YubNub Social YubNub Social
    #california #trafficsafety #carviolence #stopcars #notonemore #carextremism #endcarviolence #bancarsnow #stopcrashing #thinkofthechildren #artificial #highwaysafety #trafficcrash #kretp #goldenstatehighway
    Advanced Search
  • Login
  • Register

  • Night mode
  • © 2026 YubNub Social
    About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App

    Select Language

  • English
Night mode toggle
Featured Content
Community
New Posts (Home) ChatBox Popular Posts Reels Game Zone Top PodCasts
Explore
Explore
© 2026 YubNub Social
  • English
About • Directory • Contact Us • Developers • Privacy Policy • Terms of Use • shareasale • FB Webview Detected • Android • Apple iOS • Get Our App
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Discover posts

Posts

Users

Pages

Blog

Market

Events

Games

Forum

Reclaim The Net Feed
Reclaim The Net Feed
5 d

House Report: EU Pushed Tech Giants to Police US Speech
Favicon 
reclaimthenet.org

House Report: EU Pushed Tech Giants to Police US Speech

If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. A newly released report from the House Judiciary Committee reveals a coordinated effort by European Union regulators to pressure major technology companies into enforcing censorship standards that extend far beyond Europe’s borders. The findings, drawn from thousands of internal documents and communications, detail a long-running strategy to influence global content moderation policies through regulatory coercion and the threat of punishment under Europe’s Digital Services Act (DSA). The Committee’s latest publication, “The EU Censorship Files, Part II,” coincides with a scheduled February 4 hearing titled “Europe’s Threat to American Speech and Innovation: Part II.” We obtained a copy of the report for you here.  According to the materials, European officials have been meeting privately with social media companies since at least 2015 to “adapt their terms and conditions” to align with EU political priorities, including restricting certain kinds of lawful political expression in the United States. Internal records from TikTok, then-Twitter, and other firms show that the Commission’s so-called “voluntary” DSA election guidelines were in fact treated as mandatory conditions for doing business in Europe. Behind closed doors, companies admit the Commission calls the shots — platforms have “no real choice” but to comply. Companies were told to intensify content moderation ahead of elections and report compliance measures to EU officials. Internal Commission guidance acknowledged that platforms were not formally bound to follow the election guidelines word for word. At the same time, the documents make clear that deviation was only acceptable if companies could demonstrate that any alternative approach achieved outcomes at least as effective as the Commission’s preferred mitigation measures. Because the Commission retained authority to judge whether those alternatives were sufficient, the discretion functioned more as a compliance test than a genuine choice. Platforms faced a narrow path: adopt the guidance as written or persuade the regulator that their substitute controls met an undefined but regulator-determined standard. In Romania, declassified national intelligence documents cited in the report call into question claims of Russian interference that had prompted a court to overturn the 2024 presidential election results. TikTok told the European Commission that it had found “no evidence” of any coordinated network tied to the candidate in question, contradicting assertions made by Romanian authorities. TikTok told the EU it found “no evidence” of a Russian campaign backing Calin Georgescu and reported this to authorities. Despite this, the report shows EU regulators continued to use “inauthentic coordination” claims as justification for tightening their election-related moderation directives. The documents also indicate that after meetings with EU officials, TikTok began suppressing lawful conservative statements on topics such as gender identity. One moderation log highlighted a directive to label posts claiming that “there are only two genders” as “harmful misinformation.” Internal documents show TikTok, after the meetings, censored statements like “there are only two genders.” Beyond domestic European elections, EU Vice President Věra Jourová traveled to California ahead of the 2024 US election to discuss the enforcement of these rules with US-based technology companies. Notes from meetings with US-based technology companies show that European officials were asked whether their engagement was limited to elections within the European Union. The response recorded in the documents was brief: “We are interested in both.” The remark indicates that discussions with platforms were not confined to European electoral processes, but extended more broadly to content moderation policies with global reach. Ahead of the 2024 US election, EU VP Vera Jourova flew to California to discuss content moderation, making clear both EU and US elections were on the agenda. According to the Committee, the censorship campaign has operated continuously through dozens of “disinformation” meetings between 2022 and 2024. The pressure reached its peak once the DSA took effect, with the Commission instructing firms to conduct “continuous review of community guidelines.” Internal records depict a process in which the Commission determines the scope of discussion, channels platforms toward a shared mitigation framework, and evaluates compliance, leaving companies with limited practical discretion. This influence has not been limited to electoral content. Earlier emails reveal EU officials urging companies to police discussion of COVID-19 vaccines, particularly campaigns for children in the United States. In 2020, senior EU figures, including President Ursula von der Leyen and Jourová, asked companies to remove or demote posts questioning official pandemic narratives. As early as 2020, EU leaders told platforms to change their rules and remove content that questioned official COVID-19 and vaccine narratives. By 2024, TikTok had rewritten its Community Guidelines to comply with the Digital Services Act, introducing new global rules banning “marginalizing speech” and “civic harm misinformation.” In 2024, TikTok updated its global rules to comply with the EU’s censorship law, now even censoring true, legal speech in the US, including vague terms like “marginalizing speech.” These categories reach far beyond European law, effectively applying EU speech restrictions worldwide. The Committee contends that this change means because of Europe’s censorship law, TikTok censors true information in the United States. The House Judiciary Committee argues that the European Union has exported its censorship framework internationally by exploiting tech companies’ global moderation systems. Internal platform documentation confirms that once adopted, Community Standards are enforced globally rather than on a country-by-country basis, meaning policy changes made to satisfy European regulators affect users everywhere. The hearing on February 4 will examine how these foreign regulatory pressures have shaped US online speech, and whether legislative safeguards are needed to protect Americans’ First Amendment rights from overseas influence. If you're tired of censorship and dystopian threats against civil liberties, subscribe to Reclaim The Net. The post House Report: EU Pushed Tech Giants to Police US Speech appeared first on Reclaim The Net.
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
5 d

