Elon Musk was the first to soften after the heated battle with President Trump. He took down the Epstein posts which were unsubstantiated and simply mean. Then, he started sharing Trump’s posts and making positive comments about the administration. President Trump went from saying he would sell the red Tesla parked in front of the […] The post Musk and Trump Are Probably Going to Reconcile Soon appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

A reporter asked President Trump today if we could expect similar ICE operations to what we saw in LA throughout the country. Trump said “Yes, we’re moving murderers out of our country.” Goodbye Bad Hombres The people are criminals who let these criminals in our country, Trump told the reporters, and the foreign criminals will […] The post Burning the Waymos & Trump’s Tough Response to Crazies appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Responding to a clip of President Donald Trump saying he wished him well, Elon Musk posted a heart emoji, hinting that their public feud could be dissipating and better things might lie ahead. Reporters tried to bait Trump into attacking Musk, but he refused to take the bait. Instead, he took the high road and spoke well of his former senior advisor. “Are you gonna get rid of the Tesla and the Starlink service that you have here at the White House?” a reporter asked. “No, I haven’t heard that,” Trump replied. “I mean, I may move the Tesla around a little bit — I don’t think we are going to be doing that. With Starlink, it’s a good service.” The reporter then threw a softball that Trump swatted with a comedic answer, asking, “Where you gonna move it to? Move it around, what do you mean?” “I have a lot of locations. I’ve got so many locations that I don’t know what to do with them all,” Trump quipped. Another reporter asked Trump about a reported fight between Musk and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, asking, “Did you ever see Elon Musk get physical with the Treasury Secretary?” “No, I didn’t. They did have an argument, but I didn’t see a lot of physicality there,” Trump responded, before turning away another question about reported drug use by Musk. “There was this New York Times report that he did not want to talk about — Elon Musk — that alleged that he, towards the end of his time in the White House, was blurring the lines between recreational use of drugs and medicinal. Do you think he ever had drugs here at the White House?” the reporter pressed. Trump decided to quit fencing and cut to the heart of the matter: “I really don’t know; I don’t think so. I hope not. Look, I wish him well; you understand. We had a good relationship, and I just wish him well. Very well, actually.” Trump’s refusal to rip Musk apparently moved Musk enough that he signaled his gratitude with a heart emoji. ❤️ — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 9, 2025 The Trump-Musk feud started after Trump withdrew his nomination of Jared Isaacman, a Musk ally, to be the next Administrator of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) on May 31. On June 3, Musk ripped Trump’s budget bill, calling it “a disgusting abomination.” On June 5, Trump responded, “I’m very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here. Better than you people. He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it. Then, all of a sudden, he had a problem,” adding, “I’m very disappointed in Elon. I’ve helped Elon a lot.” I’m very disappointed in Elon. I’ve helped Elon a lot.” “I’ve always liked Elon and I was very surprised. You saw the words he had for me. And he hasn’t said anything about me that’s bad. I would rather have him criticize me than the bill. The bill is incredible,” Trump also stated. The same day, Musk posted on X, “Is it time to create a new political party in America that actually represents the 80% in the middle?” Trump said that day, “Elon was ‘wearing thin,’ I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!” He added, “The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon’s Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn’t do it!” Musk reacted by calling Trump’s posts “an obvious lie,” adding, “So sad.” Musk responded to Trump’s threat to end the government contracts with SpaceX, writing, “This just gets better and better. Go ahead, make my day.” Musk later accused Trump of being named in the Jeffrey Epstein files and wrote, “In light of the President’s statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.” But as harsh as their rhetoric has been toward each other, it seems both men might be willing to make amends.

A commentator on CNN defended the anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles, claiming that California and the Southwest region of the United States once belonged to Mexico. “It is almost 50 percent Hispanic. Remember that California was part of Mexico, all of the Southwest is Mexico,” former Univision anchor Maria Elena Salinas said on CNN while discussing the protests and riots against ICE. “The roots are really deep in that region, and what they’re saying is ‘no, not in our community.’” UNHINGED: Former Univision anchor María Elena Salinas on CNN defending the rioting in Los Angeles: “California was part of Mexico, all of the Southwest is Mexico.” pic.twitter.com/Ue1cHMXtl9 — Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) June 10, 2025 Salinas’ comments come after days of violence in Los Angeles, with left-wing agitators throwing fireworks and rocks at law enforcement and lighting self-driving taxis on fire. ?? BREAKING POLICE HORSE BACK UNIT HIT WITH MASSIVE FIREWORK – MAJOR POLICE PUSH I am on the ground at the LA riots. This work is dangerous PLEASE FOLLOW pic.twitter.com/E3ESUGWk6t — Cam Higby | America First ?? (@camhigby) June 9, 2025 Several organizations behind the Los Angeles protests have argued that Mexico has a legitimate claim to California and the broader American Southwest, The Daily Wire revealed. Some even deny the legitimacy of the United States and want Mexico to reconquer the Southwestern states. An organization called Centro CSO pushes for “Chicano self-determination” and flies the flag of Aztlan, the mythical homeland of the Aztecs, which has been used as a symbol by political activists who deny America’s claim to the states it won in the Mexican-American War. One organizer with Centro CSO appeared to call for violence against federal law enforcement while speaking to a crowd of leftwing agitators. “They’re going to find out that we don’t play games out here,” the man, identified as Sammy Carrera, said, “We’re no longer going to be on the defense, we’re going to take the fight to them.” One far-left organizer behind the Los Angeles protests called on the agitators to ‘take the fight’ to ICE. “We’re no longer going to be on the defense, we’re going to take the fight to them.” pic.twitter.com/ekPNgeS9qn — Spencer Lindquist ?? (@SpencerLndqst) June 10, 2025 Union del Barrio, an equally radical group, also joined the protests. The race-based organization calls America an “illegal settler nation” and fights against “European colonialism” and the “Anglo settler.” The organization refers to the American Southwest as occupied Mexico and calls for international racial unity across the North and South American continents “to overturn all manifestations of colonial, imperialist, and neoliberal oppression” and reclaim the states won by the United States in its war with Mexico.

Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-CA) attempted to lay a trap for Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth during a Tuesday hearing, demanding to know which federal law justified sending the National Guard in to quell violent riots on the streets of Los Angeles — and Hegseth made it clear that he would not be baited. Aguilar began his time by reading a section of U.S. Code 12406, saying that the federal statute allowed for three separate conditions under which the federal government would be justified in deploying the National Guard domestically: foreign invasion, rebellion against the federal government, and a president’s inability to effectively enforce the law. WATCH: Q: U.S. Code 12406 cites three examples to implement Guard. What is the justification to use the Guard: 1. Invasion by foreign nation. 2. In the event of a rebellion or danger of rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States. 3. If the President is… pic.twitter.com/g91l0iZ3kO — DOD Rapid Response (@DODResponse) June 10, 2025 “The U.S. Code 12406, the legal basis that the president used, cites three examples and circumstances for the guard,” Aguilar began. “Invasion by a foreign nation, a rebellion or a dangerous rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States, or the president is unable for — with regular forces — to execute the laws of the United States.” “Which authority is triggered here to justify the use?” Aguilar asked Hegseth directly. “I don’t know, you just read it yourself and people can listen themselves,” Hegseth said, adding, “It sounds like all three to me. If you’ve got millions of illegals and you don’t know where they’re coming from, they’re waving flags from foreign countries, and assaulting police officers and the president’s officers, that’s a problem.” Gift Dad an All Access Membership. Use code DAD40 at checkout to save 40%! Aguilar kept talking over Hegseth, asking, “Do you think the president’s unable to execute the laws of the United States? You just said — that the president is unable to execute the laws of the United States?” “The Governor of California is unable to execute the laws of the United States,” Hegseth shot back. “The Governor of California has failed to protect his people, along with the Mayor of Los Angeles, so President Trump has said he will protect our agents, and our Guard and Marines are proud to do it.” President Donald Trump deployed the National Guard to quell the riots after violent protesters damaged public and private property — and attacked Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents and local law enforcement — in their efforts to prevent ICE from executing federal law as directed by the president.

President Donald Trump made it abundantly clear that he would not back down from intervening in the anti-ICE riots in Los Angeles, declaring, “I am not playing around.” On Monday night, Trump mobilized an additional 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles to join the 2,000 Guardsmen deployed by the Trump administration over the weekend, along with 700 Marines that were sent on Monday. “If I didn’t ‘SEND IN THE TROOPS’ to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now, much like 25,000 houses burned to the ground in L.A. due to an incompetent Governor and Mayor,” Trump posted on Truth Social on Tuesday morning. Later in the day, speaking to a panel on Fox Business, Trump stated, “Last night was terrible. The night before that was terrible. As you’ve seen, it was on most of your networks, people with big, heavy hammers pounding the concrete and pounding curbs, pounding, breaking up, and handing these big chunks of concrete to people. And they were taking that concrete, going up on bridges, and dropping it into the roof of a car. They were throwing it at our police; they were throwing it at our soldiers that are there.” “And we got it stopped and we have them in custody right now,” he continued. “Look, if we didn’t get involved, right now, Los Angeles would be burning just like it was burning a number of months ago with all the houses that were lost. Los Angeles right now would be on fire. And we have it in great shape. I am not playing around.” President @realDonaldTrump: “If we didn’t get involved, right now, Los Angeles would be burning… and we have it in great shape. I am not playing around." pic.twitter.com/Cj0JuW4YMd — Trump War Room (@TrumpWarRoom) June 10, 2025 California filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration on Monday over the National Guard deployment, arguing that the president infringed on Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom’s role without there being a clear threat of “invasion” or “rebellion.” Sending in the National Guard is a power typically exercised by governors but also granted to the president in certain circumstances. But National Review published an editorial explaining why Trump has the right to send the National Guard: The president is relying on what a 1971 Office of Legal Counsel memo called his “inherent authority to use troops for the protection of federal property and federal functions,” as well as 10 U.S.C. 12406, which provides for the emergency mobilization of the National Guard. That statute says the president can call up the Guard when there’s an actual or threatened invasion or rebellion, or when he can’t execute the laws with regular federal forces. Given what’s being done to attack and obstruct ICE agents who are simply enforcing the immigration laws, the latter condition applies. This is not an invocation of the Insurrection Act, which would involve federal troops taking on general law-enforcement functions. Instead, the role of the Guard is limited, as the presidential proclamation stipulates, to ensuring“the protection and safety of Federal personnel and property.” “There need not be an actual rebellion — only the danger of one — for the president legitimately to call the Guard into federal service,” former Assistant United States Attorney Andrew McCarthy, who led the 1995 terrorism prosecution against Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman and eleven others,  added. “Moreover, the explicit purpose of the ongoing rioting and mayhem is to thwart the enforcement of the federal immigration laws. Section 12406 expressly authorizes the use of military force when ordinary law enforcement has been violently prevented from carrying out federal functions.” Zach Jewell contributed to this article.

A big tech company refused to work with any organization denounced by the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), a left-wing group that has been frequently criticized for smearing conservative organizations as “hate groups.” In an email reviewed by The Daily Wire, an employee of Bonterra Tech — which provides customer relationship management software to nonprofits — declined to work with the Ruth Institute, which promotes biblical sexual values, because the SPLC named it a hate group. “It pains me to say that we cannot move forward with the Ruth Institute. It makes it even harder as I am aligned with the beliefs of your Organization and I think it’s absolutely RIDICULOUS that the SPLC gets to pick and choose who is a hate group,” the email said. “Doesn’t make any sense and they should be shut down. My CEO agrees that you shouldn’t be on there, she took it up to our board and they said that is one rule they will not make an exemption on. If an Organization is on the SPLC list, we cannot work with them.” This is the latest evidence that Bonterra discriminates against conservatives. In a 2024 report to the Senate Commerce Committee, Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) revealed that Bonterra’s terms of service prohibited it from working with clients that denied “rights to the LGBTQ community,” “a woman’s right to reproductive choice,” “racial justice,” or “climate change.” At the same time EveryAction stipulated that nonprofits it worked with could not be “Not Progressive Aligned,” meaning that they “Can’t be a Republican org,” “Can’t go against LGBT+,” and “Can’t be against pro-choice.” Bonterra also refused to renew contracts with Wisconsin Right to Life, Idaho Family Policy Center, Deaconess Pregnancy & Adoptions, and Stand for Health Freedom. Cruz believes that Bonterra weaponized its policies to deny conservatives access to its services. “My committee’s investigation exposed what we long expected: Big Tech companies like Bonterra have used vague, broadly worded terms of service agreements as a political weapon to deny conservatives access to essential business technology,” Cruz told The Daily Wire. “Conservative companies should not be forced to choose between staying silent or potentially shutting down.” Cruz on Tuesday is introducing the “TERMS Act,” legislation he told The Daily Wire would challenge “the unchecked power” of “Big Tech oligarchs and protect the right of free speech for every American business targeted by Big Tech censorship.” Cruz’s proposal would mandate that online service providers “disclose their acceptable use policies, provide users with written notice before the termination of a user’s account, and publish an annual report detailing actions taken to enforce their acceptable use policies, and for other purposes,” according to a copy of the bill shared with The Daily Wire.  The bill would mandate that acceptable use policies are publicly disclosed and easily accessible, that customers would be given advance warning of account restriction or cancellation, and post public reports of enforcement of acceptable use policies. Republican Senators Marsha Blackburn (TN), Katie Britt (AL), Tom Cotton (AK), Mike Crapo (ID), Cynthia Lummis (WY), Jim Risch (ID), Senator Roger Marshall (KS), and Eric Schmitt (MS) are also backing the legislation. The Southern Poverty Law Center was founded by a former employee of the notorious segregationist George Wallace, who decided opposing white supremacy was a more profitable path. As The Daily Wire has reported last year, the group doxxed employees of Not The Bee, a Babylon Bee affiliate site that publishes true stories so absurd that they seem like parodies. “They did it because they’re left-wing activists masquerading as journalists,” Babylon Bee CEO Seth Dillon said at the time, calling the group a “scandal-ridden smear factory.”