Rep. Don Bacon (R-NE) reportedly considered resignation due to his outrage over the Trump administration’s Russia-Ukraine peace proposal. Axios reports the Nebraska Republican said he contemplated resigning in protest. “He ultimately decided against it, he says, but not before giving Mike Johnson an earful,” Axios Congress reporter Andrew Solender said. NEW: Rep. Don Bacon tells @axios he was “so angry” last week about the Trump admin’s proposed Russia-Ukraine peace deal that he considered resigning in protest. He ultimately decided against it, he says, but not before giving Mike Johnson an earful. https://t.co/WBLNLB4RSM — Andrew Solender (@AndrewSolender) November 25, 2025 Axios shared more: The centrist foreign policy hawk, a staunch supporter of Ukraine, has already announced he plans to retire in 2027 rather than seek another term. He dubbed the proposal the “Witkoff Ukrainian surrender plan,” referring to Trump’s Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, who helped craft it. But “in the end I have a commitment to our constituents to fulfill my term,” Bacon said, adding that he “shared my anger” with House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) but “didn’t mention resignation.” Bacon’s threat is not an idle one — his early resignation would further dwindle an already narrow House Republican majority and suddenly put his highly competitive seat in play. “Congress must be proactive on Ukraine. The 28-point plan the Administration proposed last Thursday would have been disastrous to our nation’s honor and undermined European and our national security. We cannot sit on the sidelines any longer,” Bacon said. Congress must be proactive on Ukraine. The 28-point plan the Administration proposed last Thursday would have been disastrous to our nation’s honor and undermined European and our national security. We cannot sit on the sidelines any longer.https://t.co/r90Tppx9BE — Rep. Don Bacon (@RepDonBacon) November 25, 2025 “Over the past week, my team has made tremendous progress with respect to ending the War between Russia and Ukraine (A War that would have NEVER started if I were President!). Last month 25,000 soldiers died. The original 28-Point Peace Plan, which was drafted by the United States, has been fine-tuned, with additional input from both sides, and there are only a few remaining points of disagreement,” President Trump said on Tuesday. “In the hopes of finalizing this Peace Plan, I have directed my Special Envoy Steve Witkoff to meet with President Putin in Moscow and, at the same time, Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll will be meeting with the Ukrainians. I will be briefed on all progress made, along with Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth, and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles,” Trump continued. “I look forward to hopefully meeting with President Zelenskyy and President Putin soon, but ONLY when the deal to end this War is FINAL or, in its final stages. Thank you for your attention to this very important matter, and let’s all hope that PEACE can be accomplished AS SOON AS POSSIBLE!” he added. News broke on Tuesday that Ukraine had agreed to the peace plan, with some minor details left to be sorted out. BREAKING: Ukraine agrees to peace deal, with some details to still be worked out, US official says pic.twitter.com/pxFLvjftMW — Fox News (@FoxNews) November 25, 2025 Fox News provided further info: Lt. Col. Jeff Tolbert, a spokesman for U.S. Army Secretary Dan Driscoll, had told Fox News that Driscoll and his team met with Russian officials in Abu Dhabi on Monday and Tuesday to discuss the framework for a Ukraine peace deal. “The talks are going well and we remain optimistic. Secretary Driscoll is closely synchronized with the White House and the U.S. interagency as these talks progress,” said Tolbert. A U.S. official told Fox News that the Ukrainian delegation was also in Abu Dhabi and was in contact with Driscoll and his team. The diplomatic flurry over the weekend followed the leak of the 28-point peace plan to Axios, which many European leaders and U.S. lawmakers viewed as largely favorable to Russia. Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., said on X that the initial proposal by U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff was a “surrender document for Ukraine that would have left it at the mercy of Russia for decades to come.” He said the latest version, developed with Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s involvement and input from Ukrainian and European officials, was a better plan.

Kash Patel just sat down with Catherine Herridge and gave us a big update on the FBI “burn bags” that he discovered locked away in a highly confidential back room. The whole thing has always struck me as extremely odd…. The clip I’m about to show you clearly SEEMS to implicate Wray and Comey as the perpetrators, although Kash won’t come right out and say it, but the thing that’s odd to me about it is WHY do this? Don’t get me wrong, I don’t think any of these top-level Deep State people are above destroying evidence, but that’s not what was done here. This is like the worst of both worlds for them.  The records still exist just sitting around to be found by someone like Kash.  What’s the point of hiding them vs. just destroying them?  Not that I’m advocating for destruction of files, but I think if you believe they did this out of some faithful allegiance to the law, I think you are wildly naive. Catherine Herridge seems to have some of the same questions I do. This is a great 2 minute clip, watch here: FULL TRANSCRIPT: Let me ask you—when you learned about the discovery of the five burn bags, mm-hmm, here at FBI headquarters, what went through your head? Shock. Unbelievable shock that not just one director and his leadership team, but multiple, would have information that’s supposed to be secured—mm-hmm—some of it’s classified, but I mean, secured for purposes of record-keeping purposes, to keep up with federal statutory requirements, because that’s what we’re supposed to be doing. And instead, they were deposited in bags listed for destruction. So that was very disturbing. Just that in and of itself, putting aside whatever was in there. The burn bags were found in room 9582. Mm-hmm. That’s a secure facility. Um, I’m told by former agents that it would have some sort of access system, mm-hmm, or key card system. Does FBI leadership have a good idea who put the burn bags in that room? We do. You know for sure or you have a good universe—We know—of suspects? You know who put the burn bags there? What was the intent of the person who put the burn bags in room 9582? Was it to preserve them to be discovered later or to make sure they were destroyed? Well, that’s the an—those are the questions we are answering for the public and for this investigation, ’cause not only are we not in the business of not exonerating people, but we’re in the business of taking our investigative—mm-hmm—findings and working with Congress to say, “Look, even though we did not or—mm-hmm—did reach a legal conclusion on the matter, this is of such public importance in terms of the weaponization of government that happened,” who are people like President Trump were targeted, and including myself and more senators that we just revealed thanks to this FBI’s work in uncovering not just the burn bags, but other material related to Arctic Frost. Mm-hmm. What we want to do is find a public forum to display that information, and we believe that until our investigations conclude, we will be limited in what we can produce. It sounds to me like you know the answer to that question. I do. That’s what I thought. Okay. A highly classified CIA referral containing intelligence about the 2016 presidential election was also discovered here at FBI headquarters in a storage closet adjacent to the FBI director’s office. How many FBI personnel had access to that storage closet? That’s part of this ongoing investigation, and because we are working through that, I don’t want to disclose the number of folks or even who had access to it because that goes to your other question on who put it there and why did they—mm-hmm—put it there and were there any instructions associated with them depositing that material in these rooms? Am I correct? Based on my reporting, it is a very, very small universe of individuals who had access to that storage closet. Very small. Is it, in fact, only one? It’s very small. From Herridge on X: Listen very closely @FBIDirectorKash says “not just one (FBI) director and his leadership team, but multiple ” are implicated in the FBI ‘burn bag” record scandal. https://t.co/krPXjNwjlj — Catherine Herridge (@C__Herridge) November 25, 2025 RELATED REPORT: The Truth Behind All The “Burn Bags” Tulsi and Kash Keep Finding By now, I'm sure you've heard a lot over the past few months about how Kash Patel and Tulsi Gabbard keep finding these "burn bags" just loaded up with tons of documents incriminating the Deep State. First it was Kash Patel finding bags literally loaded with "smoking guns" incriminating major Deep State players in the Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax among other things: BREAKING: FBI Director Kash Patel Has Now Found “Thousands” Of Trump–Russia Collusion Hoax Documents In “Burn Bags” In A Secret Room Now this week Tulsi Gabbard came out and said she has more burn bags that seemingly confirm the 2020 election was rigged and stolen. Watch here: ? BREAKING: Tulsi Gabbard confirms she located documents in BURN BAGS related to CORRUPTION in the 2020 election Expose it ALL, @TulsiGabbard! ? "We are finding documents literally tucked away in the back of safes in random offices in these bags and in other areas which again… pic.twitter.com/yhSS35NRqQ — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) August 26, 2025 FULL TRANSCRIPT: And you also found many, uh, bags of information. I think they call them burn bags. They're supposed to be burned and they didn't get burned, having to do with how corrupt the 2020 election was and when will that all come out? Uh, Mr. President, I will be the first to brief you, uh, once we have that information collected. But you're right. We are finding documents literally tucked away in the back of safes in random offices, in these bags and in other areas, which again speaks to the intent of those who are trying to hide the truth from the American people and trying to cover up the politicization that was led by people like John Brennan and James Clapper and others that have caused really immeasurable harm to the American people and to our country. Great job. Thank you. We look forward to hearing it. The public looks forward. Thank you very much. So now the big question... How in the world is this possible? I'm not saying I don't trust Trump, Kash and Tulsi.  Of course I do.  This is the A-team and we've never seen anything like it. But I am saying that sometimes you have to do things a little unconventionally to wake up the masses. Because the normies have no idea any of this stuff is coming and some of them are not going to be able to handle it, the cognitive dissonance will literally shut their brains down. Which is why I believe the Trump Administration is doing everything they can to slowly leak these ideas out into the mainstream consciousness: Here we go Trump asks Tulsi when we can expect to see the shocking revelations about the 2020 election. To be clear, Trump knows the answer. He and Tulsi are not talking to each other, they are talking to us. 2020 is up next after Russiagate. pic.twitter.com/MgYap7VyNf — Clandestine (@WarClandestine) August 26, 2025 And I think that's where the burn bags come in. Look, the Deep State players at war with Trump over the last 10 years are not stupid people. Evil, sure. Rotten inside and out, sure. But stupid to the point that they would just leave bags upon bags at the CIA and FBI which in black and white essentially link them to treason and sign their death warrants? I'm sorry but I find that almost impossible to accept. I think what happened here is President Trump and his team caught all of this in realtime as it happened in 2015 ,2016, 2017 and then throughout the stolen 2020 election and likely even the efforts to steal the 2024 election, not to mention the two midterms we had intervening. I mean, he literally told us, quote: "I caught them all, no one else could have done it!" I told you at the time he was telegraphing that they had it all. But then you have to figure out a way to get the evidence back out, and it to it in a way that will not cause mass panic among the public. And that's what I think the burn bags story is all about. I wrote a lot more about it here: “I CAUGHT ‘EM ALL” — My Theory Is Being Proven True On A Near-Daily Basis Now! Tulsi Gabbard joined Glenn Beck this morning for a wide-ranging interview and I'm going to show that to you down below.... But one particular question really jumped out at me, and it's been something running through my head too. Glenn asked Tulsi how and why are all of these documents just now coming out in 2025 in the Second Trump Administration when it seems clear that most of them were generated in the 2015-2017 time frame and would have been readily accessible by Trump's First Administration. So why are we just now seeing and using them? It's a great question and something that has been bothering me as well. Tulsi gives her answer, which I think has a lot of merit, but I'm going to expand on that and add my speculation. You ready? My speculation and theory is what I've been telling you for the better part of ten years now... I have seen how calm, cool and collected President Trump has been for the last ten years, in the highs and in the lows.  And even at the lows, when he was facing four lawsuits and even prison time (remember his mugshot?) -- even then he looked unusually calm almost without a care in the world. How does that happen? I know he's a special person and built different than most of us, but he's not literally Superman.  He's still human. How does someone facing all of that, including the war waged on his family -- how does someone remain so calm at every step? I believe it's because from the earlier points in 2015/2016, Trump and the White Hats scooped up EVERYTHING! I told you back then, they've got it all. I believe they caught everything in realtime and immediately stored all the evidence in safe and secure locations. But that's not just my theory. That's not just Noah on the Internet letting his speculation run wild. No, President Trump told you literally point blank "I caught them all!" Remember this? I know many have seen this .. but many have not ..Everyone who think this is fake is in for the surprise of a lifetime ... Have Faith ..Breath easier..Smile more ..Because Trump caught them ALL .... W.H.G. pic.twitter.com/WB2aGgGI55 — Jack Straw (@JackStr42679640) October 5, 2024 Folks, this is not hard to figure out. President Trump and the White Hats caught them all, in real time, and they recorded and saved EVERYTHING. It's why for the last 10 years President Trump has looked and acted like a man already holding the Royal Flush -- because he is. He knows he has the proverbial "Trump Card" and "Trump Hand" and he's just been waiting to play it. He knew we had to get through four years of "The Pause" to show the country just how bad things can get so quickly. I believe he "caught them all" in 2016, in 2020, and again in 2024. I believe he won all three of those elections, but he let them stage the coup in 2020 to allow for The Pause. Why drag it out for so long? Because the Country could not have handled it in 2016. It would have looked like a Coup by Trump instead of the other way around. Heck, even in 2025 we still have stupid little "No Kings" rallies. There is still a large portion of the General Population that has believed all of these lies and they are going to be extremely hard to convince and wake up. The White Hats are trying. They're giving as much time as humanly possible, but soon the sword will need to fall and the dust will have to scatter where it will. That's my theory, and each day it becomes increasingly more clear that my theory has been 100% right. It's the "You are Watching a movie" theory -- and that doesn't mean every single moment of the last 10 years has been scripted. No, far from it. But a general arc and outline I believe was scripted and then micro-adjustments have been made on a daily basis to continue funneling reality into the desired outcome. Now I give you Tulsi Gabbard who explains her answer to that question. Watch here: FULL TRANSCRIPT: Glenn Beck: Hi, Tulsi. How are you?Tulsi Gabbard: I'm good.Glenn Beck: It's great to see you.Tulsi Gabbard: Good to see you.Glenn Beck: First of all, how's everything in Hawaii? We prayed for you and everybody in Hawaii.Tulsi Gabbard: Thank you so much. Thankfully, the tsunami passed without any real damage. I was talking to my folks and friends and family there late last night here on the East Coast and trying to help make sure everyone was prepared for the worst, which is what you have to do. It looked like it was going to be quite potentially damaging; they were looking at one‑ to three‑meter waves, essentially ten‑foot waves. Horrible. That, in any respect, is kind of a tough day in the ocean, but for a tsunami it would have been disastrous. Again, thankfully everyone is safe and there was minimal effect. Glenn Beck: Let's go into what has been released and what is still yet to come. As I look at the declassified documents of Russia‑gate, it confirms what many of us have already known. Are you surprised at the media not reporting any of this? We've known a lot of this, but now the media is silent on it and people seem to be deleting posts and no longer commenting online. What's happening?Tulsi Gabbard: I am not surprised that the mainstream media is refusing to cover this. If they do mention it, their approach is to try to diminish the effect and impact of the revelations we found in the documents that we declassified and released, or to give voice to detractors who dismiss it as bizarre or crazy. When you look at the coverage and the quotes the mainstream media is choosing to highlight, they're not addressing the very specific pieces of evidence we released that quote people like John Brennan, the CIA director, and James Clapper, Obama's director of national intelligence. They are not giving voice to the intelligence professionals who in these reports protested against the malicious actions Brennan and Clapper were taking at President Obama’s direction to create this intelligence assessment filled with falsehoods. They refuse to highlight these professionals because acknowledging them would push forward a very inconvenient truth: it exposes the media's complicity in pushing this lie and hoax from day one through President Trump's entire first administration. Glenn Beck: Brennan and Clapper have been the source on so many things, and they're in with the media. I wonder if this is just more of the same—somebody asks them if there’s anything to this and they say no, there's not. How many people are you surrounded by that are still part of that old system?Tulsi Gabbard: It's a good question. As we find these documents and go through them, declassifying and releasing them, we are learning more about who was directly involved and implicated. We're learning who may have been in the room and who was loudly protesting against it, recognizing how wrong it was. We have whistleblowers coming forward with documentation of their protests and their refusal to go along with this. There are people still working within the intelligence community who had a hand in this. As we identify them, we can ensure they and others like them, who were willing to weaponize intelligence to subvert the will of the American people, can no longer work in the intelligence community. Glenn Beck: Devin Nunes, Kash Patel—all these guys were there last time Trump was in. This was produced in the last administration. Why didn't this come out then?Tulsi Gabbard: It's an obvious question. I can't speak for all who were there, but I've asked some of these same questions. They were up against the deep state in many cases, people who refused to release these documents. If you remember, Mike Pompeo was President Trump's first CIA director, followed by Gina Haspel. I was told Haspel refused to release these documents. As more whistleblowers come forward, the story will continue to be told about what actually happened and why, here we are in 2025, we still need to shine a light on the truth. Documented evidence and proof matter because they show this wasn't a concoction; most importantly, they can drive accountability. Glenn Beck: Fox News had an exclusive saying Kash Patel found thousands of sensitive documents related to the origins of the Trump–Russia probe buried in multiple burn bags in secret rooms inside the bureau. What is a burn bag?Tulsi Gabbard: A burn bag is something you'll find in many offices throughout the intelligence community. If I have a highly classified document, I read it, review it, and when I'm done, my copy can go in the burn bag to ensure it doesn't end up in the wrong hands or get disclosed without authorization. It's very different if someone uses a burn bag to get rid of evidence that maybe exists only in one copy and then hides it in a secret room in the FBI. That's a tactic bad actors have used to get rid of evidence. Another tactic is over‑classifying information. This happened with the Steele dossier. It was already publicized as discredited, but Brennan and Clapper used it as a source for an intelligence assessment full of falsehoods. They didn't want anyone to know they used it, so they over‑classified it in a way that less than ten people could access it. Then they locked up the only hard copy documents; it didn't exist digitally. The document that exposed this was the one we released. They locked that document and the five copies in a safe. It had never been seen publicly, and many in government had not seen it until we released it. Glenn Beck: John Ratcliffe said there's more declassification coming that shows how deep this went. He said it’s stunning. Any idea on the timeline?Tulsi Gabbard: It's going through the declassification process now. I expect it to be released very soon. The document will speak for itself. It will confirm what many have known but will connect dots that haven't been revealed in public before. Glenn Beck: Are you sensing something? Mark Elias stopped posting on X, Brennan has lawyered up, John Kerry made his account private, Peter Strzok deleted his entire X history. Do they feel the walls are closing in? In my view that's the only way to read this; those who are truly innocent wouldn't take those actions.Tulsi Gabbard: Once again, this is why it's so important to declassify this information. Getting the truth out is essential. For anyone who is even mildly objective, it's irrefutable and undeniable. It can be used—and is being reviewed by the Department of Justice—to bring accountability for those involved. Glenn Beck: We were talking before we went on the air. I'm struggling with my job right now because at times it doesn't seem like it's worth it. It feels like it makes no difference because I don't know what I believe anymore. I don't know what's true. I can't sit on the air and talk about problems if there's no solution. It feels insane, doing the same thing over and over, beating your head against the wall and saying, "Here's proof, here's proof," and nothing happens. Do you sense that? Do the people around you understand how dangerous it is for the country if people no longer believe there’s justice on any front?Tulsi Gabbard: First, Glenn, let me tell you how important your voice is. I'm serious. I'm not patronizing. Your voice and voices like yours can reach and impact people from all political stripes, backgrounds, and walks of life across the country who aren't paying close attention. Your ability to communicate is the first challenge: explain why Americans should care about this at all. The implications of what we have exposed truly matter—not just for President Trump, Republicans, or Democrats, but for the integrity of our democratic republic and the tactics being used by the deep state to subvert the will of the American people. President Obama and his cohort were not happy that President Trump got elected. So, we need to make clear the implications for our republic. The second piece is accountability. Our system is set up the way it is by visionary founding fathers. We must fulfill our duty focused on the Constitution and provide a mechanism for accountability. Americans have always recognized the power of their voices. We need to call for necessary action to begin restoring that trust. Glenn Beck: Dan Bongino posted a cryptic message on X. He said what he found out at the FBI shocked him to the core. "We cannot run a republic like this and I'll never be the same after learning what I've learned." I'm not expecting you to answer for him, but have you felt that way when you've gotten in there?Tulsi Gabbard: I have seen up close the tactics used by those who care more for themselves—their ambition, job, influence, political interests, selfish self‑serving interests—than the Constitution. Every law enforcement and intelligence professional swears an oath just as I have, in uniform and in Congress, to support and defend the Constitution. That's why what we're doing matters. Yes, I have frustrations. But my resolve is focused and rooted in my love for our country and the principles it was founded upon. I feel the responsibility to do something about what we are revealing and experiencing firsthand. It's heavy, but it's an awesome responsibility, and I spend every day doing my best to fulfill it. Glenn Beck: We've talked before, and I've said you're in the second most dangerous job in the nation. President Trump has the most dangerous. You're working around people who do this kind of stuff for a living. We pray for your safety every night. I'm going to continue our conversation in a minute, but last night I did a TV show that's getting a lot of attention. It shows the connections to the radicals in the streets. I wondered, why hasn't Antifa been deemed a terrorist organization? Why are these guys not arrested? Why aren't we investigating them for terror? They're trying to change politics and policies through fear, intimidation, and violence. That's the definition of terror. We'll pick it up with Tulsi on that in just a second. Tulsi Gabbard: It's funny you mention that because I released several documents back in May that laid out the foundational strategy the Biden administration used in labeling groups and individuals as domestic violent extremists. If parents were angry or worried that their kids might be vaccinated at school without approval, they might be labeled extremists. We saw the radical traditionalist Catholics. The FBI under Obama did similar things. They also diminished Antifa under the Biden administration, downplaying the threat they posed to the safety and security of our communities. What you touched on is important: the ideology driving these groups who pose a direct threat to the fabric of our country and to American safety and security. Glenn Beck: They don't seem afraid of anything. They've never paid a price. Nobody even names them or says what they are. I talked to a guy in the world you live in now, and I asked if we can win this fight without naming it. He said we can, but not the way we're fighting. "They fight day and night. We fight sometimes during the day. We need to be nighttime fighters as well." I didn't ask what he meant. Do you agree?Tulsi Gabbard: I do. We need to be vigilant and clear‑eyed about the ideology driving people here who are directly working against the Constitution, the founding principles of our country, and the American way of life. There needs to be more focus on those chanting pro‑Hamas mantras and calls for intifada. Yes, some disturb the peace, but again it's the ideology driving these individuals that is dangerous. Glenn Beck: One last question on extremists. I see people celebrating violence, like the CEO of United Healthcare being shot—40 percent think it's great. If Pam Bondi actually charges these people, the press will say, "This is weaponization of government," and flip the script. Many will believe it because the media carries their water. How concerned are we about the reaction of the left in the streets with every move Donald Trump makes? Should that play a role in how we proceed?Tulsi Gabbard: We have to stand strong for the truth. We have to stand strong for justice, the Constitution, and freedom. Many of these bad actors frankly don't believe in those things. The mainstream media will do what it does. A positive here is that fewer people read or believe mainstream media. Their ratings are abysmal. There is a rise in audiences tuning into shows like yours, podcasts, and new media that represent real, authentic dialogue instead of filtered, agenda‑filled narratives. Glenn Beck: Tulsi, I'm glad we're friends. I'm glad I live in a time where someone like you can serve. You were a Democrat, you switched when you did, and you have always approached everything with the same attitude you approached your military oath. That gives me hope. Thank you for everything you've done.Tulsi Gabbard: I appreciate your friendship, Glenn. We must be filled with hope because God is love, and in God's love is where we find hope. In times like this, we lean on our faith in God's love, knowing that if we do our best to fulfill his will, things will work out as he has planned.Glenn Beck: Amen. Amen. Thank you, Tulsi. God bless.Tulsi Gabbard: Thank you. Glenn Beck: I really like her.Stu: Yeah, I do too. I don't agree with her on everything.Glenn Beck: Neither do I, but I like that you don't have to. She seems to take this seriously, cares about the country rather than herself, and takes her oath seriously. She could have gotten out of service, but she continues to serve honorably. She's a fighter but doesn't believe in war unless absolutely necessary. There aren't a lot of politicians like her.Stu: I wouldn't even put her in the category of a typical politician, though she served in Congress. She doesn't seem like that. She's as far away from a Nancy Pelosi‑type politician as you can get. Who would you take more seriously—her or Eric Swalwell? It's a tough one.Glenn Beck: It's a tough one. By the way, Trump was talking about Nancy Pelosi and insider trading yesterday. Here's Trump on Nancy Pelosi.Reporter: Senator Hawley introduced legislation that would ban members of Congress from owning or trading individual stocks. It extends to the president and vice president. Are you in favor of that legislation?Donald Trump: I like it conceptually. I don't know about it, but I like it conceptually. Nancy Pelosi became rich by having inside information. She made a fortune with her husband, and I think that's disgraceful. In that sense, I'd like it, but I'd have to study it carefully. This just happened, so I'll take a look at it. Conceptually, I like it. I think Nancy Pelosi should be investigated because she has the highest return of anybody in the history of Wall Street, save a few. How did that happen? She knows what's going to be announced. She buys stock, and then the stock goes up after the announcement. She ought to be investigated. Glenn Beck: Now Jake Tapper spoke with Nancy Pelosi yesterday. Here's what happened.Jake Tapper: Nancy Pelosi became rich—Nancy Pelosi: Why do you have to read that? We're here to talk about the 60th anniversary of Medicaid. That's what I agreed to talk about and what that means in the election.Jake Tapper: I wanted to give you a chance to respond. He accused you of insider trading. What's your response?Nancy Pelosi: That's ridiculous. I very much support stopping the trading of members of Congress. Not that I think anybody's doing anything wrong. If they are, they are prosecuted and go to jail. But stopping it instills confidence in the American people. I'm not into it; my husband is. It isn't anything to do with insider information. The president has his own exposure, so he's always projecting. And let's not give him any more time. We're going forward. I'm very proud of my family. While he makes fun of us, someone inspired by him broke into our home and hit my husband over the head. He thinks that's a riot. I'd rather not go into my complaints about him. I'd rather talk about the 60th anniversary.Glenn Beck: This is amazing. Nancy, you shouldn't use the word "riot" like that. Her husband is the greatest trader in Wall Street history—seriously impressive, almost clairvoyant.Stu: There are accounts that follow her trades. One replicates her trades and you beat the S&P 500. A few months ago, she bought options on an AI company and was up 330% in a month.Glenn Beck: Impressive. Over and over she calls these things.Stu: Her husband does. She's not even into it. She doesn't talk about it or know about it. She doesn't share anything with her husband. He's just a miracle investor.Glenn Beck: It's ridiculous. It's been legal for these people to do this. There's nothing illegal about it; that's why there's a bill. And to say he projects—it's projection.Stu: Kind of. Glenn Beck: Sydney Sweeney did an ad for American Eagle that got attention. Now Dunkin’ Donuts is into the genetics line in a new ad. Here's Dunkin’ Donuts: "Look, I didn't ask to be the king of summer. It just kind of happened. This tan, genetics. I just got my color analysis back. Guess what? Golden summer. Literally, I can't help it. Every time I drink a Dunkin’ Golden Hour refresher, the sun finds me. So, sipping these refreshers makes me the king of summer. Guilty as charged."I'm not interested. Where's the Sydney Sweeney ad? That was a much better ad. It's not the same; this is just a dude. It’s a weird ad.Stu: Is it a parody? Or is it a coincidence they both talk about genes?Glenn Beck: Maybe it's Dunkin’ Donuts. They couldn't afford a big‑idea ad man. "Here's an idea: we talk about genes." Their campaign for 20 years was "Time to make the donuts." Probably that guy's idea: show employees miserable, abused, without sleep making donuts for people who show up.Stu: You see it as an owner; I saw it as an employee. They never sleep.

A big shout out to my friend MJ for finding and posting this. I almost didn’t want to run it here because it’s so vile it literally makes me sick, but that’s not how we roll around here. We don’t let darkness lurk and grow in the dark…..we shine a big giant LIGHT on it. So that’s what we’re doing here. Meet “Pastor” Rebecca Todd Peters, proudly wearing not a church smock of any kind but one emblazoned with “Planned Parenthood” and standing at the pulpit saying things like this: “I felt God’s presence with me as I made the decision to end two pregnancies. And I felt no guilt, no shame, no sin.” YIKES. She also reportedly proudly published this online: Killing an unborn child because she’s a girl is a “moral good.” Killing an unborn boy because he has Down syndrome is “an act of love.” Killing an unborn baby just because you forgot to use birth control and don’t want to be a parent yet “is an act of grace,” “a blessing.” See it here: She also proudly dismisses Psalm 139 as “irrelevant to unborn life”. Wow. Watch this disgusting clip of sin on absolute unchained display: Backup here from my friend MJ: Pastor Rebecca Todd Peters: Killing babies in the womb is an Act of Love — “I felt God’s presence with me as I made the decision to end two pregnancies, and I felt no guilt, no shame, no sin” That wasn’t God you felt hun… that is satan. Killing an unborn child because she’s… pic.twitter.com/4SOxxRPwXF — MJTruthUltra (@MJTruthUltra) November 25, 2025 How absolutely disgusting. Your thoughts?

According to multiple reports, other House Republicans are considering resigning before the end of their term after Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s (R-GA) shock announcement last week. BREAKING: Marjorie Taylor Greene Is Stepping Down From Congress! "A few other GOP members messaged us over the weekend saying that they, too, are considering retiring in the middle of the term," Punchbowl News founder Jake Sherman said. According to Sherman, one House Republican said: “This entire White House team has treated ALL members like garbage. ALL. And Mike Johnson has let it happen because he wanted it to happen. That is the sentiment of nearly all — appropriators, authorizers, hawks, doves, rank and file. The arrogance of this White House team is off putting to members who are run roughshod and threatened. They don’t even allow little wins like announcing small grants or even responding from agencies. Not even the high profile, the regular rank and file random members are more upset than ever. Members know they are going into the minority after the midterms. “More explosive early resignations are coming. It’s a tinder box. Morale has never been lower. Mike Johnson will be stripped of his gavel and they will lose the majority before this term is out.” A few other GOP members messaged us over the weekend saying that they, too, are considering retiring in the middle of the term. Here’s one particularly exercised senior House Republican: “This entire White House team has treated ALL members like garbage. ALL. And Mike Johnson… https://t.co/QH2Ewwx5qv — Jake Sherman (@JakeSherman) November 24, 2025 "Fact check true but it’s worse than people inside the bubble know when you talk to real Americans outside the wicked snow globe of Washington DC. Myself and many of my colleagues came courageously roaring into 2025 with legislation that matched the 2024 electoral mandate only to be totally sidelined by Johnson under full obedience of the WH," Greene said. Fact check true but it’s worse than people inside the bubble know when you talk to real Americans outside the wicked snow globe of Washington DC. Myself and many of my colleagues came courageously roaring into 2025 with legislation that matched the 2024 electoral mandate only to… https://t.co/YV8L7gjRAJ — Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (@RepMTG) November 24, 2025 Full statement: Fact check true but it’s worse than people inside the bubble know when you talk to real Americans outside the wicked snow globe of Washington DC. Myself and many of my colleagues came courageously roaring into 2025 with legislation that matched the 2024 electoral mandate only to be totally sidelined by Johnson under full obedience of the WH. Executive orders are temporary, Q memes have not and obliterated the deep state, and my colleagues constantly trying to pass loyalty tests instead of demanding what is right won’t help Americans pay their rent or stop corporations from buying up homes, buy their groceries, provide good paying jobs and stop foreigners with visas from stealing their jobs, stop American tax dollars from funding foreign wars and causes, or rebuild the value of the dollar. Passing effective legislation that gets signed into law is permanent and actually solves Americans problems. Now that House members are switching gears into campaign mode and will be fighting for their lives, our legislative majority has been mostly wasted. Our best shot was the first 6-9 months. And when Republicans likely lose the midterms it will become total and complete political war and gridlock once again. The Uniparty always wins no matter which way the political pendulum swings leaving the American people empty handed. What is the convincing message for 2026 and likely 2028? It will be the American people asking candidates, “what tangible thing have you done for me and how did it or will it make my life better?” And then actually trying to get them to vote after both parties have failed them. Serious changes are needed and words are unconvincing. "Sherman's reporting is accurate. I've spoken with several people about this myself," Rich Baris commented. "The people who told the President that these fights with Massie and MTG were wise—because they will make a ton of money off of them—have put the President in serious political danger," he continued. "Most members are NOT America First and have always been waiting for an opportunity to betray him. There are several more seriously considering resignations and the House Majority could be gone before the midterms," he added. Sherman's reporting is accurate. I've spoken with several people about this myself. The people who told the President that these fights with Massie and MTG were wise—because they will make a ton of money off of them—have put the President in serious political danger. Most… https://t.co/sjt3juQuGf — Rich Baris The People's Pundit (@Peoples_Pundit) November 24, 2025 Newsweek shared more: The GOP have a slim majority in Congress with 219 seats to the Democrats 213. If they lose just a handful of other colleagues, it will make it more difficult for Trump to push through his agenda. This in turn could make Republicans lose confidence in the Trump administration and affect the GOP's performance at the 2026 midterms. Neither Greene nor Punchbowl News specified which Republican figures may also resign from Congress. Newsweek reached out to representatives for Greene by email to comment on this story outside of normal business hours. Meanwhile, other Republicans are attempting to ease concerns about the possibility of additional GOP congressional resignations. It’s about the math. The consequences of GOP GA Rep Greene retiring and the Republican majority in the House https://t.co/sSKT6CsM4m — Chad Pergram (@ChadPergram) November 24, 2025 Fox News explained: Rep. Mike Haridopolos, R-Fla., told Fox News Digital he’s "heard rumors" of frustration among his colleagues but, from people he’s spoken with, "They’re committed to being here." "This is an incredible honor to serve in the House of Representatives, and when you run for office, I think you should fill out your term," Haridopolos said. "This is what the American public wanted," he continued. "I mean, they affirmatively put Republicans in power. And the only frustration we've been through, at least my biggest frustration, is when the Democrats exercise their power to shut the government down for 43 days." Greene, in her resignation letter teeing up her departure from Congress Jan. 5, 2026, aired grievances about how little progress has been made on Capitol Hill since she became a lawmaker in 2021. She also took aim at President Donald Trump, who she has for weeks been distancing herself from despite being a die-hard Trump loyalist for much of her legislative career, and at Johnson for his handling of the shutdown. "During the longest shutdown in our nation's history, I raged against my own speaker and my own party for refusing to proactively work diligently to pass a plan to save American healthcare and protect Americans from outrageous overpriced and unaffordable health insurance policies," Greene said. "The House should have been in session working every day to fix this disaster, but instead America was forced fed disgusting political drama once again from both sides of the aisle." Rep. Blake Moore, R-Utah, the fifth highest-ranking House Republican, sought to quash any rumors of dissent among the ranks in a statement to Fox News Digital.

I did not expect to see this today, but I appreciate it! Bill Maher had Lara Trump on his show this week and at one point he stopped the show to explain why he stopped taking cheap shots at President Trump. It’s really easy to dehumanize someone you’ve never met, but after that White House dinner, Bill has been singing a new tune about President Trump. Sure, they’re not suddenly best buddies and Bill is not suddenly MAGA, but he’s adopting a reasonable approach at this point that I think can be respected.  Maybe not praised, but respected. Watch here” Full show: RELATED REPORT: WATCH: Bill Maher Gives Stunning Praise of President Trump It just happened again... Bill Maher once again told the truth about President Trump and once again when he gave a rational, honest evaluation the truth ended up being a real compliment to President Trump. Watch here: WOW: Bill Maher just gave Trump some MASSIVE concessions on what he’s doing right. This wasn’t the usual snark from Maher. He admitted Trump wasn’t wrong on tariffs, or on forcing NATO to pay their fair share of defense budgets. Then Maher pivoted to something much deeper:… pic.twitter.com/Yqqr02Q11J — Vigilant Fox ? (@VigilantFox) August 16, 2025 TRANSCRIPT: Look, I'll say this for Trump. Um, he's got this idea that America is still the biggest swinging dick in the world, and we have not used our power as much as we should. That's what the tariffs were about. We have the power to change these people's, other nation's, trading practices with us—some of which were out of line. I'm surprised that people went along with it as much as they did, so he wasn't completely wrong about that. He said, "Look, NATO hasn't been paying their fair share. I'm gonna make them do that." He wasn't wrong about that. And I'll tell you this, one thing about him that I know—not gonna tell you how I know, but a lot of people have seen the same thing—he really does hate war. He really does not like it when people die in war. I love how you can hear the crowd nervously waiting for Bill to burn Trump so they can have some stupid laugh, and then it never comes. He just tells the honest truth. Of course it was only a couple months ago that this happened: Bill Maher Reveals How His Perception of President Trump Changed After Eating Dinner With Him: “My Mind Was Blown” Bill Maher Reveals The Truth About His Dinner With Trump: “A crazy person doesn’t live in the White House” A couple weeks ago, Bill Maher joined President Trump, Kid Rock and Dana White for a personal dinner at the White House. Since then, everyone has been dying to know what Maher will say. Not because we think he's some sort of oracle worth following, but just because it's interesting. How did it go? Were any of your preconceived notions proven wrong? Spoiler alert: Yes!  In a big way! I don't watch Bill's show and I generally don't find him all that funny or amusing, but I found this absolutely fascinating. Credit to Bill Maher for telling the truth and admitting that the man he met in person is nothing like the image he had of him in his mind. And I think that's the most fascinating point, and something the entire country needs to experience. For 10+ years now, the MSM has lied to you. They have told you "orange man bad!" over and over and over. They even flat out lie and distort video footage to make it seem like President Trump said things he didn't say. Anyone remember the "very fine people" hoax? If you've never actually seen this raw footage before, this is stunning. Check out the video below, and on the left you'll see the MSM lies about President Trump and then played side-by-side you'll see the actual footage and what President Trump actually said. The truth is that the media flat out lied and said Trump said something he didn't say.  He actually said the exact opposite of what they claimed he said. And they repeated that lie over and over and over.  Because if you repeat a lie often enough, people will start to believe it. Watch here: Jake Tapper and the Fine People Hoax. For years Jake spread this divisive lie, always conveniently cutting off the video before Trump says that he is not talking about neo-nazis or white supremacists. Fake, corrupt media have poisoned this country. Truth is the antidote. pic.twitter.com/WXwhNxn0SB — MAZE (@mazemoore) October 27, 2024 TRANSCRIPT: Jake TapperYou have it?Okay, I'm being told we have it. Thank you. Run it, please. President TrumpExcuse me. To protest.And you had some very bad people in that group,but you also had people that were very fine people on both sides. Jake TapperThat was President Trump saying that very fine peoplewere marching alongside neo-Nazis and skinheads and white supremacists. President TrumpI've condemned neo-Nazis.I've condemned many different groups.But not all of those people were neo-Nazis, believe me.Not all of those people were white supremacists. And you had people—and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists,because they should be condemned totally.But you had many people in that groupother than neo-Nazis and white nationalists, okay? Jake TapperThis is a president who said there were, quote,"very fine people on both sides"in a Charlottesville neo-Nazi, Klan march in Charlottesville—and his infamous reference to "very fine people." There were, quote,"very fine people on both sides" of that Charlottesville, Virginia march. And candidate Trump—I tried to get him three times to condemn David Duke.He wouldn't do it. President TrumpWell, you've got David Duke just joined.A bigot. A racist. A problem.I mean, this is not exactly the people you want in your party. Jake TapperA lot of people think that he has a soft spot in his heart for,or at least won't condemn, white supremacists. President TrumpAs I said on Saturday,we condemn in the strongest possible termsthis egregious display of hatred, bigotry, and violence.It has no place in America. Racism is evil.And those who cause violence in its name are criminals and thugs—including the KKK, neo-Nazis, white supremacists,and other hate groups that are repugnant to everything we hold dear as Americans. We are a nation founded on the truththat all of us are created equal. Jake TapperAnd there's this big effort by Trump supportersto pretend that the president didn't say what he said—to call this all a hoax. President TrumpAnd you had people—and I'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists,because they should be condemned totally. But you had many people in that groupother than neo-Nazis and white nationalists. Backup here with captions added if you prefer: The "very fine people" hoax EXPOSED! pic.twitter.com/rRfRh23ip7 — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) April 12, 2025 And that, folks, is exactly what Bill Maher is waking up to. For years, Bill drank the MSM kool-aid. Orange man bad! He called White Supremacists "very fine people"! What a terrible person! Except....none of it was true. And when Bill Maher finally meets President Trump in person he's stunned that the man is so different than the public persona of him. Come on Bill, you're a smart guy....what's the reason for that?  What's the only difference? The only difference Bill, is that you met him face-to-face with no MSM twisting the facts and telling you what to believe and feeding you a distorted version of reality. It's amazing what happens when you remove the lying MSM and you just take Trump at face value...almost everyone says "what's not to like about this guy?" It's why for over 10+ years, whenever I run into someone who hates Trump and all they can say is "orange man bad" I ask them one simple question: Have you ever actually watched a Rally speech before or attended one?  I mean the full thing, raw feed, not CNN's interpretation of it or small little clips, I mean the full thing. Almost always the answer is no. And in the rare times I can convince them to watch one, they almost always have the same exact experience as Bill Maher. Anyway, I thought this was excellent. Thank you Bill for telling the truth. We don't expect you to suddenly start wearing the MAGA hat, all we wanted was just the truth and you delivered on that. Watch here: Twelve days ago, I had dinner with President Trump, a dinner that my friend @KidRock set up because we share the belief that there has to be something better than hurling insults from 3000 miles away. pic.twitter.com/KE2t2eyBkI — Bill Maher (@billmaher) April 12, 2025 FULL TRANSCRIPT: Bill Maher And now, for what I know you've all been waiting for, I'd like to give you my book report on my visit to the White House. Okay, as you know, 12 days ago I had dinner with President Trump—a dinner that was set up by my friend Kid Rock—because we share a belief that there's got to be something better than hurling insults from three thousand miles away. And let me first say that to all the people who treated this like it was some kind of summit meeting—you're ridiculous. Like I was going to sign a treaty or something. I have power—I'm a fucking comedian—and he's the most powerful leader in the world. I'm not the leader of anything except maybe a contingent of centrist-minded people who think there's got to be a better way of running this country than hating each other every minute. So thank you. So okay, so meet up in person—maybe it'll be different. Spoiler alert: it was. First good sign, before I left for the Capitol, I had my staff collect and print out this list of almost 60 different insulting epithets that the president has said about me. Things like: stupid, dummy, low-life dummy, sleazebag, sick, sad, stone-cold crazy, fired like a dog, his show is dead, the sixth year... I brought this to the White House because I wanted him to sign it. Which he did. Which he did with good humor. And I know, as I say that, millions of liberal sphincters just tightened... "Oh my God, Bill, are you gonna say something nice about him?" What I'm gonna do is report exactly what happened. You decide what you think about it. And if that's not enough pure Trump hate for you—I don't give a fuck. So no, I didn't go MAGA. And to the president's credit, there was no pressure to. After we left the Oval Office, he showed me the little room off the office—you know, the one where Clinton used to... Okay, the blowjob room, okay? Well, not anymore. That’s where they keep the merch now. And he gave me a bunch of hats—but he didn't ask me to take a picture in one, which I appreciated. The guy I met is not the person who, the night before the dinner, shit-tweeted a bunch of nasty crap about how he thought this dinner was a bad idea and what a deranged asshole I was. I read it and thought, oh, what a lovely way to welcome someone to your house. But when I got there—that guy wasn't living there. Now, does Trump want respect? Of course. Who doesn't? My friend said to me, "What are you gonna wear to the White House?" I said, "I don't know, but I'm not gonna dress like Zelensky, I’ll tell you that." Just for starters—he laughs. I'd never seen him laugh in public, but he does—including at himself. And it's not fake. Believe me, as a comedian of 40 years, I know a fake laugh when I hear it. And I thank you for that. Okay, example: In the Oval Office, he was showing me the portraits of presidents and he pointed to Reagan and said, in all seriousness, “You know the best thing about him? His hair.” I said, “Well, there was also that whole bringing down communism thing.” Waiting for the button next to the Diet Coke button to get pushed and I go through the trap door. But no, he laughed. He got it. I said to him at one point, “Mr. President, you know the dog? That’s unusual in the White House.” He said, “Well, a lot of the presidents, they had a dog for political reasons.” I said, “No. People love dogs. That's what that is.” “Oh yeah. Okay. That’s true.” At one point we were walking through his—amazing, it is an amazing—tour of the whole house. And I don’t remember exactly what we were talking about, but it must have been something with the 2020 election, because I know he used the word “lost,” and I distinctly remember saying, “Wow, I never thought I'd hear you say that.” He didn’t get mad. He's much more self-aware than he lets on in public. Look, I get it. It doesn’t matter who he is at a private dinner with a comedian. It matters who he is on the world stage. I'm just taking it as a positive that this person exists—because everything I’ve ever not liked about him was—I swear to God—absent, at least on this night, with this guy. Bob, Kid Rock, told me the night before—he said, “If you want to get a word in edgewise, you're going to have to cut him off. He'll just go on.” Not at all. I've had so many conversations with prominent people who are much less connected—people who don't look you in the eye, people who don’t really listen because they just want to get to their next thing, people whose response to things you say just doesn’t track. Like, what? None of that with him. And he mostly steered the conversation to “What do you think about this?” I know your mind is blown. So is mine. There were so many moments when I hit him with a joke or contradicted something—and no problem. At dinner, he was asking me about the nuclear situation in Iran in a very genuine, “Hey, I think you're a smart guy, I want your opinion” sort of way. And I said, “Well, obviously you're privy to things about it and I'm not. But for what it’s worth, I thought the Obama deal was worth letting play out because we made Iran destroy 98 percent of the uranium, and they were 15 years away from a bomb.” And then I said to him, “But we got rid of that. You got rid of that.” He didn’t get mad or call me a left-wing lunatic. He took it in. I told him I thought parts of his plan for Gaza were wacky, but that I had supported him in the idea that Gaza could be Dubai instead of hell. I told him he was wrong when he tweeted the night before that I was critical of all things Trump. Not true. Check the tapes. Moving Israel's embassy to Jerusalem? Loved it. The border did need to be controlled. I'm glad the cops are getting their morale back. DEI had gone too far. Biological men shouldn’t be playing women’s sports. Europe should pay for their defense. And of course it makes sense that Arab countries should take in Arab refugees—like the million Syrians who wound up in Germany when Saudi Arabia took none. He said to me, “You're right, they took none.” I said, “Well, you should remind your boyfriend in Saudi Arabia that the next time you see him.” He laughed. I never felt I had to walk on eggshells around him. And honestly, I voted for Clinton and Obama, but I would never feel comfortable talking to them the way I was able to talk with Donald Trump. That’s just how it went down. Make of it what you will. Me, I feel it’s emblematic of why the Democrats are so unpopular these days. He was even okay when I checked him on the orangutan. Lost it, you know? He said to Dana White, “You know, Bill said my father was an orangutan and I really love my father.” And I said, “Well, Mr. President, I did that because I didn’t like what you were doing regarding Obama’s birth origins. I thought that was low.” Again, no anger. Just a little smile, as if to say, “Yeah, I get it.” The most surreal part of the whole night was when I got home. I flew back right after the dinner and I'm in bed watching 60 Minutes from the night before. And there's Trump in one of their stories, standing at a podium in a room that looked to me like one of the rooms and places we’d just been in. And he's ranting—“Disgusting! You're a terrible person!” And I'm like... who’s that guy? What happened to Glinda the Good Witch? And why can’t we get the guy I met to be the public guy? And I’m not saying it’s our responsibility to do that. It’s not. I’m just reporting exactly what I saw over two and a half hours. I went into the mine—and that’s what’s down there. A crazy person doesn’t live in the White House. A person who plays a crazy person on TV a lot lives there. Which I know is fucked up. It’s just not as fucked up as I thought it was. And I have no illusions, now that I’m back to work at my job, that he might start a new list. But I also think he now understands I have a job to do—or at least he did on this night—because he said to me early on that he’d seen our last episode, which was the Friday before this dinner. And he said, “I thought maybe you'd be nice, but you hit me really hard.” “Oh, I did. Because I’m not going to pull my punches that presidents get to propose a third term for themselves.” He understood that—and without animus. That doesn’t mean he’s not going to try to do it... At one point I said to him, “You’re scaring people. Do you really want to be scaring your own citizens so much?” And I know now you're all saying, “And what did he say to that?” Honestly—I don't remember. But it wasn’t, “Okay, I’ll stop.” So MAGA fans, don’t worry. Your boy gave me nothing. Just hats. Hats, and a very generous amount of time and a willingness to listen and accept me as a possible friend—even though I’m not MAGA. Which was the point of the dinner. My favorite part of the whole night was—we were standing in the blowjob room... And he said, “You know, I’ve heard from a lot of people who really like that we’re having this dinner. Not all, but a lot.” And I said, “Same. A lot of people told me they loved it—but not all.” And we agreed. The people who don’t even want us to talk—we don’t like you. “Don’t talk,” as opposed to what? Writing the same editorial for the 1,000,000th time and making 25-hour speeches into the wind? Really, that’s what liberals have? He takes the piss out of everybody else—and we can hold ours. Okay, that’s my report. You can hate me for it, but I’m not a liar. Trump was gracious and measured—and why he isn’t that in other settings, I don’t know, and I can’t answer, and it’s not my place to answer. I’m just telling you what I saw. And I wasn’t high. Damn. Missed. Backup video here with captions added if you prefer: Bill Maher Reveals The Truth About His Dinner With Trump: "A crazy person doesn't live in the White House" pic.twitter.com/GqgoYaY4IN — Noah Christopher (@DailyNoahNews) April 12, 2025 And I'll wrap up with Kid Rock's opinion of the dinner too in case you haven't seen that: UPDATE: Kid Rock Says “Weirdly Awesome” Dinner With Trump and Bill Maher Went “So Well”! Kid Rock Plays Iconic Steinway Grand Piano At The White House Kid Rock Tells The BEST Trump Story You Will Ever Hear

The world’s strongest woman… wasn’t a woman at all—at least not according to furious officials who say the newly crowned champion concealed a male birth and blindsided the entire sport. American competitor Jammie Booker, who defeated [...] The post World’s Strongest Woman Stripped of Title After Officials Uncover Secret Transgender Status appeared first on The People's Voice.

He too it way too far.

The official Strongman Games World Championship has disqualified 28-year-old Philadelphia-based athlete Jammie Booker, stripping Booker of the "Women’s Open title" he won over the weekend, after organizers discovered that he is biologically male.

New and creative ways to embarrass the species to which we all belong. The post Jeffrey Epstein: Democrat Character Witness? appeared first on Frontpage Mag.