discussion in June. Sewell said that Trump and Rogers coming into the black community and visiting his church “set a new trajectory” for the Republican Party in Michigan. He argued that the Democratic Party has enjoyed most of the support from black voters while “pillaging” the black community for decades. “You need a guy like Mike to fight for us,” Sewell said, adding. “I don’t have any personal problems with Elissa Slotkin, but her policies are not real as it pertains to people in poverty.” Rogers’s focus on connecting with people of faith hasn’t been limited to Christians. The Senate candidate also said he has visited a Buddhist temple and has met with Muslim leaders. “Set aside the Israel-Palestine issue for a minute, and Muslim voters line up with Republicans,” Rogers said. “They’re very conservative. They’re socially conservative. They’re fiscally conservative. They’re worried about the future of the country that they have come to live in and enjoy. And they’re worried about the state of education for their kids.” “They’re small business owners,” he added. “They worry about the economic environment and what this heavy regulatory regime coming out of the Democrat Party is doing to them, not for them.”

Vice President Kamala Harris reportedly once tried, unsuccessfully, to block Kimberly Guilfoyle from working for the San Francisco District Attorney’s office, a story that Guilfoyle says demonstrates Harris’ history of undermining other women. A Monday New York Times report notes that Harris tried to block Guilfoyle from getting a job in the San Francisco District Attorney’s office around 2000, as both women were on the rise in California politics. Guilfoyle, now a Trump campaign surrogate who is engaged to Donald Trump Jr., tells The Daily Wire that the incident encapsulates how Harris relates to other women. “The fact is that for decades Kamala Harris has turned public service into self-service,” Guilfoyle told The Daily Wire. “From her conduct at the San Francisco DA’s office all the way to the vice presidency, she’s tried to lift herself up by attempting to bring others down.” “She may talk about wanting to help other women, but reality tells a far different story,” Guilfoyle added. “And it extends to her party’s entire platform. From efforts to destroy women’s sports to enabling a border invasion that has taken the lives of innocent girls, this is a candidate and an agenda laser-focused on undermining the lives of women across this country.” Guilfoyle and Harris “were young lawyers, rising political stars and social acquaintances in the most exclusive quarters of San Francisco civic life,” the Times notes. Harris’ ex-lover, former San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, described the two as “superstar women” to the Times, saying, “They represented the city.” (Eva Marie Uzcategui/Bloomberg via Getty Images) When Guilfoyle sought a position in the San Francisco District Attorney’s office, around 2000, Harris sought to block her from doing so, SFGate reported at the time. According to the publication, Harris got a hold of Guilfoyle’s resume and then gave her a call. Both women were thought to be eying the San Francisco District Attorney position, which Harris went on to win in 2004 until 2010. A source close to Guilfoyle told The Daily Wire that she wasn’t actually interested in the position, and was instead looking towards larger opportunities in television. “She had bigger items, and the bigger items were television,” former Harris boyfriend Willie Brown told the Times. “That would be Kimberly. She had that kind of chutzpah.” But Harris’ interference indicated that she did not want Guilfoyle as a competitor in her arena. “She called me and said basically that she was on the hiring committee and in charge of the budget for the D.A.’s office, and that I should have gone through her if I wanted to return to the D.A.’s office — and that there was no money to hire me,” Guilfoyle told SFGate in 2003. The call surprised Guilfoyle, who was dating then-San Francisco Supervisor Gavin Newsom at the time, as SFGate reported. The publication said that Guilfoyle called the San Francisco D.A.’s office to find out what Harris’ call had meant — only to be told that Harris did not have a say in whether she was hired, and that there was no hiring committee at all. Harris pushed back on Guilfoyle’s claims, telling SFGate that her call was just “to see if she needed any help — to let her know I was there to help her.” “I never discouraged her from joining the office. I never suggested to her there wasn’t a job for her in the San Francisco D.A.’s office — of that, I’m very clear,” Harris told SFGate in 2003. “I think she is a great lawyer,” Harris reportedly added, “and I look forward to working with her.” According to the Times, Guilfoyle and Harris’ boss corroborated Guilfoyle’s story, and recalled how Harris had “fierce opposition to the move.” Neither the Harris campaign nor the White House responded to requests for comment. Guilfoyle did end up getting a job in the San Francisco D.A.’s office several months later, and would go on to prosecute a high-profile case concerning Diane Whipple, a woman who was mauled to death by dogs. According to SFGate, that “chaotic and tearful trial catapulted Guilfoyle to national fame, as news broadcasts carried nightly coverage of the day’s proceedings.” Guilfoyle would go on to work for Fox News, and now hosts The Kimberly Guilfoyle Show on Rumble. “The landmark Diane Whipple dog mauling case didn’t just show that Kimberly was a legal star,” the source close to Guilfoyle told The Daily Wire. “But that she was also destined to be a TV star, too. And her trajectory in years after confirms that.” Guilfoyle maintains that the anecdote is a good example of how Harris has postured on many issues related to women. She also points to Harris’ support of taxpayer-funded sex-change surgeries for illegal immigrant prisoners, which could allow biological male criminals to live among female prisoners. The Daily Wire reported last week that the Federal Bureau of Prisons has about 22,000 foreign nationals in its custody, and it appears that all of these prisoners are eligible for taxpayer-funded gender transitions.

