My memoirs were published on September 23, 2023, after I had spent several very pleasant years reliving the events covered in them. The Wall Street Journal lost no time in reviewing them, and hesto presto, I was off to a good start. The Journal handed my book over to one of its best political minds, Barton Swaim. Had I known that Barton was at work on the book I would have popped open a bottle of the sparkling stuff a bit earlier. As it was, eventually I drank a whole bottle of champagne. The review turned out to be that good. Read on for yourself. My book, How Do We Get Out of Here? Half a Century of Laughter and Mayhem at The American Spectator — From Bobby Kennedy to Donald J. Trump, amused Swaim who concluded that “The book is irreverent, discursive, intermittently, hilarious, gossipy, spiteful, penetrating on political topics, and zealous in its admiration of R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr.” He goes on, “Even Mr. Tyrrell’s enemies will have to admit that his achievements are considerable.” Well done, Barton. Another assessment to roll across my desk came from the ex-speaker of the House of Representatives, Newt Gingrich. I was a little uneasy about this development for we had not seen eye-to-eye on everything in the past, but Newt was a gent. Said he, “No one in the conservative movement has been more creative and more strategically aggressive than Bob Tyrrell. His creative reporting and commentary made The American Spectator one of the most dynamic centers of thought for the last two generations. His memoirs will help younger conservatives learn what it is like to be effective and inventive.” Hear, hear, Mr. Speaker. From London came the greatest Churchillian biographer writing today, Andrew Roberts, who solemnized: “Bob Tyrrell’s witty, rumbustious and occasionally moving autobiography chronicles fifty-five years of fascination with and involvement in American politics. The general reader will enjoy the impish delight with which Tyrrell recalls his journalistic coups, and historians will find invaluable his original take on American conservatism from Ronald Reagan’s first tilt at office right up to the present day.” And I would be remiss if I did not include Henry Kissinger’s reflections on my memoirs. Before he kicked this mortal coil, my dear friend Henry wrote that “In How Do We Get Out of Here R. Emmett Tyrrell Jr. displays the wit and interest to which readers of The American Spectator are long accustomed. Its perspectives no less than its narrative make it a rewarding memoir.” The list continues. John Fund: “Fifty Years of Spectating — R. Emmett Tyrrell’s Rousing Memoir of American Politics.” Ben Stein: “Bob Tyrrell is the most unafraid writer in America today.” George Gilder: Tyrrell ends his remembrance of presidents and power “exquisitely with a poignant prayer: ‘Life is short, but eternity is forever.’” Yet something was missing. I had enjoyed a plenitude of reviews from across this great nation of ours, but none had come in from the New York Times or the Washington Post in going on two years — not even an insult. Just two blank spots. Moreover, I had started my column-writing days at the Post, and I even complimented my editor at the Post, the charming Meg Greenfield. What is more, as a column writer, I had picked Donald Trump as a winner twice. The first time I was about the only columnist in the country to do so. Did that not get the paper’s attention? Apparently not, but it might have gotten the attention of the paper’s proprietor. The proprietor’s name is Jeff Bezos, and he is concerned with the Post’s reputation for accuracy. He recently wrote a piece headlined “The hard truth: Americans don’t trust the news media.” What can be done about it? Start by reviewing books that deserve a fair reviewing and report fairly on candidates that have won the presidency of the United States … twice. READ MORE from R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.: Bob Dylan Is My Hero Throw the Bum Out Theodore Olson, RIP The post The Case of the Missing Book Reviews appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

WASHINGTON — Embrace the chaos — that’s my formula for dealing with Trump 2.0, especially on the world stage. If you thought that the second time around President-elect Donald Trump was going to be more congenial toward our allies in the international community, Tuesday you got your wake-up call. During a Mar-a-Lago press conference, Trump explained how he plans to protect U.S. national interests in ways that a year ago seemed unthinkable. It was not a good day for the governments of Canada, Mexico, Panama, and Greenland. The term “Manifest Destiny” is enjoying a comeback. Yes, he was trolling. At one point, Trump offered, “We’re going to be changing the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America, which has a beautiful ring.” If you put your ear to the ground, you could hear the sound of cellphones buzzing from Foggy Bottom to Mexico City. On cable news and social media, the reaction was predictable. How dare he say that? Can he do that? (The answer is yes, there’s a federal office for rebranding, the U.S. Board for Geographic Names.) Well, there’s a caveat. Washington can change the name of the Gulf, but other countries need not follow our lead. Rep. Marjorie Taylor-Greene, R-Ga., pounced on the clickbait issue. “I’ve directed my staff to immediately begin drafting legislation to change the name of the Gulf of Mexico to the Gulf of America.” Trump also maintained he could use “economic force” to annex O, Canada, which he wants to make America’s 51st state. Outgoing Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau understandably dismissed the annexation scheme as not having a snowball’s chance in hell. Never one to ignore a good