Donald Trump said Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) should be prosecuted for insider trading. “Nancy Pelosi has a little problem because her husband sold their Visa stock, they had a lot of Visa stock, one day before Visa was announced that Visa’s being sued by the Department of Justice,” Trump said. “Nancy Pelosi sold vast amounts of Visa stock one day before the big lawsuit that we all read about a few days ago was brought against Visa,” he continued. “Nancy Pelosi should be prosecuted for that,” he added. WATCH: #BREAKING: President Trump has just called on Nancy Pelosi to be PROSECUTED for insider trading HELL yes! Pelosi and her husband just made MILLIONS dumping Visa stock immediately before the DOJ decided to pursue action against them, causing the stock to rank. This… pic.twitter.com/b0KWnF4foj — Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) September 26, 2024 From the New York Post: The former House speaker’s husband, Paul Pelosi, unloaded 2,000 shares of Visa stock worth between $500,000 and $1 million on July 1, financial disclosures show. On Tuesday, less than three months after the massive transaction, Visa was hit with a DOJ lawsuit alleging that the company illegally monopolized the debit card market. Trump, 78, suggested that Nancy was aware of the looming lawsuit and tipped off Paul before he dumped the stock. BREAKING: Former President Trump has just called on Nancy Pelosi to be prosecuted for insider trading. pic.twitter.com/y36eaxnKTX — Leading Report (@LeadingReport) September 26, 2024 “Trump called out the story we broke yesterday,” X account ‘Nancy Pelosi Stock Tracker’ wrote. “To be clear, she sold a couple months before the DOJ lawsuit, not a day before But his point still remains, it’s a very bad look And why we’ll keep calling her out,” it added. LFG Trump called out the story we broke yesterday To be clear, she sold a couple months before the DOJ lawsuit, not a day before But his point still remains, it’s a very bad look And why we’ll keep calling her out https://t.co/EwylPpyw3Q — Nancy Pelosi Stock Tracker (@PelosiTracker_) September 26, 2024 BREAKING : The DOJ plans to open up a lawsuit against Visa saying they illegally monopolized the US debit card market Pelosi sold ~$1 Million dollars of Visa $V just 2 months ago Wild. — Nancy Pelosi Stock Tracker (@PelosiTracker_) September 24, 2024 “Christopher Josephs, the tech entrepreneur who runs the ‘Nancy Pelosi Stock Tracker’ on X, posted a screenshot of a congressional filing on July 3 which showed that the former House speaker’s husband, Paul Pelosi, had sold 2,000 shares of Visa worth between $500,000 and $1 million,” the New York Post noted. BREAKING: Pelosi is back on the Trading Desk She just bought ~$5M of Broadcom $AVGO and another $1.2M of Nvidia $NVDA She also sold ~$500K of Tesla and ~$536K of Visa $V pic.twitter.com/RGQoG4oW3F — Nancy Pelosi Stock Tracker (@PelosiTracker_) July 3, 2024 * Image from Nancy Pelosi Stock Tracker X Post * The New York Post noted: The disclosure form shows that Pelosi’s transaction is marked “SP,” or spouse — a reference to husband Paul, the San Francisco-based venture capitalist and real estate investor. At the time Paul Pelosi sold Visa stock, there was no public indication that an antitrust lawsuit against the company was imminent. Shares of Visa closed down 5.5% at $272.78. “Speaker Pelosi does not own any stocks, and she has no prior knowledge or subsequent involvement in any transactions,” the congresswoman’s spokesperson told The Post. Nevertheless, critics have claimed that Nancy Pelosi’s perch in Washington gives her potential access to non-public information that is relevant to the markets. “At various critical inflection points in history, members of our government have engaged in trading at a time which their conflicts are called into question,” Ron Geffner, a former enforcement attorney with the Securities and Exchange Commission, told The Post.

Dan Cleary, who teched for Jane’s Addiction for 17 years, has spoken about the onstage altercation that caused the rockers’ indefinite hiatus earlier this month

In 2010, Stone Sour released their third album Audio Secrecy – and finally shook off the ‘side project’ tag

California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a formal apology on Thursday for the state’s “role” in slavery just one day after the governor vetoed two reparations bills. Assembly Bill 3089, which Newsom signed, mandated that the state offer a formal apology along with memorializing the apology in a plaque on the state Capitol, the Los Angeles Times reported. Slavery was never legal in California after it became a state in 1850, but some argue that the state’s laws allowed slave owners to keep slaves even after the practice was outlawed in California’s 1849 Constitution. “The State of California accepts responsibility for the role we played in promoting, facilitating, and permitting the institution of slavery, as well as its enduring legacy of persistent racial disparities,” Newsom said in a statement. “Building on decades of work, California is now taking another important step forward in recognizing the grave injustices of the past — and making amends for the harms caused.” Democrat Assemblymember Reggie Jones-Sawyer added, “Healing can only begin with an apology. The State of California acknowledges its past actions and is taking this bold step to correct them, recognizing its role in hindering the pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness for Black individuals through racially motivated punitive laws.” The apology, however, doesn’t take any steps toward reparations as Democrats in California take heat from reparations advocates for the lack of progress on the issue, the LA Times reported. California was the first state in the nation to appoint a reparations task force. On Wednesday, Newsom vetoed two reparations bills, one of which would have allowed black Californians to reclaim or be compensated for property that was taken by the government through eminent domain decades ago, according to the Associated Press. Am I Racist? Is In Theaters NOW — Get Your Tickets Here! Newsom said that if he had signed the bill, it would not have gone into full effect because lawmakers previously blocked another piece of legislation to create an agency tasked with reviewing reparations claims. “I thank the author for his commitment to redressing past racial injustices. However, this bill tasks a nonexistent state agency to carry out its various provisions and requirements, making it impossible to implement,” Newsom stated. The second reparations bill vetoed by Newsom would have expanded California’s Medicaid program to include medically supported food and nutrition. The governor argued that the bill “would result in significant and ongoing general fund costs for the Medi-Cal program that are not included in the budget.”

The left still talks nonstop about nonexistent 2016 Trump-Russia 'collusion'

It has ruined his legacy...