What took so long

'We want to talk about polling'

This account was forwarded to me about the same time I started investigating the David Eckhart encounters and abductions. Rosario's scenario is a bit scary and may verify some concerns involving alien intentions. In our conversation, Rosario seemed very sincere and demonstrated spontaneous emotion when certain subjects were discussed:"I want to thank you for allowing me to tell my story. I have been a subscriber to your site for over a year and it has inspired me to open up so others be made aware of the complications that humans may face after an abduction by alien beings.""One early morning during the late Summer of 1990, I awoke from a very deep sleep. It was 3:35AM and still dark outside, though I'd be up in an hour or so since it was harvest time on the farm.I was feeling nervous as my heart pounded heavily. I sensed that there was someone in my bedroom, but all I could see was a spot of light in the corner by the dresser. Suddenly several hands grabbed me from all around the bed. I attempted to scream but could not move or say anything, nothing came out of my mouth.""Within seconds I found myself lying on a cold hard table completely nude and terribly uncomfortable. I looked around me and there were four small beings in hoods and loose robes standing around me. They were conversing with each other, but I could not understand what they were saying since it sounded like a young child's gibberish. I felt something touching me all over my body but could see nothing. The beings' faces had a weird glow with sagging folds of shining skin.""After what seemed like forever these beings slowing moved aside and this human-like man walked up to my side. He was tall, bald and had very pale skin. He also had large round eyes and was very slim. He came over to the table and started to talk to me in English. He calmly said that he was perplexed that I was so scared since he made it clear the last time that they had met he would return to ask a favor. He then turned and raised his hand, gesturing to a woman who walked into the room. She seemed to be a normal human female and quite beautiful. She had a small bundle in her arms and walked over to me. It was an infant, but it had pale skin and didn't look quite human.""The tall man instructed me that he wanted me to take the infant and care for it. It needed the love of a human mother since their race did not understand the emotion of love. I told him that I couldn't because I already had a child and it was hard enough raising my son alone on a farm when times were currently difficult for me. He raised his head up and down as if agreeing with what I said and passed his hands across my eyes. I must have passed out because I awoke to found myself in my bed.""It was daylight and I figured that I had been 'gone' for about 5 hours. When I tried to get out of bed, my legs and hips were very stiff and sore. I carefully stood up and noticed 2 large spots of wet blood on the bedsheets. The experience with the beings was still fresh on my mind but I had no idea that I had endured any probing or surgery.""A few days later, I decided to schedule a doctor's appointment just to make sure I was OK. The doctor recommended a full physical since my blood pressure was higher than usual and my ankles were swollen. An appointment was made at my local hospital for x-rays and blood work.""To make a long story short, I returned to my doctor's office a few days after the tests were performed. When I walked into her office, she asked me to sit down and explained that my right