News She-Ra Amazon MGM’s Live-Action She-Ra Has Found Its Writer We feel pretty good about this one, honestly By Molly Templeton | Published on October 4, 2024 Comment 0 Share New Share Amazon MGM Studios has been developing its live-action She-Ra series for so long that we first covered it in 2021, when it felt awfully close on the heels of the 2021 finale of Netflix’s perfect She-Ra and the Princesses of Power. Now, three years later, the new take on She-Ra has a writer attached—and it’s a surprising and interesting choice. Variety reports that Heidi Schreck has signed on as writer and executive producer. Schreck is the writer of What the Constitution Means to Me, which was a Pulitzer finalist as a play, and was later filmed and presented as an Amazon Original film with the Broadway cast—which includes Schreck as the star (pictured above). She’s also written episodes of Nurse Jackie, Billions, and I Love Dick. She has a stack of awards, including three Obies, the Horton Foote Playwriting Award, and the Hull-Warriner Award from the Dramatists Guild. None of this really screams “Fantastical superpowered princesses, up next!” but that’s part of what makes it intriguing. This new take on She-Ra is reportedly entirely unconnected to the animated series; the previously announced logline says it’s “an epic fantasy series about an orphaned young woman who leads a revolution to save her planet from annihilation.” One can only hope it still has some lightness, and isn’t a super-serious, gritty, Game of Thrones-ed up She-Ra. Director Nicole Kassell has a considerable breadth of experience (she’s directed episodes of Watchmen, The Leftovers, and The Americans, among others) and producer Robin Sweet’s resume includes time on Castle Rock, Better Call Saul, and Outer Range. DreamWorks Animation is also producing the live-action show. [end-mark] The post Amazon MGM’s Live-Action <i>She-Ra</i> Has Found Its Writer appeared first on Reactor.

It’s late in the campaign, so the network “news” programs often seem indistinguishable from the cascade of negative campaign ads that air around the harrumphing anchormen and anchorwomen. Rich Noyes at NewsBusters reported that the tone of coverage about the Trump-Vance ticket (excluding statements by politicians) from July 21 to Sept. 27 was 96% negative on ABC, 81% negative on CBS, and 87% negative on NBC. By contrast, the coverage of the Harris-Walz ticket was 97% positive on ABC, 85% positive on CBS, and 65% positive on NBC. Bias by omission is part of that math. Since the study came out, London’s Daily Mail offered an anonymous accuser who claimed she was a girlfriend of Vice President Kamala Harris’ husband, Doug Emhoff, when he is said to have violently slapped her face in 2012 after an event at the Cannes Film Festival in France. An allegation like that should have a name and a face before it becomes a big story. (Emhoff denied it.) ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR, and PBS skipped it. But network “news judgment” depends on who benefits. On Halloween night in 2011, Politico reported that when then-Republican presidential candidate Herman Cain headed the National Restaurant Association, it settled two sexual harassment lawsuits. Citing unnamed sources, Politico reported two unnamed women alleged Cain was guilty of conversations “of a sexually suggestive nature.” The networks leaped on that underbaked, anonymously sourced story on the black conservative. Laugh now at NBC’s Matt Lauer crowing Cain was “finding out the hard way about the attention that goes along with being a front-runner.” He meant “Republican front-runner.” George Stephanopoulos leaped on the story as a “bombshell blast,” a shameless move for the “ruin the bimbo” specialist. In the first week of the Cain scandal, ABC, CBS, and NBC combined for 84 stories on the allegations against Cain before the media would or could identify an accuser with a name or a face. Sometimes the accusers are named. Consider Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh‘s wildest accuser during his confirmation battle in 2018, Julie Swetnick, who alleged that Kavanaugh was present at a party where she was gang-raped. The networks didn’t hold back on that. Instead, we heard dopey disclaimers, like “NBC News has not independently corroborated Swetnick’s claims.” They can’t do a Democratic scandal story (like Hunter Biden‘s laptop) because “we have to independently corroborate it.” In 2020, when former Biden aide Tara Reade alleged that President Joe Biden sexually assaulted her inside the Capitol, The New York Times and Washington Post published lengthy stories investigating the charge. But ABC and NBC couldn’t spend a single second on it. CBS aired it for 63 seconds. This pattern isn’t just about sex scandals. On Sept. 27, Immigration and Customs Enforcement revealed that it estimates there are roughly 13,000 noncitizen murderers running loose in the country, and nearly 16,000 noncitizens convicted of sexual assault. “The NBC Nightly News” provided a sentence. ABC, CBS, NPR, and PBS haven’t located it. Now fast forward to Wednesday, when Judge Tanya Chutkan unsealed special counsel Jack Smith’s 165-page brief about former President Donald Trump’s actions to deny the 2020 election results and reactions to the Jan. 6 riot. ABC, CBS, NBC, NPR, and PBS combined for more than 38 breathless minutes on that “bombshell.” Excluding Democratic voters who love this partisan tilt, naive swing voters tuning into these leftist “legacy” networks are served an amazingly tilted menu of information and misinformation. Stories that could damage the GOP don’t have to be confirmed. They just have to be exploited. We consider this shameless partisan propaganda. They consider it “saving democracy.” COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post Network ‘News Judgment’ Depends on Who Benefits, Who Doesn’t appeared first on The Daily Signal.

When Joe Biden became president, the Middle East was calm. Now it is in the midst of a multifront war.So quiet was the inheritance from the prior Trump administration that nearly three years later, on Sept. 29, 2023—and just eight days before the Oct. 7 Hamas massacre of Israelis—Biden’s national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, could still brag that “the Middle East region is quieter today than it has been in two decades.”So, what exactly happened to the inherited calm that led to the current nonstop chaos of the present?In a word, theocratic Iran—the nexus of almost all current Middle East terrorism and conflict—was unleashed by Team Biden after having been neutered by the Trump administration.The Biden-Harris administration adopted a five-step revisionist protocol that appeased and encouraged Iran and its terrorist surrogates Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis.The result was a near guarantee that something akin to the Oct. 7 massacres would inevitably follow—along with a subsequent year of violence that has now engulfed the Middle East.First, on the 2020 campaign trail, Biden damned longtime American ally Saudi Arabia as a “pariah.”He overturned the policies of both the previous Obama and Trump administrations by siding with the Iranian-supplied terrorist Houthis in their war on Saudi Arabia.Biden accused the kingdom of war crimes, warning it would “be held accountable” for its actions in Yemen. Biden-Harris took the murderous Houthis off the U.S. terrorist list.Almost immediately followed continuous Houthi attacks on international shipping, Israel, and U.S. warships—rendering the Red Sea, the entryway to the Suez Canal, de facto closed to international maritime transit.Worse still, by the time of the 2022 midterms, when spiraling gas prices threatened Democratic congressional majorities, Biden opportunistically flipped and implored Saudi Arabia to pump more oil to lower world prices before the November election. Appearing obnoxious and then obsequious to an old Middle East ally is a prescription for regional chaos.Second, Biden-Harris nihilistically killed off the Trump administration’s “Abraham Accords.” That diplomatic breakthrough had proved a successful blueprint for moderate Arab nations to seek detente with Israel, ending decades of hostilities to unite against the common Middle East threat of Iran.Third, Biden begged Iran to reenter the appeasing, so-called Iran Deal that virtually had ensured that Iran would eventually get the bomb.Worse yet, it dropped oil sanctions against the theocracy, allowing a near-destitute Iran to recoup $100 billion in profits. And it green-lighted $6 billion in hostage ransoms to Tehran.An enriched Tehran immediately sent billions of dollars in support and weapons to the anti-Western terrorists of Hamas, Hezbollah, and the Houthis to attack Israel, Americans, and international shipping. Iran soon began partnering with China and Russia to form a new anti-American axis.Biden-Harris also fled abruptly from Afghanistan, abandoning billions in weapons and American contractors. The humiliation thus virtually destroyed American deterrence in the Middle East, inciting enemies and endangering friends.Fourth, Biden-Harris restored hundreds of millions of dollars in aid to the West Bank and Gaza, but without any guarantees that the Palestinian Authority and Hamas would desist from their past serial terrorist acts.In the case of Hamas, U.S. and Western “humanitarian aid” simply freed up more fungible dollars in Gaza to arm Hamas and to expand its subterranean tunnel complex essential to its Oct. 7 massacres and hostage-taking.Fifth, from the outset of the ensuing increased tensions, Biden-Harris began pressuring the Israelis to act “proportionally” in responding to the massacre of some 1,200 Israelis and nearly 20,000 missiles, rockets, and drones launched at their homeland from Iran, the Houthis, Hamas, and Hezbollah.Such straitjacketing of our closest Middle East friend further signaled the Iranian-backed terrorists that there was now “daylight” between the U.S. and its closest regional ally. That opportunity provided still further incentives for Iran to test just how far it could safely go in attacking Israel.But why did Biden-Harris so foolishly ignite the Middle East?In part, the administration naively tried to resurrect the old, discredited Obama administration notion of “creative tension”—of empowering a rogue Iran and its terrorists to play off Israel and the moderate Arab regimes, as a new sort of balance of power in the region.In part, Biden-Harris was caving to increased antisemitism at home and the rise of powerful, pro-Palestinian groups on U.S. campuses and in critical swing Electoral College states.In part, Biden-Harris was naive and gullible. The two bought into the anti-Americanism and anti-Israel boilerplate of our enemies. So, they thought to make amends by seeing Iran and its terrorists as the moral equivalent of democratic, pro-American Israel.Their malignant legacy is the current Middle East disaster. (C)2024 Tribune Content Agency, LLC. We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post How to Blow Up the Middle East War in Five Easy Steps appeared first on The Daily Signal.

DAILY CALLER NEWS FOUNDATION—America First Legal on Thursday announced a lawsuit against Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes for refusing to hand over the names of over 200,000 registered voters who have allegedly not provided proof of citizenship. Fontes is breaking the law by refusing to comply with a records request that demands the names of roughly 218,000 individuals who are registered to vote but did not provide proof of citizenship, according to the lawsuit. The lawsuit comes just weeks before Election Day, with former President Donald Trump and Vice President Kamala Harris remaining in a dead heat in the state. “America First Legal continues to lead the fight for election integrity,” Stephen Miller, America First Legal president and former senior adviser in the Trump administration, said in a press release. “We are suing the state of Arizona for refusing to provide the list of 218,000 voters who failed or refused to establish citizenship.” “It is absolutely imperative that we stop the dire threat of illegal alien voting, which is the gravest form of foreign election interference,” Miller continued. Maricopa County Recorder Stephen Richer identified in September a glitch in the voter roll system that marked more than 97,000 registered voters as having provided documentary proof of citizenship—which is required under Arizona law—even though these individuals had not done so. Richer filed an emergency petition in the Arizona Supreme Court on Sept. 17 in order to prevent these voter registrants from participating in local and state elections. Fontes announced Monday that his office had discovered an additional “set of approximately 120,000 Arizonans who may be affected by a data coding oversight within [the Arizona Department of Transportation’s] Motor Vehicle Division and Arizona registration databases.” The recent disclosure puts the total number of registered voters in the state who allegedly did not provide proof of citizenship up to roughly 218,000. The 2020 presidential election in Arizona was decided by a margin of less than 11,000 votes. Immediately after Richer’s lawsuit, America First Legal filed a public records request asking the Arizona Secretary of State’s Office to hand over the list of all individuals who had unlawfully registered to vote, according to a press release from the organization. Fontes denied the request, alleging that disclosure of the names would lead to their harassment and that compiling the list would be too burdensome for staff. America First Legal argues that Arizona’s public records request laws require Fontes to produce this type of information when requested. “There have been major failures in the administration of just about every general election in Arizona from 2016 until now,” stated James Rogers, America First Legal senior counsel. “And every time anyone expresses concern, how does Secretary Fontes react? Victim blaming.” “That is not what Arizonans expect from their elected leaders. The law requires Secretary Fontes to produce these records, and AFL will work to hold him accountable until he does,” Rogers continued. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of the Strong Communities Foundation of Arizona, also known as “EZAZ.org.” Fontes did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment. Originally published by the Daily Caller News Foundation The post Swing State Sued for Withholding Names of Over 200,000 Registered Voters Who Did Not Provide Proof of Citizenship appeared first on The Daily Signal.

Some Democrats Feeling Nervous About Kamala's 'Run Out the Clock' Campaign

A new season of NBC's Law and Order premiered last night with an episode about a conservative journalist who helps his friend murder an innocent woman. The victim, Macy Harper (Antonia Timbol), is a district attorney who was prosecuting a conservative senator.  In the episode, "Catch and Kill," Harper is found brutally murdered in her home. Police initially arrest an illegal immigrant who lives in a hotel shelter nearby.  Of course, the illegal immigrant turns out to be innocent. He was wrongly suspected because he was wearing a sweatshirt that had been thrown in the trash outside Harper's home. He tells the police that he saw a white man with a beard yelling at the woman outside her house. Unsurprisingly for network television, every creepy guy from this point onward in the rest of the episode is a white man. White men must always be the perps on crime dramas nowadays. As the episode progresses, the audience learns that the biggest villains aren't just white guys. They are conservative or conservative-adjacent white guys. Jeff Sanders (Ari Blinder), the man who yelled at the victim outside her house, has posts on social media saying, "Harper sits in her liberal mansion on the Upper East Side thinking she can do whatever she wants. It's up to us to let her know that she's wrong." Sanders tells the police that the victim was "a puppet of the deep state who weaponized her position to take down [conservative] Senator Holt." He has a valid alibi though, so he is crossed off the list of suspects. Eventually, police discover that the victim's wealthy fiancée, Dylan Phipps (Bill Barrett), is the real killer. He murdered Harper because she was breaking up with him. Phipps had help from a "right-wing" journalist friend named Kenneth Lane (Michael Esper).  Phipps had abused Harper long before the night of the murder and his rage was caught on hotel cameras. Lane had bought the videos of abuse to protect Phipps. In many ways, the fictional video shown in the episode is similar to real video released this year of rapper Sean "Diddy" Combs attacking his girlfriend in a hotel hallway. Lane also provided Phipps with an alibi and helped him trick Harper into opening her door the night of the murder. As the episode makes clear throughout, Lane is arrogant and a liar. When assistant district attorneys Nolan Price (Hugh Dancy) and Samantha Maroun (Odelya Halevi) stop by his office, he condescendingly refers to Maroun as "girl." Lane: Look, I already told the police what happened.  Maroun: No, you told them what you wanted them to believe. Lane: Well, your girl's got a bad attitude. Price: Excuse me? Lane: Sorry, that came out wrong. Maroun: No, I'm pretty sure that came out exactly the way you meant it.  Lane: [Sighs] I wish I could help. Macy was an amazing girl, but she and Dylan were happy. They were in love. Maroun: No, he was abusing her. Lane: What the hell are you talking about? Maroun: She was staying at a shelter for abused women. People don't go there because they're bored or to get a spa treatment.  Lane: I find that impossible to believe. In any event, I need to get back to work. So, if you don't mind-- - Maroun: One last question.  Why are you covering for this bastard? Even before the full extent of Lane's role in the murder is discovered, the episode infers he must be a bad man because he runs a popular right-wing media site. Maroun says, "Lane sells right-wing porn wrapped up as news."  Such nasty right-of-center characters are on brand for Law and Order. In real life, the Democratic presidential candidate's husband was recently accused of slapping a former girlfriend in public. Yet in Law and Order's fictional world, it is conservative men that women must fear. Left-wing Hollywood is a sea of filth and misogyny, but the entertainment industry is always projecting and accusing conservatives of being vile like them.

Q. How do you know that Liz Cheney's endorsement of Kamala Harris is entirely unlikely to shift the election in any detectable way? A. When a CNN liberal admits that its impact will likely be limited to "one lady in Wisconsin." Those were the surprising words of legal analyst Elliot Williams, who served for eight years in the Obama administration, on today's CNN This Morning. His remark earned a round of laughter on the panel, though former Biden aide Meghan Hays suggested that  "One lady might decide this entire election!" GOP strategist Matt Gorman was in rare form. Responding to Trump calling Cheney a "stupid war hawk," Gorman said, "I think that was the name of my college mascot."  He added "I'm not going to pretend that Liz Cheney's endorsement going to have an effect in this race, except make extremely online liberals feel good about a Republican for once" and granting a "media moment" -- because "Republicans attacking other Republicans is going to be catnip for the mainstream media. " Putting aside the wan hope that the one lady in Wisconsin could end up swinging the whole election to Harris, there was no serious suggestion on the panel that Cheney's endorsement would have any measurable impact on the election. But it does give media Democrats a reason for good cheer, joy and vibes and all that.  If an endorsement falls in the forest, and no voter cares about it . . .  Here's the transcript. CNN This Morning 10/4/24 6:01 am EDT DONALD TRUMP:  Liz Cheney is a stupid war hawk. All she wants to do is shoot missiles at people. . . . .  MATT GORMAN:  Yeah, I mean, stupid war hawk. I think that was my college mascot. But no look, Liz Cheney can vote for anyone she wants. I'm just, I'm not going to pretend that Liz Cheney's endorsement going to have an effect in this race, except make extremely online liberals feel good about a Republican for once.  But then, look, I also think that the Kamala Harris team is smart in this regard. They know that Republicans attacking other Republicans is going to be catnip for the mainstream media. So setting it in Ripon, where the Republican party was founded, and doing something, it's less about, I think actually the Liz Cheney thing, but trying to create a media moment that contrasts with Trump, I think, to Alex's point. . . .  ELLIOT WILLIAMS: There's nobody that votes against Kamala Harris because Liz Cheney is supporting her. But there might be people who could support her on account of Liz Cheney's support.  Now look, it's probably one lady in Wisconsin. It's not a wide swath -- MEGHAN HAYS: One lady might decide this entire election! WILLIAMS: Glad as I am at the notion that one lady is going to decide the entire election, however, you know, to your point, it's not going to be a major swing one way or another. GORMAN: I think they're all not equal, right? If Nikki Haley came out and supported Kamala Harris, which she didn't. But if she did, that would be a little different thing. If John McCain were still around, he was out there campaigning for Kamala Harris in Arizona, I would take folks' point here. But I think not all Republicans are built alike, right? So trotting out random former Trump staffers or Liz Cheney, I think the power of endorsement also comes when it's not as expected, right? Liz Cheney has very clearly been a critic of Trump for many years now. Whatever you think about it, the issues that really propel her have, I think, in large part, already been baked in, so it's less of a surprise.

The Regime Media have developed a Strange New Respect for conservative Republicans of a certain inclination, now that they can be used as rungs on a ladder that leads to Republicans voting for Vice President Kamala Harris. The most prominent of these, former Congresswoman Liz Cheney, was prominently featured on the network evening newscasts. Watch as Norah O’Donnell of the CBS Evening News makes sure to create that permission structure: NORAH O’DONNELL: Tonight, the race for The White House runs through an unusual stop for the Democratic nominee. Actually, the birthplace of the Republican Party. That's Ripon, Wisconsin, where Vice President Kamala Harris appeared with former Congresswoman Liz Cheney. Remember, Cheney is a lifetime Republican and a former member of the January 6th Committee.  Correspondent Nancy Cordes made sure to echo the talking point about the rally being held at Ripon, Wisconsin, which houses the famous Little White Schoolhouse wherein the Republican Party was founded. NANCY CORDES: A big moment in tiny Ripon, Wisconsin. Former Republican congresswoman Liz Cheney, the daughter of a former vice president, making her first appearance with the Democratic nominee. The highlighting of Ripon seems to me to intend to convey conquest, not unlike American troops operating out of Saddam Hussein’s palaces during the Iraq War. Except that in this case, there is no conquest! This whole exercise is merely the Democrats’ unsavory attempt to woo one wing of the Party. This is the same media that, having nicknamed Vice President Dick Cheney “Darth Vader”, now want to turn his daughter Liz into a political Princess Leia. Or, at least, pretend to do so for purposes of political expediency. In keeping with the January 6th theme, Corden sprinkled some of Special Counsel Jack Smith’s filing into her report, as did NBC’s Gabe Gutierrez, who at least showed that not all Republicans are impressed by Cheney, and noted her primary blowout loss: GABE GUTIERREZ: Here in battleground Wisconsin, Trump supporters we spoke with are deeply skeptical of Cheney, who lost her GOP primary in a landslide.  Do you think that Liz Cheney speaks for the Republican party? VOTERS: No. Absolutely not. Over at ABC, Mary Bruce was Mary Brucing, as per her normal custom. Bruce most enthusiastically cast the Cheneys as GOP stalwarts, but made sure to spare time to note the endorsement of Kamala Harris by that other staunch conservative Bruce Springsteen (I kid): MARY BRUCE: Cheney has been on a mission to convince her fellow Republicans to put country over party, and back Harris. Stressing they share common values, like preserving international alliances like NATO. And argues when it comes to the economy, Trump's plan for across-the-board tariffs does not represent conservative fiscal values. Her father the former Vice President, a staunch Republican, has also endorsed Harris, saying, "There has never been an individual who is a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump. He tried to steal the last election using lies and violence to keep himself in power, after the voters had rejected him. He can never be trusted with power again."  And today, another notable endorsement. Bruce Springsteen, throwing his support to Harris, with a similar warning. BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN: Donald Trump is the most dangerous candidate for president in my lifetime. His disdain for the sanctity of our Constitution, the sanctity of democracy, the sanctity of the rule of law, and the sanctity of the peaceful transfer of power should disqualify him from the Office of President ever again. It should be noted that Bruce and Cordes closed out their reports by citing the exact same dramatic point in Cheney’s speech. Make of that what you will: BRUCE: And Liz Cheney here just saying that Kamala Harris is now standing in the breach, saying she's trying to unite reasonable people from across the political spectrum.  CORDES: Here in Wisconsin, Cheney just said that Harris is standing in the breach at a critical time in this nation's history, and she urged conservatives to vote for her.  None of these reports featured anyone questioning how Cheney voting for individuals seeking to impose censorship of “disinformation” defends the Constitution. Those inconsistencies don’t matter. The Regime gets to display the Cheneys in a manner reminiscent of a hunter hanging a 12-pointer’s head above the fireplace.  There was also no one on to warn Cheney that the influence and desirability of this breed of conservative has a limited shelf life, as Adam Kinzinger discovered. Nothing matters but the conquest. Click “expand” to view the full transcripts of the aforementioned reports as aired on their respective network evening newscasts on Thursday, October 3rd, 2024: ABC WORLD NEWS TONIGHT 10/3/24 6:38 PM DAVID MUIR: Meantime, the developing headline involving Vice President Kamala Harris at this hour, campaigning in Wisconsin with former Republican congresswoman Liz Cheney. The daughter of former Vice President Dick Cheney. She and her father have both endorsed Harris. And tonight, Harris with another endorsement. What Bruce Springsteen is now saying about the stakes in this election. Mary Bruce tonight from Wisconsin. MARY BRUCE: Tonight, Vice President Kamala Harris in Ripon, Wisconsin- the town considered the birthplace of the Republican Party, standing shoulder to shoulder with former Republican congresswoman Liz Cheney. CROWD: Thank you, Liz! LIZ CHENEY: Thank you. BRUCE: Cheney, daughter of former Republican Vice President Dick Cheney, was a three-term congresswoman, and the third-ranking Republican in the House, before going on to chair the January 6th Committee. Endorsing Harris, she declared Donald Trump a danger to democracy. CHENEY: I know that the most conservative of conservative values is fidelity to our Constitution. I tell you, I have never voted for a Democrat, but this year, I am proudly casting my vote for Vice President Kamala Harris. BRUCE: Cheney has been on a mission to convince her fellow Republicans to put country over party, and back Harris. Stressing they share common values, like preserving international alliances like NATO. And argues when it comes to the economy, Trump's plan for across-the-board tariffs does not represent conservative fiscal values. Her father the former Vice President, a staunch Republican, has also endorsed Harris, saying, "There has never been an individual who is a greater threat to our republic than Donald Trump. He tried to steal the last election using lies and violence to keep himself in power, after the voters had rejected him. He can never be trusted with power again." And today, another notable endorsement. Bruce Springsteen, throwing his support to Harris, with a similar warning. BRUCE SPRINGSTEEN: Donald Trump is the most dangerous candidate for president in my lifetime. His disdain for the sanctity of our Constitution, the sanctity of democracy, the sanctity of the rule of law, and the sanctity of the peaceful transfer of power should disqualify him from the Office of President ever again. BRUCE: And Liz Cheney here just saying that Kamala Harris is now standing in the breach, saying she's trying to unite reasonable people from across the political spectrum. It comes as the Harris campaign is now upping its outreach to GOP voters, with Republican supporters holding events this week in every key battleground state. David? MUIR: Mary Bruce, with Vice President Kamala Harris campaigning tonight with Liz Cheney there in Wisconsin. Mary, thank you. CBS EVENING NEWS 10/3/24 6:33 PM NORAH O’DONNELL: Tonight, the race for The White House runs through an unusual stop for the Democratic nominee. Actually, the birthplace of the Republican Party. That's Ripon, Wisconsin, where Vice President Kamala Harris appeared with former Congresswoman Liz Cheney. Remember, Cheney is a lifetime Republican and a former member of the January 6th Committee. At the same time, there was a campaign surprise from former First Lady Melania Trump, signaling her support for abortion rights, in spite of her husband boasting many times he probably overturned Roe vs. Wade. We get more now from CBS's Nancy Cordes. NANCY CORDES: A big moment in tiny Ripon, Wisconsin. Former Republican congresswoman Liz Cheney, the daughter of a former vice president, making her first appearance with the Democratic nominee. LIZ CHENEY: But I will be voting for Kamala Harris. CORDES: Cheney first announced her support last month, but she has been a critic of former President Donald Trump for years. And was vice chair of the January 6th Committee, which examined Trump's role in the Capitol insurrection. LIZ CHENEY: He is unfit for any office. CORDES: The Harris campaign has been working to highlight the growing list of Republicans who now oppose Trump. MIKE PENCE: I cannot in good conscience endorse Donald Trump this year. CORDES: Those defections rattled Steven Michek, a former Wisconsin sheriff who is switching to Harris after voting for Trump in 2016. STEVEN MICHEK: All of the changes in the administrative staff, just constant turnover of people, the just- unusual things of having all of your children employed in The White House was like, I would not do that in the Sheriff's Office. CORDES: In a court filing released yesterday, Special Counsel Jack Smith alleged that Trump ignored threats to his VP’s life during the Capitol Riot, allegedly telling an aide, "So what?" DONALD TRUMP: We won. We won. We did. It was a rigged election. CORDES: In Saginaw, Michigan today, Trump repeated his false claims about 2020 and warned of an apocalypse if Harris wins next month. TRUMP: Instead of a Golden Age, America will instead be plunged into a dark age. Your family finances will be permanently destroyed. CORDES: He did not address the new comments from his wife, Melania, who unexpectedly came out in favor of abortion rights in a video promoting her upcoming book. MELANIA TRUMP: There is no room for compromise when it comes to this essential right. CORDES: In an interview after the speech, Trump said he actually had spoken to his wife beforehand and told her she should share what was in her heart, even if they disagree. Here in Wisconsin, Cheney just said that Harris is standing in the breach at a critical time in this nation's history, and she urged conservatives to vote for her. Norah. O’DONNELL: So interesting that Melania Trump is saying that now. Nancy Cordes, thank you so much. NBC NIGHTLY NEWS 10/3/24 6:39 PM LESTER HOLT: Now to the race for president with former President Trump in- economy in the battleground Michigan state today. Vice President Harris is in Wisconsin with a prominent Republican, former congresswoman Liz Cheney. Here is Gabe Gutierrez. GABE GUTIERREZ: She was once one of the most conservative members of Congress, but tonight, Liz Cheney is standing alongside Vice President Harris. LIZ CHENEY: This year I am proudly casting my vote for Vice President Kamala Harris. GUTIERREZ: The vice president campaigning today in Ripon, Wisconsin, the birthplace of the Republican Party back in 1854. KAMALA HARRIS: The former president is really becoming quite desperate, and perhaps it's because he wants to distract from the fact that he has offered no plan for the American people. GUTIERREZ: Meanwhile, former President Trump slamming yesterday's release by a judge of new evidence from Special Counsel Jack Smith in the now-delayed January 6th case, including Trump allegedly responding "So what" to reports Mike Pence was in danger. DONALD TRUMP: This was a weaponization of government, and that's why it was released 30 days before the election. And there’s nothing new in there. GUTIERREZ: Trump today in battleground Michigan, blaming Harris for the ongoing port strike that is threatening to raise prices. TRUMP: Over the past four years, Kamala Harris has unleashed nothing but chaos and suffering for American labor with historic inflation, she’s made life excruciating for the blue collar workers. GUTIERREZ: Here in battleground Wisconsin, Trump supporters we spoke with are deeply skeptical of Cheney, who lost her GOP primary in a landslide.  Do you think that Liz Cheney speaks for the Republican party? VOTERS: No. Absolutely not. GUTIERREZ: But Jerry Eiler, who once voted for Trump, now backs Harris. Did Donald Trump drive you away from the Republican Party? JERRY EILER: Absolutely. I'm totally disillusioned with the way the MAGA group has gone and all the people who stand there and, like, pretend his lies are truth. GUTIERREZ: While Harris has received the most support from organized labor, earlier today the International Association of Fire Fighters voted not to endorse any candidate. That’s seen as a blow to Harris, just weeks after the Teamsters union did the same, Lester. HOLT: All right. Gabe, thanks very much.  

'THIS IS AN INSULT'! Glenn Beck Puts Biden-Harris Spending Priorities in a Maddening Nutshell

WOW: Whistleblowers Come Forward, Spill ALL the Beans on FEMA and It's SO Much Worse Than We Thought