Click to Skip Ahead About Ultimate Bark Control OnGuard Overview Key Features Is OnGuard a Good Value? FAQ Our Experience Our Final Verdict We give Ultimate Bark Control OnGuard a rating of 4.75 out of 5 stars. Effectiveness: 5/5 Usefulness: 5/5 Range: 4.5/5 Build: 4.5/5 Check Price on Good Life No one likes a barking dog‚ whether it’s yours or your neighbor’s. This is the issue Good Life set out to address when they started their Ultimate Bark Control line. There are plenty of less-than-humane bark control options on the market. This company wanted theirs to be different. They wanted it to be effective but without causing the dog pain or increasing fear‚ which might exacerbate the issue in the long run. Good Life’s first Ultimate Bark Control product was their Dog Silencer. Like most of their products‚ this device emits a high-pitched tone that startles the dog to distract them from what they’re barking at. Much like a dog whistle‚ this tone is within dogs’ hearing range but too high-pitched for most people to hear. The long line of Ultimate Bark Control products is made to help you train your dog not to bark by consistently marking the behavior with an uncomfortable tone or vibration. Many of their products can even be used on neighboring dogs or free-roamers you encounter on the walking trail. I had the opportunity to try an Ultimate Bark Control product‚ their handheld OnGuard device‚ on my own dogs. Both my overly protective Dalmatian mix and my highly reactive Chihuahua have a tendency to bark. ALOT. After just a few days of using my new OnGuard trainer‚ my house got noticeably more peaceful. Find out how this product works‚ how effective it was‚ and more‚ in my full hands-on Ultimate Bark Control OnGuard review‚ below. About Ultimate Bark Control Ultimate Bark Control is a product line produced by a company called Good Life. This Oregon-based company started in 2002 with a variety of different products made to improve the lives of home and pet owners everywhere. Today‚ their focus is their bark control and pest management products. Their Ultimate Bark Control line includes automatic stationary devices‚ collars‚ and handheld trainers. Which Pets Are These Products Best Suited For? Ultimate Bark Control products are made for dogs who like to make noise (and for owners who don’t appreciate that noise). All their products can be used on dogs in the house while a few can also be used to help silence nuisance neighbor dogs. Because these products don’t cause harm or inflict pain‚ they are suitable for adult dogs of all sizes. I even had success using my OnGuard device to help train my cat and my almost completely deaf Chihuahua. The manufacturer does not recommend using ultrasonic products on puppies as their hearing is still developing. What Products Does Ultimate Bark Control Offer? Ultimate Bark Control has five different products made for training dogs not to bark. Dog Silencer Max – A stationary sound machine that reacts automatically to barking to silence stubborn dogs in your yard or the neighbor’s yard. Bark Control Pro – Similar to the Dog Silencer but more appropriate for sensitive dogs and shorter distances. BarkWise Complete – This collar automatically vibrates or emits an ultrasonic sound to disrupt barking humanely. Positive Pet Dog Training Collar – This collar emits a strong vibration when the remote is triggered‚ allowing you to disrupt bad behavior‚ such as jumping or begging‚ and help train more appropriate behavior. OnGuard – This handheld device allows you to target bad behavior‚ including barking‚ by manually disrupting it with an ultrasonic tone. OnGuard Overview Check Price on Good Life Here is an overview of the handheld OnGuard product that I tested out in my own home‚ including a look at its features‚ uses‚ and limitations. Features The OnGuard product is meant to be used as a handheld training device. Each time you press the button‚ the device emits a powerful ultrasonic sound. The speaker on the end of the device allows you to direct that sound to a single point‚ making this a great option for multi-dog households. In addition to making an ultrasonic correction sound‚ the device also features a flashlight and audible alarm. These two extra features make it very useful when you are out and about with your dog. The super-bright flashlight can light your path during evening walks or guide you around the campsite. And the alarm feature is great if you encounter unwanted attention from a stranger on your evening dog walk. Uses The main use of this multi-function tool is to help train your dog away from inappropriate behaviors. It works by pairing unwanted behavior with an irritating ultrasonic tone. While this tone will not hurt your dog‚ it is loud enough to get their attention to disrupt their behavior. Anytime your dog engages in undesirable behavior‚ such as barking‚ jumping‚ chewing‚ or whining‚ simply point the OnGuard device at them and hit the button. Once they stop what they’re doing