kidney was missing. She said that it was probably missing since birth and was just never noticed. I found this hard to believe since I had given birth to my child and have had other x-rays in the past. I just agreed with her assessment and was instructed that I would need to start taking hypertension medication and would need to be regularly monitored.""I am positive that the beings removed my kidney and performed other experiments on my body. Though it has been almost 20 years since that encounter, I just know that they will be back.""Lon, have you ever heard of organs and/or body parts being harvested from abducted humans?""I sincerely hope I can eventually get some answers." RNOTE: I did talk to Rosario and assured her that she wasn't the only person that I knew of who had whole or parts of organs removed during an abduction or encounter. It's been about a decade since I last talked to Rosario for an update. I hope she found some solace. LonAlien AbductionAbductions and Aliens: What's Really Going OnTouched - Alien Abduction and the Extreme Experience Research of Dr. John MackAlien Abduction-Odyssey of Betty & Barney Hill**********TIME ANOMALIES! TRAVELERS & GLITCHES | LIVE Chat | Q & A | Join Us! (AMAZING EXPERIENCER REPORTS)PHANTOMS & MONSTERS VIDEO LIBRARYPOLL: WHAT DO YOU THINK? Vote & comment on paranormal, cryptid & unexplained mysteries!LISTEN TO NARRATIONS OF PHANTOMS & MONSTERS REPORTS & CASES - PLEASE SUBSCRIBE, LIKE & SHAREPHANTOMS & MONSTERS RADIO Podcasts on SpotifyPHANTOMS & MONSTERS READING LISTCHICAGO MOTHMAN / O'HARE BATMAN YouTube PlaylistHave you had a sighting or encounter?Contact me by email or call the hotline at 410-241-5974Thanks. LonOUR SOCIAL MEDIA LINKSBigfoot and Other Cryptid Videos on YouTubeLYCANS! - PENNSYLVANIA'S CRYPTID CANINES UPDATE'KILLER BIGFOOT' HUNTED BY U.S. SPECIAL FORCES / GLIMMER MAN / MANTIS HUMANOIDSCRAWLER HUMANOIDS - GRUESOME INVADERS! (REAL EYEWITNESS ENCOUNTERS!)WEREWOLVES: DO THEY EXIST?'DOGMAN IN OUR YARD!' - AN OHIO FAMILY'S 12-YEAR SAGA WITH CRYPTID CANINESHey, folks. Thanks for the congrats on 'The Mothman Revisited' episode on Unsolved Mysteries. As a result, we are receiving more sighting reports and are very excited and grateful for the new information!I sincerely thank the Unsolved Mysteries team and Netflix for allowing us to tell the world about this phenomenon.If you have information about this or any other cryptid or unexplained sighting or encounter, please feel free to contact me by email or at 410-241-5974. Thanks again! LonCHICAGO MOTHMAN / O'HARE BATMAN YouTube PlaylistChicago / Lake Michigan Winged Humanoid Regional Interactive MapHey, folks. Please feel free to share your thoughts & comments on the recently uploaded video of the CHICAGO MOTHMAN. I'm interested in what you have to say. Thanks. LonEXCLUSIVE VIDEO of CHICAGO MOTHMAN RECORDED----------Become a Phantoms & Monsters Radio member - just $2.99 monthly, and receive these perks. Thanks for your support!-Members-only live chats-Exclusive members-only videos-Priority reply to members' commentsHave perks suggestions? LMK-----YOUR SUPPORT IS APPRECIATED! THANKS

A 2-year-old female rhino known for her “boisterous” nature has just undergone surgery on her ulna in a world-first procedure. Using equine surgeons’ knowledge of similar procedures done on horses as a template, the team of specialist veterinarians successfully healed the rhino’s leg, and even got her up and about wearing a cast. Amara is […] The post In a World First, Surgeons Operate on Rhino’s Broken Leg and Fix Her Limp appeared first on Good News Network.