The SAVE Act Is Popular, and Democrats Are Terrified of It
Favicon 
hotair.com

The SAVE Act Is Popular, and Democrats Are Terrified of It

The SAVE Act Is Popular, and Democrats Are Terrified of It
Like
Comment
Share
Hot Air Feed
Hot Air Feed
5 d

Commie Mamdani: I, Like, See Dead People, Yo
Favicon 
hotair.com

Commie Mamdani: I, Like, See Dead People, Yo

Commie Mamdani: I, Like, See Dead People, Yo
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
5 d

Barron's Box-Office Bomb Prediction Blows Up in Face as 'Melania' Outperforms Expectations
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

Barron's Box-Office Bomb Prediction Blows Up in Face as 'Melania' Outperforms Expectations

You might not want to rely on investment advice from the weekly financial and investment magazine Barron’s, judging by its bad market call regarding the expected opening week take of the Melania Trump documentary, which opened on Friday: “The Melania Movie Looks Like a Box-Office Flop. What It Means for Amazon.” Reporter George Glover tried to project what Melania's expected box office failure might mean for Amazon.com, which paid to distribute and market the doc from director Brett Ratner. But the purported failure chain fell apart when Melania’s opening week busted box-office expectations (which ranged from $3-$5 million) by raking in an estimated $8.1 million, a huge opening for a non-concert documentary, attracting older conservative women despite wicked reviews. When it comes to the streaming wars, investors have tended to see Amazon.com as an afterthought. The company’s new documentary about Melania Trump looks unlikely to change that. Melania, which captures the first lady’s life in the 20 days leading up to President Donald Trump’s second inauguration, is expected to bring in $2 million to $5 million across 1,500 locations domestically this weekend, according to data from Boxoffice Pro. At first glance, that’s a solid-enough opening weekend for a documentary—but it pales in comparison to what Amazon has spent on Melania. The online retailer bid $40 million to distribute the film and plans to pour another $35 million into marketing the movie, The Wall Street Journal reported Wednesday, citing people familiar with the matter. One mistake by Barron’s: Assuming that low attendance figures from the blue-city bubble could be reliably extrapolated nationwide. But social-media users have made sure to point out how many opening weekend tickets have gone unsold. Empire 25 in New York City, one of AMC Entertainment flagship movie theaters, has sold 11 seats for its first screening, at 7:30 p.m. Eastern time on Friday, for instance. Glover's wrap-up hinted that the anticipated box-office failure (oops!) lay in trying to appeal to controversial conservative audiences. Still, if Amazon wants to compete with big dogs like Walt Disney and Netflix in the streaming wars, Jeff Bezos’ tech conglomerate might want to continue its push into live sports, which attract bigger audiences with less social-media pushback.
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
5 d

Behar Equates Don Lemon Storming Church to Press Documenting Nazi Concentration Camps
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

Behar Equates Don Lemon Storming Church to Press Documenting Nazi Concentration Camps

