YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #astronomy #newyork #physics #astrophysics #privacy #blackhole #keckobservatory #surveillance #facialrecognition #accretion #at2024wpp #lowresolutionimagingspectrometer #lris #nearinfraredechellettespectrograph #nires
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Install our *FREE* WEB APP! (PWA)
Night mode toggle
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

The Lighter Side
The Lighter Side
7 w

Former Inmate Who Received Contraband Book While in Solitary Has Now Built Hundreds of Prison Libraries
Favicon 
www.goodnewsnetwork.org

Former Inmate Who Received Contraband Book While in Solitary Has Now Built Hundreds of Prison Libraries

Reginald Betts was only 17 years and imprisoned in solitary confinement when the lifeline arrived that would change everything. Someone delivered a book. “Imagine yourself as a teenager, 17 years old, in solitary confinement, and you’re just calling out, ‘Yo, somebody send me a book,’” Betts, who’s now 45, told the Washington Post. “Somebody sent […] The post Former Inmate Who Received Contraband Book While in Solitary Has Now Built Hundreds of Prison Libraries appeared first on Good News Network.
Like
Comment
Share
Daily Signal Feed
Daily Signal Feed
7 w

Enforcing Immigration Laws Is Not the Moral Equivalent of the Holocaust
Favicon 
www.dailysignal.com

Enforcing Immigration Laws Is Not the Moral Equivalent of the Holocaust

Whence cometh the conviction, in America and even more in Britain and Europe, that open borders is the only moral immigration policy? Of course, not everyone believes that, and many who do stop short of saying so. But the contrast between the rhetoric and policies of the first two decades of the century and those that have prevailed since President Donald Trump’s election is unmistakable. Former Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama, like the George Bushes, professed to want to enforce immigration laws. They decried the flood of illegals that crested in the prosperous decade before the financial crisis, and afterward saw with relief that the flow of illegals slowed. As I wrote recently, careful projections of the illegal population estimate that it peaked at about 12 million in 2007, fell to about 10.5 million in 2019, then increased by about 4 million during the Joe Biden administration, which essentially opened the borders to the point of paying for illegals to live in New York’s Roosevelt Hotel, two short blocks from where Jamie Dimon’s JPMorganChase was constructing its $3 billion office tower. The impetus for this policy came from something other than the usual elite economic argument that, as population growth is slowing, advanced countries need more workers to maintain economic growth. That something else can be summarized in the phrase “Orange Man Bad.” If Trump wants to stop people at the border, then we shouldn’t stop anyone there. There is another element here, seen more prominently in Europe. And that is the conviction that barring people from your country who are different, in ancestry or customs, from the preexisting population is invidious discrimination. Immigrants to the United States over the past half-century have come mostly from Latin America and Asia from countries that to varying degrees share religious orientations, market economic norms, and cultures of literacy and numeracy with most Americans. It’s likely true that a flood of mostly illegal immigrants, like those welcomed by the Biden administration, will tend to have a higher proportion of violent migrants than among legal immigrants. And a higher proportion of arrivals with adversarial attitudes toward American mores, traditions and government. But that is a problem orders of magnitude greater in Britain and Europe, where very much larger shares of immigrants, from Africa, the Middle East and South Asia, are Muslims. Many are quite ready to assimilate to European mores. But many—especially the floods welcome by former German Chancellor Angela Merkel starting in 2015—are not. They want to impose their religion and their culture on the host society, and elite leaders of such nations have been willing to let them do so. An example is the scandal of Britain’s “grooming gangs,” often long-settled immigrants from Pakistan and Afghanistan, who sexually abuse and enslave adolescent working-class English girls. For at least two decades, this oppression has been largely ignored by Britain’s political parties, local and national police forces, national press, and certainly by the TV-set-owner subsidized BBC. This oppression of women and violation of human rights is virtually unknown to American liberals, as the liberal talk show host Bill Maher has pointed out with appropriate indignation. Nor are they aware, despite mention of the practice, that Britain has been arresting thousands of citizens for social media posts that are thought to hurt immigrants’ feelings. European elites, in government and the press, have suppressed news of immigrant violence, even when directed at women and gays. Both center-right and center-left governments have professed themselves unable to reduce the flow of immigrants with cultural attitudes adversarial to European norms. They profess they must obey rulings by international courts and agencies whose personnel are immune to democratic checks. Political parties that campaign for restrictions on immigration are treated as pariahs with which established parties must never allow in coalition governments. This includes Britain’s Reform party, which currently has huge poll leads, and France’s Rassemblement National, whose leader, Marine Le Pen, was blocked from running by a dubious court decision. But her 30-year-old deputy, Jordan Bartella, appears more popular than other parties’ leaders. Germany’s AfD, which is currently tied in the polls, is treated with particular scorn by the two main parties, which, between them, capture less than 50% in polls. Within AfD’s ranks are some with nostalgia for Germany’s Nazi past, and the nation’s leading parties deserve respect for their longstanding commitment to renouncing Nazism and making reparations for the Holocaust. But it’s not apparent that AfD’s policy of restricting the inflow of immigrants, or those of Eastern European democracies like Poland and Hungary, which are decried by unelected European Union leaders, is the moral equivalent of Nazism. Excluding people with different cultures and attitudes from your country is not the moral equivalent of murdering all your Jews. Those leaders who treat the two as morally equivalent are captive to bad ideas. They have been taught to divide the world into oppressors and the oppressed, to cast immigrants as virtuous victims and their own citizens as culpable oppressors. They have been instructed to see colonialism not as a limited chapter in history but as its dominant theme, and to treat its harms as a kind of second Holocaust. From these delusions, most ordinary Americans, including recent legal immigrants and their offspring, and large numbers of ordinary Britons and Europeans, seem happily immune. Perhaps in time, their common sense will dissuade the elites of their “luxury belief” in open borders. COPYRIGHT 2025 CREATORS.COM We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post Enforcing Immigration Laws Is Not the Moral Equivalent of the Holocaust appeared first on The Daily Signal.
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
7 w

'CBS Saturday Morning' Concludes With German Author Comparing US To East Germany
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

'CBS Saturday Morning' Concludes With German Author Comparing US To East Germany

Before CBS Saturday Morning officially headed off into its uncertain future, co-host Michelle Miller used her final episode to interview German author Daniel Kehlmann about his recent novel about G.W. Pabst, the silent film director who originally fled the Nazis only to return and make propaganda movies. Naturally, much of the conversation was about life in a dictatorship, but unnaturally, towards the end of their conversation, Kehlmann would compare the current United States to the East Germany his wife grew up in, and Miller offered up little resistance to the crazy idea. Miller declared that “Kehlmann splits his time between Berlin and New York with his teenage son and his wife, an international human rights lawyer who grew up under East Germany's communist rule. For them, this subject feels very personal.”     Kehlmann insisted that “she sees a lot of what she experienced in her childhood in the GDR happening in America now.” Miller could only shake her head and weakly offer, “A lot of people would disagree.” Doubling down, Kehlmann proclaimed that, “I mean, what I would say to that is it really depends where and who you are. For us, visa holders, free speech is practically suspended. Our lawyers are telling us 'be very careful, they can take away your visa, so don't go to demonstrations,' don't say, for example, what I just said to you.” As the duo laughed at the last part, Miller wondered, “Why are you saying what you just said to me?” “Well, because someone has to. Someone has to,” Kehlmann insisted. One annoying aspect of comparing Trump’s America to East Germany or Nazi Germany is the sense that the people making the analogy don’t actually believe it. Despite the timing of CBS’s interview, Kehlmann’s book has been out for months, and he’s done plenty of interviews where either he or his host suggested or flat out declared the U.S. is in a similarly dark place. Ironically, the reason Miller interviewed Kehlmann now was because he was in New York to be honored by the New York Public Library because despite all his warnings about not having free speech, he keeps speaking, and nothing bad has happened to him. Here is a transcript for the November 22 show: CBS Saturday Morning 11/22/2025 8:49 AM ET MICHELLE MILLER: Kehlmann splits his time between Berlin and New York with his teenage son and his wife, an international human rights lawyer who grew up under East Germany's communist rule. For them, this subject feels very personal. DANIEL KEHLMANN: She sees a lot of what she experienced in her childhood in the GDR happening in America now. MILLER: A lot of people would disagree. KEHLMANN: I mean, what I would say to that is it really depends where and who you are. For us, visa holders, free speech is practically suspended. Our lawyers are telling us "be very careful, they can take away your visa, so don't go to demonstrations," don't say, for example, what I just said to you. MILLER: Why are you saying what you just said to me? KEHLMANN: Well, because someone has to. Someone has to.
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
7 w

Justice Alito delivers win to Texas GOP, temporarily restores Republican congressional map
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Justice Alito delivers win to Texas GOP, temporarily restores Republican congressional map