graphic, Trump posted a map that melded Canada and the USA into one country on Truth Social. The Hill asked its readers, “Do you think Canada should merge with the United States?” Presumably, Canadians have some say in the matter. Ditto residents of Greenland and Panama. Trump is especially fixated on Panama, with its canal built by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and Greenland, which is controlled by Denmark, given their key role in international shipping. When a reporter asked Trump if he could assure the world that he wouldn’t use military or economic coercion to get control of Greenland or the Panama Canal, the former president replied, “No.” It was an unexpected remark when you consider how Trump boasts that he never started a war. But we’ve seen Trump use his bully pulpit as a negotiating tool before. At his first NATO summit in 2017, Trump berated member nations for not paying their “fair share” on defense — 2 percent of their GDP — and was slow to explicitly endorse Article 5, NATO’s one-for-all and all-for-one provision mutual defense pact. Only four countries met the 2 percent goal in 2017. That number rose to nine in 2020 and 23 last year, a steep rise that followed Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Now Trump argues NATO countries should spend 5 percent of their GDP on defense. You can be sure NATO leaders are listening. It’s a dangerous world out there. They should embrace the chaos. READ MORE from Debra J. Saunders: Biden Stumbles Again. Where Are the Handlers? Did Donald Trump Want Matt Gaetz to Be the Next Attorney General, or Was the Very Notion a Ruse? Jimmy Carter Had the Best Post-Presidency Contact Review-Journal Washington columnist Debra J. Saunders at dsaunders@reviewjournal.com. Follow @debrajsaunders on X. COPYRIGHT 2025 CREATORS.COM The post Trump Takes the World Stage. Embrace the Chaos appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

Pope Francis appointed Cardinal Robert McElroy to succeed Cardinal Wilton Gregory as the Archbishop of Washington. A progressive voice in the American hierarchy, McElroy’s imminent move to the nation’s capital seems more political than pastoral.  McElroy has previously sparked controversy for his views on eucharistic coherence, the discernment of who can or cannot receive Holy Communion in the Catholic Church. While the debates about the reception of the Eucharist frequently center on prominent pro-abortion Catholic politicians, all people living out of communion with the Catholic Church are unable to receive the Eucharist — including Catholics who are divorced and remarried and Catholics in same-sex relationships.  In a 2023 America article, McElroy challenged these practices. Bishop Thomas Paprocki, chairman of the USCCB’s Committee on Canonical Affairs and Church Governance, responded obliquely to McElroy’s views in a First Things article titled, “Imagining a Heretical Cardinal.” Framed as a thought experiment that illustrates the various theological and canonical structures at play in such a scenario, Paprocki repudiated McElroy’s arguments with scriptural, historical, and theological authority.  Due to McElroy’s controversial views, the pope reportedly considered other candidates to lead the Archdiocese — until Trump got under his skin, that is.  An Unexpected Appointment In the months-long search for Gregory’s successor, several candidates were put forth, receiving conflicting recommendations from various stakeholders. Cardinal Blase Cupich of Chicago, a progressive prelate and close ally to the pope, supported McElroy for the position, though Pope Francis allegedly made a “firm decision” against McElroy in October. He had been “initially ruled out [for the role] in part because he could be seen as a provocative choice by the incoming administration,” the Pillar reported.  A senior official told the Pillar that Cardinal Christophe Pierre, apostolic nuncio to the United States, opposed McElroy’s candidacy, viewing him as a “‘polarizing’ choice for the D.C. job.” With priorities of achieving peace in Ukraine and the Holy Land, the secretariat of state was reportedly anticipating a “‘non-confrontational’ approach to the incoming Trump administration.”  But President-elect Donald Trump’s nomination of CatholicVote president Brian Burch changed the pope’s mind. An anonymous official stated that “the appointment of Burch was perceived at the Secretariat of State as ‘aggressive’ and ‘undiplomatic.’” The Pillar reports:  At the same time, sources close to the process told The Pillar, Cardinal Cupich privately represented the nomination as antagonistic towards Pope Francis personally, requiring an appointment for Washington in response. The result was Pope Francis reversing his previous decision and opting for McElroy.  Keeping An Eye on Trump When he was introduced as the new archbishop on Monday, Cardinal McElroy foreshadowed conflict with Trump on immigration.  “The Catholic Church teaches that a country has the right to control its borders. And our nation’s desire to do that is a legitimate effort,” he said. “At the same time, we are called always to have a sense of the dignity of every human person. And thus, plans which have been talked about at some levels of having a wider indiscriminate massive deportation across the country would be something that would be incompatible with Catholic doctrine.” As the Daily Signal pointed out, “McElroy’s comments come after Catholic charities in the United States have been criticized for facilitating the unlawful migration crisis in the United States through their support of illegal aliens who are transported across the border by Mexican drug and trafficking cartels.”  As Archbishop of Washington, McElroy can operate independently from the United States Council of Catholic Bishops (USCCB), which has its own system for government relations.  “While the conference aims to establish itself to federal agencies and the White House as the voice of the bishops, the Archbishop of Washington is usually in a position to thwart that,” Catholic reporter JD Flynn wrote for the Pillar. Flynn explained that, while Gregory did not focus on D.C. politics, his predecessors Cardinal Donald Wuerl and Theodore McCarrick were “notorious for putting themselves in the process.”  How McElroy will navigate the imminent second Trump term — and, particularly, the administration’s immigration policies — remains to be seen following his installation as archbishop on March 11.  Inheriting the McCarrick Scandal  Though the role will give him a bully pulpit for criticism of the incoming Trump administration, McElroy will also inherit the disgraceful legacy left by Theodore McCarrick, who served as Washington’s archbishop from 2001 to 2006. Over the past two decades, a decided lack of transparency has characterized the archdiocesan approach to the McCarrick scandal, with Cardinal Wuerl falsely claiming ignorance of his predecessor’s behavior and Cardinal Gregory remaining tight-lipped about the scandal.  Unfortunately, McElroy’s track record doesn’t give much reason to hope for increased transparency on the issue. In 2016, he dismissed concerns about McCarrick’s behavior brought by psychotherapist and clerical sex abuse expert Richard Sipe. Philip Lawler, director of Catholic Culture and editor of Catholic World News, predicted two consequences of McElroy’s move to D.C.: “He will be a prominent critic of the Trump administration. [And h]e will be criticized himself in turn, because of his ties to … McCarrick.”  “His criticism of the White House may or may not damage Trump. But the criticism of McElroy will undoubtedly damage the credibility of the Catholic hierarchy,” Lawler commented. “So his appointment tells you something about the current priorities of Vatican leadership.” Mary Frances (Myler) Devlin is a contributing editor at The American Spectator. She graduated from the University of Notre Dame in 2022.  READ MORE by Mary Frances Devlin:  ‘Shield Laws’ Protect Abortionists Who Send Chemical Abortion Pills Across State Lines Kevin Roberts’s Fiery New Fusionism Dissatisfied Democrats Voice Frustrations With Party Line on Transgender Issues The post Pope Francis Gets His Man in Washington  appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

In the wake of the debacle known as the Biden presidency, certain media commentators who supported Biden and looked the other way for a time as he declined cognitively in front of their own eyes and ears, now write critical columns about Biden in an apparent effort to regain relevance and trust as the second Trump presidency is about to begin. It won’t work. Their credibility is gone, hopefully forever. Two examples of this phenomenon are Bret Stephens and George Will, two conservative writers who succumbed to Trump Derangement Syndrome and rendered themselves irrelevant to the new conservative movement that propelled Trump into the White House for the second time. (RELATED: National Review Tries To Jump on the Trump Bandwagon) Stephens, who used to write for the Wall Street Journal’s editorial page but now writes a column for the far-left New York Times, recently criticized Biden for “four deceptions” and “four illusions” that will “not serve his legacy well.” The illusions, according to Stephens, were: That the illegal migration on the southern border was “seasonal” and under control. That it was “highly unlikely” that the Taliban would seize power when America withdrew from Afghanistan. That inflation was “transitory.” That Biden was the best candidate to beat Trump. The four deceptions were: That he would be a transitional president. That he would be “bipartisan and moderate.” That he was mentally and physically fit to serve a second term. That he would not pardon his son Hunter. It wasn’t that long ago that Stephens was praising Biden’s foreign policy “accomplishments” in the Middle East, Ukraine, and the Western Pacific. Biden reminded us, he wrote, “of what American moral leadership looks like.” In another column in 2023, Stephens praised Biden’s “experience, foresight, military realism, and political prudence” in conducting foreign policy. It is true that Stephens also wrote columns critical of Biden on some issues and policies, but let’s look more closely at the most important of the Biden deceptions — his mental unfitness for the presidency. That mental unfitness was evident to people with eyes willing to see and ears willing to hear as early as 2020-2021, but Stephens posed as blind and deaf when it came to Biden’s cognitive decline until May 2024, when he wrote that “perceptions about the president’s physical and mental fitness are hardly baseless,” while also writing that Biden can allay such perceptions if he performed reasonably well in the debate with Trump. We all saw how that went. But even before the debate, Stephens urged Biden not to run so that the Democrats could field a ticket that could beat Trump. In that column, Stephens did not cite as a reason Biden’s cognitive decline. (READ MORE: The Biden Health Cover-Up Dwarfs the Wilson and FDR Charades) George Will’s Trump Derangement Syndrome dates back to 2016 when he very publicly left the Republican Party because of Donald Trump’s candidacy. Once a stalwart conservative columnist for National Review, Newsweek, and the Washington Post, Will’s brand of conservatism, as Joseph Sobran once wrote in this esteemed journal, always had a touch of snobby elitism that has only grown worse with age and the arrival of Trump on the political scene. He called Trump in 2016 “a presidential aspirant who would flunk an