Two women in Georgia, along with their unborn children, are dead. If it weren’t for abortion drugs, they might all still be alive. But the abortion industry, the Left, and some in media are blaming Georgia’s abortion law. They’re wrong. Here are the facts of the two tragic cases—and how they could have been prevented. Amber Thurman In 2022, Amber Thurman sought emergency care due to complications after having an abortion using the two-drug regimen of mifepristone and misoprostol. At the time, she was about nine weeks pregnant with twins. Mifepristone cuts off a hormone that sustains pregnancy, causing the unborn child to die. Misoprostol causes uterine contractions to expel the dead child from the uterus. Thurman got the pills from an abortion clinic in North Carolina. As the abortion drug’s Food and Drug Administration warning label states (and the clinic should have highlighted), one of the possible complications is that sometimes not all of the dead child’s remains are expelled. MIFEPREXDownload This retained fetal tissue can cause an infection, which can become life-threatening. That’s exactly what happened to Thurman. The ProPublica article that initially reported these stories says that Georgia law prohibits the D&C (dilation and curettage) procedure necessary to remove retained tissue. That is totally false. Here’s what Georgia law actually says. Georgia law prohibits abortion of an unborn child with “a detectable human heartbeat.” An abortion is clearly defined as an act to deliberately “cause the death of an unborn child.” There are exceptions for cases of rape or incest, or if a woman’s life is in danger. Like every other pro-life state, no doctor is banned from treating ectopic pregnancy or miscarriages. And Georgia, like every other state in America, does not prohibit doctors from removing retained tissue. Pro-life doctors regularly perform D&Cs in pro-life states for cases of miscarriage or retained tissue. Why? Because a D&C in those cases is not an abortion. ProPublica points the finger at Georgia’s pro-life law for causing confusion or delays, but there’s no reason it should have. Thurman was clearly in a life-threatening emergency situation, and the procedure she needed to remove remaining tissue would not have been an abortion. As the American Association of Pro-Life OB-GYNs puts it, her case is “one of the most clear-cut cases of medical malpractice (based on the information available publicly) that we have ever seen.” ProPublica article claims that Georgia’s abortion law led to the tragic death of 28yo Amber Thurman.  Her preventable death was related to abortion – but not as the title implies. Read this ? on how physicians could have intervened to save her life…— AAPLOG (@aaplog) September 17, 2024 Thurman’s death was completely preventable. Dangerous abortion drugs and a lack of timely treatment deserve scrutiny—not Georgia’s pro-life law. Candi Miller In 2022, Candi Miller ordered abortion pills online. That means she was never evaluated in person by a doctor and never had an ultrasound to verify how far along in pregnancy she was. We don’t know if the website she got the pills from warned her of signs of complications to watch out for. For days after taking the pills, she suffered at home. According to her family, she was afraid to seek emergency care because she didn’t want to be prosecuted. She never should have been too afraid to seek help, because no states place criminal penalties on postabortive women. Miller died at home. An autopsy found that she had retained fetal tissue in her uterus, as well as some painkillers, including fentanyl, in her system. It’s not clear if she intentionally overdosed, or if she was desperate to lessen the pain of the abortion. Had she sought care in time, doctors might have been able to remove the retained tissue. In the article about Miller’s case, ProPublica yet again states that the D&C procedure to remove such tissue was a felony. And yet again, the claim is simply false. Deadly Consequences The facts of both cases haven’t stopped Vice President Kamala Harris from rushing to falsely blame pro-life laws for these women’s deaths, saying that pro-life laws prevent doctors from “providing basic medical care.” It hasn’t stopped the abortion industry from using these women’s tragic, preventable deaths as a reason to promote no limits on abortion whatsoever. It hasn’t stopped abortion advocates from spreading the deadly lie that women in pro-life states can’t seek lifesaving care. Another woman died of sepsis after taking abortion pills in 2022. Her name was Alyona Dixon, and she lived in Nevada. (Anna Moneymaker/Getty Images) Her family is suing a hospital for wrongful death, alleging that she wasn’t properly treated in a timely manner when her abortion went wrong. But Nevada has lax abortion laws, so it’s “crickets” from the same crowd who is eager to blame pro-life laws in Georgia. The sad truth is that these cases demonstrate why we should have stronger pro-life policies to protect women from dangerous abortion drugs—not weaker ones. Here are some of the ways these women’s stories could have ended differently if better protections had been in place. When the FDA approved abortion drugs in 2000, it required heightened safety standards. For example, women had to be seen in-person by a doctor, they had to ingest the pills in-person in a clinic, and they had to have an in-person follow-up visit to ensure that the abortion was complete. Abortion pills could only be used up to seven weeks’ gestation. In 2016, President Barack Obama’s administration weakened those safety requirements. An in-person follow-up visit was no longer required, and the pills could be taken up to 10 weeks. The Biden administration weakened the safety mechanisms further. Pills now can be dispensed through the mail, and women don’t have to see a provider in person at any point. Those changes have consequences. We know, for example, that abortion pills are less effective, and complications are more likely the further along a woman is in her pregnancy. Thurman was more than nine weeks along with twins. Miller was never seen in person by a doctor; so, without an ultrasound, we don’t know how far along she was in pregnancy (and neither does the website that shipped her the pills). She may have been much further along than 10 weeks, the FDA-approved limit. Had either of these women had an in-person follow-up appointment after their abortions, perhaps a doctor would have realized sooner that they had not expelled all of their children’s remains and were at high risk of infection. Abortion drugs have known, deadly risks, which include complications like retained tissue and infection. The FDA label for mifepristone says that roughly one out of 22 women who take the drugs will have to go to the emergency room. Did Thurman and Miller know about these risks? These poor women’s tragic deaths show that removing safety mechanisms for dangerous drugs can have deadly consequences. It should spur policymakers to do more to protect women and babies, not weaken pro-life laws. Instead, the pro-abortion movement is lying about pro-life laws. Lying has consequences. How many women like Miller will not seek emergency care when they need it because they (wrongly) think a doctor won’t be able to treat them? Thurman, Miller, and their children deserved better. American women deserve better. It’s time to stop the lies. Abortion drugs end lives. Pro-life laws save lives. The post 2 Women Are Dead After Abortion Drug Complications. The Left’s Bid to Blame Pro-Life Laws Is Dishonest. appeared first on The Daily Signal.

