2024 Keeway V302 C in Black Keeway‚ the motorcycle company founded in Hungary in 1999 and owned by Chinese manufacturer Zhejiang Qianjiang Motorcycle Group Co.‚ is corporate manager and co-owner of the Benelli brand and also sells motorcycles under its own name. It has announced 2024 Keeway models for the American market‚ including the V302 C lightweight cruiser‚ the 1960s-styled Sixties 300 scooter‚ the smaller retro Versilia 150 scooter‚ and the modern Vieste 200 scooter.  2024 Keeway V302 C  The V302 C lightweight cruiser is powered by a liquid-cooled 298cc V-Twin with SOHC and 4 valves per cylinder. Keeway claims 30 hp at 8‚500 rpm and 19.5 lb-ft of torque at 6‚500 rpm. The V302 C has a 6-speed gearbox and belt drive.  2024 Keeway V302 C in Red Keeway emphasizes the long and low attitude of the V302 C‚ which has a wheelbase of 55.9 inches‚ a low seat height of 27.1 inches‚ forward-mounted foot controls‚ a wide handlebar‚ and a claimed weight of 367 lb. An inverted fork provides 4.5 inches of travel‚ and dual shocks provide 1.8 inches of travel and are preload adjustable. The V302 C has single-disc brakes front and rear‚ and ABS is standard.  2024 Keeway V302 C in Red Visual highlights on the 2024 Keeway V302 C include bar-end mirrors‚ low-profile fenders‚ LED lighting‚ shorty drag bars‚ and blacked-out styling. Instrumentation is fully digital with a tachometer surrounding a speedometer‚ fuel gauge‚ gear indicator‚ odometer‚ and clock.  The 2024 Keeway V302 C is available in Black‚ Red‚ or Gray‚ and the MSRP is $4‚999.  2024 Keeway Sixties 300  At the top of Keeway’s scooter lineup for the American market is the retro Sixties 300. It’s powered by a liquid-cooled 278cc Single with 4 valves that produces a claimed 25 hp at 8‚250 rpm and 17.7 lb-ft of torque at 7‚000 rpm. It has a CVT transmission and a top speed of 75 mph. 2024 Keeway Sixties 300 in White The Sixties 300 comes with a KYB fork and KYB dual shocks with preload adjustability‚ as well as front and rear disc brakes with Nissin calipers and Bosch ABS.  2024 Keeway Sixties 300 in Sky Blue The Sixties 300 leans into its 1960s styling with a front-fender ornament‚ a front grille‚ rider and passenger quilted seat pads‚ and swoopy side panels. Also included is a digital display with analog gauges‚ LED lighting‚ under-seat storage‚ and a rear luggage rack.   2024 Keeway Sixties 300 in Matte Black The Keeway Sixties 300 is available in Sky Blue‚ Matte Black‚ or White with an MSRP of $5‚299.  2024 Keeway Versilia 150  The Versilia 150 scooter is the smaller sibling of the Sixties 300 and is powered by a 150cc Single with a claimed 9.7 hp at 7‚000 rpm and 7.7 lb-ft of torque at 6‚500 rpm‚ paired with a CVT transmission. Braking is provided by a single front disc and a drum in the rear.  2024 Keeway Versilia 150 in White The Versilia 150 takes design cues from the Sixties 300 but with a more modern twist. Details include a stitched seat‚ a stacked LED headlight‚ under-seat storage‚ and a rear storage rack. Instrumentation includes a speedometer‚ odometer‚ fuel gauge‚ and clock. The Versilia 150 also includes a locking glove box with a USB port‚ a backpack hook‚ and keyless ignition.  The Keeway Versilia 150 is available in Gray‚ Red‚ or White with an MSRP of $2‚499.  2024 Keeway Vieste 200  The Vieste 200 takes on a more modern appearance compared to the Sixties 300 or the Versilia 150. It’s powered by an air-cooled 172cc Single that makes a claimed 11.4 hp at 7‚500 rpm and 8.9 lb-ft of torque at 5‚500 rpm with a top speed of 59 mph and a CVT transmission. Suspension is provided by a telescopic fork and dual rear shocks‚ and braking comes from 240mm front and 215mm rear disc brakes.  2024 Keeway Vieste 200 in Blue Instrumentation on the Vieste 200 comes in the form of analog gauges for the speedometer and tachometer along with digital displays of temperature‚ odometer‚ trip meter‚ clock‚ and fuel level. All lighting is LED‚ and the scooter comes with rear grab rails‚ two storage pockets above the footwell‚ a USB port‚ and a large storage bin under the seat.  2024 Keeway Vieste 200 in Gray The Vieste 200 is available in Blue‚ Gray‚ or White with an MSRP of $3‚399.  Visit the Keeway website for more information.  Check out more new bikes in Rider’s 2024 Motorcycle Buyers Guide   The post 2024 Keeway Models Announced: V302 C Cruiser and Three Scooters  appeared first on Rider Magazine.

NetChoice Attorney Paul Clement and U.S. Solicitor General Elizabeth Prelogar both made stunning admissions during oral arguments for landmark free speech cases.  On Feb. 26‚ the U.S. Supreme Court heard two landmark cases — Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton — challenging Texas and Florida’s state laws protecting free speech. The new laws would limit Big Tech’s ability to censor users based on viewpoint discrimination‚ as a publisher might. However‚ the protections provided by Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act would continue to apply. But Big Tech wants to have its cake and eat it too. While arguing on behalf of Big Tech‚ Solicitor General Prelogar made the admission that social media companies are "literally‚ factually publishers." This admission was echoed by Clement who told Justice Clarence Thomas that “Congress wanted us to operate as publishers.” Related: Everything You Need to Know About Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton Clement and Prelogar can't have it both ways. These companies either exist as a platform for all with liability protection from how individuals use their platform or as a publisher with the right to censor and legal responsibility for the content they host. During the oral arguments for Moody v. NetChoice‚ Clement actually broke down the publisher/platform distinction before stating his own personal misinterpretation of Section 230. “Congress in passing Section 230 looked at some common law cases that basically said‚ well‚ if you just a pure conduit that means that you are free from liability‚ but if you start becoming a publisher‚ by keeping some bad conduct out‚ content out‚ then you no longer have that common law liability protection‚” Clement said‚ before adding‚ “As I understand 230‚ the whole point of it was to encourage websites and other regulated parties to essentially exercise editorial discretion‚ to keep some of that bad stuff out of there.”  The bad stuff Section 230 attempted to exclude was “obscene‚ lewd‚ lascivious‚ filthy‚ excessively violent‚ harassing‚ or otherwise objectionable‚” not simply whatever a platform decided it did not like. Solicitor General Prelogar gave an equally incoherent answer when Justice Neil Gorsuch questioned whether social media companies would lose their liability protections if they were considered publishers. She preceded to restate Clements’ mangled understanding of Section 230. “Congress specifically recognized the platforms are creating a speech product. They are literally‚ factually publishers‚ and Congress wanted to grant them immunity‚” she said. “It was for the purpose of encouraging this kind of editorial discretion. That's the whole point of the Good Samaritan blocking provision.”  Justice Samuel Alito also pushed back against the nonsensical claims during arguments for NetChoice v. Paxton.  “If you were a newspaper and you published the content that appears in every single one of the videos on YouTube that you allowed to be included‚ you would be liable potentially for the content of that material. And I don’t understand the rationale for 230 if it wasn’t that you can’t be held responsible for that because this is really not your message. Either it’s your message or it’s not your message‚ I don’t understand how it can be both‚” Alito said. [Emphasis added]. Alito went on to drive home how NetChoice wanted it both ways. “It’s your message when you want to escape state regulation‚ but it’s not your message when you want to escape liability under state tort law‚” he added.  Conservatives are under attack. Contact your representatives and demand that Big Tech be held to account to mirror the First Amendment while providing transparency and an equal footing for conservatives. If you have been censored‚ contact us at the Media Research Center contact form‚ and help us hold Big Tech accountable. MRC Free Speech Counsel for Investigations Tim Kilcullen contributed to this report.