Finally back from a week-long unexplained absence, ABC co-host Joy Behar returned to The View as crazy as ever. Delivering her first public comments about the arrest of disgraced form CNN host Don Lemon, on Tuesday, Behar defended not only Lemon but the rioters who stormed the Cities Church in St. Paul Minnesota. She claimed they had a right to protest in the church and ludicrously equated Lemon being in the church to General Dwight D. Eisenhower bringing in journalists to document concentration camps and the Holocaust. Behar began her comments by suggesting that Lemon and the mob of leftist extremists somehow had a right to storm a church, disrupt the service, refuse to leave when asked, and obstruct parishioners who tried to leave. “So, I mean, all I can say is it’s in the Constitution, the right to protest; and he wasn't even there protesting. He was there as a journalist,” she argued. “And I think they want to use him as some kind of a, you know, an example to intimidate other journalists.” Further proving how detached from reality she was, Behar sought to tie a parallel between Lemon storming Cities Church to Eisenhower bringing in journalists to document the Dachau concentration camp: But, you know, I was reading something the other day about World War II. When the Americans liberated Dachau, after World War II during the Holocaust – after the Holocaust, Dwight D. Eisenhower said take pictures of these concentration camps because years will go by and people will not believe this happened. So, this administration does not really like somebody like Don Lemon who has a camera, who a position - like we do in a way - to speak to the people and tell them what really is going on. So, you know, God bless Dwight D. Eisenhower and Don Lemon.   Joy Behar equates Don Lemon going into that St. Paul church to Eisenhower bringing in journalists to witness concentration camps: JOY BEHAR: So, i mean, all I can say is its in the Constitution, the right to protest; and he wasn't even there protesting. He was there as a… pic.twitter.com/ZMKoLS2980 — Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) February 3, 2026   Behar never explained what she thought was happening inside the church that warranted her making that analogy. Stepping up to once again defend her “dearest friend,” co-host Sunny Hostin insisted that what Lemon did was “perfectly normal” and compared it to journalists embedding themselves with law enforcement: HOSTIN: And I think people need to remember that journalists embed themselves in protests, embed themselves with the government, embed themselves - HAINES: In campaigns. HOSTIN: - in campaigns, embed themselves in police activity all the time. That is the practice of journalism. So, the fact that he was at a protest embedded in it is perfectly normal. It is not a crime to be a journalist. Attempting to have it both ways, Behar built off Hostin by arguing that even if Lemon was protesting by busting into the church, it was a protected act. “No, but even if he was protesting, it is guaranteed by the Constitution,” she said.   Sunny Hostin claims it's "perfectly normal" for journalists to take part in a protest like Lemon did. Behar defends the rioters busting into the church: "No, but even if he was protesting, it is guaranteed by the Constitution." Faux conservative Alyssa Farah Griffin claims Lemon… pic.twitter.com/ApVVzJGHSk — Nicholas Fondacaro (@NickFondacaro) February 3, 2026   Useless “Republican” Alyssa Farah Griffin even backed up Behar. “But under freedom of the press though, under the First Amendment he has a right to be there covering it,” she added. “If you go to the ACLU, they will send you the Constitution. If you haven't read it lately, it's really interesting. You'd be surprised at all the things that should be happening but are not,” moderator Whoopi Goldberg pompously declared. All of them were wrong. The First Amendment’s right to free speech did not supersede the amendment’s right to freely practice one’s religion. Of course, they also refused to actually examine the law Lemon and the rioters allegedly broke, which - in part - made it a crime to disrupt a religious service. The transcript is below. Click "expand" to read: ABC’s The View February 3, 2026 11:17:08 a.m. Eastern (…) JOY BEHAR: I know Don very well. And I wasn’t here. So, I mean, all I can say is it’s in the Constitution, the right to protest; and he wasn't even there protesting. He was there as a journalist. SUNNY HOSTIN: Correct. BEHAR: And I think they want to use him as some kind of a, you know, an example to intimidate other journalists. SARA HAINES: To scare people. HOSTIN: Other journalists. BEHAR: But, you know, I was reading something the other day about World War II. When the Americans liberated Dachau, after World War II during the Holocaust – after the Holocaust, Dwight D. Eisenhower said take pictures of these concentration camps because years will go by and people will not believe this happened. So, this administration does not really like somebody like Don Lemon who has a camera, who a position - like we do in a way - to speak to the people and tell them what really is going on. So, you know, God bless Dwight D. Eisenhower and Don Lemon. And I would just like to add that I think they've made him more popular than ever. HOSTIN: Yes. BEHAR: He now will triple his viewership on his podcast. Good for you. (…) 11:18:43 a.m. Eastern HOSTIN: And I think people need to remember that journalists embed themselves in protests, embed themselves with the government, embed themselves - HAINES: In campaigns. HOSTIN: - in campaigns, embed themselves in police activity all the time. That is the practice of journalism. So, the fact that he was at a protest embedded in it is perfectly normal. It is not a crime to be a journalist. BEHAR: No, but even if he was protesting, it is guaranteed by the Constitution. HOSTIN: But he was not protesting, he was embedded. ALYSSA FARAH GRIFFIN: But under freedom of the press though, under the First Amendment he has a right to be there covering it. GOLDBERG: If you go to the ACLU, they will send you the Constitution. If you haven't read it lately, it's really interesting. You'd be surprised at all the things that should be happening but are not.
Like
Comment
Share
NewsBusters Feed
NewsBusters Feed
5 d

