This August 11 is the 10th anniversary of the death of Robin Williams, the most beloved comedian to come out of the new America unleashed by the ’60s, entertaining the country for more than 40 years through a number of changes in genre and medium. Continue Reading...

by Niamh Harris, The Peoples Voice: President Trumps running mate has called out Kamala Harris and Democrats for supporting sexually explicit books in libraries. Senator JD Vance called Democrats “weird” for fighting to keep pornographic books available to kids in libraries during a rally with President Donald Trump in Atlanta on Saturday TRUTH LIVES on […]

by Michael Snyder, The Economic Collapse Blog: It is getting very difficult to ignore all of the shaking that is going on.  Over the past few months, there have been very unusual earthquakes all over the United States.  As you will see below, there have been noteworthy quakes on the west coast, on the east […]

from Bannons War Room: TRUTH LIVES on at https://sgtreport.tv/

Make room in your freezer, Pisces. READ MORE...

I was convinced beyond a moral doubt: Life begins at conception. But my conviction was more instinctual than cerebral. Then I began to think. I could be wrong. There are simple answers to most complex questions about life, but they are often wrong. Moreover, who crowned me with the authority to decide for others when life begins? Complications and quandaries immediately appear. If life begins at conception, then every abortion is murder—the intentional taking of a human life. All who assist abortions could also be criminally prosecuted for aiding and abetting murder. That would mean millions of murder prosecutions annually. There can be no exceptions, even for rape, incest, or to save the life of the mother. Embryos, after all, are morally pure and free of sin. They have not yet had an opportunity to enjoy life outside the womb. The mother may have done nothing wrong but at least has enjoyed more life than the embryo. In other words, the embryo seems more deserving of life than the mother by any moral metric. The U.S. Constitution would prohibit any state from permitting abortion. The 14th Amendment prohibits the taking of life without due process of law. And an embryo is as innocent as a lamb. Is that what the authors of the amendment intended? Abortions were common in 1868, when the amendment was ratified. Further, fathers would be liable, from the moment of conception, for child support to mothers to optimize their health care, including costs of doctor and hospital checkups. This would diminish the probability of birth of a newborn with defects or handicaps. Courts would need to appoint guardians at the time of conception to control the mother’s behavior and nutrition to promote the birth of the embryo with maximum health and vigor. The father would be required to pay for the guardian as part of child support. The Constitution requires a census of all “persons” every 10 years to determine the allocation of seats in the House of Representatives among the states. If personhood begins at conception, census takers would need to test women to determine whether they are pregnant for an accurate count. The constitutional mandate of one person, one vote in drawing congressional, state, and municipal election districts would also require testing females within district boundaries for pregnancy. Pregnant females would be entitled to the child income tax credit for embryos or fetuses, which would be doubled or tripled if twins or triplets were anticipated. IRS auditors would be required to test the females claiming a child income tax credit for pregnancy and further proof if twins or triplets were claimed. The law permits the use of deadly force to prevent any person from killing another. If abortion is the murder of an unborn human life, then mothers seeking abortions and persons aiding them could be killed under the doctrine of defending the life of another. Section 1 of the 14th Amendment confers U.S. citizenship on “persons born in the United States,” but not on unborn embryos or fetuses. Is Section 1 itself unconstitutional because it arbitrarily treats born and unborn children differently? If frozen embryos are unborn children, then discarding them is first-degree murder. The Alabama Supreme Court recently ruled that frozen embryos (i.e., unborn children) possess the same rights as born children. Killing either the unborn or born is murder. Pro-choice advocates deny that life begins at conception. But who gave them that power? Not the U.S. Constitution. The law decides if life begins at conception. And the Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision entrusts the decision to the states. The Constitution permits states to punish abortion as murder, to permit abortion on demand, or choose something in between. Neither the Constitution nor law empowers scientists to decide when life begins, although legislators may consult their views in making the decision. A scientific paper published in 2021 examined the findings of 5,577 biologists. An overwhelming percentage (5,337 biologists) maintained that life begins during fertilization of the egg. Legislators would be wise to consider their views as well as the views of philosophers or clerics in defining when life begins. There are no easy answers here. The U.S. Supreme Court’s Dobbs decision jump-started pro-choice advocacy, which had atrophied since the heyday of Roe v. Wade. Since then, the six states that have held referenda on abortion have all yielded pro-choice results: California, Michigan, Ohio, Vermont, Kentucky, and Kansas. This year, up to 12 states may have abortion measures on the ballot, seeking to either affirm that their state constitutions protect the right to abortion or that nothing in them confers such a right. Maybe the best answer to the question of when life begins is, “It depends.” COPYRIGHT 2024 CREATORS.COM We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal. The post Does Life Begin at Conception? Science Has a Voice appeared first on The Daily Signal.