On Monday afternoon‚ the New York Post dropped an exclusive that‚ after a few days of public wrangling and possible legal action‚ CBS News returned to Catherine Herridge her confidential files — including sensitive material‚ potentially containing sourcing — after having been seized when she was unceremoniously fired as part of layoffs by parent company Paramount Global. Reporter Alexandra Steigrad had the story: “CBS News on Monday finally returned confidential files belonging to fired investigative reporter Catherine Herridge amid mounting pressure from the House Judiciary Committee and the union representing the journalist‚ The Post has learned.” Steigrad explained that the reason for the whole hubbub stemmed from the fact that‚ upon being laid off‚ Herridge’s “personal files — along with her work laptop‚ which may have contained other confidential info — were immediately confiscated and locked away at” CBS News’s Washington bureau. In a statement to the Post‚ CBS said “Herridge’s union representative picked up her materials this morning.” The paper said Herridge herself would be “reviewing the materials‚” which would mean she’s combing through everything to ensure nothing was taken. For their part‚ Herridge’s union‚ SAG-AFTRA said they’re “pleased” CBS made this decision following “SAG-AFTRA's intervention and widespread media coverage that underscored shared concerns about press freedom and the First Amendment.” The Post cited a source as having heard CBS cry uncle and “was particularly rattled when SAG-AFTRA came out strongly in favor of Herridge.” In other words‚ CBS messed with the wrong reporter when trying to pull off something unprecedented when it came to a reporter's files that include sensitive details like sources‚ who risk their lives and livelihoods to share information with journalists. If CBS wasn’t going to comply‚ they would have faced more pressure beyond the union taking them to court as‚ according to the Post‚ the House Judiciary Committee launched a probe Friday into this chicanery. Nonetheless‚ CBS News President Ingrid Ciprian-Matthews and fellow CBS head honchos “have until March 1 to provide information on who handled Herridge’s files and who ordered them to be retained‚ among other things.” Media Research Center Founder and President Brent Bozell had his own thoughts on this story‚ posting on X: CBS shouldn't have had to be publicly shamed into doing what they should have done in the first place. They still owe @CBS_Herridge a very full and public apology. — Brent Bozell (@BrentBozell) February 27‚ 2024 Steigrad also outlined how Herridge reportedly clashed with Ciprian-Matthews over covering claims of Biden family corruption and this isn’t Herridge’s only problem as she still faces legal peril over a story from her Fox News days (click “expand”): During her time at CBS‚ Herridge had encountered roadblocks from higher-ups over her         Hunter Biden coverage and had also clashed with Ciprian-Matthews‚ a sharp-elbowed executive who was investigated — and cleared — in 2021 over favoritism and discriminatory hiring and management practices‚ as The Post previously reported. Some sources speculated that the network may believe Herridge has information in her files that could lead to a lawsuit for wrongful termination. Others mused that she may have sensitive information — including sources — that are central to her investigation into Hunter Biden. Currently‚ Herridge is under fire for not complying with US District Judge Christopher Cooper’s order to reveal how she learned about a federal probe into a Chinese American scientist who operated a graduate program in Virginia. The journalist may soon be held in contempt of court for not divulging her source for an investigative piece she penned in 2017 when she worked for Fox News. She could be ordered to personally pay fines that could total as much as $5‚000 a day. As an example of how her work at CBS expanded far beyond Biden family corruption to traditional‚ shoe-string‚ traditional investigative reporting that’s all too rare in today’s media ecosystem‚ the Post cited the US Justice and Advocacy Group as having voiced concern Monday about her firing after having worked with her “last November on an investigation that revealed the National Guard denied 30% of injury claims that are recommended by local commanders.”

This is the kind of keen political insight that makes MSNBC our go-to network -- for laughs. On today's Morning Joe‚ Scarborough was dragging out the old DNC talking point that hey‚ the Republicans have lost the nationwide popular vote in seven of the last eight elections. This is how Electoral College Deniers argue. Eugene Robinson‚ MSNBC's chief political analyst‚ who is also an associate editor of the Washington Post‚ was responding to Joe Scarborough's question as to what Republicans should do‚ given their popular vote record.  Here was Robinson's description of the Republican strategy to win the White House despite losing the popular vote: "Well‚ the first thing you do‚ is you gerrymander the hell out of everything‚ right? To‚ to try to build in an advantage. " Not "right‚" Gene. Wrong! In 48 of the 50 states‚ the winner of the state's popular vote receives ALL of the state's Electoral College votes. [Maine and Nebraska have different ways of allocating their Electoral College votes.] Given that Maine and Nebraska have only a combined nine Electoral College votes‚ that means that 98.3% of all Electoral College votes are awarded in‚ 48 of 50 states‚ on a winner-take-all popular vote basis. You can't gerrymander your way around that‚ Gene! Yes‚ both parties do their share of gerrymandering of congressional districts. The latest example is New York‚ where Democrat state legislators rejected a bipartisan congressional district map in order to gerrymander things to their maximum advantage. But you can't gerrymander presidential electoral districts when—in almost all the states!—there's only one presidential district: the entire state! Joe Scarborough made his own contribution to today's absurdity. Scarborough claimed that Republicans have not won one presidential election this century—but then had to concede‚ if only‚ that is‚ if Ralph Nader hadn't run in 2000‚ Jill Stein hadn't run in 2016‚ and George W. Bush hadn't run for re-election in 2004 and won! That's a lot of ifs‚ Joe‚ amounting to three GOP presidential wins this century! We may be headed for another cycle where "If RFK Jr. and Jill Stein and Cornel West hadn't run‚" Republicans are losers. By Scarborough's logic‚ he's the most fair-minded‚ objective‚ talking head in liberal-media land -- if it weren't for the fact that he's totally in the tank for Joe Biden! Here's the transcript. MSNBC Morning Joe 2/27/24 6:05 am ET JOE SCARBOROUGH: I think‚ I think sometimes you need to stepback‚ right?Sometimes you need to step back and you go‚ why are things happening the way they are? And I know we've all seen op-eds talking about this through the years. But the Republicans have lost seven of the last eight presidential elections when it comes to popular vote. They've been able‚ they figured out in '16 how to win‚ and just barely‚ and they did it through the Electoral College.  But you know‚ Gene‚ not to get too deep into it here‚ but I'm going to get deep in it here‚ because it's just kinda what I do. If you take away Ralph Nader in 2000‚ you take away Jill Stein in 2016‚ get this‚ a Republican‚ a Republican would not have been elected president this century. And that's‚ of course‚ assuming Bush doesn't run in 2004‚ win re-election. But‚ but the Republicans have lost the country. They've lost -- they've won one. This is amazing. Since 1992‚ Republicans have won the popular vote one time.  So‚ what do you do if you know you're going to lose? You've lost the country. You're not going to change anything‚. You're just going to keep denying elections! And they're trying to perfect it now. EUGENE ROBINSON: I know‚ yeah. Well‚ the first thing you do‚ is you gerrymander the hell out of everything‚ right? To‚ to try to build in an advantage.  You put your thumb on the scale in every way you can‚ which the Republican party did. And‚ and then you still lose. So the only recourse after that is just to say‚ no‚ it didn't happen. I didn't lose. I actually won‚ even though‚ even though you lost.

An expert review panel observed "gaps" in Boeing's safety culture‚ according to a report released Monday by the Federal Aviation Administration.The FAA's expert panel members recently completed an extensive review of the design and production of Boeing's airplanes after a door panel blew out during an Alaska Airlines flight last month. The report found "a disconnection between Boeing's senior management and other members of the organization on safety culture." Panel experts expressed concerns that the company's reporting systems failed to encourage "open communication‚" potentially causing retaliation fears."The Expert Panel also observed inadequate and confusing implementation of the five components of a positive safety culture‚" the report stated. Boeing's five safety-culture components include: "Reporting Culture‚ Just Culture‚ Flexible Culture‚ Learning Culture‚ and Informed Culture."The report revealed "gaps" in Boeing's safety‚ including "a lack of awareness of safety-related metrics at all levels of the organization."The company was advised to review the panel's recommendations "and develop an action plan" within six months.Boeing responded to the report's release by thanking the panel."We've taken important steps to foster a safety culture that empowers and encourages all employees to share their voice. But there is more work to do‚" the company stated. "We will carefully review the panel's assessment and learn from their findings‚ as we continue our comprehensive efforts to improve our safety and quality programs."The FAA appointed the expert panel early last year. The agency noted that it "will immediately begin a thorough review of the report and determine next steps regarding the recommendations as appropriate.""We will continue to hold Boeing to the highest standard of safety and will work to ensure the company comprehensively addresses these recommendations‚" the FAA added.Last month's mid-air blowout prompted Boeing to reshuffle its management team. Blaze News previously reported that as a result of the shake-up‚ Ed Clark‚ the head of the company's 737 Max program‚ was replaced.A United States National Transportation Safety Board preliminary report found that the plane involved in the incident may have left the Boeing factory‚ overseen by Clark‚ without key bolts to secure the emergency door panel.Boeing's investors have since lodged a lawsuit against the company‚ claiming that its "serious safety lapses" and "poor quality control" measures caused a dip in stock prices.Reuters reported that Boeing CEO Dave Calhoun is scheduled to meet with FAA Administrator Mike Whitaker on Tuesday to review his recent visit to the company's 737 factory.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

The authorities in Ohio reported that an amputated human finger was discovered in a Walmart parking lot. Now‚ the police are asking for help and information on how it got there in the first place‚ according to the Kansas City Star.The authorities in Sidney‚ Ohio‚ were alerted to the horrific sight of an amputated human finger at a Walmart off West Michigan Street on Sunday. However‚ it is still not clear how it got there.The city government of Sidney‚ Ohio‚ took to Facebook after the alarming discovery‚ writing: "The Sidney Police Department approaches all investigations with a high level of seriousness. As such‚ a request for community assistance has been made in an effort to support the investigation. During the preliminary investigation phase‚ the department exhausted all possibilities within nearby hospitals and is working with other law enforcement agencies in conjunction with the Montgomery County Coroner’s office."The coroner's office was able to confirm that the finger did indeed belong to a human‚ likely female. However‚ no medical providers who have been alerted to the situation have been able to link the finger to any recent patients‚ per CBS News.The authorities have asked the surrounding community for help with the investigation."The Sidney Police Department is committed to examining all potential criminal and non-criminal scenarios. Anyone with information regarding this is asked to call the Sidney Police Department at 937-498-2351 or Crime Stoppers at 937-492-8477 (TIPS)‚" the Facebook post continued.Facebook users chimed in on the development‚ with one user suggesting that cartels are known for "dismembering body parts when a Drug deal goes bad." Another user said that "who ever left it there didn't leave it voluntarily. A finger is not something you just drop without noticing."While the investigation is still in the early stages‚ the police have been unable to find a match for the lost digit. Nate Robinson‚ who frequently shops at the Walmart‚ said: “That’s pretty crazy to think about."“How do you not know whose finger is missing? There should be a body connected to that‚ right?” "I thought it was the strangest thing I ever heard‚" Robinson continued.Briaunna Gregory said that she would have freaked out if she had been the one to find the lost finger.“I’d freak out [and] probably turn around and go home. [I’d] never come to this Walmart again‚” she said‚ according to WHIO.Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

Democrats are notoriously lazier than conservatives‚ but not when it comes to keeping Donald Trump from becoming president again. In a report from the Atlantic‚ Democrats are apparently weighing the option of “coming back with a vengeance” and refusing to certify a Trump win — ironically‚ on January 6‚ 2025. “Isn’t that an insurrection?” Pat Gray asks. "Isn’t that what we’ve decided?” “If there’s no law in Georgia‚ there’s no law in New York‚ no law in D.C.‚ and they decide on January 6 to ‘come back with a vengeance’ — you know there will be demonstrations all over‚ and then they overturn the election‚” Glenn Beck says‚ disturbed. However‚ while the legal attacks on Trump have been relentless and from every angle‚ Stu Burguiere thinks it can actually affect the former president positively. “I think it’s going to be cemented that a lot of this was just crazy political attacks‚ and that’s what Trump politically needs to convince people of‚ he needs to be able to get people over that line and think‚ ‘This actually was unfair‚’” he explains. Glenn agrees‚ especially considering the result lawsuits have had on other politicians. “I’ve heard since Bill Clinton‚ that when you persecute somebody like this‚ and you’re unfair‚ and you use the court system to go after them‚ what happens with the black population‚ Pat?” he says. “They’re sensitive to it‚” Pat says‚ before Glenn agrees‚ “And they will rally around that person.” To hear more‚ watch the clip below. Want more from Glenn Beck?To enjoy more of Glenn’s masterful storytelling‚ thought-provoking analysis‚ and uncanny ability to make sense of the chaos‚ subscribe to BlazeTV — the largest multi-platform network of voices who love America‚ defend the Constitution‚ and live the American dream.

The White House was slammed on Monday for releasing a woefully inadequate statement about the shocking murder of Laken Riley. Police have charged Jose Ibarra‚ a 26-year-old Venezuelan immigrant living in the U.S. illegally‚ for murdering Riley‚ a 22-year-old Georgia college student‚ on the University of Georgia campus last week. Court documents allege that Ibarra didn't simply kill Riley. Rather‚ police accuse him of "disfiguring her skull." The heinous crime has brought increased attention to the border crisis and President Joe Biden's immigration policies‚ and the administration's response to Riley's murder isn't helping. On Monday‚ a White House spokesperson released the following statement: We would like to extend our deepest condolences to the family and loved ones of Laken Hope Riley. People should be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law if they are found to be guilty. Given this is an active case‚ we would have to refer you to state law enforcement and ICE. The lackluster statement — which doesn't‚ in fact‚ include any word from President Biden himself — was quickly slammed. "No statement from Biden? Just a few cold words from a press aide. Pathetic‚" Rep. Jim Banks (R-Ind.) said. '"People should be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law if they are found to be guilty.' Really? The White House refused to hold this illegal alien accountable for crossing our border illegally in 2022‚" Rep. Andy Biggs (R-Ariz.) said. "I've heard NO APOLOGIES or remorse from @TheDemocrats about their open border policies leading to another murdered American‚" Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) said in response. "Tragic and preventable. Joe Biden took 94 executive actions in his first 100 days to expose our southern border. 3 years later‚ Biden still refuses to take accountability for creating the worst border catastrophe in American history. His failure is having deadly consequences‚" Sen. Markwayne Mullin (R-Okla.) responded. "Once again‚ Biden refuses to take accountability for creating the worst border disaster in American history. What a sad and pathetic statement given his administration's actions have allowed this to take place. @POTUS stop the invasion‚ shut down the border‚" Rep. Eric Burlison (R-Mo.) said. "Mr. President‚ instead of making excuses for her murder‚ and defending policies that weaken our immigration laws‚ we must ensure justice for Laken by first securing our border‚" Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R-Ga.) said. "I see they left out the part that her murder was a result of leftist sanctuary city policies and the open border‚" Jeremy Redfern‚ press secretary for Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis (R)‚ pointed out. "If only the White House showed similar deference to ICE on actually enforcing our laws‚ then Laken Riley may still be alive. There were thousands of detention beds available to detain and remove Laken’s killer when he entered illegally‚" the National Immigration Center for Enforcement said. As Blaze News reported‚ Immigration and Customs Enforcement confirmed that Ibarra entered the U.S. illegally in September 2022.About a year later‚ Ibarra was arrested in New York City for "acting in a manner to injure a child less than 17 and a motor vehicle license violation." But he was "released by the NYPD before a detainer could be issued‚" ICE said. Ibarra then moved to Georgia sometime last fall. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!

When active-duty U.S. Air Force member Aaron Bushnell‚ 25‚ died after setting himself on fire outside the Israeli Embassy in Washington‚ D.C.‚ while hollering "free Palestine!" woke social media users flooded the X platform with tributes to Bushnell punctuated with the phrase "rest in power" as opposed to the traditional "rest in peace." For example‚ Green Party presidential candidate Jill Stein posted the following message‚ which has received well over 1 million views since Monday: "Rest in power Aaron Bushnell. 'I will no longer be complicit in genocide. Free Palestine!' May his sacrifice deepen our commitment to stop genocide now." Uh-oh Well‚ it appear that leftists of a more rabid nature aren't too happy with the likes of Stein‚ and they're demanding that the phrase "rest in power" be reserved for black people only. The following X user created a video showing a whole bunch of social media posts from annoyed wokesters explaining the unwritten rules surrounding the proper usage of "rest in power." Content warning: Language‚ potentially disturbing images: — (@) Here comes the backlash In the wake of the pointed "rest in power" corrections from the militant left‚ let's just say not everyone is down with being ordered around over their speech. To wit: — (@) — (@) — (@) — (@) Some others: "I will now say #RestInPower every time a white person of notoriety dies‚" one X user wrote. "Not because it’s important to do so‚ but because we’ve been told we’re not supposed to by those who attempt to demean us with controlled-speech. I reject their hollow dictates." "Put the kids to bed. Told them all to rest in power‚" another commenter quipped. "What if someone was electrocuted? Technically wouldn’t they Rest in Power?" another user wondered with tongue fully in cheek. Like Blaze News? Bypass the censors‚ sign up for our newsletters‚ and get stories like this direct to your inbox. Sign up here!