to figure out where that obnoxious tone is coming from‚ redirect them to a more appropriate behavior and praise them. OnGuard can be used in the home as well as while you are out and about. It is fairly compact and comes with a lanyard so you can carry it on your wrist. It makes a highly useful companion for dog walks‚ hiking‚ and camping. Not only can you continue training your dog in these situations‚ but you can also use the ultrasonic feature to keep stray dogs and wildlife at bay. Limitations The ultrasonic tone OnGuard emits has a range of about 50 feet. The sound is strongest (over 105 dB) right next to the speaker and gets quieter the farther away your target is. The sound cannot penetrate objects‚ including windows‚ so a direct line between you and your pup is key. The device itself is well built and durable but care should be taken to keep it from getting wet. And‚ of course‚ don’t let your naughty dog chew on it. In Summary Pros Easy to use Very effective at short-range Can be used to disrupt multiple behaviors Useful extra features Compact and easy to carry Works on cats and wildlife too Cons Ultrasonic button is very sensitive Not effective through windows or obstacles Young human ears can hear the sound Key Features Check Price on Good Life Ultrasonic Sound The ultrasonic sound this device emits is at a frequency higher than 20‚000 Hz‚ making it too high for most adults to hear. Dogs‚ however‚ are extra-tuned into sounds in this range because they often signal danger. A twig snapping‚ leaves crunching—these are all sounds that register at high frequencies that our dogs’ ancestors knew to pay attention to. By using an ultrasonic tone‚ OnGuard taps into this instinct to pay attention to help disrupt poor behavior. And it does this without causing pain or harm. This makes it an effective tool for helping your dog learn to behave better without causing undue stress or fear. Handheld OnGuard is different from many Ultimate Bark Control products because it’s handheld rather than stationary and automatic. This makes it a great option for dogs who often bark in different parts of the house‚ as well as for owners who want to do more hands-on training. Being portable also makes it a good choice for training outside the home. Multiple Uses This tool is much more than a way to stop dogs from barking. It can also be used to stop other bad behaviors‚ such as jumping‚ begging‚ digging‚ nipping‚ chewing‚ and more. And thanks to the extra features‚ you can also use it as a flashlight and self-defense alarm. Is OnGuard a Good Value? OnGuard will cost you about $50 when it’s not on sale. This makes it one of the more affordable training options in the Ultimate Bark Control lineup. Compared to other handheld ultrasonic devices on the market‚ this one is on the more expensive end. But a quick look at the specifications of other products will tell you why. Most cheaper options out there max out at a range of 20 feet‚ while this one can reach distances of 50 feet. Check Price on Good Life FAQ How do I know if the device is working? In my experience‚ your dog will let you know by immediately stopping what they’re doing to look back at the device. But if you want a little extra assurance‚ a blue light on the top of the product will illuminate every time a sound is emitted. Does OnGuard come with a money-back guarantee? Yes‚ Ultimate Bark Control offers a 60-day money-back guarantee. If you’re not satisfied with your purchase or if OnGuard doesn’t work for your dog‚ you can get your money back. What kind of warranty comes with Ultimate Bark Control Products? All products‚ including OnGuard‚ have a 1-year warranty against defects. Is ultrasonic sound harmful to dogs? No‚ ultrasonic sound is not harmful to dogs. Using ultrasonic noise on your dog is no different than a human hearing a short loud tone at a lower frequency. As long as the tone is not sustained for long periods of time‚ there is no risk of hearing damage. Our Experience With OnGuard I spent much of my twenties working as a certified dog trainer. My approach to all training‚ whether obedience or behavior modification‚ has always been based on positive reinforcement. Meaning‚ you get your dog to behave the way you want by rewarding them for good behavior. Unfortunately‚ there are a few bad behaviors that are self-rewarding‚ such as barking‚ digging‚ and chewing. It’s hard training away these behaviors because whether the dog does what you want or does the bad behavior‚ they’ll be rewarded! In cases like this‚ using a simple (ie. not stress-inducing) correction can be useful. But giving a dog a quick “eh-eh!” can be difficult when they are barking their heads off. That’s why I thought the OnGuard device might be a useful option as a simple and effective correction. Testing It on My Dogs My dogs are both old and fairly well-behaved. But they do like to bark! Ragz‚ my Dalmatian mix‚ is incredibly protective and likes to bark at everyone who walks by. Her favorite thing