The woke Bishop who slammed Donald Trump during the National Prayer Service this morning is a social justice radical, and the President was set up. The Progressive Democrats continue their unethical attacks. During her sermon at the National Prayer Service today, she ridiculously claimed illegal foreigners and trans children fear for their lives with Donald […] The post Woke Bishop at National Prayer Service Set Trump Up appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

NBC News reports that Senators received an affidavit Tuesday from the former sister-in-law of defense secretary nominee Pete Hegseth. She says his behavior caused his second wife to fear for her safety. The affidavit was received after Senate Armed Services Committee staffers were in contact with Hegseth’s former sister-in-law for several days. The former sister-in-law, […] The post Hegseth Ex-Sister-in-Law Says 2nd Wife Feared Him: Wife Denies appeared first on www.independentsentinel.com.

Charlamagne tha God torched those upset about the rappers who performed during the various inauguration events for President Donald Trump. During “The Breakfast Club” on Tuesday, the radio host blasted people who slammed rappers like Nelly and Snoop Dogg for being part of the inauguration celebrations ahead of Trump’s swearing-in — but made no comment about the Democrats who were there for the festivities as well. “The hypocrisy that people display in regards to who they like and don’t like is mind-blowing to me,” Charlamagne said.  “Like, there is no way you are more mad at rappers for performing at these inauguration events than you are at the elected officials who told us Trump was a ‘fascist,’ a ‘threat to democracy,’ a ‘danger to our country and the Constitution,’” he added. “They likened him to Hitler, but then folks like [Joe Biden] just welcomed him back in the White House.” CELEBRATE #47 WITH 47% OFF DAILYWIRE+ MEMBERSHIPS + A FREE $20 GIFT “[Barack Obama] was sharing a good laugh with him at the funeral of President [Jimmy] Carter,” the host continued. “We know why the rappers did what they did. We know why they’re doing it. They got paid. What’s the politicians’ excuse for normalizing Trump?” The host said if you are going to blast the rappers, those same people should be blowing up on Biden, Obama, and “all the other elected officials who got us all riled up and scared only to turn around and have tea with a man they likened to Hitler.” Charlamagne tha God said any attacks on Snoop and Nelly were “inconsequential” compared to Biden and Obama, who he said “played in our faces. That’s just my personal opinion.” The host recently made headlines when he slammed liberals who he said were celebrating the sentencing of Trump in his hush money trial, as previously reported. During his radio show, the host said that liberals were being ridiculous for making more out of the sentencing by Judge Juan Merchan in the New York case — related to hush money paid to Stephanie Clifford, a porn actress who goes by the name Stormy Daniels — than they should. “What a waste of time. I mean, what a waste of time. Pure political theater,” he said. “They was never, ever going to convict a former or sitting president of nothing.” “And what was even more ridiculous was watching liberals celebrate this,” he added. “Like, this is not a win. Who cares if you can call him a convicted felon when you still got to call him president for the next four years? Who cares?” Related: Charlamagne Tha God Slams Liberals For Celebrating Trump Sentencing

On Monday, his first day in office, President Trump issued an executive order which stated that the United States government would not give citizenship to a child whose mother had emigrated to the country illegally and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident at the time of the child’s birth or if the mother’s presence was lawful but temporary and the father was not a United States citizen or lawful permanent resident. On Tuesday, 22 states with Democrat attorneys general sued Trump over the order. The executive order noted that the Fourteenth Amendment states: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside.” But, the order added, “The Fourteenth Amendment has never been interpreted to extend citizenship universally to everyone born within the United States.  The Fourteenth Amendment has always excluded from birthright citizenship persons who were born in the United States but not ‘subject to the jurisdiction thereof.’” The attorneys general filed their complaint in Federal District Court in Massachusetts, the cities of San Francisco and Washington, D.C., joined in the effort, The New York Times reported. New Jersey’s attorney general, Matthew J. Platkin, complained, “Presidents are powerful, but he is not a king. He cannot rewrite the Constitution with a stroke of the pen.” CELEBRATE #47 WITH 47% OFF DAILYWIRE+ MEMBERSHIPS + A FREE $20 GIFT The ACLU also immediately filed a lawsuit challenging the executive order, prompting Harrison Fields, White House principal deputy press secretary, to respond, “Radical Leftists can either choose to swim against the tide and reject the overwhelming will of the people, or they can get on board and work with President Trump to advance his wildly popular agenda. These lawsuits are nothing more than an extension of the Left’s resistance – and the Trump administration is ready to face them in court.” As far back as 2015, National Review noted, “According to Center for Immigration Studies (CIS) legal policy analyst Jon Feere, who testified before the House Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Immigration and Border Security in April, between 350,000 and 400,000 children are born annually to an illegal-alien mother residing in the United States — as many as one in ten births nationwide. As of 2010, four out of five children of illegal aliens residing in the U.S. were born here — some 4 million kids.” “The 14th Amendment doesn’t say that all persons born in the U.S. are citizens. It says that ‘[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof’ are citizens,” Hans von Spakovsky of the Heritage Foundation has written. “That second, critical, conditional phrase is conveniently ignored or misinterpreted by advocates of ‘birthright’ citizenship. Critics erroneously believe that anyone present in the United States has ‘subjected” himself’ to the jurisdiction” of the United States, which would extend citizenship to the children of tourists, diplomats, and illegal aliens alike. But that is not what that qualifying phrase means. Its original meaning refers to the political allegiance of an individual and the jurisdiction that a foreign government has over that individual.”