YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #libtards #communism #terrorism #trafficsafety #assaultcar
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Classic Rock Lovers
Classic Rock Lovers  
19 hrs

Favicon 
www.classicrockhistory.com

Complete List Of The Pretenders Band Members

The Pretenders formed in March 1978 in London when American-born Chrissie Hynde recruited British musicians to realize her musical vision after years of unsuccessful attempts to find her place in the punk scene. The original band consisted of Chrissie Hynde on lead vocals and rhythm guitar, James Honeyman-Scott on lead guitar and keyboards, Pete Farndon on bass guitar, and Martin Chambers on drums. The band took their name from the Platters song “The Great Pretender,” which was a favorite of one of Hynde’s former boyfriends. Following the tragic drug-related deaths of Honeyman-Scott in 1982 and Farndon in 1983, the band The post Complete List Of The Pretenders Band Members appeared first on ClassicRockHistory.com.
Like
Comment
Share
SciFi and Fantasy
SciFi and Fantasy  
19 hrs

Dust Bunny Trailer: Bryan Fuller and Mads Mikkelsen Reunite in Wild Fright Night-Style Adventure
Favicon 
reactormag.com

Dust Bunny Trailer: Bryan Fuller and Mads Mikkelsen Reunite in Wild Fright Night-Style Adventure

News Dust Bunny Dust Bunny Trailer: Bryan Fuller and Mads Mikkelsen Reunite in Wild Fright Night-Style Adventure Maybe it’s not the exact Hannibal reunion we’ve been waiting for, but we accept it all the same. By Molly Templeton | Published on September 8, 2025 Screenshot: Lionsgate Films Comment 0 Share New Share Screenshot: Lionsgate Films In this house, the statement in the headline is enough to have many of us rushing to the internet to see if tickets are available yet. Dust Bunny marks Bryan Fuller’s feature film directorial debut, but you already know his work: from Pushing Daisies, from Wonderfalls, from Dead Like Me, from Hannibal—the much-loved, over-too-soon series that dug into Fuller’s reinterpretation of the relationship between Hannibal Lecter (played by an incredible Mads Mikkelsen) and special agent Will Graham (Hugh Dancy). Now, Fuller is back with Dust Bunny, which is all I needed to hear. But here’s the synopsis, should you need more convincing: Ten-year-old Aurora has a mysterious neighbor (Mads Mikkelsen) who kills real-life monsters. He’s a hit man for hire. So, when Aurora needs help killing the monster she believes ate her entire family, she procures his services. Suspecting that her parents may have fallen victim to assassins gunning for him, Aurora’s neighbor guiltily takes the job. Now, to protect her, he’ll need to battle an onslaught of assassins―and accept that some monsters are real. The trailer’s many charms include Mikkelsen in a yellow tracksuit with a sword, looking like a warped version of Uma Thurman in Kill Bill; a field of sunflowers absolutely dropped in to remind you of the brightness-and-death vibe of Pushing Daisies; and the kind of slightly magical, peculiarly heightened world that Fuller is so, so good at creating. It’s not our world, I’m pretty sure, but it’s not so different in some ways—one of them being that people seem to throw the term “monster” around willy-nilly without being super clear about what they mean by it. Dust Bunny co-stars Sophie Sloan as Aurora, and also features Sigourney Weaver (firing high heel guns?) and David Dastmalchian. It’s in theaters December 5.[end-mark] The post <i>Dust Bunny</i> Trailer: Bryan Fuller and Mads Mikkelsen Reunite in Wild <i>Fright Night</i>-Style Adventure appeared first on Reactor.
Like
Comment
Share
SciFi and Fantasy
SciFi and Fantasy  
19 hrs

Five Books That Just Said To Hell With the Speed-of-Light Barrier
Favicon 
reactormag.com