is to sit on our elevated deck and yell at anyone she sees. Papyrus‚ my other dog‚ is a Chihuahua‚ and I think that’s about all I need to say about that. I started using OnGuard as soon as I got it out of the box. Each time I noticed the dogs go to the window or Ragz getting excited on the deck‚ I would grab it and get ready. The first time I pressed the button‚ both of them flipped around and stared at me in beautiful silence. This was an especially surprising reaction from Papyrus because he is almost completely deaf. Apparently‚ he can still hear those high notes! I continued using OnGuard every time they barked. Once they stopped and looked at me‚ I would call them over and reward them. The website says that some dogs get it immediately and some dogs are slower‚ with noticeable results within two weeks. My dogs definitely got it very quickly. One aspect of OnGuard that I didn’t anticipate was how it doubly reduced the noise in my house. Not only did it help quickly quiet my dogs down when they barked and reduce the amount of barking in general‚ but it also completely erased the need for me to yell at them when they barked. This‚ in itself‚ helped make our home a more peaceful place. Drawbacks I did note a couple of things about this device. For one‚ the sound doesn’t travel through objects‚ not even glass. Which meant I had to open the deck door before I could use it on Ragz outside. The other interesting thing is that my daughter‚ who has the strong‚ unsullied ears of a five-year-old‚ could hear the noise every time I pressed the trigger. Like the dogs‚ she did not like the sound! But my only real complaint about this device is that the ultrasonic button is incredibly sensitive. I accidentally set it off more than a few times when picking it up or putting it in my pocket. Overall Impression Despite a few minor issues‚ I was really happy with this product. Within a few days‚ my house already felt more peaceful. My dogs were already barking less and I didn’t have to yell at them to stop when they did. Interestingly‚ I also found that OnGuard worked very well to deter my rowdy kitten from scratching the furniture and attacking ankles. As a former dog trainer‚ I would highly recommend this product as a simple correction device for self-rewarding behaviors. It is very effective and does not cause fear reactions or stress the way many punishment-based anti-bark devices do. Check Price on Good Life Conclusion Training your dog not to bark can be a challenge‚ especially if they love doing it. OnGuard helps make this behavior less enjoyable without resorting to harmful punishment techniques. It helped create a more peaceful world in my own home in just a few short days. Not only were both my reactive dogs barking less‚ but I didn’t have to yell at them anymore to get them to stop. I would highly recommend this product to any dog owner looking for a quieter‚ calmer way to deal with unwanted barking. The post Ultimate Bark Control OnGuard Review 2023: Our Expert’s Opinion appeared first on Pet Keen.

Offering your hamster a piece of pasta can be a great treat because most hamsters adore the taste‚ and it won’t harm their health. Simply put‚ hamsters can eat pasta occastionally. Read more about this topic in the article below and stay safe by offering pasta to your hamster only in moderation. What is Pasta Made from? Pasta is one food that we can say is universally adored across the world. It comes in many shapes‚ sizes‚ colors‚ and flavors. While some people might enjoy making homemade pasta‚ the most common source is store-bought‚ commercially manufactured pasta. It is made from milled wheat‚ eggs‚ and water. Once the ingredients are mixed and cut into desired shapes‚ they are left to dry out‚ so the water content evaporates‚ making pasta easy to package with a long shelf life. While most people might believe that pasta is only a filler food that makes us gain weight and has no real benefits‚ some properties make it relatively beneficial. Regular dried pasta‚ made from refined flour—semolina—has higher protein levels than other types of pasta. This type of pasta is digested slower than other refined carbohydrates‚ gradually releasing blood sugar into your body. Also‚ pasta is a somewhat decent source of protein‚ supplying 6 to 7 grams per cooked cup. Nutritional Value of Pasta per 100 g Energy: 168 kcal / 701 kJ Water: 87.8 g Protein: 6.59 g Total Fat: 1.34 g Carbohydrates: 31.9 g Calcium: 7.68 g Iron: 1.46 g Magnesium: 23 mg Phosporus: 80.6 mg Potassium: 30.7 mg Sodium: 7.68 mg Image Credit: Oldmermaid‚ Pixabay Can Hamsters Eat Pasta? The excellent news for hamster owners is that pasta is an entirely safe snack to offer them. Pasta has no real benefits on hamsters’ health‚ but it isn’t harmful or toxic. However‚ it should be cooked prior to offering. Hamsters need more protein‚ with fewer carbohydrates‚ and pasta has plenty of carbs‚ so it should only be offered in moderation and not as a regular part of their diet. Pasta