Golgoroth is an Orge Hive boss featured in the third encounter in the King’s Fall Raid and now he’s the first boss you face in Destiny 2’s Pantheon Raid boss rush mode. If you’ve never cleared King’s Fall and need help knowing how to take down Golgoroth in Destiny 2 Pantheon‚ I’ve got you covered. How to prepare for Golgoroth in Destiny 2 Pantheon While Golgoroth is one of the easier Raid bosses‚ which is why he’s the first Pantheon boss‚ he’s difficult if you don’t know what you’re doing. I highly recommend using one of the best Pantheon builds as your base. I also recommend communicating verbally with your Fireteam since there are teams you need to form and timers you need to watch out for. Make sure you have strong DPS weapons — some of the Onslaught weapons like Edge Transit and Falling Guillotine are great for this. Rocket Launchers‚ Linear Fusion Rifles‚ and Snipers are the best options for dealing damage to G...

Manor Lords is all about resource management and settlement sustainability. You really can’t survive without having the necessary materials to support your growing families. Circumstances can be hard at times‚ and there may be moments when you struggle to stay afloat. So let’s build on and figure out how to restore resources and preserve supplies in Manor Lords. Manor Lords — How to restore resources Screenshot: PC Invasion When you’re just starting out in Manor Lords‚ your first task will most likely be to increase your population. This is just as important as anything else and is an essential building block to creating a thriving settlement. However‚ for every new family that joins your town‚ the more food and resources you’ll have to produce. Supplies in Manor Lords consist of Food and Fuel‚ both of which are consumed by 1 every month‚ and double in the winter. So the more your population increases‚ you’ll need to up your production. You...

Destiny 2 Pantheon is‚ sadly‚ a limited-time game mode that puts you and your Fireteam up against a series of Raid bosses. These are the hardest bosses in the game‚ and you’re fighting them back to back‚ so you’ll need the best Warlock‚ Titan‚ and Hunter Destiny 2 builds to clear Pantheon. How to make an OP build for Pantheon in Destiny 2 The key to winning Pantheon in Destiny 2 is to follow the same principles you need to create a great Grandmaster Nightfall build or Dungeon/Raid build. You need a solid DPS build with good survivability and strong add-clear weapons. Before we dive into each build‚ here are the weapons and subclass verbs I recommend you focus your Pantheon build around: Legendary Weapons Sword‚ Linear Fusion Rifle‚ Rocket Launcher for damage phases Anything with Voltshot‚ Firefly‚ Dragonfly‚ Incandescent‚ Kinetic Tremors‚ Destabilizing Rounds‚ or Hatchling for add-clear Exotic Weapons Tractor Cannon‚ Gjallarhorn‚ Divinity‚ Lament‚ Whispe...

Since Update 2 in Project Mugetsu‚ you can become Fullbringer‚ or Fullbring‚ as the game puts it. This is one of four races you can choose from‚ so if you’re sure to want to become a Fullbring‚ then let’s get started. Becoming a Fullbring in Project Mugetsu To start the quest to become a Fullbring in Project Mugetsu‚ you must speak to Samook. This NPC can be tracked from the Fullbring icon. Both Samook and the Fullbring icon is show below. He isn’t too far away‚ just across the bridge from where you spawn in. Screenshot: PC Invasion Upon speaking to him‚ he’ll want to see your potential. This is done through killing four human players. Don’t leave the game or server hop whilst you have this objective‚ as it will reset‚ and you’ll have to talk to him again. Note that you can’t kill the same player twice in a row. It will count if you kill a player a second time‚ provided you’ve killed another player in between. Once you...

Monday may have been Education Secretary Miguel Cordona’s terrible‚ horrible‚ no good‚ very bad day. The ink was barely dry on the Education Department’s vast rewrite of Title IX before three separate federal lawsuits were filed in quick succession in courthouses in Louisiana‚ Texas‚ and Alabama. The essential elements of each lawsuit share a common theme: The Biden administration’s new Title IX rule is illegal. Title IX of the Education Amendments Act of 1972 is a single sentence. It simply bars sex discrimination in any federally funded education program. It doesn’t matter how much federal funding a school or institution of higher education receives. And it doesn’t matter whether such funding from the federal government is direct or indirect. So yes‚ even the vast majority of private schools must comply with the new rule.    But this simple‚ longstanding prohibition on sex discrimination has been manipulated by the Biden administration to undermine constitutional freedoms (including the freedom of speech)‚ eliminate commonsense due process protections for students accused of sexual misconduct‚ and erase the very women that Title IX was enacted to protect. The Department of Education has unilaterally expanded the prohibition against discrimination based on “sex” to include a prohibition against discrimination based on “sex stereotypes‚ sex-related characteristics (including intersex traits)‚ pregnancy or related conditions‚ sexual orientation‚ and gender identity.” None of these terms was in the minds of the ratifiers of Title IX in 1972‚ but that’s of no concern to the Department of Education‚ which believes its vast expansion of the word “sex” is legally sound. Federal courts have disagreed.    Shortly after midnight Monday morning‚ the Defense of Freedom Institute and the states of Louisiana‚ Mississippi‚ Montana‚ and Idaho filed the first of the three lawsuits in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana against Cardona‚ Assistant Education Secretary for Civil Rights Catherine Lhamon‚ and the Department of Education as a whole. In the complaint seeking declaratory and injunctive relief‚ the Defense of Freedom Institute writes that the rule “is a naked attempt to strongarm our schools into molding our children … in the government’s preferred image of how a child should think‚ act‚ and speak. The final rule is an affront to the dignity of families and school administrators everywhere‚ and it is nowhere near legal.” Among other claims‚ DFI argues that the Title IX rule interferes with the states’ ability to enforce their own duly enacted laws protecting girls’ and women’s scholastic athletics and defining “sex” for purposes of state law. It also claims the rule violates the Administrative Procedure Act—a federal law governing all of executive agency rulemaking. The Administrative Procedure Act requires courts to “hold unlawful and set aside agency action” that is “arbitrary‚ capricious‚ an abuse of discretion‚ or otherwise not in accordance with law”; “contrary to constitutional right‚ power‚ privilege‚ or immunity”; or “in excess of statutory jurisdiction‚ authority‚ or limitations‚ or short of statutory right.” In a public statement‚ the states’ lawyers weighed in‚ with Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill‚ a Republican‚ saying: “This is all for a political agenda‚ ignoring significant safety concerns for young women students in preschools‚ elementary schools‚ middle schools‚ high schools‚ colleges and universities across Louisiana and the entire country.” Mississippi Attorney General Lynn Fitch‚ a Republican‚ added: Title IX has been a game-changer for generations of women. For more than 50 years‚ it has given young girls an opportunity to compete on a level playing field and offered them a fair chance to excel. The Biden administration’s pursuit of an extremist political agenda here will destroy these important gains. … The administration’s legal theories are novel‚ at best‚ and they cut legal corners to push them through‚ and we intend to defeat this rule in the courts. The second suit was brought by Alabama in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama‚ in conjunction with Florida‚ Georgia‚ South Carolina‚ and the organizations Independent Women’s Law Center‚ Parents Defending Education‚ and Speech First. “At the time of enactment‚ no one doubted that the law’s use of ‘sex’ referred to biological sex … all relevant indicators confirmed what everyone understood: ‘sex‚’ as used in Title IX‚ means biological sex and does not include ‘gender identity’ or sexual orientation‚” the parties argue in the suit‚ claiming that compliance with the new Title IX rule would be burdensome and costly as well as hamper the states’ ability to enforce their own laws. And‚ like those in the Defense of Freedom Institute’s lawsuit‚ the plaintiffs also claim the rule violates the Administrative Procedure Act. Within hours‚ Texas also had filed a lawsuit against the Department of Education and various federal officials over the Title IX rule. Like the plaintiffs in the previous lawsuits‚ Texas claims the Department of Education had violated the Administrative Procedure Act‚ writing: “If Congress intends to impose a condition on the grant of federal funding under Title IX‚ it must do so with ‘a clear voice’ [and] ‘unambiguously.’” By drafting a significant statutory rewrite of Title IX—something that Texas argues the Department of Education lacks authority to do—the rule interfered with the state sovereignty of Texas and impeded the state’s ability to enforce its own laws. In a press release‚ Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton‚ a Republican‚ says: Texas will not allow Joe Biden to rewrite Title IX at whim‚ destroying legal protections for women in furtherance of his radical obsession with gender ideology. …This attempt to subvert federal law is plainly illegal‚ undemocratic‚ and divorced from reality. Texas will always take the lead to oppose Biden’s extremist‚ destructive policies that put women at risk. If the new Title IX rule is blocked by any of the federal judges who will hear these cases‚ it won’t be the first time the Biden administration’s interpretation of Title IX has been held up. After a coalition of 20 states led by Tennessee originally sued the Department of Education in 2022‚ a federal judge halted the earlier‚ informal Title IX guidance in those states.    Although the U.S. Supreme Court has appeared allergic to consideration of transgender “rights‚” it undoubtedly will be forced at some point to wrestle with the notion of whether the president has the authority to change longstanding federal civil rights law with a stroke of a pen. In 2022‚ the high court‚ in West Virginia v. EPA‚ struck down the Environmental Protection Agency’s attempt to create authority for itself out of thin air to regulate the electricity sector‚ and with it‚ a major component of the American economy’s bedrock based on a narrow portion of the Clean Air Act. The Supreme Court wrote: “Administrative agencies must be able to point to ‘clear congressional authorization’ when they claim the power to make decisions of vast ‘economic and political significance.’” The high court ruled that EPA lacked that authority in 2022. And now‚ the Department of Education lacks authority for its Title IX rule. The question that remains to be answered is when the Biden administration’s long-discussed Title IX rule finally will be struck down. In the meantime‚ school administrators across the country wait for a resolution of what “equality” in the 2024-25 school year will look like.   The post Well‚ That Was Fast: 3 Federal Lawsuits‚ Dropping Simultaneously‚ Challenge Education Department’s New Title IX Rule appeared first on The Daily Signal.

South Korea’s liberal opposition parties scored a decisive victory in the recent National Assembly elections‚ routing the ruling conservative party of President Yoon Suk Yeol. The election earlier this month was seen as a referendum on Yoon’s first two years in office and the results risk turning him into a lame duck for the rest of his single‚ five-year term. The opposition will be emboldened to impede Yoon’s domestic policies and reform plans. However‚ South Korea’s president likely will continue foreign and security policies that closely align with U.S. strategic interests. Yoon was elected in May 2022 after espousing principled security policies to strengthen South Korea’s alliance with the United States‚ overcome historic animosities with Japan to focus on current regional challenges‚ and push back against the rising threats from China and North Korea. He pledged to increase defense spending and improve South Korea’s military. Yoon delivered on his promises‚ enabling a resurgence in allied deterrence and defense capabilities against North Korea’s growing nuclear and missile arsenals. In 2022‚ the U.S. and South Korea resumed large-scale military exercises and Washington restarted rotational deployments of strategic assets (bombers‚ submarines‚ and aircraft carriers)‚ both after a four-year hiatus. Yoon’s courageous outreach to Japan was harshly criticized by the opposition party but invigorated bilateral relations and enabled resumption of trilateral military cooperation with the United States. Yoon’s April 2023 summit in Washington and the historic Camp David summit in August with the U.S. and Japan‚ were both resoundingly successful in affirming and expanding allied cooperation on wide-ranging security‚ diplomatic‚ and economic topics. Resounding Election Loss for Yoon South Korea’s unicameral National Assembly is elected every four years‚ but the one-term president is elected every five years. In the April 10 election‚ the progressive Democratic Party and affiliated Democratic United Party won 175 of a total of 300 seats‚ while the ruling People Power Party and affiliated People Future Party won 108 seats. (The Rebuilding Korea Party won 12 seats and could align itself with the progressive opposition.) The opposition gained enough seats to fast-track legislation and end filibusters‚ but fell short of the 200-seat supermajority that would have given it the power to override presidential vetoes‚ amend the Constitution‚ or impeach Yoon. Voter turnout‚ at 67% of the electorate‚ was the highest for a South Korean legislative election in 32 years. Major issues included the slowing national economy‚ rising prices‚ and various candidate scandals. Foreign and security issues did not seem to resonate with the electorate. Voters punished Yoon’s party for its perceived mismanagement of the economy and unwillingness to work with the opposition. Biggest Impact on Domestic‚ Not Security‚ Policies Yoon’s term has been marked by government gridlock‚ with legislative resistance to his policies as well as his frequent vetoes of National Assembly initiatives. This impasse will continue‚ with Yoon finding it difficult to implement his promised reforms to the country’s education‚ pension‚ and labor systems. Yoon isn’t a traditional politician‚ having spent his career as a prosecutor. He is less interested in polling data on policies or his personal popularity. He has set a firm course for aligning with the U.S. and Japan while raising South Korea’s international role as a “global pivotal state.” Yoon will be undeterred by his party’s loss at the polls and will maintain his foreign and security agenda. After narrowly winning election two years ago‚ he has faced a majority opposition party in the National Assembly and low popularity ratings throughout his tenure. Despite those factors‚ he implemented bold foreign policy changes. However‚ Yoon now may face greater challenges in implementing his policies due to an energized opposition party that is eager to obstruct his priorities‚ his own political party’s distancing itself from an unpopular president‚ and bureaucrats’ fear of being perceived as too closely aligned with Yoon lest it hurt their careers after a possible party change in the 2027 presidential election. The opposition party is expected to step up its criticism of Yoon’s foreign policies‚ since it favors a more accommodating stance toward Pyongyang and Beijing‚ resistance to improving relations with Japan‚ and greater independence from U.S. policies. But such policies have less public support due to the failed U.S. and South Korean summits with North Korea in 2018-19‚ Pyongyang’s rejection of all requests for dialogue‚ and escalating provocations. Pressing Ahead on Strengthening Alliances Yoon and Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida have been stalwart allies in Washington’s efforts to rally Indo-Pacific nations to enhance measures to combat the growing Chinese and North Korean threats. Both South Korea and Japan have made significant improvements to their militaries and have striven to assume larger security roles in the region. The U.S. should intensify ongoing initiatives to develop a latticework of multilateral security partnerships in the Indo-Pacific‚ as well as economic collaborations to reduce China’s ability to economically coerce or retaliate against nations that anger Beijing. The post Election Loss for South Korea’s Ruling Party Unlikely to Affect Pro-US Security Policies appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Judge Juan Merchan fined former President Donald Trump $9‚000 on Tuesday and held him in contempt for violating his gag order‚ warning he may impose jail time for future violations. Merchan ordered Trump to remove the offending posts by 2:15 p.m. Tuesday and to pay the fine by May 3. He rejected Trump’s defense that he was simply engaging in political speech by responding to attacks by witnesses like Michael Cohen and Stormy Daniels‚ writing that the court is “keenly aware of‚ and protective of‚ Defendant’s First Amendment rights‚ particularly given his candidacy for the office of President of the United States.” “It is critically important that Defendant’s legitimate free speech rights not be curtailed‚ that he be able to fully campaign for the office which he seeks and that he be able to respond and defend himself against political attacks‚” Merchan wrote. “For that reason‚ this Court exercised discretion when it crafted the Expanded Order and delayed issuing it until the eve of trial.” However‚ Merchan warned Trump that he “will not tolerate continued willful violations of its lawful orders and that if necessary and appropriate under the circumstances‚ it will impose an incarceratory punishment.” Prosecutors argued in court filings that Trump violated the order in 10 instances‚ arguing for the judge to impose the maximum $1‚000 fine for each alleged violation. The gag order prevents Trump from making statements about witnesses‚ prosecutors other than the district attorney‚ court staff and jurors‚ along with family members of the staff‚ district attorney or judge.  Last week‚ prosecutors brought up four new violations of the order‚ which Merchan will consider during a hearing Thursday. “He’s allowed to respond to political attacks‚ Your Honor‚” Trump’s attorney‚ Todd Blanche‚ told the judge during a hearing last week considering the alleged violations‚ according to Politico. “There is no dispute that President Trump is facing a barrage of political attacks from all sides‚ including from the two witnesses referenced in the early post.” Merchan imposed the gag order on Trump on March 26‚ but expanded it on April 1 after Trump attacked the judge’s daughter‚ a Democratic activist‚ on social media. Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation The post NY Judge Fines Trump for Violating Gag Order‚ Warns of Possible Jail Time appeared first on The Daily Signal.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.‚ an independent presidential candidate‚ has declared his intent to fight against a potential TikTok ban‚ arguing that the measure is more about political posturing than genuine national security concerns. This announcement comes as the Biden administration tightens its grip on Chinese technology firms with a recent $95 billion national security package that allows for banning the app if its parent company‚ ByteDance‚ does not sell it. Kennedy‚ voicing his opposition on the social platform X‚ stated‚ “I’m going to file a lawsuit challenging the TikTok ban on Constitutional grounds.” He believes the move to block TikTok has little to do with protecting user data from Chinese surveillance and is more of a distraction. “Don’t be fooled — the TikTok ban is not about China harvesting your data. That’s a smoke screen‚” he declared. Watch the video Kennedy’s skepticism about the government’s motives is driven by what he perceives as widespread data collection by intelligence agencies. He noted that such activities are common across various nations‚ with the US being a significant player in this realm. “Intelligence agencies from lots of countries‚ especially ours‚ are harvesting your data from everywhere all the time‚” he emphasized. The recent security package signed by President Biden has brought this issue to the forefront. If ByteDance‚ TikTok’s Chinese parent company‚ does not sell the app‚ the law provides grounds to ban it in the US. However‚ ByteDance has categorically denied any intention to sell TikTok. “Foreign media reports that ByteDance is exploring the sale of TikTok are untrue‚” the company stated‚ indicating that it “doesn’t have any plan to sell TikTok.” TikTok’s representatives have also expressed their discontent with the ban‚ labeling it unconstitutional. The post RFK Jr. To Challenge TikTok Ban on Constitutional Grounds appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties‚ subscribe to Reclaim The Net. Only two weeks after surviving a stabbing attack‚ Bishop Mar Mari Emmanuel returned to give his sermon‚ and an impassioned plea to the Australian authorities not to undermine freedom of speech in the country. In the wake of the terrorist act known as the Wakeley church stabbing which left another person injured‚ and the subsequent protests‚ Australian authorities were quick to go after social media companies and put additional pressure on them. Meta and X were targeted by the government to block what it termed “offensive” content (videos of the attack) both in Australia‚ and globally. In addition‚ government officials and some opposition representatives took the opportunity to push for even more restrictive rules around content censorship (“moderation”) in Australia. However‚ the Orthodox Christian dignitary took his own opportunity to remind the government that treating free speech as a danger and pushing for censorship means they are ultimately undermining democracy. X is trying to fight censorship orders – a total of 65 videos were slated for removal by Australia’s eSafety commissioner. According to X lawyer Marcus Hoyne‚ who spoke during a Federal Court hearing last week‚ the bishop has spoken strongly against any censorship even before his first sermon after being released from the hospital‚ urging for the videos of the attack to remain available to the public. “And for us to say that free speech is dangerous‚ that free speech cannot be possible in a democratic country – I’m yet to fathom this‚” Bishop Emmanuel said‚ addressing Prime Minister Albanese and his cabinet. He preceded this by saying that he believes that “every human being has the right to express their belief” and that he believes in the integrity and the identity of everyone. The bishop revealed that he views free speech as the ability to criticize‚ and use speech that may be perceived as “offensive to some degree” – but that treating that as the cause of problems would mean that “everything should be censored.” “Then where is democracy&;#63; Then where is humanity&;#63; Where is integrity&;#63; Where are the morals&;#63; Where are the ethics&;#63; What are the principles&;#63; What are the values which the Western world more-so have been fighting for&;#63;” Bishop Emmanuel wondered. X and Elon Musk will no doubt be relieved to have the support of the victim of the attack himself in the bid to keep the material online‚ as they argue the need to protect free speech as a fundamental feature of a democracy. The post Bishop Makes Bold Stand Against Censorship in the Wake of Wakeley Church Stabbing appeared first on Reclaim The Net.

Arabella: The Far-Left Billionaires' Network That Vows to Fundamentally Transform America