The Supreme Court has allowed the Trump administration to revoke temporary protected status for 500,000 illegal aliens living in the U.S.   In a 7-2 ruling on Friday, the justices lifted a lower court’s order that barred the Trump administration from deporting illegal aliens from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela who entered the U.S. under the Biden administration parole program.   The court’s decision comes in response to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s efforts to end the Biden-era parole policy that allowed migrants from the four countries to fly directly into the U.S. and be transported into the interior of the county.   On his first day back in office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order directing DHS to “terminate all categorical parole programs,” including the “processes for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans, and Venezuelans.”   In March, the Department of Homeland Security issued a notice announcing the official termination of the program, effective on April 24, but a federal judge blocked DHS from revoking legal status for the illegal aliens in the U.S. under the parole program.  The Trump administration’s action was challenged in a federal court in Massachusetts, which stayed DHS’ action. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 1st Circuit upheld the federal court’s decision. The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court to undo the lower court’s stay.  The Supreme Court’s order allows the Trump administration to move forward with plans to terminate the legal status of Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela migrants while an appeal is pending before the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals.  Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Sonia Sotomayor issued a dissenting opinion from the order granting the Trump administration its request for a stay.   “The Court has plainly botched this assessment today,” Jackson wrote in her dissent. “It requires next to nothing from the Government with respect to irreparable harm. And it undervalues the devastating consequences of allowing the Government to precipitously upend the lives and livelihoods of nearly half a million noncitizens while their legal claims are pending.” The Supreme Court’s ruling Friday comes just two weeks after the justices issued an order allowing the Trump administration to proceed with plans to strip temporary protected status from thousands of illegal aliens from Venezuela living in the U.S.   This article was updated after publication with additional information. The post SCOTUS Allows Trump Administration to Revoke Legal Status for 500K Illegal Aliens appeared first on The Daily Signal.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. T-Mobile is facing renewed backlash over its T-Life app, this time for quietly introducing a screen recording feature that is automatically activated on some devices. The tool, labeled “Screen recording tool,” has been discovered by users in the app’s settings, prompting immediate concerns about transparency and user consent. Described as a means of gathering behavioral data to help enhance the app’s functionality, the tool is being deployed without upfront notification in many cases. Though T-Mobile insists it does not collect personal data and only monitors activity within the app itself, the feature’s default-on status has unsettled many customers. The company told CNET, “This tool records activities within the app only and does not see or access any personal information,” and noted that users can deactivate it under the Preferences section. While this type of telemetry is not uncommon in the tech world, the method of deployment here has caught attention. Unlike the app’s pre-existing Screen Share function, which allows support reps to view a user’s screen during troubleshooting, but only with explicit approval, this newly introduced screen recorder operates passively in the background. Those using newer devices, including iPhones, have reported spotting the toggle under T-Life’s settings. When opened, the setting reveals a message: “We use a tool to record how customers use the app to analyze and improve your experience. Only T-Mobile will review and analyze your info.” The wording clearly distances the feature from the more familiar customer support tool, yet fails to explain why consent isn’t requested beforehand. Reports from tech publications such as Droidlife have shown that this change hasn’t gone unnoticed, especially among users who discovered the feature had been turned on without their knowledge. As awareness spreads, the rollout has ignited questions about how much control customers really have over what’s being recorded. For those looking to disable the feature, the path isn’t overly complicated. Open the T-Life app, tap on “Manage,” then the settings gear, and navigate to “Preferences.” If the new feature is present, you’ll find a toggle that can be switched from magenta (active) to gray (inactive), along with the explanatory message. The rollout appears to be gradual, and it’s unclear whether the update is limited to specific models or regions. Still, the underlying concern is a familiar one: even if the intent is diagnostic or performance-related, implementing such tools without prior opt-in continues to erode trust. T-Mobile has framed the update as a way to “quickly troubleshoot reported or detected issues,” but the lack of a transparent opt-in mechanism calls into question how seriously user autonomy is being taken. Rather than allowing individuals to knowingly consent before any screen activity is recorded, the company has once again leaned on passive data collection under the banner of user experience. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post T-Mobile Faces Backlash for Auto-Enabled Screen Recording in T-Life App Without User Consent appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

Crypto-Nite: Creepy Kidnapping Case That Won't Quit

Tapper's Ratings Hurt By His Book? Seems So...

The story demonstrates how quickly ideas can spread through a community and manifest in weird ways.

Recent discussions surrounding unidentified aerial phenomena (UAP) are prompting a re-evaluation of long-held assumptions about our place in the cosmos and the nature of reality itself. A notable perspective emerging from these conversations, specifically from David Grusch, suggests that the observable UAP subject might be intrinsically linked to phenomena historically interpreted through theological or spiritual frameworks. Grusch has asserted that certain narratives within religious texts, traditionally considered fables or allegories, may in fact describe actual events. He recently stated, “Unfortunately you’re bursting maybe a world view or a bubble for some people, but it actually ultimately might enforce people’s belief systems, because… stories in the religious texts weren’t fable, allegory or whatever. They happened! And I’m not saying all of them did, but there might be evidence if we were openly and honestly studying the subject in more detail.” The extensive classification of information related to UAP is another significant point of contention raised by Grusch. While national security is often cited as the primary reason for secrecy, Grusch believes the level of classification goes beyond what is strictly necessary. He commented, “I think is an abuse you know so executive order 13526. It delineates the eight reasons you classify information, and the only thing that this falls under is: scientific and technical information that has National Security implications. Its boilerplate. And it’s really just an abuse at this point in over classifying things, out of fear of the socio-economic, theological and counter intelligence implications.” This suggests that the true motives behind this overclassification stem from fears surrounding potential broader societal impacts, with Grusch stating, “Its overclassified out of fear of [among other things] theological implications,” and hinting at “probably something darker and more disturbing going on.” Furthermore, Grusch has directly connected the UAP phenomenon to historical spiritual interpretations. When asked about a spiritual connection, he responded, “I think if you were to back out to the 100,000 foot level, there certainly is a phenomenon. And how do we quantify that? Well theologically we can quantify that as angels, demons that kind of thing. Many people with religious belief systems espouse faith in that regard, and they believe that a phenomenon exists. And really what we’re seeing here with the UFO UAP subject is probably just another facet of that same phenomenon.” This perspective posits that UAP are not entirely new or isolated occurrences, but rather a contemporary facet of this enduring, multifaceted phenomenon. Interestingly, Grusch also noted, “I mean even the Vatican Chief astronomer in 2009 or 2010 said the vatican’s okay with non-human intelligence. It doesn’t hurt Catholic theology,” suggesting that such disclosures may not inherently conflict with established theological doctrines. Beyond theoretical implications, Grusch has made concrete claims of recovered materials and “occupants” associated with UAP incidents. He stated, “We’ve recovered the occupants. The president can decide what should be disclosed.” Elaborating further, he emphasized, “I’m here, you know it’s time to reconcile this… we need to heal from this. We need to disclose the basics: the fact that we’re not alone. We’ve recovered material. And we’ve recovered the occupants. And beyond that, the president can decide what should be disclosed. That’s above my pay grade.” When asked if the 1933 Magenta craft was the first he knew of, Grusch replied, “no but that was one of the ones I ran through DOD security.” While he refrained from commenting on specific earlier incidents for security reasons, he did confirm, “yeah there’s, I know about many other events but however those… that’s the only one that I’ve cleared through security.” This suggests a longer, more intricate history of interaction with, or observation of, these phenomena than generally acknowledged. When discussing the potential for unlocking new levels of energy or propulsion, Grusch was asked if military aircraft hadn’t progressed to some “crazy level.” His response, “Obviously. At least.. uh… based on what the public knows.” This implies that insights gained from UAP research, if openly studied, could potentially unlock groundbreaking advancements in fields like energy and propulsion, offering solutions to global challenges, such as climate change. David Grusch is a former United States Air Force (USAF) officer and intelligence official who has claimed that the U.S. federal government, in collaboration with private aerospace companies, has highly secretive special access programs involved in the recovery and reverse engineering of “non-human” spacecraft and their dead pilots, and that people have been threatened and killed in order to conceal these programs. The post David Grusch’s Unifying Theory: Why the Truth About the UAP is Suppressed appeared first on Anomalien.com.

The Friday editions of ABC’s Good Morning America and NBC’s Today both employed Harvard Professor and former U.S. Ambassador to China Nicholas Burns to attack the Trump administration’s move to “aggressively” curtail student visas to Chinese nationals. As Burns was both networks’ sole expert, much critical information about the administration's concerns was noticably missing. On GMA, Selina Wang reported on “a dramatic new escalation that could impact universities across the country. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announcing the U.S. will work to aggressively revoke visas of Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields.” She then introduced Burns, “The Trump Administration has already accused Harvard of failing to confront anti-Semitic harassment and claims the school has coordinated with the Chinese Communist Party, allegations Harvard denies. Former ambassador to China, Nicholas Burns, now a Harvard professor, telling us there's already a rigorous vetting process.”     The idea that Harvard has coordinated with the CCP is a proven fact. Reuters, not exactly a right-wing MAGA outlet, reported on May 24, “Harvard’s links to China, which include research partnerships and China-focused academic centers, are longstanding. The ties have yielded major financial gifts, influence in international affairs and global prestige for the school.” Reuters also highlighted how, “Harvard provided public health-related training to Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC) officials after 2020. That year the U.S. imposed sanctions on the Chinese paramilitary organization for its role in alleged human rights abuses against Uyghurs and other Muslim ethnic groups in Xinjiang.” There was also the case of “Former Harvard Professor Charles Lieber” who “ was scrutinized by a Trump program started in 2018 called the China Initiative, which was focused on fighting Chinese espionage and intellectual property theft and investigated researchers and universities over whether they disclosed financial ties to Beijing. He was convicted in 2021 of lying about his ties to China in connection with federally funded research. In April, he became a full-time professor at a Chinese university.” As for Burns, he stated that, “Those who are a security risk should not have a visa, but that probably excludes the vast majority of the applicants and the vast majority of the 277,000 Chinese students in the United States.” There have also been several incidents of Chinese students getting arrested for military espionage, so the “rigorous” system is clearly not rigorous enough. However, on Today, Stephanie Gosk also teed up Burns, “Burns also served as ambassador to China, which the State Department is now targeting, saying it will ‘aggressively” revoke visas for Chinese students studying critical fields or with connections to the Chinese Communist Party. A move that extends far beyond Harvard, targeting more than a quarter million students currently attending school in the U.S.” Burns again lamented the decision, “Our beef is not with the 1.4 billion Chinese citizens. They're not the problem. We should want them to be able to visit our country as tourists or stay as students. If they're law-abiding and we shouldn’t close the door to that kind of opportunity.” The problem is that in a communist party dictatorship, the question of whether someone here on a student visa is a private citizen gets much murkier. Besides, just about everybody in Washington says the CCP is this country’s greatest national security threat, but talking about something is quite different than doing something about it. If China is the threat we say it is, then why would it make sense to assist it in its quest to surpass us in every field? Here are transcripts for the May 30 shows: ABC Good Morning America 5/30/2025 7:11 AM ET SELINA WANG: And now a dramatic new escalation that could impact universities across the country. Secretary of State Marco Rubio announcing the U.S. will work to aggressively revoke visas of Chinese students, including those with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or studying in critical fields. The Trump Administration has already accused Harvard of failing to confront anti-Semitic harassment and claims the school has coordinated with the Chinese Communist Party, allegations Harvard denies. Former ambassador to China, Nicholas Burns, now a Harvard professor, telling us there's already a rigorous vetting process. NICHOLAS BURNS: Those who are a security risk should not have a visa, but that probably excludes the vast majority of the applicants and the vast majority of the 277,000 Chinese students in the United States. WANG: But it's unclear how many Chinese students could be impacted by that State Department announcement and as for Harvard, this legal battle continues with dollars in federal funds frozen. A hearing for that is scheduled for July. George? *** NBC Today 5/30/2025 STEPHANIE GOSK: Burns also served as ambassador to China, which the State Department is now targeting, saying it will “aggressively” revoke visas for Chinese students studying critical fields or with connections to the Chinese Communist Party. A move that extends far beyond Harvard, targeting more than a quarter million students currently attending school in the U.S. NICHOLAS BURNS: Our beef is not with the 1.4 billion Chinese citizens. They're not the problem. We should want them to be able to visit our country as tourists or stay as students. If they're law-abiding and we shouldn’t close the door to that kind of opportunity.

Filmmaker and mother Jessica Solce was frustrated by the difficulty of finding healthy, all-natural products for herself and her family. To make it easier, she created the Solarium, which curates trusted, third-party-tested foods, clothing, beauty products, and more — all free of seed oils, endocrine disruptors, carcinogens, and other harmful additives. In this occasional column she shares recommendations and research she's picked up during her ongoing education in health and wellness. “Changes in gray and white matter in brains of women taking [oral contraceptives] suggest that OCs have an effect on brain architecture.” —Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology, volume 67, October 2022. I tried birth control in college. It lasted less than three months, and then I ran for the hills. Birth control distorts sexual attraction. Women are literally put off the scent of the hunt for the right partner. I hated how my body was feeling. It was swelling, and my mind was unsettled and lethargic. Luckily I had an old-world mother who always warned me never to take birth control, so I tiptoed into my college experiment with awareness and wariness, hypervigilant for any side effects. Before we get into exactly why hormonal birth control is systemically wrecking your body and mind — both on a micro (you) and a macro (societal, generational) level — I'm going to skip ahead to the takeaway. This is easily one of the most important things you'll read all week, and I can't risk you clicking off before you finish reading. Here it is: Ladies, don't use the pill, the patch, or the ring. Or any method of contraception interfering with your body's delicate balance of hormones. It doesn’t matter if it has some “positive” side effects. Any pharmaceutical intervention will upend your body's natural balance, and whatever the “positive” side effects, they are absolutely overshadowed by the multitude of negative side effects: migraines, anxiety attacks, loss of libido, brain alterations, thrombosis, personality disorders, depression, and cancer. Your best option, to quote Nancy Reagan, is to just say no. Of course, the former first lady was talking about illegal drugs. But if we've learned anything in the past couple of decades, it's that the stuff the pharmaceutical companies peddle can be just as bad. Maybe you've heard this kind of talk linked to the slogan Make America Healthy Again. Even if MAHA is a little too similar to MAGA for your taste, don't buy into the propaganda that ditching birth control is somehow a partisan issue. In a recent interview with Rolling Stone, 29-year-old pop singer Lorde spoke positively about her decision to stop using birth control for the first time since she was fifteen. Still, she felt the need to issue a disclaimer: “I’ve now come to see my decision was maybe some quasi right-wing programming." RELATED: Lorde and 5 other celebs who broke up with birth control alex_skp/James Devaney/Joel Nito/Getty Images Well, if a woman living in tune with her body and not dependent on Big Pharma is right-wing, welcome to the right wing, Lorde. Welcome, all. Here's what hormonal birth control does in addition to preventing pregnancy.It changes who you're attracted to In 2008, 100 women were asked to sniff the shirts of men and rate them by odor, most to least attractive. The results suggested that women on the pill preferred the scent of men with similar MHC genes. MHC genes are crucial to the development of the immune system; offspring of parents with a well-balanced diversity of these genes tend to be more resistant to disease. By contrast, women not on birth control were drawn to men with dissimilar MHC genes — selecting for offspring with strong immune systems. You're instinctively drawn to a man whose genes fill in what you’re missing — a match that benefits your future children. Incredible, really. Birth control distorts sexual attraction. Women are literally put off the scent of the hunt for the right partner. Also, when a woman goes off birth control, she can find herself no longer attracted to her partner’s pheromones. It messes with our water supply We in the West love to point out the detrimental environmental effects of automobiles while ignoring the toxic emissions from our own bodies. All of the drugs we consume end up passing through us and right back into the water system. This pollutes our drinking water as well as the habitats of aquatic animals. Like the herbicide atrazine, estrogen from birth control can wreak havoc on mating cycles, causing intersex conditions, low sperm count, and population collapse. It increases the risk of cancer Users of hormonal contraceptives face a 20% to 30% higher risk of breast cancer. And yet most reports tend to dismiss any alarm this figure might raise. This reassuring passage is typical: "Experts say the increased risk is small and the benefits of hormonal contraceptives still outweigh the risks for many people." Contrast that with the general attitude toward another known cancer risk: smoking cigarettes. Even just five cigarettes a day increases your risk of lung cancer by almost 8%. Once you get up to pack or two a day, that risk rises to something like 25%. In other words, about the same increased risk as birth control. When it comes to cigarettes, however, the "experts" sing a different tune: "There’s no 'safe' number of cigarettes you can smoke per day. Any number of cigarettes can increase your risk of developing cancer." It messes with your brain A 2019 study found that women who take oral contraception had a significantly smaller hypothalamus than those who don't. The hypothalamus is the region of the brain regulating any number of bodily functions, from sex drive and sleep cycles to appetite and heart rate. A smaller hypothalamus correlates with depression and decreased emotional regulation. Vice soon responded with an article "debunking" the study: Yes, birth control alters the structure of the brain, but who's to say that's a bad thing? Yeah, no thanks. A 2023 study revealed that women on oral contraceptives did not experience the typical reduction in the stress hormone ACTH after social activities. This suggests that hormonal contraceptives may alter how the body regulates stress and directly causes elevated cortisol levels. It makes being a teenager exponentially worse A 2016 Danish study found that females 15 to 19 using oral contraception were likely to be diagnosed with depression at a 70% higher rate than non-users. The patch and vaginal rings had even higher correlation with depression. Many of those diagnosed go on to take antidepressants, another lifetime prescription keeping them dependent on the pharmaceutical companies. Still, birth control defenders say there's nothing to see here. In the words of Dr. Cora Breuner, a Seattle pediatrician who chairs the committee on adolescents for the American Academy of Pediatrics, “An unintended and unwanted pregnancy far outweighs all the other side effects that could occur from a contraceptive." Oh, and taking birth control during adolescence can also disrupt brain development, especially processes related to the fear response. Could rampant birth control use have anything to do with women's higher rates of anxiety disorders? Seems like a question worth asking. It gets into breast milk What we eat goes directly into our breast milk and into our babies. Do we really need a science experiment for this logic? We're advised not to eat too much broccoli because it may give our babies uncomfortable gas. RELATED: MAHA study unveiled: The truth behind autism Tasos Katopodis/Getty Images But don’t worry about those drugs you're taking, and have you considered updating your vaccines? Do you want to fill your babies' bodies with synthetic estrogen or progestin? Logically these synthetic hormones go downstream and directly into our breast milk. If there is a negative risk to my infant’s growth, that is enough warning for me. We are already aware that oral contraceptives increase chances of cancer and may cause behavioral and personality disorders. So why is cancer increasing so drastically in children? We actually know. Leukemia is the most common type of cancer in children, and a Scandinavian study found a direct link to birth control. It messes with your metabolism Some birth control pills, especially those with certain hormones like androgenic progestins, can negatively affect glucose metabolism, i.e., make it harder for the body to handle sugar. This means blood sugar and insulin levels may spike after eating, which can lead to problems like insulin resistance, a higher chance of developing type 2 diabetes, and heart disease. It can cause other life-altering side effects “I would get these migraines that would shock my body into so much pain that I would then have seizures,” said one woman in a 2018 BBC documentary. Also on the menu are anxiety attacks, weight gain, pulmonary embolisms, and blood clots. Good luck addressing any of these problems. Most doctors aren't trained to recognize birth control side effects, often leading women to seek additional pharmaceutical solutions. It's coming for men, too That's right, guys. Thank to the wonders of science, soon all of this can be yours too. Who knows what interesting new effects we'll see when we start tampering with male hormones? Health begins with the awareness that our bodies are incredibly complex, elegantly constructed systems. My mission with the Solarium is to help us be better stewards of this natural gift.

A Maryland police chief decried what he called a "broken system" after a 16-year-old male arrested in connection with 121 car break-ins in one night earlier this month was released after just five hours in custody.Police in Laurel said the male and two other teens smashed car windows and stole items from 54 cars in Laurel and 67 more in Prince George's, Anne Arundel, and Howard Counties on the night of May 4, WRC-TV reported.'I had one woman stop me and mention to me that this is the third time this has happened to her car. And because the deductible was so high, she had to make adjustments in her home, including the purchase of food.'Police arrested the 16-year-old on Wednesday morning, the station said, but just five hours later, police were forced to release him."He was released back into the community, back into the environment that allowed him to be out roaming the streets in all of these counties late at night and in the early morning," Laurel Police Chief Russ Hamill told WRC.The State's Attorney's Office supported detectives' intention to hold the teen, but the Department of Juvenile Services shot that down, saying the young suspect didn't have a prior record, and the crimes weren't violent, Hamill added to the station.RELATED: Video: Entitled female hits cop with car, drives down closed street because she has to 'go to work.' Bad idea. "We don't do this lightly. We don't ask for young people to be held on a whim. We do so to help protect the community and them," the chief also told WRC. "I have little hope there will be further accountability for him due to this broken system."Blaze News on Friday morning asked a Department of Juvenile Services spokesperson if the agency had any comment on Hamill's "broken system" declaration, but the spokesperson told Blaze News that "laws in place preclude our ability to talk about individual cases at all."Hamill told WRC that video from May 4 shows two suspects walk from car to car in a parking lot and use flashlights to search inside and that a third suspect is seen nearby driving a stolen car in case they need to make a getaway."They were just simply going through neighborhoods and targets of opportunity, breaking into cars," Hamill added to the station. "If there was something in there, they'd steal. If there was nothing in there, they'd move to another car."More from WRC:Investigators found the keys to the stolen car and keys to 25 other cars during a search warrant at the 16-year-old suspect's home in Beltsville, police said. They also found several stolen items, police said.Hamill said although some might consider car break-ins a lower-level crime, they greatly affect the victims, who often have to pay hundreds of dollars on their insurance deductibles and miss work because they don't have a useable car.RELATED: Illegal immigrant arrested in connection with stabbing released from custody after paperwork went unfiled — then he allegedly committed a murder "I had one woman stop me and mention to me that this is the third time this has happened to her car," Hamill told the station. "And because the deductible was so high, she had to make adjustments in her home, including the purchase of food."Laurel police on Friday morning told Blaze News that the two other juvenile suspects wanted in connection with the car break-ins were arrested for unrelated crimes in other jurisdictions.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The White House moved to correct errors in the highly anticipated MAHA report Thursday after inconsistencies and inaccuracies were found in the citations. The errors in the MAHA report were first reported by NOTUS on Thursday. They included broken links and studies that apparently did not exist. The White House later uploaded the corrected version of the report, and the administration maintained that the errors do not refute the substance of the report. "I understand there were some formatting issues with the MAHA report that are being addressed, and the report will be updated," press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday. "But it does not negate the substance of the report, which, as you know, is one of the most transformative health reports that has ever been released by the federal government."'It’s time for the media to also focus on what matters.'RELATED: Who is bankrolling the anti-MAHA movement? Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty ImagesThe Department of Health and Human Services similarly stated that they were simply formatting errors and that they don't change the historic findings in the report. "Minor citation and formatting errors have been corrected, but the substance of the MAHA report remains the same — a historic and transformative assessment by the federal government to understand the chronic disease epidemic afflicting our nation’s children," an HHS spokesperson said. "Under President Trump and Secretary Kennedy, our federal government is no longer ignoring this crisis, and it’s time for the media to also focus on what matters."However, these errors seem to go beyond formatting as the administration is suggesting. The citations included broken links and even pointed to numerous studies that reportedly do not appear in the issues of the journals cited and may not even exist at all."The paper cited is not a real paper that I or my colleagues were involved with," Katherine Keyes, an epidemiologist listed as an author, told NOTUS. "We’ve certainly done research on this topic, but did not publish a paper in JAMA Pediatrics on this topic with that co-author group, or with that title."RELATED: Elon Musk formally departs from DOGE following a tumultuous tenure Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty ImagesThe report itself, which was spearheaded by HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., focused on identifying root causes for various health epidemics affecting American children, including chronic diseases, obesity, autoimmune conditions, and behavioral disorders. Some of these root causes include ultra-processed foods, pesticides, and exposure to chemicals, as well as "overmedicalization." Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!