The Michigan secretary of state is investigating the PAC Elon Musk helped fund. The PAC supports Donald Trump. No legal experts could find any violations of state laws. There is no predicate. In other words, they are fishing for a crime. Show me the man, and I’ll show you the crime. Her investigation is based […] The post MI Secretary of State Investigating Musk PAC Without a Predicate appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

David Axelrod, former President Barack Obama’s chief campaign strategist, says the presidential race between Harris and former President Donald Trump remains “Trump’s race to lose.” “There’s a lot of irrational exuberance on the Democratic side of the aisle right now because there was despair for some period of time about what November was going to […] The post Obama Strategist: “Irrational Exuberance” Around Kamala appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Kamala Harris is pretending she no longer stands for the far-left views she espoused for years, some as late as this year. In some cases, she flat-out lies, especially about her role on the border. California Sen. Laphonza Butler claims she is learning. Kamala is nearly 60, and she’s finally getting her political views together? […] The post Kamala’s Flip Flopping Because She’s Human, Learns Every Day appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Former President Donald Trump said over the weekend that if he wins the presidential election this fall that he will unleash America’s energy production. Trump made the remarks during a pre-taped interview that aired Sunday on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures” with host Maria Bartiromo. “We’re going to get energy way down. Drill, baby, drill,” he said. “We have more energy — we have more liquid gold, as I call it, under our feet than Saudi Arabia, than Russia, than anybody. We’re going to be energy-dominant, we’re going to make a fortune, we’re going to supply it all over Europe, all over the world. We’re going to be double and triple what they’re doing. We’re going to have tremendous energy, and we’re going to lower our prices of energy.” “Do you know people in New England — they pay some of the highest prices in the world because we don’t have a pipeline, because New York won’t let a pipeline go through a very poor section of New York,” he continued. WATCH THE TRAILER FOR ‘AM I RACIST?’ — A MATT WALSH COMEDY ON DEI He added that he wanted to bring back tariffs because he believes that they will protect the U.S. auto industry. “Those people in Michigan that love me and that I love, and they’re going to give us a victory because their auto industry won’t exist in two years, if she [Harris] gets elected — China is going to make, and other countries are going to make, all the cars. They’re building some of the biggest auto plants,” he said. “By the way, when you add it all up, including the taxes and everything else, we’re going to create jobs like you’ve never created before. If you look at auto manufacturing, it’s down 64% from its high number of jobs and everything else. But we used to be the world manufacturer, and every year it gets eaten away, and a big factor is Mexico. Mexico stole 32% of our auto manufacturing. We’re going to say, ‘You want to do that? We’re putting tariffs on your cars coming in.'” WATCH:

Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), the former speaker of the House of Representatives, suggested during an interview over the weekend that President Joe Biden should be added to Mount Rushmore. Pelosi made the remarks during an interview that aired Sunday on CBS News’ “Sunday Morning” where she discussed a wide range of issues. The clip comes after the failed president was forced drop out of the presidential race against former President Donald Trump because his poll numbers plummeted after he showed serious signs of cognitive impairment during June’s presidential debate. “So he was in a good place to make whatever decision, at the top of his game,” Pelosi said about Biden’s decision to drop out of the race. “Such a consequential president of the United States, a Mount Rushmore kind of president of the United States,” she continued. WATCH THE TRAILER FOR ‘AM I RACIST?’ — A MATT WALSH COMEDY ON DEI Left-wing journalist Leslie Stahl was surprised by Pelosi’s comment and had to check if Pelosi was serious about what she had said. “Lincoln and Joe Biden?” Stahl asked. “But you’ve got Teddy Roosevelt up there and he’s wonderful,” Pelosi said. “I don’t say take him down, but you can add Biden.” WATCH: WATCH: Nancy Pelosi just proposed that “such a consequential President” as Joe Biden should be added to Mt. Rushmore! pic.twitter.com/jXUz5T71KG — TV News Now (@TVNewsNow) August 4, 2024

BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM In an unprecedented move, G20 finance ministers agreed to levy a wealth tax on the super-rich. The tax, which may raise over €230 billion ($248.4 billion) per year, is intended to address critical global challenges such as climate change and poverty. A landmark agreement amid skepticism The notion emerged during a conference in Rio de Janeiro of the world’s top economies’ treasury ministers and central bankers. A joint statement issued last Friday indicated that all member countries had committed to “engage cooperatively to ensure that ultra-high-net-worth individuals are effectively taxed.” Despite the apparent unity, there are still considerable differences over the plan’s practicality. Questions remain concerning who would monitor its implementation and how such a fee will be imposed. Some governments privately dispute the plan’s chances for success. Brazil leads the initiative Brazil has been at the forefront of promoting the wealth tax. President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has prioritized climate change and poverty reduction, as his country hosts this year’s G20 meetings and the COP30 UN climate conference in 2025. Brazil commissioned a survey by French economist Gabriel Zucman, which revealed that billionaires presently pay only 0.3 percent of their wealth in taxes. Lula advocates for a minimum 2 percent tax on the world’s top 3,000 billionaires, which could generate between €184 billion and €230 billion annually. According to the paper, this cash could considerably benefit public services like education and healthcare, as well as efforts to address climate change. Despite the theoretical agreement, certain countries, especially Germany and the United States, have raised doubts. US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen stated that the US does not “see the need or really think it’s desirable to try to negotiate a global agreement on that.” Experts worry that without a worldwide agreement, some countries may become tax havens for the ultra-rich. In contrast, countries like France, Spain, South Africa, Colombia, and the African Union support the plan. Zucman admitted that it is early for governments to fully support his approach, but appreciated the “consensus among G20 countries that the way we tax the super-rich must be fixed.” Environmental campaigner support Environmentalists have welcomed the consensus, hoping that the funds raised by this tax will help to address the climate catastrophe. Camila Jardim, an international politics specialist for Greenpeace Brazil, commented, “We frequently hear that there is insufficient funding to address the climate catastrophe, which is expected to cost trillions of dollars per year. However, taxing the ultra-wealthy can begin to demonstrate that there is more than enough money; it simply needs to be channeled away from destruction. Susana Ruiz, Oxfam International’s tax policy head, praised the deal as “serious global progress” in international tax cooperation. She pointed out: “Finally, the richest people are being told they can’t game the tax system or avoid paying their fair share.” Moving forward While the G20’s agreement on a wealth tax is a huge step forward, the difficulty is to turn this theoretical consensus into a practical reality. As the world grapples with inequality and climate change, the potential impact of such a tax might be dramatic, assuming the practical challenges are addressed.The post G20 nations support Brazil’s ‘super-rich’ tax proposal to fight climate change and poverty first appeared on The Optimist Daily: Making Solutions the News.

BY THE OPTIMIST DAILY EDITORIAL TEAM Experts are discovering novel and surprising ways to help humans live longer in the never-ending quest for longevity. One such insight is the importance of gratitude. A recent study of over 50,000 older women discovered that those who felt more grateful had a considerably lower probability of dying within the next three years. This research shows that gratitude may be more than just a feel-good emotion; it could be the secret to living a longer, healthier life. Discovering the power of gratitude Gratitude has long been recognized for its power to improve our mood and overall well-being. On top of those benefits, it now seems like it plays a significant role in extending our lifespan. Joel Wong, a professor of counseling psychology at Indiana University who was not involved in the study, stated, “It’s an exciting study. It supports the idea that gratitude is not only good for your mental health but also for living a longer life.” The science of gratitude and health Ying Chen of Harvard University’s Human Flourishing Program led the current study, which used data from the Nurses’ Health Study, a long-term effort that has been studying the health of thousands of American women since 1976. In 2016, participants were asked to score their sense of gratitude. Their responses were then examined to determine whether there was a correlation with longevity. The results were stunning. Women with the greatest gratitude scores were 29 percent less likely to die in the next three years than those with the lowest values. This correlation remained even after controlling for age, marital status, social and religious activity, and overall health. Even after accounting for particular health concerns such as heart disease, stroke, cancer, and diabetes, the most thankful women had a 27 percent decreased risk of dying. Even after controlling for lifestyle characteristics such as smoking, drinking, exercise, body mass index, and diet quality, the most grateful women had a 21 percent decreased chance of dying. While these findings are compelling, it’s worth noting that the study demonstrates correlation rather than causality. However, it opens up fascinating new avenues for future research and practical applications in health and well-being. Practical ways to develop gratitude Gratitude is a powerful feeling that may be nourished and deepened. Sonja Lyubomirsky, an experimental social psychologist at UC Riverside, emphasizes, “Gratitude is a skill that you can build.” Here are some simple strategies to foster appreciation in your daily life: 1. Keep a gratitude journal: Every day, write down three things you are grateful for. This simple technique might help you change your attention from what is wrong to what is right in your life. 2. Express your appreciation to others: Write thank-you notes or letters to those who have made a difference in your life. Delivering these words in person can be especially impactful. 3. Reflect on positive experiences: Take a few minutes each day to reflect on wonderful events and things you’re grateful for. This can help to strengthen pleasant feelings and minimize stress. 4. Practice mindfulness: Mindfulness meditation can help you be present and grateful in the moment. Incorporating appreciation into your mindfulness practice can increase its effectiveness. 5. Perform acts of kindness: Serving others can increase sentiments of gratitude. Volunteer your time or do tiny acts of kindness to develop a thankful heart. The outlook for gratitude and longevity The latest findings add to an expanding body of evidence indicating that thankfulness has several health advantages. People who practice thankfulness regularly have better cardiovascular health, lower levels of inflammation, and decreased cholesterol levels. They are also more likely to practice healthy habits such as frequent exercise, a balanced diet, and adequate sleep. Furthermore, gratitude is linked to decreased rates of sadness, increased social support, and a stronger feeling of purpose—all of which are associated with longer life. Incorporating gratitude into your daily routine will not only improve your emotional and physical health, but it may also help you live longer. Source study: JAMA Psychiatry—Gratitude and mortality among older US female nursesThe post Be grateful, live longer—how gratitude boosts longevity and well-being first appeared on The Optimist Daily: Making Solutions the News.

'People in this country have a right to be safe'

A 47-year-old paralyzed man hopes to become the first person to cycle the entire 1,000-mile length of Britain using a motorized bike controlled by his chin. Andy Walker set off on his epic voyage from Lands End today, in a specially made quad-cycle with the goal of arriving at John O’Groats in two weeks—and he’s […] The post Paralyzed Man Sets Off to Cycle Entire Length of Britain on a Motorized Bike Controlled by His Chin appeared first on Good News Network.

The Regime Media continue to do their level best to boost Kamalamania into the atmosphere. On ABC This Week, senior campaign correspondent Rachel Scott openly salivated over the prospects of a Harris-Trump debate. Watch as Scott rehashes the campaign’s “prosecutor vs. felon” narrative, and speculates over whether Trump will even debate Harris: ABC THIS WEEK 8/4/2024 9:46 AM SUSAN PAGE: I moderated the last debate she did in 2020. The vice presidential debate. She is a good debater. She is confident. She uses a little humor. She made Mike Pence be quiet, which was something I really struggled to do, and she comes across in that debate as a prosecutor, and that is a good message for her. GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: That seems to be her sweet spot. RACHEL SCOTT: Yeah, and imagine that on the debate stage where you have a prosecutor possibly facing off against someone who has just been convicted, right? And that's the sort of image that of course, Democrats are hoping that they can actually have on the debate stage, but yes, and thinking back to her taking on President Biden when they were running against each other in the Democratic primary. Democrats see her as someone who can thrive potentially on the debate stage. The question is, does it actually happen? STEPHANOPOULOS: We will see, Thank you all for coming in. We’ll be right back. “Imagine that”, Scott says. One imagines the Regime Media cohort feeling onanistic pleasure at the idea of Harris taking down Trump in a debate like it’s the last minute of a Law & Order episode. A political debate is a wholly different proposition from a criminal prosecution, where defendants don’t often directly rebut their prosecutors. Here, Scott openly indulges her imaginations.  Recall that it was Scott that launched into a tirade to open former President Donald Trump’s forum at the National Association of Black Journalists’ convention in Chicago. As our colleague Alex Christy noted during his recap of the event, Scott kicked off the event by asking: “You have told four congresswomen of color, who are American citizens, to go back to where they came from. You have used words like 'animal' and 'rabid' to describe black attorneys. You attack black journalists, calling them 'a loser' saying the questions that they asked are, quote, “stupid and racist.” You've had dinner with a white supremacist at your Mar-a-Lago resort. So, my question, sir, now that you are asking black supporters to vote for you, why should black voters trust you after you have used language like that?” This is clearly the advancement of narrative, as was Scott’s gross swooning over Prosecutor Harris. This wasn’t the only time during the panel segment that Scott did that, either.  Earlier, @RachelVScott praised the “nuance” of Kamala Harris: “It has been really notable for us reporters who have picked up on the nuance about how she has responded to some of these attacks, questioning her racial identity....putting it back on Donald Trump...” #ThisWeek pic.twitter.com/MMXwH5ZvwG — Brent Baker ?? ?? (@BrentHBaker) August 4, 2024 Never mind all the swooning over “nuance” and Harris’ response: what pivot to the issues is Scott even talking about here, other than abortion and maybe price controls?  As is Mary Bruce to Joe Biden, so is Rachel Scott to Kamala Harris. The most Democrat-sycophantic network has a new chief apple polisher in town.