ICE has been really working hard these last 10 months and now they just got another killer off the streets. A new report by the Department of Homeland Security has revealed a Moldovan woman who was in the United States illegally and on the run after being convicted of murder has been arrested. ICE authorities in Los Angeles arrested Victoria Sorocean for being in the United States illegally and later discovered she was wanted in Moldova after she was convicted of throwing another woman from a window of an apartment building. The New York Post reported more on Sorocean’s arrest and how she managed to stay in the United States so long: A Moldovan woman convicted of torturing and tossing a victim to their death from a ninth-floor window was arrested by US immigration officials – years after she fled her home country to avoid justice and was let into the US. Victoria Sorocean was arrested in Los Angeles by US Customs and Immigration Enforcement (ICE) on Nov. 4 after officials learned she was wanted in Moldova for a grisly murder, Fox News reported. Sorocean and an accomplice were found guilty that year of beating a victim with a stick and an electrical cable, then chucking their battered body from the window of an apartment building on to the pavement below. The Eastern European was convicted of premeditated murder with exceptional cruelty in 2013, and sentenced to 17 years in prison. But she escaped Moldova to dodge justice, and made her way to the US instead. The killer was first apprehended in the US in 2020, but managed to manipulate the legal system and asylum process to avoid deportation, ICE sources told Fox News. Her ploy seemed at first to work – after lodging numerous legal filings and appeals, she was eventually released back into the US in 2022. The DHS released the following photo: EXCLUSIVE: ICE Los Angeles has arrested a Moldovan fugitive illegal alien convicted in her home country of premeditated murder w/ exceptional cruelty after she tortured and threw her victim out a 9th story window, DHS tells @FoxNews. Victoria Sorocean fled to the U.S. to avoid a… pic.twitter.com/FmoJNUfywV — Bill Melugin (@BillMelugin_) November 11, 2025 The DHS noted she was first arrested by ICE under the Trump administration in 2020: In an attempt to evade a 17-year prison sentence, Sorocean fled to the United States. Under the first Trump Administration, ICE arrested her on January 10, 2020. Following her arrest, Sorocean engaged in various legal tactics to avoid removal, including filing multiple appeals with the Board of Immigration Appeals and seeking asylum. In 2022, Sorocean was released back into the country under the Biden administration. “It shocks the conscience that the Biden Administration released into America a cruel, violent illegal alien who tortured a human being, beat them with an electrical cable and a stick, and then threw her victim from a ninth-floor window,” said Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. “These are the types of barbaric criminal illegal aliens ICE is targeting every single day. 70% of all ICE arrests are of illegal aliens charged or convicted of a crime in the U.S. This does not even include foreign fugitives like this convicted murderer. Under President Trump and Secretary Noem, the world’s criminals are no longer welcome in the U.S.” This case highlights the failures of the previous administration which allowed millions of illegal aliens, including violent criminals and murderers like Sorocean, to roam free in American neighborhoods. ICE officers arrested Sorocean on November 4, 2025, and she will remain in ICE custody pending removal proceedings.

The therapy they called “quackery” might actually be one of nature’s most precise cancer-targeting systems. For more than half a century, the world has been taught to believe that chemotherapy—an indiscriminate chemical assault—is the only “real” way to fight cancer. However, nature quietly designed something far more intelligent and humane: Vitamin B17, also known as amygdalin or Laetrile. Unlike chemotherapy, which affects both healthy and diseased cells, B17 operates with extraordinary precision. It’s as if nature engineered her own form of selective chemotherapy—one that seeks out the problem, not the person. What Exactly Is Vitamin B17? Vitamin B17 is a naturally occurring compound found in more than 1,200 plants and foods. It’s mainly concentrated in Apricot Seeds, bitter almonds, millet, flaxseed, and certain beans and berries. Its key components—glucose, benzaldehyde, and bound cyanide—are what make it so misunderstood. The word cyanide triggers fear, yet in nature’s hands, it becomes part of an incredibly sophisticated design that distinguishes between healthy and cancerous cells. How Nature Engineered a Smart Weapon The brilliance of B17 lies in its dual-enzyme system: Cancer cells contain large amounts of an enzyme called beta-glucosidase. This enzyme breaks open the B17 molecule, releasing cyanide and benzaldehyde directly inside the tumor cell—destroying it from within. Healthy cells, by contrast, contain rhodanese, a protective enzyme that detoxifies cyanide by converting it into a harmless compound called thiocyanate. This means B17 only becomes toxic in the presence of cancer—and harmless everywhere else. It’s a self-targeting defense mechanism built into creation itself. Chemotherapy vs. Nature’s Precision Tool Chemotherapy is often described as a “necessary evil,” but it is blind in its attack. It destroys any rapidly dividing cell, whether cancerous or vital—such as hair follicles, the gut lining, and immune cells. That’s why nausea, exhaustion, and hair loss are common side effects. B17, by contrast, appears to be self-discriminating. Practitioners who have used Laetrile-based therapies report that patients often experience increased energy, improved appetite, and overall well-being compared to those undergoing conventional treatment. The difference isn’t just biochemical—it’s philosophical. One method declares war on the body. The other trusts it to heal. Cultures That Prove the Point Anthropologists studying traditional diets noticed a striking pattern: populations that consume nitriloside-rich foods—the plant compounds that contain B17—report astonishingly low cancer rates. The Hunza people of northern Pakistan, who regularly consume Apricot Seeds and millet, were famously noted by early explorers for their longevity and low incidence of cancer. Similar findings were observed among the Eskimo tribes and certain African and Native American groups. When these cultures adopted Westernized diets and abandoned their natural foods, cancer rates began to rise. Coincidence—or consequence? The Politics of Suppression When Laetrile began gaining attention in the 1970s, patients and doctors alike reported promising results. But instead of funding further studies, the FDA declared war on it—banning interstate sales and prosecuting physicians who used it. Pharmaceutical corporations had no incentive to defend it. A natural compound can’t be patented, so there’s no billion-dollar payoff. Meanwhile, media outlets—heavily funded by drug advertisers—parroted the message that Laetrile was “dangerous” or “unproven.” Yet thousands of patients continued seeking it across the border in Mexico, where clinics like Oasis of Hope Hospital still use Laetrile as part of comprehensive metabolic cancer care. What the Evidence Suggests Laboratory tests have shown that amygdalin can induce apoptosis (programmed cell death) in certain cancer cell lines. Animal research indicates anti-tumor activity, but these findings were often dismissed as “inconclusive.” Human studies, when conducted, were frequently designed with dosages or methods that virtually guaranteed failure—then cited as proof that Laetrile “didn’t work.” Even so, real-world accounts from patients and integrative doctors have persisted for decades, defying official narratives. A New Vision for Cancer Care If we stopped treating nature as the enemy, medicine could look very different. Instead of bombarding the body into remission, therapies could nourish, detoxify, and support its built-in intelligence. Vitamin B17 points toward that future—a gentler, targeted, and nutrition-based path that works with the body instead of against it. The question is not whether it deserves investigation, but whether those who profit from illness will ever allow it to be investigated. Want to Learn More? Download the Book, World Without Cancer: The Story of Vitamin B17 by G. Edward Griffin — Free PDF available. Explore Natural Options: Learn about Laetrile, B17, and Apricot Seeds at https://RNCstore.com/WLT. Join the Movement: Visit Operation World Without Cancer to support research, education, and advocacy for natural healing. Find a Wellness Provider: Visit B17works.com to connect with a certified Richardson Wellness Provider using the Dr. Richardson Wellness Method. Nature doesn’t make mistakes—only opportunities we’ve yet to understand. Vitamin B17 is one of them.

When firebrand commentator Ben Shapiro sat down with Joe Rogan, no one expected him to lob a grenade straight at Christianity. But that’s exactly what happened — and the fallout is spreading fast across America’s faith-based right. Asked [...] The post Ben Shapiro Turns on Christianity: Says Jesus Christ Was a Criminal, Not the Son of God appeared first on The People's Voice.

The Clinton Foundation was used by foreign and domestic actors to influence the policy decisions of Bill and Hillary Clinton.

The BBC is in dire straits.  The BBC is a state-funded enterprise in much the same way that NPR is a state-funded enterprise. The BBC has been the dominant broadcast platform in the United Kingdom for decades, going all the way back to World War II. For the last several decades, they have just been a left-wing agitprop organization. But now they are absolutely falling apart thanks to their extraordinarily dishonest attacks on President Trump. According to The Wall Street Journal: President Trump has threatened to file a $ 1 billion lawsuit against the BBC over the way the U.K. state broadcaster edited one of his speeches in a documentary last year. BBC Chairman Samir Shah apologized Monday for the controversy, which has plunged the broadcaster into crisis. The apology came a day after BBC Director-General Tim Davie and BBC News Chief Executive Deborah Turness said they were leaving the organization following criticism from the White House.  What happened? There was an episode from the BBC’s flagship investigative series called Panorama, which ran one week before the 2024 United States election. You may ask, did that affect the election? It doesn’t matter. The job of the BBC is to cover the news, not make the news up.  One week before the election, they ran a piece in which they spliced together things that President Trump said on January 6, 2021, to make it look as though he himself personally was leading an armed insurrection at the Capitol building. That was not true. In order to achieve this effect, they had to cut out 24 pages of material. They cut from one part of the speech, and then they fast-forwarded 50 minutes and cut together the last part of the speech to clip them together, and then basically put in ellipses in order to make it seem as though President Trump himself was personally calling on people to follow him to the Capitol building and to assault the Capitol building. If you watch that original clip, they had a music bed underneath, which connected the first part of the statement to the last part of the statement. It is not as though they had some sort of interpolation from a narrator explaining that much later in the speech, President Trump made the second part of the statement. The Journal continued: According to a letter from Trump’s lawyers, the BBC faces a legal claim for at least $1 billion unless the documentary is retracted, an apology published and compensation paid to the president. The letter set a deadline of Friday. The broadcaster said in a statement that it would “respond in due course.” This follows hard on a 19-page memo that was put out by a top staffer at the BBC named Michael Prescott. He was an independent adviser to the BBC’s Editorial Guidelines and Standards Board, and he wrote a 19-page memo pushing the idea that the BBC had become a biased and ridiculous organization. He wrote:  Dear Board Members, You may know that I have been one of the two independent external advisers working alongside the EGSC. I held this role for three years and stood down in the summer. I departed with profound and unresolved concerns about the BBC. Since leaving, I have thought long and hard about what, if anything, to do about this. My conclusion is that these concerns are serious enough for me to draw them to your attention, in your oversight role of the BBC. What follows is a summary of what were, in my view, some of the most troubling matters to come before the EGSC during my term. My view is that the Executive repeatedly failed to implement measures to resolve highlighted problems, and in many cases simply refused to acknowledge there was an issue at all.  Prescott pointed out that there was tremendous bias with regard to the U.S. election. He specifically pointed out that edit in the Panorama program. He said, “This was one of the most shocking sets of issues uncovered during my time with the EGSC. If BBC journalists are to be allowed to edit video in order to make people ‘say’ things they never actually said, then what value are the Corporation’s guidelines, why should the BBC be trusted, and where will this all end?”  And yet top members of the staff said, “There was no attempt to mislead the audience about the content or nature of Mr. Trump’s speech before the riot at the Capitol. It’s normal practice to edit speeches into short form clips.” These kinds of shenanigans occurred repeatedly. They did this with comments that President Trump made about Liz Cheney. There are reports in which the BBC routinely ignored its own guidelines, giving excessive coverage, for example, to that rogue Iowa poll that suggested that Kamala Harris was going to win the state by a substantial margin. Of course, President Trump won the state pretty easily. “During my time as an advisor to the EGSC it became clear the BBC fell too easily for putting out ill-researched material that suggested issues of racism when there were none,” Prescott wrote. Then he listed chapter and verse across the BBC in which they basically manufactured a bunch of racial issues where no racial issue existed. They went out of their way to promote idiocies about biological sex and gender. Prescott noted: I was told that time and time again the LGBTQ desk staffers would decline to cover any story raising difficult questions about the trans-debate. The allegation made to me was stark: that the desk had been captured by a small group of people promoting the Stonewall view of the debate and keeping other perspectives off-air. Individual programmes had come to lack their own reporters as a counterweight. …  There was also a constant drip-feed of one-sided stories, usually news features, celebrating the trans experience without adequate balance or objectivity. … There’s a constant drip feed of one sided stories, usually news features celebrating the trans experience without adequate balance or objectivity. One example of this might be a report that happened in 2024 from the BBC, in which they reported that male breast milk was just as nutritious for babies as female breast milk. You may be asking yourself, what is male breast milk? The answer is that if you pump men full of estrogen, you will get some secretions from the nipples that are not actually like female breast milk. But the BBC had an interest in pretending that males can become females. And so they ran with this report. This is what the BBC is. It’s true on a wide variety of issues. It’s particularly true about the Hamas-Israel war. According to the UK Telegraph, the BBC was forced to correct two stories every single week about the Gaza conflict since the October 7 attacks on Israel. That’s insane. How many stories can you retract before you finally lose all credibility? BBC Arabic had to make 215 corrections and clarifications over the past two years on stories that were found to be biased, inaccurate, or misleading. The BBC despises Israel, and it’s not possible for them to make it any clearer. For example, in November 2023, BBC editor Jeremy Bowen falsely reported that Israel had blown up the Al Ahli Hospital in the Gaza Strip. That wasn’t true. He later admitted he got it wrong, but said he didn’t feel bad at all that he got it wrong, saying, “I don’t regret one thing in my reporting, because I think, I think I was measured throughout. I didn’t race to judgment.”  Interviewer: “But you said that the building had been flattened.” Bowen replied, “Oh, yeah. Well, I got that wrong because I was looking at the pictures and like, what I could see was a square that appeared to be flaming on all sides. And there was a, you know, sort of a void in the middle. And it was, I think it was a picture taken from a drone. And so, you know, we have to piece together what we see. And I thought, ‘Well, that looks like the whole building’s gone.’ And that was my conclusion from looking at the pictures. And I was wrong on that. But I don’t feel too bad about that.” It doesn’t feel bad at all, because this is the way the BBC operates. They start with the conclusion, and then they backfill the news in order to reach that particular conclusion. So, is it any surprise that the BBC is a disaster area or that they’re in serious trouble now? It is long past time for the BBC to admit what it is, which is an agitprop organization on behalf of the political Left. They have been for decades. Nothing has changed. And this latest brouhaha is just more evidence that the government should not be subsidizing media organizations such as NPR, PBS, or the BBC in Britain, because you wind up with left-wing media sponsored by taxpayers.

Sunny Hostin spent part of Tuesday’s broadcast of “The View” scolding Senator John Fetterman (D-PA) for voting with Republicans to bring the longest government shutdown in history to an end — and he pushed right back. Hostin’s cohosts — most of whom have been pushing for Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s (D-NY) ouster since he “caved” and voted to avert the last potential government shutdown in March — began by pressing Fetterman on whether or not he believed Schumer was still the right person to lead the Senate under the current circumstances. WATCH: Sunny Hostin attacks Fetterman over his vote to end the shutdown and openly says Dems should bring GUNS to confront Republicans: “Senator Bernie Sanders said the vote was a horrific mistake. Governor Gavin Newsom called it pathetic and a surrender. Poll after poll found… pic.twitter.com/nqI0soObtR — Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) November 11, 2025 “Senator Bernie Sanders said the vote was a horrific mistake. Governor Gavin Newsom called it pathetic and a surrender. Poll after poll found Americans on both sides of the aisle blaming Republicans,” Hostin said. “Even Marjorie Taylor Greene blamed the GOP. As you mentioned, Democrats had big wins last week, so you had momentum. Why give in now? Why bring a butter knife to a gun fight?!” Hostin went on to argue that Fetterman was taking a major risk in trusting Republicans to follow through on promises to hold a vote on the Affordable Care Act subsidies and deliver back pay to furloughed federal workers, saying, “I believe you are wrong!” “Well, first of all, MTG is quite literally the last person in America that I’m going to take advice [from] or to get their kinds of leadership and values from,” Fetterman shot back. He went on to note that he had voted to keep the government open from the start, largely because he knew how a shutdown would impact people in his home state. “I promise you, this isn’t a political game. It is viewed [that way] by many of us, but the reality is, 42 million Americans now [are] not sure where their next meal is going to come from because we vote like that. Or people that haven’t been paid for five weeks now and that kinds of chaos. Those kinds of workers have to borrow more than half a billion dollars from their credit union just to pay the bills,” he said.

'This is not a campus that they are welcome at'

'About accountability'