Climate of Hate? Cab Driver Attempts to Run Down Students at Jewish School

In a heart-pounding race against time, a heavily pregnant pit bull named Mama Stormi was rescued from a shelter just 47 minutes before she was scheduled for euthanasia. The shelter operated under a strict 3 PM deadline, meaning anyone who wanted to save her was up against the clock. Lisa, a dedicated rescuer, and Karla,... The post Heavily pregnant pit bull is rescued 47 minutes before her time is up appeared first on Animal Channel.

Democrats and their allies in the liberal media launched a smear campaign against Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito earlier this month in an effort to prompt his recusal from upcoming cases related to former President Donald Trump and the Jan. 6 protests. Jodi Kantor, running lead on the initiative for the New York Times, failed to land a decisive blow with her May 16 flag story, which the Washington Post had years earlier wrote off as a nothing-burger. Meatless, but desperate for results, Kantor found another flag to concern-monger about: the "Appeal to Heaven" flag, also known as the Pine Tree Flag, which had apparently been flown above Alito's beach house in New Jersey last year. This line of attack proved similarly ineffective. Alito told Democrat Senators Dick Durbin of Illinois and Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island that he personally flew neither flag and that he would not be recusing himself, prompting Democrats to rage impotently. Democratic lawmakers' feelings and the New York Times' remaining credibility were not the only casualties in the unsuccessful smear campaign. The offending "Appeal to Heaven" flag has effectively been transmogrified in the popular liberal imagination from a patriotic banner — designed by an aide-de-camp to then-General George Washington and flown by proud Americans ever since — to a loathsome symbol of an imagined wrong. It has 'since been adopted by a different group — one that doesn't represent the city's values.' The "Appeal to Heaven" flag was one among a collection of 18 flags reflecting different moments in American history flown in Civic Center Plaza outside San Francisco City Hall. According to the SFist, despite being flown for 60 years with "zero controversy," the flag has been removed by the city's Recreation and Park Department. The flag's fate appears to have been sealed not only by its presence among the myriad of different banners present at the Capitol on Jan. 6 but on account of is recent association in the Times with a Supreme Court justice detested by the left. City parks officials told the San Francisco Chronicle in a statement that whereas the flag originally signified the "quest for American independence," it has "since been adopted by a different group — one that doesn't represent the city's values." The "Appeal to Heaven" flag has been replaced by an American flag, which also appeared at Justice Alito's home and at the Capitol on Jan. 6. The flag's removal comes just days after users on social media indicated Democrats were effectively whipping stones at Alito from a glass house and months after a Palestinian flag was sent up a pole at the Golden Gate Bridge. According to the U.S. National Park Service, the "Appeal to Heaven" flag "became familiar on the seas as the ensign of the cruisers commissioned by General Washington and was noted by many English newspapers of the time." Republican Illinois state Rep. Chris Miller's office noted years before the flag became controversial: The pine tree had long been a New England symbol being depicted on the Flag of New England flown by colonial merchant ships dating back to 1686. Leading up to the Revolutionary War it became a symbol of Colonial ire and resistance. The colonists resented the restrictions on the timber used for their needs and livelihoods. Prohibitions were disregarded and they practiced 'Swamp Law,' where the pines were harvested according to their needs regardless of statutes. In New Hampshire enforcement led to the Pine Tree Riot in 1772, one of the first acts of forceful protest against British policies. It occurred almost two years prior to the more well-known Boston Tea Party protest and three years before open hostilities began at the Battles of Lexington and Concord. The pine tree was also used on the flag that the Colonists flew at the Battle of Bunker Hill in June 1775. The flag was subsequently adopted by the Massachusetts Navy and used until 1971. Concerning San Francisco's quiet removal, Utah Sen. Mike Lee (R) joked online, "'Quick, we can't let the unwashed masses see that the Appeal to Heaven flag isn't a call for violent insurrection!" Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Davy and Natalie Lloyd were American missionaries in Haiti. They were shot and killed by gangs in the war-torn country. While it’s undeniably a tragedy, some have used the horrific story to voice their disdain for mission work — specifically Christian mission work in countries that have traditionally rejected Christian values. Those critical of the work often accuse it of being a form of evil imperialism, colonialism, and white supremacy. “That needs to be put to an end,” Allie Beth Stuckey says, dismayed by the unkind response to the news of the couple's deaths. According to the Christian Post, three missionaries including the American couple and the Haitian director of the mission, Jude Montis, were ambushed and killed by a Haitian gang. Davy Lloyd was 23, and Natalie Lloyd was 21. The couple worked full-time with missions in Haiti for their Oklahoma-based group founded in 2000 by Davy Lloyd’s parents, before being attacked by three truckloads of armed men as they left church. The men reportedly stole trucks and other belongings from the mission. “I think that we can all see the bravery and the love of Christ that was exemplified by these young people and be moved more towards the heart of God and convicted of our complacency and our addiction to comfort,” Stuckey says. Despite the bravery displayed by the missionaries, that hasn’t stopped users of X, formerly known as Twitter, from criticizing them after their deaths. “Random question but what’s the point of Christian missionaries going to Haiti when the country is already 93% Christian?” one user, Karim Wafa-Al Hussaini, wrote in a now-viral tweet. One user responded, “white supremacy is the reason. next question?” Another said, “They think they’re the wrong kind of Christians.” Other users said it was for “human trafficking” or “the gram,” meaning Instagram. “These people of course don’t understand Christianity, and even if they do understand Christianity, they believe that it’s not something to be told, because of course they don’t believe that it’s good news,” Stuckey says. While there are people defending the Lloyds and saying they were there offering humanitarian aid and resources, there are many more alleging that they were simply performative white saviors. “Overwhelmingly, Christians have been the greatest force for good in all of history, the greatest force for humanitarianism in all of history. It doesn’t even come close,” Stuckey says. “From the inception of Christianity and the creation of hospitals, of orphanages, of organizations to feed and to clothe and to help the poor, to the creation of and the spreading of the idea of human right, to the work that we see throughout history and up until today.” “Christians, who are willing without any profit incentive to go into the most dangerous and the poorest communities and to bring life and hope and resources. Again, nothing else comes close,” she adds. Want more from Allie Beth Stuckey?To enjoy more of Allie’s upbeat and in-depth coverage of culture, news, and theology from a Christian, conservative perspective, subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America, defend the Constitution, and live the American dream.

It appears Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg (D) is not winning in the court of public opinion.CNN data expert Harry Enten explained on Wednesday that Bragg's prosecution of Donald Trump — over a hush-money payment that Bragg argues is a case of election interference — is not hurting Trump's perception among his fellow Americans.'That Trump train that has been moving faster than it has ever been moved before in a general election doesn't show any signs of slowing down.'Citing two Quinnipiac University polls, one taken before the trial began and a second taken last week, Enten said the share of Americans who believe Trump is guilty of illegal conduct remains the same at 46%.But a second metric actually suggests the trial has helped Trump."The percentage of Americans who think that the charges are very serious, in fact, dropped from 40% to a little bit more than 35% during the course of this trial," Enten noted. — (@) The fact that Americans are not turning against Trump raises an interesting question: Why not? Democrats and the media, after all, have dedicated a serious chunk of their energy over the last year to highlighting Trump's legal woes. Wouldn't that at least move the needle a little in their favor?As it turns out, Americans just don't care about Trump's legal problems as much as they care about their own, Enten explained — like the economy, inflation, and immigration."What we see is Americans' minds aren't changing, and a big reason why Americans' minds aren't changing is, at this particular point, they are tuned out of the conversation," Enten said."At this particular point, that Trump train that has been moving faster than it has ever been moved before in a general election doesn't show any signs of slowing down, despite the criminal indictments against him, despite the fact that this case in New York is now going to the jury," he added.While the trial itself appears to have had little impact on the public, it remains to be seen how the verdict will impact the election. A guilty verdict could help Trump by aiding the perception that he was unfairly targeted to help President Joe Biden win re-election. On the other hand, because less than a majority of Americans believe the charges are "very serious," an acquittal is not likely to have an impact one way or the other.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

A skull found in a cardboard box at the University of Cambridge could completely upend prior notions about when humans first began attempting to treat cancer. The post Researchers Uncover Evidence That Ancient Egyptians May Have Performed Cancer Surgery As Early As 4,000 Years Ago appeared first on All That's Interesting.

Breed is pushing to expand police funding despite facing a massive budget deficit.

OUCH! Chief Justice Roberts Delivers a SCOTUS Smackdown to Shameless Dem Senators

WRONG Side of History: Iran's Racist, Homophobic, and Violent Supreme Leader Praises Campus Protesters

United States and China: Rivals in an Increasingly Medieval World