Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) effusively praised the virtues of the American people in a Tuesday speech at the Republican National Convention in Milwaukee. Rubio took time in his speech to pay particular tribute to Corey Comperatore, the Trump supporter who died in Saturday’s attempt on Trump’s life.  “He was a former fire chief, a loving husband, and was described as ‘the best dad a girl could ever ask for.’ He was a man of God who loved Jesus fiercely and looked after the members of his church,” Rubio said. “Corey was one of the millions of everyday Americans who make our country great. He wasn’t rich, he wasn’t famous, and the only reason why we know his name and story now is because last Saturday he shielded his wife and daughter from an assassin’s bullet. He lost his life the way he lived it: a hero.” “These are the Americans who wear the red hats and wait for hours under a blazing sun to hear Trump speak, and what they want, what they ask for, it is not hateful or extreme,” he added. “What they want is good jobs, and lower prices. What they want is borders that are secure and for those who come here to do so legally. They want to be safe from criminals and from terrorists, and they want for our leaders to care more about our problems here at home, than about the problems of other countries far away.” He concluded, “There is absolutely nothing dangerous, or anything divisive, about putting Americans first.” The post Rubio Praises ‘Everyday Americans’ in RNC Speech appeared first on The American Conservative.

Politics An America-First Energy Agenda Can Transform Environmental Policy Unleashing domestic energy production is the real “green” victory. Cows stand in a field on the ranch of cattle rancher Bob Helmers, who recently allowed utility company Engie to build several wind turbines on his land, April 16, 2021 near Eldorado, Texas. (Photo by SERGIO FLORES/AFP via Getty Images) As radical climate activists rinse and repeat the tired strategy of blocking traffic, throwing soup, and destroying art, the state of our environment worsens. The status quo of environmental activism has left us divided, with the loudest voices dominating conversations while the silent majority, who want common-sense, practical solutions, suffers. We need visionary leadership in energy and environmental policy. Conservatives, with their deep-rooted values of stewardship, economic growth, and national security, are uniquely positioned to offer the change we need.  Conservatives have long valued environmental stewardship, recognizing the importance of preserving our natural resources for future generations. This principle, deeply embedded in conservative philosophy, is evident in the works of influential figures such as Theodore Roosevelt, perhaps the most iconic pioneering force in the conservation movement. Roosevelt’s establishment of national parks, forests, and wildlife refuges was driven by the conviction that preserving America’s natural beauty and resources was essential for the nation’s well-being and prosperity. The principle of stewardship resonates with the conservative value of personal responsibility. Just as individuals are expected to take responsibility for their actions, we must also take responsibility for the impact of our actions on the environment. This includes recognizing and mitigating the negative consequences of pollution, deforestation, and other environmentally harmful practices. The conservative tradition of conservation reflects an understanding that economic prosperity and environmental health are not mutually exclusive, but interconnected. Healthy ecosystems provide clean air, water, and fertile soil—foundations upon which our economy and society depend. Maintaining these natural systems ensures resources necessary for economic growth and future generations’ well-being.  Some conservatives argue that prioritizing emissions reduction could disadvantage America, but they’re wrong. We can assert our rightful leadership role by reducing emissions in a way that puts America first.  To the end of building on the conservative legacy of environmental leadership, I propose three big ideas for a future Trump administration: unleash nuclear energy, let America build, and pursue American energy dominance. Nuclear energy stands out as the largest source of carbon-free energy available today. Despite common misconceptions and unfounded safety concerns, nuclear power remains one of the safest and most reliable energy sources. Countries like France and South Korea demonstrate successful nuclear programs, providing reliable and affordable power, while Germany’s energy failures show what not to do. Germany’s decision to phase out nuclear power increased reliance on coal and Russian natural gas, raising carbon emissions. Moreover, the country’s heavy investment in intermittent renewable energy sources has created challenges in maintaining a steady supply. This nuclear phase-out has also contributed to higher electricity prices and greater dependence on Russian energy imports. Conservatives must dispel the myths and fears that have clouding public perception of nuclear energy. Nuclear energy is safe, and indispensable for lowering carbon pollution, despite what radical environmental groups may say. As the cleanest energy source available, nuclear energy produces zero emissions during electricity generation. Rigorous safety protocols and advanced technologies make nuclear power plants some of the most secure energy facilities in the world, while the reliability of nuclear is unmatched—even by traditional energy sources like natural gas and coal.  