YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #police #humor #law #biology #arizona
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Day mode
  • © 2025 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
News Feed (Home) Popular Posts Events Blog Market Forum
Media
Go LIVE! Headline News VidWatch Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore Offers
© 2025 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Group

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Daily Wire Feed
Daily Wire Feed
1 w

B-2 Stealth Bombers Reportedly On The Move To U.S. Base In Guam As Trump Mulls Iran Strike
Favicon 
www.dailywire.com

B-2 Stealth Bombers Reportedly On The Move To U.S. Base In Guam As Trump Mulls Iran Strike

B-2 stealth bombers reportedly appear to be on the move to a U.S. Air Force base in Guam, days after President Donald Trump said he’ll decide if the U.S. Military will strike Iran’s nuclear sites within a matter of two weeks. A report from Fox News on Saturday morning said six bombers took off from Whiteman Air Force Base in Missouri, and appear to be headed to Guam, per flight tracking data and voice communications with air traffic control. Based on fueling patterns, the bombers could be loaded with bunker-buster bombs, which would be critical in attacking Fordow, Iran’s nuclear site, the report noted. On Thursday, Trump relayed a message on the Middle East conflict through White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, saying that he would decide whether to strike Iran “within the next two weeks.” The following day, Iran said it has rejected “several” calls for negotiations from the United States. “Americans want to negotiate and have sent messages several times, but we clearly said that as long as this aggression doesn’t stop, there’s no place for talk of dialogue,” Iran Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi said in an address on state television, the New York Post reported. The bombers’ movement could be a tactic from the U.S. to add pressure on the Iranian regime to come to the table for negotiations. .@PressSec shares a message from President Trump: “Based on the fact that there’s a substantial chance of negotiations that may or may not take place with Iran in the near future, I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.” pic.twitter.com/r3yVnbZHAC — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) June 19, 2025 Trump has backed Israel’s airstrikes on Iran that have taken out some of the radical Islamic regime’s nuclear facilities and military leaders, while urging the Ayatollah to come to the negotiating table. The president has not ruled out direct U.S. military action against Iran, and even said that the United States knows “exactly where the so-called ‘Supreme Leader’ is hiding.” Zach Jewell contributed to this report. Related: Trump Explains What Unconditional Surrender Looks Like For Iranian Regime
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 w

Dunkin’ Customers Shocked To See A Trump Working The Drive-Thru Window
Favicon 
www.inspiremore.com

Dunkin’ Customers Shocked To See A Trump Working The Drive-Thru Window

Kai Trump, the eldest grandchild of President Donald Trump, apparently runs on Dunkin’ like the rest of America. The 18-year-old posted a series of videos on TikTok featuring her trying some of the newest coffee drinks and even working a shift in the drive-thru. Kai, who is also a pretty talented golfer, wore a pink tank top and an orange skort, a nod to the restaurant’s signature colors. As customers came to the window, Kai greeted them and served their orders. “If it’s on the Dunkin’ menu, I tried it,” she captioned the now-viral video. It’s unclear if customers knew who she was, but Kai Trump’s video caused a huge discussion on TikTok. @thekaitrumpgolfer If it’s on the Dunkin’ menu, I tried it! Full video on YouTube now #foryoupage #foodie #fyp #viral ♬ original sound – Kai Trump People Had Mixed Reactions To Kai Trump Working The Drive-Thru At Dunkin’ Most people loved seeing Kai Trump working at Dunkin’. It reminded this person of a stunt her grandfather pulled not too long ago. “Donald working at McDonald’s and now Kai working at Dunkin Donuts. Epic.” This person agreed and loved Kai Trump’s look, “That’s hilarious!! You’re even matching the logo.” “Dunkin’ addict here, I’ve tried almost everything on their menu too! Which one’s your fave,” someone asked. “This is awesome! I would not know what to say if I pulled up to you working the drive thru Kai,” another fan shared. “Love your family!” But not everyone had nice things to say. Some people have commented on Kai Trump’s video about her grandfather and the current state of affairs in our country. “YOUR GRANDFATHER PROMISED TO END 2 WARS. NOW THERE ARE 3 WARS,” a critic shared. But many quickly chimed in that Kai Trump has nothing to do with the president’s actions. “How is this her problem? If you want to complain go to someone that can actually do something about it,” someone wrote. Another person agreed, “Woah, I think you cracked it. Just harass his granddaughter and she’ll step in.” You can find this story’s featured image here. The post Dunkin’ Customers Shocked To See A Trump Working The Drive-Thru Window appeared first on InspireMore.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Caller Feed
Daily Caller Feed
1 w

BLACKMON: Trump And Wright Move To Speed Nuclear Expansion
Favicon 
dailycaller.com

BLACKMON: Trump And Wright Move To Speed Nuclear Expansion

Energy Secretary Chris Wright announced an ambitious plan to have three small modular reactors (SMRs) built and producing power at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) by July 4, 2026. This initiative was revealed during a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing on June 18, aligning with President Donald Trump’s executive orders to boost domestic […]
Like
Comment
Share
The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
1 w

Storm Rolls In, But So Does A Hero: Jersey Shore Man Rescues Woman And Dogs From Capsized Kayak
Favicon 
www.sunnyskyz.com

Storm Rolls In, But So Does A Hero: Jersey Shore Man Rescues Woman And Dogs From Capsized Kayak

Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
1 w

The ‘Regime Change’ Fallacy
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

The ‘Regime Change’ Fallacy

MAGA celebrity Charlie Kirk, attempting to balance support for the administration and appeal to online isolationists, maintains that the “regime change war machine in D.C.” is pushing President Donald Trump into “an all-out blitz on Iran.” He’s not alone. The question is, what does “regime change war” mean in simple language? Does it mean, as “non-interventionists” suggest, invading Iran and imposing American democracy on its people? Because, if so, there’s virtually no pushing for it. And I only add “virtually” in case I somehow missed a person of consequence, though it is highly unlikely. Trump, from all indications, is using the threat of the U.S. joining the war to push Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei into surrender. Though taking out Iran’s nuclear program would end the war quicker. Or does opposing “regime change” mean actively thwarting the Iranian opposition from rising fundamentalists who took power via a violent revolution in 1979? Does it mean ensuring that Khamenei survives because a resulting messy postwar fight for power is worse? It seems the latter. Kirk says, “There is a vast difference between a popular revolution and foreign-imposed, abrupt, violent regime change.” Surely, he doesn’t believe the mullahs will gradually propose liberal reforms for the people and become peaceful neighbors on their own? If Iranians revolt, it’s because of the violence imposed on the regime. The ideological overcorrection due to the failures of Iraq’s rebuild now has non-interventionists accusing anyone who proposes that it’s better if anti-American dictatorships fall of being “neocons,” perhaps the most useless phrase in our political lexicon. Forget for a moment that Iran has been an enemy of the U.S. for 45 years. Not an existential threat, no, but a deadly one, nonetheless. The non-interventionist is not bothered by the Islamic Republic’s murder of American citizens or crusade for nuclear weapons. Until Khamenei plans to drop Revolutionary Guard paratroopers into San Diego, they don’t think it’s any of our business. Because of this overcorrection, non-interventionists, both left and right, simply can’t fathom that exertion of American power could ever be a good thing. They now create revisionist histories blaming the U.S. for virtually all the world’s ills. “It was Britain, and (funded by) the United States that overthrew a democratically elected Iranian Prime Minister Mossedegh in 1953 by using hired mobs in a coup that lead (sic) to the installation of the Shah Pahlavi’s 27-year reign of authoritarianism and human rights abuses. All in the name of Iranian Oil,” wrote comedian Rob Schneider in a viral post. “Remember,” Kirk told his followers, “Iran is partially controlled by mullahs today because we designed regime change to put the Shah back in power.” Boy, I wish people would stay off Wikipedia for a while, because this fantasy, spread by blame-America leftists for decades, is now being picked up by the Right. The notion that Iran was going to be a thriving democracy in 1954 had the U.S. not gotten involved—and our involvement is way overstated—is more ridiculous than blaming us for the 1979 revolution nearly 30 years later. It is far more likely Iran would have emerged as a Soviet client state destined to fall when fundamentalists swept the Islamic world in the ’70s, anyway. Realpolitik is ugly. Non-interventionists love to harp on the deadly byproducts of our intrusions into world affairs—and there have been many—without ever grappling with the counterfactual outcome. For instance, the contention that “regime change” never works is incredibly simplistic. Regime change was a success in Germany and Japan. And I bet the Hungarians, Czechs, Slovenians, Estonians, and many others were all on board for regime change, as well. None of that happens without the U.S. intervening in conflicts, cold and hot, around the world. People will rightly point out that Europe is not the Middle East. In that regard, Iran is not Iraq or Syria. Schneider contends that “90 million people will fight for their survival again,” as they did in Iraq. Some Iranians might fight to preserve the brutal Islamic regime. Many would not. The real fear should be that a civil war would break out. There are numerous minorities in Iran, but Persian national consciousness goes back to antiquity. If the mullahs fall, a majority of Iranians may turn out to fight for a better life free of needless conflicts with the West. It may go south. It may not. I have no idea how that turns out, and neither do you. Except for one thing. Whoever wins won’t have nuclear weapons. COPYRIGHT 2025 CREATORS.COM We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post The ‘Regime Change’ Fallacy appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
1 w

Santa Ono’s DEI disaster: Florida board stands firm, refuses to rubber-stamp controversial university nomination
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Santa Ono’s DEI disaster: Florida board stands firm, refuses to rubber-stamp controversial university nomination

Earlier this month, a former DEI-loving University of Michigan president suffered national embarrassment after Florida higher-ed officials voted against his nomination to become the next president of the University of Florida. The vote shows that the academic's professed change of heart on DEI was met with significant skepticism. Earlier this month, Santa Ono — the former University of Michigan president who spent years advocating for diversity, equity, and inclusion only to distance himself from the woke philosophy in recent months — suffered national embarrassment after Florida higher-ed officials voted against his nomination to become the next president of the University of Florida. The vote shows that the academic's professed change of heart on DEI was met with significant skepticism.Ono's failed nomination and the allegations of serious academic misconduct still hovering around several former Ivy League leaders indicate that far-left causes célèbres, especially regarding DEI, seem to have fallen out of favor even at the university level.Perhaps more importantly, it seems the work of some high-profile university administrators is finally facing much-needed scrutiny.RELATED: Harvard president Claudine Gay resigns in disgrace, paints herself as a victim of 'racial animus' Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty ImagesAll the right credentials, all the right politicsSanta Ono is a familiar face in higher education. At 62 years old, Ono has served as president at some of the most prestigious universities in North America: Michigan, British Columbia, and Cincinnati. He has a PhD in experimental medicine from McGill University, is an immunologist, and once worked as an associate professor at the Harvard School of Medicine.And until recently, Ono had unapologetically embraced DEI. For instance, he stated that "systemic racism is embedded into every corner of any institution," claimed he and his family had been victims of systemic racism, and pledged to do "the work" of eradicating systemic racism from the University of Michigan through a program he called "DEI 2.0." To his credit, Ono did withstand slings and arrows from UM radicals after he axed DEI 2.0 in March, following President Donald Trump's executive order banning DEI practices. However, he admitted to nixing the program mainly on account of "federal executive orders, guidance, and funding cuts bringing urgency to the issue," not because of any personal misgivings about it.'I’m excited to be part of that.'In early May, reports began to circulate that Ono was vying for the presidential position at the University of Florida, vacated last summer by Republican former U.S. Sen. Ben Sasse of Nebraska. The news that Ono was leaving UM shocked many since he seemed deeply committed to the school. Having just joined it in 2022, Ono then signed a contract in October that extended his tenure as president there until 2032. RELATED: From Wuhan to Michigan: Feds nab ANOTHER Chinese scholar in alleged bio-material smuggling plot Photo by Michael Hickey/Getty ImagesStill, announcements about Ono's candidacy published as early as May 4 revealed he was the only person the search committee had recommended for the Florida job. The UF Board of Trustees then voted unanimously to approve him on May 27. Ono's confirmation at UF seemed all but assured. He certainly expressed confidence. In an op-ed entitled "Why I Chose the University of Florida" published by Insider Higher Ed on May 8, Ono wrote: "Florida is building something truly exceptional. I’m excited to be part of that."Then, Ono ran into Florida officials focused on removing leftist ideology from the state's university system.Anti-woke board challenges Ono on DEI recordSince his re-election in 2022, Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis has worked hard to purge wokeness from all levels of education under his purview. As governor, DeSantis is entrusted with appointing individuals who share his values to the university system board of governors to oversee the state's 12 universities, including the University of Florida.Ono seemingly understood that his previous promotion of DEI could harm his chances of landing a job in a state like Florida, which is wary of neo-Marxism, critical race theory, and DEI. So in the Inside Higher Ed op-ed, he copped to his erstwhile support for DEI, claiming he believed it was originally intended to ensure "equal opportunity and fairness for every student" but that it had unfortunately morphed into an agent of "ideology, division, and bureaucracy."'He didn't have to do that.'Ono — who four years ago penned an op-ed entitled "Universities Must Do More to Address the Climate Emergency" — further insisted he had "declined to politicize the institutions" he led and eschewed "ideological capture" at universities more generally. He then promised to uphold the "vision and values for public higher education" as expressed by Floridian leaders, ostensibly including DeSantis."If I am approved, UF will remain a campus where all students are safe, where differing views can be heard, and where the rule of law is respected," Ono pledged (emphasis added).Gov. DeSantis, who said he found many of Ono's statements "cringe"-worthy but otherwise more or less stayed out of the nomination, deferred to those directly involved in the vetting process to determine whether Ono's change of heart on DEI was sincere. "It’s their judgment that he’s really kind of reached the limit on the campus leftism," DeSantis told reporters, "and he would want to leave Michigan, where that is prevalent, to Florida, where it’s frowned upon, because he wants to be more in line with what Florida is doing and our policies."RELATED: DEI-vestment: University of Florida sheds ‘inclusion’ for innovation Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis looks on during warm-ups prior to the Capital One Orange Bowl between the Florida Gators and the Virginia Cavaliers at Hard Rock Stadium on December 30, 2019, in Miami, Florida. (Photo by Mark Brown/Getty Images)Ono continued to distance himself from his DEI-filled past during an interview with the University of Florida Board of Trustees on May 27, claiming that his opinions on systemic racism "evolved over time" and that no group or institution should ever be tarred with a "blanket definition or label."The board of trustees was apparently so eager to make Ono the next UF president that they accepted Ono's explanations regarding his DEI "volte-face" with little skepticism, according to an op-ed from Scott Yenor and Steven DeRose. Yenor and DeRose characterized the BOT as "embarrassing" automatons who simply "nodded" along as Ono attempted to explain away his past.Yenor and DeRose likewise described Ono as a "dishonorable man," a "fanatical opportunist," and an empty suit.Yenor and DeRose were not the only ones alarmed by Ono's nomination. Florida Republicans in Congress — Sen. Rick Scott and Reps. Byron Donalds, Jimmy Patronis, and Greg Steube — all voiced their opposition to Ono, as did Donald Trump Jr., Charlie Kirk, and some members of the public.The Florida board of governors apparently heeded those concerns. Paul Renner, a former speaker of the Florida House and a member of the BOG, told Blaze News that he was greatly "troubled" by the disconnect between Ono's "horrendous record on DEI" and his statements to the UF trustees."If you give an interview and everything you've said is directly contradicted by the public record, that's a problem, a problem of candor," Renner said.Yenor, a political science professor at Boise State University and the senior director of state coalitions at the Claremont Institute’s Center for the American Way of Life, gave Blaze News a similar assessment of Ono."He changed his view on a whole host of issues at a convenient time in order to get a job," Yenor explained. "That shows that his convictions are for sale."Because of Ono's seemingly shallow convictions, DeRose likened him to a "political windsock," borrowing the imagery from another source. Ono did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News. Renner and his fellow members of the board of governors used their interview with Ono in the first week of June to challenge him on his DEI record as well as other issues.Governor Carson Good, for example, pressed Ono on his decision to require UM students to receive COVID boosters as late as 2023. Despite his background in immunology and experimental medicine, Ono claimed he had simply followed the recommendation of UM health officials, stammering that he is "basically a mouse doctor.""I don't think he's a strong leader," Renner reiterated to Blaze News, characterizing Ono instead as "opportunistic.""He's not in the camp of somebody who felt like they had to [promote DEI] to keep their job," Renner continued. "He did it with his own face in a lot of these videos. He cut professional productions that talked about two spirits and transgenderism and thinking beyond the binary.""He didn't have to do that."Yenor seems to agree, telling Blaze News that Ono is "not someone who's taken any lumps for changing his views" on DEI.In response to a request for comment, a DeSantis administration official gave Blaze News the following statement: "The governor appointed people to the Florida Board of Governors who are conservative and aligned to use their judgment, and he had confidence in their ability to be able to discharge this responsibility."'A very, very, very easy decision'Ultimately, only six members of the board of governors voted in favor of Ono's nomination. Meanwhile, Renner, Good, and eight other governors voted against it. That 10-6 vote marked the first time in the BOG's 22-year history that members had rejected a candidate for university president. It may even have been the first vote of its kind in American history.Most liberals and their allies in the media bewailed the politics involved in the BOG's decision.'Many of the repudiations that Dr. Ono took were only taken after it was clear he was being seriously considered for the University of Florida job.'The Gainesville Sun brooded that Ono was "grilled" over so many "flashpoints in the culture wars" — DEI, so-called climate change, and gender-related interventions for minors — that have been "waged by Florida's ruling conservatives.""It’s an absolute embarrassment. The political questions that were being asked portends more politics in the process and less focus on academics," howled Amanda Phalin, a former BOG member and a current business professor at UF, according to the Miami Herald, which also claimed Ono had been "clearly caught off-guard" by the BOG's questions."Because of your insistence on performative politics, you chose to question him repeatedly on hot button political issues and then refused to accept his thoughtful answers," fumed another UF professor, Dr. Michael Haller, who self-identifies as an "ally" of non-heterosexual people, according his X bio."No qualified apolitical leader will ever come near our campus again with an eye on sitting in a leadership role."RELATED: Pro-Palestinian students at University of Michigan force their way into 'locked' admin building, several arrested: Report Podcast host Dan Senor moderates a session with WashU Chancellor Andrew D. Martin and University of Michigan President Santa Ono at the ADL Never Is Now event at Javits Center on March 3, 2025, in New York City. (Photo by Bryan Bedder/Getty Images for Anti-Defamation League)However, Zack Smith of the Heritage Foundation — who, as a trustee of the University of West Florida and Pensacola State College, knows something of the nomination process — denied that Ono was ambushed by the BOG."The concern many people had [was] it didn't seem so much as a 'road to Damascus'-type conversion as it did a conversion of convenience, where many of the actions, many of the repudiations that Dr. Ono took were only taken after it was clear he was being seriously considered for the University of Florida job," Smith explained to Blaze News.When asked whether members of the BOG faced undue pressure from high-profile Florida conservatives to block Ono's nomination, both Smith and Renner disputed that such pressure would have influenced the governors' vote one way or the other."If you look at the members of the board of governors," Smith said, "they are not wilting wallflowers themselves. Many have experience in state government and a host of different industries as well, and so I doubt that they were pressured by anyone."Governor Renner confirmed that "there was a crucible" but added that the heat comes with the BOG territory: "If you don't like pressure on an issue like this, don't sign up for the job." "For me, this was a very, very, very easy decision."'Unprecedented'Because the BOG vote to block Ono's nomination was so "unprecedented," it likewise revealed another problem with the higher-education system: The process to select a university president has seemingly been little more than political theater.A school typically hires a search firm that then crafts a carefully worded job description that, according to Yenor, will attract a particular candidate or a particular type of candidate — likely one who shares their values. The University of Florida, for instance, may have signaled a preference for DEI-supporting prospects like Ono by hiring SP&A, which describes itself as "a boutique woman- and minority-owned executive search firm."In Florida, once a board of trustees votes on a candidate, he or she is then passed along to the state board of governors, who until Ono have apparently rubber-stamped every nominee they've been asked to consider. 'Thank you so much for saving the University of Florida.'Several sources indicated to Blaze News that the BOG was right to be concerned about Ono and to treat his hearing not as a pro forma exercise with the result already predetermined but as an opportunity to vet his true personal and professional character."I think the board acted appropriately to ask some very hard, very serious questions of Dr. Ono," Smith said. "Their final sign-off approval was placed there for a reason."Yenor claimed that the Ono case may yet show that "the era where people defer to the experts is over."The UF Board of Trustees, especially Chair Mori Hosseini, which had just voted unanimously in support of Ono, blasted the BOG for rejecting his nomination. Hosseini — who has donated generously to Florida Republicans in the past, including more than $1 million to DeSantis' failed presidential bid — called the decision "deeply disappointing.""You all decided today is the day you’re going to take somebody down," Hosseini told the BOG directly.RELATED: Florida first lady gives hint on possible run for governor Florida Gators national championship men's basketball team meets with President Trump at the White House. Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty ImagesBy contrast, Renner told Blaze News that while he did receive multiple complaints from UF associates about his vote against Ono, some UF faculty members secretly expressed their appreciation for stymieing the Ono nomination. "Thank you so much for saving the University of Florida," he recalled them saying.For his part, Ono remains loyal to the University of Michigan, the school he ditched in favor of the University of Florida. Though he acknowledged in his resignation message some disagreement with the UM Board of Regents, as of Wednesday afternoon, Ono's X profile still has the hashtag "Go Blue!" In fact, there's even an outside chance that he could stay at the school as a member of the faculty.The University of Michigan did not respond to a request for comment from Blaze News.The sources who spoke with Blaze News did not share any insights as to who may be on the radar screen for the UF presidential vacancy, but most are optimistic that the right candidate is out there. Renner indicated that he or she may be found within traditional academic circles. "There's good people out there," he explained. "I hope they do the right thing the next time around. But if it's the same thing, guess what? It's going to be the same answer. So I hope a message has been sent to pick somebody who is an actual leader on this issue and has all the academic credentials they want."DeRose and Smith, by contrast, believe that the school should consider candidates outside of academia. DeRose claimed UF must look for a leader from another industry to demonstrate a true commitment to "education reform.""Florida doesn't need a president who's just now evolving on DEI. They need the anti-DEI 2.0 president," he explained. "You're not going to find that from people who have traditional backgrounds in academia.""There certainly are other good candidates out there," Smith claimed, "if they kind of widen their search net."Editor's note: Matthew Peterson, the editor in chief of Blaze News, is a Washington fellow for the Claremont Institute.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
1 w

Global elites think you’re too stupid for soda and beer
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Global elites think you’re too stupid for soda and beer

The latest wheeze from global public health elites? Jack up taxes on tobacco, alcohol, sugary drinks, and processed food by 50% to raise $3.7 trillion in new revenue. They call it “health policy.” In plain English, it’s government-sanctioned theft.This isn’t about curing disease. It’s about expanding state power. These so-called health taxes, pushed by academic ideologues and international bureaucrats, are little more than economic punishment disguised as progress. They won’t meaningfully reduce illness, but they’ll absolutely hit working people the hardest.Sin taxes don’t foster well-being — they weaponize economic pain against the people who can least afford it.The new push for massive taxes on soda, smokes, beer, and snacks is social engineering with a hefty price tag. The goal isn’t better health so much as behavioral compliance. And who pays for it? Not corporations. Not policymakers. Regular people. Especially those already stretched thin.The promise of $3.7 trillion in new revenue tells you everything you need to know. This is about cash, not caring. You’re not going to fix the obesity crisis by making a Coke cost $4. You’re just making life worse for the guy who wants a cold drink after work.These aren’t just products. They’re small pleasures — a beer at dinner, a smoke on break, a soda on a hot afternoon. Legal, affordable, familiar. Stripping them from people’s lives in the name of “health” doesn’t uplift anyone. It makes life more miserable.And this plan doesn’t educate or empower. It punishes. It uses taxes to bludgeon people into compliance. That’s not public health — that’s moral authoritarianism.Proponents claim that higher prices discourage consumption, especially among young people. But that’s not smart policy — it’s an admission that the entire strategy relies on pricing people out of their own choices.That’s not a sign of sound policy; it’s a confession that the aim is to price people out of their own choices. It’s hard not to see this as profoundly elitist. A worldview in which an ignorant public must be nudged, coerced, and taxed into making decisions deemed acceptable by a distant class of arrogant policymakers. Sin taxes don’t foster well-being — they weaponize economic pain against the people who can least afford it. The more someone spends on a drink or a cigarette, the less they can spend on rent, groceries, or gas. In the U.K., economists found that sin taxes cost low-income families up to 10 times more than they cost the wealthy. That holds true in the United States as well. These are regressive by design.History offers a warning. Prohibition didn’t end drinking — it empowered criminals. Today, in places like Australia, black markets for vapes and other restricted products are booming. When governments overregulate, people continue to consume. They just go underground, and quality, safety, and accountability go with them.Public health bureaucrats love to talk about the “commercial determinants of health,” blaming industry for every social ill. But they ignore the personal determinants that matter even more: freedom, dignity, and the right to make informed decisions.RELATED: Cigarettes and beer: The heady perfume that transports me to my childhood guruXOOX via iStock/Getty Images People already know the risks of smoking, drinking, and sugar consumption. They’ve seen the labels and heard the warnings for years. They don’t need lectures from bureaucrats, government ministers, or international agencies. What they need is respect — and the freedom to live as they choose.These new tax schemes don’t offer support or alternatives. They rely on coercion, not persuasion. The state becomes the enforcer, not the helper. It’s a government model that punishes pleasure and equates restriction with virtue.The sinister core of this health tax agenda lies in its relentless condescension. It assumes people are too stupid, too reckless, or too addicted to choose what’s best for themselves, and so government must intervene forcefully and repeatedly. This is control, not compassionate governance.A better path exists — one rooted in harm reduction, not prohibition. Encourage low-sugar drink options. Expand access to safer nicotine alternatives. Support moderate alcohol consumption. Respect the people you’re trying to help.If public health advocates truly want to improve outcomes, they should abandon these regressive, punitive proposals. They should promote innovation, not punishment. Education, not enforcement.Because real public health doesn’t treat people like problems to be managed. It treats them like citizens — free to live, choose, and thrive.
Like
Comment
Share
Gamers Realm
Gamers Realm
1 w

Balatro 1.1 will be even better as developer Localthunk celebrates big milestone
Favicon 
www.pcgamesn.com

Balatro 1.1 will be even better as developer Localthunk celebrates big milestone

Balatro developer ‘Localthunk’ is celebrating today, having finally overcome their own hardest in-game challenge. The indie deckbuilder exploded in popularity with its launch in 2024, and it’s due to receive a major gameplay update in 2025. Now, after much agony, the roguelike’s creator confirms that they’ve finally 100% completed Balatro, and that the strive to do so has put them in a better position to deliver the much-anticipated 1.1 update. Continue reading Balatro 1.1 will be even better as developer Localthunk celebrates big milestone MORE FROM PCGAMESN: Best roguelike games, Best card games, Best new PC games
Like
Comment
Share
NEWSMAX Feed
NEWSMAX Feed
1 w

Israeli Military Says it Killed Two Iranian Commanders
Favicon 
www.newsmax.com

Israeli Military Says it Killed Two Iranian Commanders

Israel's Defense Minister Israel Katz said on Saturday that the military had killed a veteran commander in the Iranian Revolutionary Guards' overseas arm, in a strike in an apartment in Iran's Qom province.
Like
Comment
Share
NEWSMAX Feed
NEWSMAX Feed
1 w

Toyota to Raise US Auto Prices by Average $270 from July
Favicon 
www.newsmax.com

Toyota to Raise US Auto Prices by Average $270 from July

Japanese carmaker Toyota Motor said on Saturday it will raise prices for some vehicles sold in the United States by an average of $270 starting in July.The automaker's decision follows U.S. President Donald Trump's imposition of a 25% tariff on imported vehicles and auto...
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 1429 out of 83996
  • 1425
  • 1426
  • 1427
  • 1428
  • 1429
  • 1430
  • 1431
  • 1432
  • 1433
  • 1434
  • 1435
  • 1436
  • 1437
  • 1438
  • 1439
  • 1440
  • 1441
  • 1442
  • 1443
  • 1444
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund