In a display of grotesque moral bankruptcy, Oxford Union’s incoming president George Abaraonye appeared to celebrate the murder of Charlie Kirk — just months after debating him on stage. Following Kirk’s assassination at Utah Valley University — where he was shot in the neck while calmly fielding questions — Abaraonye allegedly posted in a student WhatsApp group, “Charlie Kirk got shot, let’s f***ing go,” and later followed it up with, “Charlie Kirk got shot loool,” indicating laughter, The Telegraph reported. Meet the new president of @OxfordUnion — the world’s foremost debating society and last bastion of free speech, apparently.#CharlieKirk pic.twitter.com/KlWY9w4dif — Peter Lloyd (@Suffragent_) September 11, 2025 George Abaraonye, Incoming Oxford Union President celebrated Charlie Kirk’s death. The same @OxfordUnion that recently hosted Charlie Kirk for a debate! pic.twitter.com/8VapXgZXmm — Pippa B ????????? ? ❤️ ?? (@pippaisright) September 11, 2025 Now I've seen the actual message George Abaraonye posted, complete with praying hands, as if thanking God for Charlie Kirk's death, he is absolutely not a fit and proper person to become President of the @OxfordUnion in Hilary Term 2026. I hope the other Officers will consider… pic.twitter.com/V2Ph8UapVn — Adrian Hilton (@Adrian_Hilton) September 11, 2025 This from a man tapped to lead the Oxford Union, a society historically revered for its commitment to civil discourse and open debate. Kirk, 31, a father of two and the founder of Turning Point USA, had become a lightning rod for the MAGA youth movement. He was in the middle of his “American Comeback Tour” when he was gunned down. His message — calling on students to challenge him face-to-face — was a hallmark of his commitment to real dialogue in a culture increasingly allergic to dissent. Abaraonye had previously debated Kirk at the Oxford Union in May. Kirk, ever the civil opponent, reportedly told him afterward to “think about” their exchange. In response to the explosive revelations, the Oxford Union scrambled into damage control. In a public statement, the institution wrote: The Oxford Union would like to unequivocally condemn the reported words and sentiments expressed by the President-Elect, George Abaraonye, with regards to the passing of Charlie Kirk. His reported views do not represent the Oxford Union’s current leadership or committee’s view. The current administration has, under President Moosa Harraj, no association with, and is entirely independent from, Mr Abaraonye’s administration. In alignment with the statement published by our Society earlier today, we reaffirm our stance that the Oxford Union firmly opposes all forms of political violence and strongly stands by our commitment to free speech and considerate debate. We would like to reiterate that our condolences lie with Charlie Kirk’s family, especially his wife and young children, who are enduring such terrible grief. pic.twitter.com/zlagxKTC74 — Oxford Union (@OxfordUnion) September 11, 2025 George Abaraonye has yet to respond publicly. Charlie Kirk’s wife and young children now mourn the loss of a husband and father — while a would-be intellectual elite in Oxford jokes about his death. This is where we are.

In a shocking revelation, a leftist media outlet boasts about paying witches to curse conservative icon Charlie Kirk just days before his untimely death. Jezebel’s Controversial Article On September 8, 2025, Jezebel published an article detailing how they paid individuals on Etsy, who identified as witches, to cast curses on Charlie Kirk. The piece was presented in a satirical fashion, consistent with Jezebel’s editorial approach, aiming to critique political polarization. However, the timing of the article’s publication, just days before the conservative commentator’s death, escalated it into a point of contention. Critics question the appropriateness and ethics of such content in today’s highly charged media landscape. The article’s provocative angle involved using real-world “witches” from Etsy as a narrative device. This approach not only sparked controversy but also required a subsequent editorial note from Jezebel. Following Kirk’s death, the media outlet added a note condemning the shooting and reaffirming their opposition to political violence. This move, however, did little to quell the backlash from conservative circles, who viewed the article as an attack on a prominent right-wing figure. Media Ethics Under Scrutiny The timing of Jezebel’s article has drawn significant criticism and scrutiny, with many accusing the outlet of irresponsibility. In a media environment where the line between satire and reality often blurs, the use of witches as a motif to mock a political figure like Kirk has raised ethical questions. Media ethicists warn about the risks of satire intersecting with real-world violence, especially when the timing of such content could be perceived as insensitive or inflammatory. Despite Jezebel’s editorial note distancing itself from endorsing violence, the damage to its reputation among conservative audiences might be lasting. The incident has intensified partisan media criticism and highlighted the broader debate about the role of satire in political discourse. Media outlets may now find themselves reevaluating their editorial policies regarding sensitive topics and the potential repercussions of satire gone awry. Potential Long-Term Impacts The controversy surrounding Jezebel’s article and the tragic event of Kirk’s death could have several implications for both media and political landscapes. In the short term, there is likely to be heightened scrutiny of media ethics, particularly concerning satire and its timing relative to real-world events. In the long term, a chilling effect on satirical political commentary might emerge, with increased calls for editorial oversight and responsibility. As the media industry grapples with these challenges, the incident serves as a stark reminder of the power dynamics and adversarial relationships that exist within media factions. Jezebel, known for its left-leaning, feminist coverage, and Charlie Kirk, a leading conservative voice, exemplify the broader political divides that fuel such controversies. The need for balance and responsibility in media practices is more crucial than ever, ensuring that the discourse remains respectful and that satire does not cross into dangerous territory. Sources: Jezebel Issues Editor’s Note on Article About Casting Etsy Witch Spells on Charlie Kirk Charlie Kirk Assassin: Jezebel Reportedly Hired Witches to Curse MAGA Influencer Days Before Death

'radicalized by some extremist network'

'He was quite clearly and comfortably a supremacist'

Father and brother have served prison time

Unofficial lever is terrorism

'a political phenomenon'

Carolina has fired their football communication coordinator

'I have two words: F*ck you'

'Rapid developments in our investigation'