'I Tried My Best': Trump Assassin Plotted for Months

British Labour Party Doing the Dry Run for Harris Tax Policies

Last week, news broke that New York magazine Washington correspondent Olivia Nuzzi was in a sexting relationship with her source, former presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. while writing about him, and aggressively sending him nude pictures of herself. But instead of decrying Nuzzi for doing a disservice to female reporters everywhere by engaging in the type of unethical actively she once insisted didn’t really happen, most of the liberal ladies of ABC’s The View defended her on Monday’s show and blamed all men for the scandal. The ridiculous spin started with the show’s opening tease for the segment, where the announcer huffed: “Breaking nudes? RFK Jr. ignites a scandal for reportedly bragging about being sent nude photos from a prominent journalist Olivia Nuzzi. But is most of the fallout landing on her?” Coming back from their first commercial break, moderator Whoopi Goldberg suggested that Kennedy should be getting all the flack because he cheated on his wife, while ignoring the fact that Nuzzi was cheating on her fiancé, Ryan Lizza of Politico (who left his family to be with Nuzzi). She didn’t understand why Nuzzi had to live up to journalistic ethics: Now, she's been suspended by the magazine, and she issued a statement saying that their relationship was never physical, that she's sorry she didn't disclose it to her colleagues earlier. Now, he's been married to Cheryl Hines for a decade. And the question really is, why is all the fallout hitting her and not him? And why did -- if it was -- what was she supposed to disclose that she didn't disclose? Staunchly racist and anti-Semitic co-host Sunny Hostin (the descendant of slave owners) defended Nuzzi’s sexing by repeatedly insisting that she was sending “demure nudes.” “I also don't understand why it's all falling on her,” Hostin whined. “She's 31 years old. She's a young reporter. From what I understand is she's, you know, a fantastic reporter.”     Faux conservative Alyssa Farah Griffin admitted she considered Nuzzi a personal friend of hers because “She was really there for me in a part of my life when she didn't need to be.” She proclaimed Nuzzi was a “world-class journalist” and “considered one of the best profile writers.” “That piece she wrote of RFK was scathing of him, she didn’t pull punches,” she boasted. Farah Griffin tried to downplay what happened by suggested Nuzzi simply “blurred ethical lines.” She had a meltdown over people calling it an “Olivia Nuzzi Scandal” and demanded people call it an “RFK scandal.”   She proceeded to cry “sexism” about the whole incident – which Nuzzi willing took an aggressive part in – and demanded that all men be blamed for it: But it goes back to just the sexism that we fall into. The reality is this: people want to make money in this business. If you put up a picture of Olivia, more people are clicking than if you put up a picture of this man. I think men need to bare a little more responsibility in this. It’s just – It's so predictable. Surprisingly, the only cast member to bring any semblance of sense to the table was Ana Navarro. After taking some shots at Kennedy, by calling him “a dog and a ho,” she pointed out that the scandal boiled down to it being a major conflict of interest for Nuzzi, who “had more to lose”: The issue here is conflict of interest. That she was covering the presidential campaign while writing pieces. And the question is, because she was having this relationship, is there a conflict of interest? If not for that, listen, you can be freaky. You can send pictures. You can do whatever you want. Just not -- not if there's a conflict of interest in your job. For her part, pretend moderate Sara Haines didn’t address the scandal, nor push back on the nonsense defense of Nuzzi. Instead she warned against sending nudes to begin with and cautioned about the rise of A.I.