Five Books That Just Said To Hell With the Speed-of-Light Barrier

Books reading recommendations Five Books That Just Said To Hell With the Speed-of-Light Barrier Relativity, Schmelativity. Einstein was probably wrong, anyway. By James Davis Nicoll | Published on September 8, 2025 Comment 0 Share New Share The speed of light is a vexing plot impediment for any SF author who wants their characters to zip off to another star system and come back without finding a much-transformed world when they return home. No surprise that this bold assertion on The Association for Space Propulsion Development site caught my eye. These experimental data (VERIFIED SEVERAL TIMES) demonstrate that the thrust of a PNN propulsion spaceship can be incredibly increased OVER TIME with the same power used, inevitably exceeding the speed of light. This courageous proposal raises many questions, such as why nobody has ever suggested circumventing the light-speed barrier simply by going very, very fast. After all, the only impediments are some trifling engineering details, which the ASPD is working on, and the laws of physics. In fact, people have proposed this before. Take these five examples. “Space Rats of the CCC” by Harry Harrison (1974) The focus of Harrison’s story is the process by which candidates are transformed from raw recruits into stalwarts of the Cosmic Camel Corps—or more often, into dismembered corpses. Nevertheless, the means by which faster-than-light travel was attained is explained so clearly I will eschew my usual chronological approach to place the Harrison first: When the inventor, Patsy Kelly, was asked how ships could move at seven times the speed of light when the limiting velocity of matter, according to Einstein, was the speed of light, he responded in his droll Goidelic way, with a shrug, “Well—sure and I guess Einstein was wrong.” To be fair, if we noticed phenomena that could not fit into the standard model, some new model would be required. The obvious historical examples are the matter of Mercury’s precession and the invariance of the speed of light, both of which presented seemingly insurmountable challenges to Newtonian physics. That doesn’t seem to be quite how Kelly managed the trick, though. The Skylark of Space by E.E. “Doc” Smith (1928) Focused as it is on super-science, industrial espionage, kidnapping, and breakneck adventure in deepest space, Skylark does not have room for a detailed explanation as to how the speed of light could be exceeded. In fact, there’s no explanation at all, only the observation that it has been. “Three hundred and fifty million miles. Halfway out of the solar system. That means a constant acceleration of about one light.” “Nothing can go that fast, Mart. E equals M C squared.” “Einstein’s Theory is still a theory. This distance is an observed fact.” “And theories are modified to fit facts. Hokay.” It’s hard to argue with observation, although it is a bit of pity that there’s no room to detail what model should supersede Einstein’s. I am inexplicably reminded of Edgar Rice Burrough’s repost concerning certain inconsistencies between Mars as astronomers thought it to be and ERB’s Barsoom, that the scientists only had remote observation to go on, while ERB’s John Carter had actually been to Mars. Islands in Space: The Challenge of the Planetoids by Dandridge M. Cole & Donald W. Cox (1964) Although this non-fiction text focuses primarily on asteroids, and the case for exploring and exploiting them, as well as suggestions as to how this might be done, in Chapter 17 (“By Planetoid to the Stars”), the authors do touch briefly on that whole thing with the light-speed barrier, about which the authors appear quite skeptical. Maybe the consistent results from decades of experiments are misleading! If relativity has been found to be correct in all these cases, then it would seem that it must really be a universal law of nature. But again, we call on P.W. Bridgman—“Experience is determined only by experience. This practically means that we must give up the demand that all nature be embraced in any formula, either simple or complicated.” And now