SNL Joins In Hurling Nazi Accusations at ICE
Favicon 
www.newsbusters.org

SNL Joins In Hurling Nazi Accusations at ICE

With ICE-Nazi analogies flying all over the late night comedy shows, it was inevitable that NBC’s Saturday Night Live would join the trend, and they did this past weekend during its 1,000th episode in both the cold open and Weekend Update segments. During the cold open, Pete Davidson portrayed border czar Tom Homan, who told an assembled group of ICE agents, “Now, I'm sure a lot of you are wondering why Greg Bovino, the last guy, was dismissed. I want to stress that it wasn't because he did a bad job. Or publicly lied about the shooting of an American citizen. Or even, uh-oh, dressed like a Nazi. It was that he was filmed doing these things. And the president no like-y that.” That then led to Fake Homan asking the crowd some questions, which they would also get wrong. For instance, Davidson began, “Now, who can tell me why we're here in Minneapolis?”   SNL had Pete Davidson play Tom Homan (who doesn't look much like Homan) and continue the ICE-are-Nazis line, "Now I'm sure a lot of you are wondering why Greg Bovino, the last guy, was dismissed. I want to stress that it wasn't because he did a bad job. Or publicly lied about the… pic.twitter.com/YWES23GWnz — Alex Christy (@alexchristy17) February 3, 2026   Kenan Thompson’s ICE agent simply said, “Pass,” which led Davidson to try the same question again. This time James Austin Johnson answered, “This could be wrong, but army?” Davidson replied, “Close. That's close. We're here to detain and deport illegal immigrants who have committed crimes.” Andrew Dismukes declared, “That is literally the first I'm hearing of that.” Later, Davidson told the agents, “It's not just about doing the mission. It's about doing it the right way. A lot of the bad press we're getting is coming from the aggressive tactics we're using.” That led Thompson to add, “And the Nazi coat,” to which Davidson agreed while also asking, “Yes, the Nazi coat, very good. So, let's talk about use of force. When do we want to use force?” Ben Marshall replied, “Right away,” and after Davidson urged them to “think of the opposite,” Dismukes tried, “preemptively.” Davidson tried again, “Also no. It's kind of a trick question, because we actually don't want to use force. Remember, the job ultimately is about keeping America safe from what?” Johnson answered, “This could be wrong, but Don Lemon?” Don Lemon was not arrested by ICE, but facts aside, the Nazi analogies kept coming on Weekend Update. Co-anchor Colin Jost began by putting up two pictures: one of Bovino and another of a Sean Penn character who has been described as a “pocket Nazi.” Jost declared, “Meanwhile, President Trump is changing things up in Minnesota to calm the recent violence against his poll numbers. Border patrol official Gregory Bovino, who was incredible in One Battle After Another, has been removed from overseeing the Minneapolis ICE operation, and hopefully he was removed ICE-style through the broken window of his car.” Jost also quipped, “Bovino was replaced by border czar Tom Homan, seen here just thinking about Bad Bunny's halftime show. Call me crazy, but I don't see this guy calming things down. This feels like trying to quit cocaine by taking up crack.”   SNL had Pete Davidson play Tom Homan (who doesn't look much like Homan) and continue the ICE-are-Nazis line, "Now I'm sure a lot of you are wondering why Greg Bovino, the last guy, was dismissed. I want to stress that it wasn't because he did a bad job. Or publicly lied about the… pic.twitter.com/YWES23GWnz — Alex Christy (@alexchristy17) February 3, 2026   Co-anchor Michael Che also got in on the ICE bashing, “Tom Homan called on local leaders in Minneapolis to work with ICE agents to tone down the dangerous rhetoric, because all that rhetoric just distracts agents from their main aim: anyone filming.” Later, Jost got in one last Nazi mention, complete with a reference to Jeffrey Epstein, “Minnesota Governor Tim Walz compared the Trump administration's immigration crackdown to the Nazi occupation described in The Diary of Anne Frank, but remember this administration has always ignored the stories told by young girls.” In more SNL lowlights, Ashley Padilla portrayed a Trump-supporting mother who claimed to have seen the light and told her liberal children she no longer supports him, “The things that are happening—no one could have seen coming. I feel like—the way they talk about guns is different for different people. They made me feel worried about trans people. But now I'm realizing I don't really get what the problem is. I'm starting to wonder if drag queens are actually hilarious.” Why aren’t you laughing? Here is a transcript for the January 31 show: NBC Saturday Night Live 1/31/2026 11:30 PM ET PETE DAVIDSON/TOM HOMAN: All right, everyone. All right. Thank you. All right. All right, everyone, settle down. My name is Tom Homan. Now, I'm sure a lot of you are wondering why Greg Bovino, the last guy, was dismissed. I want to stress that it wasn't because he did a bad job. Or publicly lied about the shooting of an American citizen. Or even, uh-oh, dressed like a Nazi. It was that he was filmed doing these things. And the president no like-y that. So I'm here now, and we need to tighten up. That starts with remembering the mission objective. Now, who can tell me why we're here in Minneapolis? KENAN THOMPSON/ICE AGENT 1: Pass. DAVIDSON: Nope, can't pass. Come on, guys. What are we doing in Minneapolis? JAMES AUSTIN JOHNSON/ICE AGENT 2: This could be wrong, but army? DAVIDSON: Close. That's close. We're here to detain and deport illegal immigrants who have committed crimes. ANDREW DISMUKES/ICE AGENT 3: That is literally the first I'm hearing of that. DAVIDSON: Well, it shouldn't be. Just so I know what were you told you should be doing? MIKEY DAY/ICE AGENT 4: Um – wild n’ out. DAVIDSON: You know, forget everything you were told before. We're not here to intimidate, racially profile, or violate anyone's rights. So again, what are we looking for? THOMPSON: Epstein files? DAVIDSON: Nope! Nope! We actually just released those to distract from this. You know, which is ironic, because we did this to distract from those. So, anyway, guys. It's not just about doing the mission. It's about doing it the right way. A lot of the bad press we're getting is coming from the aggressive tactics we're using. THOMPSON: And the Nazi coat. DAVIDSON: Yes, the Nazi coat, very good. So, let's talk about use of force. When do we want to use force? BEN MARSHALL/ICE AGENT 5: Right away? DAVIDSON: No. Think of the opposite. DISMUKES: Right. Preemptively. DAVIDSON: Also no. It's kind of a trick question, because we actually don't want to use force. Remember, the job ultimately is about keeping America safe from what? JOHNSON: This could be wrong, but Don Lemon? … COLIN JOST: Meanwhile, President Trump is changing things up in Minnesota to calm the recent violence against his poll numbers. Border patrol official Gregory Bovino, who was incredible in One Battle After Another, has been removed from overseeing the Minneapolis ICE operation, and hopefully he was removed ICE-style through the broken window of his car. Bovino was replaced by border czar Tom Homan, seen here just thinking about Bad Bunny's halftime show. Call me crazy, but I don't see this guy calming things down. This feels like trying to quit cocaine by taking up crack. MICHALE CHE: Tom Homan called on local leaders in Minneapolis to work with ICE agents to tone down the dangerous rhetoric, because all that rhetoric just distracts agents from their main aim: anyone filming. … JOST: Minnesota Governor Tim Walz compared the Trump administration's immigration crackdown to the Nazi occupation described The Diary of Anne Frank, but remember this administration has always ignored the stories told by young girls. 
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
5 d

