WTF: Parent In Easter Bunny Costume Hands Out Condom-Filled Eggs To Children in Texas https://www.infowars.com/posts..../wtf-parent-in-easte
WTF: Parent In Easter Bunny Costume Hands Out Condom-Filled Eggs To Children in Texas https://www.infowars.com/posts..../wtf-parent-in-easte
He has Risen and here is something to chew on
He is Risen Mohamed is still dead
https://www.shareapuzzle.com/p....lay/18358/Crossword-
Islam is just pure evil
The riots of the Easter weekend confirm that Islam does not belong in Sweden
April 17, 2022
at 18.00
0
LEADERS During the Easter weekend, we have received new acknowledgments that the totalitarian religious ideology of Islam is not compatible with Western democratic society and, as part of this, the dividing line between VI who fights with the pen and DOM who seizes the sword.
Unfortunately, we have also witnessed new examples of how democracy in conflict with Islam retreats and how heavy domestic actors in politics and the media, for whom the stance for democracy against Islam should be obvious, instead do something in common with the Muslim perpetrators in their demands to abolish constitutional freedoms and rights that have hitherto been cornerstones of a democratic society.
The Christian Passover, which is to be a time of peace and contemplation of what we can learn from Jesus' suffering and death and, for more secular Swedes, a wonderful long weekend for fellowship with family and friends, has instead been torn apart by Islamic extremist riots and riots. Police officers who tried (and in some cases did not try) to maintain order have been stoned and beaten and their vehicles have been stolen and set on fire. All to the accompaniment of the "Allahu akbar" battle cries that are the constant verbal companions of Muslim violence.
Muslim violence is allowed to prevail over democracy
The urgent reason for the country's immigrant violent Muslims to take to the streets and (so far) turn parts of Linköping, Norrköping, Stockholm, Örebro and Landskrona into what police on the spot described as a war zone is that the Danish-Swedish politician Rasmus Paludan is conducting a square tour in Sweden. At these meetings, he talks about the societal problems that followed in the footsteps of the Muslim mass immigration and the left-liberal policies that made it possible. At the same time, he burns a copy of the Qur'an with him on each occasion.
Or at least that has been the idea. In reality, Paludan's licensed square meetings with support from the Swedish constitution have in most cases not been possible. Instead, Muslim violence has been allowed to prevail when the police have shown an inability and the authority's management also a direct unwillingness to defend law and order and Swedish democracy.
Escalation argument for retreating wrong thinking
It is bad that the Police Authority is not able to fulfill its mission. That it deliberately evades it is worse. But the worst is how the supposedly good and democratic forces in Sweden meet where they should be uncompromising.
When the police fail to keep Muslim violence in check and preserve a constitutional right, it signals physical weakness. When the police management actively makes a decision not to even try to fulfill its mission, it also signals mental weakness.
It is fatal when dealing with primitive forces that only understand the language of power. The reasoning about retiring because you do not want the violence to escalate is reversed. Every time the police back down, they tell the perpetrators that their violence pays off and extrapolate that an escalated violence will pay off even more.
Part2
The police authority allowed itself to be humiliated
During the Muslim weekend riots, the police have not only failed in general or retreated in an orderly manner. The religious-political extremists have been allowed to humiliate the Police Authority and indirectly Swedish democracy and the Swedish people.
In no other way can it be described when the police hand over their radio cars and picket buses to the perpetrators who then have to parade undisturbed around in them, wearing uniforms with police emblems that they found in the vehicles and then finish by setting the cars on fire.
Reverse use of the epithet "extremist"
In the media coverage of the Muslim riots, Paludan has been called a "right-wing extremist" because he burns Korans and his political motives have been highlighted and questioned. The Muslim rioters who burn police cars, on the other hand, have escaped such an epithet and also all the critical examination of their religious-political motives and how to legitimize their use of force.
This despite the fact that it is fully permitted right up to the constitution to burn a book (provided it is one's own) but a serious crime to burn a police vehicle. Since the motive for the car burning is religiously political, one can ask which opinions are most extreme and take on the most extreme expressions - those of the Paludans or the pro-violence Muslims.
However, this question is not asked in the newsrooms when reporting on the events of the Easter weekend. Even SVT and SR, which have a requirement to be objective and impartial and in addition a special democracy clause to follow, turn the reality upside down with the narrative that it is actually fundamentalist Islam that is normal and Swedish constitution and democracy that is extreme. In an article , state television describes it as "controversial" to stand up for Swedish democracy and freedom against Muslim dictatorship and theocracy
Civil liberties and rights as showbread
The attitude that freedom of speech, opinion and assembly is fine to have on paper but should not be used in reality if it irritates Muslims is not only with the journalist corps but also with many politicians. Even if they do not sanction the acts of violence per se, they see as a solution to how to deal with the violence to meet the pro-violence Muslims in their demands that promote democracy.
An example is the Social Democratic Member of Parliament Ola Möller. In a post on Facebook , due to the events of the Easter weekend, he demands changes in the law and expanded interpretations of the law that make it a crime to burn Korans or otherwise irritate Muslims. " That a Danish right-wing extremist is allowed to cause problems and bastards in Sweden is hell ," he writes.
SVT Nyheter wears in the same narrative when they highlight the Arab immigrant Ali Hussein, living in Örebro, saying " He who came from Denmark should not cause chaos in Sweden, it is wrong ". Of course, neither the Social Democrats nor state television dare to suggest that it is wrong to come to Sweden as an asylum immigrant and "cause chaos", despite the fact that in this context it is the more relevant reaction.
Scary democracy of the governing party
Among Möller's proposals is a further extension of the law on incitement against ethnic groups, which has already been criticized for slippage. According to the Social Democrat member of parliament, it should also be possible to restrict civil liberties and rights with a freer interpretation of legal space such as incitement and attempts at various types of crime, annoying behavior and more.
That Paludan is forced to wear a helmet and safety vest at his demonstrations in order to protect himself against Muslim violence, Möller sees as proof that what Paludan is doing should be impermissible. It is frightening to realize that a person who reasons so backwards and has such an inverted view of who is the perpetrator and victim of crime is actually sitting in the Swedish Parliament as a representative of the country's largest and ruling party.
Even more frightening is the realization that he is not something unique. Even Minister of Justice Morgan Johansson (S) says in an interview with TV4 that Paludan is the one who is a "thug" in the context and who bears the blame for the hatred and violence. Like SVT, TV4's news anchors are pulling their weight by questioning whether in the future permission should really be given for demonstrations that risk irritating Muslims.
Part 3
Silent about immigration and Islam
Not a word does Möller on Facebook or the Minister of Justice to TV4 touch on the deeper problem that large parts of a religion's practitioners fully and firmly believe that the violence and vandalism they are now staging is a completely justified and proportionate reaction to someone burning a book. . Not in a word do they touch on the irresponsible mass immigration policy and failed integration policy that is objectively the overriding reason why this kind of religious-political violence has established itself in Sweden. The policy for which Möller and Johansson's party bears a heavy, albeit not sole, responsibility.
It is a toxic association of imported religious ideology and Swedish politics that has claimed worse victims than the ten or so police officers who were injured during the weekend's riots. Recently, it was the fifth anniversary of the Muslim terrorist attack on Drottninggatan in Stockholm, where the fundamentalist Rakhmat Akilov, at the urging of IS and in revenge for rejecting the asylum application with a stolen truck, mowed down and massacred a large number of Swedes. Among the victims was ten-year-old Ebba Åkerlund.
The reign of terror of the shadow caliphate is as effective as sharia
That terrorist attack is just the tip of the iceberg for how many Swedes have been killed, beaten, robbed, raped, robbed and subjected to a long list of other serious crimes by a perpetrator who was let into Sweden by the country's ruling politicians. Similarly, the riots we have witnessed in recent days in Sweden have the same religious-political motives as the massacre of the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo, the beheading of teacher Samuel Paty in the open street in Paris and the wave of Muslim terror that has swept across Europe in recent decades. And it is a left-liberal immigration policy similar to the Swedish that has opened the door to this violence.
In Sweden, it is this policy and the threat from this violence that forced Lars Vilks to live with police bodyguard protection 24 hours a day for having drawn a satirical drawing of the Muslim prophet Muhammad as a patrol dog. No Swedish mainstream media even dared to show the picture when Vilks recently died under mysterious circumstances in a violent explosion and car crash. We do not have sharia law in Sweden (yet) but the informal Muslim shadow caliphate that terrified us Swedes is doing almost the same service.
Part 4
Democracy is dismantled when politicians want to hide their misrule
It is understandable that the politicians responsible for this monumental misrule now want to do everything in their power to hide the consequences, even if it means a far-reaching dismantling of democracy, and that the media establishment that helped politicians driving society to the brink of ruin now also makes itself available to them in sweeping the tracks again.
Together, these politicians and journalists have developed a skill in speaking new languages to shuffle the cards. It was first applied to the migration policy pursued and the multiculturalist social engineering project presented as both economically and culturally enriching while its critics were branded as racists. New language is now being used to portray the restrictions on our civil liberties and rights as a virtue, as a defense and protection of democracy instead of the threat to it that it is really about.
The Russian threat is being exploited to turn a blind eye to the internal threat
The domestic political threat from violent Islam and other immigration-related crime and the threat of democracy from the political and media establishment that wants to hide the truth about its own misrule risks being overshadowed in the upcoming election campaign by a discussion of an external threat from Russia.
Although the Putin threat is worth taking seriously, we will see a conscious agenda where this is magnified by the establishment in general and the Social Democratic government in particular while the domestic political threats are played down and described as racist conspiracy theories. It is with this tactic that the incumbent government intends to stay in power and neutralize its social conservative challengers.
Many who neither can nor want to fit into Swedish society
In a post on Facebook , the area police Björn in Motala expresses disappointment at how parts of the authority he works for have acted. He writes that " democracy and the constitution in recent days have taken a real hit " on how the democratic society has fallen away from the Muslim religious-political extremist violence.
Björn further writes that " we must stand up for democracy and freedom of expression ". That a large part of the country's immigrant Muslims neither can nor want to fit into such a society, they have with all the desired clarity themselves confirmed time and time again. Why people with such values sought refuge in a country like ours is a mystery, at least if one accepts the current doctrine that they have come all the way here as refugees from war and oppression in the longing for peace and democracy.
A change of government is required for massive repatriation
This weekend's riots show that they do not appreciate living in a peaceful or democratic society. The gratitude one should be able to expect from a distressed refugee towards the people who have hospitably and generously opened the door to their country wide open also shines with their absence. Getting these people out of Sweden and back to their former homeland or other country with a culture and government that better suits their feelings and values should be a priority goal.
For this to happen, however, we must first get rid of the current government, which also does not fit into a democratic society, and replace it with one that does. It can be difficult because it is really only a parliamentary party, SD, which has a truly democratic backbone and which lacks a political past one can be tempted to want to hide by interfering in democracy.
But it's starting to get urgent. The question “ How much immigration can Sweden tolerate? ”Was asked by SVT in a party leader debate already ten years ago and was relevant even then. Today - one million residence permits later - there is hardly a more urgent question to ask.