Owning a pet is a huge responsibility. And while many prospective dog owners, especially first-time owners, think they understand the depth of this commitment, it is often difficult for them to foresee the full range of such responsibility. We believe that as dog owners, whether seasoned or new, being responsible for the overall well-being of a dog should be the forefront of every decision you make moving forward. And responsible dog ownership doesn’t start when you get a dog. Making an informed decision and preparing yourself for the commitment that’s about to come is where it truly begins. Southworks / Shutterstock.com And that’s why in honor of Responsible Dog Ownership Month, we’re here to help you make an informed decision on where and how to get a dog. This is also a great opportunity to help your reflect on what it truly means to provide a happy, healthy, and safe environment for your dog, especially for first-time dog owners. If you’ve finally made the decision to add a furry friend to your family and into your home, now it’s time to determine what route to take – buying or adopting? This is one of the biggest dilemma for many prospective dog owners. And making a decision between these options isn’t easy. So, in this article, we’ll discuss both options of buying and adopting dogs so you can consider all factors for an informed and responsible decision. Knowing The Difference Between Buying And Adopting Dogs The first step to making a decision between buying and adopting dogs is to know their main differences. Below, we’ll discuss just that. Buying Dogs hedgehog94 / Shutterstock.com Buying dogs mean purchasing a dog from a reputable breeder, at pet stores, and/or online. Many people who buy dogs are often those who want a puppy, and/or have their hearts set on specific characteristics such as breed, age, color, size, temperament, or pedigree, which can be difficult to find at a shelter. Buying can be more expensive, since people who prefer to buy a dog want to own a specific breed of dog, which leads to buying one from a breeder, at the pet store, or online. Additionally, purebred dogs or dogs from highly reputable breeders can be quite expensive. And then reputable breeders also charge additional fees, on top of the purchase price, for vaccinations, health checks, microchipping, spaying/neutering, and many more. Furthermore, buying a dog is more time-consuming, because you need to thoroughly do your own extensive research about the breed and find a responsible, and ethical breeder where you’re getting the dog from. Adopting Dogs hedgehog94 / Shutterstock.com Adopting dogs mean taking in a dog from an animal shelter, rescue organization, or even directly from a previous owner. These dogs are usually stray, abandoned dogs or dogs that need rehoming. Unlike buying, adopting dogs involve a process that is focused on finding the most suitable home and owner for a dog. So, when you adopt a dog, the organization or person where you’re adopting from will need to evaluate your lifestyle and also your ability to provide and take care of the pooch. Adopting is not as expensive as buying. Because the adoption fee usually includes essential services such initial medical care, vaccinations, spaying/neutering, etc. Furthermore, you might not have to do as much research as compared to when you buy a dog. Usually, shelters and rescue organizations have assessments of their dogs’ behavior and temperament. So, you have a generally good idea of what you’re getting into. Pros & Cons: Buying vs. Adopting Dogs Buying and adopting dogs have their own pros and cons. And making sure to reflect on these will help you make a choice the properly aligns with your lifestyle and your personal and ethical values. Buying Dogs David Tadevosian / Shutterstock.com Are you leaning more towards the option to buy a dog? Use the following pros and cons to help you become more confident in your choice or give you insight into why adopting dogs might be better suited for you. Adopting Dogs David Tadevosian / Shutterstock.com Have you decided that adopting dogs is something that speaks to you a lot better than buying dogs? Well, here are pros and cons to help you seal the deal. Buying vs. Adopting: Which Is The Better Option? Evgenii Bakhchev / Shutterstock.com While buying dogs can provide you with a cute puppy, all the breed-specific characteristics you’re looking for, early training, it is a responsible dog owner’s responsibility to come to a conclusion with careful consideration of not only your lifestyle, but of larger issues such as the impact on animal welfare and other ethical concerns. On the flip side, adopting dogs is not only compassionate but also an ethical choice. It saves lives, reduces costs, and positively contribute to animal welfare organizations. However, it still does come with its own challenges. While both buying and adopting dogs have their own pros and cons, prospective dog owners should do their due diligence before choosing any of the options presented. Furthermore, we want to encourage prospective dog owners to seriously weigh in both options with the primary focus being responsible dog ownership. Because at the end of the day, whether a dog is purebred or mixed breed, a dog’s overall well-being should be at the center of your decision-making process. Conclusion amfroey / Shutterstock.com Making a well-informed decision will not only positively affect you, but will also positively contribute to the dog’s welfare and the pet community as a whole. As a prospective owner, knowing the weight of the decision to own a dog is important. Do your own research, reflect, and make a choice that truly aligns with your values and lifestyle. And whether you choose to buy or adopt, we want to, yet again, remind that responsible dog ownership should be paramount.

Vivek Going to Springfield

Ivy League Schools Face New Lawsuits Over Affirmative Action

The witness Democrats invited to testify for Wednesday's House Homeland Security Committee hearing on the border crisis said that racism is the major driver behind legislation and ideas for better security at the southern border.Santa Cruz County Sheriff David Hathaway downplayed the overall crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border because his county in Arizona is safe. Nogales, Arizona, which is part of Santa Cruz County, does have a border wall."The vast majority of people coming to the U.S. are coming to work. It is disingenuous to conflate people coming to work with drug dealers or criminals. They come to improve their lives," Hathaway wrote for his testimony."And certain policies smack of racism. For example, a wall was never suggested for the Canadian-U.S. border. Title 42, a COVID policy, was never implemented aggressively at the Northern border to keep foreigners from making claims. And it is odd to me that it has become fashionable to talk of walls, tariffs, and isolationism. Reagan was not a fan of walls. When the Soviet Union suggested that they were embracing freedom in the late 1980’s and early 1990’s, Reagan told them to prove it by tearing down the Berlin Wall," Hathaway continued.Hathaway's apples-to-oranges comparison about the border wall being constructed along the southwest border was heavily criticized by Republicans on the committee.Rep. Eli Crane, who is from Arizona, asked Hathaway which border experiences more illegal immigration."Probably the southern border," Hathaway reluctantly answered."Yeah, you know it is," Crane shot back."It's not about race with the American people. Matter of fact, most American people support legal immigration. It's the illegal immigration, it has nothing to do with race," Crane also noted.Crane also got Hathaway to admit that while he keeps his doors closed at home, he leaves the door unlocked. — (@) Nogales, Arizona, which is part of Santa Cruz County, does have a border wall that extends beyond the port of entry.Hathaway further said he did not know what Tren de Aragua is despite the Venezuelan gang having a foothold within the country and committing high-profile crimes under the Biden-Harris administration.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Fourteen Republicans voted Wednesday with Democrats of the U.S. House of Representatives to defeat a bill meant to fund the government and avoid a shutdown at the end of the month. The funding measure failed by a vote of 220 to 202. 'The play that we ran tonight was the right play. ... I'm very disappointed that it didn't pass.' Three Democrats crossed the aisle and voted with Republicans in favor of the bill. Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana had tied an election integrity bill to the funding legislation in an attempt to pressure Democrats to pass it all at once. "It is members across the conference who share the same concern that we do about this," said Johnson about the SAVE Act earlier in September. "And we believe it’s one of the — perhaps the most urgent issue, the most imminent threat facing the country, is the integrity of this election cycle.”After the bill failed Wednesday, Johnson spoke to reporters. "The play that we ran tonight was the right play. It's the right play for the American people. It's the one they demand and deserve," he said. "We have two very important objectives right now," he continued. "Congress has an obligation to fund the government. Congress has an obligation to ensure that our elections are secure, fair and free. This vote tonight could have accomplished both. I'm very disappointed that it didn't pass."Earlier in the day, former President Donald Trump demanded that Republicans refuse to fund the government without passing the voter integrity bill."If Republicans don’t get the SAVE Act, and every ounce of it, they should not agree to a Continuing Resolution in any way, shape, or form," he wrote on Truth Social. "A Vote must happen BEFORE the Election, not AFTER the Election when it is too late. BE SMART, REPUBLICANS..."The election bill would require proof of citizenship before voting, but Democrats claim election fraud is already illegal and the new law would only prevent legal voters from turning in their ballot. "In reality, the SAVE Act would make it harder for millions of legal citizens to register to vote," read a statement from Rep. Mike Quigley of Illinois. "Americans would not be able to use military IDs or Tribal IDs alone when registering to vote. People who have changed their names, including millions of married women, would not be allowed to use their birth certificates when proving their citizenship."The government will shut down in 13 days on Oct. 1 unless legislators can agree on a funding bill. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The print has been confirmed as Albrecht Dürer's Knight, Death and the Devil (1513). Now, this rare find is headed to auction, where it could fetch tens of thousands of dollars. The post An 11-Year-Old Boy Rescued An Engraving From A Dump — And It Turned Out To Be A Rare Renaissance Print appeared first on All That's Interesting.

Harris, Pelosi, Warren Spread Misinformation About 'Trump Abortion Ban'

Survey: Seventeen Percent Say Trump Should Have Been Shot and Killed Sunday

In a letter to Vice President Kamala Harris Wednesday, nine Senate Republicans criticized her performance in leading the Biden administration's efforts to expand broadband access in the country, Politico reported.

Lawmakers rejected a Republican government funding plan Wednesday amid divisions within the party, with former president Donald Trump calling for a forced shutdown unless certain demands are met.With government funding set to expire at the end of September, the bill was...