we note a certain basic similarity in all the tests of the relativity theory. They all involve objects, particles, or radiation, moving at high speed with respect to an accelerating, decelerating, or otherwise perturbing, external electromagnetic, or gravitational field. We come now to the significant point that the high-speed rocket is not accelerated by an external field! The mechanism of rocket acceleration is fundamentally different in character from any of the phenomena which have been used to check relativity! We cannot assume that the simple formula which holds in one natural realm will hold in this fundamentally new domain. However, as they point out, relativity is only an issue for people who want to make round trips. Your Nearly as Fast as Light voyageur need never concern themselves with the phenomenon, provided they never return. While some may find Cole and Cox’s case against Einstein somewhat short of compelling, I do recommend the text. Readers will find there, in their original form, many of the proposals for space development to be found in more recent space advocacy books. Citizen of the Galaxy by Robert A. Heinlein (1957) Whereas Heinlein dabbled in relativity in his 1956 Time for the Stars, his ambitions for Citizen—which is a spy novel, a Norton-style Free Trader novel, a barracks drama, and a boardroom drama all in one—left no room for Einsteinian flourishes. Instead, Citizen’s starships exceed the speed of light through the simple expedient of brute force and purely Newtonian acceleration1: But a ship which speeds up by a kilometer per second each second will take three and one half standard days to reach speed of light. Exactly why Einstein’s model does not apply is left to the reader’s imagination, as is how exactly one accelerates a starship at a kilometer per second cheaply enough (or at all) for interstellar trade to be reasonable. The plot requires that this be possible, so it is. Heinlein fans may be interested to know that Citizen is slated for an animated adaptation under director Jay Oliva, with a script by Luke Lieberman. Orbitsville by Bob Shaw (1975) Vance Garamond’s life would actually be better if the flickerwing starships Vance pilots were relativistic, as that would allow him to use the Lorentz-Fitzgerald contraction to escape space oligarch Elizabeth Lindstrom’s wrath for having inadvertently allowed Linstrom’s child to fall to his death. As it is, Vance can only flee through space, not time, and there is nowhere in space where Lindstrom’s influence will not eventually reach. And why does Einstein not apply? (W)hen a body of appreciable mass and gravitic field reached speeds approaching .2c it entered new frames of reference. Once a ship crossed the threshold velocity it created its own portable universe in which different rules applied, and it appeared that the great universal constant was not the speed of light. I suspect that “appreciable” is a load-bearing term in that exposition. The go very very fast approach to superluminal flight is so obvious, the examples above are only a very small sample. Why, I didn’t even mention Beckman’s classic Einstein Plus Two! Undoubtedly, I may have overlooked your favourite examples. Extol their virtues in comments below.[end-mark] Heinlein had dabbled in relativity-skepticism before, in Farmer in the Sky.“Mr. Ortega, admitting that you can’t pass the speed of light, what would happen if the Star Rover got up close to the speed of light—and then the Captain suddenly stepped the drive up to about six g and held it there?”“Why, it would—No, let’s put it this way—” He broke off and grinned; it made him look real young.“See here, kid, don’t ask me questions like that. I’m an engineer with hairy ears, not a mathematical physicist.” He looked thoughtful and added, “Truthfully, I don’t know what would happen, but I would sure give a pretty to find out. Maybe we would find out what the square root of minus one looks like—from the inside.” ︎The post Five Books That Just Said To Hell With the Speed-of-Light Barrier appeared first on Reactor.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
19 hrs

BREAKING: Trump Announces New Guidance Protecting the Right to Prayer in Schools
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

BREAKING: Trump Announces New Guidance Protecting the Right to Prayer in Schools

President Donald Trump announced that the Department of Education will issue new guidance protecting the right to prayer in public schools. “To have a great nation you have to have religion,” Trump said at the second meeting of the Religious Liberty Commission at the Museum of the Bible Monday morning. Trump honored students whose religious liberties had reportedly been violated at public school. A young boy named Shane spoke about being required to read a book about transgender ideology at school. His parents complained, and the boy was bullied at school. “I believe kids like me should be able to live our faith at school without being forced to go against what we believe,” he said. “I hope no other family has to go through what mine did.” He also honored a high schooler named Hannah who was punished for praying at school for an injured classmate. The crowd cheers as @POTUS takes the stage at the meeting of the Presidential Religious Liberty Commission. “America was founded on faith…When faith gets weaker, our country seems to get weaker. When faith gets stronger…good things happen for our country.” pic.twitter.com/XiYlt6gFsm— Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell (@TheElizMitchell) September 8, 2025 Trump also slammed Sen. Tim Kaine for his comments last week that rights from government, rather than God. “The ineffectual senator from Virginia, man named Tim Kaine, stated that the notion our rights come from our creator is, quote, ‘extremely troubling to him,’” Trump said. “But as everyone in this room understands, it is tyrants who are denying our rights and the rights that come from God, and it’s this Declaration of Independence that proclaims we’re endowed by our creator with the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” the president added. “The senator from Virginia should be ashamed of himself.” ?REJECTING THE DECLARATIONThis week, Sen. Tim Kaine flipped the central principle of the Declaration of Independence on its head. He got religious freedom exactly wrong.?1/7 pic.twitter.com/RZZiRjdSsX— Tyler O'Neil (@Tyler2ONeil) September 7, 2025 Trump invited Housing and Urban Development Secretary Scott Turner to take the stage. He announced the administration’s new “America Prays” initiative, which calls on Americans to dedicate time every week to pray for the country. “What if believers all across this great nation got together with 10 people, friends, family members, colleagues, work associates, 10 people each week to pray for our country and for our fellow citizens?” Turner said. Turner invited all Americans to pray for the renewal of the country. “Think about the miracles that would take place over the next year,” he continued. “Think about the transformation that you and I could witness in communities all across the land: sons returning to their fathers, daughters returning to their mothers, families coming back together, health being restored, financial needs being met, mountains being moved. ???@sturnerofficial announces America Prays initiative to a cheering crowd. “What if believers all across this great nation got together with 10 people, friends, family members, colleagues, work, associates, 10 people each week to pray for our country and for our fellow… pic.twitter.com/i0S5Zbq090— Elizabeth Troutman Mitchell (@TheElizMitchell) September 8, 2025 The post BREAKING: Trump Announces New Guidance Protecting the Right to Prayer in Schools appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
19 hrs

California Insiders Eye Sen. Alex Padilla for Gubernatorial Race
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

California Insiders Eye Sen. Alex Padilla for Gubernatorial Race

Prominent California Democrat strategists are eyeing Sen. Alex Padilla, D-Calif., for a bid to be the next governor of California.  The longtime California politician is seen as a reliable and known quantity in the state’s uber-left politics at a time when Democrats face historic unpopularity. “This is an uncertain time for California, and Alex Padilla brings certainty and stability,” California lobbyist Afrack Vargas, told Politico.  Padilla garnered national attention in June for disrupting a press conference by Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem. At the press gaggle, Padilla actively disregarded instructions from Noem’s security team. He subsequently was removed from the room where the press conference was happening and put in handcuffs. Some of his Senate colleagues were less than impressed with his behavior. “You can’t show up without your pin, refuse to announce yourself, and lunge at a Cabinet secretary. It doesn’t matter who you are,” Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., who has launched his own campaign to be a state governor, posted on X. Yet the incident earned Padilla national press coverage and the solidarity of his fellow Senate Democrats. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said the footage of Padilla’s conflict with Noem’s security “sickened his stomach,” and Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., noted that he was “disgusted by what I saw.” Padilla has spent decades climbing his way up the political ladder serving as a member and president of the Los Angeles City Council, a California state senator, and then California’s secretary of state until his appointment by Gov. Gavin Newsom to finish out the term of Sen. Kamala Harris after she was elected vice president in 2020. He was elected to a full term in the Senate in 2022 and therefore would not have to forfeit his Senate seat if he chose to seek the state office. The Democratic Party gubernatorial primary is on June 2, 2026 The current frontrunner in the polls is former California congresswoman Katie Porter. An ardent progressive, Porter co-chaired her former professor Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren’s failed 2020 presidential campaign and earned fame for taking bank CEOs to task in House hearings. She is reportedly seen by some California politicos as too left-wing a candidate even by California standards.  “There’s a lot of the chattering class of Sacramento who haven’t yet been enamored with some of the other candidates,” Democrat consultant Andrew Acosta told Politico.But is Padilla even interested in succeeding Newsom as governor? Politico reports he “ducked and dodged queries” on the matter. “I love California,” he told the outlet, “I’ve had the privilege and the honor of serving in so many different capacities … I’ve tried to do my best to help improve people’s lives, so hope to continue to serve in some capacity for the foreseeable future.” The post California Insiders Eye Sen. Alex Padilla for Gubernatorial Race appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
19 hrs