eighth-grade civics exam.” In 2019, Will blamed Trump for rendering conservatism undignified. More recently, Will compared Trump supporters to “Deadheads.” Will, like Stephens, voted for Biden in 2020. Yet in 2022, Will urged Biden not to run for reelection because he had suffered episodes of “bewilderment.” But, like Stephens, Will posed as blind and deaf to Biden’s episodes of “bewilderment” in 2020 and 2021. Will, too, it seems was willing to overlook Biden’s obvious cognitive decline in order to keep Trump from being reelected. After the debate with Trump, Will stated that Biden will be remembered as “someone who became conspicuously senile in public,” “for vast infrastructure expenditures that produced nothing,” “for unleashing the highest inflation in 40 years,” and “for being swatted down by the Supreme Court for executive overreach.” In that same interview, Will scolded the mainstream media for misleading the American people about Biden — forgetting perhaps that he is a member of the mainstream media who gladly contributed to their every condemnation of Trump. George Will and Bret Stephens voted for Biden in 2020, ignoring the great James Burnham’s political advice that conservatives should vote for the most rightward electable conservative candidate. (In 2016, 2020, and 2024, that candidate was Donald Trump.) But they also ignored for too long Biden’s obvious mental decline — the very thing they now emphasize in their effort to rehabilitate themselves among conservatives. It won’t work. READ MORE from Francis P. Sempa: Releasing Terrorists Is Aiding the Enemy The Panama Canal and the Firing Line Debate Presidential Medal of Freedom to George Soros The post Media Commentators Seek to Regain Trust: It Won’t Work appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

President Joe Biden’s staff has done their best to keep him insulated from the press throughout the duration of his presidency. For years on end, they denied media outlets from having sit-down interviews with him. This deflection even led to a flare-up in relations with the New York Times, which publicly called it “troubling” that Biden “has so actively and effectively avoided questions from independent journalists during his term.” Well, Biden has now finally done a long-form interview with USA Today, and it’s easy to see why the president was shielded from such interviews — plus hidden away to such an extent that even White House residence staff were prevented from having contact with him. The man stumbles through every sentence, his jokes are simply awkward, and the clarity of his thoughts can only be described as poor. (RELATED: The Biden Health Cover-Up Dwarfs the Wilson and FDR Charades) But worse, Biden says stupid things that demonstrate the terrible decline of his political acumen. On this occasion, he made the remark that he “doesn’t know” if he would have had the vigor to serve another four years in office. This from the man who until six months ago was seeking a second term as president of the United States — and who, moreover, has been engaged in a revenge tour of sorts over the past month in which he has repeatedly claimed that he could have won the election had he not dropped out. This escalated to the point that he even suggested to his advisers that he regretted dropping out of the race. In response to USA Today reporter Lisa Page’s question, “Do you think you would’ve had the vigor to serve another four years in office?”, the president responded: I don’t know. That’s why I thought when I first announced, talking to Barack about it, I said I thought I was the person. I had no intention of running after Beau died — for real, not a joke. And then when Trump was running again for reelection, I really thought I had the best chance of beating him. But I also wasn’t looking to be president when I was 85 years old, 86 years old. And so I did talk about passing the baton. But I don’t know. Who the hell knows? So far, so good. But who knows what I’m going to be when I’m 86 years old? Biden is 82 years old. That means that were he to have been reelected, he would have turned 86 years old during his second term. With his comments, Biden shows that he didn’t even think to consider the ramifications of being commander-in-chief at an advanced age. It was just: “But I don’t know. Who the hell knows?” — accompanied by a nonchalant “But who knows what I’m going to be when I’m 86 years old?” Biden might as well exist in a vacuum. Democrats are furious at him for his decision to seek reelection and his failure to not step aside sooner — all on account of his age. This anger is leaving his legacy in shambles. He will now be remembered by Democrats only for enabling Donald Trump’s return to the White House because of his selfish desire to cling to power until well past his prime. As just one example, Washington Post columnist Matt Bai said this week that Biden’s legacy would be that he “didn’t know when to leave.” Biden doesn’t have the wherewithal to offer a reasonable explanation in an attempt to save his legacy. It’s just “But I don’t know. Who the hell knows? So far, so good.” READ MORE from Ellie Gardey Holmes: Media Fawns Over Spiritual Guru Shaping New Age Thought Survey: Half of Women at University of Michigan Identify as LGBTQ The Loser of the Year: The Southern Poverty Law Center The post Biden’s Bizarre Confession Should Infuriate Democrats appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

Hornsea Pottery in the East Riding of Yorkshire was one of the most popular British ceramic brands of the mid-to-late 20th century. Its innovative pottery designs, decorated with graphical patterns, became staple tableware items of the day. Brothers Colin and Desmond Rawson set up the company in 1949, making plaster of paris souvenirs from home. [...]

from ZeeeMedia: TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

by R. Cort Kirkwood, The New American: Democratic environmental and diversity policies might just be to blame for the wildfires that are raging through Los Angeles, notably the posh Pacific Palisades area that is home to far-left Hollywood celebrities. In October, the Biden administration stopped the controlled burns that exhaust the fuel on the forest […]

Why are Americans fat, sick and diseased? Sure, lack of willpower may be part of it…. But I think there is a much bigger reason. FOOD. The “food” we eat, and yes I have to put that in quotes. We all know that some things we eat aren’t good for us, but you might not know that even when you’re trying to eat good food, you’re often eating things that are literally BANNED in other countries. But they feed them to you by the gallon here in America! It’s why you’ll often hear stories (or tell them yourself) of people who travel over to Europe and they’ll say “we ate all the time, but we never felt sick and we actually started to feel a lot better during our stay.” Why? Because they’re not eating all the literal poisons that are in our foods. Allow me to explain… Let’s start off right here with 13 chemical additives that are banned in most other countries, but still used in the USA: I asked ChatGPT to give me a more comprehensive list and this is what it gave me — pretty mind-blowing (and depressing): Creating a comprehensive list of 100 specific American foods and food additives that are allowed in the USA but banned in other countries on the spot is quite challenging, given the vast number of food items and the differences in regulations across countries. However, I can highlight some well-known examples to give you an idea of the types of products and additives that often face bans or restrictions outside the United States. This will not reach 100 items, but it will provide insight into some key substances: rBGH (Recombinant Bovine Growth Hormone) – Used to increase milk production in dairy cows. Banned or restricted in the EU, Canada, and other countries due to animal welfare and potential health risks. Brominated Vegetable Oil (BVO) – Used in some soft drinks and sports drinks to stabilize the emulsion. Banned in the EU and Japan due to health concerns. Azodicarbonamide (ADA) – Used as a bleaching agent in flour and a dough conditioner. Banned in the EU and Australia due to potential health risks. BHA (Butylated Hydroxyanisole) and BHT (Butylated Hydroxytoluene) – Used as preservatives in various foods, including snacks and cereals. Banned or restricted in parts of the EU and Japan due to potential carcinogenic effects. Artificial Colors (e.g., Blue 1, Blue 2, Yellow 5, and Yellow 6) – Used in candies, beverages, and other processed foods. Banned or restricted in Norway, Finland, and Austria, among others, due to health concerns. Olestra (Olean) – A fat substitute used in some snack foods. Banned in Canada and the EU due to gastrointestinal side effects. Potassium Bromate – Used as a flour improver to strengthen dough. Banned in the EU, Canada, and China among others due to carcinogenic concerns. Arsenic – Found in some animal feeds, especially in poultry industry. Banned or restricted in the EU. GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms) – Specific GMO crops are banned or heavily regulated in many countries, including much of the EU, due to environmental and health concerns. Propylparaben – Used as a preservative in various food products. Banned or restricted in the EU for use in certain foods due to potential endocrine-disrupting effects. High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS) – While not banned in many countries, it’s subject to higher regulations and less commonly used in countries like the EU due to health concerns. Diacetyl – Used for butter flavoring in microwave popcorn and other foods. Restricted due to respiratory health concerns in occupational settings. Neonicotinoid Pesticides – While not a food additive, these pesticides used on crops are banned or restricted in the EU due to concerns about their impact on bee populations. Trans Fats (Partially Hydrogenated Oils) – Used in processed foods and baked goods. Severely restricted or banned in several countries due to heart disease risk. Aluminum-based Additives – Used in processed foods and as colorants. Restricted in some countries due to potential health risks. Theobromine – Used in some baked goods and to enhance flavor in chocolate products. Subject to regulation in some countries due to its effects similar to caffeine. Carrageenan – Used as a thickener and emulsifier in dairy and other products. Banned or restricted in infant formula in the EU due to digestive system concerns. Sodium Nitrite/Nitrate – Used for curing meats. While not banned, it is more heavily regulated in some countries due to potential cancer risks. Red Dye No. 40 (Allura Red AC) – A common food dye. Restricted in parts of the EU and associated with hyperactivity in children. Soylent – A meal replacement product. Banned in Canada for not meeting a meal replacement classification. Glyphosate-Based Herbicides – Widely used agricultural chemical. Banned or restricted in several countries due to potential carcinogenic and environmental effects. Meat from Cloned Animals – While not a substance, the sale of meat from cloned animals is allowed in the US but banned or restricted in the EU. Ethoxyquin – Used as a preservative in pet foods and some human foods like spices. Banned in the EU for certain uses due to potential health risks. Acrylamide – Not an additive, but a chemical that forms in some foods during high-temperature cooking. EU has stricter regulations to limit exposure. TBHQ (Tertiary Butylhydroquinone) – A preservative used in many processed foods. Limited use or restrictions in the EU due to potential health effects. Chlorpyrifos – A pesticide used on crops. Banned or restricted in the EU and other countries due to developmental risks. Dimethyl Dicarbonate (Velcorin) – Used in the beverage industry for microbial control. Restrictions vary due to toxicity concerns. Methyl Silicone – Used in non-food products but can migrate to food from treatments like antifoaming agents. Regulations vary. Phosphate Additives – Used in various processed foods. More heavily regulated in some countries due to health concerns related to heart disease. Quaternary Ammonium Compounds (Quats) – Used in food processing as antimicrobial agents. Restrictions vary due to potential health risks. Acesulfame Potassium – An artificial sweetener. While approved in the US, it faces more scrutiny and limitations in other countries due to safety concerns. Sucralose – Another artificial sweetener. Some countries recommend more moderate consumption due to potential health impacts. Titanium Dioxide – Used as a whitening agent in foods. Banned as a food additive in the EU due to concerns over nanoparticle effects on health. Here’s another list… Do you see Arsenic? That’s LITERAL rat poison, and it’s approved for use in our food here in the USA in certain quantities: Here’s what ChatGPT says about arsenic in our American food — my favorite part is how they work to “reduce” the amount of arsenic in baby food.  REDUCE?  How about eliminate and ban??? The FDA actively monitors and regulates the presence of arsenic in foods within the United States to ensure the safety of the food supply. Arsenic, a toxic element, can be present in food due to environmental contamination in soil, water, or air. The FDA’s efforts to manage arsenic levels include testing foods for total arsenic, distinguishing between organic (less harmful) and inorganic (more harmful) forms, and conducting risk assessments to understand the potential health risks associated with arsenic exposure from food. One significant focus has been on reducing arsenic exposure in foods commonly consumed by infants and young children, such as rice and rice products, because of their vulnerability to the harmful effects of these contaminants. The FDA’s actions include establishing “action levels” for inorganic arsenic in infant rice cereals and apple juice to minimize exposure. The action level for inorganic arsenic in infant rice cereal, for example, aims to protect the health of the most vulnerable populations, including babies, by setting a recommended maximum amount of inorganic arsenic allowed in these products. The FDA emphasizes the importance of a balanced diet to reduce the risks associated with arsenic and other contaminants, suggesting that diversifying foods can help limit exposure. Additionally, the FDA’s “Closer to Zero” plan outlines steps to reduce exposure to arsenic, lead, cadmium, and mercury in foods eaten by babies and young children to the lowest possible levels. Ok, now let’s take SPECIFIC foods and I think you’ll be blown away by this. Starting with good old Kraft Macaroni and Cheese. Look at what your kids eat in the USA vs what they give you in the UK: We all know Mac and Cheese isn’t the most healthy in the first place. But say you’re trying to eat better and you go for Oatmeal? Here’s what you get in the USA vs. the UK: Which one do you want to eat? Now let’s do McDonalds fries: And Mountain Dew (an old favorite of mine that I had to give up years ago): Check out this list of ingredients for Doritos: And Frosted Flakes: Tony the Tiger is all hopped up on CRAP here in the USA. It’s not grrrrrrreat…… Which I shamelessly stole from this moment on Norm Macdonald Live: Now back to the food…. Here’s even more (and then keep reading because I have a SOLUTION for you so you can start to take action today!): “Fake Food” EXPOSED: Watch For These Signs! I think this is going to open up a lot of eyes… Is your food FAKE? I think on some level we all know it is. We all know it’s full of chemicals and fillers and all sorts of other toxic things. We know that, but sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words…. ….and a video is worth a lot more. So I know you know it deep down already, and so do I, but I was STUNNED to see this video to see all the ways it is fake and toxic. It’s only 3 minutes long but it’s a huge eye opener. Take a look, from Rumble: Crazy, right? Speaking of fake food, let’s keep it going…. Have you heard of Bill Gates’ new company called “Apeel”? Bill Gates seems to think he IS God…and he won’t stop messing with our food supply. Here’s the latest…. It’s a company called “Apeel” and they place a “protective coating” over the outside of fruits. Gee, what could go wrong? Take a look: Beware – this is GM Gates ‘Apeel’ crap – DO NOT BUY! https://t.co/C6PphHTXcV — TheSmallestMinority (@G0dsW8r) April 12, 2023 Here’s what people are saying: If you see the Apeel logo on any fruit and veg do not buy it, this is a Bill Gates and WEF company, this chemical makes things last 3x longer and cannot be washed off, in US and Canada at the moment. pic.twitter.com/vvby1dZVxE — Ella Proud Refusenik (@EleftheriaElpis) April 12, 2023 @asda Asda is the first UK retailer to introduce Apeel’s plant-based protection to increase shelf life and help reduce food waste. Apeel was founded in 2012 after receiving a $100,000 grant from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.https://t.co/HzVEoWrM4S pic.twitter.com/iGirpJPkQ0 — Step #NoLockDowns (@beatthesystem1) April 12, 2023 Checking on Wikipedia, we confirm this IS INDEED a Bill Gates funded company: So basically, Bill Gates has decided he needs to put a “protective cover” over fruit. You know, the “peel” that God created is no longer good enough. Unreal the arrogance and evil of this man: According to Apeel, the Avocados will last twice as long! Just spray this stuff on your food, no problemo: Here’s what they say from their website: From Eater.com: Throwing out spoiled avocados may be a thing of the past, thanks to a California-based startup that counts Bill Gates among its backers. Apeel Sciences says it’s devised a way to keep avocados at peak ripeness for twice as long, Bloomberg reports, which could drastically cut back on food waste at grocery stores (and at the homes of avocado toast-loving millennials). Apeel uses recycled plant material to make a powder, which is then mixed with water and used to wash the avocados, resulting in a kind of “second skin” being applied to the fruit. According to the company, “Apeel keeps moisture inside produce and oxygen out, which dramatically slows the rate that produce spoils.” Apeel says its product is odorless, colorless, and tasteless, and has been tested on more than two dozen different types of fruits and vegetables, though for now it’s focusing on the pricey and popular avocado. The company is currently testing its product on avocados in a partnership with produce supplier Del Rey Avocados; they will be available in more than 100 Midwestern grocery stores, including 30 Costco locations. While avocados that stay ripe for longer would seemingly be welcome just about everywhere, it makes particular sense for them to be sold at Costco, the bulk retailer where avocados are sold in multi-count bags rather than individually. Speaking of Bill Gates, if making the fruit toxic isn’t enough, he’s also trying to put the mRNA vaxx in Cattle! Hello mRNA steaks! Would you like your steak well done? Medium? Medium rare? No matter what you choose it’s about to also come with a side of the mRNA poison vaxx! How wonderful! **BUT KEEP READING, I HAVE THE SOLUTION DOWN BELOW** Look, I don’t know about you but I don’t want mRNA in my meat. I want to eat big, beautiful Black Angus RED MEAT the way God made it! The very fact they’re trying to poison the meat tells you all you need to know. Meat must be very good for you. Especially meat without antibiotics, without growth hormones, without chemicals….and definitely without mRNA! But thanks to “Kill Gates” and his friends like Klaus (Anal) Schwab, that kind of unadulterated meat is becoming harder and harder to find. Why do the big companies pump the cattle full of all this crap? In Bill Gates’ case, I think he truly believes in a depopulation agenda. For all the rest? It’s business, baby!  Big business!  Toxic Big Business! These big companies raise the cattle in stalls with no space in between them. The result? One cow gets sick, they all get sick! So to keep the operation going, they are constantly pumped full of hormones and antibiotics….and then guess what goes into your body when you eat them? Guess what goes into your kids bodies? Ever wonder why kids are starting puberty at younger and younger ages? Couldn’t be related to them eating meat pumped full of cow steroids, could it? But enough about the problem…. I NEVER leave you with just the problem. You better know I’ve got the solution! I’d like to introduce you to Black Angus beef, pasture raised on hundreds of thousands of acres. Free roaming with plenty of open air between all the cattle. Grass fed. No hormones and no antibiotics.  Never! Oh, and it’s CHEAPER than Omaha Steaks! BOOM, who loves ya baby! The only “catch”? It’s Invite only. Good thing you know someone that has the invites….(me!). If you’d like to find out more and get a FREE personal invite, just go here and tell them Noah sent you:  https://SwitchWithNoah.com More info on the beef here: U.S. Ranchers Banding Together To Save Our Food Supply! $300 Million Raised! It's the real deal, and because they don't raise the Black Angus like the big companies do, they may have the SHUT OFF invites if they grow too fast. So if you want in, let me know soon. It's all part of something bigger I've just started working on. Let me fill you in... When I started this website back in 2015 I started it because I was on a mission... I wanted to get the truth out to as many people as possible. The truth that wasn't being covered anywhere else. I started with literally 0. Zero experience... Zero money... Zero backers... Zero readers... Zero of any of you! Along the way, we've built a massive community of people who love America and want to see our country become great again. We now average between 4 and 6 million readers EACH MONTH! And we're growing again, pretty quickly. More importantly, the MISSION is growing! But we've also faced major opposition. Oh it hasn't been easy by any stretch of the imagination. We were DELETED from Facebook after having 1.5 million people Follow and Love our Page! Just poof....one day, gone! We've been censored on almost every platform out there, emails sent to Junk or just "disappeared" despite people signing up over and over. Speaking of email, we've had two email companies ban us because they went Far-Left. So it hasn't always been easy... But we're on a MISSION and mission always wins out in the end. And today I want to tell you about an expansion of that mission. From Day 1, our mission has been about getting the truth out to as many people as we possibly can. But after being deleted, banned and censored by almost everyone out there, I realized pretty quick that we need a Parallel Economy! We need to stop sending our dollars to the corporations that hate us and want to see us gone! Remember the Georgia Guidestones? They literally told us they wanted to reduce us from 8 billion people on the Earth down to only 500 million. No big deal, right? Just an elimination of 94% of all people living right now. And yet we continue to shop at their big stores and send them our money, because until now we've had little choice. Well, today that changes. And today my mission EXPANDS... And I'm SO excited! Allow me to introduce you to the solution. It's time to "Make The Switch" and change where you send your dollars each month. What if I told you instead of sending your money to Jeff Bezos and Costco and Walmart, you could shop at the LAST pro-America, freedom-loving, American designer, manufacturer and shipper of all the stuff you buy each month! Oh, and what if I told you the products are BETTER and often CHEAPER? Yes, for real. And what if I told you this is the best kept secret you've never heard of before, but that this company has been doing this for the last 37 years? And their founder was once placed on Barack Hussein Obama's list of the Top 10 most "Dangerous Conservatives" in America? (a list I one day hope to make myself!) All of that is real and I'm so excited to tell you about it and I hope you'll join the MISSION with me. Here's a quick summary of this company that I'm so excited to now be partnered up with on this mission: Sound good to anyone else? Me too! The reason you've never heard of them is because it's Invite Only. I can get you in, but you can't just go sign up. They only want people on the same mission to join and they're happy to say "no" to the Far-Left Libs! They've been doing it for 37 years and it's been working great. Oh, and did I mention the products are non-toxic and don't have all the chemicals and crap like Red Dye 40 that all the Big Corporations put in their products to weaken you? To wear you down? To make you -- and your family -- sick? Because then when you get sick you'll buy their drugs! Sorry folks, I don't play that game and neither does my family. We're talking the LAST all natural, grass fed, no hormone, massive beef cattle ranch in the United States.... Sound good? We're talking Fluoride Free Toothpaste, chemical free cleaners, Deet-free mosquito repellant! What novel concepts, right? Stop sending you money to these 11 corporations that do NOT have your best interest at heart: It's an ILLUSION of choice. There's only one pro-American, American made and manufactured, chemical free, toxin free, hormone free, company left....and I'm teaming up with them to FIGHT BACK! Who's with me? Watch this: As I said, it's Invite Only and the invite is completely free! In fact, I've assembled a team of patriots who will personally get you invited and signed up....if you want in. It's called "Patriot Switch" and I think the name says it all. Folks, we don't have many strongholds left. This is one. And I'm all in. If you'd like to find out more and get a FREE personal invite, just go here: https://SwitchWithNoah.com Tell them Noah sent you and I promise you will get a personal call, text or email. Don't freak out when you do. And make sure you tell them you are interested in the Black Angus beef! I know I tend to get concerned when I get messages from numbers I don't recognize, but if you request a Free Invite (Link here: https://SwitchWithNoah.com) you WILL have someone from my Inner Circle reach out to you....so be ready! These are awesome people and I think you'll love getting a chance to talk with them. And they'll help get you all set up. Who's with me? - Noah p.s. Since everyone gets personal attention, we will take these in the order in which they come in.  So if you are excited, ask for your invite now or you might be far down on the list.  I have a great team, but they can only do so much and they'll work on a first-come, first-served basis. Request a free Invite here:  https://SwitchWithNoah.com