-generated porn images based on those nude photos. “But I would also encourage anyone online to really watch what you're putting online ever because these clouds can be hacked into,” she added. The transcript is below. Click "expand" to read: ABC’s The View September 23, 2024 11:14:53 a.m. Eastern WHOOPI GOLDBERG: So, former presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has reportedly been bragging about being sent some nude photographs from prominent journalist Olivia Nuzzi, who did a recent profile on him for New York magazine. Now, she's been suspended by the magazine, and she issued a statement saying that their relationship was never physical, that she's sorry she didn't disclose it to her colleagues earlier. Now, he's been married to Cheryl Hines for a decade. And the question really is, why is all the fallout hitting her and not him? ALYSSA AFARH GRIFFIN: That’s the question. GOLDBERG: And why did -- if it was -- what was she supposed to disclose that she didn't disclose? (…) 11:16:01 a.m. Eastern SUNNY HOSTIN: It’s called Puck News. It’s an industry magazine, reported Friday night that Nuzzi allegedly sent demure nudes of herself to RFK Jr. During their sexing affair. So, I think that's what she had to disclose. She was also allegedly engaged to another person as well. And so, you have a married man and you have someone that's engaged. I also don't understand why it's all falling on her. She's 31 years old. She's a young reporter. From what I understand is she's, you know, a fantastic reporter. GOLDBERG: Well, you know her. ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: If I can jump in because I actually consider her a friend. She was really there for me in a part of my life when she didn't need to be. I’d also say she's considered a world-class journalist. She's young but she's considered one of the best profile writers. That piece she wrote of RFK was scathing of him, she didn’t pull punches. Now, I agree, it blurred ethical lines. I don't agree with what she did. I think she will acknowledge it and take responsibility. But I am – every time I see a headline that says ‘Olivia Nuzzi scandal’, no, RFK scandal! A former presidential candidate who’s married – for I want to say the third time – who engaged in this, who’s now a top surrogate to the Republican nominee for president. But it goes back to just the sexism that we fall into. The reality is this: people want to make money in this business. If you put up a picture of Olivia, more people are clicking than if you put up a picture of this man. I think men need to bare a little more responsibility in this. It’s just – It's so predictable. And finally, I don't believe in cancel culture. I think she is a person who has cut her teeth in this industry. She unquestionably made a mistake. But I think if she takes responsibility, she should absolutely should have a path back. ANA NAVARRO: Well look, I think the reason that she’s paying more consequences is because RFK – I kind of think everybody knows by now that he’s a dog and a ho and there’s no consequences. Right? It's kind of like with Donald Trump. Right? It's baked in. He's had a long, long record of philandering for many decades. His wife knows it and seems to be okay with it. So, like, what are the consequences for him? The truth is, Olivia, who I also know and think is extremely talented, had a lot more to lose in this. And she is losing it. You know, the magazine right now is conducting a review and an investigation of the situation. It was unethical, and it, kind of, now puts all her writings in a different perspective. And they're going through them with a fine-tooth comb to see if they see any conflict of interest. That's the issue, that she was covering – The issue here is conflict of interest. That she was covering the presidential campaign while writing pieces. And the question is, because she was having this relationship, is there a conflict of interest? If not for that, listen, you can be freaky. You can send pictures. You can do whatever you want. Just not -- not if there's a conflict of interest in your job. SARA HAINES: I feel like they couldn't put the scandal on RFK because he has so many they don't really have room anymore. [Laughter] HOSTIN: There’s a lot. HAINES: Cause the headlines are like – there's a little, kind of imbalanced. But I get the optics problem. This was her beat and she did this. But I can’t – not in regard to her, but to everyone out there, we have an A.I. problem coming up that's going to put us all in nude pictures that are going to circulate. We've had it already happen. There have been incidents where people have been crushed by this. But I would also encourage anyone online to really watch what you're putting online ever because these clouds can be hacked into. There's so much stuff. So, I always say, don't take nudeys. Like, just don't do it ever! Because, like, we know too much. Like, you can't do this. [Laughter as Goldberg makes a face] Okay, wait. If you’re going to take nudey, do it on a Polaroid. HOSTIN: These were very demure nudes though. They were demure. NAVARRO: Yes, but where they mindful? [Laughter] (…)