also contains gluten‚ which might cause gastrointestinal upset for your hamster‚ but as long as you stay moderate and don’t offer too much‚ it should be fine. How to Feed Pasta to Your Hamster When feeding pasta to your hamster for the first time‚ it is crucial to prepare it properly. This includes offering pasta without adding oils or salts. Make sure the past you have is free of any additives. Offer a small piece of pasta to your hamster first to see if they like it. If they eat a piece of pasta‚ monitor their behavior and health for 24 hours. You can continue feeding your hamster pasta safely occasionally if there are no side effects. However‚ if your hamster suddenly gets diarrhea‚ loses appetite‚ or starts vomiting‚ stop feeding them pasta as they might be allergic or sensitive to some ingredients. Ideal Hamster Diet If you are a confused hamster parent often wondering what the ideal nutrition for your pet is‚ you are not the only one. There are many sources of information concerning the perfect hamster diet; however‚ it is relatively simple. A hamster’s diet should be as similar as possible to their natural diets in the wild‚ and so are best based around hamster pellets and fresh vegetables. Feeding your hamster pellets is best because all the necessary nutrients are mixed into one form‚ not letting your hamster be a picky eater. Every pellet-based hamster diet needs to have: 15% to 25% protein 4% to 5% fat 5% fiber 35% and 40% carbohydrates It is best to work closely with your veterinarian to create a personalized plan tailored to your hamster; however‚ you can expect their diets to be based around pallets‚ fruits‚ vegetables‚ and occasional snacks in the form of insects like mealworms. There are certain human foods that hamsters can eat safely: Apples Broccoli Cabbage Cucumbers Grains Parsley Peach Pear Peas Image Credit: Didier‚ Pixabay Final Thoughts Being a diligent and devoted hamster parent includes reading all about the safety of particular food for them. When it comes to pasta‚ fortunately‚ it is entirely safe for hamsters to consume‚ as long as done only on occasion and in small amounts. While pasta doesn’t carry any significant health benefits‚ nutrients‚ or vitamins‚ it can be a potential source of protein. However‚ it is essential to note that pasta can only be offered as an occasional snack to your hamsters and should never replace their regular meals. Sources Pasta‚ fresh-refrigerated‚ plain‚ cooked Feeding your hamster – PDSA What Can Hamsters Eat? | PetMD Can Hamsters Eat Spaghetti? [Benefits &; Risks] – HamstersInfo.com   Featured Image Credit: Bella RaKo‚ Pixabay The post Can Hamsters Eat Pasta? Vet Approved Facts &; FAQ appeared first on Pet Keen.

House Speaker Mike Johnson brought a touch of reality to President Joe Biden's accusation that Republicans are using nothing but "lies" to smear him.After a brief speech at the White House on Wednesday‚ New York Post reporter Steven Nelson asked the president to respond to allegations that he "interacted" with Hunter Biden's business associates‚ citing polling that shows a majority of Americans‚ including a significant number of Democrats‚ believe he interacted with his family's business interests illegally or unethically."I’m not going to comment on that‚" Biden initially responded‚ before immediately commenting on the allegations."I did not‚ and it’s just a bunch of lies‚" he followed up. "They're lies. I did not. They’re lies."Biden‚ however‚ offered no counter-evidence to prove his accusation that Republicans are lying‚ nor did he engage with the growing amount of circumstantial evidence that House investigators have uncovered showing such interaction did occur.Johnson later responded to Biden's accusation by asserting Biden — not House Republicans — is the liar."The President just lied again to the American people‚" Johnson said. "FACT: There are at least 22 examples of Joe Biden speaking with or meeting with Hunter Biden’s foreign business associates." — (@) The response invokes the growing body of evidence that demonstrates the overlap between President Biden and his son's business schemes. The evidence‚ according to the House Oversight Committee‚ shows how Biden "was involved in his family’s influence peddling schemes‚ including while he served as Vice President."As more of that circumstantial evidence surfaced this past summer‚ the White House's narrative about Biden's alleged involvement changed significantly.Previously‚ Biden maintained that he never discussed any business with his son. But after former Hunter Biden associate Devon Archer testified to House investigators‚ the White House said Biden "was never in business with his son." — (@) Sometime in the next week‚ Johnson is expected to hold a floor vote in the House to open an official impeachment inquiry. The step does not mean the House will impeach Biden. Rather‚ it gives House investigators increased power to investigate the allegations of corruption and influence peddling. Republicans argue the step has become necessary because the Biden administration is not cooperating with their investigation willingly. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Approximately one in 10 students reported that they have been "disciplined or threatened with discipline" for expressing their views on college campuses‚ according to a recent survey conducted by the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression and College Pulse.The survey asked 2‚007 undergraduate students studying in the United States about the state of freedom of speech at their colleges. "Have you ever been disciplined by your college's administration for your expression on campus?" the survey asked.Roughly 3% of respondents answered‚ "Yes‚" while 6% replied‚ "No‚ but I have been threatened with discipline."Of those respondents‚ 26% stated the discipline or threat of discipline occurred as a result of speech they made in their dorm room‚ 22% in a meeting with an administrator‚ 21% during in-class discussion‚ 14% in a conversation with peers in a common shared space on campus‚ and 13% in written assignments.Students were also asked‚ "Has someone you know on campus ever been disciplined for their expression on campus?"Approximately 7% replied‚ "Yes‚" and 11% said‚ "No‚ but I know someone who has been threatened with discipline."As a result of the survey‚ FIRE concluded that roughly one in 10 college students were punished or threatened with punishment for their speech."If this sounds low‚ consider that given the total undergraduate population as of 2021‚ about 1.4 million undergraduate students may have been punished or threatened with discipline for their speech‚" FIRE's press release stated.FIRE director of polling and analytics Sean Stevens explained‚ "When students are as likely to be punished for their speech as they are to be left-handed‚ the situation on campus is clearly out of hand.""And worse‚ this will have a snowball effect‚ because students whose peers are censored will be more likely to keep their mouths shut‚" Stevens added.FIRE President and CEO Greg Lukianoff said‚ "It's a dark day for free speech when students aren't safe to express themselves in their own dorm rooms.""We hope that this data is a wake-up call for administrators and pushes them to examine the way they respond to reports of offensive speech‚" Lukianoff continued. "When in doubt‚ they should reach out to FIRE for guidance rather than disciplining students for sharing their opinions."The survey also found that 38% of students say they have heard speech on their college campus that they believe constitutes "an act of violence."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney spoke in largely empty auditorium for a free-admission lecture at Penn State University earlier this week‚ according to a photo shared by Young America's Foundation. — (@) Reaction on social media to the turnout for “A Conversation with Dylan Mulvaney” Tuesday evening in Alumni Hall was more than a little humorous: "Oh‚ well I'm sure the venue identifies as sold out‚" one commenter said. "He can imagine his audience like he imagines his gender‚" another user quipped. "Surprisingly‚ the prancing troonery of this modern minstrel show doesn’t have an enormous offline following‚" another commenter noted. "Very mysterious." "He can pretend it’s a huge crowd‚ just like he pretends he’s a girl‚" another user observed. "The people in the audience are as imaginary as the genders they come up with‚" another commenter stated. "Everyone heard they were only serving Bud Light‚" another user joked. "Even the kids know he’s a con artist‚" another commenter wrote. 'It feels fun to be sexy' Mulvaney — a biological male who identifies as female and made one of Forbes' "30 Under 30" lists last month — led the audience in a school chant before sitting down‚ the Daily Collegian reported. Mulvaney discussed having “a hard six months” due to backlash after Bud Light used the trans influencer to promote the beer brand earlier this year‚ the Collegian noted. “I realized that these companies were capitalizing on my identity and transness in a way that was really ugly‚" Mulvaney said‚ according to the paper. "I was putting my energy and identity into situations that were not safe for me or for the [trans] community.” Mulvaney also talked about trying new clothing‚ the paper said: “It feels fun to be sexy and love my body for the first time because I’m wearing it for myself and not anyone else." Student Naskara Sharma told the Collegian she was in awe of Mulvaney’s poise and composure throughout the night: “She’s absolutely gorgeous‚ and it was just so incredible to hear how far she’s come‚ and how she’s been able to stay so positive even through all the negativity."The Daily Wire said Mulvaney typically charges $40‚000 for a speaking engagement but that it's unclear if Mulvaney and the Student Programming Association worked out a less pricey payment for the event. The Daily Mail said student fees covered the Mulvaney speech at Penn State. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Academics‚ woke organizations‚ and liberal publications are promoting a social engineering scheme aimed at inhibiting travel and limiting freedom in the name of fighting the specter of anthropogenic climate change. CNN was among the latest outfits to recycle the claim that so-called carbon passports have become a necessity. From COVID to climate Over the course of the pandemic‚ numerous Western nations introduced or considered introducing vaccine passports — supposedly secure digital immunity certifications required for travel and admission to various events‚ businesses‚ and facilities. Critics warned that besides invading citizens' privacy‚ trampling their mobility rights‚ and serving to maximize the number of veins opened to profitable vaccines‚ there would also be "function creep" with the medical passports. Financial Post columnist Terence Corcoran noted in September 2021‚ "Somewhere deep in the cranium of the climate intelligentsia a seed was planted to produce the florid idea that the global COVID-19 virus could serve as inspiration for humankind to once and for all tackle the looming climate crisis." Corcoran highlighted how Bloomberg chairman and former Bank of England governor Mark Carney wrote in his then-new book "Value(s): Building a Better World for All‚" that "if we come together to meet the biggest challenges in medical biology‚ so too can we come together to meet the challenges of climate physics and the forces driving inequality." Carney was evidently not alone in his thinking. 220 medical journals uniformly published the same editorial titled‚ "Call for emergency action to limit global temperature increases‚ restore biodiversity‚ and protect health." The editorial stated‚ "Many governments met the threat of the COVID-19 pandemic with unprecedented funding. The environmental crisis demands a similar emergency response." "Governments must intervene to support the redesign of transport systems‚ cities‚ production and distribution of food‚ markets for financial investments‚ health systems‚ and much more‚" continued the cabal of health professionals. "Global co-ordination is needed to ensure that the rush for cleaner technologies does not come at the cost of more environmental destruction and human exploitation." A "perspective" paper published in the journal Nature Sustainability made explicit what various climate alarmists flying back and forth from the U.N.'s yearly Climate Change Conference had in mind. "Personal carbon allowances (PCAs) could play a role in achieving ambitious climate mitigation targets‚" wrote a team comprising British‚ European and Israeli activists. "We argue that recent advances in AI for sustainable development‚ together with the need for a low-carbon recovery from the COVID-19 crisis‚ open a new window of opportunity for PCAs." The multinational team concluded‚ "PCAs could be trialed in selected climate-conscious technologically advanced countries." Carbon passports Now‚ years later‚ there appears to be a concerted effort under way with predictions and excuses to prime Westerners for carbon passports. CNN‚ for instance‚ recently recycled an article from the Conversation titled‚ "It's time to limit how often we can travel abroad — 'carbon passports' may be the answer." The article‚ penned by a pronoun-providing Ph.D .candidate at Leeds Beckett University‚ begins with criticism of the tourism industry's apparent return to normal in the wake of the pandemic‚ suggesting that "there's concern that a return to the status quo is already showing dire environmental and social consequences." Despite evidence that human error and arson are often to blame‚ the article cited recent wildfires as evidence climate change is a growing problem‚ then suggested tourism is partly to blame. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency‚ 29% of greenhouse gas emissions in 2021 came from transportation‚ including planes‚ trains‚ and automobiles. The year prior to the pandemic‚ the figure was 33%. The article highlights a possible remedy detailed in a 2023 report from Intrepid‚ a travel company that claims to be ethical. The report‚ which has been taken up by various travel zines‚ claims that a "personal carbon emissions limit will become the new normal as policy and people's values drive an era of great change." Martin Raymond‚ co-founder of the Future Laboratory‚ a consultancy outfit‚ said‚ "On our current trajectory‚ we can expect a pushback against the frequency with which individuals can travel‚ with carbon passports set to change the tourism landscape." The report claims that unnamed experts "suggest that individuals should currently limit their carbon emissions to 2.3 tonnes each year – the equivalent of taking a round-trip from Rio de Janeiro‚ Brazil‚ to Riyadh‚ Saudi Arabia. However‚ the average carbon footprint in the US is 16 tonnes per person per year." As a point of comparison‚ Biden climate czar John Kerry's flights around the world promoting a green future reportedly generated 9.54 million pounds or 4‚329 tonnes of carbon just between March 2021 and July 2022. A personal carbon emissions limit would apparently ensure that those without the blessing of the government or the ability to pay off a substantial fine would be prohibited from travel deemed excessive or unnecessary. "By 2040‚ it will be unusual to see members of Generation Alpha without a carbon-footprint tracker on their smartphones. Every Uber ride‚ plane journey‚ and trip to the supermarket will be logged in their devices‚ noting their carbon footprint in real time‚" said the report. While the Intrepid report predicted that carbon passports might be enforced by 2040‚ the Conversation article recycled by CNN appeared more hopeful‚ noting that "our travel habits may already be on the verge of change." This optimism over the imminence of vaccine passport rollouts was informed by recent European initiatives‚ such as the move to axe short-haul flights and impose taxes dissuading the working and middle classes from flying. The author of the article threatened‚ "Holidaymakers should prepare to change their travel habits now‚ before this change is forced upon them." While such threats issued by junior scholars in leftist publications may be idle‚ there has been statist interst in such schemes. For instance‚ the British government has previously considered implementing personal carbon trading and placing a "ceiling on the carbon available for consumption‚ rather than seeking to reduce demand." The Biden administration has not proposed climate passports but recently noted in an EPA report that "achieving a sustainable transportation future will require implementing bold changes and different sets of solutions to address unique challenges in different locations and across all travel modes and applications." Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The government doesn’t care about the border as much as it cares about crypto. The Treasury Department has launched a new Strike Force that’s masquerading as a way to crack down on illicit funds behind fentanyl trafficking. However‚ it’s really meant to crack down on money laundering networks — especially those utilizing cryptocurrency. The Strike Force will be led by the Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence and IRS Criminal Investigation. Glenn doesn’t think this story should slide under the radar as it’s an especially shady move‚ considering the flow of fentanyl could be greatly reduced if the government would simply close the open southern border. Stu Burguiere agrees‚ noting that the move “seems like a money grab by the federal government.” “You need a central bank digital currency that you can turn off for purchases of these bad things. That way you could stop people from doing all these naughty things‚” Stu mocks‚ adding that it’s like a “department of pre-crime.” Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen praised the move in a statement on Monday. She noted that the “new Strike Force will allow us to bring the Department’s unrivaled expertise in fighting financial crime” and that the “treasury will use every bit of every tool at it’s disposal to disrupt the ability of drug traffickers to pedal this poison.” Want more from Glenn Beck?To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling‚ thought-provoking analysis‚ and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos‚ subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America‚ defend the Constitution‚ and live the American dream.

A ban on sales of handguns to 18- to 20-year-olds was denied by a federal judge‚ who deemed the ban "facially unconstitutional" and inconsistent with traditional regulations.Judge Thomas Kleeh‚ chief judge of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia‚ gave a detailed but overall simple rejection of the ban in a 40-page decision.The lawsuit was brought forth by the Second Amendment Foundation and the West Virginia Citizens Defense League. Defendants in the case were the Bureau of Alcohol‚ Tobacco‚ Firearms and Explosives‚ along with Attorney General Merrick Garland.According to SCNR‚ Judge Kleeh relied heavily on the 2022 ruling in the New York State Rifle &; Pistol Assoc.‚ Inc. v Bruen case. That case overturned a New York gun control law that required gun owners seeking a concealed carry license for handguns to demonstrate a "proper cause" to do so.Kleeh explained that the defendants did not present any historical evidence of weapons bans based on age in the country's history."Defendants generally miss the point and Plaintiffs’ injury is clear. Plaintiffs do not dispute that 18-to-20-year-olds who are law-abiding adults and not otherwise banned from firearm possession are not prohibited from possessing handguns‚" he noted. "Defendants have not presented any evidence of age-based restrictions on the purchase or sale of firearms from before or at the founding or during the early republic. Defendants have likewise failed to offer evidence of similar regulation between then and 1791 or in a relevant timeframe thereafter. For that reason alone‚ defendants have failed to meet the burden imposed by Bruen."A "means-end scrutiny" was also used to justify the gun control law‚ but Kleeh noted that the state cannot supersede an individual's constitutional right simply because it believes public safety is more important. Means-end scrutiny typically means that a federal court seeks to establish whether or not a proposed government protection justifies the methods used to implement that protection."To justify its regulation‚ the government may not simply posit that the regulation promotes an important interest. Rather‚ the government must demonstrate that the regulation is consistent with this Nation’s historical tradition of firearm regulation‚" the Bruen case stated.Perhaps the simplest part of the ruling was the statement that the age group in question (18- to 20-year-olds) should be afforded the same Second Amendment rights as other adults. The ruling concluded that "18-to-20-year-old law abiding citizens are part of 'the people' whom the Second Amendment protects."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Harvard president Claudine Gay is trying to save face after not saying Harvard's policies condemn students who call for a genocide of the Jewish people.Appearing before the House Education and Workforce Committee on Tuesday‚ Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) asked Gay if students who call for a genocide of Jews violates Harvard's policies. Despite the straightforward question‚ Gay would say only that such speech is "at odds with the values of Harvard‚" but she refused to condemn it outright as violating Harvard's code of conduct. — (@) The outrage against Gay was swift‚ and she attempted to quell the backlash with a clarifying statement on Wednesday."There are some who have confused a right to free expression with the idea that Harvard will condone calls for violence against Jewish students‚" Gay said. "Let me be clear: Calls for violence or genocide against the Jewish community‚ or any religious or ethnic group are vile‚ they have no place at Harvard‚ and those who threaten our Jewish students will be held to account."The statement went viral but did little to repair the damage she had caused. Not only did people demand she immediately resign‚ but they questioned the sincerity of the statement because it was made in response to backlash — not under oath before Congress. "Let me be clear. No one is confused about this desperate attempt at cleaning up your pathetic antisemitic answers yesterday. You cannot undo the moral depravity and shame. And everyone in the world knows it‚" Stefanik responded."Words not spoken YESTERDAY‚ on the record‚ on camera‚ when given ample opportunity‚" CNN anchor Bianna Golodryga noted."'Let me be clear' — really? You had a whole day yesterday before the entire nation to be 'clear.' And you failed spectacularly! You think a single tweet‚ not subject to cross-examination or other follow up inquiry‚ fixes this? You are insulting the entire country!" former U.S. Ambassador to Israel David Friedman responded."President Claudine‚ Why didn’t you say that yesterday? Or better yet on October 7th?" Israeli author Hen Mazzig asked."As a Harvard alum‚ I say this with all due respect: F*@k Harvard!" Israeli journalist and Harvard alum Caroline Glick responded."You should have said this yesterday‚ live‚ in-person and on camera. Not today‚ after your PR firm told you you needed to clean it up. It’s too late now. It’s not credible‚" former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer‚ who is Jewish‚ responded."Then why didn’t you say this during your Congressional hearing yesterday?! STEP DOWN. You are a failure‚" StopAntisemitism‚ a non-profit organization‚ asked."Why was Claudine Gay unable to say this at the hearing and it took universal outrage and condemnation for you to issue this clarification?" human rights lawyer Arsen Ostrovsky asked.Even the White House condemned Gay and the other university presidents who testified on Tuesday and waffled on lay-up questions about anti-Semitism."It's unbelievable that this needs to be said: calls for genocide are monstrous and antithetical to everything we represent as a country‚" White House spokesman Andrew Bates said in a statement."Any statements that advocate for the systematic murder of Jews are dangerous and revolting — and we should all stand firmly against them‚ on the side of human dignity and the most basic values that unite us as Americans‚" he added.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Our series continues with novelty songs‚ a German driving song‚ and one from a movie that scared the daylights out of us. Everybody was Kung Fu Fighting... The post 11 Surprising 1970s Radio Hits (Part 4) appeared first on Best Classic Bands.