A resurfaced C-SPAN clip is being used to bog down President Trump’s DHS reset just as the department sits shuttered and border enforcement hangs in the balance. Trump Moves to Swap DHS Leadership as the Agency Remains Shut Down President Trump announced on March 5, 2026, that Sen. Markwayne Mullin will be his pick to lead the Department of Homeland Security, with the change slated to take effect March 31. The move follows mounting turmoil around outgoing DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, whose standing reportedly collapsed inside the administration and among key senators. The practical problem is timing: multiple reports describe DHS as shut down during an ongoing funding standoff. Senate Majority Leader John Thune signaled Republicans want the process moving quickly, describing Mullin as “pretty well-vetted” and urging the Senate to get started. Mullin, for his part, has framed his approach as outreach-heavy, saying he wants to “earn everybody’s vote” and promising to work across the aisle. The basic test will be whether the Senate prioritizes operational continuity at DHS over partisan leverage. Why Noem Was Pushed Out—and What That Means for Accountability Reporting indicates the break with Noem was driven by a mix of controversies and internal frustration, including disputes about management and funding and the influence of adviser Corey Lewandowski. The research also cites a January 2026 incident in Minneapolis involving DHS agents killing two U.S. citizens, including 37-year-old Alex Pretti, followed by backlash after Noem labeled Pretti a “domestic terrorist” without evidence. Those events intensified pressure for a leadership change. Noem has defended her record and is described as moving into a Western Hemisphere role aimed at targeting cartels. Support for her also appeared uneven inside the Republican conference, with reporting that some GOP senators withdrew backing even as others defended her. With DHS overseeing border security, immigration enforcement, and disaster response, the bigger issue for Americans is whether the department can function predictably, lawfully, and under clear civilian leadership—especially during a funding impasse. What?!! @SenMullin praised and hugged Ashli Babbitt’s killer cop Michael Byrd? Is @realDonaldTrump aware of this? It doesn’t sound like there was a good vetting process in place! I miss @Sec_Noem already! https://t.co/ipX3XdPOAS pic.twitter.com/NU2KEdja7t — Hank (@HankishTwitZone) March 6, 2026 Democrats Signal a Confirmation Fight Tied to “Reforms” and DHS/ICE Overhauls Democratic leaders are signaling they will use the nomination as leverage. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer publicly opposed moving forward, tying his stance to demands for policy changes and arguing the “rot” goes beyond one secretary. The research also notes Democratic pressure for an ICE “overhaul” during broader DHS funding and reform battles. That approach ensures the nomination becomes a proxy war over immigration enforcement rather than a narrow debate about Mullin’s qualifications. Some Democratic reactions have been less uniformly hostile. Sen. John Fetterman, according to the research, called Mullin a “nice upgrade,” underscoring that the fight may be more about extracting concessions than opposing the nominee personally. Still, the Senate math and the pace of the process will matter. When confirmation becomes a bargaining chip, the immediate cost can be operational paralysis—exactly what Americans do not want from a security agency. The “Resurfaced Video” Narrative: What’s Verified and What Isn’t Online posts are circulating claims about a resurfaced video connected to Mullin, and the original story angle highlighted by the provided research frames the clip as “shocking.” However, the research summary itself cautions that specific details of the video are not verified in the available results, and no transcript or confirmed context is provided here. That makes it difficult to evaluate the clip’s substance without more primary documentation from the full recording. For readers frustrated by years of politicized bureaucracy and media spin, the key is separating what is documented from what is merely viral. Verified points include Trump’s nomination timeline, the intended March 31 transition, and the fact that Senate leaders are already staking out positions. If lawmakers want a serious confirmation process, they should focus on sworn testimony, documented records, and DHS’s mission—rather than letting an uncontextualized clip drive national security staffing decisions. Border Security, Funding, and the Constitutional Stakes of DHS Instability DHS was built to secure the homeland after 9/11, and today it sits at the center of two core federal responsibilities: enforcing immigration law and responding to disasters. The research indicates the agency’s shutdown is disrupting operations, which can ripple quickly into border communities and emergency management. For conservatives, the underlying concern is predictable: when Washington fails to fund or manage core functions, everyday Americans pay the price in safety and order. Is Markwayne Mullin a huge mistake?? Resurface video from C-SPAN in July 2021 has Mullin PRAISING Mike Byrd, the killer cop who MURDERED Ashli Babbitt in cold blood, calling him the real 'victim' and 'hero'#DHS #MarkwayneMullen #AshliBabbitthttps://t.co/BEzFQzv9zA — Phil Jones (@MAGAPhil1776) March 6, 2026 Republicans will likely argue that confirming a vetted nominee restores command clarity and helps execute the elected agenda on enforcement. Democrats appear positioned to trade confirmations and funding for structural changes, particularly around ICE. With limited detail available on the viral-video allegation in the research, the most concrete takeaway is this: the Senate fight is set, and DHS stability—border enforcement, disaster response, and lawful governance—hangs on whether politics overrides basic continuity. Sources: https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/05/markwayne-mullin-confirmation-dhs-00815293 https://www.politico.com/news/2026/03/05/markwayne-mullin-noem-dhs-00814761 https://www.cornyn.senate.gov/news/cornyn-on-president-trump-announcing-senator-markwayne-mullin-to-lead-dhs/ https://www.foxnews.com/politics/schumer-weaponizes-mullin-nomination-demand-dhs-overhaul-says-rot-goes-beyond-noem https://www.cbsnews.com/video/sen-markwayne-mullin-reacts-trumps-nomination-replace-kristi-noem/

The Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker went down over Iraq

'Like a hot knife through butter'

The first baseball park that Jackie Robinson ever played ball on is about to enjoy the fruits of a $30 million renovation that will bring it into the 21st century while maintaining its historic charm. Though he made his fame with the Dodgers, the first diamond Robinson ever played on was City Island Ballpark in […] The post Park Where Jackie Robinson First Played Baseball Gets Gorgeous $30 Million Renovation appeared first on Good News Network.

Fire up Episode 36 and come listen to Chad and Ken discuss their Top 5 SNES games of their youth. Will the guys keep the streak alive and match any of their selections? The only The post The Retro Resurgence Podcast – Episode 36 | Top Super Nintendo Entertainment System Titles appeared first on The Retro Network.

NEWSFLASH: Eric Swalwell Is Lying Scum

“We must be content with the fact that it was two citizens of our own city that enjoyed this privilege.”

This is what the birth of everything sounded like.

One does not usually think of the Patagonian desert or the Andean highlands as front lines of a strategic threat.But geography has a way of asserting itself in surprising places.In the dry, thin air of Neuquén, Argentina, or the high-altitude silence of Amachuma, Bolivia, the landscape is being remapped by high-gain dish antennas operating in S-, X-, and Ka-bands. They are described as instruments of science, part of a “Global South” solidarity that promises peaceful modernization and multipolar governance.In the vocabulary of space systems engineering, however, these sites are something else entirely: They are the “ground segment,” the nervous system that makes a satellite controllable and its data harvestable.In recent decades, the distinction between civilian and military space has effectively collapsed.Because the Earth rotates and orbits are indifferent to national boundaries, a space program requires a global footprint to maintain a reliable contact window. To command a spacecraft or manage sensitive telemetry, one needs a station on the other side of the globe to fill the coverage gap. In recent decades, China has found this “other side” in Latin America, accumulating a geographically distributed set of access points, some operated through joint ventures, others through 50-year leases.A ground station translates geography into data flows and turns orbital motion into actionable schedules, providing the ability to track satellites, receive their transmissions, and map space objects as a strategic inventory. These functions are logistical accelerators: They shorten delays and stabilize communications. They are militarily meaningful even when they are not overtly militarized.Consider the Neuquén deep-space station in Argentina. The 2014 Cooperation Agreement, registered with the United Nations, is a masterpiece of legal clarity and operational opacity. It grants China broad tax exemptions and includes a clause stating that the Argentine government “will not interfere with or interrupt” the station’s normal activities. The term of the agreement is 50 years. While a 2016 Additional Protocol stipulates that the facility is exclusively for nonmilitary use, the enforcement mechanism is nonexistent. Argentina has no physical oversight of the station’s operations; the host state owns the territory but lacks visibility into the software configurations, encryption layers, and the routing of the signals being collected. The station is a “black box” protected by treaty.RELATED: Russia's and China's superweapons are stunning the world. The US is struggling to catch up. Photo by GREG BAKER/AFP via Getty ImagesIn recent decades, the distinction between civilian and military space has effectively collapsed. Contemporary militaries depend on satellites for navigation, intelligence, and command-and-control. The ground facilities that return that data occupy a gray zone where science and security share the same hardware and the same personnel. This is what the U.S. Department of War calls “military-civil fusion”: the strategy of building military requirements into civilian infrastructure. The same 35-meter antenna that downlinks images of a distant nebula can eavesdrop on a competitor’s satellite or provide the tracking data necessary for counterspace targeting.The institutional arrangements reinforce this interpretation. The Neuquén site is managed by the Xi’an Satellite Control Center, which operates under China Satellite Launch and Tracking Control General. Western analysts note that CLTC was previously integrated into the PLA Strategic Support Force’s Space Systems Department. While a 2024 restructuring replaced the Strategic Support Force with a new Information Support Force, the strategic logic remains the same: tight integration of civilian and military capabilities under party-state direction.In Bolivia, the dynamic takes on a different hue, one of national prestige and financial dependency. The Amachuma ground station, while serving Bolivia’s communications satellite, also enables Beijing to surveil skies far beyond its own borders. The project arrived as a package: infrastructure plus credit, training, and political symbolism. It is a 21st-century iteration of dependency theory, where development arrives as a structural constraint. Whoever controls the “black box” controls not only the capability but also the narrative of what that capability is doing.The story repeats across the continent with minor variations. In Venezuela, ground stations like El Sombrero are physically embedded in military-adjacent geography, located within the Captain Manuel Ríos Aerospace Base. In Chile and Brazil, the infrastructure is softer: scientific collaborations and radio telescopes that can track near-Earth objects and improve space situational awareness, a foundational requirement for modern warfare.China’s 2025 policy paper on Latin America frames these projects as aerospace cooperation and an invitation to join the International Lunar Research Station. It uses a rhetoric of solidarity against unilateral bullying. By contrast, the 2026 House Select Committee report sees an integrated network that boosts the PLA’s warfighting capacity. This divergence results from the dual-use nature of the technology and the secrecy surrounding it. When the evidence is encrypted or contractually insulated, knowledge becomes a matter of which authority one trusts.Whoever can shorten the cycle from sensing to command gains the edge in a crisis. Latin America has become a geographically valuable extension of China’s ground segment, filling gaps in its coverage. These stations may not be actively engaged in military operations at the moment. One may nevertheless question why an infrastructure capable of such functions is being embedded so deeply, and so quietly, into the soil of the Western Hemisphere.