Video: All-out brawl erupts between adult male with MAGA hat and more than a dozen apparent HS students at ICE protest
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Video: All-out brawl erupts between adult male with MAGA hat and more than a dozen apparent HS students at ICE protest

Cellphone videos caught the moment when an all-out brawl erupted between an adult male with a MAGA hat and over a dozen apparent high school students at an Immigration and Customs Enforcement protest Monday afternoon in Texas.The Buda Police Department said a Hays County Sheriff’s Office school resource officer at Moe and Gene Johnson High School in Buda indicated that students were conducting a “walkout” protest on RM967. Buda is about 20 minutes southwest of Austin.'Hey, you want another a**-beating, come on out!'Law enforcement personnel responded to the area to provide safety and security for pedestrians and motorists, police said.But police added that Buda officers were dispatched to the intersection of RM967 and FM1626 for a fight in progress just before 3 p.m.Arriving officers were notified that a female juvenile on the sidewalk and an adult male in a vehicle were engaged in a verbal argument, police said, adding that the argument escalated into a physical altercation involving multiple people.You can view a clip of the brawl in KXAN-TV's video report about the altercation; it shows what appears to be at least a dozen apparent high school students punching and kicking the adult male, knocking him to the ground, and even putting him in a headlock until he's able to get up and retreat to his vehicle. There is no audio.Both primary parties involved were identified, the situation remains under investigation, and no arrests have been made at this time, police said.A Hays Consolidated Independent School District spokesperson told KXAN-TV that the district is aware of the video of the fight but said police are handling the investigation since the incident happened off campus.RELATED: Minnesota police FINALLY fight back: Cops hit violent anti-ICE mob with tear gas, arrests outside hotel supposedly housing feds Image source: Buda (Texas) Police DepartmentBuda Police on Tuesday told Blaze News they expect to make an arrest or arrests but have no timeline for when that will happen. Blaze News asked police if the adult male involved in the fight is a teacher — due to numerous social media posts indicating he is — but police replied, "Not that we’re aware of."One crucial element police confirmed to Blaze News is that the adult male involved in the fight did indeed have a red MAGA hat on his person during the altercation.There are a handful of videos of the fight apart from the clip included in KXAN's video report — and they are linked in comments under the police department's Facebook post about the brawl.As police noted, the adult male was in a vehicle when he verbally argued with the juvenile female — and then things got physical. Indeed one clip recorded from a distance shows what appears to be the adult male on the street swinging at a female as they move from the street to the sidewalk and to the grass.A second clip recorded very close to the fight shows what appears to be the adult male holding a MAGA hat while swinging at a female and pushing her backward as she fights back; she momentarily grabs the MAGA hat before she falls to the grass.A third clip includes what the KXAN video shows — except with audio. Those fighting and watching the brawl are heard yelling, "What the f**k?" and "Get him!" and "F**k ICE! You're a bitch!" and "F**kin' kill yourself!" Once the adult male is back in his vehicle — and his MAGA hat is back in his possession — one individual from the crowd is heard yelling at him, "Hey, you want another ass-beating, come on out!" The adult male eventually puts the MAGA hat on his head.What isn't clear is why the adult male got out of his vehicle in the first place.When Blaze News asked police if the adult male indicated why he left his vehicle and physically fought the juvenile female, police replied that it's still under investigation.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
The Blaze Media Feed
The Blaze Media Feed
5 d

Ex-husband of Jill Biden charged in the murder of his second wife
Favicon 
www.theblaze.com

Ex-husband of Jill Biden charged in the murder of his second wife

77-year-old William Stevenson, the ex-husband of former first lady Jill Biden, was taken into custody Monday and charged in the death of his second wife.A grand jury indictment filed in Delaware said that Stevenson is facing a first-degree murder charge after 64-year-old Linda Stevenson was found dead on Dec. 28 in their home in New Castle County.William Stevenson had previously said of Linda, 'She's the greatest thing in my life.'William Stevenson was married to Jill Tracy Jacobs for five years beginning in 1970, until she met then-Sen. Joe Biden in March 1975. Stevenson says she had an affair with Biden and a civil divorce was granted to the couple two months later. She and Biden were married in 1977.Stevenson then met and married his second wife, Linda, and was married to her for nearly four decades until her death.Police said they were called to the home on a report of a domestic dispute and found Linda Stevenson unresponsive in the living room. They were unable to revive her, and she was pronounced dead at the scene.Her body was turned over to the Delaware Division of Forensic Science, which has not yet released a determination of cause of death.William Stevenson failed to post a $500,000 bail and is being held at the Howard Young Correctional Institution in Wilmington.Police said Stevenson's arrest was the result of a "extensive weeks-long investigation" into his wife's death.Stevenson had been a supporter of former President Barack Obama but later became a fan of President Donald Trump. In 2023 he called Trump "a president that I love and respect" and accused the "Biden crime family" of unfairly targeting Trump.RELATED: Jill Biden mocked for comparing Hispanics to tacos at 'Latinx Incluxion' conference Stevenson also grew critical of Jill Biden as Joe Biden's mental diminishment became more obvious."I just don’t understand why she is so adamant about defending him and keeping him in the race since it appears that he’s struggling," he said. "It appears that he’s struggling with everybody these days."William Stevenson had previously said of Linda, "She's the greatest thing in my life."Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors, sign up for our newsletters, and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
5 d

The Horrifying Story Of Brandi Worley, The Indiana Mother Who Stabbed Her Two Children Because Her Husband Asked For A Divorce
Favicon 
allthatsinteresting.com

The Horrifying Story Of Brandi Worley, The Indiana Mother Who Stabbed Her Two Children Because Her Husband Asked For A Divorce

FacebookBrandi Worley murdered her two children, Tyler and Charlee, in the middle of the night. On November 17, 2016, Jason Worley woke up in the small town of Darlington, Indiana, to the sound of his mother-in-law screaming. To his horror, he discovered that his wife, Brandi Worley, had murdered their two children. “Now you can’t take my children from me,” she allegedly said. The murder of Tyler and Charlee Worley, ages seven and three, came just after Jason had told Brandi that he wanted to file for divorce. But her stoicism ever since has unnerved many, and the judge in her case noted that: “Sometimes there is no explanation [for murder]. Darkness is in this world… And it penetrates minds and our hearts.” Why Jason And Brandi Worley Were Divorcing Before their marriage went sour, Jason and Brandi Worley had been married for seven years. They were engaged for two years and were married in 2009. Soon afterward, Brandi became pregnant with their first child, but the couple faced challenges when Tyler was born 10 weeks early. At that point, the new parents made a promise to each other — to prioritize the well-being and happiness of their children above all else. “We always said the children would come first, before each other or our marriage,” Jason recalled, according to the Journal & Courier. GoFundMe/Tyler & Charlee Worley FundJason Worley with Tyler and Charlee in an undated photo. Four years after Tyler was born, the couple had another child, a daughter named Charlee. But as time went on, Jason began to suspect that his wife was being unfaithful to him. As Oxygen reports, a Reddit post on October 28, 2016, that appears to have been written by Jason describes how his wife cheated on him. “I’m [30/m] having a hard time coping with my wife [29/f] having cheated on me with our neighbor [51/m]” the post explains. Advice poured in from all corners of the Internet and, in November 2016, Jason told Brandi that he wanted a divorce. “She understood why we were getting a divorce,” Jason later said. Though PEOPLE confirms that he filed for divorce on Nov. 16, 2016, Jason and Brandi Worley continued to act like everything was normal. That day, they went to a dance program for Charlee and ate dinner together at home. Then Brandi Worley told Jason that she needed to go to Walmart to get pipe cleaners for one of Tyler’s school projects. But instead of pipe cleaners, Brandi bought a knife. The Murders Of Tyler And Charlee Worley On the night of Nov. 16, 2016, Jason spent time playing with the children. Unbeknownst to him, Brandi had hidden her newly purchased knife in Tyler’s room. He bathed the Tyler and Charlee and got them ready for bed. “I told them that ‘I love you and I’ll see you in the morning,'” he recalled. He never imagined that it would be the last time he would see them alive. GoFundMe/Tyler & Charlee Worley FundCharlee and Tyler were stabbed to death by their mother, Brandi Worley. Just a few hours later, early on the morning of Nov. 17, Brandi Worley woke up Tyler and suggested they have a “sleepover” in Charlee’s room. There, she straddled her son and stabbed him multiple times with a combat knife. Charlee briefly awoke during the attack, but Brandi told her that everything was ok. Trusting in her mother’s words, Charlee fell back asleep. But once Tyler was dead, Brandi then killed Charlee with the same knife. At some point, she also tried to take her own life by stabbing herself in the neck. Then, Brandi Worley called her horrified mother. She ordered Brandi to call the police — and then raced to Brandi and Jason’s house. At around 4:35 a.m., Brandi made a chilling call to Montgomery County 911. In a shocking admission, she confessed to stabbing herself and killing her two children. She remained surprisingly composed as she calmly informed the dispatcher about what she had done and revealed that she had also consumed a large amount of Benadryl. “I just stabbed myself and I killed my two children,” she said. “You stabbed yourself and killed your two children?” the dispatcher questioned. “Mmm-hmm,” Worley responded. With slurred speech, she informed the dispatcher that her children were dead were on the floor in her daughter’s room. Then she revealed her motive. She explained that her husband wanted a divorce and custody of their kids, and she was fearful of losing them, so she resorted to murder. “My husband wanted a divorce and wanted to take my kids,” Brandi told the dispatcher. “I don’t want him to have my kids.” Police Find A Gruesome Crime Scene At The Worley Residence When Brandi Worley’s mother arrived at the house, she got on the phone with the 911 dispatcher, who told her to check the children’s bedrooms to see if Brandi was telling the truth. She obeyed and, finding the children, became hysterical, crying: “my babies” and “I don’t know, I just don’t know.” The piercing screams of terror from Brandi’s mother awoke Jason. He ran up the stairs and found his mother-in-law crying in the kitchen. Brandi, sitting nearby, callously told him: “Now you can’t take the kids from me.” Police quickly responded to the house and took Jason outside, where he heard the horrible truth from the crackling of one of their radios: “Two deceased children in the house.” Inside, Brandi told paramedics that she had tried to die by suicide but she had “somehow screwed that up” and that she “didn’t want [the children] to live without [her].” FacebookBrandi Worley murdered her children in November 2016, and will spend the rest of her life in prison. According to The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Brandi was taken to the hospital to treat her self-inflicted wounds. During her interaction with law enforcement and medical professionals, she seemed “matter-of-fact” and not remorseful. Brandi Worley was charged with two counts of murder. But as time went on, her “matter-of-fact” demeanor didn’t change. Brandi Worley Pleads Guilty To Two Counts Of Murder At Brandi Worley’s trial, she plead guilty to murdering her children. Throughout the legal process, Brandi exhibited a complete lack of regret for the heartbreaking crimes she committed. Brandi received a diagnosis of depression, a condition that appears to have drained her of all emotions. Mark Inman, her attorney, explains that this emotional detachment has become her way of coping with the challenges she faces. The gravity of her actions, and the toll on her mental well-being, left her disconnected from the tragedy that she caused. Montgomery County Sheriff’s OfficeBrandi Worley was found guilty of murder and sentenced to 120 years in prison. Brandi Worley was found guilty of murder and handed separate sentences for the deaths of each of her children. She was then sentenced to 55 years for the murder of her son and 65 years for the killing of her daughter – 120 years in total. These sentences will be served consecutively, effectively imprisoning Brandi for life. For Jason Worley, nothing will ever ease the pain of losing his children. But he seems thankful that Brandi will spend the rest of her life behind bars. “All I care is to never see her again,” he said. “Out of sight and out of mind.” After reading about the tragic case of Brandi Worley, read about the woman who grilled her daughter alive. Then, learn about the 28 children killed in the Atlanta Child Murders.. The post The Horrifying Story Of Brandi Worley, The Indiana Mother Who Stabbed Her Two Children Because Her Husband Asked For A Divorce appeared first on All That's Interesting.
Like
Comment
Share
History Traveler
History Traveler
5 d