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito delivered Texas Republicans some good news on Friday, temporarily reinstating the Republican-friendly congressional map they passed in August.After Texas Republicans surmounted weeks of obstruction by their Democratic colleagues, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott ultimately signed the "One Big Beautiful Map into law" on Aug. 29, leaving the Lone Star Sate with a congressional map that could net the GOP five extra seats in the midterm elections.'Radical left-wing activists are abusing the judicial system to derail the Republican agenda and steal the U.S. House.'However, the adoption of the new map prompted hand-wringing among liberals and a successful Democratic gerrymandering campaign in California — as well as a legal challenge from several race-based groups of plaintiffs led by the League of United Latin American Citizens.The plaintiffs alleged in their complaint that the map was the result of unconstitutional racial gerrymandering and asked a three-judge panel of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas to block use of the map for the 2026 elections.The court on Tuesday ruled 2-1 in favor of the liberal advocacy groups, finding that the challengers likely would be able to prove that it was racially gerrymandered.RELATED: Yet another state's districts found to be racist, resulting in new map for 2026 midterms Photo by Brandon Bell/Getty Images "The public perception of this case is that it’s about politics," wrote Judge Jeffrey Brown in the ruling. "To be sure, politics played a role in drawing the 2025 Map. But it was much more than just politics. Substantial evidence shows that Texas racially gerrymandered the 2025 Map."California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) was among the liberals who celebrated the ruling, noting that "Donald Trump and Greg Abbott played with fire, got burned — and democracy won. This ruling is a win for Texas, and for every American who fights for free and fair elections."But the celebration proved premature as Abbott and other Texas officials promptly appealed the decision to the Supreme Court.Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said in a statement, "Radical left-wing activists are abusing the judicial system to derail the Republican agenda and steal the U.S. House for Democrats. I am fighting to stop this blatant attempt to upend our political system."Justice Alito stayed the lower court's ruling Friday and gave GOP map opponents until Monday to respond to his order.The Republican map is back in play pending the outcome of the state's appeal before the high court.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
7 w

Islamist groups in Texas rake in $13M in taxpayer-funded grants amid Abbott’s battle against Sharia law
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Islamist groups in Texas rake in $13M in taxpayer-funded grants amid Abbott’s battle against Sharia law

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) has taken aggressive action this week against Sharia law, the Muslim Brotherhood, and the Council on American-Islamic Relations. Yet critics are demanding to know why, during his time in office, millions in taxpayer-funded grants have been allocated to alleged Islamist organizations based in Texas.Abbott announced on Tuesday that he had designated the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR as foreign terrorist and transnational criminal organizations. The following day, Abbott urged local district attorneys to investigate potential Sharia "courts" operating in Texas and defying state and federal laws to push Islamic codes. 'Unlike the previous administration, recipients of grants will no longer be permitted to use federal funds to ... empower radical organizations with unseemly ties that don't serve the interest of the American people.'Despite Abbott's recent actions, some have faulted the governor for allowing taxpayer dollars to be used to fund the uptick in Islamic mosques in Texas, citing a June report from the Middle East Forum. The article claimed Texas gave "over $13 million of federal and state monies to mosques and community groups aligned with Islamist movements such as Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, and Jamaat-e-Islami, as well as hostile foreign regimes."Of the 18 organizations that received funds, a dozen were said to have "extremist links.""While a few thousand dollars in the state government's data consists of the return of escheated funds, the vast majority of the millions spent appear to be the result of direct state grants, subsidy programs, and federal sub-awards managed by the Texas state government," the Middle East Forum wrote.The Texas governor's office told Blaze News that the funding referenced in the Middle East Forum's report was not state tax dollars but rather federal funds distributed by the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency's Nonprofit Security Grant Program.As part of that program, since 2016, roughly $63 million in federal funds have passed through Texas to nonprofit organizations, including $55 million to churches and synagogues, and a smaller portion went to mosques, according to Abbott's office.RELATED: Secret Sharia ‘courts’ in Texas may be quietly overriding state law — Abbott calls for investigation Photo by RONALDO SCHEMIDT/AFP via Getty ImagesThe governor's office contended that organization-vetting for this DHS and FEMA grant program is performed by these federal agencies, not by the state.Sam Westrop, the director of Islamist Watch and the author of the Middle East Forum report, disputed this claim, arguing that the state was responsible for screening these grant applications and had the authority to exclude applicants.Westrop told Blaze News that "only a small number" of the $13 million came from the DHS' Nonprofit Security Grant Program."However, many of the grants we identified, while not all from DHS, were in fact paid for from federal funds; and are thus subawards," Westrop stated. "But by serving as the primary grantee, the Texas state government is required by the federal government to vet and assess risk. Subawards are discretionary, and the primary grantee may exclude a subawardee.""So these grants may be financed by federal dollars, but the monies are distributed through and at the discretion of the Texas state government, much by the governor's office itself," Westrop added.The Nonprofit Security Grant Program seeks to provide financial support to nonprofit organizations that are considered "high risk" of a terrorist attack. These nonprofits can include places of worship, educational facilities, and medical facilities, among other 501(c)(3) organizations. The funds are intended to support security enhancements, such as installing cameras, alarms, and fences. The grant can also be used toward security planning and training, as well as cybersecurity.RELATED: No Sharia law in Texas: Abbott draws a hard line against radical Islam Photo by Ilana Panich-Linsman for The Washington Post via Getty ImagesAccording to FEMA, the State Administrative Agency in each state is "the only eligible applicant" for this grant and "responsible for handling the federal award." Therefore, churches and other places of worship seeking funds through the Nonprofit Security Grant Program are "subapplicants that must apply through the SAA in the state or territory where the applying facility is physically located." The nonprofits cannot apply directly to FEMA.The applications are first "scored by the SAA in coordination with its state." Then the SAA submits "a prioritized list of [investment justifications] with all scores to FEMA."FEMA notes that a facility's local SAA may have its own requirements to apply for the grant. Texas' SAA contact is the Homeland Security Grants Division under the Texas Office of the Governor.These now-archived grant opportunities from Texas' eGrants website state that the "Office of the Governor will screen all applications to ensure that they meet the requirements included in the funding announcement." However, it notes that FEMA "makes final funding decisions."While it remains disputed whether Texas could have blocked these grants from going to alleged Islamist organizations, FEMA has made it clear that the DHS, under Secretary Kristi Noem, has significantly increased the vetting at the federal level."Under Secretary Noem's leadership, FEMA conducted a critical evaluation of all grant programs and recipients to root out waste, fraud, and abuse and deliver accountability for the American taxpayer," a FEMA spokesperson told Blaze News. "For Fiscal Year 2025 grant awards, DHS and FEMA worked together to vet grant recipients and ensure that every dollar spent strengthens the nation's resilience.""Unlike the previous administration, recipients of grants will no longer be permitted to use federal funds to house illegal immigrants at luxury hotels, fund climate change pet projects, or empower radical organizations with unseemly ties that don't serve the interest of the American people," the spokesperson added.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
National Review
National Review
7 w

No, Ken Burns, the United States Is Not an Iroquois Nation 
Favicon 
www.nationalreview.com

No, Ken Burns, the United States Is Not an Iroquois Nation 

The Founders didn’t model us on the Six Nations, and George Washington didn’t tomahawk a Frenchman. 
Like
Comment
Share
Twitchy Feed
Twitchy Feed
7 w

REALLY? Sen. Elissa Slotkin Wants to Know 'What's Going on With Trump's Military Purge?'
Favicon 
twitchy.com

REALLY? Sen. Elissa Slotkin Wants to Know 'What's Going on With Trump's Military Purge?'

REALLY? Sen. Elissa Slotkin Wants to Know 'What's Going on With Trump's Military Purge?'
Like
Comment
Share
RedState Feed
RedState Feed
7 w

Two More Biden-Commuted Death Row Inmates Now Headed for Supermax
Favicon 
redstate.com

Two More Biden-Commuted Death Row Inmates Now Headed for Supermax

Two More Biden-Commuted Death Row Inmates Now Headed for Supermax
Like
Comment
Share
Trending Tech
Trending Tech
7 w

2 ChatGPT Tips That Can Help Boost Your Salary
Favicon 
www.bgr.com

2 ChatGPT Tips That Can Help Boost Your Salary

Learn 2 key tips to boost your salary using ChatGPT. This guide shows how to use AI to find a new job or get a raise, plus what data you must avoid sharing.
Like
Comment
Share
Trending Tech
Trending Tech
7 w

You Can Store Your Car Keys On Your iPhone - Here's How
Favicon 
www.bgr.com

You Can Store Your Car Keys On Your iPhone - Here's How

Your iPhone can do more than text and tap-to-pay - it can now unlock and start your car. Here's how Apple's digital key is changing everyday driving.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 5987 out of 105836
  • 5983
  • 5984
  • 5985
  • 5986
  • 5987
  • 5988
  • 5989
  • 5990
  • 5991
  • 5992
  • 5993
  • 5994
  • 5995
  • 5996
  • 5997
  • 5998
  • 5999
  • 6000
  • 6001
  • 6002
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund