YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #bible #freespeech #censorship #facebook #jesus #americafirst #patriotism #culture #fuckdiversity
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Night mode toggle
Featured Content
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
1 w

19-year-old drove for 22 hours straight to kidnap 2 underage girls he met on Roblox game, police say
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

19-year-old drove for 22 hours straight to kidnap 2 underage girls he met on Roblox game, police say

Florida police said they worked quickly to identify a 19-year-old man who allegedly drove 1,500 miles to kidnap two sisters he met on Roblox and spoke with on Snapchat.The sisters, 12 and 14 years old, were reported missing from their home in Indiantown on Saturday, which led to a multi-state search by local and federal law enforcement authorities.'There is no application online that is safe. If you can communicate with someone away from your house in the quiet of your own room, it can be a problem. So parents have to be vigilant.'They were found by the Georgia Highway Patrol the next day when they pulled over a vehicle they believed the sisters were in.Martin County Sheriff John Budensiek said the man was identified as Hser Mu Lah Say, who had driven 22 straight hours from Nebraska down to Florida on Friday."We're dealing with a grown man that drove all the way from another state, an individual they had never met in person, picked them up, and we really don't know what he was gonna do," Budensiek said.Surveillance video helped police identify the car Say was driving. They provided images of the man in what appeared to be a convenience store.Say was charged with two counts of kidnapping and three counts of interference of child custody. Budensiek said the man may face additional charges.The sheriff made it a point to say the girls were "rescued" from the "scenario that they had placed themselves in."The Roblox game is widely popular among children but has been criticized for not doing enough to keep predators away from underage users. The company released a statement about the latest incident."We are investigating this deeply troubling incident and will fully support law enforcement," the company statement reads."Roblox has robust safety policies to protect users that go beyond many other platforms, and advanced safeguards that monitor for harmful content and communications," it added. "We have filters designed to block the sharing of personal information, don't allow user-to-user image or video sharing, and recently rolled out age checks globally to limit kids and teens to chatting with others their age by default. While no system is perfect, our commitment to safety never ends, and we continue to strengthen protections to keep users safe."RELATED: 14-year-old girls that went missing from sleepover were forced into prostitution by men they met online, police say Budensiek warned parents to monitor their children's use of online apps."There is no application online that's safe. If you can communicate with someone away from your house in the quiet of your own room, it can be a problem. So parents have to be vigilant," he said.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
1 w

Civil courts check the powerful. This Republican wants them weaker.
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Civil courts check the powerful. This Republican wants them weaker.