Unlike solar and wind, which are intermittent and weather-dependent nuclear plants provide a steady and predictable energy supply. This consistency is crucial for power grid stability and ensures homes and businesses have reliable energy 24/7. Furthermore, nuclear energy produces a significant amount of energy with minimal land use. Unlike solar farms that require vast expanses of land and wind turbines that need to be spaced apart, nuclear power plants have a much smaller footprint. Nuclear’s high energy density allows facilities to be built closer to urban areas where demand is greatest, reducing transmission losses and improving efficiency. Expanding nuclear energy will significantly reduce carbon pollution while ensuring energy security. As conservatives, we must champion this cause, recognizing that true energy independence and environmental stewardship go hand in hand. By supporting nuclear energy, we not only commit to reducing emissions but also bolster national security by decreasing reliance on foreign energy sources at home and abroad. Competing with China and Russia on energy production is not just good environmental policy; it is a strategic necessity. By positioning America as a global leader at the forefront of these industries, we can undermine adversarial nations while taking care of American citizens—after all, leading the way in energy production and technology has profound economic benefits.  An all-of-the-above energy strategy is essential for securing America’s position as a global leader. American-produced oil and gas are crucial components of this strategy. Extracted and processed under some of the highest environmental standards in the world, U.S. oil and gas are cleaner and more sustainable than those from countries like Russia. Meanwhile, the clean energy sector is one of the fastest-growing industries in the world. By unleashing investment in renewable energy, nuclear power, and innovative technologies, we can create a surge of high-quality, well-paying jobs. These jobs span a wide range of skills and industries, from manufacturing and construction to research and development. Expanding the clean energy sector will also drive significant economic growth, as investments in renewable energy infrastructure lead to increased demand for materials and equipment, stimulating technological innovation and resulting in more efficient and cost-effective energy solutions. China and Russia understand that in today’s geopolitical landscape, energy is a critical lever of power and influence. To that end, they have aggressively pursued dominance in energy production and technology. China, in particular, is investing heavily in renewable energy supply chains, aiming to become the global leader in clean energy technology. Russia, with its vast natural gas resources and developing reactor technology, continues to leverage energy exports as a tool of geopolitical influence.  An all-of-the-above energy agenda, which provides Americans with abundant and affordable energy, is closely aligned with Trump’s America-First approach. We cannot afford to let China and Russia eat our lunch. These nations are not just competitors; they are strategic adversaries that actively seek to reshape global power dynamics to their advantage. By allowing them to take the lead in global energy markets, we risk falling behind economically, strategically, and environmentally.  The pursuit of affordable, abundant, increasingly clean energy here at home promises significant economic growth and job creation for American citizens. Particularly in rural and red states that have been largely left behind, modernizing our energy infrastructure and embracing clean energy sources will generate high-quality jobs, stimulate development, and diversify local economies. In fact, recent polling shows 92 percent of young rural conservatives prioritize job creation in energy choices, with 70 percent favoring clean energy solutions. Of course, one of the biggest obstacles to progress in infrastructure development is the labyrinthine permitting process. The average energy project in the U.S. is held up by an astounding 4.5 years and incurs an extra $4.2 million in costs due to outdated government regulations. To prioritize American energy production, we must make it easier to build energy infrastructure here at home—across the entire sector. Critics see permitting reform as a handout to fossil fuels, but this is not the case. In fact, only 18 percent of energy projects delayed by NEPA relate to fossil fuels. Our world demands greater energy production, and American energy, traditional or renewable, is among the cleanest.  Permitting reform also addresses other energy challenges, such as energy blackouts and grid instability exacerbated by extreme weather. Reforms expediting energy technology deployment can increase grid reliability, as a streamlined permitting processes enables faster responses to energy demands. Additionally, accelerating development reduces dependence on aging infrastructure and mitigates power disruptions’ impacts on American communities. The need for permitting reform is starkly highlighted when we compare our current building pace to that of the past. Consider the Empire State Building, an iconic American structure erected in just one year and 45 days, symbolizing a time when the nation could undertake and complete ambitious projects with remarkable speed and efficiency. Contrast this with today’s average energy project, which languishes in permitting for years. For example, a recent U.S. transmission line took an astounding 18 years to clear permitting hurdles. This glaring contrast showcases a clear decline in our ability to build swiftly. Rekindling America’s capacity for rapid, efficient project completion, ensures that we can meet our modern energy needs. Achieving a cleaner environment and leading the world in energy isn’t complicated, but it does require a state-of-the-art regulatory framework. This means balancing safety and environmental regulations with common sense reforms, like clear approval timelines and reducing frivolous lawsuits. Removing unnecessary government barriers, empowers American entrepreneurs to build greener, more rapidly. Simplifying permitting encourages investment in energy and carbon capture technology and stimulates economic growth by allowing American companies to maintain their competitive edge.  America’s energy industry stands ready to build, but onerous regulation stands in the way of our goals.  If elected to a second term, the former President Donald Trump has the power, influence, and opportunity to tie his agenda to a legacy of innovation and leadership. By championing nuclear energy, advocating for permitting reform, and asserting American dominance in clean technology, Trump can trailblaze real solutions and leave an indelible mark on our nation’s future. As the far-left environmental community continues to fumble these issues, an America-First energy agenda could be a promising cornerstone in advancing economic prosperity, enhancing national security, and leaving a more beautiful nation for future generations. Conservatives, committed to stewardship, economic growth, and American leadership, can champion energy and environmental policy, stepping up to embrace these issues with the urgency they deserve. The long-term benefits for our country—and indeed, the world—are immense. The time to act is now, and the opportunity to lead has never been greater. Let’s build a cleaner, stronger, and more prosperous America. The post An America-First Energy Agenda Can Transform Environmental Policy appeared first on The American Conservative.

Politics Utah’s Lee Bullish on a Vance-Led Senate The senator told TAC that the future is bright for the upper chamber. Credit: WikiMedia Commons The energy inside Fiserv Forum was palpable on night one. The former President Donald Trump made a triumphant return in his first public appearance since a would-be assassin’s bullet grazed his ear. Shortly before entering the convention space, Trump chose Sen. J.D. Vance of Ohio as his running mate to carry the mantle of America First when Trump is gone. For the moment, everything seems to be coming up red, and the aperture for what could be possible in the next four years has been blown wide open.  This is especially the case for the U.S. Senate. Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) sat down with The American Conservative to discuss the opportunities that await.  “J.D. Vance is one of my very favorite members of the U.S. Senate,” Lee told TAC right off the bat. “He is in a very small category of senators who are courageous and undeterred to go and advocate for freedom and make sure that we have government reform.” Lee’s enthusiasm for Vance goes beyond issues and messaging. “If Trump and he are elected, J.D. Vance will be the president of the Senate, the leader of the Senate,” Lee said. With Vance, the senate could return to more constitutional roots. “If, as I suspect might be the case, he decides to take a more active role with regard to the Senate than other modern vice presidents have,” Lee argued, Vance can not only assist in passing the Trump agenda but deliver on another timeless Trump promise: “Drain the swamp.” “The most obvious, palpable role that the vice president as president of the Senate plays is to cast breaking votes where the Senate stands equally divided on legislation,” Lee explained. “But the president of the Senate is also the only person constitutionally entitled to sit in the presiding officer chair at any given moment.”  While that seems like a mundane or pedestrian job for the vice president to do, Lee said it would give Vance “enormous influence from that perch, particularly as we approach key votes on things.”  “Even just being there from one day to the next, providing leadership to Senate Republicans and to the Senate as a whole, there’s a lot he can do,” Lee affirmed. If Vance takes a more active role in the Senate’s business, the oligarchy and omnibus way of governance that has dominated the Senate may meet its overdue end. “There was a time when the floor leader was not a terribly significant position. There has been a massive consolidation of power within the Senate over the last two decades,” Lee explained. “There’s nothing about the Constitution that requires it to be that way. The Senate is meant to be an egalitarian body among and between its members. That’s built into the Constitution. One feature of the Constitution that you can’t amend is you can’t change the dynamic of equal representation in the Senate among the states.” “J.D. Vance can help usher in a new era,” Lee declared. Trump’s current and apparent strength is opening up the possibility that Senate Republicans could hold a strong majority in the Senate come January 2025—if the state-level presidential election polls are correct.  “I want very much to believe the general election polls and to believe the theory that this has all the makings of a landslide. I want to believe that, and there’s a part of me that intuitively expects that just because of what people have been through—the cost of living, a typical American family shelling out an extra $1,300 a month just to survive. They’ve had enough,” Lee said. “And I think that’s one of the reasons why I tend to lean intuitively toward thinking the general election polls are sending the right signal. But you can’t expect it to be anything other than a really close race.” If Republicans stay hungry, Lee believes the majority could be larger than one or two votes—it could be three, four, maybe even five, “especially in light of the events over the last few days.”  “The failed assassination attempt, the sense overall that the Democrats have tried to stack the deck against Trump in every way they can and it’s failed,” Lee said. “And I think Americans naturally like to see someone stand up to bullies. And I think that’s going to help not only Trump but Senate Republicans this year a lot.” The big hurdle the is the 50-plus GOP senators themselves. “We control the gavels at that point. We control the subpoena authority. We have the ability to confirm Trump’s people. We have the ability to advance a Trump agenda,” Lee told TAC. “But the differences between 51 and say, 54, 55, 56 is also significant. It’s not quite as stark and immediately obvious, but it’s significant because then it gives us a little bit of a buffer when push comes to shove.”  Surpassing cloture, 60 votes, is very unlikely. That need not be insurmountable. “As the Democrats reminded us over the last three and a half years—particularly the first two of the last three and a half years—there are things that can be done without 60 votes, primarily through the procedure known as budget reconciliation. And there are also things that you can do when you hold the majority when you’ve got leadership, perhaps leadership from a senate president named J.D. Vance, identifying certain objectives,” Lee claimed.  He elaborated: “Let’s say, outside the context of where you can get something through on reconciliation, attaching something important to a number of Democrats—a must pass bill of some sort that the Democrats are enthusiastic about passing—attaching legislation important to the Trump administration that maybe can’t be passed for reconciliation. There’s a lot that can happen with that.” Lee added that, with well over 51 GOP senators, “we don’t have to worry about a couple of senators who might not be on board with the program. That makes a big difference. I’ve talked to Trump a fair amount about his VP pick, and from the very beginning, I emphasized with him there are a number of advantages that J.D. Vance would bring—including the fact that he’s known, well liked in the Senate. He’s proven fearless in the Senate. Hasn’t been there very long, but he’s proven to be wise beyond his years and his time in the Senate. He’s respected and he also knows the Senate rules well. Somebody coming at the job from that vantage point, and knows his way around the Senate would also know how he could help promote the President’s legislative agenda, specifically in his role as Senate president.” And Lee believes the current slate of GOP candidates can deliver on the reforms conservatives want to see in the Senate, especially Bernie Moreno of Ohio. Lee told TAC that Trump shares his optimism.  “Like the rest of us, he’s pretty optimistic about how things look. But he also knows we can’t take anything for granted. He also knows getting the majority doesn’t necessarily assure victory for an America First agenda. Need to be the right message, the right people, who are dialed in,” Lee said. “I don’t want to speak for [Trump], but I suspect that this aspect of J.D. Vance’s abilities, his background and experience, I suspect they had something to do with Trump’s decision.” “Trump knows that J.D. Vance can be not just a leader in the Senate but the leader in the Senate—because that’s what he will be,” Lee concluded. The post Utah’s Lee Bullish on a Vance-Led Senate appeared first on The American Conservative.

The following article, Paul: Why We’ll Never Know What Really Happened in Butler, PA, was first published on Conservative Firing Line. Just days after the attempted assassination of former President Donald Trump, theories are flying from all directions. Many who ridiculed the “conspiracy theories” of conservatives are now suggesting the whole event was a set-up to boost Trump in the polls ahead of the election. Others suggest it was the “deep state” or even foreign actors … Continue reading Paul: Why We’ll Never Know What Really Happened in Butler, PA ...

A surprise choice. The post “This great crescendo”: Paul Stanley chose his favourite sad song first appeared on Far Out Magazine.

Joe Biden: “I have one job, and that’s to beat Donald Trump. I’m absolutely certain I’m the best person to be able to do that. So, we’re done talking about the debate, it’s time to put Trump in a bullseye.” Thomas Matthew Crooks did. Now the president regrets saying what he said, but it’s not about him apologizing, it’s about him being out of control, not knowing what he’s saying, not knowing what he’s doing, and being, every day, more and more of a danger to the United States. (WATCH: The Spectacle Ep. 129: Donald Trump Was Nearly Assassinated. Was It Just Incompetence?) It’s not important whether Biden meant to refer to taking down a target, speaking of a bullseye, or taking Trump down literally. I guess his intent was not to have someone actually kill him, but just to kill him politically. Biden always brags about uniting the nation, but in fact, he has always worked to divide and confront it. What is most serious is not the literalness of what he said to his donors, but the substance. He has been placing Trump outside of democracy for a year now and asserting that he represents a real danger to Americans. He has not been so explicit or so harsh even with the worst terrorist of the Islamic State. The normal thing, in the end, if people believe you, is that they react and what could have happened happens. The dividing line drawn by Biden does not exclude only Trump, in this the Republican leader is absolutely right: “They’re not after me, they’re after you, and I just happen to be standing in the way.” Thank God for Trump’s Survival God has saved the West from a dark period of uncertainty, poverty, fear, and perhaps violence. There is no other explanation. It could only have been the hand of God that saved Trump, and with him, probably, the United States and the West. Whether you think he is the best Republican candidate or not, what is certain is that history has placed him at the right time and in the right place to put an end to the leftist drift of the Democrats, increasingly extreme, increasingly totalitarian, increasingly determined to put an end to individual liberties in the great country of freedom. It is obvious that Biden is not fit to govern, but don’t forget that his ideas are almost worse than his mental faculties. (READ MORE: Advice To Trump: Fire The Secret Service) No one knows what would have happened if Trump had been assassinated. What is certain is that it would not have been good. It would be almost impossible to contain the anger of a nation that has had to endure the daily insults of the media, the loudspeakers of the Democratic Party these past years, and the death of its politics. The real death of its leader would have been the last straw. But, as I say, God wanted to save Trump this time, and I have the feeling that Providence wants to leave us with the hope that America will once again be great and free, and once again be the beacon that the West needs to get rid of the sectarianism and totalitarianism of the postmodern left. Trump: The National Hero After the assassination attempt, nothing will be the same. Trump is no longer just a candidate for the White House, he is now a national hero. Even those who will never vote for him have been able to feel in their hearts the resilience of a man of conviction, with a determination that cannot be faked 40 seconds after someone has tried to kill you. He had never seen death so close, and his reaction was to stand up without fear, with serenity and courage, and tell his people to fight, to fight for what they believe in. (READ MORE: The Ballot and the Bullet Against Trump) Again, that attitude, that pose, those words that could not be prepared beforehand — that cannot be faked. That is what Trump carries inside, and that is what irritates the Democrats the most. While Biden does not believe in anything beyond his family’s business, Trump seems willing to give even his own life for his conservative ideas, for his plan for national prosperity, and for each and every American. All in all, while it is obvious that the bloodied icon will be one of the best election marketing campaigns in history, this is no time for triumphalism. Republicans must be more vigilant than ever because the Left is at its most dangerous when it is most desperate. Unfortunately, I fear that the assassination attempt on Trump is not the last, nor the worst we will see before the elections. The post Trump Is Now Our National Hero appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

False Flag: Why Queer Politics Mean the End of America By Joy Pullmann  (Regnery, 336 pages, $28) Now that we’ve been relieved from a month of nonstop displays of color and parading from the alphabet soup brigade, we can all breathe a collective sigh of relief. The festivities of the month have restored the proper flag to its proper place. While the Fourth of July was a much-needed palate cleanser from the appalling displays of sexual gratification in the streets of San Francisco and throughout U.S. cities, heteronormative cisgender patriots should be weary of letting their guards down too soon. Joy Pullmann’s new book False Flag: Why Queer Politics Mean the End of America, reminds us why. (READ MORE: The Trans Reckoning Is Not Yet Here — But It’s Coming Soon) The short respite will be disturbed by ever-aggressive rainbow displays from the “colorful people,” as one of my relatives calls them, along with demands for “equality.” It must. Queer dogma is more a religion than a civil rights movement, and the 107 gender icons demand worship. After all, the mission — as Pullman so clearly outlines — is nothing other than a complete upending of Western civilization and the norms and rituals that define it. The number one target is the heteronormative family. The alphabet activists will not rest until they destroy it. Gay Marriage Is Radically Different From Its Traditional Counterpart Pullman reminds us that, for many homosexuals, marriage was a “co-option into a straight society.” But leadership in the gay movement preferred to be considered as “outsider(s), anti-bourgeois, radical.” The idea of gay marriage is vastly different than the Judeo-Christian notion of matrimony and as Pullman points out “even when they are in a relationship, many queers have sex with people besides their usual partner.” In other words, non-monogamous relationships are baked into the cake. One cannot separate homosexuality from its culture of promiscuity. According to Pullmann, this inability to control sexual urges displays an immaturity not conducive to the self-governance necessary for a constitutional republic. Exposing children to queer ideology, as so many are determined to do, tears at the fabric of this country. “It should go without saying that subjecting children to sexual chaos retards their ability to govern themselves,” writes Pullman, “and therefore, from the next functioning generation of a self-governing society.” It’s this lack of self-control and desire that leads children, as well as adults, astray. Pullmann even outlines the trend of “furries” — people who have an active interest in animal characters with human characteristics — that emanate from homosexual fetishes. The fact that the words “furry porn” exist should horrify people. The idea that there are adults who dress up as animals for sexual gratification and enjoyment is absurd, and, as Pullman astutely ascertains, “indicates a refusal to assume the responsibilities of adulthood.” Those who spend their days in fantasy are not the type of people who can conduct themselves in ways necessary to “sustain republican freedoms in America.” Queer Politics Threatens Free Society So-called gender-affirming care is another threat to a free society. Transitioning genders and claiming men can become pregnant undermines the natural order on which family structures are based. It’s also a flat-out lie. Insisting that society lives by this lie is something else altogether. Yet, insist they do, and in doing so, the gender and sex activists destroy the fundamental civil liberties protected by everything from the First to the Fourteenth Amendment. Sex-based politics, along with any other politics based on external characteristics or choices like race or religion, is unlawful. Ever since Obergefell vs. Hodges, the 2015 decision that codified gay marriage into law, this country has been on a slippery slope of conflating civil rights with individual preference. Pullmann’s account demonstrates how confused our culture and politicians themselves are about the difference. She walks the reader through the cultural shifts and legal decisions that convinced the American public to acquiesce to a fully queer agenda. This manipulation of public sentiment paved the way for government overreach and Pullman offers an eye-opening evaluation of how every branch of government has been compromised to accommodate an alphabet soup agenda. From our courthouses to our schools, we cannot escape the multicolored indoctrination. Yet, people seem to be mostly unaware of just how dedicated the Biden administration is to progressive sex politics. Pullman exposes it all. From daycare to foreign policy, the current administration ties funding and aid to their ideological sexual agenda. They’ve gone so far as to propose blocking Christian families who refuse to affirm such ideology from fostering or adopting children. This not only goes against the conscience of most Americans but also freedom of speech and freedom of religion. It is a colossal waste of money. (READ MORE: Voters Support Faith-Based Foster Families) For example, Pullman describes how the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) which administers federal food programs, “must investigate allegations of discrimination based on gender identity or sexual orientation.” That means anyone who uses biologically correct pronouns for a colleague who feels differently can be lawfully prosecuted. And prosecutions take time and resources. The Total Marxist Cultural Revolution No matter what identity one assumes, all progressive policies have the same motive: To create chaos and destroy the norms and power structures of Western civilization, including the nuclear family, “a key bulwark of limited self-government,” says Pullmann. Nothing does that more effectively than queer ideology. Queer theorists and BLM activists are the same. They want nothing less than a total Marxist cultural revolution. And despite their claim that “love is love,” the movement is quite violent in its methodology. It declares war on bodies and sacrifices biological reality for internal feelings of discontent and rebellion. Normally I would consider equating the demands and activities of LGBTQIA+ (did I miss any letters?) activists to communism pretty hyperbolic, but after the rapid decline of moral values in our communities in just the past three years, I’d say Pullman is pretty spot on with her assessment. In a very short amount of time, the Biden administration has allowed and supported men to compete in women’s sports, young ladies to undergo double mastectomies with alarming impunity from medical professionals entrusted with their care, and half-naked young adults to flail about on the White House lawn. Its cabinet is filled with clowns: Men who pretend to be women (at HHS no less), one of whom was caught and dismissed for stealing a suitcase of women’s clothing. These types of shenanigans serve to prove Pullman’s points. We are a deeply unserious nation at a time when sobriety and clarity are desperately needed. Meanwhile, much of the American public seems to sit idly by, unconcerned with the fraying of the moral fabric. And while “agree to disagree” seems like a nice option, it is no longer a viable one. As Pullman states toward the end of her book: Politics is war by other means, and negotiating with cultural Marxists is like negotiating with terrorists. They do not prefer a different route to the same goal. They want Mad Max. We want peace, the natural order, and beauty. Only one of us can win. For the sake of us all, it better be the Americans who still show allegiance to the original Constitution in our hearts and deeds. The rainbows-love-and-light piece of me, who counts some of the gay people in my life among those I love most, cringes at this thought. The realist, the one who loves God and truth more than I love anything, including myself, cannot deny Pullmann’s evaluation and prescription. The post Why Gay Politics Matters appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.

First Lady Jill Biden seems to be stepping into a new, more prominent role. Not only did she escort her husband off the presidential debate stage while excitedly praising him for “answering all of the questions,” she went on the campaign trail this week and promised prospective voters that she is “all in” on her husband’s reelection campaign. (READ MORE: Kamala Kamala Chameleon: Shameful Pretender) On today’s episode of The Spectator P.M. Podcast, hosts Ellie Gardey Holmes and Aubrey Gulick discuss the first lady’s role in hiding her husband’s worsening mental condition. Tune in to hear their thoughts!   Like and share The Spectator P.M. Podcast, and tune in to our next episode! Read Aubrey and Ellie’s writing here and here. Listen to the Spectator P.M. Podcast with Lyrah Margo and Ellie Gardey on Spotify. Watch the Spectator P.M. Podcast with Lyrah Margo and Ellie Gardey on Rumble. READ MORE: ‘Existential Threat to Democracy’ Watch the Podcast Here:   The post <i>The Spectator P.M. Podcast</i> Ep. 60: Is Jill Biden Running the Show? appeared first on The American Spectator | USA News and Politics.