A cast of uglies from the swamp attended Dick Cheney’s funeral today. President Trump and JD Vance were not invited. I am sure they were fine with that. Schifty Schiff got an invite after all his efforts to frame Donald Trump. Mitch McConnell was there, Lisa Murkowski, and Lindsey Graham. George W. Bush, Joe Biden, […] The post The Swamp Comes Out for Dick Cheney’s Funeral appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

The Trump administration is taking on yet another blue state for issuing commercial driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has threatened to withhold $75 million in federal funding from Pennsylvania if the state refuses to stop handing out trucking licenses to illegal immigrant drivers, The Daily Wire has learned. It comes after an Uzbek illegal immigrant who had an international warrant for terrorist activity was pulled over in Kansas and discovered to have a Pennsylvania commercial driver’s license. Duffy highlighted his concerns in a letter sent to Democratic Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro on Wednesday, claiming that Pennsylvania issued “non-domiciled CDLs [commercial driver’s licenses] with an expiration date that extended well beyond the driver’s authorized stay in the United States and failed “to require any proof of lawful presence before issuing a CDL [commercial driver’s license].” “Under President Trump, this Department is taking every measure to ensure dangerous foreign drivers aren’t illegally operating 40-ton vehicles on American roads,” Duffy said in a statement shared with The Daily Wire on Thursday. He continued: “Joe Biden allowed tens of millions of illegals to pour into our country through open borders, including a suspected terrorist who Pennsylvania then allowed to get behind the wheel of a semitruck. I will continue to fight to get these dangerous drivers off our roads to protect American families and support our national security.” In response to a series of fatal crashes, the Trump administration has taken steps to stop the issuance of commercial licenses to illegal immigrants, while also auditing states that have already handed them out. Right now, DailyWire+ annual memberships are fifty percent off during our Black Friday sale. Join now at dailywire.com/blackfriday. Much of the blame has been placed on California, which issued 17,000 non-domiciled commercial driver’s licenses to foreign drivers, the agency said earlier this month. Non-domiciled commercial driver’s licenses allow truckers certified in one state to work for companies in other states. The Department of Transportation has already withheld $40 million from California after a federal investigation found that state authorities weren’t enforcing the English-language requirement for truck drivers. Florida is also suing California after illegal immigrant Harjinder Singh, who was issued a commercial driver’s license in the Golden State, allegedly killed three people while making an illegal U-turn in August in the Sunshine State. Shapiro’s office didn’t immediately respond to The Daily Wire’s request for comment.

Rep. Jasmine Crockett got pushback from CNN anchor Kaitlan Collins — and a warning from Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin — when she threw maximum effort into damage control on Wednesday, doubling down on comments she’d made earlier in the day. Crockett, on the House floor, had made an attempt to tie a number of Republicans — from former Utah Senator Mitt Romney to Zeldin, among others — to the late convicted pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, but her gamble went sideways when it turned out she was talking about the wrong Jeffrey Epstein. Collins cornered Crockett on the subject on Wednesday evening, noting that after she’d claimed “somebody named Jeffrey Epstein” had donated to numerous Republican campaigns, Zeldin had informed her that those donations were made by Dr. Jeffrey Epstein, whose only connection to the disgraced financier was an unfortunate coincidence with regard to his name. Crockett, when confronted, doubled down — and prompted Zeldin to fire off a warning in response. WATCH: Rep. Jasmine Crockett responds to Lee Zeldin saying he never took donations from that Jeffrey Epstein — but instead a physician who is also named Jeffrey Epstein — following her comments on the floor. pic.twitter.com/ReN4IbTW6K — Kaitlan Collins (@kaitlancollins) November 20, 2025 Collins showed video of Crockett, on the House floor, saying that her team had uncovered donations from “somebody named Jeffrey Epstein” to “Mitt Romney, the NRCC, Lee Zeldin, George Bush, WinRed, McCain-Palin, Rick Lazio …” “Yes, Crockett, a physician named Dr. Jeffrey Epstein (who is a totally different person than the other Jeffrey Epstein) donated to a prior campaign of mine,” Zeldin had replied at the time. When prompted to respond, Crockett said, “Listen, I never said that it was that Jeffrey Epstein. Just so that people understand, when you make a donation, your picture is not there.” She then blamed her mistake on Republicans, claiming they had not given her enough time to prepare, so she threw out that accusation to teach them a lesson about the dangers of making accusations without doing proper research first. “And because they decided to spring this on us in real time, I wanted the Republicans to think about what could potentially happen because I knew that they didn’t even try to go through the FEC. So my team, what they did is they Googled,” she said. “And that is specifically why I said, ‘a’ Jeffrey Epstein. Unlike Republicans, I at least don’t go out and just tell lies. Because it was not the same one, that’s fine. But when Lee Zeldin had something to say, all he had to say was it was a different Jeffrey Epstein. He admitted that he did receive donations from a Jeffrey Epstein. So at least I wasn’t trying to mislead people.” Right now, DailyWire+ annual memberships are fifty percent off during our Black Friday sale. Join now at dailywire.com/blackfriday. Crockett went on to suggest that the Jeffrey Epstein in question could still potentially be the convicted pedophile: “Now, have I dug in to find out who this doctor is? I have not. So I will trust and take what he says, that it wasn’t that Jeffrey Epstein, but I was not attempting to mislead anybody. I literally had maybe 20 minutes before I had to do that debate.” Collins appeared taken aback by Crockett’s argument, noting,  “Yeah, but people might see that and say, well, you’re trying to make it sound like he took money from a literal sex offender.” “But I literally did not know,” Crockett protested, adding, “Within 20 minutes, you could not find that out, not from just doing a quick search on FEC. So, number one, I made sure that I was clear that it was a Jeffrey Epstein, but I never said that it specifically that Jeffrey Epstein because I knew that we would need more time to really dig in.” Zeldin fired back again, saying, “When you find yourself in a hole, it’s best to stop digging.” He said that in addition to public FEC documents stating that the donor to his campaign was a physician, it was worth noting that the donations she was referring to had been made after the convicted pedophile had died by apparent suicide in a New York jail cell.

A panel of federal judges heard a case on Wednesday challenging North Carolina’s new congressional maps that add another Republican-favored seat, just days after Texas said they’re taking an appeal to the Supreme Court over their own maps. The plaintiffs in the case, including the North Carolina NAACP, have argued that racial gerrymandering occurred in the creation of the map by the Republican-led legislature, and a decision from the court is expected by December 1, according to WXII 12. “North Carolina Democrats continue to fight for fair representation — and now this fight turns to the courts. Echoing what we saw in Texas, North Carolina Republicans passed a rigged congressional map that further weakens the voting power of Black and Brown communities across the state,” Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin said in a statement Thursday. However, Republicans in North Carolina have argued that this was to counteract longtime gerrymandering efforts in blue states. “Across the country, Democrat-run states have spent decades ensuring that Republicans would be drawn out of Congress,” North Carolina Senate Leader Phil Berger said on October 21. “North Carolina Republicans will not sit quietly and watch Democrats continue to ignore the will of the people in an attempt to force their liberal agenda on our citizens. This new map respects the will of the North Carolina voters who sent President Trump to the White House three times,” Berger added. Right now, DailyWire+ annual memberships are fifty percent off during our Black Friday sale. Join now at dailywire.com/blackfriday. Multiple court cases have been in the spotlight when it comes to mid-decade redistricting nationwide, including in California and Texas. Texas’ map, signed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott, was blocked by a federal court earlier this week, which said that the state must use their 2021 maps instead. Abbott said the case will be appealed to the Supreme Court next, calling the ruling “clearly erroneous.” “The public perception of this case is that it’s about politics,” the ruling from the federal panel in Texas stated. “To be sure, politics played a role in drawing the 2025 map. Substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 map.” Attorney General Ken Paxton said he “fully expect[s] the [Supreme] Court to uphold Texas’s sovereign right to engage in partisan redistricting.” In California, the Justice Department and the California Republican Party are suing over the maps that are set to go into effect with the passage of Proposition 50 earlier this month, which created five Democrat-favored seats to counteract Texas’ five Republican-favored seats drawn in their redistricting process. “The race-based gerrymandered maps passed by the California legislature are unlawful and unconstitutional. We are moving swiftly to prevent these illegal maps from tainting our upcoming elections,” First Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Central District of California Bill Essayli posted to X regarding the Golden State case. “California is free to draw congressional maps, but they may not be drawn based on race.” The complicated mid-decade redistricting fight is not contained to those states, as President Donald Trump wants Indiana to redraw its maps for two more Republican-favored seats, and Florida is expected to redraw their maps to allow more Republicans as well — and other blue and red states could also be making changes. It’s unclear who will ultimately come out on top. Redistricting could further accelerate depending on how the Supreme Court rules in Louisiana v. Callais, which could scrap or make changes to how Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act is followed and enable more Republican seats to be drawn, especially in the southern United States.

Thanksgiving and Christmas offer people a great time to travel, spend time with family, and take a brief break from the normal rhythm of life. But the season can also increase stress for millions of people as they try to plan the perfect holiday and buy the best gifts. A study from the American Psychiatric Association released last year found that holiday stress has increased. Nearly 30% of Americans surveyed in the 2024 study said that they experienced more stress related to the holidays than they did the previous year. Forty-seven percent of those experiencing stress around the holidays linked their stress to grieving a lost loved one. Following close behind that reason was stress about affording holiday gifts (46%).  The American Psychiatric Association’s 2024 study was the fourth straight year that the group looked into holiday stress, and in each study, it has found that people stress about affording gifts and affording holiday meals.  It’s a sad truth that Americans are often the most anxious when we’re supposed to be celebrating and enjoying time with loved ones. But there’s one ritual that could remind you to slow down, relax, and enjoy each holiday moment this year: a relaxing evening with a cigar. That’s where Mayflower Cigars comes in. At Mayflower, we know your Thanksgiving and Christmas season can get crazy, and we also know how important it is for you to take a deep breath and get some relaxation.  Whether you reach for the Mayflower Dawn, with its elegant notes of wood, coffee, and cream — a graceful companion for morning light and long conversations… or the Mayflower Dusk, rich with cocoa, espresso, and black pepper — a bolder blend for nights by the fire… or perhaps the Mayflower Dream, a double-maduro that speaks with soft, lingering notes of chicory, cardamom, oak, and a hint of caramel — a cigar made not just for the moment, but for memory — each Mayflower cigar is more than a smoke. It’s a pause. A breath. A return to tradition. Up to 50% off razors & DW Shop, up to 50% off Candle Club, up to 25% off Mayflower — bundles, gifts, & last-chance holiday shipping Looking to explore, savor, and share all three? Enjoy the new Mayflower Trinity 8-Cigar Assortment — perfect for gathering and gifting alike. This season, amid the clamor and chaos, may your finest moments be the quiet ones — anchored by family, elevated by friendship, and accompanied by a cigar worthy of the occasion. Mayflower cigars does not sell tobacco products to anyone under the age of 21. If you are not at least 21 years of age, please do not enter our website. WARNING: This product contains nicotine. Nicotine is an addictive chemical. Mayflower Cigars shares common ownership with The Daily Wire.

The curious case of a GOP staffer found with shocking allegations on her body quickly unraveled into an accusation of a hoax. Alleged Attack in the Woods Natalie Greene, 26, a constituent advocate director for Representative Jeff Van Drew, was the center of a perplexing incident. Her friend called 911, reporting Greene had been attacked by three men while she was on a nature walk. The men allegedly left a Trump-related sex slur on her stomach and zip-tied her hands, a scenario that immediately sparked both outrage and skepticism. This incident, already peculiar, drew even more attention when law enforcement began to scrutinize the details. The physical evidence and patterns of behavior suggested inconsistencies with Greene’s account. Initial public sympathy began to shift as authorities hinted at the possibility of the incident being an elaborate hoax. VAN DREW STAFFER FAKED ATTACK, PAID $500 TO CARVE 'TRUMP WHORE' ON HERSELF Federal prosecutors charged 26-year-old Natalie Greene with staging an elaborate hoax where she claimed three men assaulted her for working for Rep. Jeff Van Drew. The Rutgers law student actually… pic.twitter.com/pWc3zgcYuX — Mario Nawfal (@MarioNawfal) November 20, 2025 The Investigation Unfolds The investigation into Greene’s claims unfolded rapidly. Forensic analysis and witness interviews led to doubts about the veracity of her story. The inconsistencies in her narrative became glaring as the probe deepened. Greene’s actions and the timeline she provided did not match the physical evidence collected at the scene, leading investigators to reconsider the initial reports of an attack. The revelation that the incident might have been staged brought up questions about Greene’s motivations. Was this a political statement gone wrong, a cry for help, or something else entirely? The implications of such a hoax touch on broader themes of trust and credibility within political circles. The Natalie Greene federal complaint is insane. Police found zip ties and duct tape in her Maserati and messages from a "body scar artist". A real attack would be just sharpie or just blades; not both. She wrote – not cut – the words because they'd be permanent.… pic.twitter.com/PfvGPLyxev — Luke (@CuriousLuke93x) November 20, 2025 Political Context and Implications This incident cannot be viewed in isolation from the broader political climate. Greene’s association with a GOP representative adds layers of complexity. In an era where political tensions run high, any incident involving allegations of violence or slander can have far-reaching consequences. This case could impact public perception of political discourse, highlighting the potential for personal actions to influence broader narratives. The incident also opens discussions about mental health and the pressures faced by those in political positions. Was Greene driven by stress or political ideology, or is there a deeper personal issue at play? These are questions that remain unanswered but are crucial in understanding the full scope of the situation. The Aftermath and Public Reaction Public reaction to Greene’s story has been mixed. Initial outrage over the alleged attack quickly turned into skepticism and criticism as details emerged. The case has become a topic of debate, with discussions focusing on the implications of fabricating such a serious claim. The potential legal consequences for Greene, if proven to have staged the event, could be severe, impacting her career and personal life significantly. The broader implications of this incident continue to resonate. It serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between truth and perception in politics. As the investigation concludes, it will be important to consider both the individual and collective lessons from this complex and controversial case. Sources: Daily Mail Conservative Angle

'The largest funder of Al-Shabaab is the Minnesota taxpayer'

monetary policy can only do so much

'How are you getting that money'

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has agreed to enter into negotiations with U.S. officials on a Trump administration backed plan to end the war between Russia and Ukraine.   Zelenskyy will talk with President Donald Trump about the peace plan in the coming days, Axios reports.   U.S. officials are in Ukraine after Trump reportedly approved a plan to end the war between Russia and Ukraine. Army Secretary Daniel Driscoll and other senior Pentagon officials met with Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Svyrydenko Thursday morning to discuss an end to the war. Driscoll later spoke with Zelenskyy.   The conversations took place as smoke was still rising from an apartment building in Western Ukraine following a Russian strike.   “Tragically, tonight, the people of Ternopil suffered the most from Russian aggression in this massive attack,” Zelenskyy wrote on X. At least 26 people have been confirmed dead and many more are missing.   All night long, our rescuers worked in Ternopil, and search-and-rescue operations are still ongoing. 22 people are still missing – the effort to find them continues. More than 230 first responders from nine regions of Ukraine have been deployed. In some areas, work can only be… pic.twitter.com/3wrrdwIiNd— Volodymyr Zelenskyy / ????????? ?????????? (@ZelenskyyUa) November 20, 2025 The 28-point peace plan, which CBS News reports has received a green light from Trump, is believed to freeze the current battle line, which would require Ukraine to give up a significant amount of its eastern territory.  “It’s not reasonable to give Russia more [territory] than they already achieved during the invasion,” Jaroslaw Cwiek-Karpowicz, director of the Polish Institute of International Affairs, told The Daily Signal. At the same time, Ukraine needs a peace deal that will allow the nation to “begin to reconstruct and modernize,” Cwiek-Karpowicz added.   In his assessment, Cwiek-Karpowicz says he is not sure if Russia is interested in a ceasefire with Ukraine, adding that Russia still believes “they can advance the front.”   If Russia were to agree to a deal, Russian President Vladimir Putin would trumpet any concessions from Ukraine as a Russian victory, Pawel Markiewicz, executive director of the Polish Institute of International Affairs District of Columbia office, explained. Putin would then use this perceived “victory” to pursue a “new imperial foreign policy,” he said.   It is estimated that over a million Russians have either been killed or wounded in the war with Ukraine, another reason why Russia “needs” a perceived victory, according to Pawel Burdzy, the District of Columbia deputy director for the Polish Institute of International Affairs.  Details of the 28-point plan have not emerged, but, according to Axios, Putin adviser Kirill Dmitriev said he worked with Trump administration special envoy Steve Witkoff to craft the plan. The peace deal is expected to include security guarantees for Ukraine.   Dmitriev told Axios he feels that this plan is significant because “the Russian position is really being heard.”   Ukraine’s leaders have repeatedly said they are not interested in a deal that gives Russia more Ukrainian territory. It might be possible, according to Markiewicz, that Ukraine would consider giving up the Donbas region since that part of Ukraine has experienced conflict with Russia since 2014. But giving up any territory would be a “a tough pill to swallow” for the Ukrainians, Markiewicz added.   The post Ukraine Agrees To Enter Negotiations on Us Backed Plan To End War With Russia appeared first on The Daily Signal.