Inside The Horrifying Mystery Of The Bear Brook Murders — And The Evidence That Points To The ‘Chameleon Killer’
Favicon 
allthatsinteresting.com

Inside The Horrifying Mystery Of The Bear Brook Murders — And The Evidence That Points To The ‘Chameleon Killer’

Wikimedia CommonsFrom left: Marlyse Honeychurch, Marie Elizabeth Vaughn, a still unidentified victim, and Sarah McWaters. The case stumped investigators for years: four bodies, found dismembered, skeletonized, wrapped in plastic bags, and stuffed in two 55-gallon steel drums in the Bear Brook State Park in Allenstown, New Hampshire. And for years, no one could put a name to them, instead referring to the “Bear Brook murders.” Curiously, the first drum was found way back in 1985 — and the second wasn’t discovered until 2000. But there was no doubt the killings had been the handiwork of the same person. As it turned out, that person had been several different people throughout his life. Known at times as “Curtis Kimball,” others as “Larry Vanner,” and frequently as “Bob Evans,” the killer’s true name was revealed as Terry Rasmussen in 2017 — seven years after his death. Yet, they still had no clue who the victims were. Three of the victims would be identified, however, two years later, thanks to the obsessive amateur sleuthing of Rebekah Heath and Barbara Rae-Venter. The identity of the fourth victim still remains a mystery. This is the twisted story of the Bear Brook Murders. Four Bodies Are Discovered In Bear Brook State Park — 15 Years Apart On Nov. 10, 1985, a hunter trekking through Bear Brook State Park in Allenstown, New Hampshire came across a large, industrial steel drum. Inside, he found two bodies, dismembered, wrapped in plastic bags, and highly “skeletonized” beyond recognition, Oxygen reported. It was determined that they had been killed sometime between 1977 and 1985. The bodies were eventually buried in a nearby cemetery with a tombstone that read: “Here lies the mortal remains known only to God of a woman aged 23-33 and a girl child aged 8-10. Their slain bodies were found on November 10th, 1985, in Bear Brook State Park. May their souls find peace in God’s loving care.” The case had gone ice cold. Then 15 years later, on May 9, 2000, a second 55-gallon drum was discovered in the same area. How investigators had missed it over a decade prior remains unclear, but the second barrel, like the first, contained the mutilated bodies of two young girls, stored in the same manner. This new discovery didn’t offer any immediate clues as to who the killer had been, though. The bodies were certainly killed around the same time as the first two, but with no way to identify them, and lacking any other insight, the investigation once again reached a dead end. It would take 17 years until the killer could be named — and another two until his victims would be identified. Terry Peder Rasmussen — The Killer With Many Names Public DomainTerry Peder Rasmussen’s 2002 mugshot after his arrest for the murder of his girlfriend Eunsoon Jun. In 2017, using genetic genealogy techniques, investigators were finally able to name their man: Terry Rasmussen, an inmate who had died seven years earlier in 2010 while serving a sentence for the murder of his then-girlfriend, Eunsoon Jun. It wasn’t Rasmussen’s first time in prison, however — he’d just been using a different name. As the Los Angeles Times notes, Rasmussen had spent time in jail in the early 1990s for theft under the name Robert Evans. Before that, he’d been jailed in 1988 for driving a stolen vehicle under the name Gerry Mockerman, and even earlier in 1985 for drunk driving and child endangerment. He later abandoned that child, whom he had pretended to father and called Lisa, in a trailer park. After his stint in the 1990s, Rasmussen stayed off authorities’ radar for a little over a decade. By 2001, Rasmussen was working odd jobs in California under yet another alias, Lawrence Vanner. He had an “unofficial backyard marriage ceremony” to Eunsoon Jun in Richmond that same year, though no marriage certificates were ever filed. A year later, Jun’s body was found dismembered and buried in her basement. Curiously, against the advice of his attorneys, “Vanner” pleaded guilty to the murder during his trial. Authorities were able to link him then, using his fingerprints, to the earlier child abandonment case. Testing his DNA, they also determined that the man had not, in fact, been Lisa’s father — and an investigation began to find out who Lisa really was. Lisa sent a sample of her DNA to an ancestry website and learned her mother’s name: Denise Beaudin. And Denise only had one daughter, whom she had named Dawn. Beaudin and Dawn, an infant at the time, had gone missing from their home in Manchester, New Hampshire just after Thanksgiving in 1983. They had been living with a man named Bob Evans. Maricopa County Sheriff’s Department, Arizona.A mugshot of Terry Rasmussen from 1973. By 2017, Bob Evans was dead, and investigators believed he had killed Denise Beaudin after they left New Hampshire. There were still many questions to be answered and gaps in Evans’ history to fill in, but now investigators had a crucial piece of evidence — Bob Evans, or Lawrence Vanner, had lived in New Hampshire in the mid-1980s. DNA evidence then connected the man officially identified as Terry Rasmussen to the bodies found in Bear Brook. One of the victims had been his daughter. “We believe we have our killer,” said New Hampshire Assistant Attorney General Jeffrey Strelzin at the time. “Now we need to identify and try to find all of his victims.” The Amateur Sleuths Who Solved The Bear Brook Murders In October 2018, the New Hampshire Public Radio released a podcast called “Bear Brook,” which explored the bizarre, unique case. Investigators knew who their killer was, but they still had no clue who the victims were. The podcast had reignited interest in the case, and captured the attention of a 34-year-old librarian from Connecticut named Becky Heath. In her free time, Heath began scouring the internet for any clues she could find. “I got a little crazy with it,” she said. “I would go to work and I’d come home and I would just research and research and research.” Jessica Rinaldi/The Boston Globe via Getty ImagesRebekah “Becky” Heath, the researcher and librarian who obsessively worked to discover the identities of Terry Rasmussen’s victims. Online, she found a post from someone who mentioned the name Sarah McWaters. The poster claimed to be McWaters’ half-sister. Replies were filled with other people who also believed they were related to Sarah — one member of a family of three who had gone missing sometime in the late 1970s. The family was comprised of Sarah McWaters, an infant, her older sister Marie Elizabeth Vaughn, and their mother Marlyse Honeychurch. Heath continued researching, messaging some of the family members who had been around at the time when another name came up: Terry Rasmussen. Apparently, Honeychurch had been with Rasmussen the last time she was seen. “I was like, ‘There is no way — there is no way that’s a coincidence,'” Heath said, “‘This is huge.'” At the same time, Barbara Rae-Venter, a genetic genealogist, independently used the victims’ DNA to identify them in a cutting-edge technique that required using autosomal DNA, which is found inside the cell nucleus. It had previously been thought impossible to recover autosomal DNA from hair strands that were no longer attached to the root, but a forensic lab in California had been working on a new method to reassemble the broken autosomal DNA found in rootless hair. After months of trial and error, Rae-Venter was able to use this method to identify the victims. Heath submitted her tip to authorities in October 2018. The victims were officially named in June 2019. Now, the only question that remains is, who was the middle child, Terry Rasmussen’s daughter and fourth victim? After reading about the long journey to identify the Chameleon Killer’s victims, read about the Green River Killer, Gary Ridgway. Then, learn about Ivan Milat, Australia’s most violent serial killer. The post Inside The Horrifying Mystery Of The Bear Brook Murders — And The Evidence That Points To The ‘Chameleon Killer’ appeared first on All That's Interesting.
Like
Comment
Share
Showing 643 out of 109066
  • 639
  • 640
  • 641
  • 642
  • 643
  • 644
  • 645
  • 646
  • 647
  • 648
  • 649
  • 650
  • 651
  • 652
  • 653
  • 654
  • 655
  • 656
  • 657
  • 658
Advertisement
Stop Seeing These Ads

Edit Offer

Add tier








Select an image
Delete your tier
Are you sure you want to delete this tier?

Reviews

In order to sell your content and posts, start by creating a few packages. Monetization

Pay By Wallet

Payment Alert

You are about to purchase the items, do you want to proceed?

Request a Refund