A new bill before Congress claims it will curb lawsuit abuse. It won’t. In reality, it will limit ordinary Americans’ access to civil courts.The Protect Third Party Litigation Funding from Abuse Act, sponsored by Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.), would force plaintiffs in “any civil action” to disclose “the identity of any person (other than counsel of record) that has a legal right to receive any payment or thing of value” from the case.Third-party funding is not clogging courts. It expands access to justice.Plaintiffs would need to provide that information to defendants and the court. Anyone with a functioning brain can see what will happen next: The names leak, activists and corporate PR shops pick targets, and the people financing the lawsuit get punished for it.If that sounds like a blackmail scheme, it is. And it would be perfectly legal.Third-party litigation funding works like this: An individual, company, or organization advances money to a plaintiff or law firm to cover the costs of a lawsuit. In exchange, the funder receives a share of any judgment or settlement. If the plaintiff loses, the funder gets nothing.The arrangement exists for a reason. Lawsuits can be expensive. Complex cases require investigators, expert witnesses, depositions, document review, and months or years of legal work. Deep-pocketed defendants know they can bury a plaintiff under delays, discovery fights, and endless motions while the meter runs at hundreds (sometimes thousands) of dollars an hour.Litigation funding helps level that field. It gives plaintiffs a fighting chance against defendants who can afford to grind them down.Issa calls this “abuse” because hedge funds and speculators sometimes fund cases in hopes of a return. “We believe that if a third-party investor is financing a lawsuit in federal court, it should be disclosed rather than hidden from the world,” Issa said when he announced the bill.That sounds reasonable only if you ignore what trials are for.A civil trial asks three questions: Did the defendant do what the plaintiff alleges? Did the defendant’s actions cause harm? If so, what were the damages (if any)? The identity of a funder does not help a jury answer any of them. If anything, it distracts from the merits and invites a side show: the defendant arguing the plaintiff is a puppet and the case is illegitimate because someone with money helped pay the bills. That argument deserves no special protection.What counts is what the defendant did or didn’t do and whether it hurt the plaintiff. Who finances the plaintiff’s lawyers doesn’t change the facts of the case.RELATED: A one-way national divorce: Anarchy for them, coercion for us Cemile Bingol via iStock/Getty ImagesA successful plaintiff also has the right to spend an award as he or she chooses, including paying debts and obligations incurred to bring the case. Issa’s bill would chill that option by scaring off funders through forced disclosure. The bill doesn’t touch defendants, who can hire every white-shoe law firm on the planet. It targets the side that usually needs help.Issa’s bill also pretends it’s solving a crisis that doesn’t exist. The number of lawsuits filed each year in the United States, at both state and federal levels, has fallen by roughly one-third since 2012, according to Consumer Shield. Meanwhile fewer than 1% of state civil cases go to trial, and fewer than 2% of federal civil cases do. Most settle or get dismissed. Third-party funding is not clogging courts. It expands access to justice.The bill also reaches far beyond any plausible federal interest. Federal cases account for only about 1.4% of civil litigation nationwide. States already have authority to regulate litigation funding — and some have. As of July 2025, seven states — Indiana, Kansas, Louisiana, Montana, Oklahoma, West Virginia, and Wisconsin — had regulations governing litigation funding, according to the Washington Legal Foundation. The fact that most states haven’t bothered tells you what lawmakers think: This isn’t a pressing problem.The broader claim — that litigation funding drives frivolous suits — fails under scrutiny. A 2022 report from the U.S. Government Accountability Office found funders vet cases carefully and avoid interfering in litigation. They do that for a simple reason: They get paid only if the claim succeeds. The report put it plainly: “Funders select the most meritorious cases to fund because they only receive returns when claims are successful.”Economic reality imposes its own discipline. Third-party funding does not “abuse” the system. It democratizes access to it.Issa’s bill would do the opposite. By threatening people who finance lawsuits, it would tilt the playing field further toward big corporations and the ultra-wealthy — the parties most able to outspend and outlast everyone else.Like it or not, civil suits help keep a free society free. They allow ordinary people to hold powerful actors accountable for harm. Restricting access to courts doesn’t stop abuse. It increases it — by giving the powerful more insulation from consequences. That’s the kind of “reform” Americans don’t need.
Like
Comment
Share
Science Explorer
Science Explorer
1 w

Every major galaxy is speeding away from the Milky Way, except one — and we finally know why
Favicon 
www.livescience.com

Every major galaxy is speeding away from the Milky Way, except one — and we finally know why

A vast, flat sheet of dark matter may solve the long-standing mystery of why our neighboring galaxy Andromeda is speeding toward us while our other neighbors are moving away from us.
Like
Comment
Share
YubNub News
YubNub News
1 w

Matthew Stafford Edges Drake Maye for AP NFL Most Valuable Player Award
Favicon 
yubnub.news

Matthew Stafford Edges Drake Maye for AP NFL Most Valuable Player Award

Los Angeles Rams' Matthew Stafford accepts the AP Most Valuable Player award during the NFL Honors award show in San Francisco on Feb. 5, 2026. Charlie Riedel/AP PhotoSAN FRANCISCO—Matthew Stafford…
Like
Comment
Share
YubNub News
YubNub News
1 w

Virginia House Democrats Pass Sweeping New Gun Control Measures Over Powerless Republicans’ Objections
Favicon 
yubnub.news

Virginia House Democrats Pass Sweeping New Gun Control Measures Over Powerless Republicans’ Objections

© 2026 The New York Sun Company, LLC. All rights reserved.Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The material on this site is protected by copyright law and may…
Like
Comment
Share
YubNub News
YubNub News
1 w

What to Know About the Chicago Bears’ Quest to Build a New Stadium
Favicon 
yubnub.news

What to Know About the Chicago Bears’ Quest to Build a New Stadium

The Chicago Bears fight song contains the words, “You’re the pride and joy of Illinois.”But might they move to Indiana? This is one of many questions facing the storied NFL franchise as it looks…
Like
Comment
Share
YubNub News
YubNub News
1 w

Rhamondre Stevenson Credits Pats Coaching Staff for Sticking by Him When His Father Died
Favicon 
yubnub.news

Rhamondre Stevenson Credits Pats Coaching Staff for Sticking by Him When His Father Died

Rhamondre Stevenson #38 of the New England Patriots addresses the media prior to Super Bowl LX at the Santa Clara Marriott in Santa Clara, Calif., on Feb. 4, 2026. Thearon W. Henderson/Getty ImagesNew…
Like
Comment
Share
YubNub News
YubNub News
1 w

NTD Good Morning Full Broadcast (Feb. 6)
Favicon 
yubnub.news

NTD Good Morning Full Broadcast (Feb. 6)

[View Article at Source] 
Like
Comment
Share
Entertainment News
Entertainment News
1 w

Bunny B. Goode
Favicon 
www.washingtonexaminer.com

Bunny B. Goode

The primal American rock song ends in prophecy: A shack-dwelling, near-illiterate from the middle of nowhere will play for packed nightclubs instead of railroad drifters, and Johnny B. Goode, son of the evergreens and the swamps, will see his name in lights. Does the prophecy come true? We suspect it might.  And on some level, we are obligated to believe that it will. In America, the line between nothing and everything and nowhere and somewhere — the line between, for instance, a grocery store in an obscure town in Puerto Rico and the biggest stage in all of music — is supposed to be thinner than anywhere else on Earth. That stage exists for only 15 minutes each year, during the Super Bowl halftime show. The obscure Puerto Rican town I have in mind is Vega Baja, which is even lower on the American scale than southern Louisiana. It was there that Benito Antonio Martínez Ocasio, son of a local truck driver and school teacher, worked checkout at an Econo supermarket while on break from the University of Puerto Rico at Arecibo, where he was studying communications in hopes of becoming a radio host. In 2016, by the last of his grocery-bagging days, Ocasio’s, known more widely as Bad Bunny, self-released music had scored him a record contract with San Juan tastemaker DJ Luian, and he was on his way toward a career-making joint single with the Columbian star Karol G. The 31-year-old is now the most commercially successful Spanish-language musician in history, the latest winner of the Grammy for album of the year, and by some metrics, the biggest pop star on Earth. Bad Bunny in San Juan, Puerto Rico, in September. (Getty Images) Those who are earnestly pissed about Bad Bunny playing the 2026 Super Bowl halftime show, and there are many, are not just wasting their emotion. They have forgotten their national inheritance. Americans should be thrilled that out-of-the-way places in their country, or at least in a territory with a disquietingly ambiguous relationship to their country, still produce artists like this. The critics of this booking probably have not actually listened to the artist they are attacking, which is their own sad loss. Sadder still is the attempt to counter-program Bad Bunny, as if it’s the duty of all good American patriots to ignore him. In one of its more ill-advised moves, Turning Points USA is throwing a Kid Rock-headlined alternative halftime show, with neither the talent nor the bookers aware of how tasteless the juxtaposition with the Puerto Rican phenom will make them all look. We are in one of those rare periods when the most musically interesting pop star on the planet is also the most popular, with 82 million monthly Spotify listeners and the ability to sell out venues worldwide. Bad Bunny is one of America’s few NFL-sized musicians, and one of the only ones who has used his stardom on anything artistically worthwhile. In 2018, just two years out of Vega Baja, Bad Bunny’s album X 100Pre upended global pop. Others had attempted the mix of ear-friendly melodic hip-hop and harder-driving Caribbean club rhythms that Bad Bunny instantly mastered. What made his major-label debut an inflection point in 21st-century music was its mass-scale introduction of an elusive, alluring new pop persona. Tropical ukulele slams into a tectonic bass rattle in the first 30 seconds of the album’s runtime, as a slurred and moody baritone croons in Spanish about how he is not doing particularly well or especially bad after a recent breakup — “ni bien, ni mal.” Bad Bunny is the voice of potentiality. There is always a chance his mopes and howls will give way to a brain-splitting explosion of fiery beats, which is the destination of the sublimely filthy “Safaera” from 2020, and the stripped-down rager “Titi Mi Pregunto” from 2022. He can have a slack, stoned delivery, stretching out long vowels to a near-moan. But his vocal wanderings often settle on an uncannily controlled expression of deep emotion. Debi Tirar Mas Fotos, Bad Bunny’s Grammy-winning album from last year, is a psychologized dual journey into his ascent to the stratosphere and the musical history of Puerto Rico. It did the kinds of things pop albums are not supposed to be able to do anymore, such as drive a five-minute track with a lengthy piano solo all the way to #3 on the Billboard Hot 100. That song, “Baile Inolvidable” (“Unforgettable Dance”) is an astonishing pop achievement, and the distance between it and any recent single from Taylor Swift or Sabrina Carpenter is almost comically vast. It begins with Bad Bunny plodding through a slowed-down version of his deepest possible moan over woozy arpeggiated synths. Sixty-seven seconds in, long enough to wonder if the song is actually going anywhere, the music lurches from digital to analogue; a sonic curtain bursts open, and an entire salsa band appears. The song accelerates as high-climbing trumpet harmonies and soul-smouldering bachata drums compete to out-blaze one another. Bad Bunny, newly alive, rips through a revved-up recapitulation of his gloomy opening phrase and finishes a thought introduced in the song’s downcast first movement: “Life is a party that one day ends,” he sings, “and you were my unforgettable dance.”  “Baile Inolvidable” is a unity of musical and emotional opposites, a two-part pop suite with a lethal groove and a real idea animating it: While there’s universality to the deeper pop themes, such as love and home and memory, the traditions that drive global revolutions in music come from very specific places, ones often beyond the conscious understanding of the listening public. That’s no knock on the public, much less an attempt to exclude them from the party — the best pop music invites its listeners in, as Bad Bunny’s does. You do not need to know anything about salsa, the intricacies of the eight-beat bachata scale, Puerto Rico, or the Spanish language to sense the power and ambition of “Baile Inolvidable.” Its massiveness of sound and feeling subsumes its particularities, even if they are what allow the song to exist. American music has always been strongly regional. You can trace recent national shifts in taste to specific neighborhoods in Atlanta, Milwaukee, or San Juan. To call Bad Bunny Vega Baja’s first entrance in the history books is, of course, an insult to beloved Hall of Fame catcher Pudge Rodriguez, who also grew up there. But at least some of the discomfort over Bad Bunny’s halftime show has to do with a nagging sense that Puerto Rico is foreign American property rather than a part of America per se, and that Bad Bunny’s music, in language and style, stretches the limits of a shared culture that was already in danger of bursting into incoherence. A decision to give scarce Super Bowl real estate to someone who does not sing in English might feel like betrayal, given that the NFL is the last truly monolithic force in American life. NOTHING’S SHOCKING These are unfounded fears. Bad Bunny’s halftime show does not spell the end of the American center, but hints that it can actually survive. The idea that the internet would flatten the entire world, erasing the distance between Thimphu and Tuscaloosa and unlocking the genius trapped in the peripheries of the human community, turned out to be one of the 21st century’s great overhyped sources of hope, closer to nervous self-bargaining in the face of changes no one really understood. In Bad Bunny’s case, the promise was real. The often-annihilating economies of cultural consumption found and elevated an artist from far off most of the world and the country’s mental map, someone who could embody the possibilities of an otherwise bewildering time. The 21st-century mind-state is a haze of disconnected digital inputs and chattering inner fears. In harmonizing sounds, histories, and the various sides of himself, Bad Bunny is the first and maybe only pop star who has turned our defining mental mixture into the stuff of worthwhile mass-market art. You, of course, have the option of looking at Bad Bunny and seeing only the things that are incomprehensible or unfamiliar: The Spanish lyrics, the chugh-cha-chug of the Latin trap beat, which delays or even inverts the emphases of traditional Western pop rhythms; the callbacks to artists and genres largely unknown beyond the Spanish-speaking Caribbean. But it is all in the service of music whose force most curious listeners can sense without having to listen that hard, and an artistry that any proud American would be insane to scorn. Armin Rosen is a New York-based reporter-at-large for Tablet.
Like
Comment
Share
Entertainment News
Entertainment News
1 w

The realities of residuals
Favicon 
www.washingtonexaminer.com

The realities of residuals

When I tell people that I have enjoyed a 30-year career writing and producing television comedies, and that one of them was the long-running hit sitcom, Cheers, I know what they are thinking. They are thinking, Boy, I’ll bet that guy is just living large on those residuals. Residuals, for those of you who are not in show business — though, to be honest, are we not all in show business, when you think about it? — are the per-episode payments a writer, actor, or director receives, pretty much forever, whenever that episode appears somewhere. Residual payments have a tight hold on the imagination of some people, and most of them assume that if you have enough episodes in rotation, you are in fat city. I know this because many people just come right out and ask. So, how much are we talking? They will demand to know. Like, you probably never have to work again, am I right? And some people are a little more discreet — their eyes flick up and down, taking in my watch, my shoes, and the glow of my complexion, and rapidly adding up the costs of each. Nice shoes, probably in the high six to seven hundreds, plus that watch is vintage, and it’s a Patek, OK, has wrinkles, so probably no Botox, but the neck skin is fairly OK, and the general skin tone says expensive moisturizers, hard to say about residual payments, maybe he just invested smart? (Getty Images) I often have to wait a few seconds for this to die down before the conversation resumes.  This is fine, really. I don’t mind it at all. I understand the human need to know exactly what everyone else has in the bank. But for the record, let me clarify that residual payments start out pretty high, about 90% of the original script fee a writer received, but after a few reruns and a foreign sale or two, the number starts to slide down a very long, slippery slope. Put it this way: In the final quarter of 2025, the residual payments accrued during my entire career were, roughly, zero. The quarter before that, I think they were around $30. And when I opened the envelope and saw the check for that amount, my immediate reaction was, 30 bucks! Sweet! Over the decades, I have been conditioned to expect less. So again, for the record, if you ever meet me and do the up-and-down scan: I inherited the watch. None of this, I hope, comes off as ingratitude. When I was working full-time in television, during the go-go 1990s and early 2000s, I fully admit that my compensation package was what economists might call irrational and unsustainable over-investment. Even as a squinty-eyed free-market libertarian, I can honestly say I am thrilled that some people still want to throw their money away, and when they are throwing it in my direction, the last thing I’m going to do is hand them a copy of Gary Becker’s Human Capital. All of this is to say, someone on Instagram is posting snippets from each episode of Cheers — he devotes a week’s worth of posts to each episode — and it’s found its way into my algorithm. I’m enjoying scrolling through the high points of my career, a few minutes at a time. What I am not doing, thanks to the loosey-goosey attitude of social media companies toward copyright infringement laws, is getting paid. And that’s fine with me, too. Because the amount I would receive for a fragment of a scene of a 30-year-old episode that appears on an ad-supported social-media platform is considerably smaller than the satisfaction I receive, and the dopamine hit I experience, when I come across a particularly good moment from a show I was involved with. It’s a fun and unexpected jolt of happiness. AN AGE OF BLUNDER Which I think I may have ruined, because last week I reposted a scene I was particularly proud of — short version: Woody is terrified that a visiting French lothario is going to steal his girlfriend — and one of my followers on Instagram, who is also an executive at Paramount Global, which owns the rights to Cheers (at least, as of this writing; you never know), immediately messaged me to say that he’s alerted his colleagues to this infringement and they are going to put a stop to it at once. You should be getting paid for this, he said, clearly thinking he was doing me a favor. But there are some things worth more than a quarterly residuals payment. As long as that payment is lower than $30. Rob Long is a television writer and producer, including as a screenwriter and executive producer on Cheers, and the co-founder of Ricochet.com.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 1418 out of 110246
  • 1414
  • 1415
  • 1416
  • 1417
  • 1418
  • 1419
  • 1420
  • 1421
  • 1422
  • 1423
  • 1424
  • 1425
  • 1426
  • 1427
  • 1428
  • 1429
  • 1430
  • 1431
  • 1432
  • 1433
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund