Last week, the Trump White House hosted PragerU CEO Marissa Streit to launch a patriotic exhibit called “The Founders Museum,” a joint effort involving the White House, PragerU, and the Department of Education. That seems a rather odd thing for an “antigovernment extremist group” to do, yet that’s exactly the label the Southern Poverty Law Center applies to PragerU. According to the SPLC, this nonprofit best known for its five-minute educational videos secretly works to “protect white supremacy” and belongs on a “hate map” with chapters of America’s most notorious hate group, the Ku Klux Klan. The SPLC’s ire against PragerU comes as no surprise. After all, the SPLC has a long track record of putting mainstream conservative and Christian nonprofits on its “hate map,” and PragerU’s videos spread far and wide, encouraging Americans to defend family values, free markets, systems based on merit rather than identity—in short, the virtues of America. This patriotism explains why PragerU is celebrating America’s 250th anniversary at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, so why does the SPLC hate it so much? SPLC’s Beef With PragerU As I wrote in my book, “Making Hate Pay: The Corruption of the Southern Poverty Law Center,” the SPLC gained its reputation by suing Klan groups into bankruptcy. Now, it uses a “hate map” to suggest that mainstream conservative nonprofits are somehow akin to the KKK. This map inspired a terrorist attack in 2012. We're going through something similar to the Protestant Reformation and the Wars of Religion afterward, I tell @prageru's @marissastreit.The Left's NGOs are rebranding the woke revolution, and the SPLC is trying to prevent anyone from stopping it.https://t.co/u7MRZJohrv https://t.co/hPIUANVxnl pic.twitter.com/zarjPlm8B2— Tyler O'Neil (@Tyler2ONeil) June 17, 2025 Back in 2018, the SPLC insinuated that PragerU has connections to the alt-right movement, even while admitting that PragerU published a video condemning the alt-right. Dennis Prager—who has been recovering in the hospital as the SPLC attacks him—eviscerated this disgusting attack at the time. When the SPLC added PragerU to the “hate map” in May, it also published its “Year in Hate and Extremism” report, which mentions PragerU in two sections—the “anti-student inclusion movement” and the opposition to the Left’s diversity, equity, and inclusion agenda. “In 2024, [DEI] initiatives became ground zero for hard-right mobilizations to whitewash American society and protect white supremacy,” wrote SPLC research analysts Maya Henson Carey and R.G. Cravens. Carey and Cravens frame DEI as “essential in ensuring pluralism … and promoting democracy.” Such programs “promote teaching accurate histories of American inequalities as structural.” This sentence smuggles in the notion of critical race theory, which teaches that American society is fundamentally unjust and oppressive against certain races, classes, LGBTQ identities, and more. Critical race theory inspired The New York Times’ 1619 Project, which attempted to redefine America’s Founding—placing the real beginning of America with the arrival of the first slaves, rather than the signing of the Declaration of Independence. PragerU naturally disagrees with this. Yes, America has struggled to live up to the ideals of the declaration, but critical race theory effectively denies the real progress of abolishing slavery and defending civil rights. It also encourages Americans to judge each other by the color of their skin, not the content of their character. “The antigovernment group PragerU calls DEI ‘an affront to America’s core values’ that must be ‘cast … into the dustbin of history alongside all the other racist and discredited ideas of the past,'” the SPLC noted. Right-thinking Americans agree with PragerU on this score. Fighting the Left’s Takeover of Education The SPLC also attacked PragerU as part of an “anti-student inclusion movement” including Moms for Liberty (which has been on the “hate map” since 2023). The SPLC uses this framing to suggest that the parental rights movement is the aggressor in the cultural battles over education, while conveniently ignoring the Left’s ideological seizure of the classroom. In fact, the SPLC runs its own program—long called “Teaching Tolerance” but now rebranded as “Learning for Justice”—pushing critical race theory, transgender identity, and other leftist social causes in schools. The retreat away from tolerance is instructive. When the parental rights movement calls for putting an end to classes teaching that blacks are inherently oppressed and whites inherently oppressors, for removing pornographic books from school libraries, and for parental opt-outs to LGBTQ lessons, the SPLC says that amounts to “promoting far-right ideological narratives.” The SPLC claimed that PragerU is a “significant actor in this disinformation ecosystem,” and that it “specializes in promoting far-right propaganda through professionally produced media.” “Critics have accused PragerU materials of promoting nationalism, anti-DEI narratives and the whitewashing of historical events as patriotic education,” the SPLC noted. “These narratives play into broader moral panic campaigns that portray public schools as battlegrounds for the nation’s cultural future.” So, SPLC’s attack on PragerU boils down to two things: PragerU fights the SPLC’s woke agenda in schools, and PragerU loves America too much. By claiming that PragerU’s great sin is being insufficiently negative about America’s history and telling kids about the virtues of our Founding, the SPLC effectively admits there’s really nothing to justify PragerU’s presence on the “hate map.” Americans should be grateful that PragerU, not the SPLC, is advising the White House’s celebration of America’s 250th anniversary. The post Why Is PragerU on a ‘Hate Map’? Because It Loves America’s Founding Too Much appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Among U.S. allies in Europe, Poland has been the strongest advocate for expanding European defense forces since the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine. Continuing to take this mission seriously, Poland has turned to South Korea as a defense partner, particularly in the acquisition of K2 tanks.  Such collaboration serves as an example for other U.S. allies while also pointing to the necessary expansion of European defense.  Polish forces utilized Soviet-era battle tanks before investing in K2s. New efforts in modernization include plans to replace any outdated tanks, infantry fighting vehicles and artillery systems.  In August 2022, Poland signed a defense agreement with Hyundai Rotem in South Korea. The agreement included a contract for $3.4 billion worth of K2 tanks—180 units—to be sent to Poland before 2026.  By the end of 2024, Poland had already received 84 of the K2 tanks. Yet, the acquisition benefits of this relationship have only just begun. In addition to waiting for complete fulfillment of the first order, Poland is pursuing another deal with South Korea to acquire 820 additional tanks.  This purchase aligns with Poland’s 2025 security strategy which supports defense spending through streamlining investment into the defense industry and initiating a framework for Europe to take responsibility of their own security.  In addition, the purchase is consistent with Poland’s defense modernization program which intends to enhance land capabilities through new armored vehicles, artillery, and air defense.  The Polish Deputy Prime Minister W. Kosiniak-Kamysz recently stated to the Foreign Affairs Council, “We spend more not to participate in wars, but so that there are no wars in the first place.”  Nevertheless, Poland faces challenges related to the speed of procuring new systems and integrating them into their force structure.   But the key to accomplishing modernization goals lies in defense purchases from qualified countries like South Korea.  In fact, the U.S. International Trade Administration stated that, “As of 2023, South Korea has the world’s 9th largest defense budget and is the world’s 8th largest defense exporter.” The former South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol declared intentions to bring South Korea into the rankings of highest four weapons suppliers in the world.  Such defense prioritization and a prosperous defense industrial base have placed South Korea as a leading security partner to the U.S. and its allies.  The accelerated timeline of Poland’s defense modernization necessitated outsourcing as domestic production could not have kept pace alone. Purchases from South Korea can and already have provided new systems with updated technology while on an efficient timeline.  The K2 Black Panther is a modern tank with advanced autoloaders, active protection systems, composite armor, and fire control. Additionally, the K2 has a 1,500-horsepower engine and advanced suspension which together offer benefits in maneuverability. Finally, the K2 is compatible with other NATO systems.   Yet, the cooperation between Poland and South Korea does not end with K2s. Poland has also signed contracts to purchase K9?155mm tracked self-propelled howitzers, HOMAR-K?and Chunmoo Multiple Launch Rocket Systems, and light fighter aircraft.  South Korea has even agreed for Poland to produce a variation of the K2 domestically. This system, the K2PL, will begin production in 2026.  What’s more, these weapons deals have created a cooperative framework from which training collaboration has emerged. In May 2025, 16 Polish soldiers spent two weeks training with the Chunmoo rocket artillery in Paju, South Korea.   Following presidential elections in June 2025, there will be a new administration in Poland. However, Poland’s modernization program was a bipartisan development which is unlikely to see great change.  At the upcoming NATO summit in The Hague, there is no doubt that Poland will be one of the strongest advocates for increased defense spending.   In determining where to allocate this defense spending, other European allies should consider following Poland’s example and purchasing defense systems from qualified and friendly countries abroad.  Overall, the partnership between Poland and South Korea illustrates the mutually beneficial nature of defense cooperation. And the rest of Europe would do well to learn from Poland’s example.  The post Poland’s Purchases From South Korea Set Example appeared first on The Daily Signal.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. A legal challenge targeting Apple’s iCloud practices is moving forward after a federal judge reversed an earlier decision to dismiss the case. The lawsuit, which centers on allegations of antitrust violations, has been revived following a revised complaint that brings new evidence to the table. We obtained a copy of the ruling for you here. The case, first brought in March 2024, accuses Apple of leveraging its control over iCloud to maintain a monopoly, a move that plaintiffs argue breaches the Sherman and Clayton Acts. They claim users of Apple devices are locked into using iCloud for certain backup functions, thereby limiting meaningful competition in the cloud storage market. Judge Eumi Lee of the US District Court in San Jose initially threw out the lawsuit in March 2025. However, she allowed plaintiffs to refile, and now says their amended filing includes “substantial new allegations.” The updated complaint specifically highlights restrictions on data types like device settings, which can only be backed up through iCloud, something Apple’s earlier defense did not directly address. Apple previously contended that users are not forced to use its service, pointing to the availability of other storage options. But the new filing argues otherwise, stating that users are effectively steered toward iCloud and away from alternatives, which plaintiffs argue are often superior. Timing also became a point of legal debate. Apple’s attorneys had maintained the case was filed too late under antitrust statutes that impose a four-year limit. Judge Lee disagreed, noting the lead plaintiff initiated the suit within four years of their first iCloud use. Still, she noted that the timing question remains unresolved and may need further examination “because it is unclear when Plaintiffs’ claims accrued and whether Apple engaged in a continuing antitrust violation.” The complaint also disputes Apple’s framing of user freedom, asserting that consumers rarely choose competitors, not because of preference, but due to Apple’s ecosystem design. Plaintiffs claim this strategy amounts to coercion. Apple has yet to comment on the latest developments. The court has given the company until July 7, 2025, to submit its official response. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post The Cloud Cage: Apple’s iCloud Monopoly Back in Court appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

Iran Rejects Negotiations Unless Israel Ceases Fire

Anticipation - It's Not Just A Song About Ketchup

Their scales, which are made of the same protein in human hair, are falsely believed to have medicinal properties.

The center takes tiny particles captured by washing machine filters and converts them into recyclable materials.

What was once confined to fringe theories and late-night talk shows is now a subject of serious discussion within government halls and scientific institutions. With declassified reports, military encounters, and official acknowledgements, understanding UAP topic requires more than casual speculation. For those seeking to navigate this strange landscape, documentaries offer a powerful lens. They compile eyewitness testimony, expert analysis, and declassified materials, presenting a range of perspectives on what these mysterious objects might be. This curated list focuses on films that have significantly contributed to the public discourse, offering rigorous investigations. Here are seven UFO/UAP documentaries that offer distinct insights into the subject. 1. The Phenomenon (2020) Director: James Fox The Phenomenon stands as a benchmark in UAP documentaries, largely due to its focus on credible witnesses and official acknowledgements. Director James Fox, a long-time investigator in the field, compiles accounts from former high-ranking government officials, military personnel, and intelligence community members. The film gains significant traction from its interviews with individuals like Harry Reid, former Senate Majority Leader, and Christopher Mellon, former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Intelligence. The documentary provides a historical overview of UAP sightings, from the well-known incidents like the Phoenix Lights to less publicized but equally compelling cases. What sets The Phenomenon apart is its emphasis on the institutional shift in how UAPs are perceived, highlighting the Pentagon’s official release of UAP videos in 2017. The film posits that something genuinely unexplained is occurring in our airspace and calls for a more serious scientific and governmental inquiry into the matter. Its strength lies in presenting a cohesive narrative supported by high-level sources, moving the discussion firmly into the realm of legitimate inquiry. 2. Bob Lazar: Area 51 & Flying Saucers (2018) Director: Jeremy Corbell Bob Lazar’s claims first surfaced in 1989, when he asserted he worked on reverse-engineering extraterrestrial technology at a secret site known as S-4, near Area 51. Bob Lazar: Area 51 & Flying Saucers revisits his controversial story, providing Lazar a platform to reiterate his experiences and offer new details. Directed by Jeremy Corbell, the film presents Lazar’s narrative with an engaging, albeit speculative, approach. Lazar’s testimony includes descriptions of alien propulsion systems, elemental physics beyond current scientific understanding, and a clandestine government program to study recovered craft. While his story remains hotly debated and lacks traditional corroboration, Corbell’s documentary focuses on Lazar’s consistency, the enduring impact of his claims on popular culture, and the persistent questions surrounding Area 51. The film does not shy away from the skepticism surrounding Lazar but instead presents his story as a significant, enduring thread in the fabric of UAP discourse. 3. Moment of Contact (2022) Director: James Fox Another compelling offering from James Fox, Moment of Contact delves into the infamous Varginha UFO incident, which allegedly occurred in Varginha, Brazil, in 1996. The documentary investigates claims of a UAP crash and the subsequent recovery of alleged non-human biological entities by Brazilian military forces. Fox travels to Brazil, interviewing key witnesses, military personnel, and local residents who claim to have seen or been involved in the events. The film meticulously pieces together the various accounts, highlighting inconsistencies and points of corroboration. It explores the societal impact of such an event on a small community and the challenges faced by those who step forward with extraordinary claims. 4. Unacknowledged (2017) Director: Michael Mazzola Unacknowledged centers on the work of Dr. Steven Greer, founder of the Disclosure Project, who asserts that the U.S. government has suppressed evidence of extraterrestrial contact and advanced energy technologies for decades. The documentary presents a vast array of alleged whistleblower testimonies, classified documents, and UAP footage, much of which Greer claims has never been publicly released before. Greer’s argument is that a clandestine group within the government has maintained a cover-up to protect vested interests in the energy sector and to control information about advanced propulsion systems. The film features interviews with former military and intelligence officials who claim to have firsthand knowledge of UAP incidents and government secrecy. Unacknowledged is a polemical yet influential film, representing a particular viewpoint within the disclosure movement that advocates for a full revelation of UAP information to the public. 5. Mirage Men (2013) Director: John Lundberg, Roland Denning, Mark Pilkington Mirage Men offers a distinct perspective, exploring the theory that some UAP sightings and conspiracy narratives were intentionally fabricated or manipulated by intelligence agencies as a form of psychological warfare or to obscure legitimate classified projects. Based on the book by Mark Pilkington, the documentary interviews former intelligence officers and individuals involved in creating UFO hoaxes. The film suggests that the U.S. Air Force and intelligence services strategically exploited public interest in UFOs to create confusion and discredit genuine investigations. By blurring the lines between fact and fiction, these agencies allegedly aimed to control public perception and divert attention from their own secret aerospace programs. 6. Ariel Phenomenon (2022) Director: Randall Nickerson This documentary meticulously re-examines the Ariel School incident, a remarkable event that took place in Ruwa, Zimbabwe, in 1994. Over 60 schoolchildren reported seeing a large craft land in a field near their school and described interacting with beings who emerged from it. The children’s consistent and detailed accounts, despite their young age, have made this case a compelling study for UAP researchers. Ariel Phenomenon features extensive interviews with the now-adult witnesses, who recount their experiences with striking clarity and emotional depth years later. The film also includes archival footage from the time of the incident, including interviews with Harvard psychiatrist Dr. John E. Mack, who extensively investigated the children’s testimonies. The documentary explores the profound psychological impact of such an event on the children and the challenges of being believed when reporting extraordinary experiences. 7. Unidentified: Inside America’s UFO Investigation (2019) Producers: Tom DeLonge, Leslie Kean, George Knapp, Ben Smith This docuseries follows former intelligence officer Luis Elizondo and other key figures as they work to bring the UAP phenomenon into mainstream public and governmental awareness. Elizondo famously resigned from his position at the Pentagon to protest the secrecy surrounding the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program (AATIP), a covert UAP investigation program. The series chronicles the efforts of Elizondo and his colleagues to push for transparency and serious examination of UAPs by the U.S. government. It features interviews with former military pilots who describe their firsthand encounters with UAPs, along with discussions of the implications for national security. Unidentified played a significant role in elevating the UAP discussion within political circles, demonstrating how official channels and individuals are now actively engaging with the subject. The series highlights the shift from a stigmatized topic to one demanding formal investigation and reporting. 8. UFO Encounters of the Fifth Kind (2023) Director: Mark Christopher Lee Mark Christopher Lee’s UFO Encounters of the Fifth Kind delves into the concept of CE5 (Close Encounters of the Fifth Kind) protocols, which propose that humans can initiate contact with UAPs and extraterrestrial beings through conscious intent and specific meditation techniques. The documentary features UFO enthusiasts and practitioners attempting to demonstrate these protocols in real-time, often capturing anomalous phenomena on camera. The film examines the theories put forth by researchers like Dr. Steven Greer, exploring the idea that UAPs are not merely observed but can be actively summoned. Lee’s approach includes interviews with individuals who claim to have achieved successful CE5 interactions, offering their personal accounts and insights. This documentary provides a unique perspective on the UAP phenomenon, shifting the focus from passive observation to active participation and exploring the potential for human-initiated contact. It’s a journey into a more esoteric aspect of UAP research. The post 8 UFO/UAP Documentaries That Demand Your Attention appeared first on Anomalien.com.

POLL: What was the worst media take of the week? (Vote below)     NOMINEES:    1. Jim Acosta Bashes Trump’s “Kim Jong-Un Birthday Parade”  “The President of the United States is a danger to this country. Full stop….Even people in the Republican party were afraid to show up at his birthday parade, the dictator Kim Jong-Un birthday parade that he tried to have….One of the images I took away from the weekend that really stayed with me were those military veterans....who had fought in World War II and said, ‘we defeated fascism the last time. I’m here to do it this time.’”— Former CNN anchor Jim Acosta at Center for American Progress, June 17.   2. Whoopi Goldberg: It’s Worse to Be Black in America Than Live in Iran Co-host Alyssa Farah Griffin: “I think it’s very different to live in the United States in 2025 than it is in Iran.”Co-host Whoopi Goldberg: “Not if you’re black!”— ABC’s The View, June 18.    3. Eugene Robinson: “No Mandate” For Trump’s “Proto-Fascism” “You had 5 million people in demonstrations around the country against what President Trump is doing. What it brought to mind to me was a number that….Joe Scarborough mentioned earlier, 1.5 percent. That was the margin between the 77 million votes that Donald Trump got and the 75 million that Kamala Harris got. And it’s not this overwhelming mandate for proto-fascism.”— MSNBC analyst Eugene Robinson on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, June 17.    Loading…   Funded by James P. Jimirro

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit overruled a Clinton judge and delivered some bad news to California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) that might wipe the default grin off his face.How it startedExercising his constitutional and statutory powers, President Donald Trump deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles on June 7, noting that the anti-Immigration and Customs Enforcement riots constituted "a form of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States."'It is likely that the president lawfully exercised his statutory authority under § 12406(3).'Newsom — among the many Democrats who downplayed the violence and appeared sympathetic to the rioters' cause — asked a federal district court judge to force Trump to surrender control of the federalized California National Guard.U.S. District Court Judge Charles Breyer, a Bill Clinton appointee, sided with Newsom, claiming on June 12 that Trump's actions "were illegal — both exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment of the United States Constitution."Newsom subsequently told Trump, "You must relinquish your authority of the National Guard back to me and back to California," then smugly attacked the president in a press conference where he called Trump "weak."The governor's gloating was cut short when the Trump administration appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals and secured an emergency ruling to return command of the National Guard to the president.How it's goingNewsom optimistically stated on Tuesday, days ahead of the appellate court's ruling, "I'm confident in the rule of law. I'm confident in the Constitution of the United States. I'm confident in the reasoned decision issued last week by a very well-respected federal judge. And I'm confident that common sense will prevail here."Common sense prevailed — just not in Newsom's favor.RELATED: Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass to California: 'Look what you made us do!' Mario Tama/Los Angeles Times/Getty ImagesOn Thursday, a three-judge panel of the appeals court ruled unanimously in the president's favor, granting a stay of the Clinton judge's order.The appeals court concluded that "it is likely that the president lawfully exercised his statutory authority under § 12406(3), which authorizes federalization of the National Guard when 'the president is unable with the regular forces to execute the laws of the United States'" and indicated Hegseth's transmittal of the order "likely satisfied the statute's procedural requirement that federalization orders be issued 'through' the governor."'The Judges obviously realized that Gavin Newscum is incompetent and ill prepared.'The court also recognized that Trump had "a colorable basis" for deploying the National Guard, citing evidence that the anti-ICE rioters:interfered "with the ability of federal officers to execute the laws"; threw objects at ICE vehicles attempting to complete a law enforcement operation; threw Molotov cocktails and vandalized property;"'pinned down' several [Federal Protective Service] officers defending federal property by throwing 'concrete chunks, bottles of liquid, and other objects,' and used 'large rolling commercial dumpsters as a battering ram' in an attempt to breach the parking garage of a federal building."To Newsom's likely chagrin, the court noted further that "the president's failure to issue the federalization order directly 'through' the governor of California does not limit his otherwise lawful authority to call up the National Guard" and that "Newsom had no power to veto or countermand the president's order."Newsom, like Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and other Democrats, suggested that the presence of the National Guard was inflammatory and prompted more unrest.RELATED: The Democrats’ key to success California National Guard troops outside a Los Angeles federal building on June 9, 2025. Photo by David McNew/Getty ImagesThe appellate court was not buying what the governor was selling, noting both that "these concerns are counterbalanced by the undisputed fact that federal property has been damaged and federal employees have been injured" and that such concerns "are too speculative."President Trump celebrated the ruling, suggesting the decision affirms his ability to take similar action elsewhere if necessary."BIG WIN in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals on the President's core power to call in the National Guard!" the president wrote on Truth Social. "The Judges obviously realized that Gavin Newscum is incompetent and ill prepared, but this is much bigger than Gavin, because all over the United States, if our Cities, and our people, need protection, we are the ones to give it to them should State and Local Police be unable, for whatever reason, to get the job done.""This is a Great Decision for our Country, and we will continue to protect and defend Law abiding Americans. Congratulations to the Ninth Circuit, America is proud of you tonight!" added Trump.Newsom expressed his disappointment, vowing to press forward with his "challenge to President Trump's authoritarian use of U.S. military soldiers against citizens."Judge Breyer is reportedly contemplating whether to slap Trump with another injunction, restricting the president's use of National Guard troops in Los Angeles.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!