A new wave of censorship and mass propaganda is coming. The post UN Turns COVID Censorship to Climate Censorship appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

A president who served a century ago showed what was wrong with socialist policies. The post The Anti-Mamdani appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

The tolerant Left can't tolerate loved ones with differing opinions. The post Kimmel’s Wife Shuns Trump-Voting Family appeared first on Frontpage Mag.

The Supreme Court on Monday said it will decide whether federal law prohibits states from counting mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day. The legal battle before the court involves Mississippi’s procedures for counting late-arriving absentee ballots, but comes as the justices are considering whether to revive a Republican congressman’s lawsuit challenging a similar law […] The post Supreme Court Takes Up Post-Election Day Mail-in Balloting Case appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

President Trump issued pardons to Rudy Giuliani, John Eastman, Mark Meadows, Harrison Floyd, Tyler Bowyer, Christina Bobb, Boris Epshteyn, Jenna Ellis, Sidney Powell, Jeffrey Clark, Kelli Ward and others who were falsely prosecuted in the electors case of 2022. They were caught up in the “fake elector’s case”. The attorneys involved were, in many cases, […] The post Trump Pardons 77 In Fake Case Against Electors appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

President Donald Trump said on Monday that he wants to pay the majority of Americans $2,000 each from U.S. tariff revenue and use the “left over” funds to achieve debt reduction. Trump argued that there would be enough tariff revenue to send stipends to all Americans — other than high-income earners — and “to SUBSTANTIALLY PAY DOWN NATIONAL DEBT.” “All money left over from the $2000 payments made to low and middle income USA Citizens, from the massive Tariff Income pouring into our Country from foreign countries, which will be substantial, will be used to SUBSTANTIALLY PAY DOWN NATIONAL DEBT. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” Trump wrote on Truth Social. The national debt recently surpassed $38 trillion and is on pace to hit $44 trillion by 2029. More than four-fifths of Americans would qualify for Trump’s dividends if his proposal is enacted. As of 2024, 81% of the U.S. population is in the middle- or lower-income classes, according to Gallup. On Sunday, Trump called anyone who opposes his tariffs “FOOLS” and promised to hand out $2,000 dividends to Americans as the U.S. raked in nearly $2 billion in tariff revenue through the first three quarters of fiscal year 2025, according to the Treasury Department. “We are now the Richest, Most Respected Country In the World, With Almost No Inflation, and A Record Stock Market Price,” Trump wrote. “401k’s are Highest EVER. We are taking in Trillions of Dollars and will soon begin paying down our ENORMOUS DEBT, $37 Trillion. Record Investment in the USA, plants and factories going up all over the place. A dividend of at least $2000 a person (not including high income people!) will be paid to everyone.” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told ABC’s “This Week” on Sunday that he had not discussed the $2,000 dividend proposal with the president, adding that it “could come in lots of forms and lots of ways.” Trump’s desire to hand out $2,000 checks to Americans would need Congressional approval. Earlier this year, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) introduced legislation to give Americans $600 tariff rebates, or $2,400 for a family of four. Hawley’s bill, however, has not gained any traction in the Republican-controlled Senate. It’s not the first time Trump has floated the idea of handing out stipends to Americans while also paying down the national debt this term. Earlier this year, Trump suggested that Americans could receive government checks as a result of massive spending cuts proposed by the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative. In February, SpaceX owner and former Trump adviser Elon Musk discussed handing out $5,000 dividend checks if his goal of $2 trillion in government spending cuts was met. The proposal would allocate 20% of the DOGE savings to dividend checks and another 20% to the national debt. At the time, Trump told reporters he supported the plan, but the idea seems to have lost momentum, and Musk later downgraded his spending-cut goal to $150 billion. Trump’s promise to hand out tariff revenue to Americans comes at a critical time for his tariff agenda as the Supreme Court weighs whether he has the authority to impose the worldwide tariffs. The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on Trump’s tariff case last week, with multiple conservative justices appearing skeptical of the president’s authority, The Daily Wire previously reported. The key questions at issue in the case revolve around the meaning of the phrase “regulate importation” in the law, whether a tariff can be considered a tax, and the tension between the president’s broad authority over foreign policy and Congress’s authority over taxation.  A ruling against Trump’s tariff authority would effectively stop his most important economic and foreign policy agenda in its tracks. In another post on Truth Social on Sunday, Trump pushed back against some of the arguments against his tariffs and argued that the president must be allowed to impose tariffs on foreign countries for national security. “So, let’s get this straight??? The President of the United States is allowed (and fully approved by Congress!) to stop ALL TRADE with a Foreign Country (Which is far more onerous than a Tariff!), and LICENSE a Foreign Country, but is not allowed to put a simple Tariff on a Foreign Country, even for purposes of NATIONAL SECURITY,” Trump said. “That is NOT what our great Founders had in mind! The whole thing is ridiculous! Other Countries can Tariff us, but we can’t Tariff them??? It is their DREAM!!! Businesses are pouring into the USA ONLY BECAUSE OF TARIFFS. HAS THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT NOT BEEN TOLD THIS??? WHAT THE HELL IS GOING ON???”

WASHINGTON—The Senate’s move towards ending the government shutdown sent shockwaves through the Democratic Party, pitting former allies against each other — including a senator and her daughter. New Hampshire Senator Jeanne Shaheen was one of the Democrats who voted to break the filibuster Sunday night, a necessary first step towards ending the longest-ever government shutdown. Many Democrats opposed the move, claiming the shutdown will all be for naught if lawmakers cannot guarantee an extension of Obamacare subsidies. Shaheen acknowledged this opposition in a statement framing her vote less as a win than a necessity. “This agreement gives Democrats control of the Senate floor — at a time when Republicans control every level of power — on one of our top legislative priorities: Extending the enhanced premium tax credits to make health care more affordable for millions of Americans,” Shaheen said. “There is no one in the Senate who wants to see these tax credits extended more than me,” the Senator added. “But weeks of negotiations with Republicans have made clear that they will not address health care as part of shutdown talks — and that waiting longer will only prolong the pain Americans are feeling because of the shutdown.” Not everyone agrees with Shaheen. That includes the senator’s daughter, Stefany, who’s running in New Hampshire’s First Congressional District. “Improving health care has been the cause of my life,” the younger Shaheen said. “It’s why I am running for Congress. So I cannot support this deal when Speaker Johnson refuses to even allow a vote to extend health care tax credits.” “Too many people will see health care costs that are already too high skyrocket even further starting in January,” she added. “This means more people will be uninsured, unable to see a doctor in times of need, and risk bankruptcy because of a diagnosis.” Lawmakers who favored keeping the government closed say that extending Obamacare subsidies was essential, since premiums would skyrocket if they expire at the end of this year. Republicans say that the need for these subsidies is proof that the Affordable Care Act was unaffordable to begin with, and that the subsidies were not worth holding the government hostage. Stefany Shaheen has a foot in each camp, saying, “We need to both end this shutdown and extend the ACA tax credits. Otherwise, no deal.” It’s essential to ensure people have access to health care, and it’s past time to put paychecks back into people’s pockets and food back on families’ tables,” she added. The Cook Political Report ranks Shaheen’s race as a “Likely Democrat.” The seat is currently held by Rep. Chris Pappas (D-NH), who is running to succeed the elder Shaheen, who plans to retire upon finishing her term in 2027. The federal government has not reopened as of Monday early afternoon, as the legislation in the Senate still needs a final vote before it heads to the Republican-majority House, and presumably President Donald Trump’s desk afterward. Shaheen did not respond to a request for comment on her daughter’s statement.

Four staffers who recorded themselves confronting the head of Human Resources at Condé Nast over recent layoffs at Teen Vogue have been fired. The clips were filmed on Wednesday outside HR exec Stan Duncan’s office at One World Trade Center in New York City. In the awkward clip, a crowd of employees stand outside Duncan’s office and badger him about the layoffs, prompting him to repeatedly tell them to “go back to the workplace.” Four of those employees were later fired for “extreme misconduct,” per Deadline. Those individuals included Jasper Lo from the New Yorker, Jake Lahut from Wired, Alma Avalle from Bon Appétit, and Ben Dewey from Condé Nast Entertainment. In the video, Duncan can be heard telling employees to refrain from “congregating” outside his office. “What counts as congregating?” Lahut said. “What’s your definition of congregating?” “We’d appreciate if you would go back to the workplace, to your workplace assignments,” Duncan responded. “Is there a place that you’d be able to speak to us?” Avalle said to Duncan. “Do you think we’re not worth speaking to, Stan?” “Those are your words, not mine,” Duncan said. “But they might be your beliefs!” Avalle replied. “They’re not my beliefs,” Duncan can be heard saying. “Well, we have some quick questions. If you answered them, we’d be happy to go back to our desks,” Alvalle tried again. “Are you running away from us?” Alvalle said incredulously as Duncan started leading the group away from his office. “We’re concerned about our colleagues,” a person off camera said.  “We’d like you to answer questions,” Avalle said. “We’d love to move forward.” The most brutally awkward thing you’ll see today: Condé Nast staffers confront head of HR Stan Duncan over layoffs outside his 34th-floor office. Four of the employees featured in this exclusive video from the confrontation were then fired for “extreme misconduct.” The whole… pic.twitter.com/Ze6Vmyz0iI — TheWrap (@TheWrap) November 6, 2025 In a statement, Condé Nast said that “extreme misconduct is unacceptable in any professional setting. This includes aggressive, disruptive and threatening behavior of any kind.” “We remain committed to working constructively with the union and all of our employees.” The media giant also said they have filed a charge with the National Labor Relations Board against the News Guild of New York “for their repeated and egregious disregard of our collective bargaining agreement.” Meanwhile, the guild took the side of the fired employees, writing, “These terminations are a flagrant breach of the Just Cause terms of our contract and an unprecedented violation of their federally protected rights as union members to participate in collective action.” Avalle, a transgender-identifying employee who was one of those participating in the incident, wrote about it on X. “I love my job, I love my coworkers, and I love my union. I’m devastated the company made this move. There are so few trans women in media at all — particularly ones who aren’t confined to ‘Queer Media’ — and I was incredibly proud of what my position at Bon Appétit meant at large,” the post said. “More important to me than my identity, I am also the Vice President of the NewsGuild of New York, and targeting me with a blatantly retaliatory termination like this feels like an egregious shot against our union and against media workers as a whole.”