Murder in the Stuart Court: The Scandal That Threatened a Dynasty
Favicon 
www.historyhit.com

Murder in the Stuart Court: The Scandal That Threatened a Dynasty

Four centuries ago, a shocking death in the Tower of London became a national sensation. It was a story of a brilliant lawyer, a lovesick royal favourite, a scorned noblewoman, and a plot so intricate and scandalous it threatened to topple the monarchy. The details were whispered in the streets, debated by foreign ambassadors, and devoured by a public fascinated by true crime. This was the murder of Sir Thomas Overbury. In this special episode of the Tudor True Crime mini-series on History Hit’s podcast, Not Just the Tudors, Professor Suzannah Lipscomb steps into the shadows to uncover the truth. Joined by Professor Alastair Bellany, an expert on the Jacobean court, she investigates not just who killed Overbury, but why this singular act of murder exposed a web of intrigue and corruption that compromised the Stuart throne. Subscribe to Not Just The Tudors A fatal friendship Thomas Overbury was an ambitious lawyer, poet, and man on the make. His rise to power wasn’t a result of high birth, but from his friendship with a young Scottish courtier named Robert Carr, who he met in the early 1600s. By 1607, Carr had become the most favoured man in King James I’s court, and through Carr, Overbury suddenly had access to unimaginable power and influence, becoming the silent hand behind the throne. But in 1611, this powerful friendship soured when Carr began a passionate affair with the married Frances Howard, the Countess of Essex. Overbury, fearing this new alliance would jeopardise his own political standing, voiced his opposition. By doing so, he insulted the Countess, alienated his best friend, and, in a series of unwise moves, earned the displeasure of the king. King James I, weary of Overbury’s influence and arrogance, offered him an ambassadorship – a seemingly generous offer that was, in reality, a gilded cage designed to remove him from court. When Overbury refused, the king was outraged, and in April 1613, he ordered his former favourite’s imprisonment in the Tower of London. Overbury assumed his stay would be brief, that his friend Carr would secure his release. But Carr and Frances had other plans – they were plotting to remove the “Overbury problem” permanently. Left: Portrait of Robert Carr, Earl of Somerset. Right: Frances Howard, Countess of Somerset Death, conspiracy, and a cover-up On 14 September 1613, Thomas Overbury died in the Tower of London, just months after his imprisonment. Initially, his death was seen as unremarkable, a tragic but unlamented end for a man with many enemies. Rumours spread that he had died of disease, and his body was buried and forgotten. A year later, Robert Carr, now elevated to the Earl of Somerset, married the newly divorced Frances Howard in a lavish ceremony. The couple, with their powerful Howard family allies, seemed to have won. But their victory was short-lived. A new favourite had caught the king’s eye – George Villiers. As the political tides began to turn against Carr, a stunning revelation emerged: the Lieutenant of the Tower confessed he’d been told of a plot to murder Overbury. Suddenly, a forgotten death became the centrepiece of a sensational murder investigation. As Professor Alastair Bellany explains, the king’s judges soon uncovered a plot of stunning proportions, finding that Frances Howard had arranged for an array of poisoned sweets and other goods to be smuggled into the Tower. The less powerful conspirators were tried and executed, but the main protagonists – Frances Howard and Robert Carr – were mysteriously pardoned by the king after they were convicted. (Frances Howard had admitted a part in Overbury’s murder, but her husband had not.) This verdict infuriated many, raising suspicions of a deeper cover-up. The Stuart monarchy on trial In the podcast, Alastair describes how the scandal surrounding the Overbury affair became a media sensation, with an underground system of handwritten letters and libellous poems circulating gossip and raising damning questions about the king himself.  The scandal became a battle of competing narratives. As Alastair explains, the official line from the king was one of royal justice, portraying James I as a righteous monarch who bravely unearthed a heinous plot and punished the guilty. However, the underground media painted a different picture, portraying the aristocrats involved in the scandal as depraved and corrupt. The scandal’s deepest secret was the implicit question it asked: how could such a corrupt individual as Carr rise to immense power? The answer, many whispered, was a scandalous relationship with the king himself. Left: King James I. Right: George Villiers – one of the king’s ‘favourites’ along with Robert Carr.Image Credit: Left: Portrait by John de Critz (1551–1642); Right: Portrait by Peter Paul Rubens (1577–1640). Both: Public Domain The Overbury affair eroded the image of James as a wise, moral monarch. The decision to spare the aristocratic murderers compromised the king’s carefully constructed narrative, leaving the public to wonder if he was a righteous arbiter of justice or a compromised accomplice. The Overbury Affair also exposed deep political contradictions within the court and was the first major case in which a “Popish plot” to undermine the Stuart dynasty was centred inside the royal court. A widespread conspiracy theory, dubbed ‘The Powder Poison’, circulated, claiming Overbury’s death was part of a larger Catholic plot to poison the entire royal family.  This rumour, however over-the-top, was believed by many because of the Catholic connections of Frances Howard’s family. The ease with which such a plot could be imagined inside the king’s own court was politically explosive, and set a dangerous precedent for the decades to come, as anxiety about Catholic infiltration of the court continued to grow, a political dynamic that would later contribute to the English Civil War. Join Professor Suzannah Lipscomb and Professor Alastair Bellany as they unravel one of Tudor history’s most sensational true crime cases. Listen to the latest episode of Not Just the Tudors. Subscribe to Not Just The Tudors
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
19 hrs

Mamdani to Big Money NYers: You'll Be Happy to Pay For a Better Big Apple, or Something
Favicon 
hotair.com

Mamdani to Big Money NYers: You'll Be Happy to Pay For a Better Big Apple, or Something

Mamdani to Big Money NYers: You'll Be Happy to Pay For a Better Big Apple, or Something
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
19 hrs

Starmer, Who Arrests Grannies for Xweets, Is Too Weak to Fire His Own Energy Secretary
Favicon 
hotair.com

Starmer, Who Arrests Grannies for Xweets, Is Too Weak to Fire His Own Energy Secretary

Starmer, Who Arrests Grannies for Xweets, Is Too Weak to Fire His Own Energy Secretary
Like
Comment
Share
Science Explorer
Science Explorer
19 hrs

Tiny 2.5-Micrometer Particles Of Air Pollutants Can Promote Certain Types Of Dementia
Favicon 
www.iflscience.com

Tiny 2.5-Micrometer Particles Of Air Pollutants Can Promote Certain Types Of Dementia

The fight against dementia begins with clean air.
Like
Comment
Share
Science Explorer
Science Explorer
19 hrs

Ants Have Taken Over Most Of The World – Except For A Few Places
Favicon 
www.iflscience.com

Ants Have Taken Over Most Of The World – Except For A Few Places

They've colonized almost every landmass on Earth.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 120 out of 89870
  • 116
  • 117
  • 118
  • 119
  • 120
  • 121
  • 122
  • 123
  • 124
  • 125
  • 126
  • 127
  • 128
  • 129
  • 130
  • 131
  • 132
  • 133
  • 134
  • 135
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund